Trekpu Probert Concept EditionPreviously, on /trek/: >>217253849
star trek sex with shran
Commander tell me about your sexual organs.
>>217265083>Would you flash your penis to an androgynous alien?
star trek sex on de beach with shran
trek sex shran with star
>>217264912interesting trekpu image because it's kind of unusual isn't it? usually trekpu is there being his own guy in a scene with others. he's not usually recreating scenes as other characters
thoughts on the demoralization campaign?
FREIGHT
Post riker mental breakdown webm pls
the kazon really knows how to treat woman, its refreshing to see that not all quadrants are pussy-whipped.
>>217253992Mostly episodic with a small overarching plot that, over the course of the season, snowballs into a season ender 2-parter. I'd like to see a decent amount of action, actually I'd quite like a Maquis 2.0 situation, but even bigger in scope. Mirror Terran agent provocateurs create a human-first splinter group that begin taking violent action and attempting to break parts of the federation off, at least for a couple seasons. Could have a really sick cap-off final encounter where the captain and his mirror counterpart battle ship against ship, eventually shattering the mirror ship's saucer ala pic related.
>ALL HANDS PREPARE FOR MULTIBALL!
>>217267750>1 replaces Iunwatchable
>>217264912trekpu is such a whimsical goofball!
>>217268678>imagine the smell
4 days until Academy hits streaming and reviewers say it's the most relevant iteration to date.
>>217268722Motor oil and unwashed pusy
>>217268934>it's the most relevant iteration to dateAh, so everything about it is just modern politics and other modern shit with a thin veneer of Star Trek because the writers couldn't make a successful pitch without setting it within an existing IP.
>>217268722this was the better lookthey could still give her hair though to appeal to cowards
>>217268934reviewers are whores who say whatever they're paid to say
>>217268934The only question that needs to be asked is, "Is this what Gene would want?"
>>217269219Gene would've killed himself during Voyager
What's the Star Trek equivalent?
>>217265083>>217265095I can't help it. Every playthrough Romance her. Always loyal to her in main campaign of ME2
>>217269530https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catspaw_(Star_Trek:_The_Original_Series)
>>217269530
>>217269174The shill can't even be honest about what the paid reviewers had to say: >>217227620>t-they said it's relevantSelective with the truth much? When even early-access "I clapped when I saw it!" YouTubers are saying it takes multiple episodes to even get good (by their standards), you know it's fucking terrible.
>>217269570>William Shatner's Cyber Masterpiece
>>217269477was he allergic to massive tits?
>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>On the Starship Enterprise under Captain Kirk.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>Boldly going forward 'cause we can't find reverse.>Lt. Uhura, report.
i've started watching tng, i'm about 17 eps into the first season. i love the holodeck episodes, do they start exploring that more as seasons go on?
>>217269827>There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow;>there's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, Jim.>Analysis, Mr. Spock.
>>217269848>It's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, not as we know it; >it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, Captain.>There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow;>there's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, Jim.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>On the Starship Enterprise under Captain Kirk.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>Boldly going forward, still can't find reverse.>Medical update, Dr. McCoy.
>>217269836yes, but if you like holodeck episodes voy is the series for you
>>217269836Yes indeed. The holodeck is one reason why S1 isn't as bad as some make it out to be. There's interesting stuff like that right from the start.
>>217269868>It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead, Jim;>it's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead.>It's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, not as we know it; >it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, Captain.>There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow;>there's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, Jim.>Starship Captain, James T. Kirk:
>>217269836Your journey is beginning and /trek/ will be there to help guide you.
>>217269926>Ah! We come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, shoot to kill;>we come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, men.>It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead, Jim;>it's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead.>Well, it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, not as we know it; >it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, Captain.>There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow;>there's Klingons on the starboard bow, scrape 'em off, Jim.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>On the Starship Enterprise under Captain Kirk.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>Boldly going forward, and things are getting worse!>Engine room, Mr. Scott:
>>217269904>>217269923>>217269954thanks frens
>>217269955>Ye cannae change the laws of physics, laws of physics, laws of physics;ye cannae change the laws of physics, laws of physics, Jim.>Ah! We come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, shoot to kill;>we come in peace, shoot to kill; Scotty, beam me up!>It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead, Jim;>it's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead.>Well, it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, not as we know it; >it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, Captain.>There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow;>there's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow Jim!>Ya cannot change the strength Jim of the engines.>It's worse than that, it's physics, Jim.>Bridge to engine room, warp factor 9.>Och, if I give it any more she'll blow, Cap'n!
>wake up hungover to unfunny TOS greentext
>>217269978>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>On the Starship Enterprise under Captain Kirk.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>Boldly going forward 'cause we can't find reverse.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>On the Starship Enterprise under Captain Kirk.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>Boldly going forward, still can't find reverse.
>wake up>resume drinking>post hilarious (to me) greentexthappy sunday /trek/!
>>217270051they shouldn't give trekpu beer.
>>217265578He's smooth like Ocho Rios sand
>>217270096if he can handle a phaser he can handle a drink
I know there are some fans who aren't happy with the new Star Trek, but personally, I think it's fantastic. The characters are complex and interesting, the visuals are stunning, and the stories are engaging. Plus, the representation in the show is amazing - it's great to see a diverse cast that reflects the real world. And as someone who grew up watching Star Trek, it's exciting to see the franchise continue to evolve and expand. I can't wait to see what they come up with next!
>>217270301And it's a lot of Fun!
>>217270301Why?
Yellow AlertShields up
>>217270301Furthermore, the production values are top-notch, with stunning visual effects, intricate world-building, and exciting action sequences that capture the essence of what makes Star Trek so special. The writing is also compelling, with intricate plotlines and nuanced character development that challenges viewers to think deeply about the moral and ethical implications of space exploration.
4 days until disaster
>>217270479For it to be a disaster people would have to care.
>>217270479I doubt if /trek/ will hold.
>>217270454
Star Trek: Starfleet Academy is a breath of fresh air for the franchise, successfully blending the grand optimism of classic Trek with the emotional depth of a modern coming-of-age story. Set in the 32nd century following the reopening of the Academy, the series captures the "prodigious start" of a new generation tasked with rebuilding a fractured galaxy.
>>217270301I like how they embrace the silliness of Star Trek. Star Trek has always been silly and ridiculous!
>>217264674How about if I meet you halfway? Before you talk of becoming the Star Trek showrunner again, how about writing a pilot script for each of these shows? You can post them on AO3; that site allows enough customization to display screenplays properly. Then we can evaluate whether you actually have the chops, or are just a blowhard high on his own farts.
ENTER YOUR COMMAND CODES AND SHUT DOWN THE PROGRAM
>>217270553It's inclusive, relevant and dynamic!
Chief Miles O'Brien
>>217267457I take it you mean STTNG's "Frame Of Mind", but where in that episode do you want the clip?
>>217269827At least post the video link! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Em-M0MOWx-A
>>217270652China O'Brienhttps://youtu.be/EgzjiSocwc8
>>217270753https://youtu.be/QaZmBFTxW9M?si=VSDeuPryU2KbQLdY
>>217270479>>217270506takes another 36-48 hours for them to get the messaging straight before they try and fail shilling here
>>217270789Christ, he looks like McMahan.
Any Star Trek episodes about being gay and Chinese?
>>217270821Can't I talk about good old fashioned Japanese racism without you dragging some unfunny bullshit into it?
>>217270872no u may not
>>217270950Leftists can't meme
>Alexander Hilary Kurtzman (born September 7, 1973) is an American filmmaker. He is best known for co-writing the scripts to Transformers (2007), Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (2009), Star Trek (2009), Star Trek Into Darkness (2013), and The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014) with his writing and producing partner Roberto Orci, and directing and co-writing The Mummy (2017). He made his directorial debut with People Like Us (2012), co-written alongside Orci and Jody Lambert.Jesus wept
>>217271026So what's the source of the demotivational crap on the left in that image? And why do you consider it Scripture?
You Fucking Cocksuckers won't even give this Star Fleet Academy show a Fucking chance! We demand that you watch it and make it Fucking successful! Are you trying to kill off our Star Trek franchise and IP!? If this show Fucking fails, we may not get another one! SNW has already finished wrapping so this has to carry forward the franchise! And quit Fucking calling it CDW in space you Assholes!
How DO you keep an old sci-fi show culturally relevant?
>>217271118>If this show Fucking fails, we may not get another one!Temporal death is better than butchering of lore and worldbuilding.
>>217271118This is obviously a false-flag post, an attempt by an oldtrek geezer to sound like a nuTrek fan. It won't work. If you have to traffic in lies to support your position, then maybe your position isn't defensible.
>>217271189Trek's so-called "lore" and "worldbuilding" is highly inconsistent. The episodes regularly take liberties with it for short-term convenience. And you know this. Why try to treat Star Trek as some sort of infallible religious faith?
>>217271155You have to accept that something like Star Trek will never be as relevant as it was during the peak of TNG. These shows will never get 10 million viewers like TNG did. The best thing to do is lean into the niche of white male nerds who went out of their way to support the franchise. Find ways to market the old shows to younger fans if you can't match their quality with brand new productions. TNG and DS9 are timeless so it's not like younger fans wouldn't be able to connect with them.
>>217271286It seems like Picard is ashamed of TNG, nobody wants to acknowledge or pay any of the old writers who worked on these old shows, but they also want to make money from the memberberry shit.
>>217271247My main beef is destruction of Romulus and ruining the Borg.>>217271286Trek could easily have Spider-Man audience if it managed to lean into Nerd Power Fantasy that is also relatable while being loyal to the original ideals.people who made Spiderman are fucking smart
>>217271286>lean into the niche of white male nerds who went out of their way to support the franchiseThat's exactly what they SHOULDN'T do, and to their credit, they're not. That fanbase is not only diminished, and diminishing more every day, but it's toxic (a fact cast into sharp relief in this general). They should do what they're doing now, which is also what they did back in 1966—try to appeal to as many potential fans as possible.>TNG and DS9 are timelessThen why were they dumped onto an "over the air" channel with a median viewer age of 62?
