New Graphics Edition Previous Thread: >>107724782
>>107838067thanks>>107838216another one who gave upweak fall first
>>107837835Not the anon who requested, but could you please make some monogatari tiles. Kiss shot, Hitagi, Ononoki etc. Love your work.
>>107839402Not sure king, I found him on one of troon porn subreddits but I can't remember the name and cba search. You could maybe find it through her name, I remember she was also leashed in the video and looked high. Pretty cute.
uwu
>>107841162looks good but why is the font so blurry?
>>107813446NTAI tried wsl but its too fucking slowTUI apps like vim were unusable in it.I also tried bash via msys and that worked fine but I never bothered to port all of my batch scripts, shell config, plugins and keybinds over.It would probably be fine but honestly the command prompt with clink+extensions is very comfy.Some day I'll take the time to configure everything in bash and then switch over.Or maybe I'll just learn it for scripting purposes while keeping cmd as my interactive shell.
>>107807946juicier than the genderswapped version of him
>>107808994I didn't even look at this page before. Damn people who don't use vim as a manpager make me think less of humanity. The manual is still trying to sell me the program. It's actually fucking subile shit.
>>107808994It's the manpage equivalent of people who talk about reading in the library.
>>107806560fpbpEnjoy having your scripts fail OP.
Light themes are objectively superior to dark themes, why do so many people still choose dark?
>>107835866>objectively superiorYour brain is too small to be worth addressing if those words ever cross your lips.
>>107835866tobh I have astigmatisms in both eyes and for any dark theme all the text creates shards and haze that makes it really hard to read. When websites for instance don't provide a light theme, it's actually much harder for me to use their website. It isn't just about preference, it makes it physically harder for me to use their website> vitrectomy> laser surgeryOr I could just use light themes
>>107841521Solarized light is the sweetspot for me, and maybe some other beige theme. White backgrounds stress my eyes, black backgrounds create halos.
>>107835866No. They are better for reading regular text, but for programming, they are objectively worse. Syntax highlighting in bright themes is horrible.On a dark theme, you can use bright colors, which have good contrast with a dark background, and with each other. For a light background, you are forced to either have little contrast with the background, or make the 'colors' dark, and reduce their contrast between each color, making the whole thing almost pointless.
>>107835866oh..
Linus Torvalds (Linux creator) praises vibe coding
>>107839241>Isn't Linus someone who barely writes his own code.He's also someone who lets trannies and corporations take over his legacy and by his own admission, gets approached by glowgroids. I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up fully jumping on the AI scam bandwagon. He's getting old and clearly wants to stay relevant as things continue to slip away from him.
>>107841110>>midwits take his sponsored readme at face valueAre you talking about yourself or what? How does your American (read: nonwhite) greentext attempt relate to my point?
>>107841124Most boring bait I've seen this year. Have a pity (you).
>>107841216>token-guessing Americoon retard tries to compensate for its confusion with a fully generic non-reply
He is an old man, his brain is getting softer every day. Also he is a normie with wife and kids, such life softens a person even further. He is simply too soft now, not the same die-hard programmer he was back in his prime.
kde devs can't even make a calculator right
>arguing about which undefined behaviour is the right one>2011+15ISHYGGDT
>>107837721lel>>107838952Parentheses are such an ugly solution for grouping things desu. I don't have a superior alternative, I just don't like it.
>>107831960Obvious retard, but this is gotta be the most miserable looking calc ever. Vibecoded af.
>>107839669I'm not changing them, the calculator does it on its own.
>>107831960>kde 6nuff said
Were CRTs really that much better than the displays of today?>tfw Björk knows more about technology than /g/https://youtube.com/watch?v=75WFTHpOw8Y
>>107834422Agreed. Almost all debates about how good CRT's boil down to "I am a tranny who loves the 90s."
>>107825321No.
>>107837235It's true. It's always some boomer or nostalgia larping zoomed who keep shilling this shit.
>>107825551Oh yeah, like what?
>>107830820>for reading/creating text, never.Clueless take. You do know the whole ClearType thing was invented specifically to address aliasing issues inherent to LCD displays, right?>muh flickeringCRTs only visibly flicker below 75Hz.
What was the most disturbing thing you've found on the dark web?
>>107795078There are still sites using the .su domain set up by the USSR, Russia administers them but they will show up as USSR
>>107792748Pizza with animals.Not even the dark web, just regular internet, but this was way back in like 2003 when everything was much less regulated and monitored.
>>107838983ok so two people out of hundreds of thousands. both were controversies
>>107840026I have two on the top of my head and only one of them was widely reported on. How many do I have to look up to prove to you that the purpose of a system is what it does and giving the government any incentive to end the lives of its citizens in objectively a bad thing
>>107793367kys
>>107838231I'm sure it'll be even more bad and gay than we can imagine.
>>107838231It's not too much off already. Some websites look pretty much like this without an adblocker.
>>107838502I watched Die Hard on VHS on my CRT TV on Christmas Eve, then Home Alone on Boxing Day.
>>107838231It will eventually transform into an aislop prompt and everything stored up to that point will become almost impossible to search but not quite, kinda like the dejanews archive.
>>107838231Youtube will become You-dian. Sorting by upload date and all you get are fucking indians.Youtube need a filter by country. Fucking PAJEETS spamming their shit on youtube.
Are LLMs demonic technology or are its users too dumb & gullible to become psychotic due to them?
>>107840586LLMs are demon tech. Using it as a replacement for social connection is about as bad as getting addicted to hard drugs.Although the bigger negative affect is the widespread usage of AI to obscure the truth and bombard people with mind-rotting garbage.And the systematic copyright infringement by multi-billion giga-corpos.That said, they can do some menial tasks for you and the only downside from that is the risk of your skills (and general intelligence) atrophying.I sometimes use LLMs to save me 5 minutes of writing a script.>>107840606there's been multiple cases of healthy people with a strong social life, with no prior history of mental health issue, going psychotic after using AI too much.It's not just the already insane who then happen to use AI to live out their insanity.
>>107840757>multiple cases of healthy people with a strong social life, with no prior history of mental health issueEven if that's true they were probably low IQ and believed whatever the LLM was trying to roleplay with them
>>107840586It's literally inherently demonic technology. You know that schizo meme about making ways to speak without speaking? It's unironically that. The seals of Solomon are breaking and we are witnessing a second falling of Man.
>>107841402>You know that schizo meme about making ways to speak without speaking?Your emphysemic grandma trying to call you downstairs for your 34th birthday chicken nuggies must be a nightmare for you.
LLMs aren't demonic. The fact seemingly healthy people go crazy from interacting with LLMs just goes to show that a lot of people are very fragile mentally and normal societal interactions have kept them steady.They likely would have been taken in by cults if they were exposed to them as well.
>breaks every site>have to whitelist any site you want to see anywaywhats the point
>>107839429Only good if you are paranoid about js in general, like for the people on tor or something. Which you shouldn't be on in the first place.
>>107839429Nobody uses this but tor pedophiles
>download this thing called "noscript">wahhhh why aren't my scripts runningidk what to tell you
Noscript should be default imo. I don't know why we type in 'go to this webpage' and our browser just auto downloads a bunch of other random stuff. I just want the webpage. Not the ads. Not anything else.
>>107839513I guess that's true ... wait, no, it isn't, which is related to domains like trafficjunky being a thing. Also, I have not loaded JS from the Zuck in, like, years.
Hong Xiuquan Taiping Rebellion edition
fucking kill me broswasted an entire goddamn YEAR doing RLHF slave work, clicking yes/no on basedjack outputs like a good little goyfinally starting to make some actual moneythen ONE single power-tripping retard pajeet reviewer flags me for literal nothingaccount nuked, perma-banned, year of my life down the absolute shitternow I'm staring at python job listings like a fucking retards because I don't remember a single fucking thingdecorators? generators? context managers? leetcode mediums? my brain is literal soupwhat's the fastest way to cram this dogshit back into my skull?neetcode 150? some 12-hour udemy pajeet course? just paste the best cope roadmap before I rope
found this job poasting if anyone wants to apply. 4 day work week. insanehttps://stack-influence.breezy.hr/
>>107839671neet / leetcode 150 is the absolute bare minimum u need to even have a chance of passing general coding interviews in this market unless u have some autistic niche stack / frameworks experience. If u want to actually have a good chance you need to solve like 300 leetcode hards.
>>107839671neetcodeput each problem statement in an Anki deck with the solution. Periodically run through them to make sure you don't forget.Neetcode 75 -> 150
>>107839229Same. Not at the same location, right? RIGHT? Where is it? You tell me NOW. Cancel your interview RIGHT NOW.
https://loss32.org/Which one of you weeaboos is creating this project?
>>107832589yeah the intent seems to be run entirely windows software on top of a small a linux kernel as possible. so you boot into environment and stay there and never really interact with kneesocks after that. i think it's an interesting idea.
isn't this shit literally just reactos
>>107834729No, I commented about >>107832685 wanting to use Xorg. >>107832685>in Xorg
>>107834746if it doesn't I'm making it. the linux userspace is just way too pozzed by redhat to be of anything good.
>>107832504How many Zoomers would even understand what this is referencing.
> be me, scrolling on instagram> see video about haveibeenpwned.com> get curious, check my passwords & email> yes, i have been pwnedSo geniuene question, where can i read the list of pwned passwords? Where do i get this?My email got breached in a "breach of the internet archive" from archive.org. Where do i read my info (and other people's info?)
don't worry about it goy
>>107841365This >>107841372What are you worried about? Obviously you aren't a retard and using gayfaggot123 as your password for every account, right?
>>107841365This we need raw data sets. I rather manually check for "my" email then to enter it into some website.
Breachforums
>>107841451Think for more than 2 seconds about why raw datasets wouldn't be released via official channels. Also, learn to Google and you'll find almost all the datasets HIBP has.
>/g/ makes an 18th albumTheme: Outer Space MusicTitle: [Accepting suggestions]Deadline: 14th of January>/g/ makes a 19th albumTheme: [Accepting suggestions]>Song submission rules/guidelinesUpload the file somewhere, preferably in a lossless format, and post the link here. If you want to update your track, make a new post.Include the song title in the post, and make it clear that your song is a submission for the album.Optionally you may include cover art for your track, but please confirm that the image in your post is the cover art or it won't be included. You may not use your real artist name.Songs that contain anything against YouTube's policies won't be uploaded on YT, but will still be added to the album.By default, tracks will be normalised to -14 LUFS (integrated loudness) in the release. You may specify a lower loudness for your track.Use of AI is banned. This includes AI generated stems, samples, and effects. "AI" includes all neural network-based models and not hard-coded automation/procedural generation. You are allowed to ask an LLM about music-related questions, but asking it to give you musical ideas (eg. generating a chord progression) is already a no-no.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmCZPzf-GHEohnonono check 3:30
imagine living in the year 2026, and people are still absurdly in denial about analog gear, even people who ostensibly are calling themselves (((musicians))) and some anons have taken an interest in music production for several decades but not been able to turn it into a career outside of grinding DJing gigs and such
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REhNaUCA8asthen there are cringe cuck takes like this in fucking 2026
>>107841251>3:24>that chair!?!
>>107841387>interest in music production for several decades but not been able to turn it into a career outside of grinding DJing gigs and suchAs if you'd turn any different. Oh, yeah: no DJing gigs and such.
How come C# isn't more popular when it's basically Java but better? Is it because people distrust a language maintained by Microsoft, or does the JVM have non-obvious but crucial advantages over the CLR?
>>107834339The standard library has generally very nice naming conventions.But go try explain the difference between NET Framework, .NET Core and .NET (by which I mean .NET 5 and up)..NET in itself is already a godawful name for a general purpose computing platform that isn't really focused on web shit at all.
>>107838989And remember, Microsoft was waging a proxy war on Linux via SCO at the time C# arrived. It was not just Windows only, it was hostile to other platforms for a long time. Everyone assumed the Mono developers would eventually be sued out of existence by Microsoft.
What's the consensus on msbuild when it comes to C# development?Usually I see people hating on it, although I'm not sure if that comes more from C++ devs working with it.I had to get a little bit more in-depth with it recently, and I found it to be rather pleasant.Modern msbuild is very flexible and expressive.and consise IMO.I do hate how the most popular IDE for csharp (VS) basically hides all that flexibility from the average dev cause they wanna give people fucking GUIs to configure their builds, and solution files are an absolute disaster even with the recent modernization efforts.But ignoring those is easy if you don't use VS and then you just have a good (and starndardized) build system.It being standardized is also worth alot.
>macroslopjust fuck off
>>107836370Not a C# user, but wasn't MAUI supposed to be the .NET cross platform GUI library?
