Welcome to /k/, 4chan's weapons board. Our board centers around weapons, armor, and other myriad military technology. While guns are the primary topic, threads involving any other sort of weapons, from swords and knives to tanks and jet fighters, come up frequently as well.Discussions about politics, current events, or gun control belong on >>>/pol/Before posting a thread, please check our catalog to ensure that a thread about the same topic does not already exist.
All discussion of politics and current events goes on /pol/. >>>/pol/
>see 30 of these running towards you from the horizonwyd?
>>64271818Shoot the 30 chinks. Take robo waifu into rape dungeon.
>>64277516>Drone warrior gets its leg blown offBOB SAGET!
>>64271980I did not know that robots can get autism spazz outs.
>>64277410to hide the midget wearing a robot hat....yes, I'd fuck the midget in the robot hat, what board do you think this IS?>>64277436The blessings of the phone company are upon thee, brother, upgrade to a robowang now and journey ye unto Canopus to evangelize the cyberwhores.
We all know commercially affordable clankers are going to look like nip cosplayers.Not that I mind.
Ops Core Fast Bump EditionOLD: >>64272967
>>64277901This one?
>>64277907>plenty of sourcesmay we see them?
>>64277875Send me one of your women
>>64277833Not a metric to use to speak your opinion as fact, sorry not sorry again big dawg
>>64277915Sure https://sg.news.yahoo.com/undercover-video-staffer-claims-doj-213417673.htmlhttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-08-01/epstein-files-trump-s-name-was-redacted-by-the-fbihttps://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-name-redacted-epstein-files-public-figures-2107647https://youtu.be/oRlCWruIFGg?si=d7iNS32qFL6m5ACUhttps://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/fbi-personnel-jeffrey-epstein-files-mentioning-trump-dick-durbin-says-rcna219699https://nationalpost.com/news/world/fbi-redacted-trump-from-epstein-files-for-privacyComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
*does nothing*
>>64277724you're retarded
>>64277401>If you give me a heavy machine gun platoon, the naming tells me everything I need to know about the platoon's use and how I should deploy them. I know their limitations and how they should NOT be employed.This is only true if they have a weapon that can, outside of doctrine, be classified as a heavy machine gun. Imagine if your HMG platoon carried a BAR on a tripod instead of say, a .50 cal. You'd use it as a HMG platoon and it would fail.
>>64277787But the entire discussion is a result of people not agreeing with the definitions, so you cant use the royal "we" to argue your point
>>64275986>In 1963 in Yorkshire, a class of British Army armorers put one Vickers gun through probably the most strenuous test ever given to an individual gun. The base had a stockpile of approximately 5 million rounds of Mk VII .303 ammunition which was no longer approved for military use. They took a newly rebuilt Vickers gun, and proceeded to fire the entire stock of ammo through it over the course of seven days. They worked in pairs, switching off at 30 minute intervals, with a third man shovelling away spent brass. The gun was fired in 250-round solid bursts, and the worn out barrels were changed every hour and a half. At the end of the five million rounds, the gun was taken back into the shop for inspection. It was found to be within service spec in every dimension.
>>64275884I mean, they wouldn't do Nothing. They'd just fail to penetrate all the important bits like the pilot's char or engine block. You'd basically need to saw the wings off with bullets. Which happened but not as much as one 20mm Mine Shell blowing off entire tails.
So, as you might remember, I bought a Chinese titanium MOS plate that turned out to be far superior in fit and finish compared to the American-made Forward Controls Design plate, which caused a lot of seething on here.Some of the /k/ope included:>you need to hand-fit it>it has to be oversized, because it shouldn’t fit out of the box>just put it in the freezer, bro>if you have common core reading comprehension, the plate was actually advertised as out of spec>nobody has figured out hwo to machine metal to specAnyway, because I’m a curious person, I got myself another American-made plate. Not to compare it with the Chinese one (which we all know is superior), but to test whether the Chinese plate is actually made of titanium. Since titanium is heavier than aluminum, you can compare the weight ratio to tell if one is aluminum and the other is titanium. I know this isn’t definitive proof, but it’s enough to put my mind at ease.So I went online, looked for an American-made aluminum plate, and ordered one from CHPWS. And oh boy ,if I thought FCD was bad, I wasn’t prepared for this shit lmao1. It’s visibly smaller, and when mounted on the Glock, it rattles.
>>64277788however many the state will allow him to use from their stockpile for his shilling attempts. the one in his first thread looked like it still had factory oil coating the slide.
>>64277805>>64274313case in point, this doesn't even look wiped down
>>64277248There's no rules on how to use greentext cause you newfaggot zoomers could never understand how to use it properly so anon can use it however they want
This misfitting plate is a facet of a bigger problem. The reason american cars do not sell well abroad is for the same reason this plate doesn't fit the gun out of the box. Americans are not good engineers and they are absolutely lazy when it comes to quality control and chosing good materials, an american will invariably chose the cheapest. Long term this gives american export products such a bad reputation that people simply wont consider them if they have alternatives.
wish the chinks would just sell us full guns at this point$100 AK's for everyone
How did HK manage to con so many governments and HK paypigs that it was better than a regular AR?
>>64277782>Canada doesn't existA man can dream?
>>64277749I don't know how many times you mouthbreathers have to be told that a rifle having a DI or piston system has no bearing on cold weather reliability. How the fuck would it? Do you know how guns work? Explain yourself.
>>64277749Norway have been using the 416, 417, G36 and C7/C8 pretty much all together at some point
>>64277797>Huh? Using the energy from the fired cartridges gas sooner results in more energy transferred than using it a foot later to blow against the bolt instead of to push a piston? No way!
>>64277881Yeah you got no guns.
What is the state of the Russian SOF? As of Dec. 2023 the VDV were basically gone and now they're creating a draft of 2 million soldiers, as of Jan. 2024. By Sept. 2025, they lost over 200,000 of them (KIA/WIA/MIA), and now they can't perform anything but hopeless uncoordinated probing attacks. As of this month, due to massive fuel and supply shortages thanks to Ukrainian drone strikes on fuel depots and tankers, they can't move tanks and heavy equipments on the battlefield no more. They're basically Hamas status by now. Now they're using motorcycles toride to their deaths. In 2022, I'd hear stories of entire battalions being dropped in just weeks, sometimes in just single engagememts. They can develop new tanks, but without fuel, they're just glorified scrap metal. They performed meat wave attacks until there's no meat to throw. And Ukraine has gotten so used to their "waves" that they can outnumber them massively, with only a few tanks (like the M1 Abrams from Australia) with maybe some drones and knock out entire battalions at a time. I don't even know if they have elite units left hardly. Wagner Group they killed off themselves. And what's left of them is getting torn to shreds by ISIS in Africa. Now they're basically resorting to using police riots weapons, like tear gas and new asphyxiating gas weapons that has yet to produce any results. They got kicked out of Pokrovsk, Crimea has turned into a death trap, and Ukraine doesn't have hardly any size to compare to. Their Gerads/Shaheds are becoming useless. You might as well say they already lost. They could drop the nukes, but Ukraine's got flamingos now. It's about time Putin swallows his pride.North Korea even got pissed off at Russia over their losses in the first Kursk offensive. China they're isolated from as they're just mediators to the conflict like the US.
>>64277612The stock market is so gay, because everything is always "already priced in". For every hobbyist who thinks he knows what defense companies are next up for contracts, 100 gay analysts on Wall Street knew months ago. t. bought Lockheed in 2022
>>64277547And those shells will magically teleport to the Russian positions in Ukraine from their depots in North Korea?
>>64277367>ziggers STILL buckbroken by GoK
>>64276581>What is the state of the Russian SOF?Last I read about them was that they had been transformed into an improvised NCO corps for all the untrained mobiks and kontraktniks.
>>64276680>Yummy pastaIt's stale.>but it's new->...and already stale.
Can China build figthers with this level of precision?
>>64277811my point is that all you need to do is intelligence gathering to find out how many tanks, planes, ships, etc your potential enemy has, do research and development to find out how many of what type of missile is needed to destroy it with 99% certainty (for example a thaad missle has a 52% chance of intercepting an icbm but that raises to 97% when you fire 4 at it) and then you just build enough of them and send them to bases in the rings we spent the last century building around our enemies. Now all of their shit is worthless. You then protect these missiles with the various systems developed to intercept threats, using intelligence gathering again to find out how many missiles they have, etc. And then you keep your own retaliation/first strike cruise missiles aimed at the military, industrial, economic and infrastructure targets which cause maximum damage to your enemies ability to make war and also a nuclear deterrent. Taking this route is orders of magnitude cheaper than building obsolete manned systems, the training, maintenance, etc. Pretty much everyone has already figured this out, which is why the b21 is intimidating to no one
>>64277886>Bombers can do a lot more than dropping nukes dipshit.not cheaper or more effectively than other missiles. Its a vaniety project and nothing more, which is why there were supposed to be over 100 b2s but they stopped at 20, they are simply a waste of money
I'm more concerned about our ability to afford to go to War than our capability
>>64277887How are you going to collect that intelligence?How are you going to react to shifting conditions on the battlefield?How are you going to deliver those missiles to those targets?A cruise missile can take out one target only once, a bomber can take out multiple targets each run and then do it over and over again, they can be recalled or retasked.what if an enemy deploys jamming or battlefield obfuscation? What if they don't stand still like retards and actually move?
>>64277895They stopped because the cold war was over and shit was expensive, they are making 100 b-21s.Are you going to use ICBMs to do SEAD/DEAD?
/gq/ editon>New here? Read this:https://pastebin.com/Ndb2jSAuhttps://howtogetagun.ca/>What was banned Dec 5th 2024?https://pastebin.com/CB69hUn0>Want to hunt? CFG Hunting license info:https://pastebin.com/nC8RpYb3>Want to buy something? Recommended /cangen/ vendors list (patched 04.25.2024):https://pastebin.com/enRiU8JCComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>64277777checked, it sucks here
>>64277777:0
>>64277777Weapons?
>>64277556Wait you can actually do this?? Is that just NH or is it possible in other states?
>>64277905Pretty sure NH is unique in that regard
How do you respond without sounding mad?
>>64275712By agreeing and showing my P32
>>64275748Because it’s half the weight and holds 3 more rounds. It’s not like .32 H&R is significantly more effective.
>>64277835Yeah, something like that but polymer. I really like the semi-exposed hammer on the Guardian.
>>6427710432 auto used in self defense shootings has roughly the same stop (70%) and kill (30%) rates as both 9mm and 45 auto. The numbers drop significantly for 25 auto, which is a terrible caliber for self defense.my p32 is in cuck state jail for another week ;_;
>>64277885Cant wait for the .30 super carry stats
What is /k/s verdict?
>>64275875this.
>>64275875Bullshit. ALL prism optics suck ass.That includes ACOGs.
>>64277590Works great with my astigmatism :^)
>>64277583Trijicon suppresses our medicine by making a 40 year old product cost a billion dollars
>>64275859It's all a matter of task and purpose>Dot+MagGreat if you're shooting a lot at short range and at night but want some ability to hit a target beyond spitting distance though obviously trash at anything beyond 300 or so yards>'Cog+DotGreat generalist pick, can comfortably dunk on mid range targets and can handle close range. However can't go super far (which really isn't that much of a big deal of were talking about 5.56), and can't dominate short range or NV like a dot can>MPVO+DotThe most flexible option, letting you hit anything from point blank to a thousand yards with ease. However it's heavy and generally sucks in terms of FOV when used as an ACOG stand-in>LPVOActual fucking meme, especially if you attach a red dot and completely torpedo the point of buying an LPVO. It'd be legitimately less stupid to buy a fixed power scope with a dot
>>64277321Ah yes, I've seen a few GSA sporters around, one was a MAS-36 that sold really cheap. Still in the original 7.5mm French but with the forend trimmed back and sling swivels added.
>>64265937>>64266268What is the purpose of having so many guns? I understand having a main and a backup, but i feel like you need ammo way more than an extra gun..
>>64275899Funnily enough, I used to own an M1A, and regret trading it off. And I also agree that all bullpups are trash, I just kind of like the Aug aesthetically, and a friend wanted to sell me his for a good price. I guess that narrows it down to the M1A. I really like that rifle's balance, and its the best rifle I've shot with in terms of accuracy.
>>64277337Yeah they’re not collectors items or anything like that. It was just a run of the mill American manufacturer that made guns for the average Joe that wanted a gun that would go bang each time. >>64277350I was just being silly (; >>64277538Doo eet.
>>64277350I have plenty of ammo and way more guns then just my 1911/2011 collection.
What am I in for?Note: I only shot a glock 19 and a RIA VR80
>>64265952To be fair 45 is big enough that hollow points aren’t needed.
>>64276258>A standard A1 is very difficult to fire two handed, Wtf is this noguns bullshit, holy shit.
>>64277447Fun fact: Guns aren't mean to have the slide dropped on a loaded chamber either. It can snap the extractor.
>>64277904What does the gun do when it’s fired and cycles the next round genius
>>64277919It strips a round from the magazine instead of slamming the extractor claw straight onto the rim
OLD THREAD:>>64264058https://github.com/rcc11/4chan-sounds-player>Simulate schizophrenic auditory hallucinations with the sound player plugin!
Is hot rape good for you?
>>64274307>cost>stoppin powah>ease of productionWhile these were nice bonuses, the single deciding factor in the rise of the gun was ease of use. Medieval England for example had a system of archery training that was basically a way of life. People everywhere started shooting bows from a young age and never stopped, it was a skill honed over decades. The gun could do away with all of that, it was something you could operate after a few days of training. I'm ignoring crossbows here because they had similar advantages to the gun but other disadvantages.
>>64277809It's GRAPE. GRAPE. With a G.
>>64277809If it's a sexy woman doing it to you, maybe...
>>64277866But what if she's riding you at gunpoint and the gun is a sig?
