>>2774221 Can't Spell Fundoshi without the word 'Fun'!
50, very fast, hard .The future of Fg is cumming soon.
100, slow, tight
69, fast, medium
post 'moko (or other Watamote girls if you want)
Sachi
>>2959703
>>3026226stinky
>>3026229
>>3026229Nah, you are.
Hiro said long ago that each board may have 1 thread to talk about board issues. I think this is the time /e/ needs one.I do not mind AI generated art. AI is a tool for generating art like a pen or paintbrush. In the right hands it can make great art. The problem we have right now is that people are posting AI generated art outside the AI threads. We need to steer these people to post on the AI thread instead. There anons can explain how AI art generations works, provide resources and feedback and explain things like different checkpoints, what LORAs do for your image, how to inpaint errors, upscaling, masking, sampling steps, CFG, all of that stuff. Instead, people are posting base gens from Grok or whatever of Lum>>3021074>>3021522>>3021820And they may not be aware that their AI gens are 1. Obviously AI. 2 Of low quality.We should not allow the posting of AI generated art outside the AI threads, not because we're trying to be gatekeepers, but because the AI threads are the best places where those images can be posted, to receive feedback and improve the quality of the entire board.You're free to disagree but I think we need to discuss this.
>>3024519What happens then is "don't ask don't tell" half the issue is whenever someone posts a generated image they say something along the lines of...>I generated this in reaction to this topicAnd instantly the thread is derailed with the AI debate yet again. Like when the ponies were quarantined Anons want containment so that they can post about ENF or pantyhose not Grok and MLP. So as long as it passes as human and they don't expose themselves then then it doesn't derail the thread, and its not anyone's business if its real or not (it may still be some's business if you're posting a bunch of technically competent pieces with really simple and uninspired poses and compositions as AI is oft to do, but that's an issue that we would all still be fighting about even without AI and so it falls outside of the scope of this topic)
>>3024176yes, we don't like AI outputs being lazily dumped everywherehow hard is it to understand thati know we're on 4chan but come on this shouldn't be complex
>>3025483Yeah its like when Kisekae or MMD first became a thing or any other app or game that makes posing up sexy models easy and accessible. Our standards go up to exclude anything that isn't difficult and novel to create, and enthusiasts for the spam making apps get relegated to thier own threads or boards. Its how this shit has always worked, AI doesn't get special treatment.
Since the sudden apparition of AI, so advanced and intelligent, taking everybody by surprise, impressed and amazed by all the things AI was capable to do, and the following world-wide massive explosion of popularity and spreading of it, not to mention it kept and keeps getting more and more advanced at a fast rate, it can be used with relative ease and speed. Doesn't take an expert. As a result, just about any idiot with some basic learning before starting, can already make AI generated images/videos/whatever (that range from very poor quality , to just mediocre), and feeling like they are somewhat artists. Sum up to them all the AI enthusiasts which works are generally decent because they think it's an awesome and much more practical way of creating art ("art"), producing high quantities of yet just more and more "slop".And there you have, the reason. The consequent enormous, invasive flooding of AI-generated anime everywhere now.Some people argue that AI simply cannot create art and will never do. No matter now or how advanced it will be in the future.Personally I agree with them. Be it a beautiful landscape or anime image. Created by/with AI. By a skillful individual with very advanced knowledgeable about the tools to generate, editing, and refining exceptionally well. It still just feels like... it lacks something. Like something looks "off".Lately, I started using a couple of the best free websites that detect with very trustworthy accuracy if an image, just as interesting as the main utility itself (telling you if it's fake or real, AI-generated or Human-made), is it tells you all the reasons of the "Why" of the result the analysis concluded. Characteristics of a fake image and a man-made real image or photo taken by a camera. And expanded information displayed on each.Here, have a refreshing real pic of Momo in her sexy underwear.
To be clear to AI fags - and assuming most anti-AI fags agree with me - the problem is less AI itself and more that AI has consistent errors and style. Even when a AI-generated picture seems appropriate for a non-AI thread, careful enough examination will generally lead to discovering the same mistakes and monotony. Note that this criticism could theoretically be made towards any artist that would consistently make the same mistakes and flood the board with their art. If it gets better one day, no problem, but that's not the case now, so pointing at it does make sense.I'd be tempted to say you could post good AI on any board if it can't be recognized as such because of its errors or monotonous style (and in practice, if it really can't be recognized as AI, no ruling can apply to it), but I think at this point, many AI-fags are used to its traits and don't notice them - while others still do, so we have more than one sensibility with which we can judge whether its AI or not. Combine this with some AI-fags flooding some threads and you get to a point where others just dejectedly renounce calling individual cases out - but that doesn't mean they're fine with it, hence this thread.
It's Jill-off January again, post some girls getting off.No AI.
>>3008186ikr
There are so many incredible girls in this anime.
SFW, but extremely erotic.
You guys know that i can generate it myself right?
>>3026647You might be able to, but not everyone has a GPU.
>>3016928she sure is
>>3026304>>3026306that's from fire emblem, stupid
Breast envy
I just want to share my favorite wolf.
>>2843930
>>3012988whoever shopped the breasts must've had really bad color calibration on their monitor...
>>2996433Nice!!! Glad to see other people also commissioning art of her.Quite a few of the commissions I have gotten of her have already posted, but here's another.
Wonderful! It's May 30!>Happy Birthday, Doppel-chan!Let's celebrate this day by posting some /c/pics of Best Girl from Monster Musume no Iru Nichijou.
The girls of ZnT, especially Louise. Other kugyuus are fine too.
Francesca doesn't really need a bra
https://exhentai.org/g/3650365/b8e3bea323/
>>3025782I've been waiting for this, thanks for sharing!Would post an image but thanks for the Cloudflare bullshit I get blocked many times...
>>3025782Mio looks great.
>>3026134she has big enough bush to hide the censor bar
Itty Bitty Titty Committee - Second EditionKeep the flat, small, and medium coming.
>>3020865This pic has single handedly convinced. I'm finally gonna watch this stupid normie anime everyone has been trying to violently cram down my throat.
>>2915111
>>3021551So, was it worth watching?
>>3021551Instead of sucking all that dick everyone violently crams down your throat?Good trade off.
Girls in the middle of undressing or dressing up.
>>2980568Oh yeah you should check out the rest of it
Old thread:>>3000024This can include officially released art, character sheets, concept art, and art from official creators/assistants/animators from shows or manga (from their Fanbox, for example).No AI or third-party edits/nude filters, please. Avoid posting manga pages unless the nudity is uncommon (like an uncensored tankobun or international release).
Damn, I did not know there was already a thread since it had no subject. Should we just move there? I can't delete this thread.
>>3025970/e/ moves very slowly. Both threads will likely be up when one of them falls off the board.
>>3025970we should use this one since the other OP was a dumbass
>>3025995The other thread is already more active and was made first. It feels more right to use the other thread despite the lack of a subject.
