He had a faustian spirit
Shitty upbringing
>>18012357The human race, according to his memoir.
>"Good job, Jeanne! You did everything I asked of you perfectly! This war that has killed hundreds and hundred will end shortly!">"Unfortunately, you are a woman, and you went against what I already established for your gender to do, which is to cook meals and have children, not to go into war and shit. Less Liliths, more Eves, you know what I'm saying?">"Oh, and you also killed worshippers of mine in this stupid war that you and your kin made with your sinful free will! Tsk, tsk!>"And for those grievous actions against me, and my people, you will be accused as a heretic and rightfully burned at the stake! Don't worry, however, you will be highly respected by the same people that will burn you up in the nearby future, so cheer up!"
>>18012831Got it man, you think the only idea possible to have is atheism. Good to know attempting to engage you on any matter of substance is futile.
>>18012840Again, learn to read because you're making a strawman of what I say all the time. And atheism has nothing to do with anything in my post.
>>18012847Idea (noun) 1. a thought or suggestion as to a possible course of action."the idea of linking pay to performance has caught on"2. the aim or purpose."I took a job with the idea of getting some money together">Noooooo you can't quote the Oxford dictionary for to contradict my hyper autistic definition of a word that only exists in my headYou are literally reeeeing about God a few posts up. Atheism has everything to do with it.
>>18012863Nice philosophy degree you got there4 a: a plan for action : designb: a standard of perfection : idealc: a transcendent entity that is a real pattern of which existing things are imperfect representations5a: an entity (such as a thought, concept, sensation, or image) actually or potentially present to consciousnessb: an indefinite or unformed conceptionc obsolete : an image recalled by memoryarchaic : a visible representation of a conception : a replica of a patternDid you lie about your philosophy degree? Did you get it because you're a token diversity student?Or are philosophy degree just beyond worthless?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18012882Whatever dude, go on raging against something you claim you believe doesn't exist. Upsetting yourself for no reason about the Christian God because you have nothing better in your materialist life I guess? Probably it being Sunday reminds you of your parents dragging your teenage ass to church lmao.
>Seneca you are a colossal faggot, kys unironicallyHow do you respond?
Why's he stereotyped as a redhead when the only mention we have of his hair color describes him as blonde-ish
>>18011938His family's cognomen was Ahenobarbus, what means Bronzebeard.
>>18011893>Your wife is a dude.
>>18012648Copperbeard>>18012762>still believing in Suetonius' nonsense>in 2025 ngmi
>>18012891>simping for Nerowhy?
But was he a good general?
>>18011257I believe it was the French that called him this way.>>18011296West here is meant as the Western Hemisphere.
Isn't Bolivar the South American Napoleon? Wasn't Santa Anna famously dogshit?
>>18012111This, I remembered the nickname being attributed to Bolivar, but it seems I was wrong.
>>18011703Absolutely seething lmao
>>18010739He is one of the reasons why Mexico is a shithole.
Why are women so fierce in the competition of sex?
Its called evolution, dunno if you've heard about it. Something about selective pressure, survival of the fittest and passing on the best genes. But considering your intellect youre just an evolutionary impasse and you're genes will be wiped out as soon as we face the next wave of selective pressure, so dont you worry about it, dude!
I think men really underestimate the internal competition females have since men tend to stick to themselves and do their thing. Femoids literally have systems where they delegate men to one another based on whatever their sense of fairness is
>>18012838>I think men really underestimate the internal competitionTell me more
>be mussolini>hate hitler>allied with france and britain so you can contain hitler>suddenly start acting like an imbecile on the world stage trying to recreate the roman empire (starting with Ethiopia, for some reason)>the Ethiopian emperor was good mates with the west so now everyone is pissed off at you>you still hate hitler btw so germany is sending arms to ethiopia to slow you down lol>you now have a useless rump kingdom in africa that you won't even be able to defend from britain and france (who now hate you)>say screw it, you don't need britain and france>start trying to contain hitler entirely on your own>epic fail.jpg>anschluss happens anyway despite your threats of war and you do nothing about it>france and britain still hate you>even hitler still hates you>but everyone hates hitler>and everyone hates youComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
Joining Hitler was his mistake. He should have joined the allies.Ofc no spoils of victory but he would have saved fascism as a legitimate political doctrine not associated with nazism.
>>18012101>if mussolini would have joined the jews, jews would not browbeat my faggot ass for being a homosexual who likes fascist aestethics like an oiled up homoOk homo.
>>18012101How good are the Italians at defending mountain passes?Seems the best option was not to fight at all like Spain and Portugal. Then, at least, his regime could have had another few years left in them.
>>18011771D'Annunzio was the man Mussolini should have been. if he was still alive and in charge of Italy fascism would still exist as a political force and millions of people wouldn't have died. He also achieved the corporate state in Fiume whilst Mussolini spent most of his time as duce just re-doing Russia's NEP but to a worse and less resilient effect
Every time he tried something ambitious, Mussolini needed Hitler to bail him out: Greece, North Africa, etc. Made him a puppet of the very dictator he once distrusted.
white people don't need religion to have morality but brown people do
We don't need any discussion about religion on /his/
>>18012807Looking at white societies right now, I'm not sure about that.Only meds are lifemaxxed enough to be able to function without a tyrannical religious entity
>>18012807meanwhile white people who even with religion went on mass murdering half of the planet lmao
>>18012850unironically laughed
I know this not because I have a higher IQ (mine's only 150) but because I've done psychedelics and I'm very confident he hasn't. He rationally argues that reality has to be self-referential, self-consistent, and self-defining. This means reality has a nature of some kind, and we just have to figure out what that thing is which fits neatly into this category. Langan notices then, that, as far as he can tell, all real and imagined things are isomorphic to a definition (they map onto each other). So he looks at this and says the self-referential/consistent/defining thing which reality is is actually a language, since it can fit in there. However he's wrong that all real or imagined things are isomorphic to a definition. Anyone who has done psychedelics has seen firsthand the ineffable. INEFFABLE. What you are witnessing DOES NOT MAP ON TO A DEFINITION. Langan can't comprehend this because he hasn't lost his metaphysical virginity yet and taken the red pill of drugs. In fact when one sees this ineffable mystical state one realizes it IS reality laid bare, like the Buddhists say. So if the nature of reality is beyond language, how can the nature of reality BE language like he says? This means he also hasn't proven the existence of god, the soul, and, MOST IMPORTANTLY, HELL. Obviously those things could still exist, but his theory is trash. Oh and he thinks unconditional love is impossible so tell your mom she doesn't actually love you the way she thinks she does because the smart man said so.
>>18011562I'm not playing any word game. IQ is for individuals, the concept doesn't even apply to computer intelligence. It's just good fun to estimate the IQ it would have if it were an individual. Your own posts are more than a little confusing in that regard. You disagree with CL's conclusions but not the premise of the CTMU or his personal philosopher-kingship. That's strange to me. Most people who disagree with his ideas also dispute his claim to record setting IQ.
Neither approach fully proves metaphysical claims like Hell; they just offer different ways of engaging with reality.
He's a retarded Christcuck
>>18011590I have to challenge his IQ to prove he's wrong? How about I just prove he's wrong? That's sufficient...wtf. Just because he's smart doesn't mean he knows ultimate truth. He just assumes this is the case. Reread my criticism of his theory. The existence of the ineffable precludes reality being a language at the most fundamental level.
>>18012781Nobody reads his work because there are too many red flags from the moment you hear about him. You must be the man himself or a jeet who sells his book on amazon or some shit.
You're a general in charge of an allied army on the western front in 1916. You have the knowledge of today but are still limited by the technology of the time. How do you break through?
>>18012173but there was 3x more Jews fighting on German side than on French one
>>18012187Bad enough.
>>18009678I'd probably just reinforce and hold the front and focus more on intelligence gathering and analysis, if possible, and try group attacks away from the front line, such as on logistics, reducing supplies to their front line. I don't know, trench warfare is fucking moronic.
>>18009678Order more planes, more tanks, and more artillery. Focus them on the weakest salient, set up a shitload of reinforcing troops along the wings, then shove them forwards, shelling the fuck out of any surrounding areas to disrupt reinforcements.
>>18011560Surrendering unconditionally can destroy legitimacy and independence. Throwback to France in 1940 vs. Yugoslavia in 1991: outright collapse often leads to occupation and puppet governments.
Calling yourself Indo-European is the equivalent of this guy calling himself American.
>>18012336TRVKEOnly Europeans may claim Indo-European heritage.Iranijeets are larpers.
>>18012336There is no American ethnicity.
>>18012336I call myself Anatolian Neolithic Farmer.The true founders of civilization.
>>18012336who cares about all that garbage jesus christ get a lifehe fine af tho
Were the Soviet generals better than their german (or even american) counterparts by the end of the war?
>>18012580Russian>german>americanSomething like that
>>18012580Vermin.
>>18012689Don't know why people shit on US generals so much when they pretty much did everything everything right.Their main concern was always to avoid casualties, and they were far better at managing logistics and combined arms for overwhelming firepower.
Realistically, what's more realistic than Christianity?
>>18012359The kind of atheistic religiosity guys like Peterson and Zizek spread, i.e. Christianity is the accumulation of millennia of human wisdom and experience, but it's told in ways that no Rational(tm) mind can accept, therefore we are at this deadlock where we threw the baby out with the bathwater and don't know how to reconcile it because it takes irrationality to accept the cosmic truth and act accordingly - faith if you will.
>>18012363Hmm.. but what's more realistic than Christianity?
Any ideology where it's claims at least operate entirely within an observable human experience.
>>18012770What's that?
>Hitler's right hand>named HimmlerWho fucking wrote this crap?
>>18010257Martin Luther Kang
>>18010271He knew them from is innerst voices
>>18012131Nah. He want that stupid. The fact that they try to pretend he was means they're lying about something
>>18010093>>18010320>>18011062lmfaoaoaoaoaoaoao
The right-hand metaphor is kind of misleading. Sure, Himmler was powerful, but operationally different from, say, Keitel.
Why is there so much opossition to "great man theory"? The majority of history has been objectevly moved by great men not social movements
>>18011998[1] according to sources close to Alexander
>It's another "human history = warfare" thread
>>18012823Great men theory applies to more then just warfareLike science art or philosophy
>>18010486Because modern "historians" are just leftist academics who chose the pathetic life choice of being a professional student. Their deep resentment towards successful people who chose a real job is evident which is why they dedicate their lives to "deconstructing" powerful proud men who make them feel inferior.Schumpeter diagnosed this trend among academics back in the 40s.
>>18010536shitskin OP BTFO
Cook fired a warning shot, then shot one of the Hawaiians dead. Cook and four marines were killed. After reading history, how do anglos think they are still popular and liked? Do their schools teach them only the good stuff?
>>18012042At least look at Hawaii's flag before shitposting, Rajesh
>>18012042What are you trying to prove here? All I read from this was Cook had balls of fucking steel. He warned them, no? Gentleman to the end.
>>18012042I know this OP is a troll post and/or sperg (as is anyone who uses Anglo unironically) but to answer this seriously;>Do their schools teach them only the good stuff?Schools basically don’t really teach much imperial history at all good or bad. I wouldn’t even say it’s so much censorship or white washing since in my experience of state schools they still fit in plenty of general whitey bad stuff into the curriculum - especially slavery and at least in my school US civil rights stuff was thrown in there. History just covers some basic overview of Romans, Anglo-Saxons, vikings etc in primary school followed by Tudors, civil war and then a time skip to Victorians (only really focusing on industry is le bad) followed by WW1 and WW2 with the latter mostly being the holocaust. I honestly think they just can’t be bothered to fit in how and why the empire developed, how it was run, how it ended, its positive and negative influences on events etc. For the most part history is just badly organised and most students find it very disengaging, hence why English people have a reputation amongst grievance-obsessed Celtic nationalists for not caring about it since it’s mostly just a boring subject in school to our normies.
