This is the only genre that makes money and the money train isn't stopping any time soon. Short of a puritanical John Carpenter style government, there will always be demand for this shit.The question is, can a dude write successful girlporn? This is the literary question.I'm going to read this milking farm thing and see if I can't get a knack for how women write. I'm suspecting it's a bit like this:>Minimal attention to details and the world, emphasis on personal impressions and feelings; the world as a set of things that make you feel different ways.>Braindead, 12-15 year old brain simplicity. Imagine a Middle School girl trying to "speed download" social gossip updates to a friend.>Vanity, ego, zero accountability, petty delusions, cliches. This will require a bit of research and marketing savvy just to collect up what today's cliches are. Fortunately, women are dead simple and just go on TikTok/Twitter and see what buzzwords come up a lot.>Sultry language.This one's tough. From what I understand explicit, gross language is what sells this shit and is the female equivalent of visually seeing porn. On the other hand, I have a feeling that I could write porn that is vastly more detailed and explicit than what women read and would alienate them. I have a feeling it's just stuff like, "sweaty" "bulge" "heaving" "cock!" "pulsing". Words that sound distinctly naughty but remain vague. It's not about visualizing, even through text, sexual mechanics. It's about breaking social taboos so women feel "naughty" and liberated from their neurotic sexual restraints.>Female attractionThis is tough. How far do you go with "big muscles, ripped body"? How much do women want to read that, and when is it too much? Women like being dominated but they like to feel it was their choice to be dominated. As a man who understands women very well, I don't want to tap into their sexual triggers too accurately because that might lead to a sense of "revealing too much" about female sexuality which women don't like. They like most of it to remain implicit and simple.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>24863584>if a woman did something and never posted about it how would you know?You mean cheating? I just assume they all cheat.
>>24850035>As a man who understands women very well
>>24863601I mean if women read something and never post about it, how are you to know?
>>24860659>You can recognize chicks who draw erotica for chicks because there's a lot more of a narrative and a mood and they draw better.LolLmao even.The idea that women are more emotionally driven sexually or the like is a myth, it's absolutely a fucking myth. Their natural inability to identify with people they don't see as being "like them" enough makes it so they usually can't get into most visual porn, and the fact that their physical desires are more heavily decoupled from their emotional desires than men is also a factor, but what this means is that they tend to just get horny completely detached from their sexual and romantic interests and then gaslight themselves into the latter. Their porn though is still full of throbbing giant cocks getting forced into tight holes, fat asses and tits slapped around, getting choked like sluts, and all of that, constantly. It's all powerfully built or svelte men using women like fucktoys and making them love it.And it checks out in reverse, plenty of dudes love a swathe of written girl porn because unlike women they can easily insert themselves into the role of the dude and just imagine being a jacked as fuck minotaur or demon or whatever with some desperate slut literally whoring herself out to throat your cock. Ergo, it's the same shit fundamentally.
>>24863422nope. teenage boys do not go through a phase of being afraid of feminine bodily features, they just like tits and asses from the start. how's a young guy going to be afraid of tits when he used to suck on them for sustenance? and there's zero reason to "grow out" of liking tits, tits are features of an adult fertile woman, there's no dysfunction here. on the other hand young girls are often afraid of the features of an adult male, like large bodies, facial and body hair, muscles, strong jawlines etc, and they gravitate towards the temporary compromise of "girlish" boys, or they obsess over horses, which are "masculine" but sexually unthreatening. they're supposed to grow out of this. some don't.boybands have always exploited this, although focusing mostly on actual young girls and not batshit crazy middle-aged ladies. david bowie in the ziggy era was an early implementer of the technology. turns out if you act in a provocative manner while looking androgynous and wearing makeup girls aged 12-16 go into such a sexual frenzy the concert hall floor will be covered in three inches of pussy slime by the time they leave.
"There can be only one!" editionPrevious: >>24848643/wg/ AUTHORS & FLASH FICTION: https://pastebin.com/ruwQj7xQRESOURCES & RECOMMENDATIONS: https://pastebin.com/nFxdiQvCPlease limit excerpts to one post.Give advice as much as you receive it to the best of your ability.Follow prompts made below and discuss written works for practice; contribute and you shall receive.If you have not performed a cursory proofread, do not expect to be treated kindly. Edit your work for spelling and grammar before posting.Violent shills, relentless shill-spammers, and grounds keeping prose, should be ignored and reported.(And maybe double-space your WIPs to allow edits if you want 'em.)Simple guides on writing:Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
If that was actually the case anyone could just report it and we'll be deep inside /wg/s asshole again.
>>24863459You should just have her change into appropriate clothes. Do you know what a scull is like? It's not plausible that she's wearing street clothes going sculling. Also the whole sculling section is not very convincing. Are you saying the sculls are being kept outside with a bicycle lock? Boathouse, sand and pier doesn't sound right to me either or that if it's cold weather (she's wearing a coat?) as claimed, the old man is sitting there with his feet in the water or had just been swimming in a cold lake (hypothermia?).I googled some of the place names mentioned in your story and my guess is that these locations and stuff are made up? Why not use real locations? There is something jarring about the juxtaposition of luxury watches and cars in a place like rural Kansas. They don't fit together in a very convincing way. Even her own car is something I don't associate with the Midwest (and yeah, you probably want to capitalize that), but with the Northeast. Though I guess if it's a college town, we can make an allowance for that.>Townsmen Townies would sound more naturalMentioning God in the final sentence is probably not a good idea because it suddenly makes the story religious.
In 2014 i would oftentimes go hiking with a friend who was a junkie. Everyone in the social circle reached the conclusion he's beyond saving but we still hung out with him from time to time, and he's never stolen anything or asked for substantial amounts of money. A few times he just passed out midway through the trek and i'd have to carry him gor kilometers to come. I'm not sure what he was doing exactly. I've gotten pretty nostalgic about those times. The guy is still alive, but i think he keeps quitting and then falling back into the vice on a semi-yearly basis.
>>24864218This is awesome I'm eager for reading more man.
Wow, the real Judy Blume read my book, loved it, and now wants to be friends with me. I'm gonna be famous
What books do you know that have a similar subject matter to Pynchon's Bleeding Edge?I've already read most of his works, I'm talking about specifically COINTELPRO/War on Terror conspiracy type novels, excluding the usual spy fiction types like Le Carré. I've heard about Don DeLillo's Mao II so far, is that one any good?
>>24857252Clifford the big red dog
>>24861747>RAF/Brigate Rosse memoirs alreadyDon’t about those but Aberration goes into MK Ultra, ayyliums and UFOs, the deep state, Operation Desert Storm, white supremacist/neo nazi terrorist cells, operation paperclip, and connects it all to the Oklahoma bombing. And it’s funny how Timothy McVeigh is just like the average /pol/tard, but the books paints him as a somewhat tragic character. It’s a very Pynchonesque book.
>>24857252The Illuminatus Trilogy
>>24861747>I never really looked into Gibson beforethat's not merely Gibson though, it's Gibson in its 'post-sci-fi phase' or something, when he's trying to make the present feel like cyberpunkit's hit or miss but pretty unique imho and I like him more for the attempt but my favorite Gibson novel is still Count Zeroalso, be ready for a meandering plot going nowhere
>>24864226All right you've sold me on it !
REFORGED FROM RUIN EditionStubbed >>24854248>What is /wng/ - Web Novel General?A general for readers and authors involved or interested in the growing phenomenon of 'web novels', serialized English fiction posted to websites such as: Royal Road, Webnovel, Scribblehub, Wattpad, Archive of Our Own, Spacebattles, HFY, various personal author websites, and more>Why read web novels?Not for prose or tight editing or deep themes, frankly. As a whole, web novels are infamous for content sprawl and pacing issues. If you enjoy having millions of words to sink your teeth into to get to know the world and characters, though, you may be interested. Keeping up with other readers on a weekly basis to discuss the story's events unfolding is another perk, in the same way discussing an ongoing TV show might be.>Why write web novels?Ease of access & potential for Patreon earnings. Many successful authors gain an audience on their website of choice and funnel their readers into a Patreon. See graphtreon.com/top-patreon-creators/writing for an idea of what some are earning.Also, once an author has earned a fanbase, transitioning into an Amazon self-publishing career is several orders of magnitude easier than starting 'dry'.>/wng/ authors.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>24864258SOURCE????
>>24864258hate to say but it's true
>>24864248what am I supposed to do?
>>24864319AI cover with big but modestly covered titties
>>24864319The covers you hate work, it's why people use them.
When a particularly erotic book arouses me, I tend to masturbate - ferociously during the erotic scenes, and then a slight twist of my foreskin throughout the other junk.This evening I decided to treat myself to an old-fashion rub-and-tug while I read the entirety of Platform in a sitting.Y'know it's going well, I'm over here panting to young Thai girls, absolutely cranking my shit to Valérie - she sounds like a stunning big-breasted, thin-waisted lass - then out of fucking nowhere, Houellebecq makes his self-insert character happily give up his girl to another nigga, Jerome, for zero fucking reason.So y'know, now I'm just sitting in my chair, limp-dicked, feeling like an absolute cuck with zero ambition to either finish the book or orgasm.Fuck you, Houellebecq, you old gay fuck faggot.
>>24861954Thanks
>>24861460Platform is his book that's easy to deride. It can't be passed off as a rookie mistake and it's inflammatory on purpose. Most people often miss one of his most poignant commentaries though, virtually all males anywhere create a teenager fantasy about sex and it always devolves into more sex with more females. The character and arguably Houllebecq himself achieve realization of the futility and misery inducing nature of this fantasy once it can be done and then proceed to do it anyway.>>24861950Most will probably claim Elementary Particles. It's a good book but it also turns into a manifesto about all the shit no one can do anything about. His social criticism was refined to a point though and the juxtaposition of the 2 main characters is hard to beat.Whatever usually gets overlooked, easy to see why once you read it, if you've ever had experiences like it though you immediately get the genius. If you haven't then you're probably going to think he's had a bad lunch.
>>24861967>Platform is his book that's easy to deride…Don’t get me wrong, I love it. But it’s the one thats going to filter the most first time Houellebecqians>>24861874Is it? I think he was married and had a kid in his 20s but he was already semi-famous by his middle age
are Houellebecq's essays worth reading?
>>24862431I'm struggling to think of a good place to start with Houllebecq but I would agree Platform isn't the ideal starting point.
Why does the civil war basically not exist in American literature
>>24864314niggers
>>24864314Because all of the shitlib redditors and larping trannies who have overtaken the modern Civil War discourse, and transformed the narrative into the righteous anti-fascist north standing up to the treasonous nazi south, all fear this man.
Other than these key scenes, what should I look out for? >Hal’s academic concern interview>Wardine be cry >Marijuana heroic dose >Quebecois assassination>Concave
>>24864304The scat scene in this isn’t anywhere near as erotic as the Jewess in Infinite Jest
>>24864304>Hal and Mario in the bunk beds>Hal clips his toenails>Drug test prep time
In a moment of weakness, I found an AI "smut" writing model that has no limits and doesn't require your emailI am now giving it increasingly deranged and sadistic imputs (brief plot outlines usually involving rape, sexual enslavement, etc.) and it describes them in vivid detailOften I ask it to extrapolate at the endIt writes like a fucking reddit post, but it is still enough to goon toThis has started to consume more than an hour of my time per day
Sounds fun man have a blast
>>24864205For me it was femboy roommates
>>24864205This but with local models, far less redditisms.
>>24864205Post some.
>>24864205What’s the model
I am the last Schopenhauerian alive today.
>>24863387may you reproduce brother, inshallah
what do you think of "basis of morality"?i just finished it and it's interesting that he has compassion as fundament of ethics and also admits that women are intuitively more compassionate, while being bad judges.Also kek at danish philosophical society rejecting it because he talked bad about other philosophers "of the highest standing".Overall I didn't find it convincing because boundless compassion is currently wrecking western countries.
>>24863387We should have little Schopenhauerian babies together
>>24864288Nice try, you succubine foidlet. We will resist the Will and stay celibate as we withdraw from this world. Schopenhauer spoke of this.
Dolores wasn't a heckin groomed abused victim, she was a knowing minx whore slut that knew exactly what she was doing and abused Humbert and exploited him, then left the only man that loved her so she could be a porn star and get pregnant with another mans child
>>24864110>He presents one version of the story while giving hints, through the behaviour of characters outside the main narrator, about another version of the same story.such as? be specific.
>>24864110>a teenager is the same as a toddler actually. biology isn't real, only my feefees>only the (female) victim's perspective is real, never the (male) perpetrator's, except if the victim ever implies she's not a victim, then she's wrong>social norms invented yesterday are actually the eternal foundation of morality and you're super evil if you don't follow them by instinct in their present formulation>(i will also reformulate them again tomorrow to be even more strict, while still pretending they are eternal)>i will never present arguments for any of this, but i WILL continuously call you evil, stupid, sick etc hoping you can be shamed into accepting my ugly victimhood fetish as gospelthis is what happens when you teach women to read. a trembling pile of feminine anxieties pretending to be thought, pretending to be engaging with literature. don't be like this hole, anons.
>>24864110Yeah but 19 yo are ripe af THOUGH fambalam
>>24864282Very based analysis of this clown
>humbert is a heckin unreliable narrator!!!111OK proof with examples cited from the text?>*crickets*
So, what is the value of being a good person?
>>24864038i used to wonder why people felt the need to include chapter & verse numbers in bible quotes. why not treat them like normal quotes, which you can just say on their own. then i thought, they would just look fucking stupid and nonsensical on their own. the fact that it's in the bible is what's important, not what's being said.
Well I am a believer in natural law. Which makes me believe being a good person is not just doing things that your society for the moment happens to consider good, but is also living harmoniously with the world and with nature, being satisfied, happy, in peace.
>>24862922just read the Republic
>>24864049dude these "Christian" guys are all raiding trannies shitting up the threads. Not that I believe Christians have a brain in general but these LARPers on 4chan are definitely just autistic faggots getting a kick out of doing this and taking screencaps, it's their lifedo you really believe that anyone would make these "repent and join Jesus Christ our Lord" on fucking 4chan, unironically
>>24864049It is a Protestant thing, mostly.>>24864297What is this schizo crap?
>folds the moment a competent historian debates himY-Yarvin bros... what happened?
>>24862493That just modernism
>>24864263Mao was a lunatic and horrible at administering the state. Violent mobs and all that, plus he was going actual crazy. Hua was nothing, a layabout for a couple years. Your point is right, but I also tend to think the Party had a real legitimacy crisis on their hands, and Deng made the calculation that most states make. Give the people goodies, they'll re legitimize the state.
>>24864274Hua was specifically chosen by Mao because he wanted a midwit that wouldn't outshine him or do a Khrushchev on him. Mao knew he deserved it, knew how hated he was, and knew the gang of four were about to get wrecked immediately following his death. He was hedging his bet on a relative nobody. You should definitely read China After Mao. Frank Dikoetter goes through the regional archives in the smaller cities instead of just taking what the central government said at face value. The book makes the point you're making about the legitimacy crisis. Government officials would travel to farms, and the farmers would just kill them and hang their bodies from the rafters. People were increasingly being outspoken in how they were sick of communism. Factories just accumulated "war-chests", started trading illegally with one another, and paid bribes to ignore government quotas. And you're right about the goodies, it was becoming embarrassing how good Taiwan, South Korea and Hong Kong were doing by comparison. And people were hearing about life from the Chinese diaspora.
>>24864274I find the Chinese generally not impressive in a general sense.The only reason they ever got a few battles over on us in Korea is because MacArthur was an arrogant jackass. Once Ridgway took charge of things we were slaughtering them with abandon. Let's not forget that they entered the war with a goal of full DPRK control of the peninsula, and then they had to SETTLE for a nonagression pact because they got whopped more than they expected.I'm not really worried about a future war over Taiwan for that reason. They'll get whopped again. It won't be pretty. The Chinese cannot fight Westerners, they're not mean enough.
>>24864285I will check it out. That does sound extremely interesting desu
Interested in seeing how posters on this board score in comparison to /x/, where the overwhelming majority seem to be schizoid sadists or complete autists living in internal fantasy lands:>The CIA uses the PAS for the assessment of characters, its self-assessment online form has 64 outcomes and doesn't sugarcoat anything, if you have bad luck, the test will call you out for being schizophrenic, a recluse, or worse.https://www.pasf.org/pasq/index.htm>To get your type among the 64, take the 'primitive' test first and then type your results into the 'basic' test and take that.The primitive personality type determines your core personality that you developed as a child, while the second test determines whether you outgrew that core personality to adapt well to society, or whether you indulged those core behaviours to become psychologically maladaptive or attain some kind of arrested development. It really does not pull any punches; while an MBTI test will only tell you positive personality traits and leave you to infer the negative, this one is the opposite. Depending on how you score, it will tell you that you're an exceedingly mediocre well-behaved citizen (one of the best endings) or have the profile of a serial killer, autistic shut-in or concentration camp guard.
>>24863443Excessive Masturbation and Maladaptive Daydreaming
>>24863797another IRA anon here, am also surprised at the lack of IRA types on this board in particular. its appraisal is like 90% accurate, especially saying that I was emotionally and intellectually mature as a child prompting lots of adult attention which let me coast into adolescent mediocrity until I forced myself to adapt and become more proactive. also the part about how people view me as passive and inert because the things I find gratifying are intellectual, interior and unknown to everyone else.my basic type was also mostly accurate in that I matured out of the primitive IRA type by becoming more prosocial and charismatic but via social role play, so I make very good first impressions or surface level impressions but end up disappointing close friends and romantic partners because I'm still an autistic shutin at heart who's perfectly content to spend my free time reading textbooks or listening to podcasts where I fantasize about participating
Out of curiosity I answered the primitive test using the knowledge I have about my wife's childhood, school years and family dynamics and the result was also spot on. It described her as an EFU, a personality type that is quite rare in males, which is hypersensitive to any sort of rejection, a pathological obsession with sex & hypochondria as a learned means to attract care and attention. For all the anons claiming the only results are for schizoid autism, consider that the demographics of this website lean heavily towards maladaptive autists.
>>24864196I didn't have autism before I came here. This place makes you that way.
>>24864196I was graded as one of those schizoid autists that will never amount to anything, "at best". Granted, my scores in I and F categories were both low while U wasn't qualified with a number at all. There's definitely some truth in there, but there's a heap of bullshit too. A lot of it is inconsistent or completely incompatible with true schizoid behaviors.
Recommended reading charts (Look here before asking for vague recs).https://mega.nz/folder/kj5hWI6J#0cyw0-ZdvZKOJW3fPI6RfQ/folder/4rAmSZxb>Old:>>24846281>Archive:https://warosu.org/lit/?task=search2&search_subject=sffg>Goodreads:https://www.goodreads.com/group/show/1029811-sffg>Thread Question:Why haven't you read Malazan yet?
Shadows Upon Time released a week after Strength of the Few is insane.
>>24862984they get better but the second book is the start of a 3 books story arc, so if you start book 2 you're not going to get a resolution until book 4.and yes Cyteen is miles better, Downbelow Station is great too
>>24858080>tfw Dying Earth faggots won't touch anything written by somebody inspired by Dying Earth/r/sffg
>>24862984I finally get to post this. Damn those rolling Rs.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEBVNVcAXhU
>>24857712Let me tell you a fact that will be very useful both for understanding yourself and other people: we never like "things" in a vacuum, we like things done WELL. You like harems done well, fantasy done well, and you would like haremfantasy done well too. The problem is that the western authors writing that garbage are terrible at their job. They're like horny middle aged men with no literary merit or background whatsoever who have spent a lifetime watching football not reading books. Mushoku Tensei meanwhile was written by a shut in otaku who had immersed himself in otaku media. He knew his shit, basically. And that is the difference. There's nothing else to it.Whenever you question, "Do I just not like [thing] anymore?", the answer is always that you are simply engaging in bad examples of that thing. When people question if they are getting bored of video games, they just aren't playing good ones (read: ones they would find good). And the answer is never to give up on the thing, it's to find good examples. Although in certain cases, like harem fantasy written by westerners (spit), there may be few to no good examples.
>In 1963, Oppenheimer was asked by The Christian Century magazine what books shaped his “vocational attitude” and his “philosophy on life.”>Here is Oppenheimer’s (unranked) list:>"Les Fleurs du Mal (The Flowers of Evil)" by Charles Baudelaire>“The Waste Land” by T.S. Eliot>“The Divine Comedy” by Dante Alighieri>"Bhagavad-Gita">“Śatakatraya” (“The Three Centuries”) by Bhartrihari>Hamlet by William Shakespeare ">L'Éducation Sentimentale (Sentimental Education)" by Gustave Flaubert>"The Collected Works of Bernhard Riemann" by Bernhard Riemann>"Theaetetus" by Plato>Scientist Michael Faraday’s notebooks (Alternately named "Faraday’s Diary, Being the Various Philosophical Notes of Experimental Investigation made by Michael Faraday")Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>24862086>I am become meme
>>24863059Lol
A very eclectic list.I expected a few modern European novels in there.
bump
>>24863096God just whispered to me that you’re gay
