>dude I'll just sentence a noble lord to execution based on the words of some peasant, with no proof whatsoever and no trialWhy did this retard think this was a good idea? Even if Beric succeeded, it would spook all the other nobles. How was this any better than what got the Mad King deposed?
>>201761880"Answer for his crimes" doesn't necessarily guarantee an execution. He could've just as easily had the Mountain sent to the Wall.
>>201761942It hardly matters. You can't just strip a noble of his property or sentence him with no proof in a medieval society. This is how you get rebellions
>>201761996If said noble is terrorizing peasants without the leave of their King then, yeah, you absolutely can and should strip them of property / rank as a Medieval bureaucrat.
>>201762084You have to have a trial. Nobles were a protected class all over medieval Europe.Unless the king himself or his judicial representative saw the crimes, but even then it's a bit fishy.
>>201761880>The Mountain>Not being guiltyLiterally every noble knows how much of a savage psychopath he is. If a bunch of peasants made it all the way to King's Landing to say he did it, in all probability The Mountain did it.
