'turn away from the light' edition[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelFinePix AX300Camera Softwaredarktable 4.6.1Maximum Lens Aperturef/3.3Maker Note Version0130Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:05:18 21:23:21Exposure Time1/450 secF-Numberf/5.1Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating100Lens Aperturef/5.1Brightness8.5 EVExposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length21.40 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1440Image Height2881RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknownSharpnessNormalWhite BalanceAutoChroma SaturationNormalFlash ModeOffMacro ModeOffFocus ModeAutoSlow Synchro ModeOffPicture ModeProgram AEContinuous/Bracketing ModeOffBlur StatusOKFocus StatusOKAuto Exposure StatusOK
Fujifilm FinePix JX500.
>>4329808leanin' an' mean
>be me>see random youtuber-photographer>5m subs in a few years>nothing special, just "random" girls with daddy issue>he's living my dream>the guy is good looking and tall so when he takes a picture the girls a happy>his gear costs $7k>immediately remember why I lost interest in photography the last time>I'm ugly and poor, I'm afraid to go outside and draw any attention to myself with a $500 camera and a kit lense >I've never overcome this feel, I simply forgot Why live?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4329953It's lens
>>4330011Yes. I'm a thirdie
Since the world is soon getting filled with wind turbines, I want to document what little is available to me through photography. What do I need to know about landscape? What is the standard gear for this? Can you do landscape photography with a shitty APS-C? Do people who do landscape usually know about predicting weather conditions?
>>4329909Pressing a button is winographyPhotography is a bit more involved than f/8 and be there
>>4329868>wide for close things tele for things that are far awayI hate how often people think this way. If you get close to a subject and zoom out you will be taking a different photo. Wide angles are for bringing in more elements and teles are for simplifying scenes. Look up perspective distortion. It's really important to use this thoughtfully and a good reason to use a zoom (though film-era zooms can suck).
>>4329913You're thinking in terms of FOMO.
Does gear really matter? Are people buying more that 1 camera retarded consumers? Is me farting at the lens affecting it's quality?
shitty aps is nice for landscape[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D200Camera SoftwareUfraw & Imagemagick & ExiftoolImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution301 dpiVertical Resolution301 dpiExposure Time1/320 secF-Numberf/9.0ISO Speed Rating100Focal Length45.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibrated
>be me>spends 10k+ on camera gear the past 2 years>turns my end game setup is a Pentax LX and the 35-70mm f/3.5-4.5>a fucking $30 lens on a $300 body>mfw
>>4329659It's my first street set so I'll welcome it. Wouldn't be the first time I got my ass handed to me lol>>4329639I really got it more as a souvenir but I will probably keep it and sell my Tammy 180 I liked it a lot more than the 180 and it can do everything the 180 does, better, in a package half the size. I think 35 and 100 is the optimal street walkaround carry piece.
>>4329607This is sort of true. Printing is a hugely important thing that a lot of people don't do. I would argue you don't need to own a printer necessarily. You can get 8x10 for example from walmart or vistaprint for pennies if you get a batch. Just send out an order every month, and you'll barely be out anything. Personally I like making a photo book at least once a year.
>>4329009Thank you and must just be the characteristics of the jupiter 8 i was using when i shot this
Because you're fucking insecure faggots, I use my phone camera and make photos 100x better than yours
>>4329754lol no one cares
>Mamiya RZ67 Professional>Mamiya-Sekor Z 90mm>Mamiya RZ67 Pro II Magazine (120)>Extra magazine>PD Prism Finder>Original Mamiya camera strap>Mamiya RZ67 Extension Tube 82mm (No. 2)>polaroid back>lens hoodHow much would you pay for this given the gear is in good condition?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Camera SoftwareAndroid UP1A.231005.007.A546BXXS6BWL3Image-Specific Properties:Image Width1080Image Height2340Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:06:23 20:20:30Unique Image ID33c75770-9c2e-4948-b5f5-9b87689957bcLight SourceUnknown
>>432993290%? I shoot for magnum everything is comped, ya pleb dadographer
>>4329937Cope
>>4329893IKR those scheiss lens are out of this world. Coping japcrap users.
>>4329956>>4329936Tell it to a mirror dadographer. You do not shoot for magnum. Your film will never be comped.>>4330031Japscrap users will never stop coping about zeiss and leica superiority>but muh mtf chart! Cosina voigtlander? More like iseea thirdworlder lol
>>4330040Lol I have no ideas what comped means. Try starting a business or shooting for brands (you never will, ever).
How much is talent important when it comes to photography?Can you have someone picking up a camera for the first time and making good pics, even if they never learned any of the rules or studied the masters?Just by having "an eye" for taking interesting shots?Because we already know that having the best gear and copying the masters won't make you a good photographer, if we look at everyone who posted here over the years.
>>4329393It's falsely considered art because it serves the same function as painting.It's a craft.
>>4329139Im sorry which part of Avatar looked real to you?
This is the worst thread I've ever read. Photography is all Studying, nobody is born with an eye for composition, just like nobody is born knowing how to play the piano. Gear doesn't matter for the most part.
>>4329410The parts that were done digitally
gear matters realist>knows the limitations and possibilities that different gear offers>has seen what gear great photographers use and why>understands image quality is important to photography>it is obvious to him that the photographers skill and knowledge of the medium and their gear are essential gear doesn't matter pseud>can't stop with the "gear is the only thing that matters" strawman>poor>thinks anything can be compensated with skill >will make any tradeoff for better convinience >"but you can make a good photo with bad gear">does not know how a view camera works
Spoopy Edition>Post the spookiest shit you've ever emprisoned in a silver halide cage for all eternity/fgt/ daily reminder (courtesy by anon): one stop per decade is (generally) bullshit>negative film ages better than positive>black and white better than color>slow films better than fast>storage conditions (dry/cool) matter more than years>Negative film is shot 1 or 2 stops overexposed and then PULLED in development so that you build more density in the exposure and develop less such that the fog is limited>slide/positive film is shot at box speed or overexposed and pulled.>if you home develop you can also use benzotriazole as a restrainer for the the first developer in E6 processUseful links>[massive dev chart] gives times for home film developmentComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4330043I didn't either, I still kind of don't, I just use Darktable to make some minor color corrections by eye so my things look better. After doing it a bit I found myself being able to tell slightly more easily how something has color shifted and how to correct it. Darktable is free, give it a try. Small learning curve but probably worth trying.
>>4330045I've been messing with it a bit, but I often feel like I make things worse[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4330046this one looks less tinted so you're on the right track, I think
>>4330048lol that one is unedited[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4330049oh. lol. good compositions though IMO.
>buy $100 film camera>breaks after 5th photo>buy $50 film camera>light leak>buy $200 film camera>breaks after 2nd roll of filmWhat the fuck? Am I being baited into trying film? Do filmfags think their cameras work when they don't or would break if they actually used them?
>>4328355Get a fucking F65 and move on with your life.
>>4328865Or an FM3aIt has the larp factorIt has a lot of tehcnical capabilityIt's indestructibleOnly flaw: It's the m4/3 of film. 35mm. 1/4 the imaging area of the minimum for real photos.
>>4328355maybe you're just being retarded when using them, idk anon maybe try to learn how to use a camera instead of wasting money
>>4328874My logic is that cheap plastic consumer SLRs sold just before digital took over all have brand new shutters because nobody ever used them. F65 is great if you don't mind lack of DoF preview, but F75 is good too. F80+ will be more used because enthusiasts/pros.
>>4328355>buy $25 film camera>it breaks after 3 years>buy $5 film camera>it just works>get free film camera (minolta SLR)>it just works>realize actually the flash won't work>also the film speed thing breaks cause it's shit plastic>get another free film camera (Zeiss scale focus)>it just works>get another free camera (minolta SLR)>it just works (until I tumbled down a fucking slope with it and now it just doesn't work half the time)basically my most reliable camera is mechanical, made of metal, does not have an interchangeable lens or mirrors, and is very simple. Maybe that's something to keep in mind. The 90s shitboxes are really fragile in comparison, plastic bad also
Z6iii edition, get in here ladshttps://youtu.be/2Y_flF14PtY?si=jw7QiYqK7PNeOI1x[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1080Image Height2400Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>4329874I love the FL. I am considering picking up the 50 and 75 Speed Panchros LLL is putting out once they're out there. Would be cool to have a whole set and get them rehoused.
>>4329912>They are functionally much worse than Fuji dialsbecause of the lock?
>>4329975Locks are part of it. Fuji just locks/unlocks wherever. Zf only and always locks on 1/3, B, X, T, which gets in the way.Auto ISO is dogshit on the Zf. The ISO dial doesn't override it, and enabling/disabling it via custom button can only be done when on C, so you always have to disable first, then change. I basically never use Auto ISO with it.On X-T's, I find the location actually very accessible from the thumb, and use it like a normal command dial. The Zf is much more stiff and in a location such that it really requires moving your hand to change. I end up just leaving it on 1/3 step and using the regular dials.On Fuji's, the dials allow for quick full stop adjustment, and then you can use the regular dials to fine tune +/- 2/3 ev.
>>4330003Both are retarded. Nikon, canon, and sony have near identical ergos for a reason. Good isnt a preference. Everyone has the same hands, just different sizes. The dials are bad. They were designed for camera manufacturing (cheaper assembly and cheaper mechanical linkages), not hands, which is why they’re never on “normal” cameras and havent been for almost 40 years, just special released marketed specifically for the larp. Nikon just slapped them on an already abandoned z6-2.5 like they did with the df to raise money via clueless hipsters before the current batch finally wised up.
>>4330021I don't view things so black & white, everything has pros and cons, and different people like different things. Worst case, I just ignore them and use the regular dials like normal, best case it gives me extra control options, not less.It must be such a burden to be upset with other people like different things.
What's your favorite 35mm roll?[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpi
>>4329770got my scans sooner than expected, but only 21/24 frames. I'll need to wait till monday to pick up the negatives and see what might have happened[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4329998this one and several others have that black bar on the left, not sure what's up with that[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4330000[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNORITSU KOKICamera ModelEZ ControllerCamera SoftwareEZ Controller 6.20.027 (141211)Image-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width3130Image Height2075
>>4330000Fucked scan, they stuck it on auto mode and didnt check if anything actually lined up.Also the fact the bar is the same sickly orange as the rest of the image means auto mode boosted the shadows probably due to underexposure.a rescan or a home scan would make these pics look so much better.
>>4329773Push it one stop and enjoy.
ITT: Post a picture, tell a story about it.This was taken in Busan, South Korea. It's hard to see, but it was drizzling a bit at the time, and a few minutes later, it was pouring rain. I didn't bring an umbrella, and I was completely lost. I stopped under an awning outside of a restaurant to use my phone, and a Korean guy (maybe in his 40s) who happened to be driving by at the time stopped his car, got out, handed me an umbrella, got back in his car, and drove off, all without saying a single word. I tried to politely refuse (I actually like the rain), but he wouldn't take his umbrella back.
>>4315091best pic and story ITT
>>4315091Reflecting on the story of the picture, I understand that feeling of bitterness from loss after my grandmother passed away. I know losing a grandmother is a joke to a lot of people, but she was the mother of my life for a long time when my actual mother couldn't take care of me due to her mental disabilities.
>>4326272Did you accidentally bore her to death when you showed her your pictures?
>>4326285Lol
bump?
So, how many of you will pay Ken Rockwell and his Growing Family™ $500 to have him follow you around the Sierra Nevada, ordering you to turn saturation to +5?
>>4329939>heavy chromatic aberration>saturation cranked way up>sharpness is so extreme to the point the leaves look straight out of ps1 era>color banding due to a mix of all of the aboveI know you're just a shitposter, but come on man, nobody is going to fall for the bait that he's some how a good editor.
>>4329963Forgot to add, I do like the subject(think it's the tree he's going for, it's a dope tree) and the framing.But this image is CRUNCHY
>>4329930absolutely no shape to anything here. its in the hellish purgatory between a depiction and paint randomly thrown at a canvas. the man must have vision issues if this is what happens when he chooses his own edits. his film shots are fine.
>>4329978the thing that gets me since I found this thread, he actually has some decent shots that aren't fried to shit, but it's 1 in 10 and they usually are still CRANKED saturation wise. Rarely it's beneficial(pic rel, genuinely like this one although I would have toned it down a bit).
>>4329978The rockwell problem. All saturation, no contrast. No deep shadow. No white highlights. Just red, green, and blue. He legitimately has vision issues or a broken monitor.
Considering the newly announced Pentax 17 is an overpriced toy camera failure what are some alternatives in the half-frame gear world for half the price?
>>4329809>>4329816>>4329831
>be me>finally finishing torrenting all my animes after a week of waiting>watching rozen maiden and chobits>worst girl sususususeki is getting immortalized with a shitty meme>meanwhile "film is dying" and you can buy a hasselblad 500cm off a pro who thinks a nikon d4 for $250>i am ignoring this, too busy watching more anime>my mom gave me a nikon coolpix and an agfa rangefinder anyways im goodfuck anime. death to japan.
>>4329840so mad i had a stroke. anime wasted my youth. i could have been buying $4 portra and cheap 'blads and leicas. now everything is overpriced because everyone finally realized old stuff was good before i decided to be a big enough gearfag to shoot film.
>>4329840>worst girl sususususeki I am going to fucking kill you, desu
>>4326226$250 budget easily gets you an Olympus Pen F(v) and a 38mm/1.8. It's a full SLR so you don't have to guess focus. If you really need autofocus, get the Yashica Samurai (picrel) or the Canon Autoboy Tele 6.>>4326416If you're getting the Dial, look out for the 35-2. Canon upgraded from selenium to CdS meters on this revision.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeFUJIFILMCamera ModelX-T20Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2019 (Windows)PhotographerMIKE ECKMANSensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaFocal Length (35mm Equiv)75 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2019:03:19 18:53:47Exposure Time1/750 secF-Numberf/1.0Exposure ProgramAperture PriorityISO Speed Rating1000Lens Aperturef/1.0Brightness0.3 EVExposure Bias-1 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length50.00 mmColor Space InformationUncalibratedImage Width5604Image Height3736RenderingNormalExposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
Couch of the Creek Edition.Previous Thread: >>4323443[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Image-Specific Properties:Image Created2024:06:18 15:19:04Color Space InformationsRGB
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATIONCamera ModelNIKON D850Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.9 (Windows)Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.8Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color AreaColor Filter Array Pattern914Focal Length (35mm Equiv)15 mmImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution300 dpiVertical Resolution300 dpiImage Created2024:06:27 22:41:47Exposure Time1/640 secF-Numberf/8.0Exposure ProgramManualISO Speed Rating800Lens Aperturef/8.0Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModePatternLight SourceUnknownFlashNo FlashFocal Length15.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1605Image Height1068RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualWhite BalanceAutoScene Capture TypeStandardGain ControlLow Gain UpContrastNormalSaturationNormalSharpnessNormalSubject Distance RangeUnknown
>>4326624Resize ur shit bruh
>>4327378This is very nice but you've got a lot of black; it's almost your entire upper third. I'd crop it in a little.>>4326791This pleases me but you've sliced off the footsies.Digging the bokeh, orange glow at the bottom, and nice luster to the shadow tones owo>>4326813You've done the technical execution pretty well but I'm just not a fan of the subject matter and the composition is at once too busy and too bland. Your strong vertical line on the right side is off a few degrees counterclockwise, and your crop on the left side intersects another vertical line and pulls my eye abruptly away from the subject.>>4326841Overexposed; cropped too loose top and bottom. Pleasing atmosphere and some nice textures in the foliage and straw umbrellas. The line in the pavers is strong - triangular, one-point, etc. >>4326847As a Fuji shooter I object to the camera being used in this fashionComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>4327380I love trains! >>4327381Good vanishing point and even exposure but all of these are lacking in contrast or shadow detail for my taste.>>4327382>>4327384Very pleasing. I could nitpick - I'd say you could crop in tighter while retaining atmosphere and context. The horse barn in particular, I wish I could see that whole tree in the frame and have it all a little closer together. >>4327385A good technical exercise but not a very interesting subject and too monotone to be abstract. >>4327388>>4327387Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
I know I crushed the blacks too much.>>4327703No anon, but you're not a bad one. Aside from your diagonal and vertical lines there's not a lot of visual interest to grab the eye here. The hazy cityscape in the background and the path are part of a narrative, they could be more intriguing from a slightly different spot or more towards dusk. Your camera/lens combo (or you in post?) are rendering the foliage and stones with excessive sharpening. The image is flat and lacks good tonality. But it is in focus, it is composed, and you should go out and shoot more :)>>4327810You're right. My eye goes directly to the ad that you could so easily have content-aware patched. One million years dungeon>>4327833It's big OOF, as in out of focus. Also your sensor is dirty.>>4327953Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Old >>4260419[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G985FCamera SoftwareSnapseed 2.0Maximum Lens Aperturef/2.0Focal Length (35mm Equiv)28 mmImage-Specific Properties:Horizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:03:01 08:21:15Exposure Time1/306 secF-Numberf/2.0Exposure ProgramNormal ProgramISO Speed Rating50Lens Aperturef/2.0Brightness6.8 EVExposure Bias-0.6 EVMetering ModeSpotFlashNo FlashFocal Length5.90 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width1366Image Height910Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAutoDigital Zoom Ratio3Scene Capture TypeStandardUnique Image IDR64LLMF05VM
>>4290634Do you think it would look better if the ground wasn't so dark so you could actually see the texture ?
I dunno. Was the gfs present it just had really nice patterns.[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakesamsungCamera ModelSM-G998U1Camera SoftwareG998U1UESAFXD1Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8Focal Length (35mm Equiv)24 mmImage-Specific Properties:Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Image Height6752Image OrientationTop, Left-HandImage Created2024:06:20 20:50:15Vertical Resolution72 dpiHorizontal Resolution72 dpiImage Width12000Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVExposure ProgramNormal ProgramColor Space InformationsRGBUnique Image IDXA8XLNF00SMImage Height6752Brightness0.9 EVWhite BalanceAutoExposure ModeAutoExposure Time1/40 secFlashNo FlashF-Numberf/1.8ISO Speed Rating200Image Width12000Digital Zoom Ratio2Focal Length6.70 mmMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageScene Capture TypeStandardLight SourceUnknown
>>4323009
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeASUSCamera ModelASUS_I006DCamera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop 25.9 (Windows)Sensing MethodNot DefinedImage-Specific Properties:Image Width4576Image Height3432Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8Compression SchemeJPEG Compression (Thumbnail)Pixel CompositionRGBImage OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution72 dpiVertical Resolution72 dpiImage Created2024:06:28 01:11:01Exposure Time1504489/500000000 secF-Numberf/1.8Exposure ProgramNot DefinedISO Speed Rating25Lens Aperturef/1.8Exposure Bias0 EVMetering ModeCenter Weighted AverageLight SourceD65FlashNo Flash, CompulsoryFocal Length5.58 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width4576Image Height3432Exposure ModeAutoWhite BalanceAuto
"Dust, in MY lens?" Edition. Sending this one to Canon for cleaning. It's hardly been used and is filled with dust all over. This is lust the top left quarter.When taking portraits, face or full body, what apertures would you use for a 50mm or 80mm equivalent to get your subject in focus (more than just eyes) but keep the image a little soft elsewhere?Any rational for tightening the aperture versus keeping it wide open?Bump limit reached for last thread.Previous Thread: >>4319497[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]Camera-Specific Properties:Equipment MakeCanonCamera ModelCanon EOS R7Camera SoftwareDigital Photo ProfessionalLens Size18.00 - 150.00 mmFirmware VersionFirmware Version 1.5.0Lens NameRF-S18-150mm F3.5-6.3 IS STMImage-Specific Properties:Image OrientationTop, Left-HandHorizontal Resolution350 dpiVertical Resolution350 dpiImage Created2024:06:12 15:52:13Exposure Time1/125 secF-Numberf/40.0Exposure ProgramManualLens Aperturef/39.7Exposure Bias0 EVFlashNo FlashFocal Length150.00 mmColor Space InformationsRGBImage Width2000Image Height2000RenderingNormalExposure ModeManualScene Capture TypeStandardExposure ModeManualFocus TypeAutoMetering ModeCenter-WeightedISO Speed RatingAutoSharpnessUnknownSaturationNormalContrastNormalShooting ModeManualImage SizeUnknownFocus ModeUnknownDrive ModeUnknownFlash ModeOffCompression SettingFineMacro ModeNormalSubject Distance81.910 mWhite BalanceAutoExposure Compensation3Sensor ISO Speed180Color Matrix136
>>4329643Why do you need a gimbal or amazing IBIS for nature stuff? Are you running after the animals?
>>4329676He “needs” it because his favourite TokTubeGram influencer has all that stuff on xir’s list of “essentials for video”, duh.
>>4329686no, retard >>4329676i like to *move* around nature, so get this, i thought maybe a shot like walking along a pathbut of course projecting nigger retards like >>4329686 will automatically assume everyone else is like them or maybe im the fool for expecting actual advice from this board
>>4329643IBIS is a stills featureYou do not need, or want, IBIS for video. Shifting the sensor but not the lens warps the perspective which is visible in video as a trippy effect instead of what it looks like in stills (mild edge softness)For stills, if the IS/VR/whatever snoy calls it lenses are sufficient for you, you don't even need IBIS because lens IS provides ~3 stops which is enough for anyone really. But if they are not you want IBIS to get 3-5 stops of IS with any lens you choose.
How do you organize your photos? I used to sort them into dated folders, but as I've become more critical and delete more, I'll often end an outing with one or two shots that don't justify their own folder. Also, where do you put your RAWs? Loose in the same folder? Subfolder? Entirely different directory?