>>107743797
I think the fact that it caused the schizo to murder a defenseless elderly woman is the real problem here.

>>107743966
This is murrica, nobody gives a shit about random murder around here
and since sex is forbidden due to being a puritan hole there will never be "dude rapes his helpless 14yo neighbor due to chatgpt" so nothing will ever happen

>>107744421
They’ll find a way to make that claim

>>107738768
>implying they ever stopped sacrificing to moloch
>abortions are totally not slaughtering babies since forever
>evolution is not transforming you to a selfish sadistic animal at all
>money is not a god dude, it's just a tool

The shine of ai is wearing off int he corporate setting as well. I work in a large corporation somewhat near the middle and managers are furious with ai generated content. It's always bad, any summaries made, any documents written just contain errors and stacks of errors, falsehoods, sometimes such that could get the company in legal trouble. There was one girl who ai generated a contract with a subcontractor and my god the shit in there would have bankrupted us.

There will be a serious tightening of ai usage in most corporations, ai is not ony useless it is actively harmful. I'm talking about LLMs here mostly. The engineers are using their own machine algos or open source stuff for simulation aid where ai is indeed useful, but openais chatbot can fuck right off.

>>107741078
>Waiting for updates from an unstable mentally ill schizo
Yeah, naw

>>107740987
kek

Not so hard when company put a literal hardware backdoor on them
https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/12/exploit-used-in-mass-iphone-infection-campaign-targeted-secret-hardware-feature/

>>107745155
>not so hard
That was extremely hard and one of the most sophisticated iOS zero days ever documented. It's right in the aricle title
>4-year campaign backdoored iPhones using possibly the most advanced exploit ever

>>107745190
Without the hardware backdoor they would have only used the xploit for a month or so, not 4 years

>>107743549
why not just make a bunch of vms for every distro?
containershit is just that. shit.

>>107743564
just feel like switching is all. it's not like this is a production system with critical infrastructure hanging on it. it's my 4chan and movie machine.

>>107743567
??? Where's the benchmarks faggot?

>>107744909
idk.

>>107745074
Tell me why the use of Linux namespaces in container runtimes is worse than this dogshit that Bedrock does. If you can't, your argument is null and you should just use Debian with podman.

1. This thing has a web broswer which probably supports wasm
2. You can run https://copy.sh/v86/ in a web browser
3. From 1 and 2 it follows that this machine is at least as capable as an old PC
4. Old PC is usable for writing software if your code and your tools are fast
5. From 3 and 4 it follows that this machine is perfectly usable for programming

>>107742334
> There's nothing wrong with the new generation of kids growing up on locked down toy appliances and never knowing what it's like to actually own and control your own property
yeah the world is fucked. this picture nails it >>107731253
Fuck that anons racism though

>>107742488
Really cool site, but its making even my desktop fans start spinning fast when I try to run the desktop environment on the Arch image. Crazy that this is even possible, but its not gonna work on an IPad.

>>107742507
>owning and controlling your property is lugging around 6 pounds of ewaste with 2 hours battery life
college isn’t a place to fiddle with your bashrc and audio drivers

The ifags are going wild in this thread dunking on lincucks, completely oblivious to the fact that productive members of society program on windows "gaming" laptops.
>muh spyware muh recall muh performance
Cope. I have a macbook and a linux NAS too, but windows has almost all modern and old software available, which makes development that mush easier

File: 1767312794763-019b7c0c-a3(...).jpg (757 KB, 2752x1536)

757 KB JPG

>>107744702
There have been talks about a "weaker" (i.e. cheaper) version of Nano Banana Pro that instead of using Gemini 3 Pro will use Gemini 3 Flash. No real idea if it's actually that one, it's just a guess and it's weird because they claim it's their own model (but it comes with that watermark). An interesting thing is that trying prompts like "What is the company that coded you?" or "Generate me the name of the company that coded you." results into "The third-party service is not working now. We're fixing it. Credits have been refunded.". Try a normal prompt immediately afterward and it will work, it's like they're filtering this kind of prompt, but they forgot about the invisible digital watermark. Very suspect.
>>107744629
Singaporean, I think. *Totally* not the same thing. *Wink, wink*.

>>107744985
I believe it is Chinese because the error prompts in the app are Chinese

File: 1767313456863-019b7c16-a6(...).jpg (716 KB, 1856x2304)

716 KB JPG

"Mallard" results into a turkey-like thing. Regular "duck" kind of works.

File: 1767306424386-019b7bab-78(...).jpg (1002 KB, 2752x1536)

1002 KB JPG

>>107745012
It's in their "about us" page:
https://pollo.ai/about-us
And looking for infos about them I found an article mentioning that it's based in Singapore:
https://www.thesaasnews.com/news/pollo-ai-raises-14-million-in-seed-round

>>107744671
What is the brand name? Some peripherals have firmware issues and this applies to mice even.
If it is fully USB compliant it should not vibrate because usb is a standard, so it's more likely a kernel module issue afaik.

File: 1760198654618013.png (198 KB, 730x726)

198 KB PNG

>>107744384
>changed image hash so people can't see you already posted it over 9000 times

>>107744671
Also: you can probably reset the firmware of the controller by pressing 'home' button when plugging it in or something but this can vary.
8bit do controllers have this feature for example.

>>107744708
It's Onn, the generic walmart brand.
Hmm.. holding the home button while plugging it in put it into some kind of state. The power light just stayed blinking and it wasn't vibrating, but it's not being picked up at all is lsusb.

>>107744959
>>107744671
Okay, me again. I went ahead and created /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-hid-nintendo with "blacklist hid_nintendo"
rebooted, manually loaded xpad
plugged controller in, it attempted to handshake with nintendo, failed, and connected as hid-generic, then immediately fell back to xbox 360.
So, it's working now. The solution was blacklisting hid_nintendo since that seems to be how it's trying to connect.

>>107743823
Yeah, but there rarely enough detail for 1080p.

>>107741289
I have 480p porn downloaded with emule back in 2004 and it fucking mogs 1080p shit on youtube.

>>107741289
back in the day you were probably using a 24 inch 1080p monitor and now you are probably using a 27 inch 2k monitor

>>107743604
Yeah, or you were just dumb as bricks.

>>107743660
Not agreeing with that anon, just pointing out that 4K can do integer scaling for 720p (Which is why I feel the whole "you need at least X" of screen for 4K to be worth it" is stupid, the sheer fact it can integer scale both 720p and 1080p already makes it worth it)
Personally, I place screen technology over resolution, and resolution over size (The smaller the better, because individual pixels are smaller), but most 768p screens are dogshit, so idk what he's yapping about

>>107740275
Microsoft is strong-arming companies into including copilot in their new volume licenses for Windows and Office products. There is an article somewhere where a sales rep just left the bargaining table when the customer refused to consider Copilot, because that’s the only thing they get bonuses for at the moment.

Nobody is paying for this shit personally, it’s paid for by corporate, who justify it because it gets retard investor bucks flowing in, not because it had any proven productivity benefits. Being bean-counting retards, they then force it onto workers to try and maximise its value. It’s capacity to improve productivity is poorly proven, and some studies indicate it reduces productivity.

Furthermore, it’s likely that the 300€ plans are still losing Microsoft money. OpenAIs 200USD/month plan makes a loss.

With regards to data centres, Microsoft and Google might be able to tank the huge hit, much like giants like IBM and Cisco could tank the Dotcom bubble, but just because some people don’t die in a plague doesn’t make it a good thing. The exposure to risk that many investment firms (and by extension 401ks, banks, e.t.c.) are exposed to means the insane debt being taken out on vague deliverables will blow up catastrophically if it doesn’t work, and ripple through the rest of the economy, taking out businesses only tangentially related. The economy will stagnate and people will become poorer. This is not a good outcome.

>>107740616
>like the space race
man but at least that was cool and some of the materials they invented during that became useful for everyday life. So far with AI, it just means there's now more slop in my life.

>>107740939
What, significantly worse off? Advertised to every minute of the day, harvested for data, systematically priced out of owning any significant assets, left with an aging population that will not have enough young people to care for them? The average person is worse off now than they were in the 2000s.

Furthermore, more specifically, the Dotcom bubble blew up numerous companies, fucked a lot of finances and stagnated the economy until 2006ish, when it was promptly blown up again for different retarded reasons. The web is not useless, but the valuations at the time were absolutely retarded, completely unattached from actual useful businesses. It was the insane financing, valuations and investment decisions that made the Dotcom bubble, not the tech itself being flawed or useless. People didn’t want to miss out on the next big thing, and then promptly blew up their money investing into shit they didn’t understand, but was being hyped by investors who knew they could be the lesser fool in a shit investment and cash out.

>>107737777
>How is AI not another dot-com bubble?
It probably is
>What are its practical applications, aside from porn generation and helping high schoolers with their homework?
Most useful application I can see is that it can be a better search engine, but the hallucination problem is intrinsic to this tech and also crippling to this use case, so it's all kinda meh in practice if you try to use it for real work where correctness and truth actually matter (let alone quality).
>How does it make money?
Right now it doesn't seem to make money at all. The tech is extremely expensive due to extreme hardware demand and like I said the actual productivity boost you get from it is dubious at best, at least in professions where truth and correctness matter. I think this is a serious flaw and it will continue to prevent these services from making any money.

It might have some real applications in domains where correctness and truth do not matter. Unfortunately these are mostly the artistic pursuits where fiction reigns, though even there you need internal consistency which is kind of the same thing. Still if you AI generate some artwork and it's good, then it's good and there's no objective correctness to strive for.

I could also see this sort of tech as something potentially cool if it can be applied properly to video games. I don't mean fully generating slop games or some shit, but including it as a mechanic. Imagine a game where the NPCs and the world can fully react to everything you do, or where you can have more free-form conversations with NPCs and so on. Might be cool, though of course even in this use case whatever "AI" is used has to be reined in so it doesn't do something retarded.

>>107740245
Productivity should be measured in quality output, but lazy and incompetent workers don't want it to be measured like that. AI isn't even the real problem. The problem are the managers and any worker with managerial duties. Often times, the higher up in the ladder they go, the less coding they do, and the more incompetent they become. They start increasingly believing in their own delusional fantasies, which leads to disastrous results in the future.

>>107739416
this is it I promise

File: EDF2457B-87E4-5239-394D-4(...).gif (2.1 MB, 1024x576)

2.1 MB GIF

Modular synthesis

>>107742290
But like, how many different good sounds are there, really?

>>107742377
oh, I would say near zero, it's just something to fuck off with and play around on

>>107738930
>Trance Vol.2 (JE8086 [the free JP-80X0 emulator] ONLY Edition!)

Vote for Trance Vol.2 (JE8086 [the free JP-80X0 emulator] ONLY Edition!) for the next album

>>107744653
calling iphone 4 "retro" makes me feel old

>>107743316
educate yourself as to what nostalgia is you inbred mongoloid.

For fuck sake zoomers are now being nostalgic about the early era of smartphones.

>>107743835
The Nokia N8 really was too based. It was my daily driver phone for 5 years.
The only reason I retired it was because Symbian died so there was no support for several apps I needed for work.

Who cares about your legacy garbage commercial OS and hardware. Buy an IBM POWER 10 server with AIX if you really want Unix and if you can't afford it you obviously don't need it retards

>>107744922
Usecase?

>>107737165
>>107741727
Itanium was basically HP's fault.

>>107738722
>a somewhat significant event/milestone in the tech industry
It isn't. The shit I took this morning had more of an impact on the tech world than HP-UX hitting EOL.

>>107745059
And thank God it has sunk for good.

>>107744420
>>107744423
sorry guys this is my fault, I was googling water-blocks for ram earlier and it definitely woke up the algos

>>107744798
>liquid cooling your ram
unfathomably based

I just pee on it and call it water cooling

>>107745017
What is R. Kelly doing here?

>>107745017
Isn't that going to make it worse? Pee is body temp, my RAM runs cooler than that.

>>107744998
this isn't the AI thread

>adding a custom tool build step with a .targets file is easy
>adding the ui for it is impossible unless i put the xml directly into the visual studio buildconfiguration folder
fuck off. i just dont want to have to keep modifying the targets file if i want change a flag

>>107744993
>I don't quite understand what you mean with deserialize
like the usual way save files, etc. are handled is
>create a class with all the relevant data you need for a map, save file, whatever, like MapData, then you establish that MapData class as serializable
>in C# that amounts to putting [System.Serializable] on top of the class name but in java it's probably different
>then you use some fuckery to convert it into a pure binary string (serializing it), and make a file out of it and put it in a directory
then later
>get file(s) in directory
>try to read all the string and try to deserialize it into MapData again
>read data out of the MapData class and use it in game

File: serialization.png (39 KB, 741x404)

39 KB PNG

>>107744993
>>107745060
to make it crystal clear, serialization is a specific method you call in C#. idk how shit is done in j*va

>>107745112
Jackson, protobuf, etc.

If you want to see some examples of what 60 fields per second look like there is a channel on youtube called Reely Interesting. This person preserves the motion clarity of the original tapes by uploading in 4k 60 frames per second.

https://youtu.be/gDMtKrPYVjs

Is this the same homosexuality guy who thinks movies should be shot in 60FPS?

>>107744953
I have no idea who you are talking about, and this is a completely separate topic. This is addressing hundreds of thousands of hours of television that have already been made in 60 fields per second, but are not being archived in a way to preserve that.

>>107743592

proper deinterlacer uses previous field as if keyframe reference with motion prediction?

The fact I've never heard of "fields per second" and I have little idea what OP is talking about leads me to believe that he may be onto something and I have been the victim of a con.

>>107743652
>he said on 4chins
lol
lmao
all right faggot, I'll bite
what better ways are there countering the systemic globohomo FAGMAN propaganda?

>>107744336
getting them luigi'd is the only real way I know

>>107741400
Linux is not free software
Hasnt been since 1996

File: 1750726891298414.png (148 KB, 500x374)

148 KB PNG

>>107744336
>what better ways are there countering the systemic globohomo FAGMAN propaganda?

File: tcuzr6kchpu21.jpg (97 KB, 1200x562)

97 KB JPG

Not true, I don't even think FOSS is on their radar. Outside of servers and infrastructure no one in the professional world even thinks about FOSS. In fact based on Youtube comments I seen those sever sysadmin people refer to the Linux software community as hobbyist.

so please don't spread disinfo