Why are tiny laptops so unpopular compared to smartphones?
>>107623859although, to be honest, there does seem to be an option for 900 dollars - still too much but i would just let it pass. its too expensive i would not consider it, but if you have the money, it is a good deal i guess.
>>107622749>no touchpadsChinks aren't even trying to step to the Eck. LMAO.>BUT TOUCH SCR--Imagine smearing your display instead of using glorious trackpads for the function. LMAO. Chinks can't even.
>>107623407GPD has been around longer than the Deck and STILL can't resolve the notorious thermal issues it's had for a decade plus two years now.It's a meme device for people with more money than sense until they resolve that.
>>107623880actually the one for 900 dollars is no longer available... what the fuck? the cheapest option you can actually buy is 983 dollars. This is just a meme. just buy a Steam Deck. 569 euro vs 983 dollars - yea right
>>107623897the way i see it, if they reduce all of their prices by 50% the product is actually good for the price. but man, this alone means that the current price is 100% higher than it should be.
Recounting the threads edition/gedg/ Wiki: https://igwiki.lyci.de/wiki//gedg/_-_Game_and_Engine_Dev_GeneralIRC: irc.rizon.net #/g/gedgProgress Day: https://rentry.org/gedg-jams/gedg/ Compendium: https://rentry.org/gedg/agdg/: >>>/vg/agdgGraphics Debugger: https://renderdoc.org/Requesting Help-Problem Description: Clearly explain your issue, providing context and relevant background information.-Relevant Code or Content: If applicable, include relevant code, configuration, or content related to your question. Use code tags.Previous: https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/107546157/#107546157
>>107623717You're a retard who doesn't think about things hard enough
>>107623756You're right, I don't think about things hard because there's usually no need. If you need to think very hard, you probably created a mess of systems and abstractions that make everything a hundred times harder than it needs to be. Software development, and especially game development, is not about who can stack the most layers and make the most contrived, unmaintainable mess.
>>107623773Complicated problems need to be thought about hardIf you aren't solving complicated problems then what you have to say is of no value
>>107623814Complicated problems exist, but 90% of problems people call complicated are not complicated, they are made complicated by them.
>>107623900Games are full of complicated problems and pretending they aren't doesn't make you smart
2 more weeks until web browsers are SAVED
>>107620829https://youtu.be/vMXQLHBKtLASounds like you need to watch this fren.
>>107622134So what geometry is the google chrome logo? Have any other ontological fallacies?Don't market your products with religious symbols and then gaslight everyone into thinking it's not a religious symbol.
>>107622146Crowley was so based because of his skin color, bro. We should eat our own cum for magick powers to own the libs, bro.
>>107620743>lissajous curve logosure its cool but it's also incredibly bland and generic. I saw another tech company with a lissajous logo tooI'd prefer an actual ladybird
>>107623885What's the mathematical name for the 666 chrome logo?
Is there a safer embedded programming language than Rust?
>>107621480yeap its very immature atm
An embedded language that is absurdly difficult to implement a linked list in?
>>107622695>absurdly difficultSkill issue
>>107622801tell that to retards who caused a CVE while using Rust to implement a linked list lmao
>>107618589>If your shit can't build on the device it's running on then it's worthless.I guess your motherboard is worthless then.
>>107622984Completely irrelevant to my post.
>>107622919>troonix doesn't support hdr at allgood morning winjeet
>>107622967I mean it's kind of cucked. You have to use KDE on wayland. And then for each game that supports it, you have to add an additional startup command and use a specific proton fork or it won't just detect shit.
>>107623743
>>107623856The point is on windows I don't have to do this, the display server isn't half broken
/aicg/ - A general dedicated to the discussion and development of AI chatbotsMakima Edition>NewsGoogle releases Gemini 3 Flash https://blog.google/products/gemini/gemini-3-flash/OpenAI releases GPT-5.2 https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-2Deepseek releases V3.2 https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V3.2Anthropic releases Opus 4.5 https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-opus-4-5Google releases Gemini 3 Pro https://blog.google/products/gemini/gemini-3/#gemini-3Additional info: https://aicg.neocities.org/info.html>FrontendsSillyTavern: https://docs.sillytavern.appComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I like how horns are literally just bone, but all models act like it's the most erogenous zone ever if I grab it
>>107623788coomers poisoned the dataset
>>107623776Eh,,
>>107623769The CIA was founded in 1947... (((Coincidence)))? I think not!
>>107623325who?
In 10 days on January 1st, the Texas Law [SB2420] that requires an ID to download ANY apps onto your phone using the App/Play Stores, goes into effect.How do we bypass this, is it just over, should we all just switch to dumbPhones soon???...I know that theres F-Droid, and you can use the Aurora Store to bypass this (maybe), but some apps refuse to work unless you download them from the Play Store now, and I heard that sideloading will be disabled in 1-2 years, so it seems like its over.>tl;drOnce this law goes into effect, users located in Texas who download an app on the App/Play Stores, will be required to confirm whether they are 18 years or older, by showing their ID.
>>107614681non-free software niggers btfo
>>107614681Land of the free amirite?How will amerilards ever recover from this?
>>107614681is gentoo portage covered by this?lmaowhats up with texas? why are they going authoritaritarded?
>>107614681America has the bbigest cars, biggeest burger,s biggest people, biggest shartmarts, and biggest freedom. Freedom got so big you can't even see it.
>>107617425Jews, just call them by the name.
sleepy witch edition>Not sure what private trackers are all about?A private tracker is an invite-only torrent website. Each member shares common goals: collecting, preserving and discussing media.>Have a question?- FAQ https://archive.is/UVQkn- WIKI https://igwiki.lyci.de/wiki/Private_trackers- NEWFAG PYRAMID https://inviteroute.github.io/graph or https://inviteroute.github.io/sheet/- STUDY https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/2F379FE0CB50DF502F0075119FD3E060- SPREADSHEET https://hdvinnie.github.io/Private-Trackers-Spreadsheet/- TEN CURRY COMMANDMENTS https://pastebin.com/raw/dBbdE73M - TEN NEON COMMANDMENTS https://pastebin.com/raw/Ud2pGYaE - RED SPAMMER'S BIBLE https://rentry.org/69zbxh4h- #ptg is on irc.sageru.org but it's pretty deadComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>107622549I will ban them instead, they can join HDBangladesh
i poop in the street and download capeshit exclusivelly from hdbangladesh saars
Isn't PTP a completely useless tracker? If you're "good" enough to join it, why would you, in the first place? You can get like 98% remuxes on Torrentleech, and the remaining 2% you'll find on trackers that you'll need to upload your way up to PTP. And then, you're on PTP, and what's in there for you? I'm new to trackers, don't really understand that. Got like 1800+ movies/series as remuxes, mostly from Framestor, that's available on TL which is easy to get to. Even some obscure movies or series. What would I find on PTP that I wouldn't on TL?
This thread has been completely overrun with retarded neons
>>107623094It shouldn't be up to anybody to decide what nobody is interested in thougheverbeit.
Neat and tidy editionPrevious: >>107558411 #>Keyboard recommendation template:https://pastebin.com/n220xk9V>Find vendorshttps://www.alexotos.com/keyboard-vendor-list // Up-to-date list of reputable vendors with brief descriptionshttps://keycaplendar.firebaseapp.com // Tracker for current and upcoming keycap group buys>This keyboard stuff is so expensive!https://aliexpress.com (or Taobao if you know how)>Learn about MX-type switches ("mechanical keyboard switches")Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>107622314Get GMK caps.
>>107623209It's worth the extortion.
>>107623543I paid close to the same total amount for my kailh silent browns nearly 4 years ago. Better be worth.
The Geon tranny kinda grew on me
MX Blaecks
Workers of the tech world, unite! - edition>Manifestohttps://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/61/pg61.txt>Tech News & Industry InsightsThe Register - https://www.theregister.com/TechCrunch - https://techcrunch.com/Hacker News - https://news.ycombinator.com/Fudzilla - https://fudzilla.com/newsZDNet - https://www.zdnet.com>Software Development & ProgrammingGitHub Trending - https://github.com/trendingDevDocs - https://devdocs.ioComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>107617099I make 66k in ID but I work for gov and it was my first job so yeah they were being cheeky boomers. Can't wait to fuck off and make double once Im done raking in all the XP
>>107617050Tech workers need to unionise.Drew segfault got something right
>>107623264If its a honey trap, get your dick wet, and when the blackmail comes in, just report it. It does not matter if she has files of you getting pegged or not, long as its reported fast you're ok.If not honey trap, get your dick wet.
Why is tech full of twinks, femboys, transwomen and specifically submissive gay men?
>>107623264proceed with RAPE
So what's the deal with everyone hating on Rust? The usual points people bring up are: >wokism >tranny language >made by jews >it's a cult Disregarding the aforementioned points, can you tell me actual reasons for why a safe(r) programming language like Rust shouldn't be adopted more widely?
>>107623542>There were computers that couldn't run C. Like what? Other than meme lisp machines.>"C11/C++11" added atomics because x86 had them.x86 does not have any instructions for acquire or release because all instructions have those by default. Those got added to C and C++ because of other architectures.>ARM copied the instructions from x86 to make it easier to support programs designed for x86.lmao no, aarch64's initial atomics had basically nothing in common with x86. Arm is weakly ordered so they had to add a bunch of instructions for acquire/release orderings, and since read-modify-write wasn't "RISC", they didn't copy any of those over from x86 until armv8.1-a when they realized not having them was a mistake.
>>107623348memory leak because of nodes referencing each other> OOM is not a memory issue!
>>107618040you can't do X in Rust> because you don't need X!
>>107623819>Like what? Other than meme lisp machines.Computers designed for COBOL for example, and computers with descriptors where "array decay" isn't allowed. All of these innovations are better for regular high-level languages, but are bad for C because C is PDP-11 assembler that thinks it's a high-level language.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burroughs_Medium_Systems>They operated directly on COBOL-68's primary decimal data types: strings of up to 100 digits, with one EBCDIC or ASCII digit character or two 4-bit binary-coded decimal BCD digits per byte. Portable COBOL programs did not use binary integers at all, so the B2500 did not either, not even for memory addresses. Memory was addressed down to the 4-bit digit in big-endian style, using 5-digit decimal addresses. Floating point numbers also used base 10 rather than some binary base, and had up to 100 mantissa digits. A typical COBOL statement 'ADD A, B GIVING C' may use operands of different lengths, different digit representations, and different sign representations. This statement compiled into a single 12-byte instruction with 3 memory operands. [2] Complex formatting for printing was accomplished by executing a single EDIT instruction with detailed format descriptors. Other high level instructions implemented "translate this buffer through this (e.g. EBCDIC to ASCII) conversion table into that buffer" and "sort this table using these sort requirements into that table".
>>107614701GC is faster than RC which trannies must use for any non-trivial applications.
>there are people who still use BIOS over UEFI and turn off secure boot in the year 2025 on this boardWhat the fuck is your problem?UEFI/GPT has been the standard for a decade. UEFI supports larger drives, boots faster because UEFI runs in 32/64-bit mode rather than 16-bit mode, handles initializing multiple hardware devices during boot better than BIOS/MBR, and supports modern hardware better than BIOS/MBR in general. Unless you have an ancient computer, it is almost certainly UEFI/GPT OTB. I can't think of a reason to use BIOS/MBR if your computer supports UEFI/GPT.
>>107623647And there isn't with pre-2012? Remember Meltdown/SPECTRE?If you think your shit hasn't been pwned for ages now, you're in for a rude awakening.
>>107622470I never activated secure boot because the MB manual didn't explain it and the uefi menus were confusing.
>>107623696it protects boot files from being tampered and more if you do UKIs. you have to set up your system in a way for it to be meaningful though because in an average distro there are lots of place for malware persistance
>>107623802Don't run malware as root and it's not a problem./thread
>>107623832>Don't run malware as root and it's not a problemthat's not how it works
What are you maids working on?Last thread: >>107542891
>>107622375do you really want your code blacked? just use ruff
>>107622615>>107622629yeah I have abandoned black for ruff since ruff is way more configurablebut some projects (none of mine) insist on using blackblacks whole thing is to not be configurable for some reason
>>107611672>>107608896>>107621553Hey fellow advent of code anons. Enjoy day 10, it filtered me.I think most people imported their solution but I didn't want to do that, so I spent all day coding a solver. Didn't manage it in one day, though.Now I found some time and finally completed day 10.(the code image is too large, lol: https://files.catbox.moe/u996c1.png)
>>107575071data visualization with OpenSCAD for shits and giggles
>>107623344Also pinging (You)>>107575720>>107514291since (if I remember right) you were the only other zig anon and you may like seeing this. it runs in 10 ms (:
>What phone has X and Y feature?Don't ask, use these!https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3https://www.kimovil.com/en/compare-smartphoneshttps://phonedb.net/index.php?m=device&s=queryGood Resources:>Reviewshttps://www.gsmarena.comhttps://www.phonearena.comhttps://www.notebookcheck.net>Frequency Checkershttps://www.frequencycheck.comhttps://kimovil.com/en/frequency-checkerComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>107623594>the future has plastic screensthanks, I hate it
What the fuck is the point of these high resolution smartphone camera sensors and why does everyone use them? The digital zoom argument doesn't make sense as most if not all phones with high res main cameras also have telephoto cameras, and the ones that don't have telephoto cameras usually have hardware that's too weak to process all those pixels. Better image quality in daylight also doesn't make sense as these sensors aren't designed to output at full resolution and demosaicing algorithms vary wildly from OEM to OEM. Better image quality at night doesn't make sense either as you could get the exact same results with a traditional 12MP sensor that's something like 1/1.3" compared to a 50MP sensor of the same size without having to do any binning. Is it just bigger number better marketing?
>>107623594I just want book style foldables to come back
LG Wing is still my preferred design
>>107623738>Is it just bigger number better marketing?yep
>use 2FA>store second factor in the same password manager>it's now 1FA
>>107623524Blah I meant keepass distribution or whatever they're called, clients maybeIs there anything wrong with XC?
>>107623560>Is there anything wrong with XC?not especially, i'd just prefer to use the same vanilla flavour of Keepass that i've been using for the past two decades. i'm going to look into why this is happening, i'm just annoyed that it's happening.
>>107617314If you use 2FA for your password manager then it is still 2FA
>>107617977I would say yes because it makes it a lot harder to get into the account
>>107617977Yes because OTPs are safer from MITM attacks than passwords, and since OTP is standardized there's zero risk a website will store your OTPs in some laughably insecure way.
