Whatever happened to the patch threads?
>>64760630Aho not to be impatient or anything but when the fuck are you gonna ship my shit? I've been waiting since last year
>>64761334Something that has always struck me about /k/ is that it has always been rich in subculture, to the point that every other board is very bland by comparison. /k/ brings more life to 4chan than every other board in a very weird way, its practically infectious.
>>64760458I haven't bought a patch since ~2021 area. A lot of merchants came and went. Unfortunately the best ones were small batches and some go hit with C&D.
>>64763270I agree. You go to /arg/ and /ak/ or /gq/ and there's always different people and different lore. The old generals (/nvg/, /pfg/, and /bag/) also had different guys too.This board has an... autism advantage.
>>64763133must I make more?>>64763205I was getting some usps error on APO and international orders that ive been trying to figure out with usps. if it's not one of those 3, the rest up to today has shipped
Whats stopping ADSs from shooting HARMs at aircraft using radar since you can perceive radar from twice the distance the radar can see you just shoot a fuck huge missile that goes hypersonic at the enemy awac
>>647615971: You can fit a radar emitter on a missile. It's a bit shitty compared to a ground array, but airborne targets are much easier to distinguish than ground targets. You don't need to track their emissions if you can spot them with yours.2: There are more planes in the sky than just your target. If you go yeeting missiles into the wild blue yonder at a solid maybe, you're liable to hit a friendly or an airliner.
>>64761597>passive seeking vs activeBecause radars are either stationary or require them to turn off to move (which is almost as good as killing them) and as such such a missile would be nearly useless against aircraft.
>>64761654Collateral damage isn't something bugs and browns worry about.
>>64761726If you don't care about friendly fire, you're probably going to lose your war.
>>64761597home on jam exists
Will it ultimately be a cult hit like the AR-15?
>>64762013The M14 was dramatically inferior at doing this to the M16, which is why the M16 replaced the M14.>>64761913>>64762039Comical cope.
>>64762039>inherently lightweight, can be made incredibly light if you want>fundamentally accurate design, inline as fuck>basically no recoil, in big part because of that>easily modular to adapt for your personal comfort, if you don't like the standard ergoes there's countless options>excellent reliability if you don't go for the really cheap ones>the cheap ones still have pretty good reliability and aren't hard to improve on>can build a good and highly reliable rifle out of parts, still getting good quality while saving money>standardized in the best infantry rifle cartridge, 5.56x45mm, but can be had in many others, like .350 LGN or .458 SOCOM for hunting larger game>contrary to popular belief and marketing, "DI" is quieter than short-stroke piston, lacking the Piston Pop effect>not picky on cleaning, vast majority of carbon will collect inside the BCG, and it'll tolerate a lot of that for a long time if you lubed it>action is pretty well buttoned up and tends to keep dirt out fairly wellI'd say the most notable weaknesses of the AR15 are these:>gas system doesn't love being shortened down a lot, you can make 10.5" and 8.5" barreled guns run reasonably well but they're never gonna be AS reliable as 14.5" and 16" barreled AR15sComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>64762039Delusional take
>>64762171The Spear is a good gun though. Make one in .308 and it will be a mighty fine battle rifle.
>>64762959No it isn't, and no it won't, it comes with crooked rails and shoots 6MOA, which is worse than an old 91/30.
Listen Here You Little Shit EditionPost wood (furniture)Big RiflesBig BulletsFroppy Frens InsideThread theme ~https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HUtwku8R9Q&list=RD1HUtwku8R9Q&start_radio=1As always; No Jannies, No TranniesPreviously, on X-men: >>64608347
>>64760888This will be sweet. Lookingnforwatd to fampho.
>>64761205Make me a fal one?
>>64655249I brought all my battle rifles out today to shoot. I think I've let optics become a crutch because I shoot like shit with irons now. Like 6+ MOA, I'm not exactly aiming small, but I can only really shoot reliably up to 200 yard with irons. I think my eyes are getting worse, because I can barely see the targets, but maybe it was the lighting/the paint on the targets. There wasn't much contrast with the steel and the berms. How did people manage to shoot long range with irons? Past 200 yards the front sight occludes all of the target. >>64760888That is awesome, and checked.
>>64763094>Past 200 yards the front sight occludes all of the target.NM front post.
>>64763561Or KNS, but not aware of any serious users.
How effective are the Japanese Self Defense Forces? Could they be as bad ass as the Imperial Japanese Army? How do they stack up to the PLA, Russian or Western armies if Japanese is allowed to fully re-arm?
>>64762212>How does the rapechink function in society when he's THIS thin skinned and assblasted 24/7?You have that backwards. He doesn't function in society, so he's this assblasted online (where it's more or less safe to do so).He'd probably be saner if he did function in and interact with society, that's sort-of what halfway houses are for, it's just hard when they're this dysfunctional.
>>64762285>Yeah but they don't do a very good jobIt's fucking Godzilla. A draw is fine.
>>64762469>3rd world later syndrome>JapanWords have fucking meanings and Japan is first world by literally every definition of the term in use.
>>64762667nah, keep him around. Autistic schizo rape enthusiast/scholar (virgin IRL) is pretty in line with the /k/ userbase
>>64760957I think that was a different schizo. The chinkspammer doesn't make his own threads, but that one did.
This is all I could find, quite a lot in 4 years. What do you anons think?SpaceAlready delivered>Synthetic-aperture radar satellites 1 unit>Nanosatellite imaging (PIAST), 3 units >EagleEye , 1 unit>Access to French Pleiades Neo optoelectronic data.In progress>Optoelectronic satellites 2 units (Ground station ready; satellites for 2027).>Small-sat EO/ISR constellation 4 unitsLandAlready delivered>M1A1 FEP main battle tanks, 116 unitsComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>64762322>Poland needs at least +100 F-35 or some other gen 5 fightersthis is not how NATO works. Each nation specializes in something it has a comparative advantage in. Estonia does cyber warfare, UK and France do nukes and expeditionary shit, other western european states do air forces. Poland, Turkey and Greece do massive ground forces. If Poland bought 100 F-35s it wouldn't be able to afford 400+ blinged up tanks, attack helicopters and rocket artilleryalso >some other 5th genlol, lmao
>>64761934>he believes a meme>>64762280>his entire knowledge about a subject comes from 4chang
>>64762130Hadrian and Antonious, 151 AD, colorized.
>>64762614Do you think he killed himself before he expired? I've always wondered that.
>>64761934pic rel
Bring on the migs.
>>64763467then why does it have a cameo
>>>/wsg/6058317enjoy
>>64763266How many NATO MiG's are left?
>>64763471There's a lot of units in C&C that are not buildable but have cameos. https://tcrf.net/Command_%26_Conquer:_Red_Alert_2/Unused_Graphics
>>64763530there is only one true Yuri
USA spent on average 250 000 bullets per kill in Afghanistan & Iraq.
>>64761202>exact same wayWdym
>>64760599So a bullet is like a wireless penis, therefore the enemy will get erect when fired upon, right? Thus the true purpose of suppressive fire is to deny the sexuality of your enemy by forcibly supplanting your own. To test this I suggest we must start a war, have verified straight men get fucked in the ass on both sides while near machine guns suppressing the enemy, and if any man getting fucked cums that means a.) they’re not gay and b.) what I said above was indeed correct.
>>64761094Thurdie world view is litterally "haha you didn't genocide us to extinction therefore we win and your a pussy!"
>>64758647>that picAmerican's don't know what the purpose of a lafette mount is?
>>64760852Not a very strong argument, considering that soldiers need to build proficiency by practicing, and doesn't AT ALL deflect from how willingly dishonest and backhanded the math is.Kill yourself basically.
IT'S FRIDAY!And you know what that means, don't you, anon?The next Paul Harrell Watch Party starts around 6pm Eastern Standard Time, 10pm UTC, 12pm Euro time (unless you're a bong), 15pm Commiefornia LA time.The stream starts when it starts, all you have to do is open the tab around the time it does (don't rely on it to work in the background).https://sync-tube.de/room/_WAWKKlPCome join us as we slowly work our way through the Paul Harrell catalog of videos every Friday, one hour at a time.Last time (>>64739098 (You) (Cross-thread)) we>peaked at 4 viewerslearned>if you're gonna have people inherit your guns, buy a couple extra mags for them in case they're poor>autoloaders are still better than revolvers for killing people>don't look at your gun while reloading if you can manage it>don't tell your wife she sounds like your motherComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>64763074Reminder I'm happy he's dead and you cultist freaks are sad about it.
>>64763074haven't been around for some time, new job has me working Saturdays. Have the people attending been dropping more or was last time just a bad day?
>>64763387Mostly just a bad day, took a little break during the holidays and we're still recovering.
>>64763366>rent freeno one truly dies until they're forgotten, anon, and Paul's got a long life ahead of him so long as you're kicking the can down the road.
>>64763074less than half an hour left before we start, boys
>see grown masc man with one of those not-a-purse things>immediately assume that that is where his piece isIs this a common thought process or am I being paranoid? Is this a valid form for CC?
>ITT: Grown ass men trying to get other grown ass men to wear fanny packs
>>64761717>Convenience is unmanly
>>64761917Pockets anon. Holsters. Belts. A jacket.
>>64761939Your attempt to shame other peoples choice in carrying things is just a matter of your personal taste?
>>64757361I'd love to see someone put out discreet tactical fanny packs in garish 80's/90's style designs.I feel like that defuses a lot of the "that gun has a gun" neuron activation that the classic earth tone molle boomerbag causes
>>64762523Still, I've always been interested in bullpups, and DesertTech seems like they're the best at it. The only other thing I was considering was getting a bufferless AR (I still don't know what the buffer tube even does) and putting it in a Triad chassis.
>>64762688DT's bolts are superb, just really pricey (though the occasional sale makes it mildly less painful). The ergos and performance is definitely nice on the mdr/wlrvrn, and they were always very nice if you got a good one. That was more of an "if" with the MDR than one would like though at that price. Now with the wlvrn seems like they finally got it pretty gtg in any caliber EXCEPT 308. It still has issues with that one just like the mdr did. However, that's far less of an issue with the wlvrn imo simply because it's so much lighter, the mdr felt clearly built to be a battlerifle. But the wlvrn at 7.4 lbs (16", 5.56) compares reasonably to stuff like the Aug (7.6 lbs) or X95 (7.9 lbs), though it's heavier then the RDB (6.9 lbs, though worth noting they make a bunch of versions including the "survival" which dispenses with grip and uses a lighter barrel which drops it all the way down to 5.9 lbs).Even so for someone interested in trying out bullpups coming from a standard for the first time, my default is still to recommend the RDB despite its own niggles (the downward eject is kind of irritating clear if it fucks up, though that should be rare) just because it's so relatively cheap, can easily get one for <$700. That makes it a fairly low risk way to try the form factor out and see what you think of it, not "risk" as-in "gun is bad" but more "gun works great, but I just can't get comfortable with the different manual of arms etc". Can always sell it or turn it into a truck gun if you decide you like them and buy something else. If you're sure you'll like 'em though sure try whatever.All that said don't buy anything until after shot show given it's less than a week away. DT and KT have both done announcements for that in the past.
>>64759880I'm pretty sure that's the G36 scope
>>64715425Famas
I have two but this one Is now supersafe. The SSAUGV1 works great. The aug is everything I ever dreamed of and more. I'm in love with this gun.
>3D Printed GunsWhat are the best filaments you guys are using for frames and gun parts? Is it still PLA + or are the different carbon/glass infused filaments better?What are you guys printing?
>>64742368bumpinby the way what's the opic gun?
>>64759656Legolini, not super powerful but a fun repeater
>>64748239You can order blank rifling barrel anywhere bro just don't be stupid and said it for gun part
>>64742368I cannot fucking stand conventional firearms with guarded pistol grip. THAT SHIT LOOKS MORE SUITABLE FOR BULLPUP OR PISTOLS
>>64760644Op is the budget arms guillotine based on a mac11>>64751259This one is the cyber ruger guillotine with ruger p89 parts
https://www.eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/eda-magazine/edm30---european-defence-matters-shelter-from-the-swarm.pdf
>In mid-November 1939, a German neon lamp tube and a design of a prototype proximity fuze based on capacitive effects was received by British Intelligence as part of the Oslo Report.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximity_fuzeAllied zisters... Did we get too cocky?Now we can't even claim the VT fuze anymore.What else is there? The Nordon bombsight? That was a better guarded secret than the Manhattan project?>The Norden was not as secret as believed; both the British SABS and German Lotfernrohr 7 worked on similar principles, and details of the Norden had been passed to Germany even before the war started.[2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norden_bombsightWhich also disproves the idea that Germany's spying was worse than that of the Allies.The cavity magnetron? Invented by Hans Hollmann in 1935.Speaking of that, how about radar in general?>The Freya radar was more advanced than its British counterpart, Chain Home.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freya_radarComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>64763429>Stolen design of Bazooka.A disposable recoilless rifle is supposed to be a "stolen design" of a re-usable rocket launcher? Are you retarded?
>>64763506Pancerfaust wasn't a ''recoilless rifle'' you dumb fucking turd. AND yes, Germans did steal the design.
>>64763517NTA but I think you´re mistaking Panzerfaust for the Panzerschreck
>>64763192Sexo
>>64762230>>64762230There's also the flipside where people kneejerk too hard in the other direction. It's not that the equipment was that terrible in the second half of the war, it's that the second half is when they got dogpiled by significantly more industrial output and manpower than they could match. There are certainly a few cases where resources could have been more efficiently distributed, with some of the more extreme examples being the result of Hitler overruling experts or due to infighting between different branches pursuing their own pet projects, but as a whole a lot of people are far to quick to strawman the germans as being knuckle dragging retards with bullshit like:>the germans were retards who kept having their pilots fly sorties until they died instead of rotating their experienced pilots back to train the next wave of pilots with lessons from the battlefieldignoring that having the manpower surplus to rotate your pilots back like that was a luxury that germany couldn't afford when being outnumbered on all sides.or>dumbass germans built jet engines that melted after a few hours of flightignoring that by that point in the war germany's industrial capacity had been bombed to shit and they could no longer manufacture the necessary alloys to the desired specifications for the engines, so they made due with what they had.>>64762315>>64762320>>64762327People hype up the fancy tanks, planes, and guns since those are glamorous and steal all the spotlight in the movies, but wars are won by boring shit like factories, oil, food, and logistics.
AK General /akg/Chocolate Chip Chinese Chestrig Edition>Thread #2086Old thread here >>64704982
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90SqzC6yWVYIt looks like PSA redesigned the Vuk again, and it looks much better, although not closer to the first one.
>>64763394>really like the ideas behind most PSA products>bought an akv to try them out>it was out of headspace and blew up on me and they refunded itgod damnit
>>64763394>still ugly>5.56Gay.
>>64763394It's still clearly a prototype that boils down to "a JAKL with a proprietary lower and shortened front end," but it's at least IN development (unlike the 50bmg).The additional screws holding the trunnion in place shows their engineering people both listen to complaints from the JAKL and have no sort of critical thinking skills on their own to know that the original screw layout was a bad design to begin with. I await the day they just copy the SCAR's trunnion mount, or that one of them goes and looks up why people stopped doing screw build AKs and we get a riveted one for the lols.
Is there a difference between the 1:9.45 twist rate seen on AK 103 clones and the 1:10 twist rate on something like a WASR? For example, with a PO 3.5x21P optic, would any twist rate aside from the 1:9.45 cause the scope to be inaccurate, and is the twist rate or caliber more important for the accuracy of the scope?
