also, I'm trans if that matters

>>107991711
>>Unable to process this search This search can't be processed due to content guidelines. Please try a different image or keywords
...?
I searched hanged wojaks, without being blocked, recently. What in the world were you trying to search?

>>107991711
what do i use instead? i just care about it working idc what company or site. would bing work best or Yandex or what?

>>107991711
Fuck you and fuck your soijack thread

Thinly veiled anti-Bharat thread, gtfo /pol/tard.

>>107993441
>Docker compose doesn't unless you install it in every container (retarded), or install it at the OS level, which defeats the purpose of the OS? Same thing with vscode. Install it via flatpak at the host level and have no access to your containers, or install it in every container (retarded).
Unironically a skill issue.

>>107993486
>There's 3 Bazzite installers
Hey ding dong, OP's image says Fedora Atomic, which Bazzite is based on, but doesn't mean just bazzite.

>>107993679
One of the main features of fedora atomic is to be able to rebase to a spin that has everything you need baked into it. Or create that spin yourself. You still need to do stuff to make your computer work the way you want it to. It's not magic. You don't just download an ISO that magically has a system set up specifically for your individual tastes and needs. You still might have to use your brain for a minute or two. VSCode has plugins for working with containers. Universal Blue spins have your drivers baked in. One command to install.

>>107993679
Why would you intentionally try to install a distro that doesn't support your hardware out of the box? This is almost as retarded as trying to install Windows x86 on an ARM device. If you're on nVidia you're supposed to install Bazzite or any of the other Atomic images which come with nVidia drivers.
Also, the fucking AI summary of Brave search literally guides you step by step on how to install the drivers properly without them conflicting with the default semi-functional ones.

I don't get what problem all these Atomic distros are trying to solve

File: trvthnvke.jpg (72 KB, 512x512)

72 KB JPG

>>107980181
Based

>>107992650
Rust has already shown to be less performant than its counterpart code in the kernel
And a chunk of its devs have already melted down and quit over being treated like the second class citizens they are.
https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/07/linus_torvalds_rust_driver/

This shit was a meme pushed by corporate backers and Linus caved because he has IBM and red hat's hand up his ass.

File: 1753634599972232.jpg (90 KB, 1070x1199)

90 KB JPG

>>107993558
once again,
>>>That will only lead to pain and thousands of bugs

>>107993524
>far less elegant
Show me your script that properly hooks up stdout to syslog, sets up cgroup limits for CPU and memory, can install seccomp filters on the processes in the cgroup, fs namespace directories so the application can't see anything it didn't or even basic shit like setting ambient capabilities.

You can't and you won't because you're a nocoder retard who doesn't know how Linux works.

>>107974955
Valve uses Arch, Gaben won't care.

>>107993450
A lot of this sometimes makes sense if you're calling C code.
Maybe the C code wants an int. Rust's i32 type only works if C ints are 32-bits on this platform. With the c_int alias your code also compiles on other platforms.
Turning the Box into a raw pointer allows a C library to keep using that memory without you keeping the Box alive somehow on the Rust side. You can hand the pointer off to the C code and forget about it. (If you do ever want to free that memory you have to find the pointer again and turn it back into a Box with Box::from_raw().)
Allocating uninitialized memory means you skip the cost of initializing it. Initializing a single int really isn't a big deal but if you e.g. have a big array it can be significant, it might have to write a hundred kilobytes of zeroes that you're going to overwrite shortly after. The memory does have to be written to before you first read from it though or else weird things can happen.
You might erase a pointer's type because you want to store it together with lots of other kinds of pointers and you have some way to figure out later what type it was supposed to be and cast it back to that. (You can also use the Any trait to remember the original type at runtime but that takes extra memory.)

On a hardware level all of this is easy, basically the default. (Except for the c_int thing, that's different.) But Rust pushes you to initialize heap memory immediately because that gives many nice guarantees and it's what you want 95% of the time anyway. And Rust automatically inserts code to deallocate so you can't forget to do it, or do it twice, or at the wrong time.
The hardware doesn't know about types or destructors. And it doesn't know the difference between initialization and other writes. C knows a little about these things but not as much as Rust.
Sometimes you want to talk to C or do very specific things on the hardware. Then you have to peel off all the nice features and write more code to do less.

>>107993414
>If you then want to convert it to a raw pointer so it doesn't get deallocated when it goes out of scope you write
for a rustic version, you can just Box::leak(), you don't need raw pointers for that.
for a C-style version, you can just do C-in-Rust as in >>107978139 ;)
oh, and you're conversing with /g/eet juniors being monkey trained in ancient wintard IDEs (>>107978891), who then wasted most of this thread trying to cover for that fact ;);)

>>107993778
>for a rustic version, you can just Box::leak(), you don't need raw pointers for that.
That permanently leaks it though, you can't soundly turn it back into a Box AFAIK. Presumably the C code would eventually call free().
>for a C-style version, you can just do C-in-Rust
That loses you interoperability with normal high-level Rust.
Obviously this code is contrived but it's the style I tend to use.

>>107993778
pretty sure you can Box::from_raw leaked boxes.

>>107978205
it works in windows 7 so that's a +1 for me
I'm still sticking to java tho

File: battlestation.jpg (2.4 MB, 3024x4032)

2.4 MB JPG

>>107991132
Behold my battlestation, it is the best of all the battlestations

>>107992836
>Investment
This was no more than $2000 tops, including the chair. I think that is perfectly fine for something you use every day for several hours.

File: super abortroid.jpg (2.7 MB, 4096x2304)

2.7 MB JPG

Made some renovations to my station, will post later.
>>107991181
This is either a 'ranny trying too hard to look girly or a genuine fem'non whose pussy grips too well for her abused bf to call the cops
>>107991672
>>107991682
>>107991686
Honestly the only things that bug me is that split keyboard and the fuckass Lawnmower Man lookin' mouse. Otherwise, solid setup.

>>107991181
Tranny core. How many cocks did you suck this weekend boyo?

>>107992862
>something you use every day for several hours.

typical rationalization phrase, but realistically this sets you up for nearly never ending justification on spending. There is all kinds of shit you use everyday

>>107989413
I would be satisfied if we just never shared it with the rest of the world and primarily kept it out of the hands of third worlders above all

>>107988993
this

>>107987721
>t.

>>107989413
And you will fail.
I think more people should have tried harder back in the day, but realistically it's inevitable to reach it , the *best* you can hope for is to push it back a decade or two.
The problem exists outside of the scope of the internet, it's at the human layer and you're not going to be able to easily absent that. It's only time before someone thinks: I can make money orfa that....

>>107991074
So, not an internet, an intranet.
Fuck off back to /pol where such lack of thought belongs.

>>107987153
>What do you tell people
You don't.
You show them.
You're only going back to 1984. You pull a phone out of your pocket you're not going to be burned for witchcraft....
Use that to demonstrate the pace of advance, then use it to demonstrate how little control the hand computer affords the user compared to a laptop.
Make sure they are very aware it's the average everyday joe on the street accepting it that made it possible.

>>107992267
I work helldesk for telcos and every iphone update breaks imap email and then I have to walk boomers through setting it back up. I would still say iphones and ipads and no computer is best for boomers and toddlers though.

>>107990667
>chink made niggercattle device for soulless chinese bugman breaks when exposed to freezing temperatures
No...

>>107990667
lcds gets damaged easily when frozen, this is not new

>>107990776
Now do one of hitler dressed as a nun milking a herd of cats....
Not had a good one o that yet...

>>107990667
Smartphones were a mistake

>>107992420
Navigation buttons are cancer

>>107993272
Still the best navigation mode.

>>107993339
This is not my opinion but of the market, your opinion is irrelevant

File: 20250602_132309.jpg (29 KB, 550x558)

29 KB JPG

>>107986700
It's a bed-using prevention feature of the phones that don't allow you to use the phone in bed at 45 degrees.

>>107991302
Where do I put this?

File: Yakub spotted.png (135 KB, 268x331)

135 KB PNG

>>107993539

post ai

>>107992871
>old
>used goods
>baggage (another mans children)
what is the appeal

File: Ai Mikami.png (139 KB, 400x300)

139 KB PNG

>>107993656
I gotcha senpai

>>107993725
I specifically said I'm not interested in a woman with kids. The older I get the more I realize I need young sluts in my life like I need a hole in the head. Thinking you're going to find a perfect virgin tradwife as you approach middle age is pure delusion lmao. A young girl would need to be just as stupid to get involved with you unless there's significant financial incentive. Even then you're just going to get older while she's still fairly young and fuckable. It's a recipe for disaster. That's not to say I'd say no to fucking some hot 18 year old but I know better than to let her ruin my life so bad I'll still be paying her child support after I'm collecting social security.

File: carp carp carp carp carp (...).png (141 KB, 1118x729)

141 KB PNG

>>107979115
>all i do is wait for death
I can relate. I live an idle life of a 40 yo neet. I'm relatively comfy now, but I've only seen things slowly get worse, and I can see no change of direction or pace. The enshittification of the web hasn't hit me as badly as you, perhaps because I was a bit older than you when I got accustomed to it. At least my 70+ yo uses adblock (and curses profusely whenever youtube does something that makes him see the occasional ad)

( >>107979300 )

>>107979115
Why are zoomers obsessed with 2016? The only good thing to come out of that year were the election meltdown memes.

>>107979356
>I play with legos
kys unironcially.
fucking gay nigger redditor

>>107979356
Post body

>>107992054
>catching viruses beyond the XP era
I'd say skill issue but honestly if it's that bad for you euthanasia seems like the only humane option.

>>107985561
>that isn't some zoomer shit
Don't blame this turd on us. Non of us have jobs remember?

>>107985561
there will be no 12, we are going straight to linux after W11

W12 will require microsoft account, it wont work without it and everything you do will be examined by AI

W11 is the last OS, after that only linux for us...

It's only going to get worse from here and you know it. Why would anything ever get better?

>>107993596
>worse
>implying it was good once for it to get worse
shiggery

>>107985561
not really just procrastinating the switch to linux

File: shutterstock_372315763-mi(...).jpg (80 KB, 1024x683)

80 KB JPG

>>107991119
>class based """shooters"""

>>107985693
you will own nothing

>>107991130
Radeon is only worth it if your time is free

>>107985693
This but I wish that I bought an ASUS Prime RTX 5070 when it was 600 euro.

>>107991119
TF2 should be able to run on a 7870 with flying colors, nevermind a 7800 XT.

>>107993710
O3DE is actually good and still going.

The thumbnail looked like a penis

>>107993459
Why wouldn't it be?

>>107993784
Physical limits of how tightly NAND flash can be engineered.

>>107993459
It's physically possible if that's your question, yes. The theoretical limit for information density would say the best possible microsd sized storage would be somewhere around the order of a quettabyte. The limit if we're limited to what we currently know it's possible to manufacture, it's about 4-5 exabytes iirc.