1/?This is the review of an OM-5 micro 4/3 camera. I am a full frame user, and I bought this camera to have a small, fun, attractive camera to take snapshits around town. I own or have owned a D850, Z5ii, Z6ii, basically every Nikon DXXX DSLR, D500, Z50, etc. This is my first M43 camera and I was not sure what to expect, so I am chronicling my impressions both for myself, and for other photographers who are looking for a small, fun camera. Ergonomics: This camera is outstanding IMO. For me the Nikon FF cameras are in this weird middle spot that is ergonomically uncomfortable for me. They are either too small or too big. The D850 and my D7500 fit my hand fantastically. I will always have a Nikon DSLR because they are so comfortable to hold and use. The OM-5 is smaller to hold than my Z5ii for example, and that gets it out of the uncomfortable middle ground. With the Z5, I’m always between holding it in front with all of my fingers, or just 3 – there isn’t really enough room for all 4, but with 3, it feels a little insecure. With the OM-5, three fingers fit perfectly. There is enough grip on the front and a great thumb rest on the back. The buttons are very well placed on the camera body for operation while shooting. Simply put, this is a very comfortable camera to hold and shoot. For reference, when I am walking around and shooting, I grip the camera the entire time in my right hand, and have a wrist lanyard for safety. This can be fatiguing with a larger DSLR (the D800 in particular had almost no thumb rest and it was agonizing to carry. The D850 is much better, but is just heavy and gets tiring on the wrist after several hours). The D7500 is extremely comfortable in this regard because of its blobmera shape and light weight. The Z series FF cameras are in the middle ground of just “ok”. The OM-5 was very good.TO BE CONTINUED
>>4489357It’s called being used to being the only non-virgin in the roo , meets MBA training, meets the experience of lording over an army of losers. My job as a senior manager at amazon consists of bullying inferior, failed men who don’t have their life together or any priorities beyond how they feel at themoment so they can get the message and learn to succeed, or go rot in a hole.Like I offer them the way to keep their job I offer you the way forward. Camera quality matters if your photos matter. A photo is only important as its subject and who it is for. If your photos are not important, you are wasting your time and money vibing out while no one cares. Hustle or die. I also offer you the option to quit. Just admit that cameras only dont matter when the photos don’t matter, and be on your way, continue not mattering. This means you have to acknowledge that cameras can matter (if the photos do). This is the last you will hear, nerd. Lunch is over. And I am firing someone named guptal today, for doing the bare minimum and spending 4 hours in the bathroom.
>>4489355What about photography as a pursuit of art? Being able to communicate through visual media can be a very challenging practice that takes a lot of time and practice to succeed at. I am NOT justifying snapshits of tree branches and fences. It just seems like your argument is not considering that there are people using cameras as a means to express themselves artistically rather than being human security cameras strolling through the forest.
>>4489360Based hustle chadFire dem micro four thirdies. If they’re not pros, they dont need cameras. Based! Trad! Work ethic! Hustle! Efficiency! Synergy! Profit! BASED!
>>4489360>muh grindsetDamn didn’t realize we were dealing with the sigma male up in here
>>4489360> tfw the only non virgin in the 'roo
show me what kind of weird shit you can make with photoshop
bluring my photos using jpeg artifacts
Welcome to /m43/general!m43 sisters, we are known to be adventurers at heart. While Wormfags and Snoybois debate mtf charts and x-trans rights, we go out and explore the world around us. Capturing its beauty within m43's infinite depth of field. In this edition: I am back to m43. I've sold my huge bulky Nikon Zf after realizing that I'm way too feminine to lug around such a huge piece of Japanese technology and I got meself a brand new OM5 Mk. II.I also got a GX9 to live out my closeted homesexual street photography urges. Picrelated is my sane financial choices in one picture. Enjoy!A list of m43 youtubers you should totally watch if you hate yourself:Landscape (leaves and rocks):Guido v. (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@GuidoVanDeWaterHenry Turner (OM5) - https://www.youtube.com/@HenryTurnerphotoWaterfall Joe (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@WaterfallJoe/videosIan Worth (OM1) - https://www.youtube.com/@ian_worth/videosComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4489236I just post the 2nd tier shit that barely survives culling. If I posted my good images you could just reverse image search it and doxx me. And because I'm from Germany and I have a problem with Jews the authorities would put me behind bars.
>>4489200that "green tint" is called grass. you should touch it some time, sweaty
>>4489303>I'm from Germany and I have a problem with Jews the authoritiesUm, based?Christoph is that you?
>>4489304>the sky, notorious for being green. from the grass. >>4489303narcissistic lying
>>4489312maybe get a calibrated monitor?
What the actual hell is wrong with my editing and photo something looks very wrong in the photo and I can’t decide on what it is I’m trying to get like a vibe Juno claspo but it doesn’t really fit that vibe
This was shot on a Canon 5D 12mp and edited in LR 3.5 on a Pentium 3 1ghz Dell c610 laptop with 2gb of RAM running XP SP3 on an IDE 40gb 4200rpm spinnydiskYour arguments, all of them in this thread, from all of you, are invalid.
>>4488401based blind man
>>4488199those star trails bug me, them seem incidental instead of intentional when clearly some level of effort went into taking & editing that photo
>>4489293Prolly just a side effect of exposing a night scene so long. I feel like anon didn't really care about three stars in the sky having a bit of a tail.In fact I would have liked it more if they were even longer (but like, 10x as long)
>>4489294>Prolly just a side effect of exposing a night scene so long.yes that's usually how you get star trailsI'm saying I would have retouched them out of the photo, or let it expose for like 4x as longthat's already like a 5' exposure, and either dawn or moonlight, so probably couldn't let it expose for much longer or the lighting changes too much
what is going to be your next hobby now that no one cares about good photos on any platform at all?
>>4489205Why is it always black and white with you dweebs.Weddings can be your bread & butter that allow you to take other photos.It's photography work that won't be replaced by AI and work that allows you to actually have an income from doing the thing you love.Does that mean you ONLY have to shoot weddings? Of course not you dweeb. Have a little broader mindset for fucks sake
>>4489218>/p/ was never good.this was an excellent board in the past, night and day with the trash thats currently posted, shit threads staying for months, thats death.
>>4489207What does this even mean? Aside from me just like taking photos and trying to preserve certain aspects and memories in an artistic way, for me to look back on, and share with family and friends, it's a hobby like any other hobby, and people's hobbies can and do change. 10 years ago my hobbies were video games and general fitness. When my wife and i had a kid I had to change up my life, which included my hobbies. So I basically went back to two of them that I did as a kid, hiking and photography.
>>4489257Bro really doesn't know that sand mandalas are one of the ascended forms of meditation
>some retard building sand castles every day that no one looks ateven if people doesnt look at things, they still influence the world. im on team photo is dead, but that was just so ignorant man.
What makes pic related so uncanny and unpleasant to look at? Is it the lack of shadows? Why would a photographer go for such effect?
>>4489126Retarded, or replying to own bait?
>>4489132Both.
>>4489126Funny how you didn't mention Canon because all professionals use Canon. No Canon = not pro. Just facts. Sorry about your bruised ego, you can get butthurt all you want, it's the objective truth. No professional would accept Sony images and no one paying a professional will be content with Sony images. Just facts.
>>4488991Most probably homosexuality
If this were /ic/, I'd say body proportions and perspective are all wrong.The combination of the hips being so much wider than the waist (perspective distortion?) and the lighting dropping off too quickly between cheeks and back (local adjustments?) suggests that the lower body is completely detached from the upper body.The lighting also makes everything look fake, but I can't explain that.
Should i get a Sony zv-e 10 II new or a Lumix S II.My goal is 4k 30fps with the highest dynamic range possible, 10bit log and fast sensor readout speed (low jellow)
>>4488812You're right about the apertures and f1.4 being a meme for it, but you do need an ND filter, that's the one piece of gear that is unquestionably needed unless you only film indoors.
>>4481494>posted it again award
>>4488812You need an ND filter if you shoot any kind of log during daylight, even stopped down
>>4488812>No need of an ND filterIf you shoot "cienema" you are gonna be shooting with a 180degree shutter. With a base iso of most cameras at 800, 1/48s outside is going to be fucking impossible. Even 100iso will be a stop over at f16.
>>4481589>unzips dickAI porn is so good its unreal. dont even need OF anymore
Anyone else here working a regular job/day job as a photographer? I've been working as a real estate photographer for a while and still do side jobs for things like corporate portraits/events, and I'm curious if anyone else on /p/ works in photography too.
>>4488755It's funny how so many gurus and people in your life say to make your job your hobby. Same thing with cars too, I knew a guy that loved cars and then fucking hated them and never did shit to his own car ever again after he started working as a mechanic. He let his car pretty much rot because he couldn't stand doing what he already did for work as an after work project.
>>4488758Entry/mid level jobs require you to sell your soul to excel spreadsheets or lung cancer for pennies over minimal legal wage with unpaid overtime. Anything that can get you away from today's hellish market is desired
>>4489009>he thinks the photography/filmography industry isn't also soul crushing or pays more than penniesLol
>>4489141I meant that market of regular jobs is so unbearable to people any escape plan is giving them hope. that means escaping right into the trap of even more competitive and ungrateful industry or hell of getting contracts for small buisness survival
>>4489179Gotcha. Same thing I did, I was in a normie regular job and jumping into a full time professional photography job sounded like a dream come true, but it just meant getting fucked in pay and essentially being told I was really lucky and other people dream of getting the job. I've no doubt they replaced in me in seconds but who knows how long the new guy will last, the industry rotates through normal people fast while only the people who are willing to be shit on will remain.
I need to find this location in map or this country
Looks like the east side of Moscow
I have way better gear but this little fucker has become a great companion for vlogging, even with all the drawbacksDo you have a favorite flawed piece of gear?
The quality is shit but the audio is great
Kodak ZI8.
>>4483068Man, that takes me back. Remember when Flip cameras were all the rage for what, two or three years there, before “smartphones” really took over? I had a Kodak one that had jelly video like crazy but it could do 720p! Used it quite a bit lol.
>>4483080The ZI8 had a few advantages over the Flip>1080p instead of 720p>Used SD cards instead of internal memory>Mic jack>Image stabilization (whatever that consisted of)I remember I had a "rig" for mine that consisted of a cheap "L" bracket with a couple of cold-shoe mounts that I used for the mic and for an external light. Yeah, it was an interesting time. Smartphones were around, but they hadn't completely taken over. And even then, the cameras on them were just "okay." So to get full HD in something that fit in your pocket AND was under $200 was pretty cool.
>>4473540is that a fucking iDroid?
was this image taken on film or digital? https://files.catbox.moe/9jjcnu.jpg
>>4488728obvious film>multicolored grain>missed focus>no shadow density
>>4488735How can you tell the difference between multicolored grain and multicolored noise?
>>4488728dynamic range feels low but i cant really tell thowhat the fuck is this captcha? oh i get it now
>>4488735>missed focusWhere?
Insta threadWill follow anyone>horgen_fotoHad anyone got tips on how to find less popular content?The algorithm is just feeding me terrible tiktok reels with millions of views all day long.
Can anyone guide or help me to recovering my account? I noticed that my account's email got mysteriously changed but I was in the middle of a trip to be able to do anything about it. And now I can't access it at all because the faggot who took it changed the passwords.
What is the best export setting for this piece of trash website? It burled the fuck out of my photos. I uploaded them from website and they were fine but phone they look like they were taken on a fucking potato FUUUUCCCK
>>4488603Zuck will ask you to send him videos of your butthole. Contact the insta team asap
>>4488784That's not due to any export setting. Instagram often just likes to not show the full (Instagram) resolution of images when you view them. Sometimes it "pops in" after a short while, but it has nothing to do with your local connection. It is insta deciding not to give your images bandwidth.
>>4488784I had the same problem. Instagram seems to be optimized for phones (as it was originally designed to be a platform for phone pictures) So if you use high format pictures those appear bigger and in higher resolution on the phone. Anything else will get compressed to shit and only be shown very small naturally.
I just got an old digicam and the previous owners didn't delete all the photos. I took a peek and some of the pics are actually kino.
If the original owner cared about others looking at the photos, they probably would've been deleted.
I'm gonna attend a wedding on saturday and i want to shoot some film. It's an african wedding, so there will be loads of bright colors and warm hues. I shoot with a Point and shoot camera (pentax iqzoom), but i own a SLR (Nikon fg 20). I have never shot with an slr camera, and i have no clue how they work. But i reckon the pictures look better on an slr. I have two dilemmas at hand>I don't know which film stock is good for capturing warm hues >I don't know if i should try out the slr camera (or if i should play it safe)i want to capture something reminiscent of picrel
>>4488924>I think it will be pretty well lit inside,NTA. Don't be fooled. Even pretty heavy indoor lighting is nowhere near the LV of the outdoors.Indoors with film I'm normally pushing HP5 to 800 at minimum and realistically to 1600 (but I think it looks kind shit pushed two stops). At 800 ISO I'm only just in a "safe" shutter speed range to avoid camera shake and I need to ask people to stay still for photos indoors.400 ISO film is absolute minimum for indoors and I'd be pushing that one stop anyway. If you're using colour film then fagghedaboudit
>>4488946Portra and Lomo 800 work fine indoors, if a bit grainy. But pushing hp5 will make the grain apparent too.
>>4488846get old gold 100 (2006-2005)
>>4488846it is possible to mount 28mm (if you have one) to fg-20 set aperture to 5.6 and 3.3m focus and shoot day with kodak 100 proimage
>>4488946Didnt understand half of that but what I got is >get 400 isoI dont really like the look of kodak ultramax 400 though. It doesn't look warm, and it doesnt have that "film" look>>4488953I have decided to use the point anf shoot so i dont think i can make adjustments like that.I need to finalize what kind of film I'll be using because im going to buy it later today. Ektar100 or kodak gold is what i am considering right now
Wetplate EditionPlease post film photos, talk about film photography, film gear like cameras, film stocks, news, and tips/tricks in this thread.Also talk about darkroom practices, enlargers, photo paper, techniques like dodging/burning, tools, and equipment related to enlarging, developing, and printing.Thread Question: What alternative processes would you like to try?Previous thread: >>4476005
>>4489122Ricoh 500 gx actually*
>>4489122B&W film + at home development is not too expensive. With a cheap camera it will take you many many rolls worth of cost before buying a digital of similar quality will "save" you money.
Lmao.https://billrolph.com/wet-plate-resolution-1
Got a 100' roll of Portra 400NC, one of my favourite films, for free. Loaded a test roll and praying to the film gods that it's not fucked.
>>4488701Gonna post results of this soon. Mail's just arrived Please bear with my snapshits when I come to develop the rolls. For now, enjoy this photo of 3 (three!) niggas.
