No entry without authorization.Previous: >>107785091
>>107830754hes a jobless retard
>>107830787Ooh, I love Asteroids!
>>107830787wtf is this lmao is this made in mf rust kekw
>>107828828what exactly is the issue?
>>107821750just use ai to review the pr.slop gets slop.this is what the industry wants
Use case for Vsync? I never seem to notice frame tearing in-game and every time I do turn Vsync on I can feel input lag.
>>107831433>You're actually having worse latency compared to limiting FPS.>>107831444>Mailbox would give worse frametimes in general compared to manual limiting.explain
>>107831331Triple buffering adds no latency because drivers do their draw call buffering in the background regardless.
>>107829458Vsync doesn't have a performance impact in any modern game. It only ever had a performance impact in poorly written games that sequentially ran input sampling, game update, and render, on the same thread.
>>107829823>If you play in windowed mode then there's no screen tearing because dwm.Multi-Planar Overlays (MPO) called. They want you to know you're wrong.MPO gives each window its own hardware-overlay where compositing them bypasses the DWM and is directly done on the graphics card. This also means each individual window gets access to the real vsync signal. Aaa--nd each individual window can experience tearing, if it chooses not to use vsync.This is also infinite amounts of fun with old games that deny you the ability to enable vsync when choosing borderless or windowed rendering modes. Because then you have to force it through the Nvidia or AMD control panel software. And sometimes that isn't quite compatible, because some games e.g. use different frame pacing logic when their game-internal vsync option is enabled or disabled. So you get a choice between tearing or stutter-fest.What helps with that is that on modern versions of Windows, both 10 and 11, next to MPO there's also a 'game optimizations' feature. What this does is turn D3D requests for exclusive full screen rendering context, into non-exclusive fullscreen. So you can configure those older games to render in 'full screen' instead - which allows you to enable their vsync option - while in actuality that particular Windows 'game optimizations' feature will force them to render borderless / non-exclusive. (And because of MPO, vsync will still work.)
>>107831775 (cont.)Ofcourse, this isn't a perfect solution either, because MPO is not supported on all DXGI blit modes (yey!).So for games that use an unsupported blit mode, configuring them to render exclusive fullscreen (aka true fullscreen) while the game optimizations feature is enabled, will actually have them render as non-exclusive fullscreen (aka borderless) and without MPO, vsync won't work.The game optimizations feature is a GLOBAL feature.So enjoy toggling that fucker on and off on a game by game basis; as need arises.And ofcourse- it's hidden deep inside the modern Settings app, something like 6 or so clicks deep.Because Microsoft cannot get ANYTHING right.
Hytale uses QUIC for multiplayer. What do you think about it? Is this the first reasonably popular game that implements multiplayer over QUIC instead of using TCP or their own custom protocol on top of UDP?
>>>/v/>>>/lgbt/
>>107831502I think you're expecting too much from /g/. Nobody here has ever designed something as complex as an online games protocol and nobody here understands what using QUIC gives you over TCP and what you give up in exchange, especially in expensive server setups.At most, you'll get some schizo off his meds complaining that "THE TRANNIES!!!!!" are getting rid of TCP to further their goals of world domination or something.
>>107831502all quic data goes to google. you just played yourself.
>What phone has X and Y feature?Don't ask, use these!https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3https://www.kimovil.com/en/compare-smartphoneshttps://phonedb.net/index.php?m=device&s=queryGood Resources:>Reviewshttps://www.gsmarena.comhttps://www.phonearena.comhttps://www.notebookcheck.net>Frequency Checkershttps://www.frequencycheck.comhttps://kimovil.com/en/frequency-checkerComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>107830970lying piece of shit
>>107831566
OP has been ruining SPG for months by hijacking it and constantly posting fake misinformation. Every spg OP image is a fake nitpicked image trying to start arguments. Literally breaks the rule of not instigating flamewars for months without any intervention. You are just lying and making things up and ruining the thread.The baker was exposed btw.see:>107777408>>107782611 >>107782842 >>107793716 >>107794810 >>107794871
>>107831723Why do you insist on being delusional?
>>107809453>>107794810The baker is the anon with a Galaxy z fold. See: >>107807800 who lies and trolls spg. >>107807838Android just like iOS and any other software is not bug free. Once again the iPhone flamewar starting spg baker is nitpicking one sided issues.
Apple says Face ID is more secure than Touch ID but is that even true?Sure, Face ID is statistically less likely to return a false positive with random faces because faces are more diverse than fingerprints are but fingerprints are more randomly distributed, so the odds that you know someone who shares enough facial features with you (say, biological family members, for instance) to trigger a false positive have to be higher than someone you know having a similar enough fingerprint. Even though faces can potentially be more different between individuals, fingerprints are less often shared between people the user and people who regularly appear in his life, who are the most likely people to attempt to unlock his devices without his permission. Additionally, if you're holding someone else's phone in their presence, I'd imagine it's harder to unlock their phone against their will by taking them by surprise with Touch ID than it would be with Face ID. With Face ID, all the user has to do is glance at the device for even a split second. With Touch ID, you need to place your finger -- the right finger -- on the sensor and press. It's a more involved and intentional process, but also a more convenient one because you don't have to uncover your face or position yourself correctly or make eye contact with the device in order to initiate the unlock sequence. Shouldn't it also be harder to fabricate a counterfeit fingerprint than it would be to create a mask realistic enough to unlock the device?Basically, Touch ID seems just better than Face ID across the board. The only practical upside to Face ID I can think of is the ability to read notification details without touching the device. Is there something I'm not considering here or are fingerprint sensors just better than facial recognition?
>>107830213>criminalsThe police can just hold your phone to your face to unlock it and the courts have allowed it.
>>107830640that was google photos, which uses a different type of facial recognition. you'd have to get real close to an actual gorilla to even try it with face id
>>107830658>>107830625Anon I think you're conflating Face Unlock (Android; uses RGB "selfie" cam) with Face ID (uses TrueDepth, separate from the selfie camera).Taking a photo or video of the device's owner only works with Face Unlock because Face Unlock is purely software and just scans the camera feed for what looks like a face before comparing that face to the one on file. Face ID looks for shape, not color. It uses lasers to create a depth map of whatever objects are in front of it and compare that shape to the one on file. If you hold up a photo of the registered face, the TrueDepth camera won't see the photo. It'll just see the shape of whatever object is supposed to be displaying it. So, a hand holding a rectangle. And since neither of those shapes resemble a human head, it wouldn't trigger a false positive. This is also why Face ID works in pitch black darkness and Face Unlock does not, and why Face ID doesn't care about things like makeup or lighting.
>>107830292>cop grabs your phone>puts it up in front of your face>phone is unlockedMy phone only opens with a pin
>>107830777>be a BTFO Andjeet Retard>UHHHHH SUCKING COCKSvery telling
Everything is already from China, but here we discuss the cheap chink shit you see on various sites.1st rule of /csg/: If it looks too good to be true, it probably is.Useful links>TWS IEM reviews: www.scarbir.com/>Guide: csg-guide.neocities.org/>Wiki: https://igwiki.lyci.de/wiki/Chink_Shit_General>What headphones/earbuds should I buy?>>>/g/iemg>I want a cheap smartphone what should I buy?>>>/g/spg/>I want to buy some sort of emulation device>>>/vr/hhg/Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
also how many of the prints on ali clothing are ai generated now?wtf is this text
>>107831469>chinese stuff
He's right, you know?
>>107829876Bro. This is pathetic. Weren't there actual pedos congregating Bluesky?
>>107831662Bluesky has actual moderationX has a gazillion porn bots that post literal CP hourly
>>107831674>Bluesky has actual moderationthat deletes anything non-reddit
>>107831678I'd rather have any "real discussion" deleted than be on a platform that allows CP under the guise of "freezepeach"
>>107829876now do netflix
debating popos cosmic, or nix with cosmic.nix means running random binaries is a pain in the asscosmic apps don't support other language input yet apparently.straight white male btw.
>>107829174>straight white male btw.Posts East-Asian tranny.
>>107827458both of those fruity though
>>107829174>straight white male btw.it was obvious already because you posted a rice queen
>>107826540I'm new to linux and was gonna go with Pop but this Cosmic shit scared me away.Went with Cachy instead with KDE.Was beginner friendly enough for me, and critically was running wayland since I have a dual monitor setup with different refresh rates which apparently X11 can't handle for some reason.
Why did /g/ stop being anti-systemd?
>>107828509How does this affect me?
>>107821629>I keep flirting with the idea of building a new Linux distro based around s6+pkgsrcHave you used VoidLinux? What's your take on it?It uses runit though
>>107817360When /g/ became /g/ay and wanted a piece of that sweet pottering bussy
>>107818189It's not portable, doesn't work on the other Unix-likes and variants, etc
>>107827366>Sadim???
>Read the sticky: >>105076684>GNU/Linux questions >>>/g/fglt>Windows questions >>>/g/fwt>PC building? >>>/g/pcbg>Programming questions >>>/g/dpt>Obsolete laptops >>/g/tpg>Cheap electronics >>>/g/csg>Server questions >>>/g/hsg>Buying headphones >>>/g/hpg>How to find/activate any version of Windows?https://rentry.org/installwindowsPrevious: >>107789452
>>107826458Had a similar problem recently >>107819459.I plan to buy a big ass ferrite core to attach to the cable, but for now keeping it straight will do.
>>107831251>make it run on a modern EFI systemTake a gander at Arch or Gentoo or similar installation manual, they are all basically the same. Relevant part is the one where you take a kernel image, place it at the EFI system partition (named as linux.efi for example) and create an appropriate boot entry.Pro tip: use>root=PARTUUID=****for identifying the root filesystem. Assumed you aren't using encryption or LVM or RAID or anything of the sort, if you are you need the usual initramfs wizardy and idk about that stuff.
>>107831361Thanks for the tips. I already have experience with using the Ubuntu EFI stack and kernel on old distros (Bitdefender RescueCD, which is Gentoo-based). It's a matter of copying a few files across from the Ubuntu ISO.
>>107830127Try booting to a Linux distro installer and seeing if the generic drivers detect it from the live environment
>>107831141I'm pretty sure they have hybrid ones now that have rechargeable internal batteries; All you would need to do is connect with USB to charge when it gets low. I imagine they would last in the ball-park of 8-10 hours per charge, depending on the battery capacity, and if they force you to use rgb. Look for something that doesn't have lights, or allows you to toggle the lights on/off.>>107830900I have/had that router, it's a bit dated now, isn't it?Currently running a RT-AX86U Pro; Haven't had any issues with it whatsoever.>>107830522I disabled those features myself, didn't feel like jumping through hoops to fix it. Gemini could probably tell you how to do it pretty easily though.
/g/, where did (You) learn Assembly?
>>107818149Already had a grasp of it from youtube videosFirst hands-on "assembly" was the game Human Resource MachineThen when I eventually needed it IRL for a microcontroller, I just read the datasheet
>>107818149> me move> me add> me xorwhy computers are so retarded?
>>107831348it just werks
>>107831348You will never be a programmer.
>>107831348To me the weirdest thing is that there's no memory command. I would have expected something like an op to erase a whole range of memory like memset but as an op that would be taken care of by the memory controller, so it was weird to find out that everything in memory must be written word by word.
RAM will be reconfigured to improve the system, citizen.
>>107825539
>>107825709But how will I get all that RAM?
>>107825539what the fuck does 'reconfigure ram' mean
>>107830598buildzoid will personally come to your home and tweak your timings
>>107830598move RAM from one slot to anotherfrom one system to anotherfrom your lappy to "our" datacentersolidgoldmagikarp knew this
Why can't you find any good MP3 players today? I hate having to use my phone (which doesn't even have an audio jack) to listen to music.
>>107828651>Why can't youMe? Actually i'm moreso disappointed in the software.>>107828658(MP1 and MP2 exist)
I just use my old Creative Zen Mozaic. No better piece of hardware has been invented since.
I've never seen anyone IRL with an mp3 player that wasnt a doc martin wearing tranny
>>107828651>Why can't you find any good MP3 players today? I
>>107828651Because you are looking for an "mp3 player."Simple as.https://electronics.sony.com/audio/walkman-digital-recorders/audio-digital-voice-recorders/p/icdux570blk
Always turn this shit off on a newly installed system. It's annoying.
>>107830608A single autistic engineer noticed a minor performance anomaly during testing. Pure luck is the only thing that sabotaged a multiple year operation.
>>107830417every now and then you'll read a cve for a vuln that grants system access these are the exploits gov agencies put in the code as a backdoor until some hacker finds them and they get patched
>>107830563Ah, so I'm conflating code being readable with it being executable. I just assume this scenario would be a classic memory corruption where someone would somehow get malicious code into the heap and then it would execute said code.
>>107830968>then it would execute said code.isn't that what that previous anon said it does?code injection means it gets executed
>>107830029Arch does not come with SELinux. You might like Arch
THE CREATOR OF LINUX ADMITTED TO VIBE-CODING
>>107831372>the core C code remains hand-written
>>107831372>THE CREATORof this you are certain?
Luddites BTFO. I for one welcome our new AI overlords.
>>107831637you are biofuel to your AI overlords
>>107831414Half of the code in the repository is written in python. He thought the code was good enough to publish it under his own name.
