/vtai/ - VTuber AI-generated Images - :3Previous Thread: >>87602143>/vtai/ Wiki (WIP)https://vtai4ch.art/>/vtai/ Resourceshttps://rentry.org/vtai/ | FAQ: https://rentry.org/vtaiFAQ | VTuber XL Loras: https://rentry.org/vtaiSDXL | VTuber LoRAs (ARCHIVED): https://rentry.org/vtaiLoRAs | LoRA Checklist: https://rentry.org/vtailorachecklist | EF+HLL Guide: https://rentry.org/5exa3 | VTuber Model Mixes: https://rentry.org/vtairecipes | VTuber Prompt List: https://rentry.org/vtaiprompts | Embed/Thread Archive (OLD): https://rentry.org/vtaiarchive | vtaiArchive: https://rentry.org/fhydhwdm>/vtai/ ScriptsCatbox Scripts: https://github.com/CCC-anon/CCC-Scripts/tree/main/catbox>/hdg/ FAQ + Embeds, Hypernetworks, Models, LoRAshttps://rentry.org/hdgfaq | https://rentry.org/hdglorarepo | https://rentry.org/59xed3 | https://rentry.org/ponyxl_loras_n_stuff | Pony Artist/Character Hashes: https://lite.framacalc.org/4ttgzvd0rx-a6jf>Cloud Hosted Installs (Now Require Payment)Colab for Complete Retards: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1STL60qfoY-iSlhRb9zFETRLTqhNbznRf | Colab: https://colab.research.google.com/github/TheLastBen/fast-stable-diffusion/blob/main/fast_stable_diffusion_AUTOMATIC1111.ipynb | Paperspace: https://rentry.org/865dy>/vAI/ doko?https://rentry.org/where-is-vai>GPU Performance Datahttps://docs.getgrist.com/3mjouqRSdkBY/sdperformance>More Resources4chanX Catbox userscript: https://rentry.org/hdgcbTags: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/tag_groups5ch NovelAI wiki: https://seesaawiki.jp/nai_ch/Models: https://civitai.com/ | https://huggingface.co/More links: https://rentry.org/sdg-linkGetting Started (Legacy): https://rentry.org/sdhypertextbook>Related>>>/aco/sdg>>>/g/sdg>>>/g/ldg>>>/d/ddg>>>/e/edg>>>/u/udg>>>/vt/vtai>>>/vg/aids>>>/b/degen>>>/trash/sdg
Request anchor
>>87613399New model, woohoo. If I understand LAX correctly, this is 13 epochs? The last test version that was uploaded to huggingface was epoch 3, so that's a pretty significant jump.Gonna need to test some stuff, but happy to report that illustrious loras are still very much compatible (look at this silly little cc).Sadly, it still doesn't seem to know cc on its own, despite having learned characters like Ellen Joe, and still struggles with hajime and I feel like kanade might also not be fully known, but at least the others work well. Makes sense when you look at the image counts, and it's still an improvement at least. Maybe later versions will learn them, we'll see.>>87614522>It shows up in her posing too.Yeah, pretty nice that those associations just exist>>87635229Dog wife is for petting, not beating>>87638223That's paint, right?>>87669398That looks very pretty>underbakedYeah, I think Euge said it was done for just a few 100,000 steps, and you can really feel that. Still, there's something there that just isn't in the eps version, so hopeful for future conversions. There might be a vpred version coming of the 0.5 noob version as well, though not sure>>87671066Nice roboco>artistmixesYeah, they seem pretty different from my tests already. Glad I only just started my mix mining, so I can just switch to the new model>>87673730>epsilon predAs far as I understand eps pred is the default for most models, so I don't think it should be incompatible with anything that works for others. Or do you mean in terms of merging with models? In that case it might work with illustrious based models, since loras still work, not sure about others though. I know illust was compatible with SDXL based models, somewhat at least, so might be worth a try.>artifactingStrange, haven't noticed any artifacting. Or at least it's much less noticable than it was on Illust, which was easy enough to get rid off. What are your parameters?>>87674453cute
>>87676706wawa died and got rezzed early so she's stuck as a grumpy loli
>>87676706Requset for Kaminari Clara in overalls only. Background of your choice but a strange/liminal farm would be nice if it is not too much of a trouble.
>>87677054I merged Noob 0.5 with an Illustrious finetune and it was giving me a weird texture, almost like a pencil cross hatching. It was extremely noticeable on inpainting, less so on initial gen.Maybe I'll try some different merges later.Base model is fine, looks a lot better than EA and Pred.
>>87676706Requested Flare in a Hooters outfit in a bathroom getting groped and impregnated like picrel but with her eyes closed please: https://files.catbox.moe/uhg96i.jpeg
>>87677109
>>87677736cuuute
>>87676706requesting :3
>>87677736>>87678606
>>87678793thanks :3
>>87669804could I get a box for this one?
https://files.catbox.moe/4wzm6f.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/s26ln4.png
>>87677412Mhm, that's very strange. Which finetune did you try to merge it with? I just tried it with pasanctuary at a simple 50/50 merge (once with 50/50 clip, and once with 100% noob clip), and while it has a bit of that illustrious roughness, I guess that's a given in a model containing more of base illustrious. Inpainting didn't really feel worse either
Day 18: CoupleI would think with Illustrious easily clearing 2girls this should be pretty easy for prompters
>>87676697
>>87676706What's the story with this bike?
>>87679260IIRC, it's something about prompting Mori on a bike but she didn't appear or something
>>87676706Suisei and Choco-sensei in a supermarket, both with ponytails and casual outfits, grabbing groceries for a later cooking collab
>>87679056I did a different merge and it seems fine.The finetune I used had a bit of pony in it too, maybe that messed with it.
>>87679348Ah, yeah that would do it. When I tried merging base Illust with other models, I had to be increadibly specific, or I encountered had similar problems.
>>87679318I see, thanks.
>>87679348Adding some black magic to soften it...
>>87678606
>>87676706femboy tenma getting railed by that femboy lizard maid from black souls 2
>>87679550Suismug :3
>>87676706Hags teaching some sex education in school and asking for volunteers for a live example.
>>87679100
>>87676706Rerequest >>87630570
>>87658620thanks for the juicy Marine nips!
>>87679012Moona erect nipples under clothes is my favorite thing of all time
>>87679546And done. I think I've got a competent Noob 0.5 model now.Outfit has some mistakes but that's stuff the base models do too, this is more of a style and hands test.
>>87678303Cute
>>87680391Great abs on Subaru
>>87680391Oh boy people weren't kidding when they said artists work differently.Tried a bunch and they all look very wrong.Raita, Wada, Eroquis and a bunch more.It clearly knows them but they don't feel right.
>>87674834Dropped here to say, those were some epic Wawa
>>87676706Moribike my beloved
>>87676706Justice actually doing their job and catching/arresting Advent
>>87680770>Tried a bunch and they all look very wrong.Really? I wouldn't say any of the ones I've tried look "wrong", but there's a big difference in what the model has picked up on vs the pony LoRas I have. In the same way I feel like there's also a huge difference between some LoRas of the same artist too.I've used both Illustrious-XL SmoothFT and Simple Illustrious merge and the same artists look shockingly different on both of these illustrious models. Nyanctha for example gets ultra thick rough lines on all images on SmoothFT, but they get way smoother on Simple.
>>87681349I can't even get a Raita gen that looks good enough to post a comparison.It looks like you Gave Raita a sheet of paper, a box of crayons and told him to draw tits.And he did a respectable job of it, I suppose, but still.I can get decent Raita looking images on Illustrious (various finetunes) and Noob 0.1.If it was just him I'd chalk it down to one artist being fucked/needing a new prompt, but I have yet to find a single artist that looks right.
>>87681726From some more testing, it's something to do with one of the LoRas I baked in. I think.Strange because it's the same ones I used on 0.1. And they look great on base gens.But I went back to the base merged model, manually loaded the LoRas minus the one that's causing issues, and I can get the artists to look fine again.Weird, but I can live without that LoRa.
Need more testing on 0.5 but it does look quite different with same artist mix>>87679100>>87680027Cute couples
>>87681961Honest question, why are you trying out artists on a model you already baked loras into. I assume, you did so to get a specific style, so that would obviously change what other artists look like.
>>87678873Here you go, it's comfy also has a bunch of experimental stuff in there to try and wrangle the Vpred model. Let me know if you just want the prompt.https://files.catbox.moe/0bqje2.png>>87677054Good the LoRAs are still compatible. Cute CC>>87678793>>87678303Fuck these are cute>>87679100>>87680027Based Yuri, love Yuri>>87680791Dang brat needs to get grounded for a week >:>>87681961NTA but that's good, was scared forgetting was starting to happen, Most of my mixes have changed though, gotta re-weight.
>>87682121Cute and the rare good handholding!
>>87676706fubuki and mio making out in the shower
>>87676706Lamy with a champagne bottle between her breasts, and popping it open with a paizuri.
>>87682140The LoRas I baked into it are low weight and are meant to improve anatomy, backgrounds, colors, etc.>I assume, you did so to get a specific styleWhile they're nominally "artist" LoRas, they're closer to checkpoint extracts in what they do and what I use them for.The base outputs are a lot prettier, but it's not reproducing any specific style.If I baked a strong artist LoRa into the model, I'd just have a model that does one artist well and nothing else. I just load a LoRa normally or prompt for a specific artist if I want to reproduce their style.>>87682216They still look different, but now it's at a reasonable level, where different prompting can most likely improve it.Before it was horrible. I don't know why 0.5 goes nuts with that one LoRa, only when prompting artists. Oh well.
>>87682543>are meant to improve anatomy, backgrounds, colorsHm, I see. I'd still think this would probably influence the style, but I haven't really used artist loras in such a way before, so can't really speak on it. >they're closer to checkpoint extracts in what they doSo you're training them yourself? Can I ask why you're not doing a concept lora for what you're trying to improve then? So, images of different artists doing the thing you want better, making it not aligned to a specific style. Not trying to sound like I'm dismissing this here, just genuinely curious, cause if that's what you've always done, it obviously worked for other models.
>>87676706I feel like a version of this meme with various vtubers would be useful...
>>87682932useful? useful for what exactly
>>87676706Futa Kiara small or average size preferred
>>87682824>I'd still think this would probably influence the styleAny LoRA will influence the style, but the effect is so small it doesn't really matter. When it works correctly.It's just to get the base output to look softer and better. I'm not a fan of flat, overly 'anime screenshot' type gens.>So you're training them yourself?Nah, I tried a few times but it never really worked out. I just grab, test and combine LoRas.>Can I ask why you're not doing a concept lora for what you're trying to improve then? So, images of different artists doing the thing you want better, making it not aligned to a specific style.I've seen a few LoRas that supposedly improve backgrounds as a goal, and I didn't like a single one of them. Either they're trained to only work for some specific backgrounds (eg. mountains) or they're trained to only work for some specific backgrounds, but don't tell you.I don't think a concept as broad as 'Do what you were doing before, but better' is doable intentionally.>cause if that's what you've always done, it obviously worked for other models.Yup, been doing it since 1.5. Not the same LoRas obviously.
>>87683128Ah, ok if you don't train them yourself, that second part isn't really relevant.>Either they're trained to only work for some specific backgrounds (eg. mountains) or they're trained to only work for some specific backgrounds, but don't tell you.WorldyXL worked in my experience. But yeah, usually they aren't really useful.>Do what you were doing before, but better' is doable intentionally.This is obviously highly anecdotal and a matter of opinion, but I did do a lora that was just a bunch of "good" images, and it did keep the image basically the same but improved a few details like ears, eyes and hands. However at the amount of images(~3000) I used, it was probably more of a discount finetune than just a regular lora. Never really did formal extensive tests, just a bit of AB testing and then just used it from then on, so I can't really say it really did, but it felt like it at least.Also using extracts from dpo improved models also supposedly work. Don't know if I agree, but that was the entire idea behind some of the early attempts at improving illustrious, and some anons swore by it.
>>87683128>>87683524But yeah, you obviously have had success in the past with this, so it's a bit strange. Maybe the Loras for Noob/Illust aren't good enough yet, or it's because the training isn't done yet. Who knows
When the intern gets lazy and decides to train the AI for the Suibot on a dump of internet memes overnight.
