How do you justify this?
>>201691159Justify WHAT, op? Use your words.
Wtf, they are different? NOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>201691159how can this be a complaint when the movie takes place 30 years after the first one?
>>201691159The middle image for 209 looks okay. The two on the flanks are indicative of how modern directors can't recreate the lived-in feel of earlier movies. Even Scott had difficulty with recreating the Alien atmosphere in Prometheus.
>>201691571>middle image for 2049 looks okay
>>20169115930 years passed.>>201691571This is a real problem in modern cinema as a whole, but I would argue that it actually works here. The fact that K's space doesn't look lived-in, as you say, like Deckard's, reflects the fact that he's a replicant who is aware of being a replicant and who isn't really comfortable in his own skin. Similarly, the relationship between K and his chief is different from that between Deckard and his, and that difference (as well s the differences between those chiefs themselves) is reflected in the contrast between their offices.Also changing times and tastes, both living spaces and offices tend to go through cycles: what looks cozy to one generation is cluttered to a later one, and what looks clean, neat, and efficiently minimalist to one generation looks stark, sterile, and empty to a later one. Both movies largely reflect the time period in which they were made as much or more than any specific vision of the future. Regardless of the flying cars and the futuristic outdoors shots, neither was particularly imaginative when it came to these interiors. Even these shots from the original are spaces straight out of the early 1980s, just with weird lighting to alter the mood.
Because digital is fucking shitEverything is too clean, there are no crushed blacks nor any variation in the perfect sterile lightingIt looks good for an Apple commercial or a Malick perfume ad movie but absolutely not for a cyberpunk movie
>>201691571>>201691608I mean it fits K's life. He's an NPC basically. So his apartment being empty and sterile is good "symbolism".
>>201691159Now post some shots from the rest of BR2049, it was an incredibly good looking film.>>201694087>Everything is too clean, there are no crushed blacksThis guy is really saying crushed blacks are a good thing
>>201691159Deckard is human, K is a replicant
>>201691159villeneuve makes such slop
>>201696979Crushed blacks are good in a movie, dumdumIt's what makes the "cinema look"
>>201693959the world of the first blade runner wasnt cluttered and messy because it was the style of the time, it was because earth was dying and only suckers lived there anymore. i wasnt paying close attention to the new one but it didnt look like anything had improved except now all the sets are empty sterile and spotless.
How do you justify your scifi hero star wearing a shitty cheap tshirt from walmart?
>>201697153this. soulless director.
