Christmas EditionAnon's guide for beginners, text and figures!https://rentry.org/sa6c4mVicious' TL;DR V3.1 with annotations by A2Grip:https://files.catbox.moe/91lvkc.jpgSoundtrack:https://youtu.be/8SpY1K2ngLo?t=39Previous>>64666830
>>64680982Post pics of it with your assault rifle one five
restless rifle syndrome has me wanting to put the atacr on the 11.5 then building out my mk18 again, even though i know thats a dumb idea.
>>64681251>put the atacr on the 11.5Mini recce, hell yeah. MK18s are back for 2026 btw
>>64681251ok
>>64679902>Are you retardedNta but I bricked my gaming laptop by fucking around with linux recently. I need to reinstall windows at some point but I just don't care to do so.
so let me get this straight: it has the profile of a ww1 tank, is slow as an interwar tank, has the armor of a ww2 tank, has the gun of a modern tank BUT with worse range, penetration, and precision, doesn't have CMs, doesn't have ERA, doesn't have an autoloader, doesn't have GPS, doesn't have telemeters or aiming softwares of any kind, it barely has an electric motor to turn the turret, it barely has a radio, and you're telling me THIS is a futuristic design?
It's not supposed to be futuristic, the principle of Warhammer is that most futuristic technologies developed in the past have been lost or are in the process of being lost so it's quite logical to have tanks equivalent to WWII when genuinely futuristic weapons exist in this universebut yes otherwise the rest of the lore is stupid
>>64680709There's less ass rape in 40k tho
>>64680886Maybe they dream of less rape? Or a place with less rape they can go rape?
>>64680946There's no HIV in 40k, they dream of ass rape without consequences.
>>64665288>retrofuturism is something that looks outdated but it performs betterFutureretroism.
No politics, no industrial feasibility or cancellation talk allowed.What is the logical military use case for a huge expensive "battleship" with 3x more displacement than a Ticonderoga and only a few more VLS cells? What advantage could it hold over Flight III Burkes, DDG(X), VPM SSNs, or an SSGN Columbia variant?>1. The core use case would be a large fast cruiser able to escort carriers at prolonged high speeds around the Pacific, in situations where conventional escorts and their oilers couldn't keep up, or would slow the carrier down with UNREP making for risky ASBM attack windows.This is reliant on it being nuclear powered, which isn't confirmed and makes it more expensive and industrially intensive. Perhaps the Navy has done the math and found that cruising around at an unbroken 35 knots is useful to increase the PLA's sea search volume or complicate ASBM kill chains. But it doesn't have that many VLS cells so it must rely on novel weapons as an escort to avoid magazine depletion. >continued
>>64680780I'll just get a job as KzL guardunlike you, I can show up on time and do what I'm told so I expect I will hold the job for a long timecheckmate, atheist
>>64680740Read the Dealer Sticker. Trumpy is advertised with a 6 inch belt. Marginally less than the deck armor on the Roma. If the glide bombs hit the Roma belt, that was 14 inches.
>>64680802they hit the deck, which was 6 inches tapering to 2 in some places (such as the area where the first FritzX fell - the deck armor was not thick enough to arm it so it only exploded when it hit the water after passing through the entire ship)
>>64680601Hey now, that sounds suspiciously like LCS talk. Everyone knows you need to have ships capable of preforming every mission themselves and being able to tank multiple hits.
>>64680767>by the power of memes I've decided I won the argument Postnatally abort yourself
kek
>>64678291>IranianSit down faggot.https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drohne-Anti-Radar
>>64678922>what on earth did they need an RQ-170 for when making a shahed?Shahed is a product line, HESA makes dozens of different drones. The RQ-170 clone is Shahed 171 "Simorgh", while the flying dorito we all know and love is Shahed 136.
>>64680250>M4 is cheaper to make than an AK of comparable qualityLmao
>>64681273He's right though
>>64681273In the USA it is.
how fucked are silencer wait times going to be next week?
>>64680408>constructive intentYeah, that's why I'm submitting a Form 1. Do you have any examples of this actually happening?
>>64680322>posts on k>about being worried about the feds10/10 I guffawed.
>>64681253>it's not a silencerGood enough for Hiram Maxim, good enough for me. Would you prefer "muffler"?
>>64681272>Would you prefer "muffler"?Only around my neck.>soft pitch>let's see if he swings
I just moved to a red state, how do I go by buying a suppressor from a website, do they give me the option to fill out the forms or do I need to do that myself
PX4 edition Guide: https://files.catbox.moe/9g5sv2.pdfPastebin: https://pastebin.com/gs6mLNikPrevious: >>64664781
>>64680409i like ur style, magic man
>>64678438
Is it worth it ?
>>64681276https://www.sharrisuniforms.com/mr11-adapter-mount/11938/pThat's for a 1911. I'm looking for one for a 92. Tempted to grab this but I'm not sure in committed to putting it on my 92 or if I should just invest in a bigger, more modern handgun
>>64679971There's a cure to HIV. So basically you have to never have been gay...>>64680397Gay sportslop. Honestly anyone with a toddler tier sports mindset shouldn't be allowed to own guns. If any anons here are addicted to sportsball they should make it their 2026 resolution to break their addiction. Don't get me started on sports betting.>>64681276If you've got a really autistic repro build you're doing, not really. Otherwise, fuck no.
Have Russia fixed theirs AK12 or its still sucks? Do Russians soldiers still prefers the oldies AK74Ms?
>>64680347>Have Russia fixed theirs AK12Yes, by changing it towards the original proto rejected by boomer generals in the peacetime. >Do Russians soldiers still prefers the oldies AK74MsSome do, if only out of sense of familiarity and\or having a bag of Zenitco stuff to deck in out in. Aftermarket for the 12 is still a bit sparse, esp. with the changes to the grip\FCS and muzzle device in recent revisions.Also, we now have a heavy(-ish) barrel assault shorty for some sweaty balls-to-crack CQB.
>>64680434Would you say that the current version of AK12 is meanginful superior to AK74M or is just slight more light? Do Russians soldiers would prefer to use captured western rifles like HK416, UAR 15 etc if they had access to its ammo?
>>64680347Its okay. Now that they reverted the burst to a regular 74 trigger, the reliability issues have mostly evaporated; and the newer magpul style furniture is much tougher than the original buffer tube shit. 74s are preferred because of the aftermarket and don't have the quality stigma of the ak12, but with the native ability to mount optics and lights, the actual necessity of the aftermarket is way diminished; which could be said to be the whole point of the gun. The mags are excellent, seriously sought after even by guys who otherwise hate the gun. There will always be those who refuse to accept it, simply because the 74 didn't have these teething problems (at least nobody is old enough to remember), but on the whole its a decent if unambitious upgrade.>>64680469generally no, but depend on who they are. a lot of times guys capture a gun with a thermal, and they have no means to use it on their own gun; so it makes sense to just keep using the gun it came on while ammo lasts. it also cant be discounted that its a whole generation of gamers, who think M4s and 416s are cool and just appreciate them as a trophy.
>>64680347does the top cover hold zero now or not yet
Do wooden logs work as armor or is it cope?
>>64679731Is spalling even a thing anymore? I mean with chobham like armor.
>>64678039This sort of stuff doesn't work on FPV drones since they have different fuze designs.
>Pakistan Wants India To Enter Into War With Bangladesh: India's Chief of Defence Staffhttps://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/pakistan-bangladesh-defence-deal-nuclear-what-it-means-for-india-2840610-2025-12-23
>>64681020This board is dying anyway.
>>64681020/k/ becoming pro India is as unlikely as an Idian/Pakistan alliance. Jesus fuck, faggots, these two were just in the biggest air war since Gulf I.
>>64681020Or>laugh at destroyed/failed chinesium equipments and laugh at dead jeets
>>64680725Is the png from indian special forces?
>>64681020fuck off astroturf fag no sane person will support indiayou terminally online morons live in a false dichotomy you can support the mutual destrction of both shitholes same with israel vs palestine
Any hunters on /k/?I've got some serious hunting related questions as of recently.>cop in a european city>hardly have to deal with LIVE wild animals because they're usually just roadkill as part of traffic accident protocolling>until 3 weeks ago when some asshat ran over and crushed a deer's hind legs, then left it crippled and suffering on the road>traffic already backing up because of it>get dispatched to kill/move the wounded animal>sure thing, chief>it was a disaster, still feel bad weeks laterWe're not trained in delivering finishing shots to wounded animals and it's usually not necessary because there are enough hunters in the surrounding counties at any time - until there aren't. Buddy wanted to use her service pistol, I argued for the AR because my logic was "bigger caliber = instant kill, no suffering".Neither of us are hunters and therefore opted for a headshot, which was a bad idea because apparently a deer's brain is really small and the brain stem even moreso.We know hunters usually just aim for the heart, but we looked at the deer and it was just smooth fur everwhere with no real indication where the heart was. It was an adult animal so the heart must've been bigger but unlike with a human torso, it was just a mass of fur. No fucking idea where to safely aim for the heart here?First shot to where the brain SUPPOSEDLY was (Google...) left if violently threshing for 10 seconds before settling down, then it started those rasping breaths and turned it's bleeding head looking at us which was fucked up and honestly pretty sad. We opted to try once more, she aimed for where the brain was and again, spazzing around and more breathing.
>>64677538>that picrelSeriously, how can anyone look at those animals and think to shoot them? It is a cruel joke of nature that some of the cutest animals are also the most delicious, and the most amenable to husbandry. You guys ever seen a highland calf? Your heart will melt.
>>64681190>cutest animals are also the most delicious,Tell me you don't eat squid without saying you don't eat squid.
>>64681190>the most amenable to husbandry>the most inbred, y-chromosome bottlenecked species for over 2000yrsThere you go. Does it look at all like an aurock? More like a chihuahua vs wolf.
>>64681218No I do not. I dislike most seafood. Like most people, the bulk of the meat in my diet is made up of mammals, hence the cuteness problem..>>64681228I mean bovids in general, lol.
>>64681249>cuteness problemAs a cowboy in Colorado, I have worked cattle and like anyone who has, have a huge disrespect for the dumbest animals on the planet. I respect vegetarians (human) more than cattle, pehaps oddly.
Merry Christmas you beautiful anons!If you haven't received your package, please submit an email to me and we will start tallying the late arrivals, and then sorting between folks who are likely to get theirs in the next few days vs those who the dreaded USPS has lost forever. We will be dispatching the Grinch Relief Corps (GRC) as needed to remedy. Send grinch relief applications to wendigohunter at protonmail dot comthread theme: https://youtu.be/HPdHkHslFIU?si=--taGzS1BwZ1KnRTold thread>>64643227
>>64678512I’ll be posting later when I have time today. I’ve had a rather busy Christmas day. Glad to see all the presents and joy. >>64678955>>64679379>SkylineOh my! Fellow Ohio Anon, are you around Cincy by chance?
>>64680215Awesome! Im glad you like everything. I hope you participate next year
Uncle Phil, thank you for all the stuff!
I appreciate it! Can't wait to cook on my little skillet.
>my target still hasn't posted I hope they're doing well!
Listen Here You Little Shit EditionPost wood (furniture)Big RiflesBig BulletsFroppy Frens InsideThread theme ~https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HUtwku8R9Q&list=RD1HUtwku8R9Q&start_radio=1As always; No Jannies, No TranniesPreviously, on X-men: >>64608347
>>64681089>I feel ripped off, I demand my money back.You should get back every penny paid, I am fully behind you.>christian 4chan pass users violated again
>>64680375IL, FALs and G3 variants are banned by name here.
>>64681168>banned by name hereCall it something else.
Can we make a FAL FRT conversion a focus in here?
$1100 24" .300win mag in Midnight Bronze, still an awesome gun!https://www.bearcreekarsenal.com/huntmaster-300-win-mag-24-parkerized-lw-barrel-1-10-twist-rifle-length-15-mlok-sch-rifle.html
Where can I buy replicas of bronze age armor /k/?: https://youtu.be/aM-TuFkUXEA?
>>64679592to be fair, every movie should plagiarize Paprika
shit, maybe AI is alright if we can fix this movie
>>64677382You know shits bad when fucking family guy manages to be more accurate and have more SOVL
>>64679675Are you a leaf?
>>64677027>bronze age cavalryannoys me every time its depicted in modern mediaespecially a heavy lancer like this
Speech: http://kcna.kp/en/article/q/5ceed4f1eb2058145a9bbbc60fcf07dd.kcmsftl;rd: Basically they want a nuclear sub fleet and are building a Blue Water navy, new surface ships explicitly referred to as 'Attack Destroyers'1/4: It is large.
>>64680058Its a common misconception that you can just scale up a naval design. You can extend hull length. Once you mess with beam, you run into issues. Past a small margin calculations for stress etc go out the window, more so with a pressure hull. You end up having to design a new boat.
>>64680803Like I said, I do not know what the Norks did. The shape of the hull looks very much like a Lada class or Amur class, both of which could theoretically fit a reactor of this>>64680066type in a somewhat stretched hull section, and Russia does have them in relatviely large numbers.It'd take people with more experience and skill to analyze these pics in a way that tells us the actual hull dimensions.H.I. Sutton might be working on it, but it's only been a few days.Also, are those things on teh side just ballast keels to counterbalance the missile hump?
>>64676713This but Pakistan
>>64676729>Fuck you, anon, I will be fantasizing about this for weeks now.I understood you were in pain about halfway through your post.
>>64676744>The real threat is the artillery that will flatten Seoul before the US can counter-battery fire.Is it nuclear artillery? If not it'll only do limited damage before getting counter-spammed.
Which caliber is better? Does the shorter length of the .308 while being mostly the same ballisticly make it better, or does the slightly longer length and ability to use heavier grain bullets of the 30-06 make it better?Or is 30-06 better because it sounds cooler and is an American classic?
>>64677636fish gun!
>>64666510The deer I ahor with 140gr 6.5 creed took one step before he flopped over and by the time I had walked up to him (75yds) he had slipped onto the afterlife. 6.5creedmore is plenty for a deer. I find it to be an excellent intermediate between 243 and 308
>>64678868>using outdated and hard to convert units of measure just to spite the Euros
>>64664630First of all, the caliber is exactly the same .308; it is the cartridge that's different.That said, .308 is cheaper and gives very close to the same performance as .30-06 in their respective factory loads. So for the vast majority of shooters .308 is the superior choice.However, .30-06 has a greater case capacity and therefore greater flexibility for hand loads and boutique rounds. So for those shooters that hand load or are chasing niche performance; .30-06 is the superior choice.If you are a military or police force, the savings in weight and material in both the cartridge and the gun that shoots it makes .308 the vastly superior choice.tl;dr : depends on who you are and what you're doing with the round. Mostly .308, but sometimes .30-06.
>>64664630>Which caliber is better?The caliber is the same. :^)Anyway strictly speaking .30-06 will always be superior in theory because the case volume allows it to mog .308.In practice 99% of the time with OTC ammo they're functionally identical.I like .30-08 better for purely aesthetic reasons, the round just looks cooler, .308 is kinda squat in comparison.
