photos of my cat Rupert that i took on my phone which at least trace amounts of thoughtful composition, as per the board rules I like this shot because it really focuses on his face, which is cute
>>4480847>>4480848>>4480849What a photogenic fella
Safe travels, Rupert.
All of these photos would be 600x better if you had dogs. Cats are kinda reddit these days ngl
>>4488893Make a thread with dogs, then.Here's one of mine from RPT.
>>4476319You caught a nice moment here. I think it would be better if you brought up the crop to a little bit below where his feet would be, behind the blanket, and maybe bring it in just a tiny bit on the right so there's a little more focus on the empty space he is looking towards.
It is time.
iPhone’s silvertone just slaps 99% of the time.
>>4488914just shoot m43 - it's like phone
New color film!!!lucky 200 has finally dropped.Anybody shot it yet? waiting for my order to arrive.
>>4488583yeah its alright, shot a roll so far
to think lomography sold literal garbage rolls (some even marked with letters and codes on top of the image) for $20, and still do
Damn I expected chinaslop to cost less than Kodak Gold
>>4488601>>4488638>>4488641its cheaper if you are from a third hole shithole, a roll of Gold cost 15 usd for me. And Lucky its just 9 USD so yeah.
>>4488583I've shot with the BW 400. I just finished my roll of Lucky 200, but I haven't developed it yet.
I'm gonna attend a wedding on saturday and i want to shoot some film. It's an african wedding, so there will be loads of bright colors and warm hues. I shoot with a Point and shoot camera (pentax iqzoom), but i own a SLR (Nikon fg 20). I have never shot with an slr camera, and i have no clue how they work. But i reckon the pictures look better on an slr. I have two dilemmas at hand>I don't know which film stock is good for capturing warm hues >I don't know if i should try out the slr camera (or if i should play it safe)i want to capture something reminiscent of picrel
>>4488855Try to get some Ultramax/Fuji 400. 100-200 ISO Films are generally not fast enough indoors
>>4488924>I think it will be pretty well lit inside,NTA. Don't be fooled. Even pretty heavy indoor lighting is nowhere near the LV of the outdoors.Indoors with film I'm normally pushing HP5 to 800 at minimum and realistically to 1600 (but I think it looks kind shit pushed two stops). At 800 ISO I'm only just in a "safe" shutter speed range to avoid camera shake and I need to ask people to stay still for photos indoors.400 ISO film is absolute minimum for indoors and I'd be pushing that one stop anyway. If you're using colour film then fagghedaboudit
>>4488946Portra and Lomo 800 work fine indoors, if a bit grainy. But pushing hp5 will make the grain apparent too.
>>4488846get old gold 100 (2006-2005)
>>4488846it is possible to mount 28mm (if you have one) to fg-20 set aperture to 5.6 and 3.3m focus and shoot day with kodak 100 proimage
Should i get a Sony zv-e 10 II new or a Lumix S II.My goal is 4k 30fps with the highest dynamic range possible, 10bit log and fast sensor readout speed (low jellow)
>>44888127artisan is a goated cine lens (both photo and video versions as I'm pretty sure they're the same lens)Get a bog standard 24-70 and a cine prime and you'll be set for life.
>>4488878Are these actually able to cover full frame? Because most cine lenses I see on alichingchong only cover a crop sensor.That 35mm looks genuinely deadly.
You might want to crop just a tadhttps://youtu.be/T-zs6qbOW6IDude here cropped to x1.1 and it's perfectly finehttps://youtu.be/9Z0vKKT-6k8
>>4481441>highest dynamic range possiblealexa 35 brobut seriously, learn how to light the scene, and any camera will do just fine
>>4488927Wow it even has an emergency butt plug
I shoot black and whit 'art' photos.I print a lot. So i spend a lot of time looking at the details of each photo. especially if they're hanging on my wall.that being said, i have a conundrum which, surprisingly, isn't well covered on the internet:>would you say a leica monochrom, or a medium format (with more bits and more sensor real estate) would produce better black and white images?
>>4487912Did you forget to attach your photo again?
>>4487913Yep, silly me. I totally forgot. Somday I'll stop being such fucking scum. Alas, today is not that day.
>>4487910I like my nikon zr with its huge ass screen
>>4487915Dope choice, I'd love to get one>>4487914Still sad
>>4482924The Monochrom is cool and I'd like to try it sometime. But it's just way too expensive to justify. You can buy a Pentacon Six with a Carl Zeiss lens for $200 and 200 rolls of bw film including development and scanning ($20/roll) for the same price as the Leica without no lens. Double that if you develop yourself, which is half the fun with bw anyway.
contributemostly wanted to experiment with the 'natural' setting on the K10DI think I used -2 saturation, 0 contrast, +1 sharpening but I adjusted it here and thereI also played with color correction in the WB but it wasn't too greatalso, /digishit/ general bread
PICTURE STYLE-1 high/low key adj.-1 contrast-2 sharpening
i give it credit anon for making East Maitland out of all places somewhat interestingneeds more rundown Henny Penny joints
>>4477534Should I nab wunna these lil niggas? I'm torn: on the one hand, the image quality is super flat with no options in-camera to adjust contrast but on the other hand it's a digishit that'll fit in the palm of my hand and I can (almost) pay for it with spare change unlike>*checks notes*literally every other 2000s digicam? for some reason.Wikipedia wanted me to credit this guy LMAO. Nah but, I can respect that.By Joffboff - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=56389131
>>4488930If it's like $20 yes, otherwise no.Also, sort ebay listings by 'for parts'. A lot of cameras listed as broken aren't actually broken and are just missing a battery or something. Hypesters trying to buy digishits aren't smart or brave enough to buy the sketchy ones.
>>4477534Anon these are beautiful
Who the fuck likes this focal length? What is its purpose?
>>4488750get closethat's the fucking secret to phone-like focal lengths. (there's a reason why 28mm looks like snapshits - because it's the snapshit focal length every teenage girl uses on her iphone)
>>4488750If you go wide, shoot wide subjects or get close as >>4488753 said. Seaside shots as well as in-car shots are two examples that benefit from proper wides.
>>4488753>>4488756Word, I'll creep up closer. Or shoot wide landscapes. Also the wider lenses for this camera are expensive. If I can't make 28mm work I'll probably just go back to shooting 50 and 135.
>>4488725i'll see you in court.
>>4488750Get 28mm vision in your mind. It usually can be acquired by getting closer to subject and observing the environment before shootong. Wide angles are difficult because our vision is usually much narrower.But some dudes mentioned about >muh zooming with your feet It's a meme. If you make a change in the distance between camera and the subject, you will get different result. It just doesnt work. On this matter, i recommend to think of composition based on the distance between you and the subject, rather than focal lengh of your lens and the subject.
What's /p/'s opinion on one of the most viewed (online) photographers?>Sex And Takeout is an ongoing viral series on the unnecessary and unkind social boundaries and cultural taboos forced upon women’s bodies. By indulging in sex and junk food, Bahbah proposes a celebration of the self. Inspired by her personal battle with disordered eating, Sex And Takeout is a declaration of overcoming guilt and shame. Through this series, Bahbah unpacks expectations of femininity and challenges her own standards of beauty.
>>4488296You speak to the sort of goblin that says asking why jews are exempt from ukranian drafts is antisemitic
>>4488296It’s all the idiotic shit you just throw in casually to try to make your point, between your cringe Nazi rhetoric is the part that I like. Apparently in your absolutely fucked understanding of this species, gluttony is a male problem and women are just imitating it? Bc bitches don’t overeat and have eating disorders & turn into whales? You do alternate between sounding like a total fucking moron and like you’re one realization (that education is a Jewish conspiracy brainwashing the children) away from being featured on the news face down.
>>4488370Gluttony as a glorification of the self IS a male vice.>I am the manliest man here. I can eat more, and worse, food than anyone else. I eat pizza every day. I eat burgers for breakfast and steak for lunch. Beer is my water. Whisky is my blood. Salad and quiche are for gay fucking bitches. I'm having a great time. Et tu, BITCH?This is distinctly male. It's a masochism ritual adjacent to eating whole hot peppers raw. It's a low grade pain/eating bitterness test. It is distinctly masculine.And regardless of what it is, it is BAD FOR EVERYONE INVOLVED AND SHOULD NEVER BE ENCOURAGED.>that education is a Jewish conspiracy brainwashing the childrenOh, certain facets of education are absolutely jewish conspiracies. Critical race theory and modernized equity (each maintain jews as a people who deserve to remain distinct and privileged) are distinctly jewish concepts. They are mandated by jewish religious belief. Another jewish aspect of education is framing all american wars as for global peace when they only advance israeli interests and establish central banks which inevitably tie back to 100% jewish families that owe their wealth to charlamagne. You know jews exist and aren't a boogeyman right? They are the white privilege you heard so much about.Until they're sick of non-jews, then they're not white. They're oppressed.
>>4488002Cool post other than the latent belief in the progressive theory of history
looks like an art school project, bad lighting included
at what age and how did you find that you were into photography/videography?
>>4476808At 41yo, when I inherited all 14,000 of my fambly photos to deal with. Gaddauym, fuggin SLIDES?? Wtf man, what am I going to do with all these fucking things, I should just toss em. And negatives, I can’t even see what’s on those to figure out if I have prints of em.Start scanning prints, everything looketh like shit, look up how to better scan olde photos in highest quality…. 5 years later I’ve got a degree w a minor in photo, built my own slide/neg drum digitizer & processes, shoot architecture (not real estate) for a living w MF digishit & LF environmental/birding/macro for fun. And I’m still only 10% of the way through those slides, w 50 fucking started projects surely never to be completed, like a true artiste.
>>4488889Pay a shop to do it @ $20 per roll lmao.
>>448888914kf frames?Someone I know bought a cheapo canon rebel and sigma 70mm macro and valoi scanning kit to do 750 negs and did the laziest ever negative lab pro fixes because their family’s standard was "as long as we can tell whats on them"Good luck!
>>4488889Bless you for going through the collection, plus now you can turn your relative into the next Vivian MeyerPost some for us
>>4488889post your family anon
Reply if you're a real mf'er
finally got a roll back with more images i like than ones i hate, good feeling bros
>>4488875
>>4488875ok, now post the ones that you like
>>4488886
>>4487796She looks like Urbosa lmao
Last days of 2025 editionAll video related questions and discussion is intended for this thread. Here we discuss techniques, gear and anything else related to capturing video footage. Please don't pretend to be an expert if you don't know what you're talking about. Kindly leave your ego at the door.Posting short films/scripts or other work you've done is encouraged.We tend to use and recommend DSLRs/mirrorless cameras because they provide phenomenal picture quality for their price, have large sensors (ie the same size used in high-end cinema cameras and higher) and have interchangeable lenses.In contrast, consumer camcorders often have much smaller sensors and a fixed lens.>STICKY - https://text.is/QZ1J>Helpful guide, additional books and more in-depth FAQs - https://web.archive.org/web/20200926115310/https://pastebin.com/kG0gRmTZ>NO ONE CARES WHAT AN EXPERT YOU THINK YOU ARE. IF YOU’RE ASKING BASIC-AS-SHIT QUESTIONS, YOU CAN’T BE ALL THAT GREAT. SEE ABOVEPrevious thread >>4467259Quick FAQSComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4487998or you could go full doyle
How do you manage storage when traveling? Ahead is a 3 weeks trip to Japan where I most likely shoot my new Nikon ZR daily. Now I could easily shoot in h265, 4k/25 and call it a day, not worrying about storage. But obviously the red raw is really nice and I wanna shoot in that probably. However after just 40 mins my 512gb cf express card is full. That would definitely be enough for one full day for me. My usual workflow is to directly cut the footage together in davinci, export in h265 and delete all raw files. So no storage issues. But I doubt I wanna edit daily when traveling. Should I buy a 10TB harddrive or so? How would you do it?
>>4488793>anon learns the reason why nikon cameras are impractical for video the hard way
>>4488793Grab a couple of portable 2.5" SSDs (or buy a M.2 storage key where you can slot in your own disks on a USB adapter). Sure it'll cost you a couple hundred dollars, but there's no way to avoid that. Spinning disks WILL get jossled around enough that you risk damage.You could directly upload your footage to a cloud-based system via a laptop but that requires you to bring a laptop on your trip and have a cloud service you're paying for (free services are going to give you fuck all storage). Google drive is only like $7 for 2TB of storage, so I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to find a different service with greater storage.
>>4488793shoot lightweight files and get it right in camera
this was the absolute peak of digital photography and its all been downhill after here. seriously look at the shots on flickr with this tag and how good they look. mirrorless is super sterile and fake looking, and older than the mkii just were shit to use and had too much noise. seriously dont sleep on these, 5d mkii and some EF L glass has u covered and then u can spend the rest of the money on travel and taking kino shots.
>>4487866>vertical grips>duplicate controlsThe D4 has those things already and doesn't need a grip bolted onto it.>>4487849D2X is a very fine camera, if I hadn't got the scorching deal on my 4 I may have got one, I looked at a couple. I like the bigger screen on the 4.>>4487822I did get this for the FPS I do motorsports from time to time and things moving at speed. Realistically, you don't need more than 20mp unless you are printing super huge like above movie poster size.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4488403>The D4 has a vertical grip minus the feature where you can remove itWhy does it need to be so big when an EOS 1n weighs no where near that much and focuses faster? Nikon lost. Canon won. Sorry lil fella, YWN be in focus.
>>4488403Resolution isn't just about printing big, it gives you flexibility when cropping. If the 16mp of the D4 does you fine then a 36mp would get you that with an APS-C crop, a 42mp body gets you a little over 1.6, 60mp gets you almost 2x crop. That means you can use smaller, lighter, cheaper lenses, or simply get more reach with what you have. Back in the day you had to make a choice between resolution and speed but that's not so much the case these days, at least to get an acceptable level of speed (matching the D4) because 20fps is largely unnecessary and just a skill cope.
>>4488493Resolution is also about recognizing that digital looks like shit. Bayer just turns small details into vomit so it takes like 30mp for it to look as normal as 35mm film.
>>4488495Could you share us a 35mm scan that looks better than 30mp digital?
>"Black and white are the colors of photography. To me they symbolize the alternatives of hope and despair to which mankind is forever subjected." Robert Frank.>"I work in colour sometimes, but I guess the images I most connect to, historically speaking, are in black and white. I see more in black and white – I like the abstraction of it." Mary Ellen MarkI see a pattern. One of making the world increasingly drab to demoralize the people. Look up their early lives.
>>4487132
>>4487132>Everything is either white, black, or a shade of grey. Maybe you see a couple blue and red cars, and if you find something yellow or even green you've hit the jackpot for the dayMore of an /o/-tier whinge than /p/ but I feel like the sentiment applies here as well. Everything is just devoid of colour these days
>>4488786High Impact were the days
I'm only shooting for myself. Travel and family. Photo and video. What I learned is that video easily brings people to tears. Because it's so real, you can dive back in memories and experience everything once more. Photography is different. You look at the images and it only activates emotions IF you use them to remember back that moment. B&W photos make it easier to remember back because it makes your brain start thinking. You don't get the exact image of a situation but more a vague interpretation in form of a colorless scene. So I believe that this is the reason why b&w photography is so emotional for many while color photos just collect dust forever on your hdd. But that is just my idea and I don't know if thats any true. Once the Ricoh GR4x mono appears I use it as an excuse to learn more about it
>>4487148Black and white is harder because you can only rely on light and composition
Insta threadWill follow anyone>horgen_fotoHad anyone got tips on how to find less popular content?The algorithm is just feeding me terrible tiktok reels with millions of views all day long.
>>4487932>in fact, it was not him.
Can anyone guide or help me to recovering my account? I noticed that my account's email got mysteriously changed but I was in the middle of a trip to be able to do anything about it. And now I can't access it at all because the faggot who took it changed the passwords.
What is the best export setting for this piece of trash website? It burled the fuck out of my photos. I uploaded them from website and they were fine but phone they look like they were taken on a fucking potato FUUUUCCCK
>>4488603Zuck will ask you to send him videos of your butthole. Contact the insta team asap
>>4488784That's not due to any export setting. Instagram often just likes to not show the full (Instagram) resolution of images when you view them. Sometimes it "pops in" after a short while, but it has nothing to do with your local connection. It is insta deciding not to give your images bandwidth.
