Kino editionPrevious Thread: >>56828379This is a thread aimed at self insertion fantasies of female humans with male pokemon. Established human characters are permitted but are not the focus. Keep it reasonably pokeyume and on topic. No yuri/yaoi.>Booruhttps://monyu.me>Bots:Typhlosion Abduction: https://janitorai.com/characters/04e5cf75-da09-4f93-aa4f-605fbc443274_character-hisuian-typhlosionShy Muk: https://janitorai.com/characters/9acb6bb2-5746-4757-81a8-e3a7ced9f9b4_character-mukSuicune Adventures: https://janitorai.com/characters/20d143a7-74ec-4561-8918-6d85b4894068_character-suicune>Other Threads:Gay Husbandos: >>>/vp/mpomhYuri Waifus: Make a thread!Pokemon Waifus: >>>/vp/hmofpHuman Husbandos: >>>/vp/husbandoHuman Waifus: No general, just search for the trainer nameThread questions: (Answer whichever you like)For yumes:>Are you into any terato outside of pokemon? If so, was pokemon your first interest or a later addition?>What trainer class would you be in the Pokemon world? (Breeder, Swimmer, Psychic, Hiker, Ace trainer, Blackbelt, Fisher, etc.)>What would you do if you one day woke up with your pokehusband in the real world?>Do you imagine your pokehusband to be similar to others in his species, or is he a special one?For everyone:>What's a question you would like to ask others with the same pokehusband/insertmon as you?>What is the most romantic song in the games?For monster inserters:>Do you imagine life as a pokemon beyond the romantic fantasy in any way?>Would you prefer to live with your wife in a more "human" or "feral" or "wild" setting?
Anchor post for original art.Reply to this post if you drew something yourself.
Activities:- Draw yourself and your husbandomon going to the movies!- Draw a romantic dinner at a restaurant- Draw yourself and your husbandomon create something (painting, singing, dancing etc)(The dudes may also do this with their favorite mon they insert into+a human girl)You may also write about these activities if you prefer. Another round of activities will be posted if much of the thread remains after a week.
>>56896846>>Are you into any terato outside of pokemon? If so, was pokemon your first interest or a later addition?Yes, but Pokemon is the most widespread by far. Other series are very hit or miss if I'd want to fuck/marry the monsters, but Pokemon it's a lot of them. Pokemon was probably the first time I wanted it, but I was really young when I realized it. I was, I forget if it was 7 or 8, I already knew broadly where babies come from, realized what was happening at the day care, then realized that meant it could be me in there. And then wanted to be in there. While he hasn't stayed my go to husband, Tyranitar will always have a place in my heart for being the first time I wanted to do vague, lewd things with a pokemon, even if I didn't know exactly, and mostly knew it just meant getting naked and kinda rubbing. >>What trainer class would you be in the Pokemon world? (Breeder, Swimmer, Psychic, Hiker, Ace trainer, Blackbelt, Fisher, etc.)If psychic powers are on the table, I'm getting them. Besides that, definitely a breeder. I want to have lots, learn cool stuff about them, and have lots of opportunities to sample them myself.>>What would you do if you one day woke up with your pokehusband in the real world?Do some safety and reality checks, then make sure he's doing alright, then, I dunno, start spoiling him rotten and teasing him until he takes me, if he's dense, after a while I'll probably just go for it.>>Do you imagine your pokehusband to be similar to others in his species, or is he a special one?I mean, I always kinda imagine they're a LITTLE smarter than probably average. More dolphin+ across the board, intelligent enough to speak and understand speech, even if they lack the anatomy to actually speak, than raw wild animal. I don't have the same expectation of random pokemon, and it's not even a requirement to, y'know, taste them. But it is required for having a relationship.Besides that, normal
>>56896846>>What's a question you would like to ask others with the same pokehusband/insertmon as you?Just off the Lopunny stuff from the last thread, what's your individual set of appeals for Lopunny?It's fascinating to see such a different perception of a pokemon that all results in liking it
>>56897503I mean, I said it last time, but I'll repeat it in case this goes anywhere, I like gushing over my crushes. I like the idea of a cute guy that can kinda blend in and do girly stuff with me. Kinda, publicly a galpal, but he's undeniably a guy otherwise. That's an important aspect of it, I think. It's not like some other "feminine" pokemon like Gardevoir, where I kinda can't imagine a male acting like a male. That can be sweet in its own way, but Lopunny, I get this impression of a sporty, if cute guy, and the idea of looking like two girls out and about, when he's fucking me often is exciting to me.
>>56896846>Are you into any terato outside of pokemon? If so, was pokemon your first interest or a later addition?not really, pokemon was formative for me so its stuck with me this whole time. >What trainer class would you be in the Pokemon world? (Breeder, Swimmer, Psychic, Hiker, Ace trainer, Blackbelt, Fisher, etc.)probably a ranger, I've always loved pokemon rangers. or a contest hall regular, I love contest halls. >What would you do if you one day woke up with your pokehusband in the real world?my husband has his own island in Emerald so that's where I would want to be with him. I'm big into that sort of thing, like to think we have a tropical paradise island where we are left alone. I love birth island its such a cool place in emerald>Do you imagine your pokehusband to be similar to others in his species, or is he a special one?There's only two Deoxys and I'd like to be with them both. Like to imagine theyre both very protective of eachother but they'd have very different personalities. One is more anxious and the other more confident. they both took to me because I kept them safe from rayquaza.
>>56898024Basically it would just be nice to have a guy around who you can do some girly stuff without him being all "eww gay" or somehow gaining a taste for femdomshit. Like, just be normal about it.>GardevoirI honestly prefer Gallade for having the gentle knight aura.
>>56896846thank you for posting the op
I don't like how much of new Typh art has just been male gaze stuff wtf
>>56899740he looks like he fucks human women and would let them apply his mascara after hes done
>>56899740is your image an example of this? i'm often unsure what people really mean by it.
>>56898836>Like, just be normal about itEXACTLYJust doing stuff together without having to worry about weird reactions. Being a little metro or alternative is fine, great even, just, be normal about it.>GalladeHe feels a little aloof to me, but not exactly bad. I know there's sometimes a really fine between being serious but sensitive, and just being aloof that I know really works for some people. I tend to like a bit more outgoing and open types.The amount of personality projection onto pokemon is so weird and cool, I think. One of the more fun things about this.
As much as I like the more porny stuff, I'm loving all of the more cozy stuff here. I've never really known how to search for it
>>56901781pixivs human/pokemon tag with the all ages setting is one of the best general feeds for yume stuff:https://www.pixiv.net/en/tags/%E3%83%9D%E3%82%B1%E3%83%A2%E3%83%B3%C3%97%E4%BA%BA%E9%96%93/artworks?mode=safegelbooru has some good hugging pics too:https://gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=pokemon_%28creature%29+1girl+hug+rating%3ageneral
>>56901872Oooh that's good, thank you so much!
>>56896846>What's a question you would like to ask others with the same pokehusband/insertmon as you?How do you like your serps? As much as the "canon" personality seems to be kinda haughty majestic, I rather enjoy a mischievous Serperior. And a flirtatious one, but even then, it's closer to playfulness with lewd or romantic topics than flirting for flirting's sake. >Do you imagine life as a pokemon beyond the romantic fantasy in any way?To be perfectly honest, I'm not big on romance. All my poke-fantasies are more in the day-to-day of a close relationship, stuff that would show up if we were simply close friends who share a bed. Like, less "fancy date night with wine" and more "hey let's head to our favorite diner for dinner, I promise not to laugh at you trying to eat hashbrowns without hands." I'm her partner pokemon.>Would you prefer to live with your wife in a more "human" or "feral" or "wild" setting?Human, for her comfort, though ideally someplace with a nearby forest or at least a park with decent greenery. Though, if rather than a wife, she was simply a budding interest I'm growing oddly attached to, I enjoy the scenario of being a feral snake just a bit past the treeline, to be ventured towards rather than merely crossed paths in human society.
>>56900180Actually no, what I meant is stuff like Typh "mommy". I guess male appeal would be a better word.That image is something I want more of.
>>56903497>pov shot>hazy focus>typhlosion loving gaze>offering berries to eat>one paw pushing a leg higher and towards stomach>your hand caressing his face
>>56900180>i'm often unsure what people really mean by it.Male gaze means a work focuses on the stereotypically "sexy" part of the female form, usually implying to the detriment of presenting the character as a person. It can apply outside of media as well. The most basic form would be the idea that a guy is looking at a girl's chest, not her face, and if translated into a work, the image or shot focusing on her boobs, maybe even clipping off the head entirely. In a show or movie, an example would be like a shot of a girl starting at her hips, then slowly trailing up the rest of her body. In posing, this might translate into the girls taking somewhat strange movements, to maximize exposure. It's a thing that can be a bit hard to define, but once you start to notice it, it's everywhere. This can also take somewhat unique forms if a particular artist or creator has a specific fetish, like feet or pits.In the context of porn or porn adjacent material, it's kinda hard to single out since, showing and focusing on the sexy bits is kinda the pointLike, a great little microcosm and example.This >>56903606Has the clear focus on the girl's ass. It's front and center, there's the skindentation and strange pose she's in to facilitate the view, and it can be easy to entirely miss the face in the back on a first glance. I would say this is an image that has fairly strong male gaze.Counter >>56901559The place the eye is drawn, that's near front and center is Kris's face and expression. Her posture is one that's primarily communicating her contentment and relaxation, there's very little focus whatsoever on her boobs, hips, or butt. There is a bit on her legs, but whether that's just a factor of her outfit, or a bit more is uncertain, and the bare feet are a bit undetailed, implying they are more to show comfort than being shown off, though that could just be the artist not being that good at them. I would say this image has fairly minimal male gaze, if it has any at all.
>>56903797So basically just fanservice? I don’t get how that’s supposed to be bad
>>56903820Basically.It's more a matter of taste, but the arguments for it being bad mostly center around the dehumanizing qualities of it, specifically the de-emphasis of the face. That it being pervasive reinforces ideas of women not being "real" people, and being boobs with a human body attached, or what have you. Whether you agree with those or not are up to you, I guess. For me, I'm bi so I'm fine either way, but if you're not, it could be the equivalent of a guy getting uncomfortable about how much man ass they have to look at in this shot of porn
>>56903894>de-emphasis of the faceDoes that really happen though? I legit never see that. Even if you have ass or tits or whatever, if the girl’s face isn’t attractive, nobody is gonna like that or waifu the girlSometimes it’s kinda hidden for specific shots because out of frame/implied stuff can be hot, but that always relies on you already knowing what the girl’s face looks like, and usually done in a way where is absence is actually an indirect emphasis on itAlso, you said that yourself in your previous post, but porn is porn, ofc if you look at porn you’re gonna see huge emphasis on sexual attributes because that’s what people look at porn for. So yeah you get oversized breasts, asses, dicks. Obviously if you look at porn of female characters they’re going to be thought for a male audience, while porn of male characters are gonna be for a female audience, resulting usually in the man/the woman (respectively) being a generic self insert. That’s why faceless men are so common in men-oriented porn doujins, because the authors know the readers aren’t here for the men
>>56903797yeah, i'm generally familiar with the formal use, it's the colloquial one that i sometimes don't keep up with. like the other anon said, maybe it's often used to just mean male-oriented in general. it's interesting, because i kind of grew up thinking the kris picture is a very bad "offender" due to the kawaii factor, and I would've been very ashamed for liking it when I was younger.>>56903940nta but i think there is probably some cultural and medium differences in how it plays out in practice. in anime, faces are heavily emphasized and often made to look consistently kind and inviting (or the opposite) for the viewer which can be dehumanizing in its own way. i think it's also just a general autistic preference since we tend to overly interpret more ambiguous expressions as hostile, and a lot of bishies do the same thing of course.>>56903820i don't think it's bad. it might be if there is a heavy bias towards it, but it's not really a political thread so i'd just take it as a preference thing.
>>56903940>That’s why faceless men are so common in men-oriented porn doujins, because the authors know the readers aren’t here for the menThis one is just my thoughts, but I'm actually pretty sure this is a funny case of that dehumanizing effect. The guys aren't just faceless because male readers aren't interested, they're faceless to make them less real, and thus less sexually intimidating to the reader/seen less as competition.Otherwise, yeah, it doesn't really apply to porn, since that's the point anyways. It's more when its deployed in non porn contexts that it gets named as such, even the example I highlighted is more porn coded than not, explocot or otherwise, so it's not exactly the perfect case, it was just something in the thread I could sorta use. Ultimately, whether or not you agree with the wider arguments of it, or find some point in between that works for you, it's a somewhat consistent set of principles you can use when analyzing works. It is an interesting note that the same principle, applied to male bodies doesn't have the same degree of scrutiny, as far as I know. Maybe innovations have been made, I'm a couple years out of learning this stuff and haven't stayed up to date or anything.
>>56904047>due to the kawaii factor,Honestly, now that you mention it, good point.I don't exactly have the best passive sense for this, since I like girls, too, and so some of it probably flies under the radar the same way it does for guys. Maybe.Much like there's not much on focus on male bodies, I don't think there's much on female visual consumption of female bodies either.
Cinderace (male) owes me (male) a rimjob
>>56903797Your >>56903606 example is from a female artist who self-inserts though...
>>56903894>>56903797eh. for me male gaze doesnt really have to do anything with dehumanization. it just means pictures that *only* cater to men. for example in nsfw its a focus on sex that.. feels repulsive in a way (and not because there happens to be an ass or titties cause i draw those myself). men when it comes to porn like drawing things that are just way more "gross" and it focuses less on how a character is feeling/emoting or interacting with others. its more about rendered close up shots of yellow cum splattering everywhere and a focus on her (always naked) body with nothing else while the male is just.. kinda there and god forbid you show his face or how good HES feeling when hes fucking. that last point is something im desperately missing sometimes.basically>only male pov>no face or like no focus on the males emotions or how they work>no good character interactions at all>intense focus on more gross or disgusting looking things like aside from being a meme i can tell this >>56903606 was drawn by a woman because the creatures (whos faces are also focus of the scene which tells us how they feel) are actually interacting with her and creating a scene that would make a woman blush if it was her. which is why this was appealing to her and she drew it. whats of note is that the ass is not *just* meant for a male viewer here (like is normally the case with regular fan service) but its meant for the male monsters in the art. it shows us that they get turned on by it (which is one of the reasons i like putting ass into my own yume art cause aside from wanting to draw it i just genuinely like knowing whats causing him to feel a certain way and him enjoying it..? thats hot.)
>>56904636Hey, I dunno the details of authorship, I was just trying to explain using on-hand materials. I never said I was all that good at it, and getting corrected is nice, and probably wouldn't have happened if I hadn't laid out what I know, y'know?
>>56904838Gross
>>56904636well, that's the thing i think. you can only go so far in applying structural analysis to individual works. the academic term (that the anon was using) wasn't really intended to distinguish male and female tastes, but about how female sexualization tends to work as an ever-present fixed "gaze" that makes it very hard to depict her full humanity. like that anon said, in a trivial sense that image is a depiction that visually does just that, but that doesn't really mean the image is bad or that it can't cater to "female tastes", especially when the purpose is to give the viewer a sense of being desired by hot frog men.>>56904663i think this is a good example of what i mean, when we talk about "male gaze" we're really talking of different things. one of them is about what men and women tend to like in erotic or romantic depictions, the other about the consequences of how women are often depicted in longer medium like film. what's unfortunate, i think, is how the moral implications of one melts together with the other and causes a lot of shame for women whenever their taste doesn't follow what's expected of them to like or not.>>56904217i think it has more to do with cultural context and personal sensitivities, especially with things that are less overtly sexual. kawaii isn't very present in western media like it is in japanese, so western analysis usually skips or simplifies it. for me, i had no real female friends growing up and was picked on a lot for my interests, so i became hyper aware of anything i did that was out of line. analysis helped me a lot to decouple my personal shame about these things from how and when and why they are actually bad.just like with the frog picture, the kris picture is a typical kawaii depiction that is in line with permissible female expression in a japanese context, but it's also just a picture of a girl who looks happy and safe and probably appeals to anyone who isn't used to feeling happy or safe.
>>56905092>personal sensitivitiesThat might be a big thing?I guess, in hindsight it makes sense.I see the frog one more in the light of thinking the girl is hot, and the Kris one more as inserting as her, and wanting to feel as good and relaxed as she looks. That maybe informed my perception along the lines of gaze? It's funny how this stuff works.
>>56896846do these threads get archived?
>>56904223MmmmMaybe it's just me, and I don't totally know why, but with only a handful of exceptions, I don't really enjoy the idea of oral from human size or bigger pokemon, only with smaller, cuter ones. Most of the exceptions are either snakes, or have a really weird mouth I'm curious about more than anything else.
>>56906109yes: https://arch.b4k.co/vp/search/text/pokeyume/type/op/you can also install the 4chan-x extension to read to read archives through the usual 4chan interface
>>56905838I love her Cinderace art so much, especially the porn
>>56906109Is you retarded ?
>>56904838I'm not sure how one kisses with a beak, exactly. But I'd give him a peck on the cheek.
>>56906218yes :(
>>56906177thank you so much
>>56906286Cute
>>56906207sauce?
>>56907128https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/84510386
>>56898024>lopunny, I get this impression of a sporty, if cute guy, this is the first time I've ever anyone describe Lopunny even remotely masculine but now that you mention it I actually sort of see it >>56899740The likely issue is many artists making Typh stuff now normally only "male gaze" stuff and are only doing the Typh stuff now because its trendy; some are just trying to catch up with the algorithms (sometimes you just have to play the game), while others are trolls only making it to add fuel to the Typhlosion rapist memes because they think Typhosion fans no longer able to like a pokemon without being seen as perverts and rapists is the funniest thing ever because they're spiteful cunts who have the humor of a retarded middle-schooler. >>56905092>one of them is about what men and women tend to like in erotic or romantic depictions, the other about the consequences of how women are often depicted in longer medium like film. ngl the majority of the time I've seen male gaze discussed its mostly bad faith arguments and bitter people seething that men dare have preferences, but your summary makes perfect of sense.
>>56906219well, birds regurgitate food for their partners as a kiss, so...
>>56907405page https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/85822590
>>56907461>ngl the majority of the time I've seen male gaze discussed its mostly bad faith arguments and bitter people seething that men dare have preferenceswas gonna add that i dont mind men having their own pictures or that i enjoy that art if it hits my likes cause yeahh dont wanna give off that vibe. everyone can have their likes and some get more art than others but that just means you gotta draw your own stuff if you want more of what you like yourself. at the end of the day its just pictures and sometimes male and female tastes cross anyway.
>>56907405>>56908299Wow her work is really good!
>>56908663YeahI'm aware of it as a concept and think it's interesting, but I don't really have any opinions on it as a sort of moral policing or whatever. I'm way more interested in alternative manifestations of similar things in people besides heterosexual men. What's gay male gaze? What's straight woman gaze? What does gaze look like on a frog man? And so on.
>>56908856the internet needs more pokemon x bride pictures
>>56908856That's adorable! Cinderace is really exemplary good as a human replacement. I love how it always looks so awestruck by its trainer. Adorable little face.>>56909009That too. The idea of marrying your partner despite the species is so romantic. Just officially showing your love to the world.
>>56909009I think this qualifies, but it's hard to tell without color.>>56903597Actually, anyone got the source on this? I couldn't find it, but for some reason I feel like this is a reference to a specific old /vp/ thread I remember somehow.https://archive.palanq.win/vp/thread/26523997/#26536317Shame it's from the period where all the images are fucking lost.Although on the general topic of "the internet needs more X pictures" and "that's cool but I want more pictures like this", you can always be the change you want to see. Unfortunately that involves effort and I think we all know how much we hate that. I'm no artist but I've got a ton of barely started stuff lying around, mostly amounts to notes and partial vague outlines. The thread activities are pretty decent for getting people to do something, but it could also be worth considering something to motivate more personal projects. Given how long these threads last a weekly thing probably isn't the best idea, but perhaps some sort of monthly expo of sorts could work. I'm reminded of /agdg/'s demo days. Unfortunately, as established, I'm all vague ideas no follow through so I'm probably not the person to ask for any more details.
i love my punk husband
Is it wrong to be attracted to Koraidon? Started Scarlet and when he escorted me through the little cave I got to thinking about him being my mate and defending me.
>>56910693NahHe's pretty sexy and gives off some pretty good protector vibes. Plus the strong arms and long tongue.Makes perfect sense to me
>>56909442we could always make it a thread activity cause that material is imo more rare than pokemon in wedding dresses. this pic is also not a bride pic
>>56910693Both of them are surprisingly appealing for lizard motorcycles and I'm not sure why that is. Maybe it's the character rich eyes.
>Mixed wrestling based or cringe?
>>56910595I was wondering why I didn't see more of him in these threads. I thought Toxi would be very popular with yumes.
>>56903797When people talk about Male Gaze they're generally just talking about sexually stylized art that appeals to more men than it does women. When I say sexually stylized, I don't mean the general art style, I mean specific composition techniques utilized to exaggerate the bodies and sexuality of the characters. That means posing primarily focused on facing the chest, ass, or crotch of one or more characters at the POV, framing the shot to focus on these parts as well, using coloring tricks to exaggerate the shininess of breasts/rosiness of cheeks, imagery like melting/shocked outlines on skin, exaggerated facial expressions, etc. Exaggerated proportions are also usually involved. People call it Male Gaze because most men, from straight men, to gay men, to trans chasers, and both furries/non-furries like this kind of style/framing in their fanart porn.These things aren't 100% though, and shouldn't be used to assume things about people. There are plenty of women who draw and consume art like that too, and plenty of men (the vast majority of men who don't like large breasts actually) aren't really that into it. And I think that dichotomy exists far more in the west/furry communities than it does with Japanese art. I don't think pursuing the "Male Gaze" is what makes a lot of that art mediocre though, moreso that it just refuses to attempt to do anything else. Most of that stuff would be much better if a little bit more effort was put into nuanced expression and posing. IMO the very explicit and feral nature of the male gaze stuff is good, but those themes are better drawn in other styles.I'd argue the official art style has always had a bit of that in it with the curvy chests and hips on young characters.
>>56896846>Do you imagine life as a pokemon beyond the romantic fantasy in any way?Not really. I'm not a furry. It's hard to explain why I self insert into a Pokémon, other than the fact that an older girl I knew growing up was REALLY into it, so I got it into my head that that seemed like a "male ideal": a strong and loyal protector. I think I've been influenced by a lot of the art too, especially of being able to be ridden or of girls cuddling with their mon. In an edgy way, a Pokémon is more powerful than a human and commands respect a regular human doesn't. I don't want to be a "Pokémon" just for myself, as much as I want to be a Pokémon in the eyes of my wife.>Would you prefer to live with your wife in a more "human" or "feral" or "wild" setting?Either one works. I think a semi-wild setting is my ideal, where a human world and cities exist, but we spent most of our time away on adventures in the expanse.
>no cod xbox lobby where the pokemon males in the voice chat try to flirt with your human girl ass>no banter and stupid laughing together with pkmn dudes>no friend request from your ideal pokemon guy that turns into more than just friendship what the fuck.... going to bed. dont forget to wake me up when monster men are real. especially typhlosion.
Would you raise your own husbandomon?
>>56915733Honestly that image kinda shows why that would be weird. It's like your own child at that point.I think last time the question came up most preferred to catch one or meet him later or be caught by one .The one I could maybe accept would be growing up together with your partner, basically a sandlot romance.
>>56916048>The one I could maybe accept would be growing up together with your partnerThis is my favorite
>>56896846There are no other bots? or are those just the ones made for these threads?
>>56915733Yes
>>56917027there are prolly tons of bots on janitorai if you search for them, these are just the ones made in this thread.
>>56914338Based, but god I wish that was me
>>56915099>just refuses to attempt to do anything else.I can't always tell 'cuz I'm a huge pervert, but I do feel... bored, when I'm just looking at another basically pinup or orthodox sex scene. Part of it's definitely just because I think I have a variety and novelty fetish, but, yeah, there's a lot or refusal to do new stuff that I guess I notice. Like, hugely off topic, but maybe another good case might be in futa. There's this fixation on hyper size genitals and massive volume and pressure ejaculations that I don't actually think is very representative of what people actually want, but futas with 20 inch cocks are still the standard, with it being relatively rare to see a futa with an average or small one. There's also a pretty harsh lack of futasub or more casual futa art. Maybe that's to be expected a bit, making a change from the ordinary, then doing absolutely nothing with that change is maybe not normal, but it still does sometimes make me think it's a sometimes boring state of affairs. Like, I can't think of more than a handful of images of futas getting pegged, which just feels like a missed opportunity and stagnant, y'know? Maybe that's not what you mean though.
>>56917212>futas getting peggedI suspect that's rare because the existence of futas means that there are woman who can top without the use of a toy - though honestly that also ignores the possibility of fantastical dildos (which is disappointingly also rare in normal pegging art).That said, there's also not much male/futa where the guy's the one topping....or, getting slightly back on topic, you also don't see much monyume or terato in general where the monster gets pegged, except as a humorous "haha, the scary dragon got emasculated" bit.
>>56896910>>56897026Dancing! >Are you into any terato outside of pokemon? If so, was pokemon your first interest or a later addition?I've had many furry and monster husbandos but none that really stuck with me as long as Hitmontop. >What trainer class would you be in the Pokemon world? (Breeder, Swimmer, Psychic, Hiker, Ace trainer, Blackbelt, Fisher, etc.)A breeder would be fun but I think I fit the class of swimmer, since it's my passion.>What would you do if you one day woke up with your pokehusband in the real world?First off, make him feel welcome here. Give him his own space in the home, get to know him and his likes and dislikes. >Do you imagine your pokehusband to be similar to others in his species, or is he a special one?I imagine that all Pokemon are unique like people, so he would have his own personality and preferences. Through developing love and spending so much time together, yes, he'd be very special.For everyone:>What's a question you would like to ask others with the same pokehusband/insertmon as you?I know there's at least one other anon who likes Hitmontop like I do, but I haven't seen them post in a while. So my question would be what their favorite thing about him is.>What is the most romantic song in the games?I think the National Park theme is pretty romantic.
>>56917027Just for this thread and made by us anons
>>56917415The little bowtie is so cute
I was fucking with the suicune bot and got some really good shit. For a Claydol no less, what the fuck?
>>56896910heres my goofball silly stuff for the art prompt. I think I want to go with shiny deoxys for my main bf, but his twin is a regular colored one who I also take care of. heres him discovering him and a nod to birth island
>>56917415ohhh they look so fancy and elegant hitmontop anon! this makes me wanna color my next activity picture.>>56917622i love how we get to see her art and the bigger environment surrounding them.(hearts for everyones art)
>>56915010i havent seen many fics in ao3 but this one pixiv artist is super good so i live
>>56917212>Maybe that's not what you mean.Nah, that's exactly it. I just get convoluted with my thought sometimes. Basically, moreso than there is some male or female gaze, artists know what works for various genres and demographics and they're afraid to deviate from it because their success is on the line. The futa thing is a good example because that genre regularly crosses into borderline self-parody without the artists even trying to.But that's why we're here right? To develop/collect/cultivate a new/burgeoning direction in pokemon fanworks. To make or find the things we want but don't have.
Oh man, how I wish human women were real…
>>56918877>all those badgeszamn...
>>56908663oh don't worry, I didn't get that vibe or anything condemnatory from your comment. I've lurked for a couple of these threads and it's been fun and quite illuminating seeing what goes on in the "other half's" minds so to speak. For example it never occurred to me that Game Freak being dumb enough let one of their resident retards use some Pokemon (especially Typhlosion, a fucking starter) for anything even remotely close to a rape-fic, would result in some people genuinely liking Typhlosion more, but I can't really complain if more people appreciate Typh even if not in the same way I do.>What's a question you would like to ask others with the same pokehusband/insertmon as you?Whenever I self insert as Pokemon, i tend to go for ghost types, particularly the cofagrigus/Runerigus One thing Id like do know is if you just see them as a husband with intangibilit, floating, etc, or does the undead nature of ghosts has any impact in your fantasies.>What is the most romantic song in the games?A toss up between the RSE/DPP surf themes.>>56908864that's a good question.>>56917622nice
ive been sitting on some thread scribble. really need to post that tomorrow but its also extremely fun combing the web for pictures. lyra and typh are my favs in art i think. literally me vibes.
>>56917415your art is amazing I really like the detail on the clothes
>>56917415He keeps growing!
Man how I hate dismissing this thread for an yet another tranny circlejerk from the get-go for so long… But then again me wanting a degenerate GF for the sole purpose of cucking me with literal animals somehow makes me even worse than actual troonpedo groomers for reasons I'll never bother trying to understand.
>>56921433These threads always screamed female autism to me, or at the very least loneliness. If it was just sex shit I would have immediatly dismissed it as a tranny circlejerk, but the blatant romantism and the long form discussions show it is actual woman. I feel it's the high exposure to these cutesy romance and shoujo bait manga that ends up leaving already pretty weird and lonely woman, since yk you already have to be somewhat of a outsider to know what shoujo even means, falling over themselves for this type of unrealistic relationship. In my eyes it's healthier than booktok smut for normies, but I just got out of a relationship where my girlfriend would make suicide threats if I spent 3 days without talking to her and was incapable of achieving a orgasm unless I gave her my jacket because it was cold outside, gave her a nice meal, brought her on a night time bike ride to our spot by the cliffside, talked about life and our sad experiences with it and made out to her playlist. Sure these little moments are special and nice, I myself write a lot of poetry, but they feel severely lacking and tiresome when they are requested of you ALL THE TIME. Never dating another yume, three times was enough
>>56922146>if I spent 3 days without talking to heryeah well why tf would you? Why are a lot of guys like that?
>>56922194Yeah...Like, a busy day happens sometimes, I get it, but if you love someone, how can you go more than a day or two and not want to at least call and say hi? Doesn't have to be much, even just a good morning call or text is so good.
>56921433Fuck off and die Magnetfaggot
>>56922146You're here on 4chan, you're autistic and lonely too.
>>56922146>suicide threatsi don't really think it's shouja manga or even loneliness causing bpd or similar dysregulation issues, more-so that you're probably looking for partners in much too niche spaces where people with emotional issues are the ones available.
>>56922194I usually like typing long paragraphs woth excessive detail on everything I think/feel. I did type her unusually small messages to try and fill up the void but we did not talk or meet IRL. I was really busy studying and doing work related stuff I could not catch a break for even 15 minutes and whenever I did I would fall asleep.>>56922279Yeah, im not any better
>>56922431idk, at the same time, I'd be pretty upset if someone didn't call me either with no warning or anything.
>>56922431yeah this. threats like that arent normal at all (and so is not talking to your partner for 3 days but texting definitely counts as talking if you did that). very sorry to hear that happened cause i dont think i have to even explain how thats really fucked up and not okay. am not really a fan of hearing insert group is horrible to date based on dating one person. many people just suck a lot and just because one girl had horrible bpd behavior doesnt mean all of them do. when it comes to unrealistic expectations then that also depends on the person. its not like we know every poster itt and their feelings towards what a relationship should look like so at that point its just an assumption about an entire group of random people. maybe someone has a chronic illness. maybe someone has trauma. maybe someone isnt neurotypical. maybe someone isnt good at communication. not saying unrealistic expectations (hey maybe i have some. not sure.) and bad people dont exist but there can be more involved than that if you ask an entire group of strangers because theyre all individuals with their own reasons for where they are and why.
>>56920500to clarify Game freak isn't retarded for someone having a fetish, they're retarded for letting someone write something so out of place with the rest of the franchise, not realizing that like monster-human breeding and questionable consent is playing with fire, not having the foresight to delete something obviously not canon, and not anticipating the absolute clusterfuck the would happen (and did) if that story got hacked seeing that they're too stupid to know what internet security is. Or they did know, they just didn't care since none of the stories involved any shillmons.>>56923962>am not really a fan of hearing insert group is horrible to date based on dating one person. many people just suck a lot>when it comes to unrealistic expectations then that also depends on the person.When the flying fuck did 4chan of all places become the most reasonable social media website?
What is this threads opinion on Machamp? I know he's literally just a buff dude with 4 arms and I myself normally go for more feral looking mon but recently I have been using him in the PTCG app and he's growing on me.
>>56924576Ugly
>>56924576EhThe four arms don't really do anything for me, and he's a bit of a butterface. Honestly Machoke is better on basically every level, but even then, I'd rather something more interesting like Salamence or Flygon, or even something like Tropius or Tyranitar if I just wanted the "big, strong guy" vibe. And the king of that vibe, to me, is Aggron, but he's a little of his own thing, too. Like, it's not like I'm averse to him, but he's pretty much at the bottom of what I'd consider fuckable, to the point it's almost more of a "why bother". Sure, if he was sweet or had some other great personality factors, but that applies to everyone else on the "would" list
>>56924576really love his body and arms but yeah the beak lips are not the most sexy feature
>>56922146 >he had sex with a human of the opposite gender
>>56922146Good, leave them for me. She doesn’t need fixing but I can handle her
>>56920500 >one of their resident retards You do realize that this supposed retard is now the lead worldcrafting writer for the past 2 game gens and also co-writes the background lore for the Liko anime series?
>>56922255I may consider it if you'd tell me just how the Fug you're able to guess so well that it was me writing that?>>56926006Good to know I guess? It certainly explains a few funny things happening in there . .
>>56906219>his is the official artwork of a real card Somebody really knows what they're doing.
>>56926006>TPC/Game Freak rewards retardationExplains everything about this franchise
>>56922146holy blogposterinno
>>56926006I still don't understand how anyone can read the actual leaked Typhlosion lore and be offended. I have trouble understanding what background someone could have that they'd have any reaction other than:a) Thinking it's good world-building because it resembles actual myths and religious stories.b) Don't care one way or the other, it's just fiction.c) Like it because you are into this sort of thing.I struggle to imagine a Pokemon fan whose reaction shouldn't be one of those 3 things, I really don't understand how this bothers so many people, unless they're just completely uninformed and are only going off of what engagement scammers on social media ACTED LIKE was in the lore that wasn't actually in there.
>>56926397some people are so retarded and cant see it as anything but 'ruined' now because 'degenerates' like their thing. Like its so obviously not canon but retards are so brainwashed into giving a shit about 'canon' (which is a marketing term) that its now ruined because if you like it that MUST mean youre an irl zoophile. people are weirdos about fiction, especially on twitter. Same as men who watch the most degenerate porn being mad at women for reading romance novels.
imagine if your husbando came home one day and just had several permanent new piercings. maybe even a few tattoos.
>>56927122>piercings and tattoosGross
>>56927122>the Gholdengo equivalent of tattoos being those hallmarks that get stamped on jewelry
>>56917488>>56917472>>56917472Thank you so much!>>56921107Yeah, I was making him way too small in my earlier drawings, sorry for the inconsistency.
>>56927944woah i never realized how big he is. now i wonder how tall they made him in pbr.
>>56926397i can empathize with people where it's a genuine compartmentalization thing. hadn't i known japanese media well enough where something like the typhlosion story existing wasn't even remotely surprising, i might've had some struggles with it too. it was similar when the madoka movie released many years ago.>>56924392i don't think it's a 4chan thing as much as it's a hobbyist circle or general thread thing, i think people are generally more reasonable when they have something to work or focus on.
>Male gaze discussionI think there's a strong concept here worth talking about, but I don't think it'd be accurate to call it a "male gaze". As one of the men in this thread, I hate most of what you're describing too. Uncreative pinups, characters kissing or having sex like they don't know or care about eachother, trying to tell a viewer something is sexy through cliche poses and camera angles rather than actually being sexy, I think these are more problems with lazy slop content rather than a genuine thing that men want. Maybe I'm the odd one out, but all that kind of stuff sucks and I don't see how anyone who isn't in the peak of puberty could see it as anything other than jingling keys to win undeserved attention. Good romance and good porn is character driven rather than being purely based on visuals and actions. Pic related was the worst thread relevant sfw example I could find quickly. There's nothing behind the eyes of anyone here. I don't think there's anything male about the "male gaze", it's just artists treating sex appeal as a shallow engagement. It's the same thing as a director that thinks action is just about big explosions, or trying to get an audience to cry using nothing but sad violin, just directed towards the female body.
>Are you into any terato outside of pokemon? If so, was pokemon your first interest or a later addition?yeah. it was one of many things i grew up with and liked in that way.if it was a talking creature i thought was pretty then it was getting doodled. my first thoughts with that topic go back to drawing digimon and hamtaro creatures.>What trainer class would you be in the Pokemon world?lady. umbrella lady and rocket grunt are also nice but id say lady.>What would you do if you one day woke up with your pokehusband in the real world?ive thought about that when i looked outside and the gray rain fell on the cold grass. what id like to do is just be together and exist. the best moments would be just being outside together. next to each other. during day enjoying the warm sun and every flying leaf there is. during night having the yellow streetlamps illuminate our car as he drives me into nowhere. inhaling the fresh air and taking in the worlds atmosphere but not alone. it is shared in that really emotionally sensitive and autistic way of understanding the world.yeah just making our way down an abandoned street during the night and making a stop at a gas station while i smell the night breeze and gasoline in the air with him at my side... just sharing our bond. god it would be so kino. just buying a fucking sandwich at 2am at a gas station. just simple stuff like that but it would feel so real. hugging his arm while we share our single sandwich cause we forgot the cash at home. yeah. thats what id like to do.>Do you imagine your pokehusband to be similar to others in his species, or is he a special one?i think pokemon all have unique personalities like humans but can share some overall likes/dislikes that are species or type specific. fire pokemon feeling good in heated places would be an example.
>>56927944The perfect size for a smooch
.
i wish artists would upload their drawings to actual gallery sites instead of only handing out these compressed tumblr and twitter jpg images. just noticed all the artifacts and blurriness on one where i separated a duo out of a compilation of drawings.
Bump
where are the coinfuckers <\3
>>56937681Still around.
>>56937686i audibly squeaked thank you <3 i need to hurry up and share some art here soon
>>56936247Unfortunately Twitter is the only place where artists get to have both proper fan interaction and actual publicity, despite it being a terrible site with no good archiving attached to it.People feel obligated to post primarily there because it's where the general public is present and waiting to see your art, even if they're likely going to be surface level enjoyers of it at best who only see you as a new content funnel to gobble from until they get bored of you or think you did something irredeemably wrong 10 years past
>>56937704Thanks, but I'm not the artist. It's just a pic I collected from coinfucker threads past.
>>56936247I wish artists would host their own sites with archives and links to the sites of other artists they like.
>>56926397>leaked Typhlosion lore autist alert here but is it "lore" if nothing about made it to official media? >and be offendedfair question, you deserve a fair answer a) I don't think its especially good world building, one guy just copy-pasted Pokémon into sex myths with no rhyme or reasonc) I'm not into it (no judgement for anyone who is though) b)the fact that this fiction, is irrelevant. Practically the entire world is treating its like its real, with all the the memes calling comparing Typhloson to real monsters like Epstein, and even Typh fans being called pedo-apologists or even outright pedos and being sent death threats. Proving once again Pokemon has the worst fanbaseAlso, as someone who liked the lighter tone of Pokemon, despite Game Freak's shit writing, garbage world building, and retarded villains, I appreciated how things like disclination, profiling, rape, cancel-culture, etc, didn't exist since unlike the hellhole we're stuck with most people in the Pokeverse aren't assholes.Not only did Game Freak decide those things NEEDED to be introduced, but Typhosion should be the epicenter of it. (I know Slaking/Piloswine have the same story but those SOB's didn't get canceled by Elon Muskrat's minions so I'm focusing on Typh. also it seems the story is less outright rape and more VERY questionable consent and you can't really hold a skinwalker/yokai to the same standards as a human, but everyone's treating Typh like a pedo so the actual story is irrelevant). Put it another way, the one time GF gives Typhlosion anything, its a role as the most universally despised criminal who later get dismembered, presumably because its the only Pokemon expendable enough to GF that its reputation isn't important and its fans don't matter. how is that not an insult? tldr: Some bastard decided Typhlosion deserved a turbocharged hellish version of the Vaporeon pasta, and that bastard is treated like a king by Game Freak. Why shouldn't I be offended?
>>56938290>being sent death threatseh. thats just a day ending in y on twitter. crazy people will constantly look for reasons to act deranged like that. i feel like people with a twitter are kinda asking to get witch hunted or abused no matter what fandom they are from or who they are cause thats just the way users treat each other on there. its best just to ignore those crazies no matter on what platform.>Not only did Game Freak decide those things NEEDED to be introducedi mean theres a lot of dark stuff in old pokemon and more was planned. anyone remember shudo the anime head writer and how he constantly wanted things to be darker/more realistic? anyone remember his pocket monsters: the animation novels? i think the direction only took a drastic shift into kid friendly cause it got popular.>presumably because its the only Pokemon expendable enough to GF that its reputation isn't important and its fans don't matter.tbf thats an assumption and i think its unlikely. my assumption is they thought typhlosion is probably handsome to women and fits the yokai shoujo story so why not just paste him in there real quick. i just dont think the japanese man thought all that deeply about it or carried any hate in his heart when he did that. im gonna go as far and say they probably saw nothing wrong with it cause they just dont overthink these things like westerners.the thing fans could be upset about is that gf might treat him like jynx now. >Why shouldn't I be offended?i mean pokemon arent real. if my favorite had a story attached that im not into myself and would make strangers call me names online then whatever. my fav is already a regret topic for gf so id just be glad about all the extra art. maybe its cause i make things sometimes but you can always just claim things for yourself anyway. fictional characters are kinda just dolls to play with. you could always make a story about him and make your own typhlosion that people associate with your version of him.
>>56906219Here's how
>>56937704>>56937681>>56937686Kill yourself
>the next Penny animation with Sylveon will feature deep rimmingWelp, my anticipation levels have been completely drained now.
>>56937681>>56937686>>56937704>>56938164Why do you reply to yourself so much? Happens in every thread.
>>56939158Kek makes sense that the hideous cheesemonfag also samefags for attention.
>>56926397If it was actually romantic it would make sense but it's literally about kidnapping and rape. Not to mention abusive behavior like threatening to kill the girl's father. I like Typhlosion but damn the people who only started liking him for these leaks need to get out more.
>>56939221Go back to tumblr
>>56939229Nice comeback, thanks for not having any rebuttal to what I said at all.
>>56939371I'm not him, but how you wrote what you wrote reeks of someone who thinks every game needs a blaxk trans handicapable protagonist who strikes down the patriarchy
>>56939229Its tumblrfags who get off to the typh story so perhaps you are the one who should go back.
>>56939396Some of those that write rape ficsAre the same that report problematic content
>>56939376That's a lot of conjecture, seems like you have that kind of stuff just hanging around rent free in your head.
These threads are dead unless someone triggers people and it derails into pointless arguing.
>>56939412I'll be sure to take that into consideration when you release your doctoral thesis on how problematic and abusive Saturn Devouring His Son is and how we need to fix Greco-Roman mythology.
>>56939430They aren't comparable.
>>56939430except here you are advocating rape in a children's gamejust admit you're a pedo and you're only here for the loli threads
>>56939432Not really addressing the point, are you?
>>56939452You failed to make a point.
>>56939449Where did I advocate for rape being included in the game?
So...pokemon?
>>56939157What animation?
easy on the derailment sips anons
>>56939495
>>56939376>>56939396>>56939229You know what, after witnessing some of the most deranged content imaginable come out of Tumblr & Xitter (usually made by folks who consider themselves SJWs at that) over the years, I am starting to believe that a majority of those terminally-online leftards just use virtue-signaling as a smokescreen to conceal/balance-out their "problematic" levels of degeneracy. I mean how many times you've seen screencaps of those cringey "male feminist" & They/Them types with anime avatars saying that "Liking anime /hentai means you're a pedo!" only to be partyv& IRL for molesting real kids and/or owning gigabytes of CP? Now imagine how many creeps like that don't even get reported to the authorities due to having a vagina therefore not being considered to be dangerous… Methinks that the only reason for why Glip got finally exposed and arrested is because even fellow degenerettes were starting to become bothered by her derangement.
ive witnessed enough people who think basic ass anime tropes like cnc are le problematic and le politics. this is the 4ch pokefucking thread though so not relevant to us what those people think. >mean girls postingyeah less.>>56939157shame. i do think we are thinking of the same artist.>>56939417well a slow thread is still a thread. i do like the quality of our threads. i did wonder if maybe(?) some people are scared to write lewd or even reply if male. maybe even not writing their specific kind of lewd that theyre into cause of other posters. cant say i havent been holding back my human women are build for pokemon c0ck posting a bit cuz of that ayy lmao.>>56939566amazing. orange delight.
>>56939495>>56939566Those are some good chu's
>>56939800>Glipwho?
>>56938164i don't give a damn it's the thought that counts :D
>>56939116kill me yourself faggot
>>56940655>nta but calling others a faggot when you post like a 12 year old tumblrinaYou don't belong here.
>>56940655Stop shitting up the thread faggot. Nobody cares if somebody called you out on your retardation. >>56940307The quality has gone down for the past several threads. The booru was the last good thing to come out of these.
>denying the eroticism of the coin entity>denying there's more people into it than one would expect
>>56940718>>56940647Confirmed samefag
>>56940730>>56940718Xhe's not even trying to hide it anymore>>56940687I disagree the original content by the anons here is niceToo bad most people have moved on since the leaks
>>56896846>teratoi find monsters fascinating in general. i would ship monsters from various games with each others, and the earliest example is probably charaboms from bomberman or kirby characters. it all went downhill with metroid prime/fusion.>trainer classi used to think gsc campers were short-haired girls and they always spoke to me as doing the kind of travelling that pokemon felt all about. i also like the (original) hex maniac because she looked like one of my teachers that i liked (had a crush on). i also like the more traditional witch archetype in general.>real worldguess i'd better install gentoo and move to a cabin, i don't think the government would fuck with a telepathic weather-controlling water dog running free if they found out.>questionask? he's mine, hands off is he a cat or a dog?>songfor a more unusual one, i can hear it in snowpoint city.
>>56940730>>56940752Even if it were true, there's nothing you can do about it because it's on-topic.
>>56940813Suicune is a cat. Creator confirmed as a leopard. >>56940824Not really if you're going to shitpost and spam your shit all over the thread. That's just attention whoring.
>>56940848It's not spamming just because you don't like Gholdengo.
>>56940824>ontopic>replying only to say "b-but i got the last word!"
>>56940861It's spamming if you're going to samefag and talk to yourself in the most obnoxious way possible. Now can we please ignore the bait and attentionwhores and get back to the thread?
>>56940886This.>>56940752I'm kind of glad it died down, we didn't need ewhores shoving their discords in every post.
>>56940960Then why are you here, if you hate the thread being active?
>>56941021Never said I hate it being active, don't put words in my mouth.
alright sippers, kindly stop engaging with bait or a handful of posts you don't like in either direction, all bickering does is make jannies stop cleaning up and invites raidingi had a shitty week so couldn't post much, but we had been thinking of trying a kind of mid-thread writing prompt, but i didn't have time to prepare one this time! do you think you would prefer having it at the start of the thread or posted a few days in to keep activity throughout?>>56940848yeah i'm aware of the canon, mostly wondering what people think of him as themselves. suicune strikes me as the most dog-like or even deer-like of the three, but i kind of struggle to read him as anything.>>56940307the artist had a few raichu pics from before and uploaded new ones just a couple of days ago. so much on pixiv doesn't even use the pokemon x human tag, so it's worth looking at individual mon tags as well.
save me handsome pokehusband
>>56941120A writing prompt sounds fun. Maybe for this thread post it a few days in but in the future it could go in the start of the thread to give people more time to write it.
Coinfuckers have been here since the early start of these /Pokeyume/ threads, no one had an issue with them, or others having the same husbando, so what's the sudden mentality that they're all one person now, or are you guys new?
>>56942370Why are you trying to start shit again? Fuck off
>>56942370its not normal so just ignore lol. people all have their husbandos and they all belong. >>56941120yeah theres no way to see all the good pics without going through the regular mon tag. difficult but people just never even tag more than that. also yeah we gotta do the prompt thing cause its a good idea.
>>56941533I'd love a writing prompt.Gives me a way to enjoy the thread besides bumps disguised as shitposts
>>56942785to add to this i put down activities and some questions last time i edited. i was also busy with all the booru stuff so i didnt do prompts yet. maybe mid thread makes more sense? i dont mind at the start though.
>>56938785>they thought typhlosion is probably handsome to women and fits the yokai shoujo story so why not just paste him inI want to believe this and it makes sense, but at the same time, it's hard to believe the stories were written in good faith when the only Pokémon used in them are at best very low C-listers that the average Poketard wouldn't miss (no offense to Octillery and Rapidash, cause I think they're underrated but Octillery is the embodiment of forgettable johto shitmon, and even with the Kanto Bonus Rapidash is still a literal who) . Point is, it's bizarre how none of the "important" Pokémon that always show up everywhere were used here. Where's Gardevoir's sex story when it basically a bride already? Where's the Charizard rape fic when sucking Zard Dick is all those retards at Game Freak know how to do? >gf might treat him like jynx now.that's the worst part. Game Freak is too stupid and cheap to buy a VIN, a hacker broke the law, retarded /Vp/edos mistranslate it, news outlets swoop in like vultures and spread the mistranslation, and every non-Typhlosion fans treats it like a worse version of pedobear/Epstein/Diddy rolled into one. Typhlosion fans are the victims and only decent people in this mess, yet we're the ones having all our toys taken and getting the belt from Daddy Game Freak. >my fav is already a regret topic for gf so id just be glad about all the extra artngl the extra art is nice and I don't believe there's a "wrong way" to enjoy Typhlosion even if it doesn't line up with my exact taste what is your fav anyway>always just claim things for yourself anywaytrue but this situation still sucks >>56931030Maybe it would be more accurate to treat "male gaze' like a spectrum. Only an infinitesimally few men would actually like a picture with only "male gaze" elements
>shiny fug coming to raidsoh shit another of my husbands. most of mine come from gen 3 and i love that dragon
>>56937681Still here but too lazy to post.
>>56942918All of this stuff is only a problem in the entry-level of the pokemon fanbase. If you are a serious fan, or a normalfag casual pokemon fan, I can't see how you would care about any of this. No one is a victim, and describing it as a mess is a bit hyperbolic if you're anyone other than GF. This will have no effect on the mainstream fanbase or reputation of the franchise. Do you know how I know? I'm also a Sonic fan. Sonic printed money even when the 3D games were shit before the fanbase got all weird and sexual in the mid-2000s, and it still prints money no matter how shitty the games/fanbase get. If your game has Zelda, Pokemon, Mario, or Sonic in the name, it's going to sell 5 million+ copies. The grandmas, and parents, and aunts and uncles who constitute 90% of Pokemon's sales buying the games for children are not going to google "latest Pokemon sex scandal." None of this matters to anyone, but if you're extremely inside the fandom it seems like it does.You mentioned Rapidash and Gardevoir, calling Rapidash a literal who and Gardevoir an important pokemon. The opposite is true outside of the pokemon fandom. Rapidash is a Gen 1 mon who was featured in the 1st season of the anime's OP. Every single person who was alive in 1999 in America, Japan, Latin America, and the EU knows Rapidash is a Pokemon. That's 1 billion people who see Rapidash and know it's Pokemon. And at least 300 Million of them know it's Rapidash. Pokemon has never remotely reached that level of mainstream popularity again, less than 100 Million people could probably name Gardevoir.Don't let the internet convince you shit that doesn't matter is important. There are almost no negatives to this situation. I would probably have not played any game newer than Gen V if this scrapped lore didn't leak because I vastly prefer the old lore (pokemon and animals both exist, pokemon takes place on earth etc.) to the new stuff. I only played Legends: Arceus because of the leaks and these threads.
>>56943883>husbands
something something blowjob male povhttps://files.catbox.moe/obnmuu.png>>56896910this should have been posted sooner but my headache threw me off
>>56944806I wanna know how he'd look from her perspective.I have barely ever seen human's pov on monster stuff.
>>56926397>Thinking it's good world-building because it resembles actual myths and religious stories.Now here is your mistake. You know it does resemble that and I know it.But here is the thing: 99% of people, especially young generations like Z straight up have no idea what those are like.They have never been exposed to it.Most of all, they have never been exposed to media that wasn't made in the last 15 years. To some of them even something from 2004 is "too old".They have only known extremely cleaned-up corporate mandated story slop.
>>56944951You're in a pokefucker thread. It's the opposite of 99% of people.I don't entirely disagree with you, but I don't really care to discuss this outside of the context of it's effects on Pokemon, and again, I see no downsides. Pokemon will not lose engagement with young people, engagement with older fans has clearly increased. Artists are drawing. Writers are writing.
>>56926076I just realiced the dripping faucet placement. Wtf are they doing over there?>>56939157I could tell it would take a drift into the unappealing when the instrumented started getting bigger.
>>56944941ah yeah one of my favorite things and a pain im familiar with.https://files.catbox.moe/zv9tll.png>>56896910
>>56917622This is nice, I really like how Deoxys stands out against the landscapeHe's my second favorite legendary so it's nice to see appreciation for him>>56917415You have some fantastic art anonI'm really starting to like Hitmontop, he's cute, might put him on my long list of husbands as well>>56944806Now this is some good stuff! Love the multiple views and the progression, we need more art of Typh like thisHow long did it take you to draw this? Are you all going to post your art to the booru?
>>56945368huff huff huff
>>56945373thanks! hard to say because of that headache. if i manage to get something done really fast then 1-2 days. that one took kinda long cause things didnt go as planned. im normally kind of a slow artist but the thread helps make me draw more.>>56945454based
cute and canon
>>56945040Oh I'm sure it won't matter. Like, people already stopped caring anyway.But that's the mindset you have to expect when it comes to public opinion.
>flaming badger with dog cock Well tough shit, I thought you foids would be more creative when it comes to cunt-fulling implemments of your husbandos…
>>56948556the genius admires simplicity
>>56948556I mean men slap the same big titty big ass body type on every fictional women they draw (including Pokémon), so why act as if you're superior lmao
>>56948556Part of it is likely familiarity or reference availability - the furry fandom is a bit incestuous in references, in part because it's a lot more comfortable to look up yiff than zoo stuff. Horse and dog dicks are pretty common, but cat dicks have only started growing more popular in the last few years: a few artists found a way to make them look appealing, and others began to copy that design. Hell, if I tried my hand at a badger, I'd go to Strega's gallery before I'd ask /an/.Everyone else gets one of the existing dicks, or a generic cone - if the non-human is aquatic, the cone is likely prehensile.Also, folks into pussy aren't exactly speaking from a high ground. Canine pussy has only gotten traction in the last 5 or so years, and horse pussy is driven 99% by bronies. Everything else is human, with the occasional "cloaca" (which usually winds up just being human without drawing an asshole, anyway).
>>56944775> This will have no effect on the mainstream fanbase or reputation of the franchiseI actually don’t give two shits about the franchise’s or GF’s reputation, Just Typhlosion’s. (Not necessarily because of the leak, I’d already been getting increasingly jaded on Game Freak’s laziness and Pokefan’s stupidity for a long time before the Tera leak) but I kind of get what you mean. >less than 100 Million people could probably name GardevoirOut of curiosity I looked up that 2020 poll where Gard was 3rd in Hoenn. It got about 60 thousand votes. So what you said checks out. While it clearly doesn’t represent every Gard fan, it does help put things in perspective> 90% of Pokemon's sales buying the games for children are not going to google "latest Pokemon sex scandal”True but one of the first things to comes up when searching Typhlosion is Forbes article referencing it going viral for all the wrong reasons and even in Typh’s Wikipedia page which it has now due to this, so it’ll be the first thing anyone knows about when they look up Typhlosion (though surprisingly the articles seem to actually give somewhat decent mythical context about the story so IF anyone bothers reading they’ll see it as a Beauty & the Beast story with a Yokai twist it is than the “lol T.Diddy’s a rapistrino hide yo kids” the unfunny memes want it to be. Keyword being IF>There are almost no negatives to this situationAlmost no but I feel Typhlosion’s identity being forever branded “pedophile” and me being treated like a creep by association is a rather huge negative. First I am a rapist because stupid cunts hate men so much they compare us to bears, now I’m a rapist for liking a cartoon badger, fuck that. Lol, in the context of this particular thread topic the stupid ass ManvsBear “debate” gets turned in its head, completely falls apart and becomes a mind screw but I think you get my point
>>56948556(nerd voice) Uhm Acktyually its a tapering dick+knot and not a canine cock. you can tell by how the base of the cock is thick and then gets thinner towards the tip. there is also no canine dick tip on it. also typhlosion isnt technically a badger or even an animal at all. hes a pokemon and we cant forget that real animals used to exist in pokemon before they got retconned. (nerd voice off)incoming autism. yeah i dont draw super obscure cocks because i like anime and unapologetically support cone supremacy. i mean eh i already dont like the tip part on dog dicks. normally id just draw him with only a cone but people talked so much about him having a knot that he just has one now cause i started liking that idea for him. also i like thinking pokemon have cones to stay compatible with each other (and humans) when it comes to sex. i guess you could make an argument for different egg groups maybe having different dick shapes if you wanna be more out there (not that i care if people love drawing exotic animal dicks) but for me its just not as appealing. also when we are talking about sensations then i gotta say id rather add ridges to it that stimulate the g spot.. knot like structures... the ability to cum multiple times... aphrodisiac precum.. or just make it big. things i can imagine the feeling of more easily.
>>56948742I actually hate tits on non-mammals though, don't even care about them on humans since it's not a sexual organ. >>56950368Conedicks are for smol cute PKMN bois, also thanks for actually replying >>56918989How does he do it?
>>56950914What pokemon do you think would feel the nicest to get licked by and why?
>>56951035Something big enough to have a large tongue, (big enough to cover a persons head,) and something that lacks noxious elements so nothing poisonous or rough or etc. First instinct would be Lickitung but its tongue is mentioned to paralyze things it licks. Greninja is a second choice but being a ninja frog its tongue might be poisonous despite not being explicitly confirmed. I’d say Wailmur (Wailord has the opposite problem of being too big) or Cetitan on a warm day and Arcanine in a cold day. Though I wouldn’t be too against the idea of being slightly stunned while Lickitung and Greninja wrap their tongues around me
>>56951035I always wanted to get licked by a Haunter
anyone else love male lugia and feel strange about it because of the whole creator backstory where it was supposed to be a girl and it made the creator depressed
>>56948556Stay mad humie ;3
>>56950368>i guess you could make an argument for different egg groups maybe having different dick shapesWell, we know Field + Water 1 makes the human penis, and I think at this point it's safe to assume the Dragon group gives you hemipenes, since most of the snakes are there, and Garchomp gets to have 'em. The Grass and Bug groups are self explanatory enough to run with.Is that enough to start filling out the egg group genitalia chart?
>>56950368>>56953317>egg group genitalia chartHonest to God wish that was a real thing. Should've been in the leaks desu
>>56951035Who else but him?
>>56953317>Field + Water 1 makes the human penisHaving trouble parsing this. As in, Pokemon in either group have a human dick, or only Pokemon in both have one? Can't agree with either, personally: first one puts way too many human penises out there (Field is MASSIVE), and the second means that Primarina has a human dick, and I'd much rather he get something more flexible, possibly slightly prehensile. Dragons getting hemipenes is good.>>56950368I'd personally prefer egg groups guaranteeing certain qualities (Dragons get hemipenes, Fairly precum is a potent aphrodisiac, Grass tastes sweet, etc), but there still being variety between species (Serperior, Grass/Field, has hemipenes, while Meowscarada, also Grass/Field, has one with soft "barbs").
>>56953482be the change you want to see in the world, anon
>>56953610Well I could make one, but I wish that it would be canon is what I'm saying
>>56953606>in, Pokemon in either group have a human dick, or only Pokemon in both have one?I was saying only the combination has it. Since that's, as best as can be told, the human egg group. There's probably some pretty consistent patterns that might emerge with the kinds of pokemon that have a particular egg group pairing, but, I don't really know enough pokemon's egg groups off-hand to say for sure. While there's probably room for rare exceptions, especially for pokemon with very strong animal theming, whose egg group would conflict, those exceptions should be, well, exceptional. There's also obviously room for small amounts of variation just based on things like body composition, size, color, ect. While some pokemon will probably end up with unfortunate genitals, it would be interesting to have a reasonably accurate rule of thumb for looking at a pokemon, and knowing what its cock or vag looks like. If you run hard with individual combinations having a particular dick, then there's also plenty of space for duplicate dicks. More than one way to get hemipenes, for example, or you might be able to have both a cone-knot group, and assemble a cone-knot out of a pokemon with a cone group and a knot group.
MmmmSo our groupsWater 1 (Unfocused watery things, and less obligate water inhabitors?)Water 2 (Fish, for the most part)Water 3 (Shellfish, crustaceans, and weirder gribblies) Bug (bugs)Flying (birds)Grass (Plants)Mineral (rock monsters and machines that aren't robot enough for Undiscovered) Monster (Kind of a catch-all for weird, traditionally biological, but indistinct animal pokemon)Field (Basically all mammals, and some reptiles)Dragon (Most reptiles, dinosaurs, and dragons, obviously)Fairy ("Little guys". Lots of indistinct non-animal biologics. Maintains difference from Monster is mostly if it's cute or gribbly.)Amorphous (slimes, gasses, ghosts, weird stuff that's hard to define as life. And, uh, Gardevoir.)Humanshape: Pokemon that look like guys. Apparently not humans though? Ditto (Go fuck yourself) Manaphy (Thanks Phione)Undiscovered: I'd break it down into Babies (do not fuck)Robots (Make penis into robot)AndLegendaries (actually completely viable, just here for balance reasons. Each one can probably be categorized into other groups, by dead reckoning and vibes)I probably missed ones or two.The easiest ones are Flying, Grass, and Bug, since all those are a pretty close knit group of very similar pokemon, with note of a few outliers. Bug and Flying have Bug and bird dicks, respectively, Plant is just working on the spectrum of seeds, spores, flowers, pollen, catkins, and other plant pornography words.Dragon is a bit vague, but people fucking love big, throbbing hemipenes, so the image has stuck.Humanshape WOULD have been an easy one like, three months ago, but with the leaks suggesting humans themselves are actually Water 1/Field, it's harder to say. Worth noting, pretty much only like, Machoke, Gardevoir, Sawk & Throh, and maybe one or two others are actually like, humanish. MOST of the group is actually furries like Lucario, Lopunny, and then dipping into things like Electabuzz
>>56954018I might guess that Amorphous might not even have traditional genitals at all, instead just kinda... "mixing" goo directly. I also get vibes that Water 3 is mostly boring, external egg fertilizers. Lots of jerking off into the ocean, except instead of jerking off, it's just cumming.
What are some thoughts on extreme size difference pokemon?Ones that you probably can't have traditional sex with, so would have to either exclusively have very limited kinds of sex with, or pure romance?
>>56954074>extreme size difference pokemon?i like themi really like being super small to them, and i kinda like the idea of barely being able to do anything "real" with him. Rayquaza is probably one of my favorites, and the idea of that much difference is really cozy to me. i also like the idea of having to use my entire body to please him, and barely being able to have the tip in me, but, its a lot more about just being cozy like that. i dunno why i'm like this
[/spoiler]Seeing more than 1 badgerfuckee in here wasn't a huge suprize to me, but now I'm more wondering if the girl who's into smol cervid boys is also lurking ITT…>>56948687>>56952099I guess that all I have to say for my defence is that I'm suffering from a dogenis fatigue quite badly, you have no idea how much it pisses me off to see just how much cat'mon smut is there with them wielding inexplicable doggonads instead of a cute but menacing spiky catenis.
>>56954018>>56954040I agree that amorphous shouldn't have traditional genitals, but amorphous also has a lot of objectmons and it's hard to imagine a way that can work. How is a drifblim, banette, or wobbuffet going to get you pregnant?For the fairy egg group, I think a good candidate for their trait is extreme size variation. So your raichu could have a massive member that puts human men to shame, or your wigglytuff can be too small to find under his thick fur. What you get is a lottery that has little connection to the overall size of the Pokemon's body and genetics.Since humans aren't human-like, I'm all on board for something super weird about humanlike pokemon, but I'm not sure what that would be. All my ideas are either too out there or not out there enough. It should be something shocking and amusing, but flexible enough to add to the appeal of most human-like pokemon. Maybe they're specifically less compatible with us for our field or water 1 traits? Like, maybe they're too delicate/sensitive for a humans initial expectations? It think it adds gap moe, but people who like those pokemon may disagree.For monster penises, I think excessive cum volume fits them, and maybe large balls to match.
>>56954928nta but deer are great. feel like not using gender differences in those 2 deer pokemon was a bad idea though. little weird to have female stags. also bambi looking so cute yet being a boy probably makes me like male deerling.also feel like its better to ask artists on the web if theyd draw this or that as a request cause youre probably more likely gonna get something out of it and it wont demotivate people that cant take it.
going through the zang tag on pixiv to find the untagged stuff.
>>56956044>also feel like its better to ask artists on the web if theyd draw this or that as a request cause youre probably more likely gonna get something out of itBetter compared to what?>>56956976>"He's probably thinking about how good I am at petting him.">"GOD I fucking hate Sevipers."
>>56957007Aw. Some should get that dog a thumb.
>>56955266I kinda like that for Fairy. I do think a lot of them look really nice with smaller cones/tapers, but them having universally ill-fitting dicks could be cute. Might be a bit too out there, but especially since humanshape is full of things whose genitals would be pretty obvious otherwise... maybe give 'em cloaca? It could work with some of the clothing-mons, too, if whatever their "outfit" is around the groin is actually part of the cloacal exostructure, since some of 'em have even been confirmed that their "clothes" are actually part of their body anyways. In Amorphous, for the haunted/enchanted objects, I just see that as the actual ghost/whatever possessing the object engaging in the whole "essence mixing" thing. Cofagrigus isn't exactly mixing the coffin with anything, rather, the energies posessing the coffin let go for a bit, then swirl around with that Muk or Gardevoir or whatever. Since it's probably what Gardevoir is doing anyways, there could also be a sorta like, "mind meld" esque thing that happens, too. (Funny enough, since Yammask is a dead human, the one way to become compatible with Gardevoir is to die, then you can bang) There's still a couple oddballs in there like Eelectross, who doesn't even have a second egg group to fall back on, which, either someone can be more imaginative than me, or that's one that is an exception.
Gigamega autistic rambling incoming, apologizing in advance, feel free to ignoreI am not sure where to post this, since the /toy/ pokémon thread is dead, but I recently bought a new Arceus sofubi from when the movie about him released. I did this because I had the same exact sofubi when I was little and wanted to see how much it's different from the new one.Well today it came in. Mine is way more short, for some reason, probably the limbs giving in? It's also way more yellowed out, has a lot more paint scuffs and it seems like he went through three different world wars. Compared to the shiny new one it's like they're two different figures altogether. It's kind of depressing but at the same time I'm glad I have so many memories of him and me pretending to replay the movies in my head. Moral is, love changes things, I guess?
>>56954928Both of the deer are pretty hot in their own ways.
>>56951035I like the feeling from small, lapping tongues, myself.I know that's not exactly the most creative, to the point there's probably like, 200 pokemon that fit the bill, but I just like the feeling
>>56954928Deer are cuteI don't really like the whole stag aesthetic, but deer are sexy as a whole.
found this randomly while the thread was talking about deer