The place to actually discuss watches, free of avatarfagging drama, pics of food or drinks, or long-ass stories about your lives.If kofe time posts, just ignore him. He's off his meds and can't control himself.Keep that shit in /wt/.>Your budget>Preferred brand or manufacture>Watch type, e.g. dress, diver, pilot, etc>Movement, e.g. automatic, hand-wound, quartz, etc>Desired features, e.g. water resistance, day/date, chronograph, etc>Preferred strap option, e.g. leather, nylon, bracelet, etc>Wrist size or desired watch sizePrevious:>>18349352
I have this watch and honestly it is the best watch ever made.
>>18352430>I have this watch and honestly it is the best watch ever made.That watch is not a Casio G Shock 5000/5600, I don't understand your post, fren.
>>18352420What are my options for a 36/37mm dive watch under $1000?
Some watches whisper. Others shout. The Tudor Black Bay 54? It hums—a low, deliberate frequency that gets under your skin. And you will want to wear it. Every day.It’s 37mm of perfection. Slim, sharp, unapologetic. A dive watch that respects its roots but knows exactly where it’s going. Vintage character, modern execution—no gimmicks, no fluff.This is design stripped down, tightened up. A gilt dial like aged whiskey. A bezel with nothing extra. Domed sapphire that catches light just right. Inside? The MT5400 movement—no nonsense, COSC-certified, built to outlast bad decisions.It’s confident, understated, effortless. A watch that doesn’t need to shout to be heard.Meanwhile, other dive watches keep getting bigger, louder, and shinier—like they’re trying to outdo each other at a contest no one asked for. The Black Bay 54 skips the circus and sticks to what works. Substance over show. Always.Ladies and Gentlemen, I present the Tudor Black Bay 54.The GOAT
Howdy fellas
>>18352436I don't like the snowflake hands, which make all Tudor watches look weird.
Really want to cop an Omega deville prestige 34mm, im a dude. What do you think about the complication of this watch ?
>>18352439That’s quite the opinion, my friend! Though I’d argue those “snowflake hands” have a rugged, utilitarian charm—designed for legibility under harsh conditions, much like the tools of ancient Nordic seafarers braving icy waters.Speaking of strength and resilience, let’s not forget ancient Rome. The SPQR emblazoned across banners symbolized discipline, power, and order—qualities you might see reflected in Tudor’s bold, no-nonsense designs.But hey, if the snowflakes feel too delicate, perhaps it’s time to channel that Roman grit—hit the weights, embrace some TRT, and conquer your style preferences like a true Centurion!
>>18352437Based
Ali express new years sale coming soon
>>18352446It's OK. Omega's not really known for dress watches. It would be better to get a dress watch from a company that does them better.
>>18352434save more money
He's a busy boy.
>>18352420What is the state of your collection at the end of 2024?What do you intend it to look like at the end of 2025?
>>18352430I want that for my next watcht. SGBX263 owner
Is wearing a watch loose/tight simply preference or is one more /fa/ than the other? I prefer to wear it loose personally.
>>18352471>What is the state of your collection at the end of 2024?picrel. I started the year with around 30 watches and I realized I didn't like having six figures' worth of watches so I started selling them off. These are the ones I've kept.The only watch I bought this year was the Swatchpain. That was mostly just bought as a souvenir from a nice vacation.>What do you intend it to look like at the end of 2025?I want to continue to cut it down.The Patek, the Rolex, and the G-Shock are keepers. As for the others, I might combine them into something, like a Bvlgari Octo Finissimo or an APROO. Or I might just get rid of them altogether.
>>18352420>If kofe time posts, just ignore him. He's off his meds and can't control himself.>Keep that shit in /wt/.Janny! There is an avatarfag in my non avatarfag thread! Send him to the electric chair immediately or I will dock your pay
>>18352511To an extent it's preference but at the end of the day it's actually more about the dimensions of your wrists and finding the correct fit for the size and weight of your watch and the materials of the watch. Your watch needs to be tight enough that it doesn't swing around sloppily all over the place but loose enough that it would never leave excessive impressions on your wrist or constrict your wrist as you flex or twist it around its range of motion. But a lighter watch with a bracelet can probably be worn a little more loose than a big heavy watch, and the same watch might be more comfortable worn looser on a rubber or leather strap than you would wear it on a metal bracelet because of the added friction of those materials and how sweat might make them a little more grippy rather than more slippery. It takes a little trial and error.
>>18352511Like >>18352523 said, a lot of it is preference and a ton is specific to each watch based on its weight and the band material, but I find a good place to start is to make it as loose as possible bit not so loose that it can spin around the wrist, then make it a little more snug from there, to your preference.
>>18352515I don't get owning more watches than I can wear in a week. I would feel bad for the ones I don't wear.
>>18352535I have about a dozen watches I wear with regularity but not in a week. I don't really have a schedule set, but I have 2 work watches that I'll alternate wearing every month or every week or so or however often I feel like it, I wear one of those every day that I go to work and when I'm not at work I'm wearing one of the others for maybe a week or two at a time. Each individual watch might go a few months at a time without being worn, but that's not going to hurt them.
>>18352536>>18352535I used to enjoy having a big collection, but I've been collecting watches for nearly 2 decades and I've come back to the idea of having a small number of really choice pieces. It's not so much that I felt bad for owning a watch that I rarely wore; truthfully, I'm just kind of getting bored with watches.
I currently have a Seiko 5 Sports Stealth, the model with minutes but with a metal bracelet the hour model (shit was nearly 100 eur)I stumbled upon the watch I'll post next, what do you guys think?I like the black stealthy aesthetic and purple/violet is by far my favorite color.
>>18352545I usually wear black/dark clothes and am a short (5'8) and fairly slim guy so I want a somewhat small watch.
>>18352548I'd like this even more but it's $3000
>>18352540I think as I get more higher end luxury pieces I probably will pare my collection down. One of my dream watches is a Rolex Daydate and I have a bunch of 36-40mm versions of it to cope with not being able to part with the money for one at this stage in my life, I imagine once I have the real deal I'll probably give most of the ones that don't have anything in the way of sentimental value away to friends and family.
>>18352548Sorry. Didn't mean to laugh.That Asstron is fine. Are you sure it's not too big for you though?
>>18352551You should get one of these
>>18352553Is it much bigger? Google says my 5 is 42.5 diameter while the Astron is 42.7.I mean, it's definitely gonna be a bit bulkier but I don't think it's too big.
>>18352557I'm dead set on a black metal strap so I don't think a "classic" look face would look good with it. But I don't know shit about watches.
>>18352545>>18352548>>18352551Is PVD a phase all newer watch people go through? You see a lot of newer people talking about them and my cousin who's not really into watches always points them out when watches come up somehow.I guess coatings are fine but they're not as versatile as brushed or polished steel and a lot of times the coating wears and shows metal under scratches and high friction spots anyway. some people like that kind of patina, probably most don't.
>>18352557That's a really nice choice.
>>18352552>I think as I get more higher end luxury pieces I probably will pare my collection down.In my experience it was the opposite. Once I could afford whatever I wanted, I dropped the habit of selling a watch before buying a watch.
>>18352561yeah, it's worn off on the links but it's not visible until I show it. I actually don't mind the "patina", it shows the watch has been worn.This watch has been through 2 years of basically an army/work camp/prison thing (therapeutic commune) so it has special sentimental value to me.I can't tell you how many times I'd been watching the coated dots for hours in the dark while I was withdrawing and couldn't sleep.
>>18352564Why are you having to detox multiple times at one of those utah rehabs. You're supposed to learn not to do that anymore
>>18352558>I mean, it's definitely gonna be a bit bulkier but I don't think it's too big.What is the thickness and the lug-to-lug. Those are the more important measurements when choosing a watch.
>>18352566I don't wanna go off-topic, but it's a very complex thing, I got clean and literally restarted my life. They have a bunch of connections (with the government) to make you a normal human again. I cooked for 30 people every day for 6 months and among other things, learned how to make and bake classic pizza in a wood oven.That's as far as I'm gonna go about that in this thread.
>>18352515Based collection. You've posted the Explorer II before, right?
>>18352515>5 out of 8 watches are at least vaguely squareSomebody likes squares.
>want to wear a watch>think of picrel>no point because i'll just get watchmogged by richfagshow do i cope?
>>18352576Yep. The Rolex and the G-Shock are the only ones that ever really comes up in these threads. No point in posting the others unless someone specifically asks.>>18352579Lol, you're right. That never occurred to me, but it is true.
>>18352580Rich people who don't give a shit about watches and just buy them because they think that's what rich people do shouldn't have any impact on how you think about or wear watches. They don't matter. People in any price bracket that really like watches will appreciate classic icons like the casios and seikos and hamiltons and all of that stuff. They're the only ones worth talking to about watches.
>>18352580>how do i cope?Either disengage completely or buy a watch that can't be mogged, either because it's extremely tasteful or because there's no real upgrade.For example, you're wearing a vintage Submariner. Someone with a new Sub doesn't mog you because old Rolexes are special. Someone with a gold Rolex doesn't mog you, because they're completely different watches.You're wearing a gold Tank. Someone with a Patek Philippe doesn't mog you because the Tank is an icon of taste and is a choice for people who can afford plenty of other watches as well.
>>18352583>Rolex and the G-ShockDoes a man need anything more?
>>18352572Wish you good luck anon!
>>18352593A Patek.
All the current Calatravas are huge for my taste, very nice watches, but they are not for me. But... If they made something like Picrec...
wish everyone except the sad shitter owners a merry poorfag year 2025
>>18352580that watch was a fakehttps://propstoreauction.com/lot-details/index/catalog/359/lot/118798
>>18352607>All the current Calatravas are huge for my taste, very nice watches, but they are not for me. But... If they made something like Picrec...It's true.It's not so much that they've forgotten how to make timeless classics. It's that they seem to refuse to.
I really like it
>>18352657It's not bad, but the strap is a little too casual and bolstered. The strap would be more at home on a sports watch.You get a strap of Epsom or Saffiano leather, same tone, though, it would look much better.
>>18352660Yeah it’s not the strap that came with it obviously. That was a grey alligator strap that I’m just really not into it, matches with nothing, and probably why I got a good deal on it. I’m still experimenting with different straps to see what goes best.
>>18352552>One of my dream watches is a Rolex Daydate and I have a bunch of 36-40mm versions of it to cope withNever buy cope watches, they never fill the void. A Rolex cope will never feel like a Rolex.I had a Seiko Speedtimer as an Omega Speedmaster cope for some time and it made me dislike the style because it was quartz and not automatic, so even if it looked like a Speedy, it's didn't feel like one.I advise you do sell your cope watches before being even able to afford the real one.
you guys ever have a high accuracy quartz watch? a few posts on previous threads (plus other research) have made me want one
Nano cute
>>18352695Blva are nice
>>18352683Not all of them are copies and homages, they're things like seiko day dates and hamilton khaki king and stuff that aren't really the same experience and aren't really supposed to be beyond the conplications. I like having day and date so I'll keep using them, and in any event they're saving me thousands and thousands of dollars for the time being. I wouldn't otherwise bother buying a cope of a watch that costs under 10k, there are too many good alternatives to subs and datejusts and GMTs to cope too hard over it.
>>18352523>>18352530Thanks bros!
>>18352683I don't understand rolex but I never like the standard normal things other people do just on impulse so it's probably just me. The explorer ii is neat but the boring ones like submariner and explorer i I just don't get. The daydate and date just are a cool design but it is a little girly.
THERE ARE NO AVATARFAGS ONLY ANONYMOUS POSTERS WITH RECOGNIZABLE WATCHES.
>>18352466Cheers
>>18352446Honestly, Piaget
>>18352430ID?
>>183524309 perfect for what it is but not perfect perfect >>183524368 based>>183524376 bracelet and the indicator at the front>>18352515Amazing, but a little bit more originality wouldn't hurt. It's "too safe" (which isn't a bad thing) apart from the BP. >>183525455 the perfect middle ground >>183526576 tough one. Strong Branding though.>>183527517 dislike the noise it makes>>18352847Uhm....
>>18352705You're doing good, the progress can be seen well.
>>18352705Damn it's been a while. Like the other guy said, you've improved a lot. Did you fix the problem where the dial got slowly "un-pressed"?
The OP and the first poster are the same person. Janny shit-eating retard who makes the thread against him only to piss off people who are superior to him by shitting out his diarrhea right from the first post. Keep coping janitor, you are dead inside.
>>18352471for 2025: get a nice leather strap for the speedmaster since the bracelet is uncomfy. thats it>>18352515that calatrava is absolute kinography
>>18352881>noiseWhat are you on about?
>>18352515The Panerai and the G-Shock are the only good ones. Cartier Francaise with a leather strap looks fat and obtuse; also it should only be made of steel or white gold. The Hermes is ugly as fuck. The Blancpain-Swatch is a meme. The rest is too shiny, too perfect, too much CAD SHITTER for my own taste.P.S. A Reverso can not be as large as a 40 mm round watch. Absolute monstrosity.Sorry mate.
I ordered 2 more chinese watches. They were under $60 ea for the new years sale
>>18352911Based chink chonk chad
>>18352914These ones both have sapphire crystals and seiko automatics inside. I can't resist the deals
>>18352840>I don't understand rolex but I never like the standard normal things other people do just on impulse so it's probably just me. The explorer ii is neat but the boring ones like submariner and explorer i I just don't get.I don't know what the hell you're talking about, the Explorer 2 is basically a Submariner with a different bezel. Unless you're talking about the 1655, which is a very different Rolex. In fact, all Rolex sports watches are the same watch with minor differences in bezel, size, etc. The only ones that deviate from the design language are the Explorer 1 and the Daytona. Your tastes don't make you better than others, an Explorer II is not more fun than a GMT or Sub, you just prefer the Exp 2.>The daydate and date just are a cool design but it is a little girly.However, I totally agree with you here. This is because these watches are still sports watches, but the fluted bezel and the President and Jubilee bracelet make them look like jewelry.
>>18352917I literally thought the explorer 2 and gmt were the same thing
>However, I totally agree with you hereblah blah blahanother useless discussion in the ocean of useless 4chan posts
>>18352911You don't really need to buy those watches, you have a problem, shopping is a drug for you, you are an addict.
>>18352918I gues they are basically the same. I specifically like the plain steel bezel with white dial and the red gmt hand. It makes it look different than every diver. Rolex has richard pryor syndrome where you have heard the same jokes told in more modern ways with additional twists from every other comedian for the last 40 years to the point where when you listen to the original act it is boring.
>>18352911what did you get?
>>18352922I bought a lot of cool stuff this christmas season. I also got a pendleton jacket that looks like a carhartt but nicer and with the addition of a-2 style pockets. I also got a new computer chair and mechanical keyboard and computer case. But yeah 4 watches is excessive especially with the new 5000 series gpus coming out
Kofe time.
>>18352918They are.
>>18352881watered down pussified worthless imitation of the original rateguy
>>18352926Pagani 60s omega seamaster and addiesdive hamilton khaki
>>18352928Nice cup of diarrhea, fren. Can you explain once again how that perpetual calendar works?
>>18352515The Patek is almost perfect, but too big for my taste. The Panerai is also very nice, but too big for me. Keep the Rolex and the G Shock. I would sell the rest and buy a nice classic dress watch, like a Cartier Tank.
>>18352930It's either just a retarded newfag or the janny himself.>9 to the shitizen
>>18352927You should stop buying watches.
>>18352935>The Patek is almost perfectHow can people say shit like this? It has nothing of the old, classic Calatrava. It's become a soulless shitter. Too big, too shiny, empty dial. It's atrocious.
>>18352925There is nothing wrong with that, why should Rolex do anything different? That is the problem, doing something different, funny and original, like the Maxi Case destroys authentic classics. If something works, keep it.
>>18352937I mean I still spent under $300 on all of them together. Only one was over $100 because it's a mechanical chrono. The other 3 were $50-60. It really wasn't a huge expense lol.
>>18352938You should read my entire post, dear anon.>The Patek is almost perfect, but too big
>>18352944I did read your post, but the problem with it is not just the size.
>>18352941Yeah I just see a watch when I look at them though. Like something from the unreal asset store, just a stock image of what a watch looks like. If they hadn't decided to start branding their sports watches as luxury I would also find them less egregious as well. When I look up their history it just seems weird that it happened. Like they seem fine as a plain high quality tool watch but they advertise them as luxury now. I guess they kind of had to change their identity after quartz performed better than mechanical. Also once casio started making the watches the military uses and are the quintessential tool watch now.>In the early 1970s, the 18kt Rolex Submariner was introduced and could be purchased for $230, or $1,422 when adjusted for inflation. The stainless steel Submariner with a date had a price of $385, or $2,080 with inflation.
>>18352946There is a luxury version of everything, including actual tools. You can buy a $20 set of wrenches, a $100 set of wrenches, or a $300 set of wrenches with the same number of pieces. You can buy a $60 chainsaw or a $600 chainsaw. It's up to you if you use and enjoy using the tool enough to justify spending the money.
>>18352953In a lot of cases, which means for a lot of item categories, the luxury price is only justified by the bloated reputation of the brand that makes it. You pay the name and not the object.
>>18352957Not really. The tools are going to be better, the question is how much better they actually are and whether you think it's worth it to pay that. Doubling the cost of an item might only make it 30% better or offer better longevity or aftermarket service or something like that.
>>18352548The Astron coating is a huge step up from the regular pvd coating of that 5
>>18352909>Sorry mate.Don't need to apologize. Your opinion is your opinion. I'm wearing the watches, I'll not force you to.
>>18352984Here's your thread: >>18348278
>>18352957Yes...but only once it becomes a luxury product.Your wrench set example is for products that can actually be differentiated. A 20 dollar set of wrenches will be inaccurately cast soft metal. A 300 dollar set will be forged, hardened steel. You're paying for the extra labor, higher production costs and more costly material.Once something becomes a luxury product, price becomes untethered from the qualities of the item itself. The companies are free to raise prices as they see fit and effectively turn their product into a Veblen good. To whine about the rate of inflation and the cost of the item before it was a luxury good is pointless.Rolex, in its case, used to be the 300 dollar wrench set that re-made itself as a luxury good.
>>18352996>Rolex, in its case, used to be the 300 dollar wrench set that re-made itself as a luxury good.And yet it was better as a non-luxury good. The irony.
>>18353000>betterBetter than the competition, sure. But there also were no luxury divers yet. The idea itself was silly on its face. Of course, by the time the late 60s rolled around, there were better divers and Rolex was one choice among many.They definitely had more soul back then than they do now, but I actually think a lot of that has to do with the kind of people who wear them now vs back then.
>>18352897I wanted an Aqua Terra, but every photo i see of it in real conditions, they look like trash.Do you regret buying it?
>>18353000My opinion is that until the introduction of the Maxi Case and the ceramic bezels, Rolex had a lot of soul. For me, the peak was in the 90s and early 2000s. They were already beginning to become luxury watches, but they still maintained the aesthetics of tool watches and classic proportions.You can have a watch with a look close to the golden age, but with a modern movement and solid links.
>>18353019There's also the issue that basically all those upgrades had practical reasons behind them.- Sapphire crystals: scratch resistant- White gold indices and hands: corrosion resistance- Maxi dial: better low-light visibility- 904L steel: corrosion resistance- Ceramic bezel inserts: fade and corrosion resistance- Solid bracelet links: durability- OysterClasp: improved comfortThose are all things intended to improve the watch, whether you personally like them or not.However, they also made aesthetic changes that worsened the product, most notably the Super-Case, making the Explorer II 42mm, what they did to the Air-King, or polishing the lug tops on the DateJust.
>>18352847what's that McDonald's watch?
>>18353035Exactly, I would like a watch with all the improvements you have listed but with the classic proportions.Yes, I know that for many anons it will be a more soulless watch, but for me it has the best of both worlds.
>>18352515>PaneraiIt's one of the good models from the right generation, but I don't like Panerai overall>HermesI don't know anything about this but it looks interesting>G-ShockPerfect, no notes>CartierShould replace it with a Tank Louis, cool strap though.>PatekHoly fucking based. >ReversoYou should replace the Tank Francaise and this with a Tank Louis. Or get rid of the Cartier and keep this. I dunno. You already have the ultimate dress watch in the Calatrava, so what is this even doing in your collection?>SwatchYou said it was a souvenier, so you don't take it seriously, which is good, because you shouldn't>Explorer IIPerfect. My favorite Rolex.Overall a fun and intersting collection with a lot of pieces you don't see everywhere. I like it a lot.If you want to continue to reduce the number (and, I presume) upgrade I would keep the Patek, keep the Rolex, keep the G-Shock, and eliminate the Panerai, Hermes, Cartier, Swatch, and JLC. It's clear you'd want a fun watch, so I'd suggest getting something like an Hublot, Offshore, Franck Muller, Overseas. Maybe something way out of left field like a Ulysse Nardin Freak.
>>18353049>Most of the technology, most of the soulNow's the time to get on them. Those neo-vintage Rolexes will be vintage Rolex soon enough and then they'll be just as expensive as the Rolexes from the 1960s.I always have an eye on the following in case I find a good deal:14060 and 16610 Submariners, 16710 GMT-Master II, 14270 Explorer, and 16570 Explorer II
>>18352890>>18352891Ty. This one was done with the laser cutter. If let's me get very precise results but at the expense of some burn marks on the edges and in the worst case the smoke will stain the top surface like you can see around the text. The dials aren't pressed, that was just attempt one with the Holo watch, I've just gotten better at removing extra material underneath the cardstock to limit the thickness, and added a small ring on the underside around the edge to make the dial dish downward. This makes it so that the hour hand clears more predictably.TMI makes an NH35 version with tall hour and minute hands but those are basically impossible to get out of aliexpress. I guess they're used for Invicta-like designs. If i could get those i could probably add a bit more detail, one more layer of cardstock.
>>18353019>You can have a watch with a look close to the golden age, but with a modern movement and solid linksYes, but not by Rolex. If you want something that is essentially the same as the golden age Sub, you have to invest in something that not only looks good according to classic proportion and aesthetic, but that also might become a new classic in the future.
>>18353056The black burn marks on the border actually fit in some places, if you do your designs with black borders in mind then you won't even notice. Or maybe try to deliberately burn just one side to achieve a shadow effect.
>>18353057>but that also might become a new classic in the future.I don't think a copy of the original can ever be considered a classic.Look at Doxa. Original Doxas can fetch a decent price on the collector's market. Nu-Doxa can hardly be given away.
>>18352933Wtf what perpetual calendar?
>>18353056Can you make a dial using a picture of my gf? She's japanese.
>>18353077>I don't think a copy of the original can ever be considered a classic.I consider your statement to be right, but the issue here is that we will probably never see the birth of a classic again, given how hard it is to conceive new horology innovations. We just don't need them, we don't need more than what we already have, and when there is no necessity to push the boundaries, no innovation occurs. That's why I believe it is much more likely that overlooked models of the past will gain new attention in the future, depending on the oscillations of taste and aesthetics. This alone, if it drags enough interest and money, can determine the status of "new classic" for a watch.In short: you won't see the coming of a "new Sub" in terms of practical and mechanical innovation, but you will definitely see the birth of new classics in terms of how we perceive their aesthetic and their positioning in the watch history. Interpretation plays a big role in this.Pic related (the "svegliarino") was just an obscure microshitter of the 40s, and has been ignored for decades. Until it was reissued as new only few years ago and all the world suddenly realized how cool and important it was.
>>18353054>16710 GMT-Master III really like the Coke, but I prefer the Explorer 2.>14270 ExplorerI prefer 114270>>18353054>16570This one is on the radar, but always with a black dial, I don't like the white dial.Although I like Rolex watches, I would only buy the Explorer 1 or/and Explorer 2.
>>18353096>I really like Cockyeah we know
>>18353100kek exactly
>>18352953The other examples you can see are in fasion. Once a tool article of clothinf becomes obsolete, they have the choice to become a luxury good, change your product to modernize, or become fast fashion and cheapen the brand in order to survive. Another example is in outdoor clothing and workwear. Look at barbour. They were clothing for farmers then the technology they used became obsolete and they rebranded themselves as a luxury good. Levis was workwear and they cheapened the goods and became fast fashion to survive. Nobody would even talk about rolex if they hadn't rebranded as luxury during the 80s when mechanical watches became functionally obsolete and then the watch became a status symbol for the managerial class to wear golfing.
>>18353100>>18353102Here's your thread: >>18348278
>>18353112Stop trying to force the bitters come to the REAL watch thread. This is their thread.
>>18353068I don't mind the borders so much as the scorching that happens on the top surface, I'm still looking for a solution to that. My thought is that having something like a post-it note on top or similar paper adhered to the surface will keep the top plane free of scorch marks, and I'd be able to remove the sacrificial layer after cutting. But I only tried that on small parts so far, and was unable to separate the sacrificial layer consistently without damaging the cardstock part that I wanted to keep. But that's a problem for the next dial.>>18353083Can't do imaginary friends sorryI also got this Hamilton recently, it's in decent enough shape but needs a cleaning and maybe a new mainspring. It looks like someone replaced the crystal to sell it but the amplitude is way low and rate is way off.
>>18353119What's that from, the early 70s?
>>18353115>the REAL watch thread.Hmm...they're having an argument about avatarfags and headcanon. I think I'll stick to our discussion about neo-vintage Rolex and luxury branding strategies.Back to /wt/ for you.
>>18353122Late 50s, the first service marks in the case read early 60s.K-576, it was in production from 1956 for four years according to this guy's research http://www.hamiltonchronicles.com/2015/04/1956-k-576-calendar.html
>>18353143Interesting. It says Swiss on the dial. I thought Hamilton was in the US a lot later into the 20th century? Was there a period where they had a facilities both in the US and Switzerland?
I'm thinking of buying a new square G Shock. I'm leaning towards the premium models with a steel case. I'm torn between the new DW5000R and the GW5000U.>The DW5000R has a similar design to the original square one with a simpler module.>The GW5000U has a solar panel and Multi band 6.Which one would you choose?
>>18352958Not really, you say? Take a look at this tool.https://www.woodlore.com/shoe-trees-inserts/mens-cedar-shoe-trees/mens-combination-cedar-shoe-tree-pair/https://www.church-footwear.com/us/en/p/cedarwood-shoe-tree/A338SX_9XB_F0AFMIt is the exact same thing. A full shoe-tree made of cedar wood, elongable, with a handle to easily take it off.The second one costs six (6) times more than the other. Do you actually believe Church's is charging you that much because of an intrisic value of the item and not because of their name?
>>18353159DW5000R. The GW5000U looks ugly to me. No color and the solar panel frame around the dial shines reflecting the light, which is something that does not befit a G-Shock imo.
>>18353159Personally, I would take the DW-5000. That's the full-on classic G-Shock that people have been clamoring for for years.MB6 and Bluetooth and solar and all that are features that I've found myself caring less and less about as time's gone on.
>>18353162Honestly it's so much better to just change a battery when your G-Shock dies instead of worrying and hoping for a sunny day as soon as the power level hits 'medium'.
>>18353165For me it was more getting irrationally frustrated when my MB6 watch would go a couple days without syncing.
>>18352580tldr citizen eco drive. to not be mogged u have to have be doing well in ur life and fell good about urself and ur purchase. if u don't feel ur successful there's no point and shouldn't overspend on watches which are useless junk for the most part.
>>18353161>>18353162>>18353165>>18353169Thanks for the answers. For now, DW5000R seems to be the best for me.>>18353162>MB6 and Bluetooth and solar and all that are features that I've found myself caring less and less about as time's gone on.I suspect this will happen to me as well, and the simplicity of the DW5000R should make it more resistant and durable, because as far as I understand, solar panels have to be changed from time to time.
>>18352996But if Rolex wasn't actually that good or there wasn't a lot of work behind them don't you think people would just stop buying them?Rolex is objectively a higher end product than Timex. Their finishing is better because people spend much more time on the finishing, they make their own movements and spend a shitload of time and money testing, regulating, and then regulating again for every individual movement. The Daytona movement in particular is a marvel, the watch is smaller and thinner than some automatic chronographs double or triple the price and it's still readable. They stand by the watches having better longevity in warranties. And they have to do all these things because if Rolex actually sold watches with the same quality as Timex people literally just wouldn't pay what they're charging, full stop. Rolex would go out of business. And they'd certainly would go out of business if they charged Timex prices for their current product because they simply spend way too much time and money at every stage of production.
>>18353012it was a gift. i can imagine myself regretting it if i bought it at full price plus tax raping me in all holes. i like how it looks and the accuracy of the movement. really the only thing holding it back is if you like the design or not. the 41mm is kinda thick at 13.2mm, with the newer "shades" 38mm at 12.3mm of thickness
>>18353219The comparison is not between Rolex and Timex, obviously.
I hate how anything on social media related to watches is always about "muh wealth" or "muh luxury"I like one post of a Submariner and now my whole feed is celebrities with their retarded tacky jeweled Daytonas and ugly Royal OaksNigga, I just like the look of cool watches. I don't give a shit about celebrities or any of that stuff
>>18353239I feel you.
>>18353243Now I'm getting old money larp garbage. All because I liked a cool post of a SubI absolutely fucking LOATHE anything algorithmic
>>18353245Instagram is a wasteland of idiocy and fakeness. Delete your account, get out of that.
>>18353239>I hate how anything on social media related to watches is always about "muh wealth" or "muh luxury"I think that might be what passes for entertainment these days. Zoomers know they'll never be able to get rich, so they get the next best thing: carefully curated pictures from people who appear to be rich.(And then watching a bunch of videos about how that Lambo is rented, the Patek is fake, everything else was purchased on credit, and the poster lives in a 500 sq.ft. apartment with two other people.)
>>18353104>Look at barbour. They were clothing for farmers then the technology they used became obsolete and they rebranded themselves as a luxury goodBarbour currently makes mall-tier dogshit with plastic in it. The prices they ask are the umpteenth proof that no, you do not get what you pay for.
>lost 10lbs of fat>not in between link sizes of my watch anymore
>>18352881It’s not for everyone and it’s definitely subtle, but for me it works for almost everything. The more casual strap is definitely growing on me.
>>18352434Tissot seastar 1000, marathon or citizen ecodrive
>>18353297Is that strap real leather? Looks really cheap.
>>18352434Squale Super Squale is 38mm but feels more like a 36mm watch. Super nice and you can get it for 1000.
>>18352432Based and truthful.>>18352420Today I'm going with this Seiko my late grandpa found on the ground then gave to my dad, then Dad gave to me, I had to replace the movement in it but I think it's pretty neat. I don't usually do gold.
>>18353366LOVE that Seiko. I'm not a seikofag (I don't want to be mistaken for them) but that is absolutely great.
>>18353237The argument isn't about those specific brands either, it's just an analogy. Do you know how an analogy works? You could compare any budget brand watch company with any high end watch company and the argument and point is the same. We can do casio and patek if you want to, we can do islander and sinn, whatever you like, the high end companies still use higher end materials and do more meticulous handling with each individual piece.If you don't believe a gold patek is appreciably better for your use than a gshock to justify the added cost that's fine. But everyone doing that extra finishing and calibrating needs to be paid somehow. Their work was real even ifyou don't personally appreciate it in the end product. The people that do will pay them.
>>18353366>team TOYOTAFuck I need this
>>18353387Are you braindead retarded, bruh?If I tell you that the comparison is not between Rolex and Timex I am quite clearly telling you that the comparison should not be made between a luxury brand and a cheap brand, because anything that can be said about that is plain fucking obvious and you're wasting your words. I am telling you to compare Rolex to Zenith, Rolex to Omega, Rolex to Bucherer. But don't spend much time on it. Rolex is the result of meme advertisement and mythomania. Little else.
>>18353395I think you're the retard BRUH.>the topic is the relative prices of expensive goods compared to cheap goods>"NOOOO YOU CAN'T COMPARE AN EXPENSIVE BRAND WITH A CHEAP BRAND!"That's literally what we're talking about, dipshit. We're talking about why imported artesinal tools are more expensive than Harbor Freight tools. It's not just the name.
>>18353162I like these ones but I would like the heartrate/pedometer functions with bluetooth.
>>18353165I have a full spectrum uv/infrared reptile bulb in a lamp for my cats to get UV light for their health. I pop watches under it all the time for lume test already.
>>18353388I would take a team subaru wrx one with a matching vape please
>>18353407Or, moreover, why clone watches cost a tenth of the price of genuine watches. 99% of people will believe they look the same and they're close enough in quality, but they still didn't put the same labor and development into the product.
>>18353407It's 10% better and 90% a brand name status symbol for the husbands of women with coach written all over their purses
>>18353416Again, no. It's not. Like, objectively, it isn't. The chinese clone factories aren't spending weeks lab testing and tuning watch movements. It's not happening.>but I don't care about thatWho gives a fuck if you care? It still costs money to do that.
>>18353428Eta and sellita already give certifications on their movements. The chinese put sellitas in the nice clones. But we're talking percentages. Is getting a movement from the factory at 1s/day better time worth 3,250% more money?
Why does this same>waaaah! why do the luxury watches I want cost so muchargument come up over and over again?
>>18353431Because they're bad value and an objectively obsolete product. Radio perfect time is already out. Ultrahigh oscillation quartz exists. Ultrathin ecodrives exist. They literally had to start marketing as just a status symbol because as a tool it's over and it's been over.
>>18353435and? so it's a status symbol. big deal. whining that your timex isn't a status symbol despite also telling the time is not really productive.
>>18353437So buy whatever you want. But the values are almost certainly going to drop off with the deaths of the boomers. Unless indians, arabs, chinese can keep the prices up
>>18353440I'm ok with that. 99% don't buy these things as investments anyway.
>>18353443Most people do actually convince themselves it's at least only a very small loss if they resell and that it is a store of value rather than a true depreciating asset like a car.
>>18353375>>18353388It's awesome isn't it? It's not my absolute favorite style and it's just a quartz movement, but I like cars and drive a Toyota so it's perfect. I haven't found much about it as far as when or where it originated from. Our best guess is some sort of corporate gift or something.
>>18353445proof?
>>18353457Just look in these threads. It's said all the time. But I think these will go the way of harley davidson with the boomers.
>>18353458I would venture to say the few dozen people who regularly post here are not 99% of Rolex owners. There's maybe a small handful of people ITT who have ever held a Rolex, let alone owned one.>But I think these will go the way of harley davidson with the boomers.You know what? That's great. Then maybe the Sub or Datejust or whatever you want will come down into what you consider a reasonable price. Win-win.
>>18353460I don't like rolex designs besides the gmt. I like racing chronographs like the intramatic and top time
>>18353430I don't know, is it?
>>18353458Oh no, it would be a shame if luxury watches were... Really successful and popular household names that everyone recognizes?
>>18353476The point is that young people are not interested in harley davidson. In general they are not interested in watches and just have iwatch or samsung watches. Even if they do get into them they are more interested in microbrands like kuoe or baltic these days.
>>18353482>Even if they do get into them they are more interested in microbrands like kuoe or baltic these days.This seems like an incredible reach.You ask a young person what they want and they'll say "Rolex, Cartier, Patek, or AP" because that's what they see on social media.The people who want microshitters are those middle-aged, middle class guys who spend way too much time on watch forums and want to buy something despite not being able to buy the Rolex that they really want.
>>18352420If I have a Rolex, a Patek, and a G-Shock I'm basically all set, right? Am I missing anything?
>>18353487Idk I don't have any social media so I couldn't say who they're advertising to. I guess rappers would be doing this.
Is this Mudman secretly discontinued? It's out of stock on Casio and Amazon and the only eBay sellers who have it are all overseas.
>>18353366bro, the Team Toyota makes the watch
>>18353408is it accurate?
>>18353320It is cheap, $65 hirsch
Does anyone know this exact reference of Navitimer? I like the 12, 6, 9 layout and I'm sure they're not that expensive
>>18353366>TEAM TOYOTA Bros.... I think I need this
>>18353482Young people who are interested in motorcycles are interested in harley davidson.
>>18353482In my experience young people ARE interested in watches but can't afford them I wear an IWC and my zoomer coworker was really interested in it I had good conversations with him about watches
>>18353612That really is the biggest thing, especially when you're talking to people who had a lot of student loans or they fucked around and their loans are in force. Even of they make pretty good money they may just not be in a position to buy a high end watch. I've talked with my cousin about "affordable" watches, he's in a bit of a situation like that and even with $300 watches he says "if i bought that it would be the third most expensive thing I own only behind my car and my handgun." He's a thrifty money saving value seeking motherfucker.
>>18353612Watches and the Premier LeagueMy secret strategy for career maxxingI feel like men have a subconscious interest in one or both of these things. It makes small talk very easy.I avoid women at work. I learned from past mistakes.
With 2024 over, what was the most hated or polarizing release of the past year? I think pic related is a strong contender
>>18353119No no not out of imagination, I'll send you pics of course and a cartoon version of it or something. How much would you charge?
May I post my watch here, or is that only for /wt/?
>>18353711>actually discuss watches, free of avatarfagging drama>hurrrr let me post my watch durrr>>18353590
I like this. I want this.
>>18353721I was thinking if someone asks, or the topic is about that particular watch. But yeah, people still poss their wrist shots here. kek
>>18353711Personally I don’t mind people posting their watches, just don’t spam every goddamn thread with the same pictures/pastas.
>>18353721What drama? Another headcanon?
>>18353727luv sinn luv tegimented steel
>>18353764You okay if I post my watch here?
>>18353819If it's relevant to the discussion. For example, if you have a Sinn U1 or U50 this anon >>18353727 might benefit from your ownership experience.If you just want to post your own watch, apropos of nothing, that's really just frenposting and is better left in /wt/. It's encouraged there.The two threads actually work pretty well in parallel.
>>18353548>Does anyone know this exact reference of Navitimer? I like the 12, 6, 9 layout and I'm sure they're not that expensiveIt's the Breitling A13322.
Is there a spreadsheet of watches clones? I want to something that looks like omega or rolex but I don't want to spend that much and would rather not get a replica
>>18353829Tudor.
>>18353829loser mentality
>>18353819as long as there’s no kofe
>>18353829Disgusting
>>18353711As long as you don't use it to announce you're in the thread or as an excuse to talk about your breakfast or blog about what you're doing today like an avatarfag piece of shit, sure.
>>18353721>>18353733>>18353764I'm >>18353366I didnt realize there was two separate threads. I don't frequent /fa/ but I do occasionally hit watch threads when they're up. sometimes they're on /g/. I just wanted to show a pic of my watch and see what other anons are looking at. I didn't realize there was a whole thing.
>>18353952Just ignore the drama. We enjoy watches. It's just one guy obsessing since 2023
>>18353160The fuck is a shoe tree retard are you a fucking leprechaun or some shit lmfao?
>>18353829>want a clone but not a replicaJust search "Rolex whatever homage"
>>18353963Well, that's why we had to split. I think 99% of us have been happier this way. /wt/ is still having fun. We're talking about watches. It's great.
>>18353971It's amazing to me that it works. I agree, it's better that way.
>>18353975Better until illiterate mortadello posts in the wrong thread
rolex look ugly
>>18353829San martin makes the bestPagani, steeldive, and addiesdive make the cheapestBaltany makes a great middle tier product without the ugly san martin logo
>>18353986>rent free
>>18354079It's in recent memory because he did it last week lol.
I love the legibility and design. The bracelet is solid with microadjust, I just wish the bezel was a little wider but it's great. It is really accurate so far. And it's cheap enough for a daily that I don't care really.
Should I pick up an Aqua Terra or a Santos? Looking to grab another piece to go with my Explorer 1 and those two both seem nice.
>>18353986We got a new 'tadello???
The coolest people I see depicted on the internet do not wear Rolex or luxury brands. Rolexfags will cope, but truth be told, the people who just do-not-care and wear vintage watches or obscure stuff always make a stronger impression on me. They just look more interesting, and that's the point of it all. The point of fashion itself.
I love chronographs so much bros
>>18354272Shut up and buy the rolex and the porche 911 and the PXGs
>>18354281YOU VIL BUY DAS ROLEX AND YOU VIL BE HAPY
fuck off with your shitters poorfag cunts
>>18354280Which ones? Comparing a Daytona to a vintage Gallet is like comparing pineapple to grapes
>>18354284>>18354286It smells like shit in here, pajeet, can you please leave our room?
>dis poorfag bugman trying to call out othersallow me to lmfao.LMFAO
>>18354290Calling out others without quoting them is peak bugman behavior
>>18354287Daytonas are fatasses that look like they want to take a dip back in the pool and eat nachos at a swim up bar. Obviously the quintessential chrono is the speedmaster.
Reminder that the low-effort lowercase shitposter is not white and has never once posted his watch despite being on 4chan 24/7
>>18354293Zenith gets a shoutout too
>>18354140>Have your gf fuck your Rolex AD twiceFuck this cuck
Had to suck off my AD just to get him to let me take me out to lunch to ask him if I can get on the waiting list for one of these.
>>18354438The way the numbers rotate on an interior arc but are level on the 12/3/6/9 causes me physical discomfort
>>18354254>Looking to grab another piece to go with my Explorer 1 and those two both seem nice.Neither. They would both be redundant with an Explorer 1 in your collection.
>>18354318only chrono I've salivated over. I'll save up for one some day
Watch experts what do you think of this card? Real or fake?
>>18354493I like the ones with the interior tachometer. I don't really like the exterior bezels on an angle because then it just looks and works too much like a dive watch. The speedy gets away with it by making it flat and extremely thin. The minute hand is supposed to measure your speed over a fixed distance with the tachometer. Even these ones do the 10th of a second instead of the tachometer sometimes though, but it still has the interior bezel for it. A chrono should say racing car to me and the angled exterior bezel just is too large on the entirety of daytona style chronos.
Flat sapphire vs domed sapphire?
>>18354618kys
>>18354507I prefer chronos without any tachometer scale. They're so incredibly niche in their use, they just clutter up the dial (or bezel). There's so little space on a chrono's dial to begin with.
>>18352436Pelagos mogs black beta tbqh
>>18354665You don't have to bother. That anon is a retard who keeps spamming the BB54.That said, though, you're right. The Pelagos is by far the better line of watches from Tudor.
Your watch can't rewind the VHS deck? Sad.
>>18354502Rolex puts chips in their cards for identification and I don't think fakes replicate that yet so you can always tell if it's a real card by the imprint of the chip in the surface of the card
>>18354671Chip only goes to the Datejust website, it’s not even mine but a fluted model. At the store the seller was able to go to another page where it shows the date sold and register me as the owner. I can’t seem to get to that page on my own. I am guessing that’s the AD login.
>>18354669I need one of these to control all my retro gaming shit. Imagine if you will, you take a girl to your tendie cave, where you have the last 30 years of gaming set up on various eras of CRT television, and you just control everything from your wrist like some power glove shit. Then you bring out the VHS player and put in an official copy of Pokemon Psychic Surprise and break out the fruit by the foot. I don't think any reasonable woman could possibly resist, and if they did, I don't think I would want their involvement.How much for this exquisite timepiece my good sir? Perhaps one of the greatest tool watch functions ever devised. No I am not kidding.
>>18354688Yours for £39.95 If you have a portal to 1998
>>18354691Technology was so optimistic back then. We didn't understand.
I have this field watch under the radar, is great value for money, it has a couple of colours to choose from and i in doubt:white:https://www.creationwatches.com/products/ratio-watches-431/ratio-quest-mens-field-watch-sapphire-canvas-strap-quartz-rtq027-100m-lewis-and-clark-edition-27057.htmlblack:https://www.creationwatches.com/products/ratio-watches-431/ratio-quest-mens-field-watch-sapphire-canvas-strap-quartz-rtq023-100m-lewis-and-clark-edition-27055.htmllight green:https://www.creationwatches.com/products/ratio-watches-431/ratio-quest-mens-field-watch-sapphire-canvas-strap-quartz-rtq021-100m-lewis-and-clark-edition-27054.htmldark green:https://www.creationwatches.com/products/ratio-watches-431/ratio-quest-mens-field-watch-sapphire-canvas-strap-khaki-green-dial-quartz-rtq029-100m-lewis-and-clark-edition-28202.htmli plan to buy more straps so I think the white one would be the most versatile, what do you think?
>>18354712Black looks better. White looks like a watch for people with impaired eyesight.
>>18354716wouldnt it be easier to match? It would go well with a gray, blue or black strap. not the same watch but to get an idea:https://youtube.com/watch?v=7me41vUnkeQjump to 6:50 and 9:00
i looked at some luxury watches irl today and they all look way more small and flimsy than on the internet. why is that?
>>18354746A luxury watch will be really well finished, which gives it a look of weight and solidity in pictures. The pics will also be closeups, which disguise the actual size of the watch. In person, that luxury watch will also be thin, which gives the impression of flimsiness.
>>18354254I'd go with the Santos. Unless there's a specific AT that really speaks to you.
>>18354746What specific watches are we talking about?
>>18354819sinn, nomos, longines, the list goes on...
I'm gonna buy a rep and none of you can stop me
A watch I inherited from my great grandfather. How much do you guys think it's worth? Zero plans to sell, all my watches have sentimental value to me.
>>18354828You can buff out those scratches.
>>18354712Get the addiesdive off ali express. It's $54 right now and it has sapphire and an nh34a inside. Automatic not quartz. It looks much much better than that.
>>18354828~$150. Get those scratches polished out.
Making a killing selling fake rolexes and omegas online as used pieces. Shit is too easy. Had to give back the money like twice because only two people found out the watches are fake
>>18354859Based
>>18354859I've pawned 2 chink Explorers off as real.
>>18354859Don't you get raped in the ass legally for this though?
>>18354843>>18354850Noted, thank you. I'm having trouble identifying anything and all the tools are for modern models. The watch was from the 80s I believe. Can anyone help me out? Between the 6 and 7 o'clock mark there's the code "P-6650 6-926291 SMO"I'm not sure where the watch was bought, but apparently it was a western country.
>>18354870Nobody cares in practice. If you give the money back quickly and apologize you even get positive evaluations because of "good customer service" kek
>>18354859Where do you find fakes good enough and/or retards stupid enough for this to work?
>>18354888That's fucking insanity
nigga, what the fuck is a field watch?
>>18354859Yes but do you believe in God? Some do, even if they don't partake in religious activities. And that prevents them from flipping watches.
>>18354907A watch based on watches worn by troops on the ground during wars of the 20th century. As opposed to Fliegers for example which are based on watches worn by combat pilots.
>>18354911Watches based on watches worn by troops on the ground during wars of the 20th century are based.
>>18354924Wait until you find out all good mens clothing was based on a function and job men used to do. Then when you see hybrids and incongruence and purposeless inaccuracy it disgusts you.
>>18354928>purposeless inaccuracyyou just described essentially the entire women's clothing market.
>>18354889The average person doesn't care. You can weed out the knowledgeable ones by not selling to those that ask questions. People just want to be a brand display.Rolexes and omegas are priced and known at the perfect range for this to work. More expensive watches attract too many enthusiasts and cheaper watches need too much turnover to make decent cash.
>>18354272It's true to some extent. The watch shouldn't be more interesting than the man. You need a lot of personality to pull off a gold Rolex, and 99% of the people wearing them don't have it.Also, people who baby their watches are cucks by default. If someone buys an exepensive watch, he should be ready to get it fucked by having fun on a saturday night.
>>18354911Watches based on watches worn by combat pilots are also based.
>>18354928Good mens clothing that was based on a function and job men used to do is also based.
>>18354943My wrist is too round and it wouldn't suit me personally. But yes.
>>18354934>>18354859I thought you were bullshitting about people actually buying this shit, then I found this. 8 fucking bids on this embarassingly bad fake currently sitting at £620. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/296919368477
>>18354846you're actually right;https://a.aliexpress.com/_mN6uZMJlooks nice, black or white one?
Still really enjoying this one
>>18355011you're so pale that I thought you were golfing
>watch looks too big when I look down at my wrist>looks perfectly fine in a mirrorexplain this black magic
>>18354911>>18354924>>18354943Watches based on watches are not based.>>18354928Literally this.
>>18355013>watch is 35mm but looks bigger than a 39mm oneexplain THIS black magic
>>18355017bezel fuckery
>>18355012Yeah I’m actually white
>>18355013Basically pic related.Your eye works the same as a camera lens. The closer you get to an object, the bigger the object appears.
>>18355036Do I trust my eyes or the mirror
>>18355020you're sickly, get some sunlight casper
>>18355001Black, note that the leather strap one is sand blasted (flat polish) and the steel bracelet is properly polished and shiny. Choose either but buy a better leather strap.
>>18355051Trust God's eye.
Forgot to crop that (ali uses .av1 file types)Also these rubber straps are fucking great on divers, chronos, etc. A black one is great if you don't want to spend a lot on a strap.https://www.aliexpress.us/item/3256806290675943.html?spm=a2g0n.order_detail.order_detail_item.3.3262f19cuHO0lV&_gl=1*1q5hmiv*_gcl_aw*R0NMLjE3MzU5NDIxNDMuQ2owS0NRaUFzdDY3QmhDRUFSSXNBS0tkV09tSWVFWFp6dlVtV2NvOU5fTG5zdk5SUXpVdDRxZHdWcmRLUDZDVHBCekxVUkxUV2NYczFhc2FBbXA2RUFMd193Y0I.*_gcl_dc*R0NMLjE3MzU2NjYzNTcuQ2owS0NRaUF5YzY3QmhEU0FSSXNBTTk1UXp1RHdJenZzb3VXcXNLT0tYMTZUY1kyR2xKZEZrZlVoTzR2alFGajFJbjRGVXRDTkxKcGZfNGFBdnllRUFMd193Y0I.*_gcl_au*MjA4MTUyNzMzOS4xNzM0MTE0OTgx*_ga*MTU4NjM0MTgwMDA5MjI3LjE3MzQxMTQ5NjY0NDk.*_ga_VED1YSGNC7*MTczNTk0MjEzOC41OS4xLjE3MzU5NDIxNDcuNTEuMC4w&gatewayAdapt=glo2usa
poorfag shitter wearer
vomit inducing shitters
>>18355100https://a.aliexpress.com/_mLXwq9HI love this store and the cut to length straps. Leather sure you get what you pay for usually but fkm rubber you can get the same chinese shit you pay 5x the price for direct from the chinese.
Constant seether who can't post anything but a beat to shit breitling
>>18354930Womens clothing is essentially all just costumes with costume tier quality and no functionality in mind.
>>18354665their snowflake hour hand just goes better with square indices
>>18355116>>18355117horny swissy slut
>>18355137Got a new watch this week, so far I am really liking it
>>18355137Idk what it is about the indices since they are applied indices, but the way they are inset makes them look like painted indices which makes it look like a cheap shitter. Circular indices don't look as cheap and the candy bar indices don't either, but I may just be autistic. (yes it looks cheap when omega does it with the speedmaster too)
>>18355153>shitter microbrand costing almost as much as better Swiss offerings and too much to compete with cheaper offerings either.Wtf
>>18355155Yeah the price was a little higher than I would have wanted, but I’m still happy with the watch. it’s gonna be my daily for the foreseeable future so I will get plenty of use out of it
New thread>>18355162New thread>>18355162New thread>>18355162
>>18355158Yeah not an awful watch by any means just way better values almost everywhere else.
>>18355164Better than buying a prx like fucking literally everyone else
>>18355020Are you also a young slightly overweight woman?
>>18355233Those knuckles aren't young but it is fucking weird that he has no hand hair. Unless he wears work gloves constantly and rubs it all off.
