Ghost Dance - 4.3/10 on IMDBDial D for Demons - 4.7/10Shanks - 5.5/10Mind Benders - 5.3/10Mystere - 5.5/10A Taste for Fear - 4.8/10Sweets from a Stranger - 5/10All for the low cost of $265. Seriously when are these scammers going to be sent to jail? At this rate it is straight fraud what they are doing. None of these films even constitute as watchable movies.
>>204062602Jay Bauman's America
>>204062602>IMDB scores
>>204063062Literally never wrong.
>>204062602forgot The Tenant, probably their most high prestige release to date. Actual classic
>>204062602Look at it as a business model:>Buy rights to make and release disc of movies nobody wants. Nice and cheap.>Put discs in slick cases. Nice and cheap.>Market them as 'So bad it's good' Saturday night fodder for film needs.>Charge premium prices. Ya know, because exclusively license and hard to come by original prints and shit or whatever.>Make profit.
>>204062602I hate these guys lmao, all this effort for such shit garbage D-tier movies when they could be doing abandoned classics like the entire Fox catalog
>>204063280nobody gets Fox stuff without Disney approval
>>204063256Too bad they are moving to mainstream shit now. They gonna bring out shit 500 companies already did.
>>204063263>hard to come by original printsYes. Oftentimes they're scanning from the only known print.>>204063280Disney owns Fox and isn't going to just willy nilly give their IPs away. VS doesn't get to just put out whatever movies they feel like, they have to pay to get the rights first. Besides Wall-E on Criterion I don't think Disney's let anybody touch their catalog shit since the Anchor Bay days 25 years ago.
>>204062602you don't get it, they're bad on purpose
>>204063461They're literally not. I remember when tons of these came out first run. They're just regular bad movies. You guys are so fucking stupid.
>>204063461>>204063487They still have more soul than modern cg and digitalshit
>>204063659Wrong.
>>204064133>actually defending modern movieslmao, mind-broken
And you won't give them a chance at the possibility of never meeting your favorite movie of all time. You outsource 100 percent of your consciousness to the hive mind, not only that, you seem to be proud of this.
amuses me how 50 years from now there will be a streaming service made up exclusively of the low to mid budget, catalog filler slop that netflix/prime are putting out right now.
>>204066102but it will be twice the price of other streaming services and have a really sleek artistic streaming feel to it. Maybe even limited registration, after all they have the underrated vintage classics!
>>204066174I'm pretty sure is some shill at this point trying to boycott them for some reason
>>204066102>>204066126This won't happen because no one is actually watching any of these movies, there are 10s of thousands of films made today with no audience. There are no hidden gems. Why VS works is people remember all its releases from back in the video store days.
>>204066427>There are no hidden gemsread between the lines: none of VS releases are hidden gems either
>>204066174Because the guys operating it are clearly sex perverts of some kind.Likely pedophiles, it's pretty obvious.
>>204066459VS has released road house and showgirls, they just love releasing d movies instead for some reason
>>204066498That would not surprise mehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJHxtiWUqt4
>>204066209It is probably VS themselves doing viral marketing
>>204062602>Ghost DanceFUCK YES.It has been on my Blu-Ray wishlist for a while now.https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/text/Blu-ray%20wishlist%20ghost%20dance/Solid low key but comfy underrated moody slasher. WAY too darkly lit on VHS.Great double murder in a museum sequence. Decent shower scene.
>>204062602>>204067412Not just me, here is a review that gave it 3 & half out of 5 stars.https://www.hysteria-lives.co.uk/hysterialives/Hysteria/ghost_dance.htm
>>204067412Where the hell did you see these movies let alone have it on your "wishlist"
>>204067522Bought on VHS years ago.Either off Amazon or from pic related.
>>204067522nta, but they used to have these things called "video stores."we'd rent movies, but the people distributing them generally didn't even try to make the product look good, the transfers were awful, cropped, the sound bad... half the popularity of these boutique label releases is people getting to see what a movie they saw 30 years ago is actually supposed to look like for the first time.
>>204067613Interesting, so are any of them worth seeing or it's all nostalgia?
>>204067660There's thousands of these releases. Some are some of my favorite, some are complete crap. I have no idea what you like, i'd imagine if you have any interest in this kind of stuff you would already be watching them.
>>204067412>>204067482https://youtu.be/vp4POzLcF7Yhttps://youtu.be/OFhKLh616vg
>>204068599Oh my GAWD THE CAMERA NEGATIVESWE RESCUED THEMNOW YOU CAN WATCH A 3/10 MOVIE AT A LOW COST OF $50 PLUS SHIPPING
>>204068768I'm so grateful nobody pays any attention to what you think
>>204068768You make fun but they have soul.
>>204062602>All for the low cost of $265you don't have to buy them.
>>204062602>7 movies for the price of a manhattan bar tabseems reasonable
