What objectively went wrong with this boring ass plotless snoozefest piece of shit of a movie?
>>201797892Absolutely nothing except retards not being able to get past the title.
pol b8 thread where a homosexual russian man cries about journalism, black soldiers and no pro radical message
>>201798064>le black and white pictures taken with a shitty camera are so le powerful*yawn*
>>201797892watch the superior 1997 onehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7GuAEZGXFU
>>201797892They totally ignored the factors that would actually kick off a civil war, as well as the makeup of the country in which said civil war is taking place.
it's an undercooked psyop moviea missed opportunity in terms of actual filmmaking, but the images of a new american civil are there from beginning to end. that's all they really cared about
>>201798064Yes moshe we know you're raiding
I loved the DC part, everything else was kinda slow
>>201797892>expected a well shot war film with some leftist bias>got le journalists good propoganda slopAnd it was boring. The only good part was that jailbait looking girl.
They thought people would see journalists as heroes and not as lying bastards.We needed more scenes of militia killing people and dumping them in mass graves.
>>201797892Hitler's spirit is rising from the grave.
The focus on the journalists was a mistake. It was really boring.
>>201798180the thing is all her photos would have looked like shit without proper lighting and setup. all of them would have been a bunch of blur in low light conditions.>t. amateur analogue photo fag
>>201797892The president was too much of a buffoon to pull off any of the shit he did prior to the plot
>>201797892It wasn't Shattered Union.
>>201797892Cailee's ass was so good, I forgot that the movie had a plot. 10/10 for the ass. 2/10 for the story. overall 6/10
>>201797892Very poor understanding of economics.
>>201797892I liked this movie. I guess it just didnt contain enough political messaging for you americucks though?
