>>96467469
Ooh yeah? Name one wizard who's also a king. I'll wait.

>>96469648
>his EFFING skin!
God I hate reddit

>>96473446
You're thinking of FROMslop, aka TES for zoomers

>>96469606

*Quaffs potion of resist arrest*

>>96473528

Malekith from WHF.

File: depositphotos_591305804-s(...).png (4.66 MB, 1600x1167)

4.66 MB PNG

>>96473218
good luck anon
>>96473222
i would advice against mushrooms and other stuff that sticks out unless they are on the same base as trees as they will break and or scrape to shit eventually

>>96471649
I have been using the mould remover from GW for metal minis and I think it works quite well
Yes I know
>

Crusader miniatures makes loose shields and iirc even transfers for them
But it's more for historical stuff
Scibor Monstrous Miniatures has dwarves shield
Tabletop art also has loose shields

1x3mm will be plenty strong

File: Archknight.jpg (75 KB, 1263x947)

75 KB JPG

>>96471789
What do you think about the Archknight from the Cities of Sigmar command box?

File: 1rfe1h1mnuo91.jpg (100 KB, 640x640)

100 KB JPG

>>96473285
He looks decent, but I feel like an archon should have a more impressive pose.

File: 20250904_180259.jpg (315 KB, 1014x886)

315 KB JPG

on a whim i bought a pot of armypainter quickshade that had been sitting on lgs shelf for a better part of 15 years, clerk said it was there when he started working there and that was 10 years ago and i remember seeing that banged up can even before that

liquid was completely clear and when i dug deep all the particles were solified to the bottom, there was this 15mm layer of mudlike pigment cement that i mixed to the best of my abilities
after an hour of shaking i tried it again and this is what i came up with
beautiful innit

>>96473368
>Possibly! He's got a lot of time to try a lot of professions. Before and after sainthood.
One imagines a lot of cultivators dabble in many fields. If you’ve got the time you may as well try new things, you might just find something you enjoy.

>I imagine Ritsukas a danm good chef to though if thats considered with intent made behind it.
>Midna, thinking: I know those two are adoptive siblings, but whenever they cook they act more like lovesick newlyweds.

File: loading screen tip-The four.png (7 KB, 783x122)

7 KB PNG

>>96473457
>One imagines a lot of cultivators dabble in many fields. If you’ve got the time you may as well try new things, you might just find something you enjoy.
Definitely. Hell a 1000 years is a long time let alone eternity. It's healthy to keep picking up new things. Or things that are taken on a immortal time scale. Like some immensely complicated board game.

>>Midna, thinking: I know those two are adoptive siblings, but whenever they cook they act more like lovesick newlyweds.
>Venti would then look directly at her and offer her some homemade chocolate.


...Hm dumb thought: But do you think this hylia would have much of a sense of humor? Thinking of eventual potential scenes with her. Having a goddess opens up some possibilities for things early.

>>96473220
Resonance Rings + Allfather's Hand from Dark Souls

File: 1727050711879405.png (1.52 MB, 1500x2092)

1.52 MB PNG

>>96462891
how bad of an idea is companioning Valgavoth? on the one hand, big evil demon dude who is a threat to an entire plane, but on the other hand you giving him his greatest wish should put him firmly in your debt.

>>96473539
>Like some immensely complicated board game.
You don’t want to know what the rulebooks for the games second realm cultivators play look like.

>...Hm dumb thought: But do you think this hylia would have much of a sense of humor?
>Hylia: I am not one to make jokes, nor should you try using me as the subject of one, but I do appreciate humor, and I myself will employ wit on occasion.

>Thinking of eventual potential scenes with her. Having a goddess opens up some possibilities for things early.
What are you thinking of?

>>96473501
Indeed, proponents of the system say it's worth it for the fact it speeds up the game.
It seems to be a trend lately.

>>96473501
You've identified why it's unpopular

>>96473488
That sounds extremely gay, you don’t even cut out the step of adding your to-hit rolls together (it’s just pilot die + d6 instead of 2d6) but you make your rolls into an all-or-nothing affair. Why would anybody want that?

>>96473608
Because Alpha Strike players are extremely lazy.

>>96473523
Until both players keep rolling 1s and 2s for their pilot dice. You don't even get chip damage with this system.

>>96472689
>>96473226
The changes in play are largely subtle most of the time. Tanky melee classes tank better and don't have to worry about spells, but 99% of monsters don't wear armor and largely focus on melee anyway.
It makes Martial BBEGs an actually terrifying threat rather than a joke though.
>>96473226
>but still woefully inadequate to make any real difference at high levels
Not if you go deep into the crafting autism. It's pretty easy(if expensive) to get a +20-30 total bonus to saves off armor alone. Monsters rarely have the DCs to overcome that unless I optimize them for high spell DCs specifically.

>>96473437
Exactly. Which is why it's weird fot anon to get bent out of shape over it existing.

>>96471389
people use a lot of the higher level stuff (though not epic) in e6

>>96473437
>There are way cheaper ways of getting sure you can get your attack off. Hell, attack bonus is one of your least problems if you are a full-BAB class.
It's not just about hitting, it's about hitting while trading as much of your BAB for power attack as possible. The two primary ways I know of are wraithstrike (target touch AC which is usually much lower) and heedless charge (power attack gives -AC rather than -to hit)
>>96473437
>>96473486
I'd price it at 16,000,000 gp, 8kk pricing for weapon enhancement bonus, doubled for unusual bonus type. In other words, I don't want that item in my game.

>>96468116
Most DMs are annoyed by obvious abuse of the rules. As for warlocks, outside of shenanigans (which dumbass players obviously wanted to abuse) , they were never seen as particularly munchkiny.

>>96471488
Yes, but it would be out of place in the equipment section of the character sheet. Or character cardboard, I guess.

>>96471671
Wouldn't be any more out of place than the current text.

Casting with 2-handed big bonk is a go?

>>96471504
>"HEY EVERYONE GET MAD ABOUT THING!!!"
>"We don't care, we don't play that game."
>"REEEE YOU DONT PLAY ANYTHING THEN!!!"

>>96471442
I respect and support this decision

>>96472621
>Second Edition
"second season" is the GW branding, this is more like 13th edition?
And no, people are only playing 2020 (and will only play 2025) because it's the current gw product, and it will live only so long as that status is maintained.
the 6th community edition (Living Rule Book 6) is the latest edition of the game that survived on it's own merit of being a good game that people wanted to play.
It is also the last version of the game to be designed with the involvement of the man who invented the game, as well as the last vrsion of the game to be released as a complete game all at once AND is the last version of the game to be playtested with a goal of making th game balanced and fun to play.
You say you are getting your friends into the game, so you aren't relying on the existence of an already established group, which means you can buy whatever team miniatures you want and play with whatever rules you want, so the free and complete LRB6 is a valid option here, you can play that and still buy whatever minis GW makes as they come out.

>>96472652
That's a good point
>>96472669
Sorry, I'm talking about the 2020 Second Season Edition box and the 2025 Third Season Edition box
I will most likely mainly play at my LGS. I'm not sure whether or not yet I can get my friends to come along

Anyone have any recent additions to your warcry / mordheim terrain you'd like to share? I have all of the branded Warcry terrain I could care for but I was wondering do you think the Fortified Manor the Empire could be converted into something playable or would I be better off buying some generic scatter terrain like hills and rock formations?

>>96472855
>I will most likely mainly play at my LGS.
Shouldn't matter if you can get friends in on it then, you'll find interested players.
HGell I would take a couple teams and a small pitch to cafes, set up and then just read a book until some random expressed interest in the miniatures, I've got a few people into playing that way.

>>96473152
manor was nice sight blocking terrain, and you can have some model garrison on top of the watch tower, but it's kinda small for AoS-scale, it's also completely flat with no detail inside.

>>96473168
Yeah like I said it's the easiest route to go down, and it does seem like in the past few years aos has focused on updating whfb leftover races, and (slightly) tweaking them to avoid overlap. Aggradon lancers instead of saurus knights, barrow guard instead of grave guard, that sort of thing. (Though tbf in some cases like skaven and chaos they were more 1 to 1 straight updates). It's very much the expected route for the game to go, which is why it's strange that the rumourmongers haven't really said anything of the sort.
>>96473240
Yeah that's also an option. Them looking to push out new factions (cathay, kislev, coast, ...) where people don't really have pre existing armies, or third party stuff.

>>96473485
>or third party stuff.
Except for historicals in the case of Kislev at least

>>96473503
I don't think you'll find many bear riding bearguard (with bear weapons) among historicals anon

>>96456135
Holy TWW secondary cope, batman!

>>96456135
That's just a scaled-down version of the 8th edition Treeman...
>complaint about AoS designs
>look inside
>actually complaining about late Fantasy designs

>>96466253
>useful crafts
Masonry, structural carpentry. Build a reasonable house or a Manse. (To the sorcerer specifications)
Shipwright. Build and sell ships.

>>96470863
But by 2e population numbers Solars made up 0.01% of the total Exalt numbers. Among the Exalted, the DBs were the masses.

Even in real life the masses aren't as powerful as they are in Exalted.

>>96473243
If, say, Vladimir Putin was usurped by the rest of Russia's political and economic elite, would you say that he was overthrown in an uprising of the masses? You're playing pretty silly semantic games here, anon.

>>96473364
This conversation reminds me of 1984

>>96473468
Entropist

File: African Warlord CYOA.png (5.45 MB, 1200x7000)

5.45 MB PNG

>>96473468

File: warlord of fanksia pg1.png (663 KB, 1197x3098)

663 KB PNG

>>96473468

File: warlord of fanksia pg2.png (1.24 MB, 1196x4704)

1.24 MB PNG

>>96473554

File: warlord of fanksia pg3.png (737 KB, 1199x2935)

737 KB PNG

>>96473561

>>96472959
>t. is too dumb to do achievements
stop projecting your iq

File: stop-posting-about-sprunk(...).png (101 KB, 500x500)

101 KB PNG

>brawl
>opponent is playing Vivi
>if I kill it they scoop
>if I can't I'm in for a round of solitaire

>brawl

That is the name of the shit format I play, yes

btw there's no way to change cardnames unless the tranny proves it and posts a tutorial for analysis

>>96463236
the only problem is the lack of writer restraint
every setting has gobs of leveled adventurers/heroes with at least semi-optimized builds and party compositions, most of the time they have really high ability scores, and of course plot armor

I don't think you should be limited to E6, but I try to stay in that mindset.
https://thealexandrian.net/wordpress/587/roleplaying-games/dd-calibrating-your-expectations-2

File: heresy_by_saintfallen_djx(...).jpg (87 KB, 827x1266)

87 KB JPG

Remember to keep on page 10 bumping and I'll see you bumpfag thread.

>>96468945
That’s supposed to be a dragon? I thought that Christianity views dragons as a symbol of the Devil? There’s a reason there’s tales of sacred knights killing then, after all.

>>96471773
The highest order of angels, the Seraphim, might be dragons. They are described to have many pairs of wings and their name translates to "serpentine ones".

>>96472665
reptilians confirmed

>>96470252
>"Im not sure about it. I was expecting other thing. It feels like it needs something else."
He should try not playing d+d

>>96469800
I've run a mix of voice and text oneshots, and currently running a text campaign. I'm enjoying it way more than being stuck in eternal 5e hell, and it's going to be a handy tool to get people to step outside of 5e because if they weren't going to do it of their own accord they're highly likely the type that, even if they're not CR fans, they know the name and would try it because of it. It's not as big a shake up to the expected D&D as they tried to make it seem like before release and whatever, fine.

The books consistently harps on about players having to be awake and proactive and contribute to the game instead of having the DM do 99% of it. The physical cards are nice for when I run tables for teens and kid in OOSH, I already make my own cards for them but the core set came with one already. The main hurdle I'm coming across is people always trying to find a mechanical outcome for a thing instead of playing for the story, this also happens when I take an action as a monster and only make narrative/environmental changes instead of rolling to attack a PC, it's been fun working on that and seeing things click into place for new players.

tl;dr more flexible than 5e and faster to run, shame CR shot it in the head and went back to 5e lol

>>96469800
Critical Role won't even play it. They're playing DND instead. Isn't that embarrassing?

File: 069bb9e377168f4fabd11f7ec(...).jpg (7.78 MB, 6428x2834)

7.78 MB JPG

For context, I have played Dungeon World, GMed Homebrew World (with the follower rules from Infinite Dungeons), played and GMed Fellowship 1e, played and GMed Fellowship 2e, and GMed Chasing Adventure.

I GMed the Daggerheart quickstart for three players (and went a little further with a bonus encounter against the colossus Ikeri, a spellblade leader, and an Abandoned Grove environment, during which Ikeri was one-turn-killed: https://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/95975566/#95994135 ).

I wrote up an actual play report, during which I concluded that Daggerheart just is not for me, even relative to other PbtA games.

I am still fairly invested in the game. I like the playtest material that they have available:
https://www.daggerheart.com/thevoid/

And I am eager to see what Keith Baker will be writing for Daggerheart:
https://darringtonpress.com/gencon2025-announcements/
>New Daggerheart World by Creators of Eberron and More: Finally, we have Keith Baker and Jenn Ellis’s new world in Daggerheart! From the minds of fan-favorite RPG worlds like Eberron and innovative tabletop games like Phoenix Dawn Command, Illimat, and the Adventure Zone Storytelling Game, Twogether Studio’s Keith Baker and Jenn Ellis are partnering with us to make their next grand world using Daggerheart. Expect thrilling worldbuilding and brilliant new player option designs from this powerhouse team.

Oh, and I also homebrewed this modern-day demigod campaign frame:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Vw4-EKpOZJ9rIxjGvy_h7yCY4pEao-gBY-3rLMdkvzE/edit

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

It's very fun

>>96470597
>There are rules in the RT Rulebook for stat-fiddling infantry, and making your own vehicles, so it's certainly possible to make rules for later factions
true at minimum would just need to create baseline stat lines for Tau and Necrons(Dark Eldar one could probably get away with just using the existing RT Eldar statlines, much like if you were to do Votann you'd probably just use Squat stats)

>though they may lack the special faction rules that later editions loved to hand out
also true though I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to backport some of those as needed

>You'd have to decide if you wanted your Necrons to act like robots/vehicles or conventional units though.
yet another thing to sort out, though I could see them being a mix of both(much like how core RT Tyranids make use of the regular equipment and vehicle rules just fluffed to fit their biotech niche)

File: youhavenoidea.jpg (1.36 MB, 2407x2262)

1.36 MB JPG

>>96470648
>core RT Tyranids make use of the regular equipment and vehicle rules just fluffed to fit their biotech niche

This varies, depending on whether you use the Vehicle Manual rules or not (and the only Nid 'Vehicle' they ever released a datafax for was the Screamer Killer Carnifex). The Tryanids list (In White Dwarf 145) actually had a monster stat-line for them instead, so you can happily live without the vehicle layout plans and Perspex targeting matrix, if you want to.

The only lists really stuck with the Vehicle Manual rules are the later Ork ones, the Space Wolves list and... the Knornate Ravagers (because of the Wheelchair of doom). And, even then, I don't think robots ever got a targeting card (weird, considering that a Nid unit did).

>>96470597
It wouldn't be hard to make statlines for anything with RT's core book.

One of these days I'd like to tackle a RT Battle Bible, so all the scattered rules are in one spot. Though you end up with oddities like the original vehicle rules being superseded with stuff released in WD. Honestly you almost have two different games with RT, corebook only RT which is fairly self contained and RT+ where all the WD material gets added in.

>>96470048
I play in a large campaign and it really doesn't seem to matter, a lot of people use modern minis on bigger circles, some 25mm circles and some squares. I personally use my WHFB army so i use 20mm and 25mm squares for normal stuff and 40mm for monster.

File: F2ZG1xSWIAAFOQi.png (154 KB, 536x664)

154 KB PNG

>>96473508
Meant for >>96468834
my bad

The Centaur was a Thicc Bro

>>96468583
Chadwarden

Hello page 10, old friend