This board is dedicated to the discussion of history and the other humanities such as philosophy, religion, law, classical artwork, archeology, anthropology, ancient languages, etc. Please use /lit/ for discussions of literature. Threads should be about specific topics, and the creation of "general" threads is discouraged.For the purpose of determining what is history, please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago. Historical discussions should be focused on past events, and not their contemporary consequences. Discussion of modern politics, current events, popular culture, or other non-historical topics should be posted elsewhere. General discussions about international culture should go on /int/./his/ is not /pol/, and Global Rule #3 is in effect. Do not try to treat this board as /pol/ with dates. Blatant racism and trolling will not be tolerated, and a high level of discourse is expected. History can be examined from many different conflicting viewpoints; please treat other posters with respect and address the content of their post instead of attacking their character. When discussing history, please reference credible source material, and provide as much supporting information as possible in your posts.
Enemy of Rome
There's any flaws in Buddhism? What some of biggest criticism to Buddhism?
>>17440020>since there is never any source permitting them to enter into existence to begin withThe idea that something cannot come from nothing is a materialist belief.With true nothing, there are no rules including no rules that something cannot come from nothing.
>>17439923As an "-ism", the criticism are many cultural and historical rituals/dogmas. As a religious-philosophical doctrine itself, there's not many that I can think of. The "antinatalism" argument is just a pro-hedonism argument. Which is an invalid criticism unless you consider hedonic lifestyle to be "good" or somehow more correct. But generally, the biggest "criticism" is public/people are shallow. Extremely shallow so they wont understand Buddhism. 99% of criticism is just shallow misunderstanding of basic tenants by both non-Buddhists and casual buddhists.
>>17440660Buddhist "medieval" philosophy was that conceptual formations corresponds with what we know as "reality." That is the reality of seemingly permanence/solidity/separateness/uniqueness/differences. This grasping of this "permanence" is seen as an error. In particularly, Buddhists argue its not the language that is creating problems, but the primal conceptualization, the primal grasping/permanence function, the primal comparative function in the brain after the grasping, that which distorts our reality. Idea of language = reality was never a Buddhist thing, they bypassed that entirely down to cognitive functions to the base level. I mean phenomenology in the west is chasing that aren't they? They're just skipping the language and just going for the function of experience itself, rather than the experiences.
>>17439923As far as I or anyone can tell it’s incoherent. They will speak to its usefulness like a flawed system of physics that is close enough but the reality is Buddhism is flawed in its understanding of nirvana and therefore the entirety of existence
>>17439923>There's any flaws in Buddhism?correctly understood, no.>What some of biggest criticism to Buddhism?that there are a lot of buddhisms, and now people do not know what is wrong and what is right.
Better a Wolf of Odin than a lamb of "god".
>>17441055but what about his name?
>>17441063*Tiwaz does not descend from *Dyeus, it descends from *Dyew- (which *Dyeus also descends from). As a blunt example: The modern English descendant of *Dyew- would be pronounced "taw", and the modern English descendant of *Dyeus Pther would probably be something like "tawfther" (A contraction of "taw" and "Father" found in other descendants of this term, like "Jupiter", which is a contraction of "deus" and "pater"; palatization was lost during the contraction). Instead, we call the God in question "Tiw", as in "Tuesday". Essentially Tyr's name means "the shining one", as the *Dyew- root means "shining".
>>17437818>The wolves in question
>>17441091>Thor is not your blonde blue-eyed aryanhe is probably blue-eyed and definitely an aryan, but he was a redhead, not blonde. Though of course, having said that, red hair is still mostly associated with white people>Half the gods were immigrants>alleged "asatruar" promotes blasphemous christian "out of asia" euhemerization theoryliteral fake pagan>norse paganism empowers womenthe only female viking in norse mythology is depicted as a psycho bitch until some chad puts a baby in her and turns her into a happy stay-at-home mom>There are queer godsonly Loki is queer, and he's not a god>warriors do not equal bullies>Harbarthsljoth stanza 22>[Odin] said:>"A tree has only the space>it can crowd another out of;Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>17439671You cleary have a double digit iq
Please give a serious answer; why did Hitler hate jews?
>>17441062>why aren't goyim framing their struggle through the master race ideology we made up out of thin air?Because we actually have access to real National Socialist ideological material and it clearly characterizes National Socialism as a national liberation ideology against a clique of psychotic genocidal capitalist oligarchs
>>17441081>Because we actually have access to real National Socialist ideological material and it clearly characterizes National Socialism as a national liberation ideology against a clique of psychotic genocidal capitalist oligarchsThen why are its biggest exponents always Chud Anon and other such brown people? I'd estimate that the # of brown Naziboos outnumbers white ones 8-1.
>>17441042The same criticism of jews exists outside context of their own incriminating fables lol. In all likelihood they were the Hyksos usurpers that were kicked out, it's the exact same m.o.>we wuzzingLow iq confirmed>>17441062>how little self-awarenesskek
>>17441068Jews aren't very smart at all. They're only somewhat competent at text-heavy fields like law and of course the entertainment business (where they can be good at writing a song or a movie script) and they have poor problem-solving skills and crystalline intelligence. Also they're physically clumsy and very un-athletic plus prone to lots of genetic diseases. You can take advantage by overcharging them for repair services and other such items because they're not smart enough to change a flat tire or replace a light bulb.
>>17441089>you are brown or somethingTotal Non-sequitur
How would history change if melanism occurred in humans?
>>17441096We'd all still be cavemen.
What were Hitler's plans for Africa?
>>17440170Hitler was a longhouse cuck who was delusional about female nature so German women would probably be allowed to go on bbc vacations there.
>>17440170Look at how they churned out the propaganda back then, same as now. He didn’t actually demand any of germany’s former colonies back.
>>17440611NTA, but he’s right and you’re wrong. European colonies in Africa did not collapse due to WWII. That game would have collapsed anyway even without a second war. WWI led to bankruptcy in Britain and France, along with national awakenings and anti-colonialism on the part of the Africans. America, who entirely funded Britain and France at this point via their debts, demanded that Europe relinquish its colonies. This wasn’t sustainable.
>>17440623>>17440616Nobody is interested in arguing with your pan-africa garbage.
>>17440962Hitler stripped women of virtually all their rights, fucking retard. That was one of the main criticisms levied at him by the West as a dictator. Have you read at least one book in your entire stupid life?
Let us post and talk about interesting historical women.
>>17440954Need me a hoe like Olga
>>17441074There are also female druids>>17441072Cuckeltics
>>17441088>There are also female druidsThe few books I've read on the Celts did not mention any.
>>17441072This
>>17441097Is this what passes as history to /his/torylets? Wojaks and memes made in MS paint?
>his ancestry was compatible with sephardic hurritage! well publish the paper soon!>Oh that paper? Were just never gonna release it jajajajajajaWill we ever get to see his actual dna results?
In this household Christopher Columbus is a hero!
pending*
Who was worse? The Gestapo or The Stasi?
>>17439419Yup its exactly the same shit. Cope with it.
>>17440506People generally respect their "own" spies who pull off impressive feats *abroad*.
>>17437770He should've kept fucking the general's daughter.
>>17437165>Russian Kompromat Chancellor, a full blown Nazi militia cell, and 10 Islamist terrorist attacks a day right now.Very based, imagine all the "happenings" occurring instead of a boring, slowing collapsing neoliberal German elite.
>>17435386>Americanid creature claps it's pawsThere's a reason east is the region of Germany still with any semblance of tradition, pride, and dignity. The west is a soulless hellhole with the highest rate of furries in the world and cheerleading the arrival of 10 million Africans.
Do historians make better politicians?
Truman was a good student of history and was very good as a political operative; JFK was and was good at the politics but not governing.
>>17440131Yes. >>17440146>JFK>good at politicsMore like good at throwing daddy's money around
>>17440259You can throw money around and still never connect with voters; JFK clearly did. I wonder why you're trying to deny his skills as a politician other than some foolish partisan grudge.
>>17441050A modern example is Trump
There is no way the jungle folks built cities like this.
>>17439803>Get BTFO globally in the last 500 years by snowniggers that never even invented agricultureImagine having a prehistorically ancient head start and still getting wrecked. Only non-whites I can respect are Turkics.
>>17439829Weird how these supposed effects of colonialism and systematic persecution never held ypipo back then.
>>17439844Learning that most touristic historical buildings are modern restorations really did a number on some of you niggers, you're speaking nonsense now.The mexican government did not build the shitty flat stone foundations in the middle of downtown Mexico City that are all that remains of Tenochtitlan because why the fuck would they? They don't even get tourists, archaeologists are the ones who use them most of the time.They didn't "build" the restored non-aztec pyramids elsewhere in the country either, at least not in the way you seem to think they did, the fact that they were overgrown with vegetation a century ago doesn't mean that they were akshually earthen mounds that the mexican government (and the spanish empire before them) have for whatever reason continuously fooled the world into thinking were actually stone pyramids for the past 500 years, it doesn't make any sense if you actually know anything about the topic, or are not retarded.
>>17439472Good thing that the Aztec weren't in the Jungle and the Valley of Mexico and otherparts of Central Mexico were temperate valleys thenTenochtitlan did look pretty close to that, I already explicitly listed the specific caveats and potential inaccuracies (some/most of the commoner homes may have had stray instead of flat roofs or wouldn't have been painted, the exact layout of the precinct would be slightly different and the layout of the other portions of the city is somewhat speculative, the bottom right Jean Torton/Voyages D'Alix art uses some art from the Mixtec Zouch Nuttal Codex rather then Aztec artwork, though as seen in pic related, Mixtec stuff would still look quite similar to Aztec ones, etc) in the bottom of the image for the sake of intellectual honestyI also uploaded or provided links to 20+ images of surviving ruins, manuscript depictions, etc which back up the architectural style being shown in those pieces of art being accurate, as well as mention Spanish and Aztec descriptions of the city and it's architecture to back up the reconstructions here:arch.b4k.co/v/thread/640239519/#640246635arch.b4k.co/v/thread/640239519/#640247043arch.b4k.co/v/thread/640239519/#640247735arch.b4k.co/v/thread/640239519/#640250836>>17439844It's true that a fair amount of restorations done on Mesoamerican ruins in the early 20th century are overly extrapolative and had errors, but none of that is really the case with Tenochtitlan's remains, which were mostly excavated in the middle and later 20th century and have had minimal restoration work done.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>17439482>>17439472Both Mexico City and Cairo are desert enviornments, not jungles
If God isn't real, why do you go on living? What are you living for? >I just doWhat are you, an animal? You must be if you're satisfied with that answer. Come on, face reality. Answer me. What the fuck are you putting your faith in?
>>17438868This image unintentionally goes hard.
>>17438782>People lie sometimes therefore it's fine for me to spout bullshitWhat a disgusting person.
>>17438787I like how you know that you're lying, which is why you're just coping about how I won't believe any evidence. Don't you guys brag all the time about how atheist scientists get converted by looking into miracles? I guess that was just another lie.
>>17438954Sperg bros, I kneel.
Atheist answers to this topic always sound so wishy washy and vague, as if they try not to ever think too hard about it.
If Jesus was literally God why did he need spell components?
>>17440986
>>17440986Because He is also human.
The teachings of Yahweh are perfect. They renew the soul. The testimony of Yahweh is dependable. It makes gullible people wise.The instructions of Yahweh are correct. They make the heart rejoice. The command of Yahweh is radiant. It makes the eyes shine.The fear of Yahweh is pure. It endures forever. The decisions of Yahweh are true. They are completely fair.They are more desirable than gold, even the finest gold. They are sweeter than honey, even the drippings from a honeycomb.As your servant I am warned by them.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>17441051Shalom
>>17441051>>17440990Why did he need spell components though?
Summarized by the amalgamation of EE and WE.
Amerindian admixture is Nordic. Mestizos are Aryan af.
>>17440139
>>17440270It is. There is not a single P* outside of one west Eurasian Siberian. There is also a single K* and it’s in a West Eurasian Siberian as well.>according to family treeLook at the coverage. It’s not P, it’s R2.Kostenki’s C1 is also found in SundAbos.You are in denial because the implication is that White people (who look like me) have been having sex with people who looked like you for a very long time.>>17440275These aren’t even basal, the oldest non-basal clades are still in Siberians like Nivkhs.
>>17440205>>17440241Now the anti-Nordic bronwnoid is pro nigger zoomali. A borrealized Finn is still more human than any horn nigger.
