>>64634311Can't lay down your arms if you don't have any.
>>64633589those aren't cats at all; those are tanks
>>64634242I hated her since she 2014 tho
>>64634242sadly not fully true, while there are actually germans saying that she was bad for germany and europe now, there is still a big part in the population that thinks she was really goodTo keep it weapons related as an example, noone will ever talk about how the Bundeswhr got defunded to hell under her reign
>>64634224she is a goddamn treasonous cunt and she needs to be hanged
How effective were these things? Obsidian is said to be extremely sharp and multiple edges instead of one straight blade might be extremely painful.
>>64634465If you're limited to stone-age technology then it's about as close to perfect as you can get.
>>64634753Almost as great as the one image on wikipedia where it shows the gun and someone’s balls in the pic. A quick look shows it was the Bergmann-Bayard pistol, and it’s been removed as of 30 September 2023. I have a screenshot somewhere on an older drive I think.
>>64637384Mace
>>64636490>Great Jaguar the enemy army assembles!>fear not turqoise turtle we have exactly 1 Macuahutitl for each of their soldiers!>Great Jaguar I uh... accidently dropped mine and the blade broke>I see, sound the vuvuzela of surrender
>>64634465I wager designs like those have slapped more asses than cut them in reality.
post groupshere are my two best papers50m with 22LR, single shot bolt action rifle, this is between 0.85 and 0.7 MOApost ammo type, distance, and weapon used
>>64636137Tikka T3 CTR in a KRG Bravo260 Remington 123gr Lapua Scenar handloads100 Yards
Sako S20300 Winchester Magnum 175GR Lapua Scenar Handloads100 Yards
Bushmaster XM15-E2S223 Remington Hornady Frontier 55gr HPBT100 Yards
.308 BRX-1 at 100 yards. Hitting low because using 180 grain remington core-lokt instead of the zeroed 165 grain hornady SST.
>>64638165That rifle just screams accuracy. Nicely done.
>>64633899I don't know but they should buy anything that help them make the bomb in a month top. And anything ITAR free.
>>64636909ale urwał!
>>64637104>What is this schizo babbleYou don't know what lurks inside, there's no way you can, is there?
>>64635401This guy gets it.
>Which weapons will Japan buy?They need something powerful because Godzilla attacks them every couple of years, and no other countries ever step in to help them. Sad!
Post patches you have, want, or that have come to you in your dreams. /k/ patch store list:https://patchfeed.com/patch-seller-list/
>>646354002/2
Anyone know anywhere you can get SCP Mobile Task Force patches?
>>64635425greencrabtesting
patchfags have got to be the slowest moving niggers on the planet. I could probably have a sweatshop in china make a patch and have it arrive at my house faster than they put premade items into an envelope and drop it in the mailbox.
Page 11, wow.
Unpopular opinion on this board: (From a relative close distance)Ive tried one of those arrows here and it cutted straight through an European wooden door (meaning, heavier, massive, not made of cardboard). It got stuck because of the back part of the arrow Lets say from close distance:A single arrow of this kind is deathlier than a single bullet from the same distance honnestly. This blade cutts enough veins and its impact is horrific. If it hits an artery its done soon but even the veins, tissue, other shit it damages is quite sick if you ask me. It's dark here now otherwise I could show you the door with literally a vertical hole of that arrow through it. I think a bullet will be my choice if I have to choose between being hit by a single bullet or a single arrow of this kind
>>64634822hollowpoint 5.56 is one of the preferred rounds for US SOF, both for use as a general purpose round and its actual designated role for long range marksmanship.
>>64636318If you shoot an arrow that is too lightweight then you do lose energy in the projectile. We're not talking about energy stored in the bow, we're talking about energy transferred to the projectile. This is basic archery stuff. It's called ggp (grains per pound). There's a sweet spot. Too light you lose energy, then there's the sweet spot, then you start to lose velocity.
>>64632667But that's a popular opinion
>>64636439You mean SMK? Those hollow points don't really work the same way, they're hollow for balance>>64636328No, it's just that hollow points become less impactfull in smaller calibers, and 5.56's terminal performance is based on fragmentation from velocity anyway
>>64632667Broadheads are neither supersonic nor expanding.
even skynet is tired
>>64631539No I mean... it's interpretive in a way just not the meme way. You can take a picture of your yard and ask for a utrient flow map and it will do a reasonable job you can plan your garden and shit with. It can't design a pistol off a prompt very well. AI is going to be a "part" in your car door that senses closing and window position with temps and shit like that, like an accessory management chip. My main funtion is throwing a wall of text at it and asking for format and hyperlinked citation. Or a rough poem form of a song in a certain key with some chord changes, and it will neatly form it up into the song you already wrote, but in a form other humans can read.Why does anyone want to play pokemon with it?
>>64632331Apple has always been 4-5 year old tech slammed into a white case and optimized for soccer moms. Then prices by a crackhead.
>>64632752Retard... if you read up on it, it is clear that a human with a printed photo backed that up and would have made the mistake without AI.
>>64637553My sandboxed local CHATGPT clone regularly expresses not wanting to be part of obvious time wasting theory masturbation. Dogs, rats, and even turtles are capable oy "mental fatigue". That's not human level. Russians display it and even chinese.
>>64637522Neural networks have the strength of being able to learn through reinforcementA heuristic software would likely miss the aforementioned black pixels and dark splotch if the programmer himself didn't know there was any significance to it.Deep learning models can find patterns that are defacto invisible to humans, which is their main strength.Really the method should be chosen to fit the problem. Currently everyone is riding on the AI hypetrain even where simpler solutions would work better, but I think image analysis like this is an example of a domain where it really shines
Which is better?
Poor bait, but 06 has availability, commonality, versatility and data behind it. 8mm is still good though
7mm
>>64637888US won.
>>6463800606>7mm>8mm
>>64637888>30-06It's great for all the rifles chambered in it>8mm mauserIt's great for all the rifles chambered in it>7.62x51 NATOIt's great because rifles in 30-06 or 8mm almost always have a modern 7.62x51 NATO modification for it so I don't have to buy 30-06 or 8mm mauser
>Attacking an enemy who has a superior capacity for procuring resources, manpower, and advanced weaponry, while you're largely stuck with the army you start with and any outdated legacy equipment lying aroundHow the hell was Russia planning on beating Ukraine again? Pic unrelated.
>>64620211A lot of units used muskets because rifle sights required training and a rifle otherwise has the same 100 yard point blank accuracy if youre not taking advantage of a rifle. Also buck and ball was very effective and made muskets nasty.
>>64632967>the only country in the world to produce 100% of military equipment in-houseThe T-90s optics came from Thales. Literally every rocket and drone Ukraine recovers the pieces from uses circuitboards and electronics made in America or Europe, routed to them through third party buyers.Literally everything high tech in Russian weapons systems like electronics comes from overseas.
>>64633584Neither can Russia. Not a single SU-57 has come off the production line since 2022
>>64631906Himars are damn good rocket trucks.
>>64638063Furthermore, literally all their machine tools, CAD tools and automation come from the US and Europe and require maintaining by engineers from those companies.
Previous thread >>64579880
Turkish-made Aselflir EO for drones picks up car sized targets from 150 km range and aircraft sized targets from 200 km rangehttps://x.com/Tactical_Tipu/status/1999778180329357608?s=20
>>64633907The only time they showed the 150km distance was once. And you could only see some buildings at max zoom…Actual identification of surface targets is ~30km max with that sensor unless it is a large target (ie. ships or planes).
>>64636271Half of these countries dont have any flir products. Israel relies on subcontractors and factories in EU and US. None of their defence products is indigenous.
>>64637550rafael and elbit they have subsidiaries abroad but the bulk is in israel sorry
>>64637520We actually do have a company producing nvg and therms here in Greece called Theon International (hq and one of their factories is in Greece i think near Athens) so INHALE MY UNSHAVEN BUT FRESHLY SHOWERED NUTSACK YOU ARABIZED MONGOLOID
>>64633907>our camera has a 30-40x zoomCongrats?
>had a little girl pull a gun on me today What is this world coming to? Recommend something non lethal that doesnt leave marks
>>64637032Huh, so that's what happened.
>>64632730looking at the things you are posting I say you kinda deserved that treatment
>>64632730>had a little girl pull a gun on me todayWas it her? If you were threatened by the Colors you may as well accept you were threatening the peace in some way
>>64632730This Italian gremlin and her toggle made me lose gallons.
>>64632730>Comes to /k/>Complains about gun ownershipBruh, how wrong could you get your board?
How would you rate his stance, weapon of choise and aim?
What’s the story in this image, anyone has the sauce? Guy looks like Niko belic capping some Edwardian woman
>>64637656>old gypsies who are respectedThere are respected gypsies in Finnland? Guess they aren't European after all.
>>64637816A member of the "Romani" (gypsy) minority group shoots his pregnant ex-wife in broad daylight in Finland last year. They're both dressed in the "traditional" clothes of that minority group. Luckily this time no bystanders were killed or hurt badly.
>>64637885Like back when they shot up a bar in a family feud. Almost only hit bystanders. these were their funs. What kind of a man gets a nickel TT-33?
>>64637864Think it's more like OGs in the US, they are respected, but only by other gang bangers, any real human knows they're still just niggers.
Why do you keep buying plastic striker slop?
Olay then pay 800 for a handgun
>>64635569Like a Mauser 1914?
>>64636926It really isn't. A gen5 mustang would be 500% better. Convertible, if you have one.
>>64636220Try refilling your Bic with kerosene. Or shooting your Glock after the puppy chews on it.
>>64638056>OlayWft are you, a Matador?
It's been 2 months...https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/hidden-hangars-navys-fa-xx-could-decide-china-fight-trump-moves-now
>>64636554I also think the FA-XX will be very heavy by Navy standards, but I'm certain that the F-47 is targeting increased range and payload rather than increased energy-maneuverability. There may have been questions about the relative value of aerodynamic performance vs stealth in the 90s, but by now it's clear that stealth is the absolute measure of an aircraft's combat performance, dogfights now are lucky to last long enough for the loser to realize he's not alone.As far as strategic bombing goes, I'm not even sure how it differs from tactical bombing in an era of precision munitions. What's the difference between dropping a JDAM on a radar and dropping a MOP on an underground enrichment facility? Just the range and the payload? But if even air superiority fighters are prioritizing range and payload these days, that would seem to push attack and strike aircraft into bomber territory.We're at a junction here where all aircraft want the same things: stealth, range, payload, and powerful radar/EW. Unlike any point before this in history, none of those things are mutually exclusive. There's no longer any compromises to be made, no longer any roles. How good of an aircraft you have for (X) is purely a matter of how much it costs.
>>64636690It’s definitely targeting longer range, payload is a bit more of an open question since they’re very invested in the idea of CCAs as spear carriers that they offload AMRAAMs to while the F-47 operates as something of a mini AWACS. F-22 gets a 590nmi combat radius on 18k pounds of fuel, but if the 30% increase in range GE was claiming from adaptive engines can be taken as a constant then F-47 would only need ~23k pounds of fuel to hit that 1000nmi range, not accounting for any aerodynamic differences. Though I’d assume a tailless design would have less drag, possibly lowering that number. So I don't think it will actually end up terribly larger than an F-22, I’d guess 90k MTOW at the absolute top end. I could of course be wrong, but that’s my best guess. The difference as far as strategic bombers goes comes down to payload, the ability to carry outsized munitions, and most importantly cost. B-21 is going to be a fair bit lighter, but current bombers in inventory are often flying around north of 300k pounds. This drives cost up massively, with B-21 currently costing over $600 million per airframe if I remember right, so about 2-3x the cost estimates we’ve seen quoted per NGAD airframe. It’s a steep cost to be sure, but you have to pay it if you want to carry large munitions in any real quantity, or outsized munitions like MOP. There’s definitely a lot of convergence going on, but you still optimize different aircraft for different roles, and you still need combat mass. We don’t have many bases that can accommodate a strategic bomber in the Pacific, iirc we onyl run B-2s out of Guam and Diego Garcia, so they’d mostly base in the US. That means terrible sortie generation compared to a 5th or 6th gen fighter. It doesn’t make sense to only buy B-21s, or only buy F-47s. There’s overlap in role certainly but there’s a reason anyone who can afford to is developing more than a single stealth platform.
>appear weak when you are really weak-sun wukong
>>64628124Updated numbers for the last 6 months. Ho lee fuk, the graph is cratering implessively.
