WTF guys I thought school prestige didn't matter?
>>107835255Wow, peak retardation to hire Chinese for the presumably cutting edge of tech.Not that I believe in Altman's scam, but you know the Peking guys are stealing what they can and sending it to the Motherland.
What's the engineering equivalent of a stunt cock? Someone who appears as a "double" when actual tech questions need to be answered. I'm fairly sure Sam Altman doesn't know shit and there's someone else put into his place at tech-based interviews.
>>107835527>cutting edge of techyes, they are launching a pen soon, I believe.what a time to be alive.
>>107835255>WTF guys I thought school prestige didn't matter?I'm sure the more important question is where did OpenAi employees go to synagogue
>>107835306Maybe a german made that chart, we still call it Peking.
how true is this
>>107824879its technically true, the week before thanksgiving and probably during SC25, they all got together and exchanged circular LTS agreements, locking up all RAM capacity. this also happened with NVME, but it is taking longer for its affect to hit the market, i assume because there are more than 3 manufacturers
>>107835611hwhite dudes who can't accept they're mid and it's actually their own fault they are stuck where they are
>>107824901it is 100% truesource: every previous bubble including dotcomThis bubble is particularly intense though because the elites are convinced that AI is absolutely necessary for them to attain immortality and snub God, so they will spare no expense this time.
>>107824879This is literally not figuratively and not conceptually, but just fucking Enron 2.0 only difference being instead of one company it's an entire fucking branch of industry.
>>107825426Other Anon is correct, bank reserve ratios were set to $0 during Covid and were never brought back, mainly because every bank immediately overshot the old reserve ratio threshold once it was removed and if it were to be reinstated every bank would immediately go upside down as a result.Every big bank right now is operating with no reserve and no backup so be careful where you put your money.
Emmanuele Bassi makes the best software. Prove me wrong.
>>107827576can we finally bully every gnome dev off the internet?
>>107828207Link?
>>107827576GNOME's design dictatorship breaks extensions with every update, enforces a rigid workflow many hate, and uses more resources than leaner alternatives. "Best" is subjective, but its flaws are objective. Bassi's code is clean; the UX is contentious.
>>107832791JAV code?
look what I found, you can make native GTK apps for GNOME in React now. GG WPhttps://github.com/eugeniodepalo/gtkx
THE CREATOR OF LINUX ADMITTED TO VIBE-CODING
>>107831372What's the copium faggots will use to tell you AI is just a bubble?
>>107831512NOOOO TRUST THE EXPERTS!!! Castrated brain.
>>107834471So it failed to follow the no arithmetic rule for adding the evens and odds? Okay, I guess that counts for arithmetic. What's the correct solution then? You can't propose a new sequence without knowing its sum. You can only deduce that although Jane's meets the criteria Bob then must be thinking of a different set of primes.
>>107834846>So it failed to follow the no arithmetic rule for adding the evens and odds?No, I'm saying it most likely found the triplet you did by iterating over the possibilities and testing them against the conditions (while ignoring the instructions) and then rationalized it with nonsense.>You can only deduce that although Jane's meets the criteria Bob then must be thinking of a different set of primes.Correct and that's literally all the prompt asks you to do.
>>107833014Oh, it's you. Again, you should try using the state-of-the-art models instead of the OpenSlopAI ones.
What was the most disturbing thing you've found on the dark web?
>>107793367kys
>>107816593People want to do it with dignity and surrounded by family. You're not gonna throw yourself in front of a train with your family waving you goodbye.
>>107802048Very grim piechart, that shit belongs on the dark web
>>107814636>but there's never been any evidence of any such videos being made for profit.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/764_(organization)Can be done as a kind of rite of initiation. Money I'm pretty sure has also passed hands for clips like that.
What cybersecurity service would many people pay for, or what service would a small number of wealthy people pay for?
>>107834490Do you take pride in not trying? I'm not saying I'll definitely become a millionaire, but it won't happen if I don't try.
>>107834430>people pay forLiterally nothingPeople refuse to pay. Its why ads are the only real way to make money>small number of wealthy people pay for?Good luck.
>>107834560There's a billion retards that can cobble up trash in a matter of hours. Do you think you're special? You're so unremarkable and unoriginal that you're trying to outsource even the easiest part - the idea.Rich cunts don't want anything made and maintained by a single person. You don't have the capacity to offer support and you don't have resources to get access some kind of specialized resources that would offer something others can't and distinguish your product from the competition. They will always go with a 24/7 support service from an established tested source. Maybe try to have an even narrower potential client base? Write something for bezos alone, I'm sure that's gonna work out. >cs in anno domini 9/11+25
>>107834430make a react wrapper around some basic CLI tools for OSINT goons that dont want to use commandline.
>>107835213Then what do you do other than trying to make your way up the corporate ladder?>>107835434>You're so unremarkable and unoriginal that you're trying to outsource even the easiest part - the idea.Original ideas often fail because markets reward familiarity and scalability. Novelty doesn't pay.>They will always go with a 24/7 support service from an established tested sourceyou could have said that from the start.>Maybe try to have an even narrower potential client base? Write something for bezos alone, I'm sure that's gonna work out.If you don't want to spoonfeed then why'd you take the time to post? It's almost like you have a child’s understanding of reality due to a stunted growth induced by learning everything about the world from cartoon characters and obese aging hag middle school teachers telling you that you won't make it big in life if you don't get good grades.I don't know if this is deliberate (trolling) or not, but if it's the latter, then you're a mind rape victim and a bottom barrel scraping mollusk that subsides on the leftovers and shitstains of your better priors. Your entire existence is painted in half assed stale regurgitation. Dont lecture me on anything you fucking worm.
>The best text editorWhy did Kate won?
>>107834448/<thing I want to find>\gg <grep for it in the whole project>\gf <fuzzy find in document, no gf>
>>107834448It has, default keybind is CTRL + SHIFT + PYou can remap it according to your liking.>win programmerBest you’ll get as far proper debugging capabilities and more is Visual Studio + VsVim extension
>>107833620based
vim is absolutely retarded. you'd think a terminal app could open a 20 gig file but nope, it loads the entire thing into memory instead of maintaining a buffer with only the lines you see loaded. most editors crap themselves at this.
>>107834970>It has, default keybind is CTRL + SHIFT + PThanks for this anon, I never knew it was capable of that. The shortcut I had to use was Ctrl+Shift+F though.From what I can tell you can't seem to search within the results, like you can with N++, however. There's an option to show the results in another tab, but Kate doesn't seem to allow you to do any search within that new tab.Not a huge dealbreaker, but in a work scenario being able to search within the results is incredibly useful for parsing error logs.
How do nat and masquerade work in nftables?When and why and how to use them? I fail to understand no matter how I ask llms to try different words or simpler explanations.
>>107601582"The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it."--George Orwell>CyberpunkThe FAQ: https://sizeof.cat/post/cyberpunk-faq/What is /cyb/erpunk?: https://pastebin.com/pmn9vzWZHow do I into /cyb/erpunk?: https://pastebin.com/5tpNFQdsHuge list of cyberpunk media: https://sizeof.cat/post/cyberpunk/The cyberdeck: https://pastebin.com/7fE4BVBgCyberlife: https://jinteki.industries/files/cyberlife.7zBibliothek: https://www.mediafire.com/folder/4m5hd2065hde8/Bibliothek>PrivacyTools: https://www.privacyguides.org/en/tools/Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>107829521>What are people even into these days?Like the other anon said, hardware sucks right now because it's too expensive, even cheap shit is too expensive and unjustifiable compared to just emulating it AI + /cyb/sec/pri/ is a lot of fun especially if you're a skid about the /sec/ stuff. Doing barely-illegal stuff like scanning ports and accessing LLMs hosted across the world is coolThere's also a ton of vulnerabilities and bug bounties for all these AI systems so if you're a kool kid you can look into those
>>107830008>nah I ended up vibe coding my ownFTFY
Good thing you don't use instagram, right anon?>>107826729
>>107833303kek
>>107833303Yeah and that's the good part
Software is so gay and effeminate I regret so much not getting into hardware and electronics, that's where the cool stuff really happens (or should happen)
>>107834816Hardware is ware it's at.High school students with Lego technic mog these guys so hard too just watch any 2010s competition
>first programmer was a woman>second was a faggotyeah, the writing was on the wall
what kind of hardware? unfortunate that the big bucks is just wasting your life so effeminate web shit can run their dogshit code or adult daycare (vidya)
>>107834816Oh god, those robots aren't ready for market! We really need to listen to Sam Altman and give him all our money and RAM so we can solve all problems and things will be good.
I'm not a computer expert, but can't you just have a smart home made of smart devices that connect to a local network server that's within your own home and does not connect to the Internet and cannot be accessed / controlled from outside your home network? Is that really so difficult to program? Why must everything connect to the Internet?
>>107833958Yes but that's not what they want.They want surveillance capitalism, otherwise they would have provided a local option.
>>107833958Yes, it's possible and ideal for privacy. But companies push cloud connections for subscriptions, data, and ease of use. A local system needs a dedicated hub, technical setup, and limits "control from anywhere" convenience.
>>107833958Yeah it's called home assistant
>>107833958>Okay Google, make me a kebab sandwhich
>>107833958Yes, you can.No, it's not difficult.Because requiring a subscription is more profitable, and normies are retarded enough to fall for it.
SAY HIS NAME
>>107833295Birruaino
>>107833456He's a big guy
>>107833295I like the reflection of his fat mom's in the doorframe
>>107833295
>>107833295>no biological or nerve agent protectionngmi
They should replace win32 compatibility with more AI features. Windows should become an AI platform
gupret jeetesh sir kindly inform you +5 rupee was added to your account sir
>>107834618Cut 32-bit application support for moar AI shit
>>107835355>removing support for Old Things means we'll automatically get better New Thingsnot how it works, not for a long time now.
>>107835381you are a luddite
>>107835571theres maybe a better term for it - 'one who stopped believing in progress' - idk.
So what's the linux distro with the lowest number of indian devs?
>>107832165>>107826305>>107826835>>107827076>>107827403i used all of them
>>107829252>slackware>spend 14 hours trying to a single program working because the dev is too lazy to include a basic package manager that can handle dependencies>in 2026lmao
>>107826281Isn't devuan or hyperborea moving to bsd soon? That's about all I'm interested. Linux is inherently jeeted and the only solution is moving away from it. Closed source would be preferred I don't want the possibility of jeets touching my code
>>107826281make your own based on LFS
>>107826281NixOS
With the current state of the PC market I’m thinking of buying Apple, I know the M4 is powerful but how is MacOS? I heard Tahoe is shite but haven’t looked too deep into it.
>>107814412The M4 chip delivers outstanding performance and battery life. macOS stability is version-dependent. While some users report no issues with Tahoe, widespread criticism cites compatibility problems, UI bugs (especially with Liquid Glass), and instability that's led many to advise waiting or staying on older, stable versions like Sonoma or Sequoia for critical work.
>>107834054I want a high end CPU laptop. My choices are AMD 395+, AMD 9955HX, or macbook pro.>395+Available on like one single laptop and I don't want a 14'' HP. AMD apparently refuses to ship it to OEMs and/or it's not considered a useful market or something>9955HXGuzzles 200W for minimal improvement in performance so I'd rather strix halo, also almost exclusively comes in massive xboxhueg gaming laptops, I don't need a gaming gpu>M4/M5 maxM4 max was already neck and neck with strix halo 395+ in benchmarks, if M5 max is the usual 15-20% bump in performance it'll basically be the best option. Meanwhile AMD still fails to supply 395+ to most OEMs and apparently has zero plans to bump it this gen, the 400-series seems to be more of a refresh of the mid tiers since the most powerful AI400 chip I've seen announced is a 12 core (and will probably remain vapourware for another 6-9 months judging by how long even strix halo laptops took to appear).I just want to be able to compile large projects fast without having to ssh into a server on the other side of the world and deal with remote rsyncing and all that garbage. Money is no object but getting a powerful machine that runs linux is apparently cock and ball torture.>snapdragon x2From what I've seen from the snapdragon elite, it's not competing with the top performers, and also linux support was atrocious last I checked and it was basically designed as a windows ARM machine. I haven't seen anyone take it seriously or make any sort of high-powered laptops with it.Maybe in a few more years we might have open high-end ARM laptops. But the top end of x86 is not terrible in comparison, like I said 395+ from all benchmarks and tests I've seen is basically neck and neck with the current best M4 max in performance and is not dramatically worse in power consumption either, it's a beautiful chip really; it's just not being fucking mass-produced and not being iterated upon.
>>107835303AI max 395 is not even close to m4 PRO chip. M5 MAX will smoke it.
>>107835345>one single benchmark>multicore benchmark on a workstation machineNow compare multicore scores across a variety of benchmarks (not just one version of one vendor). I've spent an autistic amount of time trying to decide this and my conclusion is that it's really just close enough that it's impossible to conclude which one will be faster without testing my specific workload.Anyway as for M5 max I agree that it will likely be the actual winner since again Apple is doing a generational performance bump while AMD is not, so it will become a no-brainer. But that just supports my point, my options are either a shittier linux machine, or a powerful machine with an OS that I hate using, hence me unironically considering virtualizing linux on top of macOS.
>>107834064The mini's been treating me well, I enjoy the quietness in comparison to my Linux PC
