YOU KNOW HIS NAMEYOU KNOW HIS NUMBER
>>200710474Only Dalton is bond
>>200710515I'm a Moore man myself.
>>200710571He is very good too, brings his own style of Bond
>>200710474thought that was charlie day for a second, from the thumbnail.Now there's a Bond i could get behind.
Still not confirmed. Is there a bigger cuck in Hollywood now than ATJ? He and his publicists tried to get the rumor mill going and Broccoli has stayed silent, kek.
>>200710610This is my ranking. What do you think?
>>200710515that's the chick from road warrior btw
>>200710757He's filming a movie and they don't even have a director so of course they'll keep hush hush but he is the new Bond. That's an open secret. Sites like Deadline would never report on baseless The Sun assumptions if it wasn't true.
This dude killed his chance at a Bond career by starring in Kraven. He has to be the biggest idiot in Hollywood. We all know why he hasn't been confirmed. It's because Eon is waiting for Kraven to come out so they can judge it if will kill ATJ career or not. If it does, no one will want to watch Kraven as Bond.
I'd rather they wait another 2 years than pick him. Thankfully, it seems like the complete lack of anyone giving a shit killed his chances.
>>200710868It doesn't matter. The actor playing Bond is besides the point. Daniel Craig was a nobody who's biggest role was in Tomb Raider, for fuck's sake. The character is bigger than the actor. If anything, Kraven flopping means that they have leverage over him and he will dance along to their tune.>>200710874That's the kind of reaction you want. Low expectations almost always are payed off.
>>200710976Daniel Craig wasn't the leading man in any box-office bombs. He was coming off of Layer Cake, a highly respectable Gangster film.
>>200710474I like the Blond one betterblonde/blond e for women no e for men
>>200711326True but I doubt it'll matter. Like I said, it's advantegeous for them that Kraven bombs. Sony delayed it because they know he's the new Bond and want to profit off of people's interest in him after he's announced. That needless delay right after the leaks pretty much confirmed his casting.
>>200711719>Kraven was delayed because Sony has insider knowledge of when the Bond announcement is taking placeNice cope, lol. Kraven was delayed because Madame Web bombed and I bet Kraven was very similar to Madame Web in execution. They're trying to figure out how to edit the movie or reshoot it. Because audiences have now been burned twice by Sony on Morbius and Madame Web. No sane person is going to see Kraven in theatres and not expect a shitfest.
>>200712049Probably the truth but I do stand by this. His other roles have no bearing on Bond. Bond is that bulletproof. They cast a random nobody who looked like Putin as Bond and they made billions because it's Bond. It matters squat what ATJ did before Bond.
>>200710515https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5V15wNflslc
>>200710623I'm a bit of Bond man, myself.
>>200710757nobody wants to hire that retard cavillno one.
>>200710515what a chud
>>200710800Your Craig hate is gay, but not as gay as your CR67 hate
Just rewatched all the bond movies. Haven't seen any since I was like 13. They never really rose beyond a 6 or 7/10 for me. It's like, they're too cartoony in their action and villains to really truly be for adults. But also too much political intrigue for kids to get into.They're a weird middle groundEither way they were still fairly good. I mainly just don't like when it gets bogged down in political intrigue exposition . I like the ones when they lean into the cartooniness . Die another day, moonraker, spy who loved me, all good. License to kill was good too for dropping the political part and it just being a revenge movie. Also loved how dark tim Dalton was in it
>>200710474why do these words ring a bell in my mind? like they are lyrics to a song?
