So my normal methods stopped working, jewgle wants a phone number for verification of new accounts. I tried hundreds of free sms receive websites but they are all blocked.Any suggestions anon?
You used to be able to get pre-verified SIMs on german ebay, from before the verification shit went into effect. If not, can't you use any euro network now that you're all technically one big commie brown country?
>>106520272Yeah, there are ways around this. But that means paying money now and a potential paper trail. Technically possible but annoying. Might have to take a train to the netherlands.
>>106519996god I hate H1B neal. I hope he gets prostate cancer
>>106520026Cant you buy a used one?
Did creating an account from the android setup process stop working as well?
lossless scaling edition/gedg/ Wiki: https://igwiki.lyci.de/wiki//gedg/_-_Game_and_Engine_Dev_GeneralIRC: irc.rizon.net #/g/gedgProgress Day: https://rentry.org/gedg-jams/gedg/ Compendium: https://rentry.org/gedg/agdg/: >>>/vg/agdgGraphics Debugger: https://renderdoc.org/Requesting Help-Problem Description: Clearly explain your issue, providing context and relevant background information.-Relevant Code or Content: If applicable, include relevant code, configuration, or content related to your question. Use code tags.Previous : >>106467928
>>106521404Why would I put effort into to correcting you when you put no effort into making shit up? Why do you think you're entitled to that? Put effort into your posts and people might respond in kind
>>106521410sure, don't cry about it then.You aren't entitled either."correct" is very subjective and in the age of internet, correcting someone with fax is pretty much effortless. That's actually something 4chan fags would have done several times by now. I'm just surprised that no one did so.
>>106521437We're talking about facts, not opinions. You post things are are factually wrong. You can say that we aren't entitled to read posts written by people telling the truth, but then you aren't entitlted to not have people tell you to fuck off for making low quality posts either, so consider your position
>>106521457everything you said is extremely subjective, making it very hard for me come to a conclusion. We've been circling around for a while now so I guess its a good time for me to stop.I could apologize that I'm not a bot and that I'm sorry to have got some(or all) facts wrong.But I don't think I will do that to a person who is so entitled that they won't any effort into keeping posts high in quality but cry over others instead. Sorry but you ain't worth it.
>>106521523I put effort into keeping my posts high quality, I only post things I know are trueYou don't, so you're going to piss people off, "say dumb shit until someone corrects me" does not make you any friends ESPECIALLY when you get extremely defensive when people do correct you
>>106519793Oh vey
>>106519591The jews didn't crucify Jesus. They just did everything in their power to make the Roman's do it. And it's just a coincidence that they did.
>>106519591They should have been sued by the jews for impersonation then
lol
>>106519895I thought that christcucks were saying that real jews were caanites and not Israelites and because of that Christ and his apostoles were not jewish?
>630mhz celeron>max 2gb of ram>7 inch 480p screen with beautiful bezels>small but serviceable keyboard and trackpadLet me guess, you need more?
>>106518893Which model laptop?
>be born decades after netbooks, which were always just bargain bin cheap shit laptops, have finally gone away (although replaced by chromebooks which are the fucking same thing)>glorify them for some reasonyou fake nostalgiafags need to go to a garage sale and stop posting here
>>106518934The only cringe thing is the screen being 7" 480p. 10"-14" 1080p are better imo. Low horsepower and small screen sizes are good if you are going for the lowest price and/or the longest battery life. Anorexic hardware with a good modern battery can net you 20+ hours of battery life, and for very cheap if you don't want to/can't splurge on a modern AI sloptop.
>>106519485Based t480 bro
Do you practice proper opsock to protect yourself from the NSA?
>>106508858spooge
>>106515255there are 50/50 situations in fighting games where seeing hands would give you an advantage
>>106521327this is cope for losers, evo finished pretty recently and everyone who used one of these LOST
>>106518667>he broke the law.And so did glowies by doing mass surveillance but only Snowden had to leave or be killed.
>>106518667>NOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T TELL PEOPLE ABOUT OUR CRIMES THAT'S BREAKING THE LAW!!!!!
You have to spend at least $400 editionPrevious: >>106426310>Keyboard recommendation template:https://pastebin.com/n220xk9V>Find vendorshttps://www.alexotos.com/keyboard-vendor-list // Up-to-date list of reputable vendors with brief descriptionshttps://keycaplendar.firebaseapp.com // Tracker for current and upcoming keycap group buys>This keyboard stuff is so expensive!https://aliexpress.com (or Taobao if you know how)>Learn about Cherry MX switchesComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
first handwire
>>106519372Nice, show wiring matrix & mcu
>>106517873No time to explain, just trust the quads
>use lubed red switches>typos increase, keys activate almost like a touch screenThis was a mistake.
can someone give me a qrd on keycaps? like how do I know it's a good one or a bad one?or do I just go for look? what about the size? are they all compatible with each other?
How can gift card technology be improved so it's not a huge security pain in the ass for everyone?
>>106521508
This is the most dumbest shit ever.
>>106520307your eyes are curved thoughbeit.stop being a mong
>>106520307the world you see around you is a 3D sphere. close one eye and look around, its not flat, its curved. so on a large monitor screen the edges of the image are not angled for your optimum viewing. one day you'll understand but that day is not today.
>>106520971Your mom is a 3D sphere
>>106520307whats the use case?I sued a 49" ultrawide for games like Squad and you basically have no blindspots and a realistic sense of FOV.working on them is ok. watching any media is absolutely retarded on them.
>>106520307I remember when screens were curved the other way.
>just use 7-Zip bro, freetard software is all you need-ACK!
>>1065208697zip has that option in the context menu out of the box
>>106520869also when the archive is in another codepage, like shift-jizz
>>106520869>proprietarytard is low iqmany such cases
>>106520869>>106521240uuhmmm, what the sigma?
>>106521240/thread
>makes a new browser for no reasonWhy are autistic people like that?
>>106520599It's best to just say nothing.
>>106505157> "for no reason"
>>106505157tl;dr this is unrelated to "Andreas Kling" and "LadyBird" and is related to "Brodie Robertson Addressing the Recently-Discovered Comments" + "posted by Roy Schestowitz on Sep 04, 2025" ( https://techrights.org/n/2025/09/04/Brodie_Robertson_Addressing_the_Recently_Discovered_Comments.shtml )greentext tl;dr of that image and content>grammatical mistakes>racist towards Muslims>daily use of slurs>transphobic>homophobic>bi sexual>supports and shares anime loli art>active in porn and adult meet/chatting subreddits>openly discussing fetishes>trying to meet women online>wants to make the most people angryComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>106520599>>106521412
>>106521412
> $50Why shouldn't I?
Seriously though, how much should a 2TB cost today? Preferably in a flash drive format, but fast (portable bootable OS)?
>>10652114240c
>>106521142about $160 for a good branded flashdrive
>>106520946>Why shouldn't I?Because inside there is just a very old and very slow 16GB micro SD and a circuit with a controller that reports a fake capacity. Long story short, $50 is way too expensive for a 16GB micro SD.
>>106520946WE BRING WARES FOR YOU, NO-HIVES!
.
>>106520241I hope they crash and burn. They milked GTA 5 for three (3) generation of consoles. The gap between GTA 3 and GTA: San Andreas was three fucking years and no shit covered hands touched the games.
>>106520260this>throw 1600 jeets@the problem>it is still shitalso, number of 'contributers' is intentionally misleading, you just need the right guys https://nee.lv/2021/02/28/How-I-cut-GTA-Online-loading-times-by-70/
>>106520241>rockstar indiawhy is that a thing?
Keep crying, chuds.
>>106520241How is 1615 a majority of 5929?
Where are their Apps, Websites, Operating Systems, Databases, Cloud Platforms, CDNs, AIs, or Social Medias?
>>106518786>they told me to “post hands”?>is that like a fetish or something?
>>106521237yet it was the saudis who destroyed the twin towers
>>106518786like on 4chan, saar lost the argument the moment he got mad let alone start playing with semantics
>>106518680Knowing indians exist just to lower the quality of life for everyone on this planet is mentally fatiguing.
>>1065187384chan was made by japan
What if we add game mechanics to a picture viewer?
Is this the true power of AI? Why am I paying for this shit?
>>106521243>trying to reduce what it does to word prediction Notice how I correctly predicted your inability to explain how that factual statement is a "reduction".>What do you think I don't understand about LLMs?The absolute bare basics of what they do, exemplified by your calling the high-level functional definition of the model's core "reductive".
>>106521265>reductive to what it actually producesI'm saying that the output is more than what is implied by "just text prediction", not that token prediction is not how it functions. Obviously that's how it functions, as long as we aren't talking about diffusion research models.It's a difference between how it works and what it does that I'm driving at.
>>106521299>the output is more than what is implied by "just text prediction"Then why did you use words you don't understand, instead of just spouting your self-refuting idiocy in its true form? Anyway... please explain: how can something produced precisely by next token prediction be "more than what is implied" by next token prediction? Are you mentally ill by any chance?
>>106521334>Are you mentally ill by any chance?No, I'm mentally well.Are you actually interested in talking about this or do you just want to get mad on the internet?
>>106521444>Are you actually interested in talking about thisAbout what? How you subjectively don't feel like token prediction should be able to do what it does? No, I'm not interested in talking about your subjective impressions. I'm interested in talking about how the way LLMs actually work (predicting the next token) neatly explains the unintelligent outputs they often produce.
