Famed primate scientist Jane Goodall has diedRIP
>>16803143>Blonde leg hairDon't see that very often.
>>16803143Legend. RIP>>16803152Did you grow up in Bombay? Blonde leg hair was everywhere in the 80s and 90s.
Sticky?DEP
>>16803143RIP at least she's spared from continuing yo see Trunp wage war on science and the Earth
F to an OG
>>16803143nice feet. what did she do? she is a woman so probably nothing super important
>>16803172jerked off orangutans with her feetshe also contributed to 2nd wave feminists wanting to reshape society to be more matriarchal using her work on gorillas a scientific justification, with the nuclear family erased and children being taken care of by the tribe. Essentially they pulled a leftist version of the petersonian lobster analogy
>>16803172she got gang-banged by gorillas
>>16803172She had deep insights into h1b visas and the people like you who use them.>>16803164I pray every day that the big orange retard will nuke dumb people like you off the face of the earth. Why hasn't it happened yet?
>>16803180>>16803181made for BGC
>>16803143
>>16803172She was the first person to challenge the idea that humans were the only tool users. She also made a bunch of pioneer discoveries about chimps
>>16803143Wikipedia:"Dame Jane Morris Goodall ([...]; 3 April 1934 – 1 October 2025), formerly Baroness Jane van Lawick-Goodall, was an English zoologist, primatologist and anthropologist."Grok:"1934 is the Year of the Dog (specifically, the Wood Dog) in the Chinese zodiac."
>>16803143An example of the white benevolence that brought fourth modern civilization We wont see much of that anymore
>>16803197>pray every day that the big orange retard will nuke dumb people like you off the face of the earth. Why hasn't it happened yet?Because magic sky daddy doesn't actually exist to hear your prayers?
>>16803400That brought forth 1 billion Africans
>>16803412>Indian doesn't get how American English worksI'm shocked
>>16803181>>16803226>>16803253We're not gorillas
the response on /sci/ is anemiceven /tv/ is x10 more active>>>/tv/214956810
>>16803432Are you praying to yourself? No dead jew on a stick is going to hear your cries
F
>>16803156The US but most women shave their legs before exposing them in public. I've been in relationships with a few women who would slack off on that during the winter but none of them were blonde and if they were going to have exposed legs in public, they'd shave even if it was the coldest depths of winter. Maybe blonde leg hair in public was a thing in the 80s, that's before my time, but I don't recall ever seeing it in the 90s.
>>16803197Dumb people are too interspersed with everyone else for nuclear weapons to be a useful tool for eliminating them. Removing the Darwin level safety features of common consumer products would be far more effective.
>>16803143I'm something of an ape expert myself
>person who lives in the woods in bumfuck nowhere, Africa>does little besides looking at animals all day>dies>thread starts screeching about immigrants and brown people existing in a continent a large ocean awayWhen did /sci/ become like this?
>>16803253I don't care much about her, but the monkes...
>>16804190I mean what are we supposed to say>jane goodall die>hey did you know she worked with gorillas
>>16803859>but none of them were blondeI'm sorry you dated gorillas.>>16804190Probably around the same time Nature and SciAm endorsed a drunk retard who ran cover for a braindead idiot, in the name of "science"
>>16804198The research that she did? Her methodology? The conclusions they reached? Her theories? Any science discussion about her at all? There's basically 0 science discussion here at all.>>16804206>Nature and SciAm endorsed a drunk retard who ran cover for a braindead idiotI don't know who you're talking about and I'm not sure how this is related to this woman's work.
>>16804219It's related to the post I replied to: /sci/ became a bunch of screeching antiĂŻmmigrant retards because a bunch of screeching proimmigrant retards infected our academic journals with AIDS. The anti will stop whenever the pro stops being fashy.
>>16804219>The research that she did? Her methodology? The conclusions they reached? Her theories? Any science discussion about her at all? There's basically 0 science discussion here at all.Well why don't you get us started?
>>16804249Well according to some sources she was credited with showing that apes warred with one another, and humans aren't really unique for this. If this idea was indeed spread by her research (which seems like it was just spending a long amount of time just observing the animals), then it just means that people before her were making strong conclusions about animals without enough actual data.>>16804237Your second sentence is delusional. Social media just makes it so the two sides just get pushed into further extremes. Furthermore the underlying issues pushing immigration (farm slave labor) also isn't getting solved, there is still a demand for brown workers even if you give ICE a gajillion dollars in funding. Talk about science or talk about sound policy on another board, but this "other side bad" off topic posting just shits up discussion. I doubt there's anyone here left who could do something about the bias of Nature.
>>16804308Springer Nature has never endorsed the "other side" of Trump derangement at any point in its history. You're the delusional, politics-brained idiot if you even dare to pretend otherwise. Go fuck yourself. This isn't a two way street.
>>16803625yes you are koko
>>16804345I don't know why you're so mad about me for pointing out Nature isn't going to change their stance because some fags on /sci/ are mad at them. You can continue screeching about politics until you're blue in the face, but no one in change of prestigious scientific publications will come over here and give your opinion the time of the day, all you're doing is turning this board into /pol/-lite and alienate the extremely few academics and other people who want to talk about science that are on 4chan. This isn't me advocating leftist politics, I'm talking about the state of the board.Maybe you can ask Trump to sponsor and start a scientific journal where your stances are welcomed, then you will have your 2 way street. I'm quite curious how it will turn out.
>>16804360>so mad>screeching about politicsProjection doesn't work anymore. Everyone sees what sort of fake person you are. I'm actually an academic. You're the disgusting /pol/ influence and no one wants you here.
>>16804237everyone can tell that you're shilling, it's not stealthy or anything, ask yourself when did you became like the jewish shill you so much hated, your kind are effectively killing boards dead, is that really what you fucking want you absolute braindead nigger retard faggot?
>>16804372I'm the only one between us two that talked about Jane Goodall's work and that makes me the faker one. Sure, I'll end the conversation here I guess. You have fun trying to get publications in the journals that you so despise, like a good little cuck.
>>16804190>does little besides looking at animals all dayMathfags when the science doesn’t involve sitting in a basement and writing numbers on paper
>>16804377>talked about Jane Goodall's work>>16804190>person who lives in the woods in bumfuck nowhere, Africa>does little besides looking at animals all day>dies>thread starts screeching about immigrants and brown people existing in a continent a large ocean away>When did /sci/ become like this?Your delusion about what you talked about speaks for itself.
>>16804384I can confess that was an exaggerated greentext post, but you also responded to a post where I discussed about her getting credited with discovering warring apes. Whether that is true or not, it was a legitimate facet of her work and the point wasn't discussed further despite you having the chance to respond to it. I'm not convinced you're interested in discussing the actual thread topic.
>>16804388I didn't. I'm this anon >>16803156 You're a politics-brain and don't belong here. Apologize.
>>16804390how about you suck my dick for not reading?
>>16804394I already flossed my teeth this morning. How about you choke on my blonde leg hair, sĹŤy faggot?
>>16804399No need, if I was a s o iboi, there's plenty of s o i to go around nowadays. I wonder why that is, it's like farmers acted against their best interest or something.
>>16804408>everything I say is a politics-brain messageDickless boy.
>>16804416Get to bed, be in tip-top shape for your living of sucking up to libtard journals so they can publish your trash.
>>16804426Why are you even here lol
At least she lived long enough to play Donkey Kong Bananza.
>>16804377>I'm the only one between us two that talked about Jane Goodall's workIf by talk about you mean oversimplify and incorrectly trivialise her work then sure
omg i was just at the zoo and a gorilla signed to me that it is very concerned about the systematic destruction of the white race and european identity and that the black africans hunted its whole family for voodoo black magic
>>16804537Me, too. It's a trend now.
>>16803143One of my chimp friends told me that she's actually really rude. Basically only the kasakela troops liked her
>>16804537>>16804541Wait until you hear what race(s) her grandkids are.
>>16803253Reminder koko understanding sign language has been debunked
>>16804379mathfags when the numbers have decimal points and words next to them
>>16803143I'll give her the benefit of the doubt on the monkey keys themselves, but she lived in Africa a long time.
>>16803181Gorillas have much smaller penises than Guerillas on average. Which is surprising but true
>>>/tg/96666984has even more responses to their jane goodall thread than /sci//sci/ should be deleted at this point, it's a fucking shitshow
>>16806079>/tg/ talks moreAbout the blonde leg hair?
monkey see monkey do
>>16806079This isn't /new/s, if you post a headline with 0 substance you should take it to /pol/. If you want to discus something substantive then post something of substance instead of a thinly veiled bait thread.
>>16806093>monkey see british slag monkey do british slag
>>16806081In this specific case, from what I can tell:95% is DnD, stuff about druids, and similar /tg/ things~3% is genuinely talking about the womanand ~2% is "Did she fuck the monkey?"
>>16806106but enough about the /sci/ threadas for the /tg/ thread...
>>16806106This gorgeous blonde Brit who married into Dutch nobility, then divorced back out of it because her husband smelled like Gouda cheese and had an unsatisfactory micropenis, was RIPd 3 times in the first 5 posts. Her unshaved legs were also defended, as they should be. What more do you want?
>>16806112>>16806079Meant for this tranny.
>>16806106ATA, thanks! Sounds just like /sci/ but with 95% Bonus D&D Content.I shall switch my subscription immediately.
>>16806116i'll help get you started>>>/tg/96671727
>>16806118ANON is Announcing He is No Longer BFFs with /sci/.ANON is Now BFFs with /tg/.
>>16806123What's /transgay/ do you folx have penis or vagina and do you like penis or vagina? I've given up trying to decipher these archetypes on my own.
>>16806129>i haz no vagene and i must dilate>hear mez rawr>rEEeeEEEEEee!1.You are dead to me /soi/, begone!
>>16806133
>>16803143You just know.
