>>200701773
What it sets out to do is too theoretical: highlight the pov we usually don't see in slashers. It is a bit boring but still worth watching

it was ok, certainly a good effort for the budget.
the kill of the slasher slayer ranger at the end was really fucked up and even kind of contemplative.

>>200702038
consensus view
cool idea, executed poorly due to dull fuck canadians

>>200701773
utter trash

Not sure how you could do it properly and also keep a 1½ hour runtime, but this was without a doubt the dullest movie I've watched in years.

If you're watching it for the gore, there are better movies that serve that together with an actual plot.

>>200702038
>highlight the pov we usually don't see in slashers
but Psycho did do that and it was the first slasher

>>200702038
Showing the killer's POV isn't really the core idea, the film's more concerned with showing us long uninterrupted shots. Lots of aspect-to-aspect.
It's decently executed on a technical level but it's cargo culting techniques of better films without understanding why they work.

>>200703685
>Not sure how you could do it properly and also keep a 1½ hour runtime
Vary the pact of action appropriately to build and release tension. Have characters lose/gain the upperhand using non-retarded writing [SPOILER]like that shit where the ranger hands the idiot the gun within arms reach of the killer[/SPOILER].

I liked it.

>Movie called In a Violent Nature
>Complains about the shots going too long showcasing nature
It's in the title of the movie, God damn