Hittin' the tranya early editionSeriously, Fuck Wil: >>214345880
star trek sex with shran
Wow Roddenberry hitting all the racist notes with his casting lol
>>214360609There's my guy.
>>214360603I always thought Clint had some kind of disease but apparently he's just a lil ugly nigga.
>>214360633this, when I think of white people I think of alien babbies.
star trek vic mignogna kissing a visibly discomfited shran at tekkoshotacon
>>214360646I noticed by whatever age he was in this episode you could see he already had a filling in like every other tooth
>>214360638Can we pause for a moment and talk about what a lazy piece of shit WebTrek was? Your series finale is a damn clip show done after hours when the only guys available are background/stand-in and the guy who already has the sunk cost of wearing makeup? A CLIP SHOW?
>>214359981>>214360071I was responding to the claim that 5 seasons on streaming was some sort of minimum. Then both of you tried to move the goalposts.
I think Chekov SUCKS
>>214360603That twist was genuinely surprising and I didn’t watch the episode until I bought the BD set as an adult.
star trek pon farr with dr selar
Gene Roddenberry's Andromeda sex with Gene Roddenberry.
Now THIS is hallway.
>>214360690Good thing proper Star Trek would never stoop that low. Even during a budget crisis and writer strike. On an unrelated note, did anyone else think Peak Performance was a mediocre season finale?
>>214360692it is for ips with an already successful brand name attachedupper deckers wouldnt have gotten 5 seasons if it didnt have the trek title slapped on as an afterthought
>>214360690Webster was a little asshole who destroyed Alex Karras' dream of a fun sitcom with his wife. He got a clip show because everyone had had enough of him.
>>214360720It was very self-aware of them. They're counting on the fact that you think their aliens always look fake as shit so when you see a clearly fake as shit alien, you think it's real instead of being the obvious puppet it is.>>214360690Some shows get Fat Rikered, other shows get Worfed. The TNG reaper comes all the same.
>>214360753You mean Shades of Gray? Peak Performance was great
>>214360760"The Peripheral" was based on William Gibson's popular "Jackpot" trilogy. I'd call that a successful brand name attached. So why only 1 season? You may need to face the simple fact that you've lost this argument, and that Lower Decks making it to 5 seasons was a ringing endorsement of the show.
skant spotted
NuTrek set the series run of all Treks to 5 seasons as a humiliation ritual for ENTbros
This rages Trekkies I guess...No wonder everyone thinks you all are Fucking hateful Boomers watching the same reruns over and over again.
>>214360852Many households had piece of shit 20 inch black and white CRTs in 1966 so they didn’t have to make the thing super realistic looking. Watching the episode at night on a 50 inch 1080p display was a treat.
>>214360967These fags should all be flatheads, ENT canonised that they were flat rather than just pretend they were always ridged. More inaccurate NuSlop.
>>214360885nobody's ever heard of either of those things
>>214360967I lowkey loved the musical episode
did you guys know that Weyoun
Why are nutrekkers and oldguards always at loggerheads?
>>214361045DS9 and TNG are my faves, but I still like SNW and LD. Does that make me a nutrekker?
>>214361035Pretending to speak for others, when you're only speaking for yourself, is one of the classic signs of being a sociopath.Allow me to educate you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Peripheral
>>214361116According to some schizos, yeah
>>214360672Dwarfism has a lot of potential knockon effects like poor bone growth, limited range od movement, eyesight and hearing problems, pretty much anything, they tend to die pretty young, too, especially back then. We've got a lot more preventative care now.
>>214361045there are newtrekkers?
>>214361116No, it makes you sensible. The oldtrek geezers make up arbitrary rules about what is and isn't "real" Trek (2009 is usually the cutoff) but never explain their logic, and can't cite any examples of why "nuTrek" isn't worthy other than "homo faggot tranny seethe seethe seethe". They can prove me wrong any time they like.
>>214361122you should take your own advice then cuz you're constantly projecting
>>214361133Clint Howard is not a dwarf, he's the same height as Bill Shatner.
Ah, the 90s, when there was still optimism for the future
>>214361159Cite specific examples.
>>214361149I watched lower decks and I found the dialogue very try hard. I can like newer stuff more broadly like blue eye samurai, but the writing on Lower decks in particular was just repellent. the artstyle didnt help. I havent watched SNW yet.
wtf space camp is based
>>214360690I find it very funny because Webster was a dogshit show that had no right attaching itself to Star Trek. The kid was an acting trainwreck, Cosby kid reject ass goober. Christ, even Family Matters or Dinosaurs would be more deserving.
>>214361235That's an unverifiable generality. What made it "tryhard"? And how many episodes of LD did you watch before reaching this conclusion?
>>214361287If anything it's pretty indicative of what they thought of TNG at the time until it forced everyone to take it seriously as a television drama.
>>214361170Jesus, that's some unfortunate genetics then. Dude looks just like one at 7yo. Glad he used it to his benefit and is a successful actor, but man, I hope he's got one of those good Hollywood doctors.
>>214361287The Webster/STTNG crossover episode was made solely for production convenience. Don't read too much into it.
>>214361362He's 66 years old, married, and has a kid, so that sounds pretty successful to me.
>>214361362>unfortunate genetics He's Bryce Dallas Howard's paternal uncle
>>214361116it means you have room to improve your taste
>>214361197Millennials were the last generation whose parents thought would have a better future than they had. That’s another less obvious reason birthrates have collapsed. Star Trek was made when people were excited their children might become astronauts. Now we hope our kids will have jobs at all.
Should I watch DS9 alongside the later seasons of TNG or is it too serialised? All the mallfag posting has me eager to start watching.
honestly, TNG is not funny. even the "funny" moments are just...mostly lame
>>214361235Agreed. LD has that unfunny postmodern 'everything must be some form of irony' millennial stank on it.
KLINGONS lay EGGS???
>>214361502Yeah you can absolutely watch them concurrently, one could even say it was intended
>>214361530The only episode I would genuinely consider funny is the one with the Deanna cake, but that was mostly just aping the trappings of Alice in Wonderland. Really made me laugh the first time.
>>214361530TNG has some belly jigglers
>>214361541Hardly "everything". How much of LD have you actually watched? I've watched it over several times. It has its humorous moments, but it's couched in real Star Trek sci-fi drama. Can you cite counterexamples?
Klingots.
>>214361502You only need the first five seasons of TNG. Early DS9 MotW episodes are all the TNG scripts that didn’t make it to production.
>>214361530TNG is deeply funny if you bond to the characters like they're your co-workers. Riker always makes me laugh for some reason. His scream when Worf killed Duras killed me. That and "DATAAAA SOMETHING'S GOT MEEE", "YOU'RE A DEAD MAN APGAR", and just his general smug demeanour.https://youtu.be/tuvLUgdt5Pw?feature=shared&t=151
>>214361703well I don't like Riker so, no
>and then he said nutrek is good
>>214361614>>214361634I don't have a list handy, but the moment in "The Neutral Zone" where the 20th century lady passes out from shock after seeing Worf was pretty funny,. Same for Data's mimicking of Commander Hutch in "Starship Mine", and Data learning how to tap dance for a wedding in "Data's Day". Or pretty much everything about Okona. Or pretty much everything about Riker in "A Matter Of Honor", especially "one at a time, or both of them together?" I could go on.
>>214361703One of the funniest moments in all of TV is picrel. Nothing will ever convince me otherwise.
All this 90s optimism is making me incredibly sad now. Especially since I remember living it.
>>214361753unification when the Klingons give Picard and Data quarters with only one bed
>>214361725How can you not like Riker? That's like saying you don't like Kirk. Riker is basically the Kirk of TNG. The scene in "A Matter Of Honor where he demands the Enterprise surrender was absolute gold.
>>214361877what changed to make Them so invested in making us all miserable and hating each other?
>>214361943Riker is not like Kirk. Riker is boring as fuck.
>>214361877Just remember that the '90s "optimism" was based on the wealth effect of a dot-com bubble, which burst disastrously in June and July of 2000. The optimism was always false.
>>214361944Divide and conquer strategy
>>214361967Does that make you an oldtrek geezer that disavows TNG? I think Riker is a great character.
>>214361998>I think Riker is a great character.well that doesn't surprise me at all
>>214361944Nothing changed, you're just depressed
>>214361944(((They))) are quickly moving towards not even needing most of us anymore, AI just needs to improve a bit more then that's it
>>214361703>>214361764A Matter of Perspective was one of the funniest Trek episodes ever. You have the absurd plot, the campy acting, the cold open where Picard nearly starts the Fourth Reich. Reaction images galore. This is TNG firing on all cylinders.
>>214362025So you ARE an oldtrek geezer that disavows TNG, then?One of my favorite Riker moments is in the episode "First Contact" where, after having sex with an alien woman in a society that has barely discovered warp, tells her "I'll call you the next time I'm in your star system". LOLOLOLOL
>>214362054Anyone that can be replaced by AI wasn't worth much to begin with. Fortunately, "they" can still make use of you, as a source of carbon-neutral crude oil.
>>214361235yeah same. i wish that inside job show got renewed instead of decks
Do you consider Portland, OR as Trekkie Mecca?
>>214360852>It was very self-aware of themSee, I've been watching TOS for the first time recently, and it's truly shocked me how clever some of the good episodes are. I thought the Menagerie two-parter (which reuses footage from the pilot) was incredible, not really because of the writing in itself, but because of the way it recycles material in a way that feels cool and coherent.
>>214362124Inside Job seemed promising, but descended into personal drama far too quickly. I hate when shows rely on personal drama. As far as I'm concerned, the cruise ship episode was the beginning of the end.
>>214361149The show ended with Deep Space 9. The End.
>>214362321Awful, awful taste.
damn this fisherman really sucks so much he put on a fish costume to try and fool other fish into taking his bait
>>214362321The best series wasn't even out yet when DS9 ended, faggot.
Man, Ezri is so much better than Jadzia it's crazy. They should have killed Jadzia in like season 3.
>>214362332Go ahead! Dismiss me! Ad hominem me! It doesn’t matter!
I didn't know Mark Lenard was in the movies....
>>214362321See, that's the sort of seething opinion, disguised as objective fact, that drags this general down into the mud. This is your subjective taste, no more. Speaking for myself, I could never warm up to DS9; it was basically a soap opera in space, and I have no interest in that. I even tried watching the highly-rated episodes (skipping seasons 6 and 7 completely...I long ago became bored with military sci-fi), and still couldn't find anything to interest me. I liked much of TOS; I appreciated the "Wagon Train in space" motif, together with a healthy dose of "Outer Limits", though some episodes annoyed me to distraction. TNG had good parts, but was largely "social workers in space". Still, I found enough to enjoy that I consider myself a Trek fan. I refuse to succumb to the cringe that is being a Trek critic.
>>214360690Forget Webster, how about Frasier?https://youtu.be/BIeEyDETaHY
>>214361045>loggerheadsI'm sorry, Fucking what!? Is this some Fucking Zoomer TikTok slang?
I slept through 3 hours of the retrospective, feelsbadman
watching the TNG ep where they get turned into kids, other than that its pathetic the entire bridge crew gets taken over by two ferengi
>>214361116Thay makes you the superior Trekker because you love all Trek.
>>214362834It was cool how Peecard got turned into his nephew René, which could insinuate that he cucked his brother.
>>214362817Probably an English phrase a German like you wouldn't know
tfw still not finished OldTrek so can't form an opinion on NuTrek yet
Goddamn George Takei looks like a zombie and this was what, 20 years ago? kek
>>214362879If Bill doesn't outlive that cringelord diva I don't want to live on this gay earth.
>>214360852When i was watching reruns of TOS when I was younger I didn't see this episode for a long time but I used to bust out laughing seeing his face in the closing credits. And then how later these guys were supposed to be all badass or something, but that fucking face Kek!
>>214362872What are you working on watching right now friendo?
>>214362849His brother probably cucked him as well. It's not hard to do. Look how many partners Beverly has had cum and go.
>>214362927my brain when I hate nutrek
>>214362838See, that's the sort of seething opinion, disguised as objective fact, that drags this general down into the mud. This is your subjective taste, no more. Speaking for myself, I could never warm up to LD; it was basically Rick & Morty in space, and I have no interest in that. I even tried watching the highly-rated episodes (skipping seasons 1-5 completely...I long ago became bored with Joss Whedon dialogue), and still couldn't find anything to interest me. I liked much of DS9; I appreciated the "Frontier Town in space" motif, together with a healthy dose of "Babylon 5", though some episodes were absolute kino. TNG had good parts, and was largely "optimistic explorers in space". Still, I didn't find enough to enjoy to consider myself a NuTrek fan. I refuse to succumb to the cringe that is being a NuTrek shill.
>>214362817You can't understand it by context, bogdan?
Checked George's instagram and it's literally just a wall of Drumpf.
Harry Kim's long hair!
>>214362960Top shelf
>>214363005and Bills?
>>214362960>skipping seasons 1-5 completelylol
>>214363029hes booked and busy despite and always going to shit all around the country its incredible
>>214363019
>>214363029Advertising upcoming appearances with the same photo over and over plus some save the animals stuff. And he's writing a new book!
>>214362960It's like saying oh "I LOVE women!" But then you only Fuck Latinas.
>>214362872you dont need to finish it. go ahead and try watching a few episodes of it now and you'll understand that it is not Star Trek
>Joss Whedon dialogueLiterally has no idea what they're talking about and just trying to stir shit
>>214363076> And he's writing a new book!He’s paying a ghost writer like all his other books.
The commonly touted fallacy of Nu Trek shills is that we hate Nu Trek because "old good, new bad," but the reality is that true Star Trek fans are starved for the real thing. We badly, badly desire Nu Trek to be good but it falls so utterly and disastrously short of what are ultimately reasonable and forgiving expectations that we can do nothing but shake our heads in disgust at the misuse of the franchise.A show like Lower Decks is insulting to our intelligence. It doesn't even matter if it's good (though it isn't) because its very existence is a sham -- an example of shameless profiteering and shoddy market research when Paramount does literally everything in the world except make a post-VOY Star Trek series that carries things forward in the model of what came before.
good good, bad bad
>>214363123Pickle Trekker is always telling us to "go back to r*ddit or bluesky" but he is the one who would feel more comfortable on either of those since he always gets his panties in a wad over "nutrek haters"
>>214363112Absolutely not. His fiction was ghost written, his non fiction is him. He's way too self-absorbed to let someone else do that for him. His autobiographical stuff has co-credits because he dictates it all to the person who records what he said.
>>214362785More like thishttps://youtu.be/UWiH582PcRc?feature=shared
I really hate how they just completely ignore the importance of people like Gene Coon in these documentaries and just suck off Roddenberry the whole time
>>214360603>wasn't even a cute babyWhy did God hate him so much?
the DS9 model was smaller than I imagined
>>214363174Yeah I don't get it. I like LD, I occasionally get shit from you lot about it, so what? I got my big boy pants on. Y'all faggots like Japanimation, taste is subjective. Picklespammer might be better off just actually talking about the shit he likes and filtering the rest. I like anything Kathryn Lyn does. Wej Duj, a Farewell to Farms, and the best SNW eps. Talk about those instead of bitching about others.
>durr you guys like anime and things that are also not as good as Star Trek, so you must also like shitty sub-par Star TrekNo. We can maintain different standards of quality for different things. Whether you like Lower Decks (lol you are a fucking pleb) or not, you should be able to agree with us on one thing: it is not Star Trek. It's a parody of Star Trek, basically a long Robot Chicken episode. But again, it is NOT Star Trek.Their attempts to make actual Star Trek have both been disasters in terms of quality: STD and SNW. Both set in unwanted timelines, both retreading famous old characters instead of actually pushing forward and EXPLORING new ones, both basically just generic science-fiction series but simply branded as being Star Trek.
>complains about anime>comes to a 2ch clone anyway
>>214363360Would have been cool if some TOS oldfags like Fontana and Gerrold stayed on TNG until after it was pried out of Gene's hands. I liked Fontana's DS9 episode.
>>214362960There was no seething opinion in the post you replied to. You are obviously trying to write a parody of >>214362712, but your version has no soul, and is frankly schizo.>>214363123Your seething is nothing but disingenuous generalities. The difference between what you write, and what you're responding to, is that you lack authenticity.
>>214363548I wasn't gonna pay $10 to have my SA account reinstated, lowtax can fuck himself and I hope he burns in hell.
>>214363456This all started with oldtrek geezers spamming "nutrek sucks" and "fuck nutrek" with no context. I'm fine with people having different opinions. But these aren't opinions; these are mean-spirited trolls. And you know it. Your entire argument lacks authenticity.
>>214363580If you can't take it here, perhaps you should consider a transfer to reddit. There's a lot less nutrek hate there.
>>214363580>can't respond to well-reasoned arguments>just tosses insult back, proving he isn't interested in discussion, just trollingOnce again confirming what you're actually here for. Always a pleasure. No more (You)s as you've been sufficiently BTFO by multiple anons for the week.
>>214363526You haven't actually watched LD. You just heard other people seethe about it, and accepted their position wholesale, without any thought. It's painfully obvious.
>>214363623Okay but you have been here long enough to know the rules of the road. The only way to have more of the (legal, rule-abiding) content you want is to make it. If you get into a tit for tat, that's all you get. Be the change you want to see in the world. For my part, I'm bout tree fiddy in quarters.
>>214363650There were no well-reasoned arguments. There was just a bunch of juvenile, uncreative, mean-spirited seething. And you know it. You can't win an argument by pretending to be stupid, no matter how much you wish you could.
>>214363623Oh no! Somebody is being mean and trolling me on *checks notes* ebaumsworld.com! The humanity!
obviously not the real bf btw
>>214363672I've been telling the oldtrek geezers that if they want more of the content they want, they can generate their own with AI text-to-video, but that just sends them down a different path of seething. It's clear they don't have the skills, or the intelligence, to take that route, and feebly attempt to cover that up with a bunch of seething and deflection. It's really sad.
jeez this documentary is from 2007 and Sirtis already looks RUFF
>>214363721AI sucks so much.
what is the name of the doc you guys are watching
>>214363698You missed the updated version of that meme.
>>214363721If it's sad then lighten up the mood by actually discussing what you want. Here's a prompt. Is Ma'aH a better Klingon than Worf?
>>214363721>>214363680>>214363654>>214363623>>214363580Someone needs preparation H for all this butthurt
>>214363735Why would you hate on version 0 of the holodeck? And if you do, why wouldn't you work on improving it? Why don't you just admit you're a brainlet that's incapable of improving on it? I mean, it's pretty obvious.
>>214363764https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0274889/?ref_=ext_shr
>>214363735>Al sucks so much. come now, big beefaroni, you can't have quantum leap without Ziggy and Al
>>214363721>the skills, or the intelligence, to take that routekek, he's an AI jeet who jerks off to cartoons and thinks he's smart because he tells ChatGPT to generate "Troi with big bouncing bobs and vagene"
>>214363808no that's the one that just ended. this one is about a Christie's auction for the 40th anniversary
>>214363780The characters are not in competition with each other. Anyone who thinks that way is a Star Trek critic, not a Star Trek fan. I like Ma'ah for who he is, just as I like Worf for who he is.
>>214363729Marina Sextis looks better post Trek than during it, they made her look all fucked up and talk retarded.
>>214363801Because it is souless shit? In the time it takes you to teach an AI to make ugly souless shit you can learn how to actually draw and create beautiful real and human art made to express human emotions and connect to other humans.
Nightly reminder, nutrek sucks. Not worth watching, not considered trek. There are good trek series. We are all watching and enjoying them. And discussing them here. Do not reply to the spammer. He will do it himself.
>>214363526that's not what he's saying, he's saying the picklespammer has thin skin
>>214363879Yea. I don't care if you want to watch Homo Homo Zero GO!, the premier mecha harem anime, again taste is subjective. But don't be thin skinned, the flip side of free speech is it isn't always a hug box and you need calluses.
>>214363580womp womphttps://youtu.be/CQeezCdF4mk
>Marc Alaimo eas always the best looking Klingon>Michael Westmore just said the reason they have neck ridges is because he had a long neck and he was able to design something to fit that space well there you go
>>214363914>Homo Homo Zero GO!, the premier mecha harem animeIt's called Double Zeta.
>>214363958Do the various mecha suits (AFAB) compete for the affections of famous galactic ace pilot Tenchi Homo?
>>214363954pretend I wrote Cardassian lol
>>214363770your updated version is unfunny and lacks whimsy and soul
>>214363815You're the only one that brings up jerking off. You're projecting hard & lack the self-awareness to realize it.
>>214363623I agree with you. The one of them tried to claim that it's an objective that it "isn't Star Trek." Yes it is. It just means you only like some Star Trek and not all Star Trek. I happen to like all of it except for Picard. Doesn't mean I'm going to claim like a fucking schizo that just because I don't like it that it "isn't Star Trek." Yes it is. It's not LOST. It's not Star Wars. It's not a Broadway show. It's not Farscape. It's Star Trek. It's bad Star Trek, like the musical episode of SNW or Shades of Gray or Beverly Crusher fucking a ghost or Kirk being body swapped with a woman, but it's all Star Trek. There's good and bad Star Trek. I don't mean to keep hammering the point but the geezer I'm not replying to, he just doesn't seem to understand how to define basic things. It's just basic definitions. Lower Decks IS Star Trek. Because it's not anything else. Fucking trolls, I swear. And for the record I'm tired of being bullied by these geezer faggots. I've enjoyed watching Lower Decks all the way through twice now. If you want to insult me, go right ahead.
>>214363972No, but there is straight shota.
>>214363871Assuming for the sake of argument that AI text-to-video is soulless shit, if you can't envision a time when it won't be soulless shit, then that's a skill issue, and you lack vision.
Why did they auction off all of this stuff? That's a big chunk of TV history there. Was Paramount or whoever that desperate for money?
>comes to /trek/>acts like a jackass>receives 1% pushback>"waah waaah I'm being bullied waaah these terrible trolls waaaah"Every. Single. Day.
>>214364038Yes
>>214364026I can't envision a time where something made by a computer is more sincere or more worth my time than something a human made by hand. I guess that makes me a huge faggot? But I've always been a huge faggot.
>>214364049not to mention the mobileposting samefaggery, or the bitter spamming when he has a melty
>>214364038I mean to Paramount it's old decaying trash taking up space in a warehouse so why not. Fans are the only ones who would actually value it
>>214363879Project more, why don't you? The oldtrek geezers are the ones sperging out.>>214363993I try to explain to the geezers the difference between Star Trek fans and Star Trek critics, but they're not grasping it. They may never, but I'm here to minister to the least of my brothers, as the Good Book says. And I agree; I'm tired of their attempts at bullying. Especially since they're so bad at it, and don't seem to realize it. They're like kindergartners trying to push around mafiosi.
>>214363988>>214363993These two posts are 13 seconds apart but I full expect that the geezers have already accused us of being the same person by the time I hit post.
omg the lady in Vorta cosplay. she's me
>>214364092Called it here: >>214364136Not samefagging. Have you seen the ratings for nuTrek? There are more than one of us.
>>214363580I’m glad to see you find a parody so amusing.
>>214364086You're using a computer right now. When was the last time you wrote some prose by longhand? Or drew a picture using paint and pencil? Or expressed your opinion by standing on a soapbox in the town square? Right, never. You've been using computers for that for as long as you can remember. But for some reason you draw the line at AI text-to-video, Not only are you are a world-class hypocrite, but you are obviously so.
>>214364111>The Good BookOh my god its Vic.
>>214364111I have neither the time nor the inclination to argue with them to the length that you do, but I do appreciate the work you do. Nutrek IS Star Trek. And it's not half bad either. (Except for Picard but that's my own personal opinion and if someone else likes it it doesn't bother me)
is this character really necessary?its hard not to skip every scene shes in
>>214364170It was a soulless parody that failed to capture the essence of the original. It was everything you pretend to seethe about. How can you be so blind to your own failings? That takes a special level of cluelessness I can only attempt to understand.
>>214364178Honestly? I have written fanfic before. I haven't published shit in YEARS though. I get embarassed and then just leave it on my desktop.
>>214364049Yeah these nutrek haters are really annoying, I'm just trying to enjoy watching and discussing the retrospectives but they love flinging their shit everywhere
>>214364216Worf looks weird with short hair, i prefer his Walton Goggins look.
Lads, he's getting far too much pleasure out of derailing the thread.time to cut the replies.
Why are Germans so autistic
>>214364214Deal with it the same way you deal with prank callers: don’t respond and hang up.
I love when they cut to Avery Brooks saying half a sentence
>>214364203I agree with you re: Picard. I powered through season 1, and found it to be a soulless nostalgia trip. And despite cherishing pretty much any Cthulhu reference I run across, the "android god" extending his tentacles through the dimensional portal was too much, even for me. And I will continue my work to bring enlightenment to the oldtrek grandpa seethers, because frankly, I enjoy it. I don't think they feel the same level of play that I do, but that's their loss.
Good night crewmates
>>214364224Don't be a pussy. Publish it.
Man I love Klassic Konvention Kringe
>>214364234It's weird how specific their arguments are. They're so convinced about their own correctness. It's like arguing with the Borg. Which is why I usually just sit back but sometimes reading their crap gets too annoying. It's like shut up and talk about Star Trek if you like it so much.
Go make your own thread about it, but we don't want to talk about it here. You can't force us to talk about shit half of us haven't even watched. If you want to talk about LD try /co/.
>>214364224Prose doesn't necessarily mean fanfic. And did you write it with a computer, or on paper? My point still stands... you make things with computers, and are not the old-school purist you claim to be.
>>214364281Godspeed anon
>>214364281Picard Season 1 struck me as being like Caprica: an idea (about emergent AI sentience, no less) that was shoehorned into the Trek universe. Much like Caprica, it was doomed to fail. PIC S2 was ruined by COVID and being forced to film in Modern Day LA, but they could have done something with the "Q is dying and has one last lesson" thing if they led with that. Instead they half-assed it by saying Sure let's do a lame rehash of All Good Things and TVH
>>214364258Pure projection. You're derailing the thread with your "nutrek sucks" seething. I'm merely trying to talk sense into you. It may be impossible, but I enjoy a challenge. Why minister at all, if you're not ministering to the least of your brothers? And you oldtrek geezers are certainly some of the the least I've ever met.
>>214364302They're here because they got kicked off of /co/ I believe. Their threads just get deleted over there.
Why would you even watch SNW or Picard or LD in the first place? Like what made you give this crap a chance?
>>214364277>hurr durr prank callersWow, talk about admitting to being a geezer. I don't even remember the last time I answered my phone when called by a number I didn't recognize. That's a land-line thing from more than a quarter century ago.
>>214364280I keep hoping he's gonna go on some unhinged rant.
>>214364373I watched 3 episodes of Discovery and realized it wasn't Star Trek so I didn't bother trying the other shows especially since they're clearly IP slop and not even original ideas
>>214364373>Why would you even watch SNW or Picard or LD in the first place?curiosity and being awake a lot more than I wanted to be at the time
>>214364286NTA but I've published my Star Trek fanfic on various relevant sites on the Internet. (And yes, as promised, some of the character are based on seething assholes I've encountered in this thread. See if you can find it.) My work gets ignored, but that doesn't bother me. Internet users are drowning in content these days. I subscribe to the "write, publish, repeat" philosophy; the only way I can become known as a writer is to keep trying.
Like I give a shit about what a tripfag thinks. We're in /trek/. We watch trek. If you don't talk about it because you don't watch that's a (you) problem.
>>214364298Actually, I find their arguments to be painfully nonspecific. They say "hurr durr nutrek sucks". I say "cite specific examples". They never do. This is geezer logic, probably driven by a lack of plasticity in their aged brains. They can't change, they can't adapt, they can't appreciate different viewpoints, so they just rant. I'm surprised they haven't called me a whippersnapper and demanded I get off their lawn. Still, they make me happy... at least I'm not them.
>>214364302That argument is specific to LD. But you seethe about any Trek from 2009 onward. So your argument is disingenuous. Again. You're painfully predictable.
This is kinda depressing. They should have just made a cool Trek museum with all that stuff.
>>214364373Let me turn the argument around. Why are you so sure SNW, Picard, and LD had nothing to offer? I've only watched 4 episodes of SNW, but like what I see so far. I powered through S1 of Picard, a.k.a. soulless nostalgia trip, and have no desire to watch any more. But I thoroughly enjoyed LD and have rewatched it several times. You have done none of these things.
>>214364484Is Shadow President and Tribune of the Feebles, Vic Mignogna, a character?
>>214364414You're a wiser man than me. I somehow powered through the first two seasons of DIS and have no idea how I lasted that long.>>214364509Who are you even replying to?
>>214364612I don't have to try fecal matter to know I shouldn't be eating it.
>>214364619No, you're not. Sorry, you're not interesting enough. And I'm not writing "Welcome to Night Vale".
>>214364665ayo dis bitch doesn't know about kopi luwak
>>214364665So, don't confuse you with facts, because your mind is made up? Typical geezer response. You're dramatizing through the lack of plasticity in your brain & don't even realize it. You're in a downward spiral that will only end in the cold grave you crave so much.
>>214364692Computer one civet coffee extra poop made in a french press.
>>214364337Thank you. I only ask you throw me your support when you agree with what I'm saying. The geezers need to realize there's more than one anon that feels this way.
Reminder, this is the level of mental illness you're replying to
>>214364737The fuck you think "leola root" is?
>>214364800You're the only one demonstrating mental limitations. Caused, as I've said repeatedly, by lack of plasticity in your neural matter. I know you're incapable of comprehending that, and yet, still I try. I believe in you, anon, even if you don't.
Because only one person in the entire world uses a certain English word? Retard
>>214364825It's ginger, with extra additions to make it look more "sci-fi".
how much did the Weyoun paraphernalia go for?
>>21436487710 gorillion dollars probably
>he asks if he pronounced Ressikan right (he did) but he mispronounced peecard
>>214360603Always thought it was weird how Kirk just left that goldshirt with this weird guy
>>214364877How much did Kira's shoes go for?
>>214364581Yeah selling these huge famous models instead of going to a museum like "No bloody A, B, C, or D" did is a travesty
To this day, All Good Things... is still the best finale of any Trek ever. I think it is probably a Top 5 finale of all shows ever to be quite honest.
>>214364835Who are you even replying to?
>>214365038it's peak.
>214361297>oh I HAVE A BATLETH OH I HAVE A BATLETH ARG IM AN ANGRY KLINGON ERG >*hits dweeb with Batleth* because shes a spasticIs this supposed to be humourous?>>214364833Why do you call everyone geezer? I just started trek like 2 years ago and I have had zero inclination to watch modern trek slop.
>>214364899>>214364877wha...what? :(
>so rich he bought CRATES of props
>>214362976No, I've never even Fucking heard such a ridiculous term? Loggerheads? Zoomers can't create anything original, so what reference are they even using to create that slang?
Picard:>I'll never put on a star trek suit again that's for sure>
Imagine buying something from NemesisKWAB
>>214365219I mean Sir Patrick Stewart...Also this other dude is so loaded he got two hero ship models, damn
>>214365038I think too what makes it the best finale is that it wasn't a definite ending because they knew they were doing movies. DS9 and VOY had to wrap up the entire show, every character's arc, etc. (and ended up mostly poor)
>>214364208but enough about troi
>>214365307DS9 didn't really /have/ to. Voyager did however just due to its overarching premise.
>>214364269inbreeding + national guilt with no outlet
akoocheemoya bros...
>>214365349AkoocheemoyaOur sacred relics used to feed the white man's greed...Akoocheemoya...
>>214365339>inbreedingThat describes anywhere in Europe, Germany isn't special in that regard>national guiltWeren't they autistic before doing some... things... that caused said national guilt
Warp speed, Mr. Sulu!>Aye aye ciptin, wurp speeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed
>>214365349The bros are happy, it got 10x estimated value
>>214364800jesus christ what a lonely loser lmao
>>214365407That's almost a year old, gotta be near 10k by now
>>214365307even though it doesn't show an "ending" it still manages to give you more closure than the shows that did definitively "end." It's just a brilliant idea brilliantly executed.
>>214365201Hey grandpa, there's this newfangled tool called "Google" that can answer questions like this:https://www.google.com/search?q=define+loggerheads+slang
Wtf is this intro lol
I'm looking through the catalog and I'm surprised they didn't sell those cool Art Deco-ish outfits from the Gabriel Bell episode.
What are some Trek kinos about being caught in feedback loops?
We need a red shirt death compilation
>>214365317How could you skip Troi's scenes? She had boobs and curves. You must be some kind of major faggot.
>>214365038It was so good that the only way they could figure out how to end the PIC dumpster fire was to make a derivative copy of it. There were so many soiboi redditors eating that slop up>omg it's thing I 'member! they care so much about me!!
>>214365457>howbecause her episodes generally fucking suckedbut I never skip anything
How is the Shatman so kino? This documentary is already better than the last one purely because Shatner is in it
>>214365131he keeps trying to force it as a meme because he's an out of touch 70 y/o larping as some kind of cultured genius for watching IP slop
>>214365201It's from logs you fucking retard. The ones made of wood.
>>214365498TrueAlso the last one had a distinct lack of Scott Bakula
>>214365374>Weren't they autistic before doing some... things... that caused said national guiltNot any more so than their neighbors
>>214365451You know you love to see it.https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/212673141#p212678350 https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/212673141#p212678456
>>214365453Man, they really did just blow up a guy didn't they>>214365457She looked better in uniform. Where's the fun if nothing is left to the imagination?
>>214362817Get off my lawn. >t. geezer who hates schizo Mondays
>>214365131How would you even know it's slop if you've never seen it?
this doc is just a clipshow isn't it?
I wonder if that autistic redhead cutie won the backlit Cardassian symbol she wanted?
>>214365572seen the promos and clips of it, it's 102% slop with a 2% margin for error
>>214365522That's a dumb insult. That's like calling someone a quarryhead because they're filled with rocks.
>>214365603Yeah, the quality of actually terrible the longer it goes on. I can hear audio echoing, whenever Shatner walks across the set you hear the plastic floor creaking noisily, kek
>I'm sick to death of logic!Gee maybe you should have thought of that before you married a Vulcan.
>>214365643You a real quarryhead dogg
>>214365702Amanda wanted big green cock but wasn't prepared for the baggage that goes with it
>>214365708kirk would've been able to make a rudimentary lathe
>>214363623Why does it seem these threads are infested with Paramount+ shills who are desperately trying to make it seem that nutrek isn't hot fucking garbage?Here's something you can take to your higher ups: Stop making shit trek, start making good Trek.
Is this guy Mike McMahan having a melter because he's just that defensive over his own creation?
>>214365816Nah if that guy saw somebody type the word "faggot" he'd have like a 3 year meltdown
>>214365816you would think if it was a creator they would be able to extoll its virtues and not just bully people who don't watch it
>>214365844He doesn't think
>and then Doctor King cheated on his wife with me>I sucked his cock right there on the spot while FBI agents filmed from the bushes
>>214365894you can get actors to do anything by blowing smoke up their ass about how important they are
>>214363721Its tough. I tried making a StarTrek:TNG episode from a rough script I wrote up 10 years ago and I gave up after 2 days. The coherence is really the biggest problem. I think it's "close" to being "acceptable", but not quite yet, we need a few more tools to really hit it home.I can see big money being made from legit good fan episodes though if they run a patron.
>>214365572Have watched 4 episodes of LD and I havent seen anything that has catched my attention for SNW. but I might try it at some point.
>>214365894Don't forget Gene cheated on his wife (AND his mistress) with Nichelle, tooBlack pussy man
I love listening to Nimoy talk about Star Trek he seems like more of a real human bean than the others or something idk how to describe it
>>214365992He has less of the average actor's sense of self-importance.You can tell Nichols and Takei in particular are divas.I think Walter Koenig is pretty interesting too. He never seemed to give much of a shit or take the acting gig too seriously. He's a pretty intelligent guy.
>>214365618Must be nice to know everything. I'm sure the CIA pays you major bucks to shortcut their usually lengthy and methodical gathering of intelligence. Or maybe you're just an average, everyday, garden variety seether.
>>214365878fucking kekI got a slap on the wrist from (starfleet command) for telling a (romulan) than nobody was gonna be fooled by his ploy, because apparently it was (not within the confines of mission parameters). The (romulan) wasn't punished at all of course
>>214366020>He never seemed to give much of a shit or take the acting gig too seriously. He's a pretty intelligent guy.He had more fun as Bester on B5 and as the corrupt priest in Mad Cowgirl.
>>214360748he relaxed
I had heard of the Star Trek "first interracial kiss" but what nobody tells is that it's one of 2 rape kisses in a totally feel-bad episode full of cruelty
>>214365878Should've taken a screenshot, that's a legendary self-report
>>214365471The one where she almost throws herself into the plasma stream was pretty good. And the one where she wakes up romulan. When she's doing things besides sitting in her office going hmmm she's not a bad character.
how is tuvok only a lieutenant if he is like 90 something?
>>214366106he both left starfleet and switched vocations at some point iirc
>>214365917It's not easy yet, but there are some stunning examples, all Star Trek related:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4AxM4nUz3Qhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtuI2TxFfBAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eqYswiW4eohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZvr9D-EWLQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxuDLsgWumshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmLR3k6R1gEMaybe they'll convince you to redouble your efforts!
>>214366072Yeah but that totally real Southern guy said he don't cotton to no whites and niggers kissin', unless it's a red-blooded all-American boy and a hot black bitch then it's OK.
>>214366125ah. you would think the admiralty would be full of vulkans with how long they live.
>>214366163maybe they have term limits
>>214366148these are fantastic! I remember the ai harry potter as redneck videos and those were also great.
>tfw sweet spot
>>214366163I mean they are almost every time you get a group of admirals there is a couple vulcans, if you have 3 admirals one at least is always a vulcan
>>214366202You are a good cat, Mayweather.
>>214366202
>>214366244>>214366244>>214366244
Let the record show that the oldtrek geezers got totally pwned, and I stand undefeated.
>>214366517lower deck saars....
>>214362817>>214365201The irony here is just too rich. Some fucking boomer is complaining about not knowing what loggerheads is and blaming zoomers for using it and making it up when it's basically an archaic word that originated from the Renaissance.
