>>11439021
Would love to have you plastered to my ass all day, tiny...
https://litter.catbox.moe/5ihde61jzrcjey4t.png

>>11438842
>Yes, in fact volunteering gets you...THE SOCK™ ®
Then I gladly volunteer

>>11438418
No matter how many tinies you stuff up your ass you’ll still feel empty inside

>>11437570
I’d love to see you recreate the first video but with the wooden figure

>>11439052
If you promise to shrink me to germ sizes then clench your pucker and bury me deep between those wrinkles anon.

>ask gf about the weird glowing patches on her skin
>"Oh those are cities. Yeah I didn't believe it either until the doctor showed me under a microscope."
>"Aliens or something, he said they've been colonizing humans for the last few years. I tried to scrape them off but they keep coming back, and he said they're harmless so I guess it's whatever."
>"Anyway don't worry about them. If they wanna live there then they deserve anything they get."

>>11428773
>goverment is actually sending money to help the shrinking victims, not their perfectly health family members
>Uzaki women take it all and use it to never work again and have sex 24/7
>shrunken men are left to survive on the floor, where careless giantesses or their new master could accidentally snuff them out at any time, and eating content of discarded condoms, because in their carnal extasy the girl regularly forget to feed them

File: 1.jpg (3.6 MB, 3000x4000)

3.6 MB JPG

>>11438796

>>11419478
Holy shit what's the sauce on this one, the ba-bump effects are hot

>>11438997
it's an edit i made since the base is vore, but you can find more by looking up pbysteria

>>11437154
>i wanted to do childlike phrases like "missed me, missed me, now you gotta kiss me"
>but the only pertinent one i know is that
>i thought it might be a waste to just send it with only the one phrase,
in hindsight maybe i can force "ring around the rosie", too, even though obviously she'll be the only one playing such. it might be enough to make sending the caption less embarrassing. but i still struggle with motivating myself to caption unprovoked, so idk if i'll see it through... well, unprovoked

>>11437122
>and the second is both not spread enough to be /super/ gratuitous, and i feel has a mismatching expression; she's hushing the viewer, which kills any plausible deniability for her doing anything but flashing, but her mouth being open doesn't convey a "shh" noise (maybe gens would struggle with that, so this can be overlooked). but the question mark just makes no sense
sorry; i reread these posts in bed on my phone, and i think i was wrong about the intent being a "hush" gesture + expression, which is better for me, anyway, since, again, such would've been too forward to be interesting to me. i think the intent was curiosity, even if the hand gesture + expression is unconventional for such, cause i'd expect more of a "hmm" mouth than an open one. but this tracks with the question mark, anyway. the leg spread is still not wide enough to be a conscious effort, to take the concept to its logical conclusion. but it's an okay gen. more okay than i previously thought

also i thought to link basically the only other smol pp gen i've ever seen (with an erection, anyway), after mentioning smol pps being rare in ai here >>11437116
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11293567/#11297279
>https://files.catbox.moe/0q2lbv.png
>https://files.catbox.moe/uzr4sc.png
https://desuarchive.org/d/thread/11293567/#11297299
>https://files.catbox.moe/zq8a2a.png
i mainly had my eyes on the 2nd one. but the only idea i could come up with for it was a prostitution angle, bullying the viewer for choosing the chubby prostitute. but it being a transaction undermines the passion behind sexuality, so i didn't think i should go with that angle. but the clothing betraying elegance along with her being chubby conveys spending her life indoors and inactive imo, so i didn't think suggesting the guy came across her in public would respect the viewer's suspension of disbelief. but as with the others, i can dig deep to caption this, if anyone would like

File: 1742846585098.png (1.06 MB, 896x1152)

1.06 MB PNG

irony/ fourth wall break warning. original from >>>/trash/slop:
https://desuarchive.org/trash/thread/74000555/#74002947

50 font size (nonstandard for me, due to caption brevity)
110% "gaussian blur" "stroke" (outline)

well, i made an ironic caption conveying my lack of unprovoked inspiration, but it was forced: i realized as i started on it that i can't honestly joke about it; i'm highkey sad that there is no difference between me dropping captions regularly or quitting entirely. it's been a week to the day since i floated quitting caption-making >>11432882, and even if no one has any requests despite all my begging for them, i can't even get a "hey man, i looked forward to your captions. sad to see you quit"? at this point i'd just let the thread fall off the board to hide the shame that was my caption-making, but other content creators have posted their works too, so i can't be so selfish. but if we even reach a new thread, it will just be a bumpfest (hopefully deleted bumps from the 24/7 inactivity), since no one (no one) has any requests, not even gesturing to specific subject matter they liked and would like more of, because there is no audience. not for me, anyway

i'll stop putting on such an embarrassing display in begging for requests and p. much disappear into the shadows i guess, but i still have yet to make the amended video example of the "Boundfat's gaussian blur/glow stroke (outline) text tutorial" in the OP i elaborated on my being able to make in my last (unironic) edit here >>11425968, so i will drop that and post-delete bump the thread, but otherwise stop posting to it, i guess, since idk how to even beg for a request in a novel way anymore

also i figured the smegma genner i was meant to collab with who went AWOL two (2) weeks ago >>11429012 must've felt abused by my constantly flip-flopping between the expressions being okay, only for me to come back and say they were uncaptionable and ask for different in the end. i am sorry. i didn't mean to

later today i'll try to find the energy to add original post date timestamps and .txt transcriptions of my edits to my rentry, and record the amended "Boundfat's gaussian blur/glow stroke (outline) text tutorial" video for the OP i keep referencing, providing a catbox link to it, for the same purpose. at this point idk if even getting a request would make caption-making stop feeling pointless for me, but after that i'll for sure feel over it, so if for some reason 14 max (or near max)-character posts in a row of me begging for a request didn't convince you to ask for one when you wanted to, speak now or forever hold your peace

>>11437682
>pic
kek

>>11438476
responding to myself, but i bothered searching the rentry on the archives and saw some recent-ish hits for it, for what it's worth (isn't mentioned very often either way tho):
https://desuarchive.org/_/search/text/anonaugusproductionsCustomJB/
https://arch.b4k.dev/_/search/text/anonaugusproductionsCustomJB/

i also clicked on one of the february 2025 hits for it that specifically mentioned how little it's mentioned:
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/104219878/#104221078
>Best nonnet jb with great swipe variety. I don't see it being mentioned very often.
and someone replied:
https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/104219878/#104221089
>that, crustcrunch's, and yourreailtaet.
i assume this is "crustcrunch":
https://chub.ai/users/crustcrunch

can't find anything on "yourreailtaet" myself. also, speaking of chub.ai, i saw this post once, if it helps:

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

So, I'm fine with this sort of general tech talk and when I was referring to "/g/ autism" I was more referring to pissing contests over what LLMS/frontends/AI Image generators are best to use and I kinda wish I could've phrased that better. Oh well, thread's doing better than I thought it would.

what the best chatbots to get /d/ stories from

Account required

>>11439230
Anything that's explicitly tagged with /d/ fetishes.

>>11435344
Shame to hear that
I’d hope they’re easing back into it though since they posted a commissioned inflated Sakuya on their fa

File: c7a6865986ee2d13804e835df(...).jpg (77 KB, 960x600)

77 KB JPG

>>11438229
>borderline monogamy and have one or few slave wives
Maybe there is a practice of sister wives?
"Monogamy" in kith society still allows a men to marry his wife's blood related sisters.

>>11438260
>body artists painting up their bodies
Adding to that is the use of women as art/displays of wealth all on their own.
Athletic body types sculpted for master's fetish, breeders showing they are well cared, etc.
Whole idea is that women are seen as extensions of their master/kith.

>>11438501
>women who are understood to be threats
>subject to mental breakage
Darker part of the setting, but like the idea of breaking their minds rather then just assassinations.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 2f5f57d802e6be78f88c4b79e(...).jpg (447 KB, 2048x1536)

447 KB JPG

>>11439231
>Nice green text there
Trying to balance out the sperging and autism posting. World building is fun but it needs to be to the service of spinning a plot.
>Darker part of the setting, but like the idea of breaking their minds rather then just assassinations.
The setting is explicitly post (post, post...) apocalyptic and dystopian. Anti-progressive but without the boogey men and magic a setting like 40k might use and without the science fiction that isolates something like Dune.
And yeah. While the Kith are a masculine society, they are absolutely catty. Conflict is usually settled via honor duels if an agreement can't be reached, which is done by law to limit direct conflict but it does lead to a society where social weight matters a ton and reputation is everything. The high kith understand that it is usually best to gut the opposition instead of kill them. Make their leaders look like fools and degenerates and all but the most hardcore of followers will abandon them. Feminists aren't generally dangerous, and the average feminist is the argument against feminism, but every once in a while it makes sense to utterly shatter one because they might just be dangerous. No one wants to be a cuckold, watching her go from proud feminist to obsessive whore completely changes the narrative. Now she was just acting out because she wanted dick. And in a sense, the propaganda isn't wrong.
>Whole idea is that women are seen as extensions of their master/kith.
Functionally, yes.
>"Monogamy" in kith society still allows a men to marry his wife's blood related sisters.
Monogamists are the butt end of hard liner jokes but some men want to devote themselves to a single woman. Initially this was actually forbidden by law- productive men should have as many heirs as possible, after all- but when it started becoming a problem one of the religious kith recommended a rite for it. Today you can choose to be monogamous but you have to earn the right.

File: 74a7bb6636f2a988d2fac381c(...).jpg (117 KB, 550x825)

117 KB JPG

>>11439231
>>11439258
>Maybe there is a practice of sister wives?
"Monogamy" in kith society still allows a men to marry his wife's blood related sisters.
You're thinking of family surrogacy. Women who come from a lineage of women with low fertility tend to be less valuable, to the point that it isn't unusual for a patriarch to buy four or five sisters. People who practice it tend to point out that it is an extremely successful model, assuming the sisters were already on good terms, but the premise of taking five women with good mutual chemistry and breeding them all in rapid succession so they get pregnant and birth in the same time frame leads to successful outcomes.
>>11432133
>You'll still need to stage-manage things in this phase so that your servile brood mothers can pass as "normal" to the existing social order, but again: there's plenty of models of how to straddle that line once you hit that checkpoint.
Manufactured consent. You take away the rights of women for their own good, and then you tell them that they're better off without them anyways. You allow some women to try and operate in a male dominated space. The few that don't voluntarily withdraw usually end up becoming prime examples of why such a practice needs to be aggressively limited. The ones at risk of succeeding are either the exception- insanely singular talents and oddities- or are made to fail.

File: nyuu.jpg (2.44 MB, 4200x2574)

2.44 MB JPG

>>11439274
Oh, agreed on that part, no question; you "permit" women to aid society however their talents tend so long as they maintain their devotion to their man and the tenets of patriarchy. You need capable zealots. My comment, though, was more about if you imagine patriarchy at the stage where it's like... a few dozen or hundred people total? The stage where you're still not ready to operate in the open... not just yet, because the current "normal" social order still dominates.

File: c4dc972b361a449dd738697b8(...).jpg (318 KB, 1536x2048)

318 KB JPG

>>11439308
Oh, the Moses generation. At that stage you're looking for land in the middle of nowhere to operate like a cult. You're looking for the oddly specific kinds of losers who are receptive to being built up and participating in something bigger than themselves that also builds them into well rounded (read: Loyal) adults. They also need to be the types that people aren't going to look for if they go missing because you need to be able to isolate them from society while you break them down and rebuild them into the vanguard. Yes, that's how cults operate. That's also how most modern militaries operate and virtually any closed society. The age old problem with revolutionary vanguards is that they tend to want to reap the benefits of the society they envision without putting in the work to make it happen. They also tend to be wildly incompetent. You can't have that when the idealized world view you seek to enforce on people is so far outside the norm. As a result, it becomes necessary to form your own pocket civilization.

>>11438460
I'm not sure why I'm talking on a board like I do in texts?? I apologize for the sudden casual-ness of my words lmao

File: 4fc9ae4ea8403d5e0ab6395af(...).jpg (91 KB, 848x1199)

91 KB JPG

>>11438452
Part of it was having the magical penis mutilation ritual performed on me when I wasn't even self aware or conscious and my parents were too dumb to object. Could have been a lot worse but I have less than half the sensitivity I should have. While on adderal I also had less generalized sensitivity so it'd take longer to get going, take longer to hit anything interesting, and take much longer to hit an orgasm. Even off adderal that reduced sensitivity never left so it turns into a frustrating game of navigating lust and libido because if I'm too aggressive I'll just have an unenjoyable prejack bust, but if I don't go fast enough I'm sitting there edging for four goddamn hours.
And no, it isn't all fun and games, finding women who are even remotely sexually compatible is already difficult, finding one I'm sexually compatible with who also has the libido to match is nigh impossible.
>>11438391
>I don't think I've ever change my physical appearance like that for someone, but that's because that's a lot of effort. I'm lowkey lazy, but it's okay
Yeah, you don't want to do that. If you want to try a new style, that's one thing, but nothing good ever comes from doing it to try and make someone else happy. If you hate it, you'll resent having to keep it up, and if you don't, but your partner does, they'll resent you for stopping it.
>>11438453
>They tend to want to attach to someone in some pretty extreme ways.
The reality of being a dom is that you're frequently having to invest the time and effort and emotional energy of putting a woman back together and teaching her how to be stable again and having to accept that at the end of it all, doing the right thing will also mean she (likely) wont be with you. Which is fine- you expect that- but the annoying part is the bit where you're undoing the damage of every loser, psychopath and dweeb that ever inflicted themselves on her did.

File: f718147e8771cdcd1f7b9a8d4(...).jpg (511 KB, 2039x2023)

511 KB JPG

>>11438460
>Panties would be a-dropping if a woman said that to me, shit
Sets off red flags for me. I mean, I'd love to have a woman give that level of submission and devotion to me but that's earned and for them to front load it in a relationship... yeah, I'm probably throwing the brakes and my balls will be blue for a week or two.
>I start full on sobbing because I can't get myself off otherwise
Sounds like you need a bigger collection. I'd ramp it up to at least six. I'd also mix it up a bit and also get some rotors.
>>11438461
There's almost no such thing as over-sharing, we're all anonymous here. Filtering your responses is, if anything, a bad thing. There's no reason to put on airs so you may as well present yourself as you are.

>>11412615
>The endless onslaught of men who generally don't have the emotional maturity to be in a relationship but absolutely want and feel entitled to sex can be isolating for women.

It's why I can't blame nerdy/autistic women for pursuing relationships with other women instead of bothering with men. Most men get raised as if they have no emotions beyond animalistic shit like anger and lust, it fucks us over socially and keeps many of us from truly understanding people the way women get raised to. So the women get burned by shitty man after shitty man until either they think "this is just the way it has to be" and let mainstream society mold them into more servile bangmaids, or they go for other women instead of waiting for the rare man who doesn't treat them like a fuckdoll or unpaid therapist. It's usually the awkward women, the exact sort of woman I'd mesh with well, who wind up taking the latter path.

It's not like we can't change ourselves and learn to be emotionally mature. But it's a long and grueling process, and by the time we finally do grow up (let alone realize we need to grow up to begin with), everyone' s found their one person to settle down with. If we were all just taught to be understanding and mature when we were still kids, we wouldn't have any of these problems and the term "loneliness epidemic" wouldn't exist.

God I wish I were a female NEET gooner so much

File: vAs5pZPaw2i8hxciFxzwJIgY.jpg (2.99 MB, 2020x2867)

2.99 MB JPG

Tried another one, turned out pretty well I think

File: gl0rps.jpg (326 KB, 1407x2000)

326 KB JPG

Which artist(s) does the best belly noises in your opinion? I'm researching

File: 1624306633224.png (1.47 MB, 2000x1764)

1.47 MB PNG

>>11437664
The previously mentioned pbysteria is really good for the way they stylize the text to give each sound a sort of "texture" and the plentiful focus on belly ripples.
Bruppypuppy also does a lot of the same thing, but I don't know if she draws anymore.
Boogie and Softservice do good jobs with typsetting text around bellies.
Cross-cressent and Leshawk's belly grumbling stuff with ripples always makes me feel all sorts of ways too.

https://www.reddit.com/r/curvage/comments/1hy31r3/sometimes_i_cant_handle_how_bloated_i_am_from_all/

>>11438859
Thanks for sharing!

Hopefully they'll do something with the new Z-A Hex at some point

>>11438848
>It's absolutely mind melting, I highly recommend it.
I'm sure it is, you do make it sound very appealing.

File: 11.jpg (401 KB, 1275x1800)

401 KB JPG

https://exhentai.org/g/2491012/3a93fd5c0d/

Nice

>>11426880
What counts as floppy?

>>11439219
>What counts as floppy?

Large, heavy, healthy fullness, hanging enough to floo about. Would make the skin slapping noise if allowed to bounce about during sex.

Not flat and sagging from age.

Not so small and firm that they wouldn't really bounce about. So small they would slide to the sides when laying on their back

File: G7gImygasAAv5Bs.jpg (78 KB, 1332x674)

78 KB JPG

I forgive Graph for all the baits and autistic excuses for not drawing Bailey all this time and everything will be fine until he goes back to being autistic in a few days and my patience runs out in a year or so, like every other time. But I still don't forgive him for not drawing Mattie and Matt having sex even once after all these years.

>>11439282
>More totally NOT dog furshittery, haha!

There's a reason I gave up on him decades ago

File: blue_parasol_by_flattenin(...).png (1.46 MB, 3500x2400)

1.46 MB PNG

>>11438204
No problem, I hope you enjoy the games.

File: ToonFatima .png (401 KB, 1232x1760)

401 KB PNG

>>11438602

Maybe this is too elaborate, but my idea is pic related (she’s a toon) encountering a “real woman”, then smashing her with a giant hammer to turn her into a designer bag. Last step is her happily walking off with it

when it comes to inflatable transformations, do you think that its better if its a pool toy, or an inflatable toy?

File: XdkKgGc.jpg (669 KB, 1160x1200)

669 KB JPG

>>11439284
I can personally do either as long as the idea of bounding a person to the from of an inflatable object is present. Although if I had to pick one I would probably pick inflatable toy cause it would be easier to have sex.

File: 1647117120444.png (320 KB, 888x1243)

320 KB PNG

Bump

these threads are cocaine for my self esteem