What gun would you use to take down a serial killer elephant?
>>64754000it's the name for that seam on your ballsack
>>64753299Based emphath
>>64753299This, nothing of value was lost
>>64753847Whites actually give a damn about animals. If you look at all those "SAARS COW IS SACRED GOD REINCARNATION OF GRANDPA!!!" literal bullshit religions, they treat animals horrendously. We eat our cattle and it's still better treatment than Indians give.
>>64755549Every cow I saw in India looked underweight and unhealthy. Even in PETA's horror videos, the animals are generally in better condition than what I saw with the religiously revered animals.Bonus points for Halal and Kosher being inhuman for bleeding an animal to death AND not allowing stunning to minimize bad kills where the cut doesn't cut go deep enough so the animal stays conscious far longer than it should.
>see grown masc man with one of those not-a-purse things>immediately assume that that is where his piece isIs this a common thought process or am I being paranoid? Is this a valid form for CC?
>>64750066I like your phone cover. Have a nice day.
I wear a manpurse like OP pic everyday, I'll never go back it's way too convenient, has my knife/wallet/keys/glock 43 nice and compactit's way slower than drawing from holster, but like 100x more convenient running out the door, I honestly recommend working one into your EDC depending on your SAWC, nutnfancy out doodets
You spend a lot of time looking at these grown masc men, anon?
>>64748142>grown masc man>not-a-purse thingsChoose one, you can't have both
>>64749154I mean it's important to clarify because there's nothing surprising about a twink with a purse
Could this realistically work?
>>64754240>come back
>>64754231Man, for a second I thought a cannon would poke out for some submersed broadsiding
>>64755640But it's not as intimidating then, that's the whole point. Plus "have half a dozen subcarriers" is not a fucking trivial thing anon. Having a half dozen real aircraft carriers of just the normal sort is not a trivial thing IRL. It'd have to come out of a reduction in other areas or vastly more military spending, which still has big costs in other areas. Is it worth it over what the same hundreds of billions of dollars could buy elsewhere?Nor is it a secret thing, and enemies aren't retarded, if they know you have a big subcarrier force then that'll be baked into their calculations. And I don't think you can do a subcarrier that's as stealthy as a boomer, which means for any vaguely competent opponent who can deploy simple underwater microphones and sonar and shit along their coastline they'll know they're there anyway. And if they're not vaguely competent then it's still not helpful because then they can't strike are your surface ships either.The dog just doesn't hunt which is why it's never been done.
>>64754560Of course there are "people" who think it is real. India exists for starters.
>>64754231You need to upgrade to T3 as UEF and also build a lot of economy and other experimentals like Fat Boy are more worth it usually
Post gear. Discuss gear. Late night edition. Level IV+ and 4Chan Gold required.Old: >>64732103
>>64754910you can also attach a swiftclip here if you wanted to use the front panel from a chest rig
>>64755460I like your rig, easy to put on, not too deep, can easily attach hydration on the back or a backpack, all you'd really gain from the caf is an extra row of grenade size pouches on the mags and the small gp on the utility pouches. Probably not worth, maybe you could ghetto rig an extra pouch on your current setup. Nice choice of optics
>>64755533Axl advanced adapter
>>64755596>$70 for swift clips and a Velcro backeror $6 for swift clips and enough one wrap to keep a placard from bouncing
>>64755587I just enjoy collecting and trying out different stuff.
Why don't drones cost 1 million dollar per unit to produce like artillery shells or missiles or any kind of military thing that isnt a drone
>>64753944Because>built like a toy out of consumer grade parts>doesn't need to survive 1000s of gs of acceleration >doesn't need to not blow up in the gun it's shot from>dosen't require precise tolerances to be accurate>safety of the launching crew not guaranteed >if it fails, send 10 more
>>64753944Please google before making claims in an OP, this is one of many multi-million dollar drones.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kratos_XQ-58_Valkyrie
>>647554991-3 million rubles to launch.
>>64755735>>64755499Ukrainian drone expert concurs with a Russian drone expert pegging the cost of a Geran at $40-45k and says their own FP-1 drone costs twice as much.
>>64753967Was. https://www.asafm.army.mil/Portals/72/Documents/BudgetMaterial/20042005/base%20budget/justification%20book/ammo.pdf
>tl;dr: the US allegedly used sonic weapon to fuck maduro's guards during the operation the whole post feel like BS propaganda to make the US seems untouchable can this be real right ?
>>64755139>the Night "Stalkers" flenced the skin off the Cubans' still-living bodies and turned their faces into party masksThose guys wouldn't have set foot on the ground. Night Stalkers are elite taxi drivers.It's Delta that does CQB.
>>64755088>landed on a kid and killed the kidWhere was this at?
>>64749382Does this read like an indian got paid forty rupees to read a Tom Clancy novel and then make up a story about how scary American tech is for anybody else
>>64749382Any actual source for this other than a Twitter post?
>>64755487>paid forty rupees to read a Tom Clancy novel and then make up a storyGrok, tell me why Maduros guards failed to kill even one attacking Delta force. Make it a twitter post from the perspective of a survivor guard.
Would you a pink gun?
>>64753376Post feet.
>>64753964Not a bad choice for anyone.
>>64753958that's fine, purple is the color or royalty
>>64755614Was that a wildly obscure M*A*S*H reference or just a statement of fact?
>>64753365Sure, why not. I wouldnt pay 400+ for a .38, though. Quality safe queen snubbies (Colt, S&W) are like 150€ here.
When the Geran/Shahed drones first appeared, I figured Russia would use them smartly in a classic SEAD/DEAD role: send waves of them to force Ukrainian IADS to light up radars and reveal positions, then follow up with VKS aircraft, with anti-radiation missiles to systematically dismantle those defenses. Russia instead has chosen the most brain-dead and wasteful approach, by treating the Geran/Shaheds s as nothing more than slow, low-cost cruise missiles hurled directly at static infrastructure targets, while leaving the overwhelming majority of Ukraine's air defenses intact and free to keep operating. They're banking entirely on brute-force volume and saturation to get a few through, completely abandoning any effort at SEAD/DEAD. But the thing is that they're not even achieving any kind of saturation effect since, the launches are scattered haphazardly across random cities, regions, and targets all over Ukraine that changes every night (some they they go after energy infrastructure, some other go after some depots, some others they try to hit some cities...), instead of making up their minds and concentrate them single high-value area, frontline sector, or even one major city at a time, and keep hitting them until achieving disruption or collapse. This is also precisely why so few targets are actually hit despite hundreds being launched every night, and so many of them are intercepted.By contrast, even in the recent U.S. operation in Venezuela, the LUCAS drones (the American Shahed clones) were properly integrated into a coordinated SEAD/DEAD package.
>>64755187>The USSR spent 60 years having a doctrine of "fuck SEADThey did have some capability, but it was really 1960s tech used in the 1980s.They had to physically switch the guidance package to suit the intended target, which was maybe sorta-kinda workable in a first strike scenario to maybe knock out some of the known NATO SAM systems, like Hawk or Bloodhound, and they even made a version that was designed to home in on Patriot's radars.It wasn't much, but it made NATO loook at the Su-24 as a real threat.
>>64749451*there COULD be failures which are then BLAMED on opponents... so why succeed?
>>64749431Cool pic
>>64751748truthnukepolniggers will call this bullshit but russia holds a huge chunk of the blame for all the horrible shit the west is facing. Cold war era active measures are why wokeness as a concept even exists in the first place, and inversely they make sure all the anti-immigration parties in the EU (up until recently) are actually self defeating and pro russian, e.g. AFD.
>>64751748Ok can you use chatgpt to correct all your grammar errors please. I can't read that
>what are you playing right now?>what are your favourite /k/ certified video games? I'll start, I've been recently playhing Read Or Not and as someone who played SWAT 4 back when it came out, I've enjoyed it so far
>>64754786The mods I use for the terrain and view distance are 'World of Daggerfall' and 'Distant terrain'. They just make the actual terrain nicer and let you see further. I have a fuckload of different mods for graphical, UI and visual changes that just make the game a bit nicer to look at. DREAM is pretty good but i'd recommend the DREAM 90's version instead since it retains a bit of the pixely look that gives daggerfall it's charm. I'd recommend AGAINST the 3d trees mod unless you have a sufficiently beefy PC since it can really fuck up performance if you use the distant viewing mod. Overall though, just shop around the nexus mod pages since you can usually find a bit of everything. The only tricky part of daggerfall is getting past the fact that it is a TTRG at heart, and not a general action adventure game.
>>64754347Sounds neat
>>64735836that game was really good before all the microtransactions and non stealth heists.
I thought this game was pretty good and very slept on
>>64737351Check out Steel Fury: Kharkov 1942 with STA mod
Previous: >>64643273Stamboulieh Law makes weekly videos on all the latest lawfare:https://youtube.com/@2alawYou've heard of FRTs, but what's a "super safety"?>uses the safety to force the reset of the trigger>allows for way more trigger options (you just have to trim two places)>invented by Tim Hoffman (https://hoffmantactical.com)>gifted to the world to freely 3D print>enterprising people now selling super safeties made of steel (recommend at least 4140)>cheaper than an FRT ($90-$150)>originally a 3-position cross-bolt safety>left is safe, right is semi, middle is super>3-position 90° super safety selectors are now availableComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>64755729
>>64755745>34,500So in other words, I'm totally fucked. Would it be any help if I told them to just put the parts in a bag and ship them to me instead of assembling the lower?
>>64755774you can sort of, they will probably say to ask them to cancel your original order then order a stripped lower as a different order.
>>64755783Guess I'll call and see what they say. I wish these companies woild adequately hire and stock so they don't run into this shit. Like only sell stuff if you have it ready to ship.
>>64755790yeah contact them, you'll probably have better luck to contact them via the contact page and email, I've gotten very quick responses from them that way
Need to know if I've been pooping myself with this, been using it for years
>>64754416rem oil is perfectly fine, except for the fact it evaporates easilyif you keep a regimen of oiling, its actually a very good oil thoughone thing to keep in mind, it has teflon in it, great for guns - terrible for you i wouldn't worry about it though, just don't drink it or whatever>>64754479>Clenzoilsame, its legitimately just a great one, especially if you're in a humid state i just wish it didn't cost so much, but its not like i shoot 24/7 either
>>64754416It's adequate for most applications. I bought it for years before I knew any better and it didn't cause me any trouble. That said, it performs much worse than many other competing products in corrosion testing so I see no reason to keep buying it.IMHO most people overthink their firearms oils. It's like women arguing over which brand of Mascara is best. Over the years I've used tons of different gun oils. Rem Oil, Kroil, Super Lube, RWS Airgun Oil, some Italian shit that came with a Benelli shotgun, 3-in-1, various Lucas products, Vactra #2 way oil, motor oil, Yamaha 2-stroke oil, ALG "go juice", Frog Lube, some little packets of something I got free from Optics Planet, WD-40, Tri-Flow, LPS industrial spray lube, LPS gun cleaner, PCL, Eezox, and probably a half-dozen others I have long forgotten. They all worked just fine. Barring some special niche exception, it really doesn't matter which product you use, what matter is that you are using SOME kind of product now and then.Washing your hands is way more important than gun oil, but do you overthink what brand of handsoap you're using?
>>64755244>rem oil is perfectly fine, except for the fact it evaporates easilyIt's supposed to. Rem Oil, and many other gun oil products, are formulated with a solvent that's meant to evaporate leaving behind a thin film of lubricant. In the case of Rem Oil, that includes Teflon particles. Most aerosol gun lubes work like this.Depending on what you're doing that can be a good thing or a bad thing. It's good if you're using the product as a cleaner-and-lube. It helps for penetrating down into built-up dirt, stuck parts, or areas that are difficult to access without taking the gun apart. The solvent lets the oil run down into all the little gaps and cracks, then it evaporates and leaves a thin layer of oil behind.
Guns don't need oil. And they definitely don't need oil sprayed on them from an aerosol can with included hormone disruption and PM2.5 pollutant.Stop wasting money and destroying the planet buying single use disposable aerosol for your toys. The leftover tablespoon of motor oil in the jug after you did an oil change is sufficient to oil a rag enough to preserve your gun for the next 100 years.
I like CLP because it actually breaks up carbon. A spray bottle is like 25-30 bucks and lasts a good while. Unless you run a range buying in bulk is nice but not necessary
Would going to an Appleseed course be worth it? I've never had any instruction in shooting and there's a few coming up within driving distance so the cost would be low. I'd use a 10/22 with an LVPO.It kind of seems like it's all old people and kids in the basic courses, though admittedly, that's probably better than getting there and finding a bunch of spergs my own age trying to look cool. I doubt I'll find a more accessible form of training but I'm not sure if this is the best format. Like how much is shooting and how much is just listening to the instructors give a history lesson?I also understand they put a lot of emphasis on sling use but the USGI sling they use seems pretty clunky from some of the videos I've seen so I may never swap to it but I do think having someone actually watching and give me feedback might help, especially if it's assumed I have no knowledge upon arrival.Anyone that's been to one want to give your impressions?
>>64753932>USGI sling they use seems pretty clunkyIt is only clunky or awkward if it is installed incorrectly or not adjusted for the shooter's arm length. The M1907 is the absolute best sling for marksmanship, once you grasp how to use it properly and have it adjusted for your rifle and arm. They will teach you how to do this at Appleseed. Go ahead and grab one before you go, they are cheap and readily available on ebay/amazon.
>>64755698Meant to add, and make sure you have sling swivels installed on your rifle, and loops that will fit the sling. M1907s are widerer than a lot of modern slings, IRC they need a 1.5 or 2 in loop instead of the 1in that comes on a lot of modern rifles. Don't bother trying to put the sling on before you go, just take it with you and an instructor will show you how to set it up.
Will you learn anything useful? No. But it's a day at the range and maybe you'll meet a new friend. If it's cheap, you should go. Don't spend real money on it though, if they want like 200 dollars or some shit, stay home and whack off instead
Don't do it OP there's cyanide in them! You have so much to live for!
>>64755768>You have so much to live for!Think of all the waifus you haven't fapped to?
Writefag here, I’m looking for real “out there” firearms that are advanced looking but not too impractical for my sci-fi setting.
>>64754907There are a bunch of reasons.>what they brought >what they can build>what they're ALLOWED I have a hombrew Traveler setting called Shattered Stars:Final Frontline where the Terran Hegemony (spess UN/NATO in spessss) where military technology is kept under STRICT control, the real good shit (powered armor, railguns, plasma weapons, laser weapons, particle beams, manpack hyper velocity missiles) are a Hegemony thing only, trying to possess, manufacture, or buy these items are a great way to get glassed from orbit.
Drone killer
Kel-Tek specializes in spaceguns OP, you could arm a whole separist faction from their website
>>64754660>cowboy-esque setting within a divided galaxyNo one cares about your Firefly fanfic.
>>64754777The ayylmao is old hat. The dragon is the new hot thang.
>880,000 dog attacks in the US of A requiring medical attention last year>Cannot be reasoned with in any capacity as opposed to most criminals that usually just want to steal your shit and will back off if they decide they can victimize someone else easierWhat calibers and firearms do you carry to protect against the pitter scurge? Shot placement?Keep in mind you may be in situations where you have to stop a loose shit bull from tearing some bystanders face off and over penetration is an actual concern when it's lockjawed onto that poor soul.
>>64755609
>>64755536Your trash ass, pit fighting dog is inherently aggressive. It will turn on you one day. It's in its DNA. Even if you say it won't, it 100% will. Most people also feel relaxed around cats. No one relaxes around shitbulls.Not to say you aren't just baiting anyway, but I'd rather be around cats than a wild alligator-dog who would turn on you if you so much as made the wrong movement or looked at it funny.
>>64754436> These things are a fucking menace and there's no solution because white people are retarded and won't regulate poor cute little puppers. The only way to win is to be prepareYou are brown and most shitbull owners are black or black fucking coal burners
>>64752904>What calibers and firearms do you carry to protect against the pitter scurge?Unironically just carry a bigass knife. Discharging your firearm means the police will get called, and then it turns into a whole shitshow. Stabbing or cutting Fido will kill it or make it fuck off, and it will be harder to paint you as a psycho who wanted to shoot an innocent dog since the dog would obviously have to be within arm's reach for you to stab it. It gives you plausible deniability. Remember that you can cut something a little but, but you can't shoot something a little bit. You're also less likely to injure an innocent bystander with a knife vs a gun if the dog is latched onto a kid.
>>64755726>vs a gun if the dog is latched onto a kid.If a dog is latched onto you or a kid you shoot it execution style in the heart from inches away, you don't step back and play target practice. That way there's no chance you'll miss vitals or hit someone or something behind the dog.
Anyone else going to the Muncie gun show Indiana
>>64750311Was Paige worth it?
>>64750993boomers trust the boob toob implicitly
Well I hope to run into one of you guys
Indiana mentioned?
>>64752595Why 3 tits tho? I fully respect putting big ol' tiddies on smexy snake ladies, but why more than two?
