338 Norma magnum. Grok said it's a good rifle for it and it would weigh like 11-12 pounds. It could be a battle rifle, sniper and light anti armor with explosive rounds.
>>64635548Ok
Why do you keep buying plastic striker slop?
>>64635542make a printed/80% Luger frame with new production barrels and locks and we'll slurp it up.
>>64635542>Why do you keep buying stuff that fits your use case and budget?Shut the fuck up faggot.
>>64635542>>64635544this
>>64635569But OP is a massive cock gargling fag who just wants to piss and moan about new thing bad. I could tell him about the various good new production guns that exist but he'd continue to whine how it isn't as good some mass produced pistol of yesteryear despite never so much as being in the same zip code as one
>>64635542could it be because items on the right are a lot cheaper and therefore more available than items on the left? except the first row
Honest thoughts on the Rafale?
>>64631792This wasn't true even before the whole jeet fiasco
>>64635471There's credible rumors that the only difference between a PL-15 and a PL-15E is the sequencing of the dual pulse rocket motor, which would be done in software based on flight parameters. If you burn the 2nd pulse early and turn it into a single pulse missile, you nerf the range and basically turn it into a slightly larger amraam with slightly larger range.So all it takes to turn a PL-15E into a non-E is probably a very small firmware hack to re-enable the dual pulse motor.
>>64635471>Paki J-10s probably didnt use AWACS to guide the missiles because the only one around was the SAAB 400 which is only compatible with F-16sThat's not what the Pakis claim, they claim to have achieved full integration between the J-10s and JF-17s and its SAAB Erieye using a homegrown Link-17 datalink system which they modified with Chinese technical assistance. They also acknowledge they had surveillance help from Chinese satellites.>i think chinks are either underselling the range of their own missiles or Pakis got PL-15 with PL-15E markings under the table.Why? If the reported range of the PL-15E is 145 km and you say the distance of the engagement happened at 130 km that would fit inside the estimated range.As for Chinese claims on their domestic PL-15 nobody has seen them in action so it's hard to tell how real they are.
>>64635558>Speaking on a recent podcast, Michael Dahm, a senior fellow at AFA’s Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, said the kill chain may have started with a Pakistani ground radar—“maybe a surface-to-air missile system, or some other type of radar system”—which “illuminated the Indian target.” Then, a Pakistani J-10C fighter “launched its missiles, probably at range, and finally, an airborne early warning and control aircraft used a midcourse datalink to update and guide the missile to the Indian fighter.” “The Pakistani Air Force deployed …’ A’ launched by ‘B’ and guided by ‘C’” and hit the target, he added.
>>64635039That Camo is absolutely S E X OEXO>>64635471Pakis develop Link-17 for this specific reason.
They are coming for your leadhttps://www.npr.org/2025/12/08/nx-s1-5599539/hunters-encouraged-to-trade-lead-bullets-for-copper-to-protect-scavenging-animals
>>64634281I've never heard anyone say wild hog is good eating unless you trap it and force it to eat acorns. Otherwise they taste like trash because they eat trash. Maybe if you spicebomb it and slow cook it'll be alright but anything tastes good when you do that
>>64633044My main hunting bolt doubles as one of my PRS bolts so I actually do shoot nice stuff through it regularly, more expensive then my hunting rounds with some experiments (putting aside savings from handloading). I completely recognize that's not the norm, nor should it be. But at the same time I'll note that in the context of hunting I also don't think the shifts are that significant. The fact is when we're talking performance center fire rifle stuff when we're aiming to hit a 2-3" circle on an animal at <200yd and even that is rare normally it's <100yd, that's just not a very high bar. Like taking bog standard 308, 150gr TSX is going to be like, .3" difference in drop at 200yd vs 150gr FMJ. The real difference between match grade and cheapshit isn't generally average performance but rather variance. Higher variance doesn't change zero though. If you're competing and really do care about fractions of a moa then yeah for sure, but I've never seen the need to stress about it otherwise.I mean, I'm not discounting exceptions either, like if you're using something spicier and suspect you're getting to the point of barrel burnout that's gonna be worth checking. Or if you know you plan to hunt something more challenging. And I do end up "checking" before hunting just because I love to shoot these guns and don't need much of an excuse to go out anyway, plus the ritual of "confirming my zero" right before hunting season starts is a nice annual chance to meet up with other guys on our properties or a range and then go to a bar afterwards and start the season off nicely. But if for some reason someone was truly sweating every single bullet they put through their rifle, I don't think objectively speaking slightly different BCs and velocities in the same caliber are likely to shift the impact point a few moa to the point where it'd really fuck you.
>>64635508I would think the different materials might be an issue because they would have different weights. I know that bong faggot tgs outdoors was super happy to find some pair of rounds for one of his rifles that were 2 different loads but had the same point of impact. I forget if it was solids vs jhp. I know I've had zero changes with my .22 but that was like shorts vs minimags and on my target rifle but that was shooting high power and is like an moa, half moa at 2/300 yards and could be due to something else other than the ammo
>>64635521Weight gets incorporated into the umbrella of balllistic coefficient (though of course shape is an impact too). But you can get identical weight copper stuff, it just has to be somewhat longer due to being lower density, so the primary issue is if you run out of COAL headroom for older cartridges not designed for modern high BC rounds. Then you either have to go out of spec or swap cartridge. But normally with anything anyone uses for hunting it's not a problem.But the point isn't that it has no impact, the point is that the impact isn't likely to be a limiting factor in typical hunting even with somewhat different BCs because you just don't see significant drop or windage with normal center fire stuff at all until you get to distances that are way beyond what most of us do (or ethically should) hunt at. I mean, there are also other approaches, like any modern optic beyond airsoft tier should track well, so you should just be able to note down different zero points too and could adjust that way, but it's just not a big deal. I really think most of the lore around zeroing before hunting season is more about (very reasonably!) creating a ritual for people who aren't shooting all year to take some time refamiliarizing themselves, getting into the mindset and meeting up with buddies vs a major risk of the rifle having had a radical zero shift in storage. And of course it doesn't hurt just in case it did take an impact without one realizing it.Plus it's fun.
>>64635564>But you can get identical weight copper stuff, it just has to be somewhat longer due to being lower density,Around 15% longer, to be exact. (Jacketed) lead is ~20% denser than copper, but since you lengthen the body and/or boattail rather than the nose it works out to a smaller length increase proportionally. That means copper bullets can start having boattails at lighter weights, which is cool.
DRIP
>>6463548414 year old discovers german uniforms
It's been 2 months...https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/hidden-hangars-navys-fa-xx-could-decide-china-fight-trump-moves-now
>>64634653You think the engineers who worked at the YF-23 35-40 years ago still work there?
>industrial base concerns of two sixth-generation programs occurring simultaneouslySo let me get this straight, this is not the government saying it's too expensive, this is the industry saying they can't do it? lmao.Meanwhile china pumping out 3 different 6th gen at the same time lmao.
>>64635421 lol west taiwan has not even made a 5th gen fighter yet.
>>64635421you could have scrolled the thread instead of coming up with a smug bad faith conclusion. >>64624374
>>64635493That most presents zero evidence and makes no sense. Nobody these days pays engineers or workers to sit around and wait for another contract. If you don't have a follow-up contract, you fire everyone.Which is what they did.Which is why they have no capacity.
There is no more beautiful a round than the humble 30-06.
>>64634423how could I be so dumb?
Autistic fixation thread.
I hate marxism.
>>64634438Because it's been widely reported and published they used 8mm mauser. Are you retarded? They literally tried the, "this Nazi rifle removes Nazis" meme
>>64634372It seems to me that 45 and 30-06 are uniquely suited to bubba loading
Which firearm is the most likely to have the safety off - in the ankle holster, hip holster, or shoulder holster?
>>64635368Any of the striker fired. But you'd have to be an absolute retard to think something like your gif is possible. It's like mouth breather retardation levels. It's be funny to watch what happens as a result though
>>64635368>>64635403Anything's possible if your sneak is high enoughBut I'm confused, he's going to bump the pistol and make it look like an accidental discharge?
Previous thread >>64615697>image limit reachedhttps://github.com/rcc11/4chan-sounds-player>Simulate schizophrenic auditory hallucinations with the sound player plugin!
>>64634056>Cruiser gets in range of a CV>You know, USN Fleet Problem IX predicted all this...>>64634400Mostly sorted, just need to get the wrapping done
>>64634870that's why you should make all your murder weapons out of chocolate
>Cumrag Pidorovich, is time to assault hohol position>Here's your armored ladahttps://files.catbox.moe/9k57se.MP4
>>64630638You, as a leader, cannot expect people to continue going into harms way if you are never seen to go there too. No need to pull a Julius Caesar and lead a counterattack in person, but there has to some perceived personal danger or people will quit following. I think he understands that much. "Give me bullets, not a plane ride" indeed.
>>64633198Those ones you see of Russian "refuseniks" in storage tanks or holes in the ground being thrown scraps and slapped? The basement is what happens to them once the commissars get bored of beating and raping them.
>>64633344Wtf did I just watch? Russians keep casualy walking into a killzone like TF2 bots do into a lv 3 sentry nevermind the piles of corpses. Classical music at 8 minutes. One drunk just decides to stand there like an NPC and get his fuel stuffed backpack blown up. Every time one of their comrades gets exploded they continue like nothing happened.???????? Im sorry but for the sake of my sanity I refuse to belive that those things were human like me. Robots, bio-robots.
>>64635312Nah. Can't let the chinks, ziggers or yanks have an easy time like that. "supervision" isn't what's keeping the lid on to start with.
>>64633344>https://files.catbox.moe/sxbxfb.mp4That fucking part at the 8 minute mark with the Brahms Hungarian dance soundtrack sent my sides into orbitShit was almost Charlie Chaplin slapstick tier, perfect tragicomedy >>64635482>for the sake of my sanity I refuse to belive that those things were human like me. Robots, bio-robots.The OG robots by the Czech dudes which invented the word were not mechanical but artificial, simple humans made for tasks regular people couldn't be forced to do, so you hit pretty close to the mark kek
>duuude gun laws are pointless because everyone with 4k worth of tools and 2 weeks of free-time can build his very own SMG (that has an effective range of 10 yards)ok but where are you going to get the ammo? sure, smuggling 10 rounds across the border is easier than smuggling a weapon but for a proper "protect the rights of the people"-situation you need hundreds if not thousands of rounds per gunseems like it would make more sense to build DIY long range rifles instead of SMGs / Pistols so you can get the most out of each roundyes, you can make your own ammo with blanks and slugs but that stuff can be banned too and then its back to square 1
>>64630218I am no expert, but I don't think the feds can CSI some rando bullet or brass to the guy that bought it. It's not like every individual bullet is serialised. Or connected to the guy that bought it.
Pajeet detected
>>64635063stuff like that is just pointlesskilling 2-3 ... even 100 nogs will do nothing but feed enemy propagandathere was one (1) incident 10 years ago in my cuntry and the media has been milking it ever sincego big or go home
>>64635079There are three ways to go about it, conductive segments of the barrel, which would be almost impossible to diy, small holes in the barrel externally wired at every charge point or nested cables that run up through your charges and projectiles inside the barrel. There are drawbacks with both, external you'd need to carefully load, maybe bag your charges in a bright color so you could see that you were properly planting igniters. It would also weaken your barrel having holes up and down the side, maybe a second outer barrel or some reinforcement could ameliorate that. Internal wiring would require a void in your projectiles and charges for the wire, gradually shrinking as you needed less and less wires. It could be constructed in a unit then slid into your barrel, the wire that didn't get blown out by following projectiles might start causing a bore obstruction though. You'd also have a much harder time rifling and the power would drop with every subsequent shot, which come to think of it might be a benefit counteracting a problem of that system, muzzle velocity increasing as each projectile has more barrel to travel.The two styles I have heard of for ignition are using a resistor like some nichrome wire or using enough voltage for a strong enough open spark. Straight voltage is probably the faster option and cheaper than using electric matches or bits of nichrome that'll most likely be single use.Then it's just a matter of wiring it up to an appropriate switch.
anyway, the future is light gas gunsmuch easier to build and regulate for the hobbyistmuch more capable for the military user
how would it change WWII if we adopted a closed bolt colt monitor with a flash hider instead of the garand and BAR?it's only a few pounds heavier than a garand.
The US could have fought the war using Martini-Henrys and it wouldn't have changed much of anything
>How would the war be changed if this BAR was used instead of the other BARlmao
>>64634909another illiterate
>>64633553>no AK-47 in 1860An AK-47 in 1864
>>64634718>rifle grenade launchersFor the life of me I cant figure out how nobody keyed onto the idea of an old timey M79 or M320 but instead armies had their soldiers wrangle various adaptors onto ther rifles instead. Having a means of giving every squad the ability for easy indirect fire that doesnt involve calling up the chain for company level assets like mortars would be a greater boon than every man humping around a BAR imho
Eyup... all in a day's work *burp*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoPvtG7L2rEhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIt56ezNiVwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_7kkNS-m3s
>>64635306Misusing the term “cargo cult” again award
>>64635304The Chinese have gained worldwide dominance in many new industries recently.That isn't possible if you aren't doing at least something right.
>>64635047Beautiful to see they actually use them for what they're designed to do. A lot of shit countries just buy equipment and don't use them right like India getting their rafales shot down due to incompetence
>>64634297>Chinks give them all this free shit to stir the pot>Gets fucking capturedBetter luck next time bugtards!
>>64635460implessive
Opinions on a Beretta BRX1 with a mystory meat red dot?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpBs0SqXiPg&pp=ugUEEgJlbg%3D%3D
it's a bolt action hunting rifle. there's not much to it.
>OPINIONS ON [CURRENT EVENT]???>what WEAPON would you use for [CURRENT EVENT]>tactical advantage of [CURRENT EVENT]?
>>64635502for hunting what exactly? pic unrelated
>>64635549Jews
Now that the dust has settled, was it overkill?
>>64630428>At least in WW1 we had shit like those Christmas football matchesAnd gas attackshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWnc-ZlIo5s
>>64630777>Much of the English cities deserve all the floods of niggers, dravidians, and sand niggersSo which one are you?
>>64632194Is that old pasta?
>>64633066Well duh, you can't have one without the other.
>>64630741you're confusing the Nazi brutality in Ukraine with the Holodomor, where the Soviets starved and murdered millions of Ukrainiansthe Nazis are remembered rather fondly in Ukraine compared to the brutality they suffered under the Soviets