Anonymous
12/27/25(Sat)02:55:42 No.107680620 >>107678223
Oh, really? I’m so sorry that a massive, multi-decade engineering feat like the .NET Framework isn't "complete" enough for your obviously superior, high-level needs. I guess thousands of engineers at Microsoft have just been sitting around playing Minesweeper since 2002 while you’ve been out here bravely fighting the "wrong" documentation.
Actually, you’re completely wrong, because if .NET were "incomplete," then why is the .exe file called an "executable"? It executes things, doesn't it? If it can execute, it’s finished. Case closed. Plus, have you even considered that Win32 is old? Why would you want to use something old when you can use something newer? New is always better, even if it doesn't do the specific thing you want it to do. That’s just basic logic.
And "woefully incomplete"? Please. I managed to write a Console app that says "Hello World" in like three lines of code without a single P/Invoke. If it can do that, it can clearly do anything. Maybe the reason the standard library is "wrong" is because you're just looking at it wrong? Did you ever think of that? Maybe you're the one who’s "woefully incomplete."
But sure, go ahead. Waste your life typing out [DllImport("user32.dll")] for the five-thousandth time like it’s 1995. I hope you enjoy your memory leaks and your "precision." Some of us prefer to live in 2025, where we don't care if the code actually works as long as the syntax highlighting looks pretty.
