ITT: Quintessential "punchable face" actors
>>214957496OK you win.
>>214956465god this guy is the worst
>>214956174this gigafaggot
>>214967133the third one played an annoying cunt of a character in an annoying cunt of a cringe movie called Baby Driver or something
>white people bad>brown people good>police bad>open borders goodDid I miss something? The "revolutionaries" only seem to care about having open borders, the police are all cruel racist white supremacists with no morals. I kept waiting for the movie to have a clever twist or reveal but no, it ends up in the exact same place it started.. waste of 2.5 hrs. Acting was also shit and penn made a cringe villain. I feel that I've been duped with the reviews of this.
can you really say the movie was a success, or even "good" if the mainstream 90%+ of people completely missed the point, or misconstrued it entirely? like, if PTA was earnestly directing a super elitist social satire where "both sides are depicted as buffoons" then why is the entire story told from their perspective, with the only scenes from the opposite side showing an unironic nazi secret society built on racial purity and "hailing satan(ick)"? we're ostensibly supposed to root for these "buffoons" on the left in their righteous (from their perspective) revolution, as PTA gives no alternative, and in fact makes sure you realize that's the case when the daughter chooses to willingly follow in her mother's footsteps even though she was totally abandoned by her in the first place. the mainstream reaction to this certainly doesn't SEEM like pta got across that nobody is the good guy here, as you all are so willing to do mental gymnastics for, and in fact it seems just the opposite.
far left woke money laundering slop
>>214952956>behold the new Zendaya tier sheboon mutt with no sex appeal
>>214957458His wife looks like oriental as fuck since she's a half kikeThe love interest of leo is one of the ugliest sheboon they could cast
>>214953541He doesn’t get pegged he gets his asshole licked
What was the moral of the story?
>>214967365Don't trust Chinamen with your manifacturing, they will fuck you?
Do poor Swedish women have to be anally raped to receive food stamps in Sweden? I can't believe something like that even happens in African war zones.
It's their culture
>>214966724Anytime and anywhere a man is in a position of authority and a female is in need she's gonna get fucked.
>>214967121In the third world sure but not in a rich highly developed country like Sweden.
Do they even have one or the concept of Art at all? Do they consume muggle media or are aware of it? The only mentioned in the series is a children's book compiling folk tales, and it's implied the living "paintings" are created automatically by magic.
>>214966754They have music (e.g. The Weird Sisters, Celestina Warbeck), they have talk radio, they have books (e.g. Gilderoy Lockheart), and they have art (paintings, tapestries, sculptures).The only paintings that might be created automatically are dead Hogwarts headmasters. Or they could be commissioned when they get the job and hidden under an invisibility spell cast by the headmaster, so they get revealed when they die.I doubt any of them bother with muggle media as electronics don't work around magic, plus general prejudice against muggles.
>>214966754Arthur definitely has a huge muggle hentai doujin collection but muggle interests are considered "woke" by the traditionalist population
Complete garbage.
>>214966113Case in point.
>>214966162(You)
I'm smart. Would I enjoy this film?
>>214965260The other Sydney is better
>>214965847Pretty much
>>214966960>>214966977
Would you do this for $10,000?
>>214966960kek is that Ari Gold?
>>214967041Sucking her foot and $10,000? Count me in.
>>214967041I don't have that kind of spare money
Rate just her acting ability
>>214964914Without a bra her tits would be a saggy mess
>>214967273But they aren't. We have demonstrable proof they aren't.
>>214964914I have only seen her act on snl and commercials.6/10
>>214967247>Hendricks, Denning'syeah>JohanssonReally?
>>214967247Scarletts boobs were never THAT good retard. Sweeney mogs her there, although prime Scarlet was an objective 10/10. Hendricks never got any roles until she was already close to the wall, I would have KILLED to see her in Dead or Alive the movie. God damn, that movie was good. Dennings has not got great tits, i mean, i wouldnt complain at all if i was her partner, but theres a reason she's never appeared in a bikini in public, they'd look like shit.
Are there any redeeming qualities to this film or is it another humiliation ritual kamalacore holdover?
>>214966696>is it another humiliation ritual kamalacore holdoverit's exactly that
>>214966696Nope and never will. I don’t condone race mixing, especially with subhumans.
>>214966997>didn’t like Boogie Nights You’re dead to me. Fuck off and die.
>>214967264This man goes on Christmas adventures
>>214966997if TWBB is the only PTA movie you like, them you probably won't like this one either. other than the Johnny Greenwood score, it's more Tarantino-esque and similar to Boogie Nights or Inherent Vice than something like TWBB or The Master. that said, I thought it was a great thriller, really enjoyed it. if you are somebody who will get upset just because there are leftist characters in the movie who are kind of sympathetic, then don't bother. but despite the leftist overtones, I really wasn't thinking about politics during it, I just got sucked into the world and the tension. but I know some people can't look past that kind of thing, and if you're asking this question I have to imagine that's you, so it will probably just make you angry.
Was it kino or slop?
>>214966528Any webms request?
>>214966528It was surprisingly decent. I expect much worse.
>>214966877The first half was decent but the second half was retarded and lazy. It put too much onus on she is a witch so I aint gotta explain shit
>>214966800bump
>>214966906The witch part is what made the film interesting to me. I'm glad it wasn't about hordes of 'scary' children running around with their arms out like retards.
OK, he has some skill.
>>214960771Wasnt it supposed to be encounter with previous imperfect remnants of the matrix?
>>214960923Watch the movie before posting bullshit
>>214966593Maybe they were hoping it was a temp glitch
>>214966593agents never had a reason to turn off their auto aimbots until Neo figured out what their RCON password was
>>214965562>>214965543Got it, based
How long until decent AI movies are possible?i.e. When will we be able to go...>Computer, generate me a fantasy action movie featuring John Cena, Sofia Loren and Fred Astaire... and it will just create one for you for, say, $5?Would you watch an AI movie, anon?>Thread vibe:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmLR3k6R1gE
>>214966556Oh, gotcha>23% of consumers are USA>22% of consumers are UK>22% of consumers are AUS>19% of consumers are JAP>18% of users are GERwhew, I'm glad all 104% of users are first worlders.
>>214966580No, the % of consumers in that specific country, you fucking retard. Are toddlers customers, for example? You fucking idiot, neck yourself.
>>214966597Consumers of what, you hyper-aggressive retard? I'm pointing out that it is unspecified. Consumers of the internet? Consumers of 4chan? Consumers of chatGPT (which is the immediate go-to for charts like this, but not this one).It also says "in select markets," and I also would like to know what that means. I have two friends with jobs that require chatGPT usage - one for use in HR reports, the other in code checking for IT. Is it 23% of the USA IT market? It's a picture that says nothing without the rest of its own context. Without knowing the market its polling, it is saying nothing. And knowing the market it's polling, what the hell does it say? "USA uses chatGPT over half of what India does in that specific market"? Riveting. How does that apply to 4chan, hobbyists, or whatever the hell you or that poster was complaining about in that post.
>>214966659Consumers are consumers. Jesus fucking Christ. Learn economic terms before discussing economics, you dumb fuck.
>>214967351So you don't know what they're talking about, making wildly wrong assumptions, and trying to talk down from that position. Gotcha. You were better off not replying.
>behold! The biggest flop of 2025 incoming
>no Hedlund, Wilde, or Boxleitner>dragging Bridges out of the nursing home for a nonsensical cameo>no Daft Punk, instead you get Nine Inch Nails-on-a-chalkboard>mostly takes place in the boring-ass real world with a generic ass invasion plot>JARED LETOOf course it's going to fucking flop
>>214966346>it's trooning timeI feel like it's pretty far from what the original tron was about
>>214966706She cute.Name?
>>214966671>>no Hedlund, Wilde, or BoxleitnerAh yes, the moneymakers of Hollywood, truly that's the star power that was needed to prevent this flopping...
Tron has never been a popular or successful franchise
>tfw not invited to the zombie dance party
>>214967066>this made boomers piss and shit their pants
>>214967066The indian version is much more entertaining.
8A well-placed source tells me that Amazon is quietly pushing for Jacob Elordi as a contender for the next James Bond, though no formal offer has been sent out, and we’re still a long ways away from official casting. Elordi will likely have a screen test next year, the usual tuxedo fit and action scene.https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2025/9/30/amazonmgm-wants-jacob-elordi-to-play-james-bond
>>214966629Is he really gay?
isn't he a bit too young?
Elrodi is okay but it is funny how hard he is carried by height. Like you can see images of him from Wuthering and if you imagine he were 5'9 in those pics you know his sex appeal would be tanked immediately. He simply doesn't have a pitt, young Leo, delin, young Depp, etc x factor with his face alone
>>214966629>latinx BondJust no.
>>214967292I dunno about you, but to me he looked like a gigachad in Saltburn. Normally I don't bother noticing, but he really lucked out with his genetics.
