based or cringe?
>>201713771Anyone who says cringe is just a seething non-bong.
>>201713771people don't want to admit that mel gibson flicks are literal fantasy movies that has no basis in historical events
>>201713798most people are biased towards their own country, it's just that when brits or americans make biased claims, the rest of the world can hear it and seethesjust look at how since indians have invaded the internet we are suddenly hearing how india was the richest country on earth before the evil brits plundered it, despite the fact it was only a geographic concept before them and similar indian propaganda
anyone who rants behind the guise of an animated avatar is impossible to take seriously
>cartoon avatar folding armsIf you say this isn’t cringe you’re retarded
>refuses to review actually interesting movies and shits out another narcos video in your path
>>201713771I've brainwashed my two nephews with gay sissy hypno porn, they're both in my goon cave drooling and barely even human beings anymore. I'm going to milk them both this evening. We have a bi weekly milking now, their teen balls are working hard for daddy's special remedy, a cum smoothie.
>>201713771>Be me>Boot up Skyrim>Fire up History Buffs videoGrazie Signore
>>201713984India's nationalism is really out of control, they were assassinating activists in Canada and attempting assassinations on targets in the US. It's all downplayed because they Western governments still think they can become friendly China.
>>201714006t. Mel Gibson
>>201714063Slava Ukraini.
>>201713771He bans me every time I tell him to review The Woman King
max derrat for me.
>>201713771this part of his videos is based, the rest is cringe
>>201713771Is he jew aware? If not, no
Cringe, he was seething when he was reviewing Apocalypto for the same reason all leftists were
>>201716383it's a very ugly and drab movie. a fun watch but if you're going into it expecting accuracy you'll find nothing. it's just pulp
>>201713771Very cringe and at least one time he lied about reading the book the movie he was reviewing was based on.
>>201716596Its a perfectly fine film, Pedro
>>201713771Why does it take 9 months to make a review?At least with Narcos it is somewhat justified, not with your average 2 hour movie.He has million subs now, Couldn't he afford to hire someone to co-research with him to make the process faster?
>>201716383I remember seeing that review, only thing of his I watched. If he's going to seethe at an interesting story in an underutilized setting which uses actual tribals as actors just because it's filled with historical inaccuracies then he better be just as snippy for the dozen or so adaptations of British "history" that replace everyone with blacks. If he has the balls to do that I'll respect him as a history autist, otherwise he's just a snivelling nerd that only criticizes what is deemed safe.
