I am going to buy one as soon as they hit the market in early Novemeber. I hope I get the 1987 edition. It's fire. Which one are you hoping to score?You are going to be getting one right /p/?You aren't gonna be a contrarian try hard no Charmera /p/haggot are you /p/? ISHYDDT
>>4492963There are cheaper fixed focus 'digishits' with far better picture quality – older Kodak and HP cameras come to mind.It's a shame these are so bad as I like the form factor.
>>4492983>cheapernot anymore unless I happen upon one in a thrift store
>>4492986I don't know where you live, but having a quick look at Ebay UK:HP Photosmart 433 3.1mp £12.40.HP Photosmart E317 5.0MP £12.95 plus £2.26 postage.Kodak Digital Camera EasyShare C310 4.0MP £10.80 plus £2.94 Postage.Kodak EASYSHARE CX6200 2.0MP £14.01 or Best Offer.Fujifilm FinePix A Series A202 2.0MP starting bid of £1.16.Packard Bell DSC-220 2.0MP starting bid £3.31.And on it goes. I bet all these have far better image quality.
Film photography is better due to low sensitivity in dark areas. No one needs to see what is in dark areas most of the time. Just imagine this photo with unnecessary crap in shadows.
>>4485702This
Film photos are just pleasing to look at. You can tell when a photo is taken on film.
>>4492047Are these a woman's BREASTS!?On my blue board?!!??!
>>4492714NoHe’s a man, so it’s SFW.
>>4492047It's pleasing because tits, not because film.
So what's your excuse, /p/?
>>4490769I managed to do the same without being nepo, getting into commercial photography really isn't that hard if you just start at entry level but few people want to do that since it zaps your interest.
>>4492912This is the real truth, opportunity cost exists. For every second doing boring commercial photography you could have been photographing trains or naked women instead. Plus also working a full time job paying more than commercial photography. Once you realise this, this guy is basically just fucking up wasting years in a low paying job when could be climbing the corporate ladder, also his job boxes him into only being allowed to shoot boring photos.
Everything becomes annoying soulless shit when you go pro, it's fucking labour, no one will pay you to do something that feels good all the time.
>>4492957The pay is also shit too. People think you get paid a lot, but you don't.
>>4492900That's true, but people forget that somebody from the "higher levels of society" face different challenges. This is an extreme example, but a starving kid in Africa who just wants food and water (which is of course a much worse problem), will never know what it feels like to having to deliver shit for a company for a deadline so you don't get fired and can come home and feed your kids while your wife is nagging you threatening divorce. And if you are a nepo kid but you're actually genuinely talented then you'll face a lifetime of people talking shit about you etc.Yeah some people benefit from having wealthy parents and just get shit handed to them, but it's just become a popular thing to hate more recently. But everybody would do that to their kids if they had the means. It would be important to also teach them the value of what they're getting so they don't squander it or take it for granted, but fucking hell. There's not a parent in the world who wouldn't love to be able to offer their kids stuff like that.
>>4492851
>>4492855
OC
>>4492855>Poppy with my Bronica sq
>>4492918new james cameron avatar lookin good
Reply if you're a real mf'er
>>44914156x6 TLRs are a lot smaller than you'd think.A folder is probably always going to win on compactness, but zone focussing and composing with the brilliant finder on my Ikon 515/2 sucks. My Microcord (Rolleiflex copy for all intents and purposes iirc) is smaller volume wise than my 35mm SLRs.>>4491421I understand the packing purposes issue but personally when I've travelled with my folder I always brought a 35mm SLR anyway because I knew the folder was so limiting.There are a few folding rangefinders, like the Mamiya Six, Voigtlander and Zeiss made them also. You could always get a hotshoe rangefinder and mount it to your folder.tl;dr Like you say if you bring the folder you will want a 35mm also, so the TLR is there if you want to replace both I suppose. Unless your folder has a rangefinder already in which case I think wanting anything further is GAS.
>>4492500>HotshoeI meant cold shoe but you get the pointPicrel is from my Ikon 515/2 on a trip to Vienna where I just had a carry on bag. I still managed to pack my Praktica TL1000. I've done small day hikes with the same set up without issue.
>>4492708kat
>>4483220>sekonic l-308xmost comfy and good for it's price.
contributemostly wanted to experiment with the 'natural' setting on the K10DI think I used -2 saturation, 0 contrast, +1 sharpening but I adjusted it here and thereI also played with color correction in the WB but it wasn't too greatalso, /digishit/ general bread
>>4492439Still not convinced I should keep it.
maow
fujifilm finepix S5200got at thrift store for 10 dollars
literally unmogged even to this day
>>4491626>12MPlollmao even
>what is the d800
>>4491649Same, Bro. I half-filled my freezer with Portra last year.
D700 + Ikelite 200DL + Sugma EX 28/1.8
Random photos you took at night
>>4492008>>4492724cozy
>>4473836
Oldie but a goodie
I went out on the streets late and took some photos tonight with this phone, here they are..
I'm buoyed by the compliments, thanks guys>>4491562No there's CCTV in that park
>>4490749I was thinking something similar. It's cool that the camera is low quality but there's still thought and intention behind every picture. Good work OP, you made something interesting.
>>4491563and if there weren't cctv?
>>4492552
Loved the first one
Previous Thread Image Limit Reached: >>4474697Incidental Northern Mocking bird outside my balcony. Didn't have a picture of one yet.
Pair of many-colored rush tyrant from my first ever roll of film, what do you guys think? Is analog bird photography viable?
>>4492749dial up indian internet?
>>4492749Moving forward, I will attempt to make every image I post exactly 5mb in size, only because I can't post them larger. I would love to post every one as a 500mb 4x upscale TIFF file only so I can see you cry more.
I just got an old digicam and the previous owners didn't delete all the photos. I took a peek and some of the pics are actually kino.
>>4490341He did it on purpose.
Using recuva on about 100 old memory cards I have probably only gotten a couple that had somewhat decent photos on them. It is amazing just how terrible the average snapshitter is and how they all take the same type of shitty photos. One card had a ton of folders on it spanning over several years where they had taken photos of everything from baptisms to funerals.. all family events. One card had several full frontal nudity photos of an elderly man taken in the mirror on vacation. It feels somewhat wrong to peek into the lives of others though.
>>4489096Postem!
I got some on a digishit I bought for cheap, but they're boring: two cars, probably photographed for a listing. And some family photos with a baby.
Once bought a used camera phone that contained a video of a guy doing an uncanny voice impersonation of Herbert the Pervert from Family Guy.
lemme see your shots for the moon!this is mine btw captured with canon 2000d 55mm i can not remember my camera settingsi gave it some edit with lightroom this is first time with DSLR
>>4488213Oops. Sept. 10, 2015.
ZV-E10 + SEL55210 taken last week iirc, obviously cropped
Best I can do with a Ricoh GR
photos of my cat Rupert that i took on my phone which at least trace amounts of thoughtful composition, as per the board rules I like this shot because it really focuses on his face, which is cute
>>4491431Looks like a tiger on the preview
middle child of another cat and the corgi
>>4476475You fucking nigger chud kill yourself
birds edition
>is this the POWER ofhello where are you?
why is there always someone seething whenever a m43 threat opens?Are m43 really that bad or whats up with anons malding over them?
>>4492832the photos are very, very low quality, about on the level of a sony rx100, maybe worse, see>>4458580maybe up to aps-c shitter with less than ideal settings quality if they know how to use a camera, see>>4490289but a few of the gearfag users (om5 idiot and g9ii thirdie) are irritating gearfags with obvious psychological issues, notorious for incessantly shilling these digishits as superior with a bunch of ass-backwards misunderstood math, and incessantly shilling against fuji and sony because the a7c and xe5 are really better choices than any new m43 nowone of them is "going away" which we all hope meant "committing suicide" because his incessant gearfaggotry (over $5000 USD spent, 12+ hrs per day spent between 4chan and taking the same test photo of the same tree over and over) leaked into real life and cost him his home, wife, son, and marriage so perhaps micro four thirds can be a /dst/ copy again, full of people with $250 em5 mk2s who literally cant afford full frame, as it was always meant to be
>>4492837Whatever floats your boat, sweatie.
>>4492832That's all poopco he's basically our village idiot
What are the best socials or search engines nowadays to discover relatively good photography?I've found Pinterest (without the adds) to have the best recommendations by far until now. What the hell happened to Instagram? Something that was born to be focused on photography in the 2010s became some sort of life people's blogs. Not even that, the recommendations are absolutely horrible, worst than things like Youtube. Sadly, it's one of the only ways for some kind of online social presence, and if you opt out of it, you regress to anonymity.I remember there were some online Russian sites who used to archive good stuff, like gallery.ru
>>4491761holy shit I thought you were talking shit so looked up the s5 pro.https://www.flickr.com/groups/fujis5/pool/with/54494318943That looks so much better than the z9 photos its not funny. I even had to look up what was going on sensor wise, its a CCD. Why the fuck isnt this technology getting pushed? this is the type of thing I would actually want
>>4491762An s9 photo.This is very good color for digital, some of the best ive seen.
>>4491762CCD isnt doing the colors its limited editing latitude (CCD has almost no DR) making the manufacturer write good data instead of lots of data and the users having better taste on average (digital MF and nicer canon DSLRs write lots of data but the users shoot and edit better as well)
browse the PDF outputs of FIAP salons. endless fun seeing the best of the best boomer photographyhere's a list. just look at the previous years winners and stuff. endless hours of entertainment.https://www.myfiap.net/patronages?field_fiap_patronage_number_value_2=&title=&title_1=&name=&field_profile_org_name_value=&custom_category=All&custom_section=All&field_cntst_sched_closing_date_value_op=%3D&field_cntst_sched_closing_date_value%5Bvalue%5D=&field_cntst_sched_closing_date_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_cntst_sched_closing_date_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_cntst_sched_exhibit_date_value_op=%3D&field_cntst_sched_exhibit_date_value%5Bvalue%5D=&field_cntst_sched_exhibit_date_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_cntst_sched_exhibit_date_value%5Bmax%5D=&has_salon_catalog=All&has_salon_file=All&items_per_page=50&order=field_cntst_sched_closing_date&sort=desc&page=1
>>4491761your a fucking snoy using nigger bitch
