Thread for the discussion of arthouse and classic cinema.Olivia de Havilland edition>/film/ chartshttps://mega.nz/folder/87xyiJjZ#3B2eXe2lmN2KbFNNEagggQ>/film/ directors directoryhttps://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1qgdYsMPAaFWrAa_7EHLpXqpOHLaDLmytM9wJ5nhGtqs>/film/ literaturehttps://mega.nz/folder/XCokCRpR#tlesB0J_7jhaEWZVJqVzlA>but anon, where do I find these films?https://rentry.org/filmlinkshttps://rentry.org/kinolinks>script to make 3x3 webmshttps://textdoc.co/D5QNYIX2avmsqi49Previous: >>201600511
Yang clears Tsai
>Hands up, you will marry me and have sex with me or I'll kill you
there is still time to write the kino of you dreams
>>201632675AAAAAAAAAAAAA NO PLEASE DON'T FORCE ME TO HAVE INTERCOURSE WITH YOU NOOO
>>201632650Yang was in the fortune cookie business. He made movies for western boomers who bought into the ancient Chinese secret, wise incense burners, feng shui, the gong hits and all that phony wrapped-in-fortune-cookie wisdom and confucian aphorisms. Right place at the right time. Yang props up his street sage table while at the same time his always intended audience began thinking the myths were being validated before their eyes, the east asian takeover, economy miracles, Made In _____.His film Confucian Confusion (if the title wasn't enough to tip you off) is a confession and a portent of Yang's intent to be orientalist export product. He was a GRIFTER. Made just in time for the first generation of Taiwanese-Americans. Taipei Story, his first great effort (relatively speaking), dreams of going to the US. You should've taken Yang at face value on that one and understood that was always his goal. He studied in the US and lived in a Beverly Hills mansion until his death, only flying to Taiwan to shoot movies there. Dishonest filmmaking to its core.
>>201632816Didn't read, won't read. Yang is clear.
>>201632675Why would someone ruin his life for this hag, she literally looks like a romanian grocery clerk from a shop around the corner.
>>201632816Meds
>>201632570Is it really not possible to do Brakhage-like manipulations on digital?
>>201632816>He studied in the US and lived in a Beverly Hills mansion until his death, only flying to Taiwan to shoot movies there.Yep. He's only a step away from McDonald's arthouse.
>>201633009It's another medium, really. You can do similar stuff but it won't be as human as intervention on actual film reel, let's say.
>>201633009Well obviously you can't physically scratch or paint on digital like you can on film frames. Both digital and film have things you can't do with the other.
It must really hurt that you force some meme label FOR YEARS and still no one but you uses it>nah, I don't carelmao
>>201632816>Confucian ConfusionThat's only the English title RETARD.
>>201632942We really need a /lgbt/+/film/ general to filter the scum.
>>201632693I unironically believe so with all my heart. How hard could it really be?
>>201633165Yang lived in the US and spoke English. No doubt he selected the title.
I really can't finish French movie.
>>201633169Serious question, are you brown?
which essential american flimcore must be watched? like Billy Wilder
>>201633316Serious question, are you gay?
>>201633394Burnett
>>201633394Nicholas RayMonte Hellman
>>201633394Sunset BoulevardTreasure of the Sierra MadreWhite Heat
>>201633408It was kinda obvious, but I still had to ask. Don't bother to reply because I won't.
>>201633459Indeed it was obvious you were a fag, you're kind has to spread your deviancy and hatred for women everywhere you go.
>>201633394FordVidorFullerPeckinpah>>201633420>>201633448Also good picks.
>>201633394John Huston
Ma che bella donna!All Ladies Do It (1992)
>>201632570Are people who watch films more likely to fall for government psyops than those who don't, or does it depend on the type of film, maybe even genre, that determines the susceptibility to the underlying message in its program?
>>201633603The guy reclining on the bed behind her is gorgeous, he has such luscious lips.
>>201633632I'd say it's the opposite. At least people who actually engage with the movies instead of passively watching, so maybe a very small percentage of all viewers.
>>201633174How badly do you want to get into women's pants? After all, isn’t that what it’s all about?
>>201633394All the main films from the big guys at least: Ford, Hawks, Welles, Wyler, American Hitchcock, Griffith, Keaton, Chaplin, Lloyd, Lubitsch, Borzage, Berkeley, Capra, Sirk, Selznick, Kazan, Huston, Coppola, Mann, Ray, Boetticher, Zinnemann, De Palma, Scorsese, Spielberg, Peckinpah, Friedkin, Allen, Malick, Lumet, Demme, Bogdanovich and many, many more
>>201633756Sir this is /film/, not /amerislop/.
>>201633512>Ford>Vidor>Fuller>Peckinpahliterally who?
>>201633632>maybe even genre, that determines the susceptibility to the underlying message in its program?Yes. Someone who mostly watches avant-garde is likely a very different person from someone who loves films with partial government funding, be that Top Gun Maverick or Chinese blockbusters.
>>201633784Gladly I'm not mentally ill like you are and hopefully I was replying to someone who also isn't.
>>201633789/hor/ is on the other tab
This general gives off very bad vibes
>>201633795Chinese blockbusters are /film/
>>201633881The heckin vibes are off
Great scenehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMWkTOJxbyA
>>201633678Funny, I was considering cropping him out of the picture, but I’m glad I didn’t because you liked him.
>>201633756thanks ChatGPT
>>201633744Not as badly as my desire to redeem myself and earn respect
>>201633881So much this, there's an undercurrent of anti-trans sentiment that just throw the vibrations off.
>So much this, there's an undercurrent of anti-trans sentiment that just throw the vibrations off.
>>201634323And misogyny!
>>201634346She's beautiful, thank you for posting her alongside a greentext of my post.
>>201634360Transgenderism is just another form of misogyny.
>>201634296ChatGPT wouldn't mention Borzage
>>201634296ChatGPT would remember many more names than me
>>201634385Hating transwoman is the same as hating bio woman.
>>201633678>>201634212Ew, fucking faggots
>>201634414You're a misogynist and probably a pedophile as well, kindly throw yourself off the nearest tall building.
>>201632570Can a correlation be drawn between people who watch movies regularly and the uptake of mRNA? Are people who like Corbet, for instance, more likely to take government products?
>>201634460That's pure projection on your part and you know it, and I shan't oblige with your demands for suicide and instead wish upon you to acquire an open and tolerant mind.
>>201634468what's the connection here
>someone disagrees with you>now you need to seethe for hours and shitpost desperately, even going the /pol/ route looking for attention/film/ gets the most insane people, truly
>>201634515I'll never be tolerant of your child mutilating fetish cult and I wish the worst for all of you.
Since when has /film/ become infested with trannies and lawyers?
>>201634562Movies are avenues for influencing attitudes, and thus behaviors. More generally, they can be used as propaganda to suggest ideologies which are in line with government policies.
>>201634605But enough about you "centrist"-kun
>Competition “The Room Next Door” (dir. Pedro Almodóvar)“Campo di Battaglia” (dir. Gianni Amelio)“Leurs Enfants Apres Eux” (dir. L Boukherma, Z Boukherma)“The Brutalist” (dir. Brady Corbet)“The Quiet Son” (dir. Delphine Coulin, Muriel Coulin)“Vermiglio” (dir. Maura Delpero)“Iddu (Sicilian Letters)” (dir. Fabio Grassadonia, Antonio Piazza)“Queer” (dir. Luca Guadagnino)“Love” (dir. Dag Johan Daugerud)“April” (dir. Dea Kulumbegashvili)“The Order” (dir. Justin Kurzel)“Maria” (dir. Pablo Larraín)“Trois Amies” (dir. Emmanuel Mouret)“Kill the Jockey” (dir. Luis Ortega)“Joker: Folie à Deux” (dir. Todd Phillips)“Babygirl” (dir. Halina Reijn)“I’m Still Here” (dir. Walter Salles)“Diva Futura” (dir. Giulia Louise Steigerwalt)“Harvest” (dir. Athina Rachel Tsangari)“Youth – Homecoming” (dir. Wang Bing)“Stranger Eyes” (dir. Yeo Siew Hua)>Out of Competition – Fiction“Beetlejuice Beetlejuice” (dir. Tim Burton) “L’orto Americano” (dir. Pupi Avati)“Il Tempo Che Ci Vuole” (dir. Francesca Comencini)“Phantosmia” (dir. Lav Diaz)“Maldoror” (dir. Fabrice Du Welz)“Broken Rage” (dir. Takeshi Kitano)“Baby Invasion” (dir. Harmony Korine)“Cloud” (dir. Kiyoshi Kurosawa)“Finalement” (dir. Claude Lelouch)“Wolfs” (dir. J Watts)>Out of Competition – Non-Fiction“Apocalypse in the Tropics” (dir. Petra Costa)“Bestiari, Erbari, Lapidari” (dir. M D’anolfi, M Parenti)“Why War” (dir. Amos Gitai)“2073” (dir. Asif Kapadia)“One to One: John & Yoko” (dir. Kevin Macdonald, Sam Rice-Edwards)“Separated” (dir. Errol Morris)“Israel Palestine on Swedish TV 1958-1989” (dir. Goran Olsson)“Russians at War” (dir. Anastasia Trofimova)“Things We Said Today” (dir. Andrei Ujica)“Songs of Slow Burning Earth” (dir. O Zhurba)“Riefenstahl” (dir. Andres Veiel)“Disclaimer” (dir. Alfonso Cuarón)
TIFF getting announced soon.
>>201634635american hours
>>201633394
>watching films from current yearshiggydiggy
>>201634468most zoomers got the clot show, and they watch less movies than any other generation today. I don't think movies really matter that much in the grand scheme of things. Social media is a thousand times more powerful tool of influence.
>>201634761t. darkielover
>luv traps>'ate trans"women">simple as
>>201634839>I love eating shit>I hate eating diarrheaThat's you
>>201634824>darkiejust say nigger, you faggot redditor. also nigger or not, you can't deny that Symbiopsychotaxiplasm is one of the greatest American films ever made
>>201634791instead of tunneling on it being caused by one thing, why not focus on a more reasonable explanation? such as it being the cause of a multitude of things which contribute to a person's behavior. i bet a capeshit fan is more likely to have given in to government coercion than someone who only watches 20th century nippon films.
>>201634933>someone who only watches 20th century nippon films.This person doesn't exist
>>201634885wrong. there is a very big difference between someone like this and the 'MA'AM"s that occupy discords and twitter
I've watched everything by Lynch except Twin Peaks.
>>201635078>there is a very big difference between someone like this and the 'MA'AM"s that occupy discords and twitterThey're both men and you're gay if you find them attractive.
>>201635078That's someone's son.
>>201635116okay
>>201634699>Out of Competition (Series)Disclaimer, dir: Alfonso CuaronThe New Years, dir: Rodrigo Sorogoyen Del Amo, Sandra Romero, David Martín De Los SantosFamilies Like Ours, dir: Thomas VinterbergM: Son of the Century, dir: Joe Wright>OrizzontiNonostante, dir: Valerio MastandreaQuiet Life, dir: Alexandros AvranasMon Inséparable, dir: Anne-Sophie BaillyAïcha, dir: Mehdi BarsaouiHappy Holidays, dir: Scandar CoptiFamilia, dir: Francesco CostabileOne of Those Days When Hemme Dies, dir: Murat FiratogluFamiliar Touch, dir: Sarah FriedlandMarco, dirs: Jon Garano, Aitor ArregiCarissa, dirs: Jason Jacobs, Devon DelmarWishing on a Star, dir: Peter KerekesMistress Dispeller, dir: Elizabeth LoThe New Year that Never Came, dir: Bogdan MuresanuPooja, Sir, dir: Deepak RauniyarOf Dogs and Men, dir: Dani RosenbergPavements, dir: Alex Ross PerryHappyend, dir: Neo SoraL’Attachement, dir: Carine TardieuDiciannove, dir: Giovanni Tortorici
>>201635116even all his shorts? he's got some stinkers. go watch Twin Peaks now. comfy show
>>201635134that's why it's based
>>201635126I'm not attracted to men that look like men, just men that look like women. which is still gay, yes, but I feel it's less gay than someone who is attracted to someone like this>>201635134and that's a good thing
>>201635243>it's less gayGay means you are attracted to other men. Whether they wear a dress or a suit doesn't come into it.
We should cut EU public funding for experimental garbage that nobody watches.
>>201635392>experimental
>>201635503Just put "subversive" anywhere in the movie description and have some gay shit going on that nobody cares about but a clique of elite fartsniffers and you collect taxes from the EU public.
>>201635277I already agreed that it's gay, and I can see you're not going to accept my point, so no more responses after this. but would you really say that a man who likes getting pegged or his ass eaten out by a woman is not gayer than someone who just fucks women, even if they are all technically straight actions? there are different levels of straight or gay
>>201635277If you were forced to have sex with one of these people which would you choose?
>>201635669False dilemma, both are freaks.
>>201635392Agreed that public funding should be cut entirely, but one does not get any public funds if they're actually experimental. Publically funded films are all formally safe trash with government-approved messaging. Possibly the least artistic form of filmmaking there is, even lower than capeshit.
>>201635669Buck for sure, she's a woman
>>201635669>forced>chooseYou're a fucking idiot.
>>201635732gun to your head, you must choose to fuck one of them or you will die
>>201632942True. >>201633169Triggered morons don't know that the film business was not a respectable profession for beautiful society girls or even beautiful girls of any class because they were whores and untraditional in most of the cases. That is why you this ugly Ukrainian origin golem made up with 10 pounds of powder and cream and 500 watts of brute lights to make her more "appear" prettier using soft lens and smoke. All of these women drank smoke heavily.
>>201635754If things have come to that point, death is the most honorable choice
>>201635732forced to choose between two selections, yes also i watched imamura's ballad of narayama last week
>>201635277So If you're attracted to transwomen that look like pic related ... you're straight ? Boy, I have news for you ... you're gay.
>>201635690>>201635783You have to pick one or you and everyone you loves burns in hell for eternity
>>201635823transman*
>>201635823I'm not attracted to ugly hairy women with mental issues, sorry.
>>201635702Haha you would fuck that you a gay ass nigga lmao
>>201635870Then I’ll purposely not pick either >:)
Trannies ITT revealing just how regressive, homophobic, and sexist their entire ideology is.
>>201635918I've asked this question probably 300 times over many many years on this website and it's basically a law now that if someone doesn't want to answer that means they pick Bailey... Out of the people I got to answer after pestering for many posts they always pick Bailey. It's obviously the less gay choice
>>201635924homophobia and sexism is based thoughbeit
>>201635914She's a woman, the other woman looking man has a dick, therefore, if I fuck him, I'd be gay. Checkmate atheist.
>>201635992Bailey is gay because he has a dick, Buck's pussy is top notch
>>201635992I just want everyone I know to suffer for eternity including myself
>summerfags shitflinging /pol/ & /leftypol/ arguments againcan we just get back to discussing films? what have you been watching recently, anons?
>>201632816Yi Yi is still the best film ever made
>>201636117This guy is a tranny coping
Films?
>>201636056Even this cat?
>>201636142The Crying GameThe Danish GirlBreakfast On PlutoA Fantastic WomanTangerine
>>201636117I'm watching X (2022) then Pearl (2022) later. Gonna watch Maxxxine tomorrow in my local kinoplex.
>>201636117I love this. It's like Come and see in feudal Russia.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PECLvrLLgNw
>>201636129lmao
>>201636148I purposely don’t love the cat so it’s spared
>>201636129I prefer A Brighter Summer Day
>>201636300lmao @ u, tastelet
>>201636129Filmed theater. Anti-cinema. Actor worship.
/film/, what do we think about Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga? It's unpopular and flopped amongst normies so maybe it's worth considering as a hidden gem.
>>201636397Meds
>>201636438EYKWTD
>>201636438Off-topic, you know what to do.
>>201636438Doesn't fly, I think, your typical /film/er can't into genre cinema
>>201636438Plenty of slop flops all the time. That doesn't mean anything by itself.
>>201636438Good insight. Rarely do we have questions that challenge the normative operations here at /film/. The short and sweet of it is, yes. Absolutely. The more DEI the better.
>>201636480Not your personal army
>>201636547Horrible argument
>>201636637It's a statement, not an argument, you ESL fool.
>>201636670Wouldn’t that make it a horrible argument then? A cup is a horrible car.Checkmate, retard
>>201636637If you want to report something, go ahead and do that. But your dreams of wannabe janny deadstop at your end.
>>201636670an arguement could also be a premise, an idea, something prompting an intial statement
>>201636700>Wouldn’t that make it a horrible argument then?No.>A cup is a horrible car.No, it's not any sort of a car. Take some English classes.
>/film/'s dullest ghoul gets upset by being called ESLlmao
>>201636708>deadstopkys
How about some satire films from the last decade?
>>201636738>can’t interpret ideas or concepts >can’t think philosophicallyYou’re worse than ESL- you’re literally retarded
The Crowded Train 1957 by ichikawa
>>201637029>throws around words like 'philosophically' to cover for his lack of educationMany such cases.
Where is offtopic dude when we need him? This thread sucks
>>201637029That's not how linguistics work tho
>>201637104/film/ sucks, and actually has always been shit even when it wasn't as bad as it now
Found this really boring, I really liked City of Pirates and Love Torn in Dreams so its a shame.
>>201637158>Found this really boringwhy
>you were warnedOh noes, not le warnerino! Get bent, janny
>>201637188The kid couldnt act for shit and the surrealist/magical elements felt really hollow. Didn't care about anything that happened
>>201637158B word stopped reading right there opinion immediately discarded
>>201637458Boring post
>>201637458how would you know the subject is a word without having first seen its content?
>>201637544Based, you btfo of that faggot, he doesn't have an answer for this
>>201637663he got got
>>201637487filtered
>>201634699San Sebastian clears this line-up just by the virtua of having new Serra there.If your OOC line-up looks better than your comp you're in trouble. I'm interested in Wang Bing and I will check out the new Guadagnino due to the source material.
>>201636438Ok film, that's about it. Better than most mainstream slop though.
>>201637158Watch Three Crowns of a Sailor
Has anyone seen this? Any thoughts?
>>201635690Left is a woman. You said it.
>>201638906>Has anyone seen this?Yes, there was plenty of discussion about it earlier this year.>Any thoughts?A dizzying, dazzling feat of social critique. A maddeningly radical Godard-meets-Harmony Korine Romanian masterpiece. Wild, hilarious and cryptically profound.
TODD PHILLIPS WON
>>201638334kino
Speaking of trannies https://x.com/Matty_Ixnay/status/1815758915986166191
>>201639300Okay, Matty.
>>201633603Mamma mia!
>>201634346Mamma mia!
The fuck has this general become? Why are 90% of posters acting like fucking morons? Wtf, fuck you, I don't want to talk to you anymore. Cunts
>>201640179Settle down sis, are you on your period or something?
Is it just me or do movies from the early 30s have a severe lack of soundtrack? It's like they leaned so hard into synchronized dialogue they thought music was unnecessary
>>201640547Bresson is one of the only filmmakers who really understood music in film and used it well.
>>201640547Modern-day directors could learn from them. Most filmmakers use music in such obvious and generic ways that many film scores often become unintentionally comical.
>>201640547Then these filmmakers understood cinema, films should have no narrative, actors and preferably no music or sounds as well, all of it denatures the true meaning, intention and purity of the captured images.
>>201634699>out of competition looks more interestingVenice is just advertisement for Hollywood at this point
>>201634699>Almodovar>Salles>Wang>Kitano>Korine>Kurosawaonly ones I'm even slightly interested in
>>201641669oh and Diaz, I missed him
>>201641669>KitanoThought this fag retired already.
I'm becoming a sociopath slowly but surely; I've had enough of this world, movies for this feel?
>>201642778Joker
>>201642778Purple Noon
>>201642778Joe Pesci in Goodfellas and Casino?
>>201642778>>201643004Dead Calmhttps://youtu.be/SkqZd3h3f2U
Watch more De Palma. Master of Kino.
>>201634699>>201635144>new Rohrwacher stars Leos Carax
>>201643617>more De PalmaAlready seen that and his later films are crap.
>>201639018Fuck off you fucking miserable cunt.
>>201644184Want weirder? The new Guadagnino stars Lisandro Alonso and David Lowery.
>>201644264Femme Fatale is kino you FUCK
>>201644365Is this a certified humiliation ritual?
>>201644365schifo Guadamerdino
>>201644652basatissimo
>>201642813>>201643004>>201643267Have seen all 3>>201643419I'll check it out
What are some good musicals?
>>201644442His last good film lmao.
>>201644912Moses und Aron
>>201644942Yes, and it's a fantastic one. Pity he didn't retire on that high note.
>>201644912
>>201644955More 'interesting' than good or bad, like all Straub-Huillet. Actually, often they managed to not even be interesting, those dirty commies.
>>201644264>>201644942>>201645006I liked Passion and Domino.
>>201645114>More 'interesting' than good or badThis is how all art should be viewed. There is no such thing as “good” or “bad”.Hopefully, you’ll all come around to this fact. If not- back to capeshit for the lot of you, ranking and numbering art as GOOD or BAD experiences, whatever the fuck that delusional naivety even means
>>201645194But you're a dumb faggot.
>>201645308Rude.
>>201645301Stop trying so hard
straubidi huillet
>>201645644Upvoted!
>>201645659Thank you kind sir!
>>201639091Joker is literally certified /film/ at this point.
>>201645644I didn't even know a contraption like this existed, quality doesn't look too bad even.
>>201645644based, but I prefer the calculator
>>201645727What about audio?
>>201646138film is a VISUAL medium
>>201646197It's an AUDIOvisual medium, sweetie.
>>201646257wrong. audio is worthless
>>201632942I like Stanwyck as an actress, but she never would've gotten her foot in the door if she had started a decade later than she did. Ditto a lot of other 30s actresses. De Havilland debuting in 1935's Captain Blood is when the beauty standards started to change for the better.
>>201645727Ohhh the 8 halves
>>201646468Ok
What's the best /film/?
>>201646880L'Argent
>>201644912afuny ting ahpend on the ay to the form
>>201646257Sweaty*
>>201646880Doc's Kingdom
>>201646468Bullseye opinion. And no bigger case of an 'odd' beauty from the Hollywood's Golden Age than Bette Davis.
>>201646257It's film, not filmusic or filmearstrue cinema should be forbidden to have any audio at all
>>201647240You can have your true cinema, just mute everything, fucking retarded faggot
>>201646313It's not worthless, you're retarded.>>201647240Most film has audio in the same strip.
>>201647328Based
>>201647366Fool.
>namefagging
>>201647424Retard.
>>201647504Cry.
>>201647540Die.
>>201647328>>201647419Dumb and low iq, you can't even fathom how the process itself of capturing audio negatively influences the filmmaking
>>201647567After you.
>>201647583Explain it, smarty-pants.
>>201647592Nuh uh.
>look how different I am mom, they can't get how special my ideas are
>>201647655Too late.
>>201647689Too early.
>>201647615you have to approach filming and locations in a different manner than if you cared only about the visuals themselves, that's self-evident
>>201647720That's what I wanted you to think.
Somehow, /film/ always manages to get worse...
>>201647745Somehow, /film/ always manages to get worse...
>>201647754>>201647771Somehow, a fag made a double post
>>201647729You are self-evidently retarded.
>>201647798Not an argument.
>>201647784Somehow, you're retarded and should lurk moar.
>>201647729You're too retarded to warrant any more replies. Have a last (You).
>>201633394>There will be blood>The Master
>>201647819Of course it is. You base your arguments on self-evidency. And I say your arguments show that you are, by the same criterion, retarded.
>>201647798Ok let me explain it to you and the rest of the Marvel crowd in low IQ babby speech >oh noes we cannot film in this placerino, there's too much noiserino and peoplerino won't be capable of understanding muh PLOTERINO and hear the voices of the ACTERINOS oh noes instead of capturing this interesting visuals let's go somewhere else! Satisfied?
>>201647912Also Punch-Drunk Love, Boogie Nights and Licorice Pizza.
>>201648020Also Hard Eight, Magnolia and Phantom Thread.
>>201647992Using your 'normal' posts or your attempt at satire, you manage to fail all the same, since the the idea itself is stupid. Your understanding of art is primitive and limited.
>>201647912>>201648020>>201648063Inherent Vice >
im watching Costner's Horizon and this shit is really goodwhat the fuck were people complaining about? yes,it's a bit cliched and not every plotline is as interesting, but every idiot who said "this should be a miniseries" is retarded through and throughthis has the grammar of an epic, not a tv show
>>201648149Pynchon is unadaptable to satisfaction, really
>>201648180all that mattered was bringing the characters to life and in the flesh in a fun and complex way, which the film did and I don't even like PTA that much but he knew exactly how to adapt Pynchon. Joaquin Phoenix, Brolin, and Joanna Newsom were brilliant.
>>201648163the only real complain I can think of is that all the women are too beautiful
>>201648104I argumentatively crushed you into speechlessness and ad hominems, you're just an embarrassing little fellow.
>>201647992So confidently wrong. You can film in the placerino because most of the time it's a controlled environmentarino and if it's not there are these things called microphonerinos.
>we're discussing costnerslop now /film/ has fallen
>>201648262No one will stop you from believing your own retardation, no.
>>201648296>controlled environmentarinoMy point exactly, have fun with your audio musical slop produced in greenscreen cubes.
>>201648020>>201648063i do not agree that the ones you stated are essential viewing besides Phantom thread. they're PTA-completionist viewing at mostI didn't include Phantom thread since it's not an "American" story or setting although I do like it a lot.>>201648149I forgot to include (this)>>201648180being unable to divorce the adaptee from a whole film production of its own is peak midwit. it's Pynchon's source material, but try to realize that it's a script adaptation for the big screen, not a visualization of a book
>>201648316Cope
>>201648316 why not? I am and I will
>>201635692>Agreed that public funding should be cut entirelyWhy?
>>201648429Because I'm a fascist and I don't want my taxes to fund marxist movies
>>201648365You have to be trolling. A controlled environment doesn't have to be a studio sound stage retard.
Does the baker want to watch experimental films? Does the milkman? Does the housemaid? Does the Uber driver?Exactly, it's a cinema against the common man and woman, a cinema for people divorced of the world, a cinema for the blind and deaf.
Watched High Sierra (1941). Was this really a done thing in the USA that a 42-year old man would ask a 16-year old girl living with her parents to marry after having barely met her a few times? Don't think I've seen that trope before
>>201648429I wan't my tax money going to important things, and not shitty films.
>>201648529The mightiness of the 2024 fascist, to shitpost on 4chan!
>>201646880The Travelling Players
>>201648557Based
>>201648608The mightiness of the 2024 marxist, to drink champagne and suckle on public funding while the people starve!
>>201648674kek, I'm not a marxist, I'm just a normal person not sucked up on crazy ideologies
>>201648739People with no convictions just get ignored until they aren't.
The following is a test:HitlerAdolf HitlerHitler AdolfAd Olf Hit Ler
>>201648858The painter?
>>201635692iirc the guy who directed Robocop (Dutch guy) moved to Hollywood because he was sick and tired of conforming to all the dumb rules you have to follow when you get public funding. (which is the only way to make a picture in West Europe) Things like: make socially relevant picture, include feminist theme, explore x subject etc... the only pictures worth seeing from my country are ones directed by Foreigners with foreign funding. Which is kind of sad.
>>201648858The writer and philosopher?
>>201648937Nowadays, Hitler is actually overrated as a painter
>>201648858The architectural genius?
Brutality in Stone (1961) dir. Alexander Kluge
>>201648858the nigger?
Kino movie about cute animal, winner winner chicken dinner
>>201649382Off-topic, you know what to do.
ay watchu doin you fookin arse I will fook you oop nuka.
>>201649382Greatest cinematic achievement of the 2010s
Somebody please kill the le off-topic know what to do fag
>>201649422Animals are forbidden on /film/, euthanize this critter and throw it into the furnace.
>>201649398This isn’t me- I first posted the “off topic- everyone, you know what to do” and I just want everyone in the thread to know what I didn’t post that in this instance. I’m very selective and very precise when I post it, and it’s always correct. This person is a liar and a fake and doesn’t know what true cinema is, and for those reasons- everyone, you know what to do.
>>201649473lmao
>>201649526Off-topic everyone, you know what to do.
>>201649491Read>>201649526
300 posts- everyone, you know what to do
>>201649536What's so funny?
>>201649526>>201649561>I'll have y'all know I'm very exclusive on my shitposting, so respect meSometimes this place still surprises me
>>201649604>tries to improve the thread by calling out when people post off topic>is labeled shitpostingYou newfaggots are absolutely fucking braindead retarded
>>201649663That you take yourself and this place so seriously only makes it even funnier, or pathetic depending on the point of view
>300 posts>more than 100 are from me aloneWhen I don't spend my day shitposting here, this general either crawls to a stop or simple dies
>>201649801>simple diesMaybe you should follow the thread
NEW>>201649851>>201649851>>201649851>>201649851NEW
>>201649663You're not improving anything you pathetic wannabe janny
>>201646880Joker
>>201649834You act tough, but you need me desperately
>>201649473yes its certainly up there
>>201635392Back to your grave, Old Schwurhand.
>>201635992>I've asked this question probably 300 times over many many years on this websiteMaybe it's time to get some help.
>>201634699That's such an odd competition lineup. Is Wang Bing taking the Golden Lion?
