Trekpu Probert Concept EditionPreviously, on /trek/: >>217253849
star trek sex with shran
Commander tell me about your sexual organs.
>>217265083>Would you flash your penis to an androgynous alien?
star trek sex on de beach with shran
trek sex shran with star
>>217264912interesting trekpu image because it's kind of unusual isn't it? usually trekpu is there being his own guy in a scene with others. he's not usually recreating scenes as other characters
thoughts on the demoralization campaign?
FREIGHT
Post riker mental breakdown webm pls
the kazon really knows how to treat woman, its refreshing to see that not all quadrants are pussy-whipped.
>>217253992Mostly episodic with a small overarching plot that, over the course of the season, snowballs into a season ender 2-parter. I'd like to see a decent amount of action, actually I'd quite like a Maquis 2.0 situation, but even bigger in scope. Mirror Terran agent provocateurs create a human-first splinter group that begin taking violent action and attempting to break parts of the federation off, at least for a couple seasons. Could have a really sick cap-off final encounter where the captain and his mirror counterpart battle ship against ship, eventually shattering the mirror ship's saucer ala pic related.
>ALL HANDS PREPARE FOR MULTIBALL!
>>217267750>1 replaces Iunwatchable
>>217264912trekpu is such a whimsical goofball!
>>217268678>imagine the smell
4 days until Academy hits streaming and reviewers say it's the most relevant iteration to date.
>>217268722Motor oil and unwashed pusy
>>217268934>it's the most relevant iteration to dateAh, so everything about it is just modern politics and other modern shit with a thin veneer of Star Trek because the writers couldn't make a successful pitch without setting it within an existing IP.
>>217268722this was the better lookthey could still give her hair though to appeal to cowards
>>217268934reviewers are whores who say whatever they're paid to say
>>217268934The only question that needs to be asked is, "Is this what Gene would want?"
>>217269219Gene would've killed himself during Voyager
What's the Star Trek equivalent?
>>217265083>>217265095I can't help it. Every playthrough Romance her. Always loyal to her in main campaign of ME2
>>217269530https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catspaw_(Star_Trek:_The_Original_Series)
>>217269530
>>217269174The shill can't even be honest about what the paid reviewers had to say: >>217227620>t-they said it's relevantSelective with the truth much? When even early-access "I clapped when I saw it!" YouTubers are saying it takes multiple episodes to even get good (by their standards), you know it's fucking terrible.
>>217269570>William Shatner's Cyber Masterpiece
>>217269477was he allergic to massive tits?
>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>On the Starship Enterprise under Captain Kirk.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>Boldly going forward 'cause we can't find reverse.>Lt. Uhura, report.
i've started watching tng, i'm about 17 eps into the first season. i love the holodeck episodes, do they start exploring that more as seasons go on?
>>217269827>There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow;>there's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, Jim.>Analysis, Mr. Spock.
>>217269848>It's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, not as we know it; >it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, Captain.>There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow;>there's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, Jim.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>On the Starship Enterprise under Captain Kirk.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>Boldly going forward, still can't find reverse.>Medical update, Dr. McCoy.
>>217269836yes, but if you like holodeck episodes voy is the series for you
>>217269836Yes indeed. The holodeck is one reason why S1 isn't as bad as some make it out to be. There's interesting stuff like that right from the start.
>>217269868>It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead, Jim;>it's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead.>It's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, not as we know it; >it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, Captain.>There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow;>there's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, Jim.>Starship Captain, James T. Kirk:
>>217269836Your journey is beginning and /trek/ will be there to help guide you.
>>217269926>Ah! We come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, shoot to kill;>we come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, men.>It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead, Jim;>it's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead.>Well, it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, not as we know it; >it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, Captain.>There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow;>there's Klingons on the starboard bow, scrape 'em off, Jim.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>On the Starship Enterprise under Captain Kirk.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>Boldly going forward, and things are getting worse!>Engine room, Mr. Scott:
>>217269904>>217269923>>217269954thanks frens
>>217269955>Ye cannae change the laws of physics, laws of physics, laws of physics;ye cannae change the laws of physics, laws of physics, Jim.>Ah! We come in peace, shoot to kill, shoot to kill, shoot to kill;>we come in peace, shoot to kill; Scotty, beam me up!>It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead, Jim;>it's worse than that, he's dead, Jim, dead, Jim, dead.>Well, it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, not as we know it; >it's life, Jim, but not as we know it, not as we know it, Captain.>There's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow, starboard bow;>there's Klingons on the starboard bow, starboard bow Jim!>Ya cannot change the strength Jim of the engines.>It's worse than that, it's physics, Jim.>Bridge to engine room, warp factor 9.>Och, if I give it any more she'll blow, Cap'n!
>wake up hungover to unfunny TOS greentext
>>217269978>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>On the Starship Enterprise under Captain Kirk.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>Boldly going forward 'cause we can't find reverse.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>On the Starship Enterprise under Captain Kirk.>Star Trekkin' across the universe,>Boldly going forward, still can't find reverse.
>wake up>resume drinking>post hilarious (to me) greentexthappy sunday /trek/!
>>217270051they shouldn't give trekpu beer.
>>217265578He's smooth like Ocho Rios sand
>>217270096if he can handle a phaser he can handle a drink
I know there are some fans who aren't happy with the new Star Trek, but personally, I think it's fantastic. The characters are complex and interesting, the visuals are stunning, and the stories are engaging. Plus, the representation in the show is amazing - it's great to see a diverse cast that reflects the real world. And as someone who grew up watching Star Trek, it's exciting to see the franchise continue to evolve and expand. I can't wait to see what they come up with next!
>>217270301And it's a lot of Fun!
>>217270301Why?
Yellow AlertShields up
>>217270301Furthermore, the production values are top-notch, with stunning visual effects, intricate world-building, and exciting action sequences that capture the essence of what makes Star Trek so special. The writing is also compelling, with intricate plotlines and nuanced character development that challenges viewers to think deeply about the moral and ethical implications of space exploration.
4 days until disaster
>>217270479For it to be a disaster people would have to care.
>>217270479I doubt if /trek/ will hold.
>>217270454
Star Trek: Starfleet Academy is a breath of fresh air for the franchise, successfully blending the grand optimism of classic Trek with the emotional depth of a modern coming-of-age story. Set in the 32nd century following the reopening of the Academy, the series captures the "prodigious start" of a new generation tasked with rebuilding a fractured galaxy.
>>217270301I like how they embrace the silliness of Star Trek. Star Trek has always been silly and ridiculous!
>>217264674How about if I meet you halfway? Before you talk of becoming the Star Trek showrunner again, how about writing a pilot script for each of these shows? You can post them on AO3; that site allows enough customization to display screenplays properly. Then we can evaluate whether you actually have the chops, or are just a blowhard high on his own farts.
ENTER YOUR COMMAND CODES AND SHUT DOWN THE PROGRAM
>>217270553It's inclusive, relevant and dynamic!
Chief Miles O'Brien
>>217267457I take it you mean STTNG's "Frame Of Mind", but where in that episode do you want the clip?
>>217269827At least post the video link! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Em-M0MOWx-A
>>217270652China O'Brienhttps://youtu.be/EgzjiSocwc8
>>217270753https://youtu.be/QaZmBFTxW9M?si=VSDeuPryU2KbQLdY
>>217270479>>217270506takes another 36-48 hours for them to get the messaging straight before they try and fail shilling here
>>217270789Christ, he looks like McMahan.
Any Star Trek episodes about being gay and Chinese?
>>217270821Can't I talk about good old fashioned Japanese racism without you dragging some unfunny bullshit into it?
>>217270872no u may not
>>217270950Leftists can't meme
>Alexander Hilary Kurtzman (born September 7, 1973) is an American filmmaker. He is best known for co-writing the scripts to Transformers (2007), Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (2009), Star Trek (2009), Star Trek Into Darkness (2013), and The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014) with his writing and producing partner Roberto Orci, and directing and co-writing The Mummy (2017). He made his directorial debut with People Like Us (2012), co-written alongside Orci and Jody Lambert.Jesus wept
>>217271026So what's the source of the demotivational crap on the left in that image? And why do you consider it Scripture?
You Fucking Cocksuckers won't even give this Star Fleet Academy show a Fucking chance! We demand that you watch it and make it Fucking successful! Are you trying to kill off our Star Trek franchise and IP!? If this show Fucking fails, we may not get another one! SNW has already finished wrapping so this has to carry forward the franchise! And quit Fucking calling it CDW in space you Assholes!
How DO you keep an old sci-fi show culturally relevant?
>>217271118>If this show Fucking fails, we may not get another one!Temporal death is better than butchering of lore and worldbuilding.
>>217271118This is obviously a false-flag post, an attempt by an oldtrek geezer to sound like a nuTrek fan. It won't work. If you have to traffic in lies to support your position, then maybe your position isn't defensible.
>>217271189Trek's so-called "lore" and "worldbuilding" is highly inconsistent. The episodes regularly take liberties with it for short-term convenience. And you know this. Why try to treat Star Trek as some sort of infallible religious faith?
>>217271155You have to accept that something like Star Trek will never be as relevant as it was during the peak of TNG. These shows will never get 10 million viewers like TNG did. The best thing to do is lean into the niche of white male nerds who went out of their way to support the franchise. Find ways to market the old shows to younger fans if you can't match their quality with brand new productions. TNG and DS9 are timeless so it's not like younger fans wouldn't be able to connect with them.
>>217271286It seems like Picard is ashamed of TNG, nobody wants to acknowledge or pay any of the old writers who worked on these old shows, but they also want to make money from the memberberry shit.
>>217271247My main beef is destruction of Romulus and ruining the Borg.>>217271286Trek could easily have Spider-Man audience if it managed to lean into Nerd Power Fantasy that is also relatable while being loyal to the original ideals.people who made Spiderman are fucking smart
>>217271286>lean into the niche of white male nerds who went out of their way to support the franchiseThat's exactly what they SHOULDN'T do, and to their credit, they're not. That fanbase is not only diminished, and diminishing more every day, but it's toxic (a fact cast into sharp relief in this general). They should do what they're doing now, which is also what they did back in 1966—try to appeal to as many potential fans as possible.>TNG and DS9 are timelessThen why were they dumped onto an "over the air" channel with a median viewer age of 62?
>>217271366>Then why were they dumped onto an "over the air" channel with a median viewer age of 62?This is super complicated issue.Star Trek was streamed on Netflix, on Paramount + etc.
>>217271366Wait, do you really not like TNG? Are you being serious?
>>217271357Were you also upset that the Klingons were allied with the Federation at the beginning of TNG? Nothing lasts forever, not even Romulus or the Borg. You may as well pine for the Soviet Union. Times change. Yours is a recipe for stagnation, and that's exactly why the current IP holders aren't doing what you want. You're not only stuck in the past, but you seem to be proud of it, which is a deadly combination for anyone who needs to run a viable business.>>217271397>super complicated issueIn other words, the answer hurts your precious little feelings, but you can't even admit that.
>>217271407>and that's exactly why the current IP holders aren't doing what you want.Bruh, Spiderman's CEOS give the audience what it wants and they earn bazillions from it.Nu-Trek is in financial hole
>>217271353The Picard show was basically saying that TNG was too "naive" and "quaint" and that their version was SO much more "realistic"
>>217271401I never said I didn't like TNG. I just implied that there's no particular reason for younger viewers to connect with that show. Even you have to admit TNG had far too much dialog in conference rooms; they didn't wear powdered wigs, but otherwise large parts of it were uncomfortably close to BBC Victorian-era drawing-room dramas. Besides, you don't like TOS, right?
>>217271407If it ain't broke don't fix it. Whatever they are doing with new Star Trek isn't making things better, it is making things superficial and cringe with more producers than actual writers.
>>217271457>there's no particular reason for younger viewers to connect with that showUhhhh...the characters?
Does NuTrek even push any merch at all?
>>217271441>Spiderman is so le heckin successfulDid you forget they practically drove the franchise into the ground, ending with "Into The Spiderverse", and only recovered starting with "Far From Home"? There's no defensible reason to hold up the Spiderman franchise as some sort of example for others to follow. Are you having selective amnesia?
>>217271485As a female sci-fi fan, which characters am I supposed to connect with on TNG? I'll wait.
>>217271449Metaphorically speaking:TOS and TNG are Superman.DS9 and Voyager are Spider-Man.Picard is Snyder’s Superman.
>>217271449>TNG was too "naive" and "quaint"Sounds like code for "doesn't appeal to younger viewers".>>217271470Trek was obviously broken. Nielsen's viewership numbers prove that.
>>217271493They went fully digital.
>>217271505Spider-Man the brand is super successful.Remember, not just movies but games, T-shirts, backpacks, etc. all generate about a billion dollars a year. People love Spider-Man because he’s relatable, but also powerful.The Amazing Spider-Man movies were shit cough Kurtzman worked on the second one cough, but they still had a large ROI.
There is now more nutrek than trek.
>>217271485>>217271516Picard? Boring old fart.Riker? Loves them and leaves them.Data? Can't be emotionally manipulated by women.Troi? Big titty space slut.Tasha Yar? Could have been a riot grrl, but got killed off quickly.LaForge? Incel nerd.Worf? One-dimensional fan of violence.So, which characters were supposed to appeal to younger viewers, and to women? I must have missed that. Please elaborate.
>>217271539DS9 got better each season, why was there such a drop?Also, per capita, Enterprise did insanely well.it was different time, computers and internet were more common.
>>217271520Can you rephrase that for people that don't watch comic-book movies?
>>217271631Crusher was such a non-character you didn't even list her...
>>217271646OUCH!
>>217271641>DS9 got better each seasonMaybe for people that want to watch a soap opera about mall cops in space. I was not one of those people. The fact remains the same—there was a drop. A big one.
are you all actually this entertained by talking to a troll who has admitted he doesn't even like Star Trek? this is so boring.
>>217271646TOS and TNG = SupermanSuperman is the classic hero.He is strong, kind, and almost always does the right thing.He believes people are good.When he wins, everything turns out okay.He saves the day and nobody important really suffers.That’s TOS and TNG.The Federation is good.Starfleet is good.The heroes do the right thing and the universe usually rewards them for it.Problems get solved without breaking their morals.The good guys win and it doesn’t really cost them anything painful.It’s hopeful and clean.DS9 and Voyager = Spider-ManSpider-Man is also a good hero with many same traits like Superman.He also believes in doing the right thing, but it usually costs him.He loses friends.He loses love.He gets blamed.He pays a personal price for being good.That’s DS9 and what Voyager wanted to be.The Federation still wants to be good.The captains still try to do the right thing.But war, danger, and hard choices mean people get hurt.Sometimes you must choose the least bad option, not a perfect one.Picard = Snyder’s SupermanSnyder’s Superman is dark and gloomy.He looks sad. The world is mean.Being a hero feels miserable.
>>217271651Crusher wasn't that interesting. She was basically the "healer" that everyone needs in their RPG campaign party, but otherwise has no purpose. Pulaski had far more personality, but she only lasted one season.>>217271657It's a genuine question. I got bored with capeshit a long time ago.
>>217271694The idea that I don't like Trek is a thinly-supported conclusion you jumped to ages ago, and never reexamined honestly. I display plenty of Trek knowledge in this general, which would be hard to explain if I wasn't a fan. The problem you have with me is that I don't treat Trek with quasi-religious reverence, and instead consider it the campy space romp it always was.
>>217271641There were a lot of reasons, but syndication really fucked with it way more than TNG because syndication dramatically changed in the 90s. Still it was successful post run and had a ton of syndicated resells but was probably one of the last successful syndicated shows.
>>217271718>Pulaski had far more personality, but she only lasted one season.I lowkey wish we had 7 seasons of Pulaski.
>>217271641DS9 got a bit too out there for casual viewers. It's great if you love worldbuilding and interconnected storylines. Not so much for casual fans who want to turn their brain off for an hour. I think DS9 eventually built a following when video on demand became more accessible.
Just a few days away from the debut of Star Trek: Starfleet Academy this Thursday. Critical reaction continues strong at 16/3.
>>217271694>a troll who has admitted he doesn't even like Star Trekqrd?
>>217271516I don't expect a woman to know anything about well written characters.
>>217271826>a young group of cadets who come together to pursue a common dream of punching the bad guy
>>217271717Sounds to me like Star Trek evolved to reflect the time in which it was produced. By pining for oldtrek, you're pining for a world that no longer exists, back when the Cold War made moral calculations simple, almost melodramatic. NATO was good, the Warsaw Pact was bad, and that was that. Then the Vietnam War happened, and the moral ambiguity of the western powers was laid bare for all to see, leading to widespread loss of faith in our institutions. TNG leaned into moral ambiguity (e.g. Klingons are allies now, Romulans can be negotiated with occasionally, even the Borg aren't all evil), but still tried to maintain that the West was the best (as epitomized by the Federation). Times have gotten much worse since then; there are no good guys that we can believe in, in our institutions. Star Trek reflects the culture, instead of quixotically trying to shape it. I'm sorry the world isn't what you want it to be, but don't blame nuTrek for revealing the truth.
>>217271793And before anyone points it out I'm talking about First-Run syndication, because yes shows like Friends and Big Bang Theory are also syndicated, but it's not the same sales model. TNG and DS9 were sold directly to local stations (often independent or smaller networks) before their original run, and that model had it's heyday during the 70s/80s but died off in the 90s.
>>217271837
>>217271858Heckin epic and quirk chungus!
>>217271837See >>217271762
>>217271876okay yeah this guy is a retard
>>217271876Which is what I said... you're butthurt because I don't treat Star Trek with quasi-religious reverence. That just means I'm not your kind of fan. But I'm still a fan. Just not the basement-dwelling kind that Shatner insulted in the infamous SNL sketch.
>>217271366You think that blurb means they were trying to get women interested?Nope. It was meant to get men interested by saying, "hey watch our show so you can learn how to be like these guys" and also the implication that there are women viewers so you might be able to talk to girls about this show
>>217271914Does that mean you can explain why a Star Trek fan necessarily has to treat it with quasi-religious reverence, and not the campy space romp it obviously is? Or are you just samefagging?
Oh man imagine thinking unfunny reddit tier shit like Lower Decks is good and then saying I am a retard for watching hard sci-fi Japanese cartoons.
>>217271923>>217271891You enjoy pretending you're smarter than TNG by performatively laughing at it and justifying it through the baseless delusion that the show is "self important." You're not a fan of Star Trek. You're a fan of fitting in to a friend group you had 40 years ago by performatively shitting on it. Learn the difference.
>>217271953You're controversial for other reasons.
>>217271941Oh, please. That's just epic cope. It literally says in the image "they are the men that women viewers are dying to meet". Your opinion is only so much head canon.
I think Bashir's recent health woes should serve as a warning for the consequences of making a bunch of people online wish you would go away forever.Something to consider, LD troon.Do not doubt the power of karmic manifestation.If you troll to the point a bunch of people fervently wish you would vanish, well... that's a hell of a thing to put out into the universe.
>>217271964Again, you're implying Star Trek fans have to treat the show with quasi-religious reverence, and you continue to avoid explaining why. It's a campy space romp, and I like it for that. And your charge of "fitting in" is only so much projection; I have never cared to do that in my entire life.
Star Trek: Lower Decks alum Tawny Newsome is getting rave reviews for her episode of Starfleet Academy S01. Tawn Tawn acknowledges she learned from a Master.
>>217271941Fujoshis are central to sci-fi on both sides of the globe. Char and Garma shippers kept 0079 on the air.
>>217272028kek what a BALD BITCH
>>217272028I would rather stab myself in the head with a screwdriver than watch this unfunny cunt and some nepo baby.
>>217271978Bashir's recent health woes? That's a character in a TV series. Do you mean Alexander Siddig's recent health woes? Like what? I couldn't find any. And what did Alexander Siddig do to piss off the terminally online, anyway?>karmic manifestationOh, please. Is this a refrain of "le hecking magic psychic powers" from https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/211838071/#p211853534? None of you have the slightest bit of spiritual awareness, and the only reason you believe you do is because you spend entirely too much time by yourself & are going schizo.
>>217272105As you wish.
>>217271953>hard sci-fi Japanese cartoons.Oh yes your horny mechas are such hard scifi
>>217272028Now this is dynamism!
>>217272072Maybe you should take it easy on the seething. You don't want to drive yourself into another round of seizures.
>>217272131Star Trek doesn't even have O'Neil cylinders it is absolute bullshit.
>>217271871Nice try, but you got the timeline slightly wrong. People were already critical of Western colonialism by the late 19th and early 20th century.The Warsaw Pact began in 1955. The first Vietnam War ran from 1946 to 1954. TOS started in 1966 in the middle of the second Vietnam War, and TNG began in 1987 after Vietnam and Watergate.NuTrek is not revealing a deeper truth. It is just poorly written. And it is being run by Alex Kurtzman, the guy behind The Mummy and Amazing Spider Man 2, not exactly a great showrunner.
>>217272124So you admit you have no basis for claiming Alexander Siddig has health issues, or that there's any reason he would have pissed off the terminally online? And trying to manifest some sort of psychic attack not only confirms you're schizo, but given the thin pretext, is very bad karma for you. Don't give yourself an aneurysm over this.
>>217272203Yes, the rumors of Siddig El Tahir El Fadil El Siddig Abderrahman Mohammed Ahmed Abdel Karim El Mahdi's impending death are greatly exaggerated.
>>217272200This has nothing to do with western colonialism. You're either really stupid, or you're deliberately missing the point.
Speaking to you once was enough. I'll go back to quietly devoting mental energy to your inevitable downfall.
>>217272241Negro, the point is that people were critical of west, and colonialism was just one specific example
>>217272048>hurr durr le baldDo you hate Patrick Stewart for the same reason? Or are you once again engaged in selective outrage? We both know the answer.
>>217272255>people were critical of westThat's not even the point of what I wrote. Yours is literally a strawman argument, and a highly ambiguous one at that.
>>217272028
>>217272250>oh noes, this anon disagrees with me about a TV show, I must commit myself to psychic warfare and ensure his downfallYou really need to tell your therapist about this. You've crossed the line into full-blown schizo. Also, given the mentality you display in this general, your mental faculties are nothing to be concerned with.
>>217272334OH NO NO NOholy fuck LOL
>>217272334kek what a bald bitch
>>217272334Why were they trying to pass off this balding 40 year old woman as a 20 something ensign?
>>217272158oh noes, you just said Star Trek is absolute bullshit! You're not a real fan! Now we'll have to post this reply of yours as an image forever, to "prove" you're not a "real" fan! REEEEEEEE
gess char
We've known BF isn't a real fan for like 12 years you retard
he's really mad he slipped up and admitted he doesn't like Star Trek and the evidence lives in the archive forever. It's so succinct to explain to newfags what his deal is by posting that one image. and he did it to himself lol
>>217272539Well, now you have your "le heckin damning" image for him. You're welcome.
>4 days til new current year TrekslopI sleep>rewatching TNG/DS9/VOY for the millionth timeI awake
everyone play Wordle today
>>217272539It's obvious this is some refugee from reddit telling us what to doHe doesn't even know who BF is
>>217272620>some refugee from redditby way of /co/, yesI would argue /co/ is even more reddit than reddit somehow
>>217272620it's not that he's from reddit he just has never earnestly engaged with this thread in his life. of course he doesn't know the tripfags.
>>217272572I'm not angry at all—I'm laughing my ass off at you. You still can't explain why anyone must treat a highly inconsistent, campy space romp like Star Trek with quasi-religious reverence. The longer you go without explaining this, the more ridiculous you look."Above all, the Devil cannot stand to be mocked." -C.S. Lewis, "The Screwtape Letters"
>>217272646>I'm not angry at allyou refer to that screenshot all the time even when no one has posted it.
>>217272661Right... because I'm mocking you. Did you really miss that? I'm obviously not misemotional about it at all.
>>217269530The 30th anniversary live special
I'm glad we saved the whales, but I hope sea lions are extinct in the future. imagine the quiet.
Another thing that sets the new Star Trek apart is the amazing cast of characters. From Michael Burnham to Saru to Pike, each of the new series has introduced us to a wide range of fascinating, multidimensional characters who we can't help but root for.Of course, the production values are also top-notch. The special effects, the set design, the music – everything comes together to create a truly immersive and cinematic experience.Overall, I think the new Star Trek series have done an incredible job of keeping the franchise relevant and exciting while also paying tribute to its rich history. I can't wait to see what they come up with next!
>>217269530Picard's segment in the Nexus?
Tillyfag is back to copypasting reddit comments I see
>>217272843One of the things I love about the new Star Trek is the way it explores modern issues through a sci-fi lens. Whether it's examining the ethics of artificial intelligence or tackling themes of diversity and inclusivity, these shows aren't afraid to take on big, complex topics.
>>217272250Oh noes, the schizo has gone quiet. I hope he didn't give himself an aneurysm with his le heckin' magic psychic powers. Because that would be, like such a deep loss for this thread and all that. Please respond, schizo anon! I care for you deeply.
>>217272869As a big Star Trek fan, I have to say that I'm really impressed with the new Star Trek series that have been released since 2017 under Alex Kurtzman's leadership. These shows have managed to capture the spirit of the original series while also bringing something fresh and exciting to the franchise.
>>217272843>–
>>217272857I think they are making them in AI which is somehow even sadder.
>>217272857It's 2017 all over again. It shouldn't have to be this way.
>>217272969You were in a lot of the original Discord /trek/ servers. What happened that turned them into mentally ill weirdos who use /trek/ as their battlefield?
I would like to open up this question to the entire thread, not just the one seether. Can ANYONE explain why anyone must treat a highly inconsistent, campy space romp like Star Trek with quasi-religious reverence?
>>217273054You've already been given a proper response.
>>217273039The fact that I left.
Overall, the new Star Trek series represent a bold step forward for the franchise, and its commitment to inclusivity, diversity, and innovation make it an excellent addition to the canon.
>>217273107hese new Star Trek series have brought a fresh take on the iconic franchise, injecting new life into the beloved universe. The shows have embraced diverse storytelling, featuring complex characters with different backgrounds, races, and sexual orientations, allowing audiences to see themselves reflected on screen.
I would like to open up this question to the entire thread, not just the one seether. Can ANYONE explain why anyone must treat a highly inconsistent, campy furry romp like Sonic The Hedgehog with quasi-religious reverence?
>>217273094As I said above >>217271871, by pining for oldtrek, you're pining for a world that no longer exists. The times have passed you by, and you are unable or unwilling to adapt. I suppose you'd also cheer the Japanese "holdouts" that continued to fight WWII decades after Japan surrendered?
>>217273094Pic is not wrong.Imagine Rick and Morty type series set in LOTR universe.Even the freaking pre-Guardians MCU was more restrained than post Guardians and Deadpool, and box office speaks for itself
>>217273165refusing to lose is the most star trek thing you can do.
>>217273172The pic merely asserts that Star Trek has to be taken seriously without explaining why, nor does it confront the obvious truth that it's a campy space romp.
>>217273222Look around the hovel you live in. You've already lost. You're the least "Star Trek" person in the world.
>>217272843>the set design,Every promotional image so far looks like it was shot inside a pinball machine or an air fryer.
It doesn't say that Star Trek has to be taken seriously, but that Star Trek should take ITSELF seriously. But your lead poisoned boomer brain doesn't understand.
>>217273229>The pic merely asserts that Star Trek has to be taken seriously without explaining why
>>217273274Hey can you please shut the fuck up and stop feeding the troll please? thanksdumb fuck
>>217273222And then he was killed by Soran and a rock.
>>217273257its not only that it looks bad. it doesnt make any sense for everything to be bright and uncomfortable in the future. everything we know about humanity says they will continue enjoying the comfort of soft lighting and soft surfaces that soften sounds
>>217273290it's not like he's ever gonna go away
>>217273274But Star Trek DIDN'T take itself seriously—it was a campy space romp. Any claims that Star Trek took itself seriously are necessarily due to selective memory.
>>217273274Yeah. All the highest rated movies and series on IMDB take themselves seriously.imagine 'he's right behind me, isn't he' joke in LoTR or Dark Knight
>>217273319that was just picards nexus fantasy. kirk is still cooking breakfast and banging antonia.
>>217273281Most boring meme image ever, AND still no explanation for why Star Trek has to be taken seriously. I accept your concession.
>>217273364Star Trek, TOS was always uneven, but mostly took itself seriously.TNG and DS9 took themselves mostly seriously.
>>217273364read a star trek history book sometime, retard. believability is why star trek works. gene was a hardass about it and everyone bought in.
>>217273368"The Mandalorian" is highly rated on IMDB, yet it was almost entirely "and then, the Mandalorian appeared BEHIND the person who was looking for him! AGAIN!"
Lost in Space (60s) was a show that did not take itself seriously.Star Trek set out to be the opposite of that.
>>217273362ignoring him is literally the only thing that works but there is always a retard like you ITT that can't resist a 3 hour nah-you-are with this guy
>>217273433lost in space stole a lot of ideas from gene
>talking about verisimilitude with faggots who have never even read DFW>talking about retro-futuristic sets with idiots who have never even seen FallingwaterYou guys are uneducated and love anal sex.
>>217273407>u must read a book about Star TrekOh, please. I struggle to remember hearing a more pathetic request in my life. Let me guess... I'm not a "real" fan if I don't? FYI, I'm presently reading the "Out Of The Silent Planet" trilogy by C.S. Lewis, which is far more utopian than Star Trek, without any of the obsessive fans with clothyard shafts shoved firmly up their asses. Let me guess... if I consume any media besides Star Trek, that makes me not a "real" fan too, right?
>>217273409Sheeeeeet, was meme magic with baby Grogu so high that Mandalorian has even 8.6?That's lighting in a bottle. I doubt it can be replicated
>>217273493I got a novel for ya.
>>217273409The Book of Boba Fett , Star Wars: The Acolyte and Obi Wan series also wanted to succeed from nostalgia but failed.Baby Yoda is unique type of nostalgia. It's both new and nostalgic.
>>217273498So your position is that its popularity was Grogu meme magic, not taking itself seriously?
>>217273437You can try and tell them but it won't work—they're too interested in "owning" me but I'm just telling the truth about Star Trek and how it shouldn't be treated with quasi-religious reverence.You're all idiots and you dance to the beat of my drum! Reply to me more, please!
>>217273541>>217273553Why are we talking SW?
>>217273553Yes, every rule has an exception. Aside from The Mandalorian, what other highly rated TV series on IMDb don’t take themselves too seriously?
>talking about Star Wars in /trek/Really? REALLY?
>>217273364Star Trek needs a high episode count so the goofy, unserious episodes don't get in the way of the poignant and thematic ones. The Royale and Measure of Man aired just weeks apart from each other. You can't do that in a 10 episode season without ruining the tone.
>>217273574Again, Baby Groku carried Mandalorian. Without it, it would have 7.2 on IMDB. Same how other series apart Andor
>>217273639meant for>>217273553
>>217273574You aren't smart enough to have this conversation with me.
>>217273407"believability"Warp Drive, Galactic Empires, Alien Sex Babies, Time Travel.Trek was always a Tits and Rayguns space opera. Despite protests of "this is real social community guys!" protests to the contrary.Have fun, enjoy the ride but don't take Trek too seriously. It's just television.
>>217264912Lower Decks is more entertaining than Enterprise
if there's anyone religiously revering a tv show it's this fag with Lower Decks where he literally has to go out and proselytize and harass people with his religion in places he's not wanted and where no one cares
>>217273688Comparing Andorians to Organians. LOW was a Canon series. ENT was a badly written Holonovel.
>>217273687>Warp Drive, Galactic Empires, Alien Sex Babies, Time Travel.Immersion is hard to define, but both the Arkham games and The Lord of the Rings show how a sincere, logical tone and strong presentation can make even very unrealistic worlds feel believable through suspension of disbelief.
At least the characters in ENT arent qurikin chungus pick me females.
>>217273687So anyway, tone is important for immersion. Wing wing jokes ruin immersion, and thus suspension of disbelief and thus emotional investment.Guess why Endgame is already forgotten xD
>>217273810wink*
>>217273790As much as I would like to agree with you, you think TOS is shit so your opinion is worth about as much as the Toonophile's at the end of the day.
"Nobody jokes around at school, work and especially not in the Military!"The odd things NEETs insist upon.
>>217273861jokes and tone are different things.
>>217273729I've made this comparison before that Toonfags are like door to door Jehova's witnesses
"The Tone at school, work and especially in the Military is always serious."Nope. Not correct either.
>>217273858All I am saying is that there is a difference between writing a Mary Sue manic pixie dream girl and somebody who convincingly has BPD.
>anon is autistic and does 'well, that just happened' jokes IRL
>>217274008
Best Version of DS9 to pirate?
>>217274265vertag upscale. pic is an screenshot
>>217274447why is alien design in Trek so bad, bros?
>>217274447its about the writing and acting, dumbass.
>>217273943don't you have the beepers, beefers? What's it like?
>>217274447That actually looks better than the DVD sets Paramount is charging $100 for. Why couldn't they have used that master for a Blu-Ray?
>>217274673i dunno but I'm so glad I found this one. the other AI upscales I downloade were unwatchable garbage. I don't know why this one is different but it looks lovely and the only time you see anything weird is if there's text on screen or like, weird patterns when they're on the sand planet
I'm not sure I have the stomach to watch Academy.
>>217274467You mean absolutely GOAT'd by Michael Westmore the goddamn GOAT? I don't know, man.If you realize he's working within the "you still have to show the actor's face so they can emote" framework that is a hard fast Roddenberry/Berman Trek rule, he literally works miracles. Cardies are one of his best designs too.
>>217274760I haven't forced myself to watch any nutrek since 2020
A groundbreaking show, Star Trek Academy takes the franchise in a whole new direction that had some fans worried but now that we have grown to know and love the characters, the statement the show makes is becoming more and more profound.
Going forward, Star Trek Academy is exploring a side of the Federation and the Star Trek universethat was left largely untouched by earlier iterations. How they face the aftermath of the Burnand how they deal with Jay-Den's fledgling latent is a really exciting premise.
"Dude I almost had you!"
btw if you need confirmation 229/Tillyfag is in the thread and participates in the spamming>>217272512
>>217274936I think the new phase of Star Trek shows has been great and STA is a continuation of that. The production value is incredible, the cast is diverse and talented, and the storytelling is more nuanced and character-driven than ever before. The new series has managed to honor the legacy of the original while also pushing the franchise in new and exciting directions. I can't wait to see what the future holds for Star Trek.
It's time for /trek/ to end if it's gonna be like this.
Also we've reached the point in the thread where they're going to try to spam it to the bump limit and steal an OP to advertise their new show
>>217274991/trek/ has withstood a lot. Remember the LD wars?
>>217275007Yes, And the victor was no else but the Dubsminion
>>217275020Shut up, Weyoun
"So then I says to Mabel, I says..."
>>217275043female jem'hadar?
>>217275043looks like shit
>>217275043NuTrek is so visually generic
>>217275063Fat Jem'Hadar
>>217275043Why are all the sets so uninviting and sterile?
>>217275043fat bitch
>>217275028No
>>217274997"Nasty Baggins wants to steal my Op. My preciousssss."
>>217275071Forgettable yet off-putting.
>>217275043So this is where all the Ketracel-white come from
>>217275043Look at their fucking bootsOH NO NO NO
>>217275192https://youtu.be/Qx0huz6TiLo
>>217271026>>217273257>>217274967>>217275043>>217275120Jan 15th is my birthday and this is what they're giving me? Even I deserve better
>>217275105step aside
>>217275359What Alien species is she?
>>217275378homogenized hologram or something
>>217272158Humans in Star Trek nearly completely bypass spin gravity for starship and station design. If you can crack subspace field theory and invent the warp drive there's simply no need for it and it would be more of a hinderance than anything.
>>217275007I was rooting for the Prodigy fans during that
>>217275238Who cares that you're older
Imagine watching this shitty CW Academy show when Frieren Season 2 comes out.
>>217275486PROD was less divisive.
>>217275359>>217275378
>>217275238Ah! There you are! I’ve been looking all over the ship for you. Do you know what today is? Of course you do — it’s your special day! Now, I’ve prepared a little something in the Mess Hall. Nothing too extravagant… well, actually, it might be a little extravagant, but only because you deserve it crewman!
>>217275619Sounds delicious.
>>217275597Bash, please.
/trek/ sucks so much anymore because the fans here can't agree on what parts of the franchise are good and why.
>>217275715The fans agree. The trolls do not.
>>217275715What do you propose we do?
>>217275715People can have different opinions, idk. I'm okay with snw pro and ld but can see why others wouldn't. I think voy and ENT are trash but don't care if people like it. I think most of DS9 is overrated but liked it enough to make the sloperaIt's just a TV show I should really just relax for mystery science theater 3000
>>217275754Well given that you're one of the shills/trolls, I think you should probably be whipped out of the thread like the yellow bellied weasel you are.
>>217275192"I mean are we supposed to believe they wear boots 1000 years in the future? I sure hope somebody got fired for that boner!*
>>217275754Drive the retarded new Star Trek fans out with autism and blind hatred.
>>217275772The Dukat Opera anon is not a Nu Trek tranny, please do not defame him
>>217275772Can you take your horrible taste and fuck off?
new>>217275841>>217275841
Sloperanon has said he's a SNW watcher before
>>217275877
>>217274767Jesus Christ, how many silly rules did Roddenberry had?Cardassians look fine. Dinosaur people. Jem'Hadar are also warrior dinosaur humanoids, but Vorta look terrible.
>>217275962the entire point of the Vorta design was that there shouldn't be anything on the face
>>217275962The only sci-fi show to not follow that rule is Farscape, even Babylon 5 gives most of its aliens a clear face so they actor can emote properly
>>217275772>I should really just relaxNuMST3K is total shit too. And its defenders have retconned "I should really just relax" - just a jokey, throwaway line acknowledging that the premise is really just an excuse to have some guys forced to watch bad movies - to mean: "You should just shut up and enjoy the [now unfunny, woke and theatre-kidsy] show." Which is ironic, since the whole point of the show was to heckle/take the piss out of poorly made shit.
>>217273559Blame >>217269530>>217273574>This rule applies to all of IMDB, except when it doesn'tWell thought out argument there. No wonder you're taken so seriously, around here as well as in your life.
>>217273526No thanks, I don't read cringe.
>>217273586So you admit Star Trek has a mix of serious episodes and goofy episodes. So why do you focus on the serious episodes, ignore the goofy episodes, and thus pretend the show is serious and deserves to be taken seriously? You have selective attention.
>>217276255But what are your thoughts on Mariner in a diaper? Or Tendi?
