[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/tv/ - Television & Film


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>David Lynch movies aren't about the plot bro. Haha, don't be like cinemasins. There's no meaning, it's all about the vibes maaaaan.
>O.K I wasn't vibing with his flick
>wtf! You're too dumb to get Lynch. You didn't even take acid and meth while watching him! LAAAME. He's too deep for you! I'm gonna sooo post about this on Letterboxd.
>>
>>
>>200555396
Yes, his movies suck but his target audience are early 20s hipsters too cool for Star Wars or James Cameron which is who also populate this board
>>
>>200555396
you are not a movie buff unless you've eaten 5g of dried psilocybes to Eraserhead on loop whilst sealed in a darkened room
>>
>>200555396
if you don't like his films and don't get anything out of them then don't watch them, it's pretty simple
>>
>>200555396
Twin Peaks is shit
Blue Velvet is peak



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.