>>215553375I got it too, it's great.
>>215551036that is one tiny wrist
Binks.
>>215553375basically the only upgrade to this is a MIP screen variant
>>215553375>>215553837I think one of the coolest G-Shock factoids is that it got its own NATO reference number because it was so popular with the troops.
If Natalie Portman came back to do Mathilda, what would it be about?
>>215553832Didn't they already make that movie like 20 years ago
her relationship with a young boy
Her psychic powers are growing out of control and a fiery young Latina who also has psychic powers joins up with her. Also the mean principal comes back with robot spider legs.
>>215553832It would be about 20 years too late
This was even confirmed by the writers.>But I thought it was Jason!The writers confirmed it wasn't him.>But Sam died in the first movie!No. Sam was infected from the bite, and he could have healed instantly to prevent his death.
>>215553849You misspelled LOSTGOD
>>215553801>how come this mid-budget movie produced in 1999 doesn't have 4k PNG photographs?
>>215553802They should bring Tatiana Maslany back as Ghost
>>215542778So what happened to Jason? He only got one dose of the antidote and didn't even know what it was, he should have fully turned a long time ago.
>>215553907why did he kill his family?
it's supposed to scare people, and apparently rape is regarded as the worst you can do to someone, by many people. so why not have villains raping people in movies? hehe this guy just sliced off a guys face and wore it! but him putting his pp in a hot girl? inconceivable!
>>215553592>Horror people are almost all far lefties.True, look at this faggot from YT for example.
>>215547191Apparently Billy and Stu raped Sidneys Mom before killing her but its off camera
>>215553358Jason is an incubus. He rapes women in their sleep.
>>215553592>Rape is rare and shocking in moviesRape is just a guy using violence to get his dick wet, it happens all the time in real life. Having the desire to kill innocent people in fucked up ways is more interesting than wanting to get off. And there probably have been horror movies where the killer was also a rapist, but they're probably not as famous because it's not an interesting premise.There's also the factor of being able to appease the villain. If they just want money or something, and giving them money makes them go away, they aren't scary. If a girl can just willingly open her legs and satisfy the guy, he's not a scary slasher villain, he's just some guy. The whole point is that their main drive is to kill, and that they can't be reasoned or pleaded with. They are here to kill, and if they catch up to the victim, they will kill them. Adding lust as a motivator makes it less interesting.
>>215553940Rapists who are after power and control don't want women to give themselves up willingly and even if they do give themselves up out of fear the rapist will often need to torture their victim in order to get off. It's less about achieving and orgasm than it is about satisfying the rapists desire to feel powerful by abusing and terrifying his victim. Freddy Krueger embodies before his death was written to be that kind of person.
It was absolute kino.
>>215553704You're not wrong. I love YolanD Visserts.
Elysium was such a shitheap that I never trusted this director again
>>215553863Modern 'derts still crammable
He kept making the same film and it got worse every time
Baskin bitch
>1A 1A 1AWhat's the frame data on this? Can you block punish it?
>>215553842How is Luthor able to process commands for a creature moving at super-speed
>actress puts on a little weight>looks even betterWhat are some prime examples?
>>215553046All of them. Leading Hwood actresses are too thin now and need to eat. It's more extreme than ever.
>>215553046Almost all of em... Amy Schumer is the only exception i can think off right now
>>215553085fpbp
LOOK AT THE BONES
>>215553099You don't. You put it to bed and give it a cup of hot milk to help it sleep.
>>215553819
>>215553099Elmer Fudd is that you? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weHNnsMY82A
>>215545597he plonk
>>215552770There is a whole island in Japan infested with bunnies. They always flock to tourists, fully expecting to be fed.
>horrible digital photography, dubious lighting, and bad CGI>soap opera tier dialogue (some of it so bad that I refuse to believe it was lifted from Shelley)>Oscar Isaac, one of the best actors of his generation, gives a completely undirected performance, flailing and gurning>as always, the monster dindu nuffin (didn’t it murder William and Elizabeth in the book?)Aside from the predictably impeccable production design and Elordi’s performance, this film was completely pedestrian and underwhelming. What the fuck?? I thought this is something that Del Toro has worked at and thought about for decades, why is the direction on the level of a high school play? An interesting contrast for this film is Eggers’ Nosferatu: both are idee fixe passion project classic horror remakes, with roots reaching back into the physically meticulous writer-director’s childhood, yet Nosferatu -- which is by no means a perfect film -- completely mogs Frankenstein and succeeds in all the things this film failed at.
>>215551970>as always, the monster dindu nuffinWhy do all these writers misconstrue Mary Shelley’s story all the time?
>>215551970>Overproduces sets that added nothing to the story>Adds characters that could have been completely cut out>Every animal was CGI >Gives actors a barebones script that they clearly struggled to work with>Victor has a similar cartoonish plot armor as the monsterIt was a boring slog that felt longer than it was
>>215551970>why is the direction on the level of a high school play?FUCKING THIS
>>215551970Didn't mind Isaac's performance and the twist of making the monster more sympathetic, and generally I didn't have a problem with the dialogue (except for William's last line being "you are the monster), but I will give you the point about the CGI. It was shockingly bad.
>>215553964Disappointing. I expected the movie to be shit but I thought atleast the visuals would be nice
>when you grow up with 8 brothers
I'm planning to see this classic for the first time.Is it THAT good ?
>>215553744I thought it was good, but not the super amazing musical masterpiece it was hyped up to be. There are much better musicals out there, Sound of Music, My Fair Lady, Hello Dolly, to name a few.
Very good, VERY funny, deliberately so.The only mark against it would be that it haspick and chosen its songs from older musicals.
>>215553744Yeah, it's great. Fun, funny, cute, great music, looks fantastic, even an early example of postmodernism in film. Enjoy it, quite a treat.
>>215553780Sleeping on The Music Man and White Christmas in those classic recs. I'll even throw out a curve all, the Martin & Lewis vehicle Artists & Models, featuring a young Shirley MacLaine (rowr!)
>>215553744No, it's one of the gayest movies ever made despite not having any gay people in it.
Funhoe editionprev: >>215535880
The Happening is unbelievable. It's like a dreamlike comedy skit or like a really outrageous 80s B-movie.
>>215553958director interview for Clown in a CornfieldGWAR episode for awful movie Jack-Omake of that what you will, nothing too obnoxious at least if you like the show
>>215553706iirc theres really only a one-off throwaway gay joke. shock treatment is about freaky incest things, shame 90% of the music is extremely beat-for-beat derivative and they lost the bostwickino.
>>215553304last year was so warm. This year it's been brutal and it expecting to rain as well>east coast fag
>>215554029Might check it out then, I stopped watching a year or two ago due to the overt troonery.
Why are they incapable of creating characters that oppose their views without turning them into caricatures?
>>215548447>To see the leftist version of this see: The Boys.The boys is actually the opposite, bizarrely, they always shoehorn some pointless positive quality on the villains as a pathetic attempt at moral superiority in pretending they are le party of empathy, when they are never so understanding of "environmental factors" in real life
>>215552176it was at the time it came out, there was a brief era where breadtubers tried to own the beta onions look to redefine it as cool healthy masculinity or something but quickly stopped because it was fucking retarded and they just got laughed at more
>>215545532I think that's the most telltale sign of being uncreative and just unworldly in general. We have some idea of archetypes but very rarely can people be pigeonholed into a complete living stereotype, most people have numerous idiosyncrasies that run counter to the assumptions you'd make on them based on their surface level personality. There's a 30 year old at my work who vapes, drives a JDM Eclipse, wears Vans and flat brim hats who's an ultra-conservative Christian Nationalist. There's also a 40 year old toothless former roughneck with the thickest accent you ever heard that's a capital D democrat. Watching characters behave 100% as we expect them to is not only boring, it isn't even true to reality.
>>215545532I don't know who this is.
>>215550102>>215549375>>215545705Absolutely zero self-awareness.
Why did she only star in a few crappy slop films when she was in her prime? She was a certified hottie.
>>215553850Kill yourself
>>215553840This.>>215553826Also blue/green eyes would have elevated her career. She was still pretty but much more dime a dozen with those features and that coloring.
>>215553826Name one thing she excelled in
>>215553936Catching arrows with her boobs
>>215553826Taylor Swift putting a fatwa on her didn't help.
A thread for the discussion of arthouse and classic cinema.Reject lustful imagery editionQOTDWhat's your favorite sexless film?
>>215553809Brother Sun, Sister Moon
>>215553799I don't know but it's probably very stupid.
>>215553568>>215552226>*gives your waifu paranoid schizophrenia*
>>215553993'fufags status?
>>215553960Was just looking at movie when you posted it. Very strange synchirnticy or whatever Jung said
