Be honest, is COSMIC ready for gaming?
>>107831927Once it ships on Debian 15
Hey what's the best way to deal with a scammer who took over someone's discord account? Long story short I had a really close friend on discord only (rookie mistake but I didn't want to push then for anything personal =3) And some scammers took over the account and are demanding 200 dollars . . . They first tried to scam me by pretending to be her to get me to give them money but it was obviously not the person so now their trying to scam me to maybe get info on contacting my friend :( It makes me really sad and I was wondering if any of you fine folk might know what to do . . . Im not sure what the proper way to figure this out is frens. . . >And I doubt they actually have the info; I feel like their just lying to try and scam more money as they tried a scam earlier Any nice hacker folks who hate scammers about and might know a trick or two that could be pulled =3This person was really a special person and I'd genuienly be a much sadder person if I never got to talk to them again.Like I reported them to discord and nothing happened so idk what to do frens . . . Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
If the account was stolen, contact Discord support. Seems like the logical thing to do.That being said, if you were such close friends, then this friend of yours can just make another account and contact you, no? Seems like a non-issue.
>>107830073That's the problem I've not found them again :( and i don't have another means of contacting them and idk if they would know my account to add it again. But thanks for your recommendations and I'll report it to discord support.
Bump plz
>>107831186meow_mix69
Bump
>Read the sticky: >>105076684>GNU/Linux questions >>>/g/fglt>Windows questions >>>/g/fwt>PC building? >>>/g/pcbg>Programming questions >>>/g/dpt>Obsolete laptops >>/g/tpg>Cheap electronics >>>/g/csg>Server questions >>>/g/hsg>Buying headphones >>>/g/hpg>How to find/activate any version of Windows?https://rentry.org/installwindowsPrevious: >>107789452
>>107831251>make it run on a modern EFI systemTake a gander at Arch or Gentoo or similar installation manual, they are all basically the same. Relevant part is the one where you take a kernel image, place it at the EFI system partition (named as linux.efi for example) and create an appropriate boot entry.Pro tip: use>root=PARTUUID=****for identifying the root filesystem. Assumed you aren't using encryption or LVM or RAID or anything of the sort, if you are you need the usual initramfs wizardy and idk about that stuff.
>>107831361Thanks for the tips. I already have experience with using the Ubuntu EFI stack and kernel on old distros (Bitdefender RescueCD, which is Gentoo-based). It's a matter of copying a few files across from the Ubuntu ISO.
>>107830127Try booting to a Linux distro installer and seeing if the generic drivers detect it from the live environment
>>107831141I'm pretty sure they have hybrid ones now that have rechargeable internal batteries; All you would need to do is connect with USB to charge when it gets low. I imagine they would last in the ball-park of 8-10 hours per charge, depending on the battery capacity, and if they force you to use rgb. Look for something that doesn't have lights, or allows you to toggle the lights on/off.>>107830900I have/had that router, it's a bit dated now, isn't it?Currently running a RT-AX86U Pro; Haven't had any issues with it whatsoever.>>107830522I disabled those features myself, didn't feel like jumping through hoops to fix it. Gemini could probably tell you how to do it pretty easily though.
>>107831141I have three wireless mice.Logitech M-RBY125 from 2008, uses two batteries and lasts about a year with low use.Logitech M705 (from 2014?) takes two batteries but uses one at a time. I recharge the batteries every 6 months, with heavy use.Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed (2020) takes one battery and consumes it within 4-5 weeks with moderate use (2-3 hours a day). It muches through 10+ alkaline batteries per year, which in my opinion is very excessive.Note that this data is with the mice never turned off manually, they are left to sleep on their own.
Hong Xiuquan Taiping Rebellion edition
>>107830428meant this for >>107830401 sorry
>>107825863basically lol i get ghosted by best buy with bachelors and 5 years exp
i miss roaring in the snow
>>107830283I don't think it's a good idea to get hopped up on caffeine to run a coffee shop. Don't get high off your own supply.
I'm racist.
Hytale uses QUIC for multiplayer. What do you think about it? Is this the first reasonably popular game that implements multiplayer over QUIC instead of using TCP or their own custom protocol on top of UDP?
>>>/v/>>>/lgbt/
>>107831502I think you're expecting too much from /g/. Nobody here has ever designed something as complex as an online games protocol and nobody here understands what using QUIC gives you over TCP and what you give up in exchange, especially in expensive server setups.At most, you'll get some schizo off his meds complaining that "THE TRANNIES!!!!!" are getting rid of TCP to further their goals of world domination or something.
>>107831502all quic data goes to google. you just played yourself.
>>107831790Sad but true.
Will this kill Windows and make Linux the most popular OS?
>>107831728This looks retarded and gay. Imagine being a KEK relying on WEB APPS
>>107830342Anti-Cheats won't magically work because Valve forked a Linux Distro, normies don't give a shit about their OS if it cannot run League or Valo.>>107830362>Battleeye and other bs anti cheats will partner with them and some games will only work on the limux-steamos-kernelThat's not how those things work, specially with people like EA, they keep spamming Steam discussions how Linux has more cheaters and when they disabled Linux support it was like they banned ~300k cheaters.>Why is proton a separate project and not upstream wine?Because Wine is shit, why would anyone partner with that?>Why is SteamOS still not available outside the deck?It is, literally go download it right now from steampowered, you can install it anywhere you want, fucktard.
>>107830342Why do people think an OS is just for vijeojames?Some people need to get their work done and some FOSS alternatives to production software are time wasting garbage. Windows won't die if this isn't tackled, because there's a good number of people that already would rather move away from the Apple ecosystem, and what's seen as a viable commercial alternative is Windows, no matter how shit it is as an operating system.
>>107831801Keep in mind the context here:You're already relying on Adobe apps in general...
>>107831728That looks like adobe acrobat. Not even on wangblows would people want this shit.
>YouTube has removed the ability to search by upload date.How come yt keeps getting shittier and shittier?
>>107822434Cool it with the anti-Indian remarks.
>>107830257>What does removing search do for line go up? Not much, but there's no tangible way that the backlash can outweigh the financial gain (yet), so they can penny pinch in all kinds of imperceptibly tiny ways that don't actually make THAT much money and it doesn't matter even if you scream about it all day. The only thing that could make a real impact to the company's conduct is its userbase fleeing to another video hosting service but unless TikTok expands to long-form horizontal video that ain't happening.
>>107822434Jewtube
>>107822434They remove that option every time there's a "happening"
>leddit found a work around and /g/browns haven'tim starting to think the reason this place is full of dumb people is because dumb people can post dumb shit without the dumbshit ever be tied back to them.
>We're gonna create a word prediction program so powerful it will start writing itself until it thinks.Why are AI bros so gullible?
The wall of debt thrown at LLMs is now a systemic risk. Even in the worst case scenario (and most likely case) where text based AI has peaked and world models are decades away, the US will NEED to backstop the debt through QE or half the banking system will go bust when all the AI grifters can't service their debt.Altman got the banking Jews into the grift, he won. If he goes down everyone goes down.
>>107830440>Luddite doesn't understand that this is printing moneyFor whom
>>107830440Whatever money this will or will not eventually generate, you will not see a single cent of. You retard accelerationists legitimately think you will somehow benefit from this, when in reality your shitty SaaS will either eventually be done in-house or you will be undercut by 50000 indians doing the same shit.I'm gonna be poor, but you are gonna be just as poor. Funny how you think duh luddites are delusional when you actively live in fucking fantasyland.
>>107831079I feel bad for you
>>107830440>all these ESLs thinking AI will make them millionairesIf that was true, most of you would still be poor, anyway.>>107830468This can't last forever, though. The market can't live on Jensen wearing a new jacket, forever. All it takes for this to end is for people to worry it's a bubble - whether or not it is one - and to try and get out first, then we're back to nvidia, Intel and AMD begging enthusiasts to buy enough of their stock to stop the collapse.
Why do laptop manufactures like HP go out of their way to sell "consumer grade" laptops with shoddy build quality when they can just rebrand old business laptops? I don't see why we can't have old inventories of Zbooks/Elitebooks/Probooks from a couple years ago sold at a discount or rebranded for consumer lines. Windows laptops already have an abysmal reputation for being cheap plastic with hinges made out of toothpicks, the least they can do is this.
you are very naive lol
>>107831589How so?
lurk moar:>>107761341As for normies, consoomers gotta consoom.
What do you think about this guy, /g/?
>>107831491entertaining and usefulwhat more do you need?
>>107831491yt shilled him to me and i hate him after 1 vid
>>107831491I don't like the bgm in his compilation vids, but those will be a good excuse for me to learn how to isolate and cancel certain sounds in an a/v file.
>>107831537>i hate him after 1 vidthat's a +7h video though.. time enough to grow some hate
>>107831491well, he seems light for an indian...
Steve is pissing and shitting his pants over AI again.For a supposed technology enthusiast he sure does love shitting on new technology.
>>107831400>being forced down our throat>Claude Code being used by all major tech companies>Linus vibe coding in Antigravity>Outstanding math problems starting to be solved by ChatGPT>AI solving biology in real time with drugs being simulated in vivo in every cell typebut no tell us how it's being forced down your throat and you're not just being left behind in the dustbin of history with nazis, confederates, white people and other eternal losers
>>107831380You don't have to fall for the AGI or singularity meme to know that neural networks have already proven they have real utility in problem solving and they're only getting better in every domain they've been tried in. Coding agents went from meme tier to being essential in the span of 1 year they're not going anywhere.
>>107831409You're really trying to dial that gaslighting up to 11. Too bad those words you're using have lost all meaning.
/g/ was always all about the bleeding edge of technology and nowadays that is AI. /g/ fastmen are all vibe-coding lightning fast solutions now and if you don't like it you can always click X and go to reddit
>>107822380He complaints about the fact that AI technology created a speculative bubble that is making consumer hardware unreasonably expensive.But retarded apes shilling for (being paid by) these companies like you will never understand that.Fuck you
Why is /g/ so one-shotted by the 100% fallacy that they can't see the usefulness of AI?Because it's not 100% perfect, AI is completely useless.Are you all just so terrified of AI taking your jobs that you're stuck in a state of delusion, wishful thinking, and desperation?
>>107826356If you ignore all the ai threads on /g/, sure...
>>107826356>Why is /g/ so one-shotted by the 100% fallacy that they can't see the usefulness of AI?Because for 99% of the supposed usecases it's worthless.
>>107826509Threadly reminder that consoomer-grade """AI""" provides negative value to society by every objective metric. It's only a competition for spiteful mutants like you whose job it is to shit everything up for real people.
>>107826444Lmao, this is your argumentation logic after you fried your brain chatting to Loli ai all night.Should've asked chatgpt to reply for you
>>107831821>Should've asked chatgpt to reply for youI bet he did.
it's over
>>107829680So that's why it runs like shit...
invite indians on hb1starts to poop all over code>label poop a featuresaaar redeem da cooode
>>107829696cool rare pepe
>>107829696Not exactly. The standard provided an interface and some guarantees, but not an implementation in the standard library. Nobody really did anything with it.
engagement bait slop
Apple says Face ID is more secure than Touch ID but is that even true?Sure, Face ID is statistically less likely to return a false positive with random faces because faces are more diverse than fingerprints are but fingerprints are more randomly distributed, so the odds that you know someone who shares enough facial features with you (say, biological family members, for instance) to trigger a false positive have to be higher than someone you know having a similar enough fingerprint. Even though faces can potentially be more different between individuals, fingerprints are less often shared between people the user and people who regularly appear in his life, who are the most likely people to attempt to unlock his devices without his permission. Additionally, if you're holding someone else's phone in their presence, I'd imagine it's harder to unlock their phone against their will by taking them by surprise with Touch ID than it would be with Face ID. With Face ID, all the user has to do is glance at the device for even a split second. With Touch ID, you need to place your finger -- the right finger -- on the sensor and press. It's a more involved and intentional process, but also a more convenient one because you don't have to uncover your face or position yourself correctly or make eye contact with the device in order to initiate the unlock sequence. Shouldn't it also be harder to fabricate a counterfeit fingerprint than it would be to create a mask realistic enough to unlock the device?Basically, Touch ID seems just better than Face ID across the board. The only practical upside to Face ID I can think of is the ability to read notification details without touching the device. Is there something I'm not considering here or are fingerprint sensors just better than facial recognition?
>>107830213>criminalsThe police can just hold your phone to your face to unlock it and the courts have allowed it.
>>107830640that was google photos, which uses a different type of facial recognition. you'd have to get real close to an actual gorilla to even try it with face id
>>107830658>>107830625Anon I think you're conflating Face Unlock (Android; uses RGB "selfie" cam) with Face ID (uses TrueDepth, separate from the selfie camera).Taking a photo or video of the device's owner only works with Face Unlock because Face Unlock is purely software and just scans the camera feed for what looks like a face before comparing that face to the one on file. Face ID looks for shape, not color. It uses lasers to create a depth map of whatever objects are in front of it and compare that shape to the one on file. If you hold up a photo of the registered face, the TrueDepth camera won't see the photo. It'll just see the shape of whatever object is supposed to be displaying it. So, a hand holding a rectangle. And since neither of those shapes resemble a human head, it wouldn't trigger a false positive. This is also why Face ID works in pitch black darkness and Face Unlock does not, and why Face ID doesn't care about things like makeup or lighting.
>>107830292>cop grabs your phone>puts it up in front of your face>phone is unlockedMy phone only opens with a pin
>>107830777>be a BTFO Andjeet Retard>UHHHHH SUCKING COCKSvery telling
THE CREATOR OF LINUX ADMITTED TO VIBE-CODING
>>107831372>the core C code remains hand-written
>>107831372>THE CREATORof this you are certain?
Luddites BTFO. I for one welcome our new AI overlords.
>>107831637you are biofuel to your AI overlords
>>107831414Half of the code in the repository is written in python. He thought the code was good enough to publish it under his own name.
