How can you debate free will if you believe it doesn't exist at the end of the day?
>>217372067>how can you not believe it was out of free will?How can you determine that it was? The literal chemical makeup of your brain can determine your answers and choices. Your muscles move from a signal the brain sent moments before you decided to pick up the object.
>>217372013How many of you had the choice of where you were born? How many of you had the choice of who your parents were? How many of you had the choice of what elementary school you attended? How many of you had the choice of whether or not you were gonna get molested by your priest? If the answers to all of those are, "I didn't have a choice, then guess what?" You don't have free will.>BUT I HAVE CHOICES AFTER THAT!All those choices were made after you were molded by the experiences you had no say in. Including your height, your face, your race, your brain, so on and so on. Free will is an illusion that we've conjured up so that we don't slowly start to lose our minds because of existential dread. Ironically, those of you "choosing" not to subscribe to determinism are likely doing so out of an inherent defense mechanism you have ZERO control over. Anyway, it doesn't matter one way or another. Believe or don't believe what you want. None of us have any control over each other. :)
>>217375221Adding an All-knowing Omnipotent God just complicates it. It creates a paradox. If God knows all and created it all then God controls the will of the creations. Yet people have the free will to deny a God exists?
>>217372013>How can you debate free willYou can debate the interpretation of "free will" since it's a concept, an idea, a thought, consisting of two words, which meanings aren't set in stone, words we human use a means of communication, linking together the thoughts we have among us. By debating these words, concepts, thoughts, ideas we seek to reach a clearer comprehension of them. Asking how you can debate such a thing exposures an inmature grasp of humanity, it's existance and its limitations.
well, as a tiny little penis boy with a barely functioning white pecker doodle that spurts out baby loads of toxic nut sludge unfit for continuing my dying race, my opinion doesn't matter for much does it?
>The.Rip.2026.1080p.NF.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.264-FLUX>The.Rip.2026.1080p.NF.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.264-FLUX>The.Rip.2026.1080p.NF.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.264-FLUX>The.Rip.2026.1080p.NF.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.264-FLUX>The.Rip.2026.1080p.NF.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.Atmos.H.264-FLUXMatt and Ben are back, baby!Fuck theaters!
>>217375555nah, he was doing great movies at the start of his career and Boss level was fun
>>217375521At least one.
>>217375599Looks like a David Ayer cop flick cast.
>>217375599kino cast ngl. scott adkins, teyana taylor, and mattfleck
Kino premise but I can tell by the trailer that it's total slop.Anyone know of something similar that isn't slop? Cops or anyone finding a large sum of illegal money and trying to figure out what to do?Not counting the obvious ones like The Shield, A Simple Plan or No Country.
>Terminator 1>Heavily implied Novikov self-consistency principle; future cannot be altered, and attempts to alter the future result in it occurring (Reese getting with Sarah Connor creates John Connor, the Terminator's hand allows SkyNet to reverse engineer)>Terminator 2>lol actually you can change the futureDoes Cameron not understand how time travel works, or did Gale Anne Hurd and William Wisher do the heavy lifting for the scripts and just weren't on the same page?
>>217375485>T2 shits on T1's time travel mechanics.NTA but so what if it does? T2 makes both films better by making the future alterable.
>>217371162You fail to understand that there are multiple interpretations of time travel's function in fiction. Terminator 1 is pretty heavily implied to follow the Novikov self-consistency principle, even if the characters don't know it. Kyle being sent back isn't an alteration, because he had always shown up in the past.>>217370005>Besides, self-consistency is dumb as fuckSelf-consistency is the only smart time travel mechanic. The only other way to get around the bootstrap paradox is essentially dimensional birthing due to the butterfly effect rather than actual time travel.
>>217375498Making the future alterable is fucking dumb. Worst form of time travel that isn't even really time travel.
>>217375541>Making the future alterable is fucking dumbWhy? Making the future absolutely set removes any stakes from the films. If the future is set then Sarah is not actually in danger at any point in the first film.>that isn't even really time travel.>Characters travelling back in time isn't time travelRight, sure.
>>217375614>Making the future absolutely set removes any stakes from the films.Making it so that any jackass can just go further back and erase everything that happened in the film is what removes the stakes. Nothing has any purpose or meaning when it's all chance that can be obliterated by the act of time travelling alone.>>Characters travelling back in time isn't time travelIf the future can be altered, then they aren't really travelling back in time. They're travelling to or creating an alternate timeline/dimension, one where they did travel back in time.
Remember The Unborn? It was a pretty good horror.
>>217373848It probably didn't I don't remember much
pusy
>>217373731I only remember the poster.
>>217375528nice
>>217375528That was my first thought too
The Assasination of Jesse James by the Retard Robert Ford
>>217375445You know what fuck you
Black Retard (reduntant)
>>217374284aka Triple Threat
Retard from New YorkRetard from LADirty RetardTotal RetardRetard in SeattleThe Great RetardBe Kind RetardWhere Retards DareSaving Retard RyanThe Retard of OzFist Full of RetardsFor a Few Retards MoreThe Seven RetardsEver Which Way but RetardRetard RidgeComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>217375593Saving Private Retard
The Great Debate
>>217365051>They just hate everything about this character because they think it's sexist and re-enforcing harmful stereotypes.Women with big boobas don't exist anon.
>boomers were jizzing in their pants over this
>>217369237I'm a fan of batman so maybe I guess it's ok if I stare as manlet bruce wayne in the next movie
>>217361607Proof body is more important than face
>>217373607Google search Sophie Howard. There are plenty of other options, but that's one example for you.
Holy f*cking kino
>>217375425kek her breath most likely reeks of greasy jew ass lips 24/7
>>217372347She's been vindicated because this will be the first kino in her filmography.
>>217366345I was genuinely impressed by it. Even better than the one before. Having Kelson and Jimmy Dimanonds as the main characters was a great decision. I also loved the Jimmies.
>>217372347And she actually delivered a pretty good movie this time.
>>217375562I wish samson ripped the jimmys to pieces
How can we make Chinese filmgoers more accepting of diversity?
constantly i am reminded that china was africa tier not even 60 years ago and rose to world superpower in a lifetime whilst africa has relatively stagnated
>>217374776>Reading up baizuoHow does a country across an ocean with a totally different culture nail the essence of leftism so accurately?
>>217375591It is curious because there isn't a lot of mutual intelligibility between chinese and english speakers. I guess leftoids' faggotry is just that apparent.
>>217375591they also have "wumao" who are paid western shills they laugh at. For example look up uighur china on twitter and you will find tannkie pilled memes, despite china having total muslim death squads
>>217375384I think I'll use my credit card. Do you guys have anything non dairy? Anything gluten free?
>time is a fat circle
>>217373183>You know, real gravey shit
>a man without a meal can be a bad thing
>In philosophical terms, I'm what's called a glutonist. Means I eat at parties.
>>217373183>you think a man can love two fast food restaurants at once
>hey, hey, do you think because I talked to him about my second breakfast, I might of got it eaten?>Probably had something to do with it. I don't think you should have shown him those menus, do you?
DON'T watch House of the Dragon. HBO done fucked with our boy and lad, George R.R. Martin.>“It’s worse than rocky, it’s abysmal. I hired Ryan. I thought Ryan and I were partners. And we were all through the first season. I would read early drafts of the scripts. I would give notes. He would change some things. It was working really well — I thought.”>When Ryan came to loggerheads with original Dragon co-showrunner Miguel Sapochnik, Ryan asked for Martin’s support in their dispute, and got it (Sapochnik left the show after season one).>“Then we got into season two, and he basically stopped listening to me. I would give notes, and nothing would happen. Sometimes he would explain why he wasn’t doing it. Other times, he would tell me, ‘Oh, OK, yeah, I’ll think about that.’ It got worse and worse, and I began to get more and more annoyed. Finally, it got to a point where I was told by HBO that I should submit all my notes to them and they would give Ryan our combined notes.”>Martin says he can’t say anything beyond this. But sources say Martin and Condal’s relationship deteriorated further and came to a head during a Zoom call with the show’s producers and some HBO executives. The purpose of the call was for Condal to present his vision for season three. After Condal spoke, Martin detailed his many objections and allegedly declared, “This is not my story any longer.”>After their contentious Zoom call, HBO asked Martin to step back from Dragon altogether. A few months later, the author was brought back aboard. “I can’t talk about it,” Martin says.>“George and Ryan had a disagreement on the direction of season three,” an HBO insider says. “At that point, it was clear that the process and communication with them was broken and needed a reset. So there was naturally a period where everyone took a step back for a while until we could figure out a new way forward.”
>>217375280Depends on the outcome
>>217357981I had to look this ryan guy up, how the fuck did he get put in charge of this?
>>217375280Are you five? You can criticize and banter about stuff or someone you ultimately enjoy. He made a decently entertaining fantasy series, he's still got all the callings of a hippy boomer, including a terrible work ethic, and it's fun to meme about it
>>217371478So what fantasy themes LOTR defined are being subverted in ASOIAF? Aren't you thinking more of the publisher mandated themes in US fantasy books?
>>217373570Why did you have an old man? What were you doing with him?
>>217367442Working with conan made her slip back to her eating disorder ways
>>217367430She's a good actress
>>217369176the last line isn't accurate btw, just anon's lightly sadistic fantasy
>>217367430What kind of person would want to read this?
>>217367450>you're a pedo if you prefer 'Then'
Recommend films that appeal to the male gaze
>>217375439Something about tiktok that just really irks me. All these faggot retards setting up their phones and then doing these dumb little dances in vertical mode, and then they upload it onto the internet for attention. Twats.
>>217375439Any Andy Sidaris film.
Reminder it's a Neo-Freudian concept, and the pop-feminist explanation actually conflates it with objectiviation theory. The actual original essay this is based on is completely schizophrenic and it's largely just scenes of men looking at women. It's a "fuzzy" concept at best, and isn't pinned down to one definition.
>>217375474who touched you anon
>>217375474I can put up with it if its only hot girls getting naked while dancing
She owns a catShe's 40She is childlessShe's quirky!She loves her own companyShe has a dry sense of humorShe enjoys quiet morningsShe values her independenceShe has strong opinionsShe’s comfortable being herself
>40 year old single woman with cat/s>People assume she's mentally unstable>40 year old single man with cat/s>People assume he's a closeted homosexualThis seems like unfair stereotyping even if one of these is generally accurate.
>>217375419Based woman in control sticking it to the chuds>>217375524Cringe incel who is probably a pedophile
>>217375542Cringe maybe but definitely not an incel or a pedo
>>217375538My ex and I got this cat 16 years ago.
>>217375419she likes the dark
70+ detailed pages have already been put together to build a new era of Star Wars.
>>217375499they don't deserve any
>>217371161>a BIGGER death star!
>>217371161I looked at the quote tweets for this post, and the first thing I see is an account called "The Modern Golem" defending it. You can't make this shit up.
>>217374875>or Avellonereddit is down the hall to the left
>>217375581A Golem defends jews, he is just Jewish, makes sense.
Does this look good or like crap? I need to know what /tv/ thinks so I can copy the opinion as my own
>>217374774but not the face
>>217370514She's british at least.
>>217370514Tiddy too smol and doesn't look athletic enough plus I know she can't act.
>>217370514Not enough tits, not enough ass, not thicc enough, no athletic build.Jesus, how fucking hard is it for Hollywood to cast correctly?
>>217374394Famke was god tier woman.
