Was he broken or pure evil?
>>18765422Being the first and only politician to be honest and actually do what he said he would in his campaign still makes him more moral than every other politician
>>18763766pure good
>>18763766He was a sensitive young man
>>18763766He was probably more slavic and celtic than germanic
>>18765287I grew up loving Hitler but yeah like you said he's like Stalin and other evil Tyrants that we don't want to live under...even the Nazis on here. Having to say Heil Hitler all the time and having the Gestapo on your ass if you're not a loyal slave...total war all the time....the dude is like the complete opposite of what is good in being a human
After watching this, I am now fully convinced John Gotti was the last true Cosa Nostra. Not that he followed Cosa Nostra to the letter of the law, but the spirit of the law, which is a key difference>kills Ralph Galione (made guy) for fucking up the Jimmy McBratney hit and got away with it from the boss. after the killing he said he would defend his crew and accept being killed for it.>strict no drug policy, but also didn't kill his entire crew when he found out they were dealing drugs because of the cash situation>staged a coup d'état and murdered Paul Castellano in the middle of Midtown Manhattan and literally nobody involved got sent to jail>after Paul's death, cut off co-working with other families and became the most powerful mob family in the city>didn't plaster himself out for everyone to see, lived in a average middle class neighborhood (unlike Castellano), but didn't hide from the cameras neither like a rat>went to jail, but never rated anyone out
>>18768748>strict no drug policykek, the 'truke' is the mafia just got bodied out of the drug trade by nogs and spics
>>18768753>kek, the 'truke' is the mafia just got bodied out of the drug trade by nogs and spicsNo shit, that was the point of the film. They were hypocrites. But they literally couldn't make a living without it. I'm saying John didn't personally, but he couldn't clip his whole crew he knew since childhood over it.
Peterson argues that Myth came before morality and was used to derive propositional truths. On the evidence I've seen I think he is probably correct however I don't think it's relevant today. Myth is important because it can improve a person's life through a variety of mechanisms but in today's age the Myth first to morality second pipeline won't work. I can't take anyone who is literate and has grown up with common technology and give them a story, however beautiful and expect them to derive morality from it alone. As soon as they express to someone their reason for that particular perspective they will have it knocked down as a fiction, if they don't knock it down themselves first internally. I would argue that Myth has been used to justify harm in vastly more cases than it has been used to justify good.Am I wrong to think this? Can Myth > Morality still work today. Or must we abandon it and now accept Truth > Morality > Myth. Myth itself does not have to be abandoned it requires truth first.
>>18766845>>18766885His spiral into what seemed to hit its bottom during the 20 v 1 reminds me of Richard Dawkins. It may have been 10 years ago now he was doing a lot of open question panels and became bitter from it. He would be red in the face in frustration while responding to shallow critiques. The way a person presents themselves in slop debates is of no relevance to their argument, perspective or their literature. I am neutral of as I am with Dawkins I engage in the idea not the person. I would never do the slop debate circuit it clearly damaged Dawkins and Peterson. It appeals to the lowest common cattle that won't read a book so they get their perspectives from that shit.
>>18767111If you haven't read Maps of Meaning you don't know Peterson. Like I said here >>18767180 you seem to be watching the slop.Do you think that Nietzsche would have articulated himself well in slop debates? No. And we should be thankful that what we know of him comes from his books.
>>18767180>His spiral into what seemed to hit its bottom during the 20 v 1 reminds me of Richard Dawkins. It may have been 10 years ago now he was doing a lot of open question panels and became bitter from it. He would be red in the face in frustration while responding to shallow critiques. The way a person presents themselves in slop debates is of no relevance to their argument, perspective or their literature. I am neutral of as I am with Dawkins I engage in the idea not the person.Jordon and Dawkins issues is that they can't recognize when they shouldn't take critique seriously. There could've been a graceful way for someone like him to handle the 20 v 1 debacle, the first step would've been recognizing just how insane the debate format was in the first place, but he's too far up his own ass. People like Jordon aren't stupid but they also aren't as smart as they think they are. A smarter man would've recognized when they were being gish-galloped instead of panicking and resorting to splitting hairs over definitions. It's really painful to watch honestly
>>18766666Not really.Most myths are just stories. The idea that they are just bad documentaries is just inaccurate.Where is the etiology in Harbardsljod?
>>18767183>Jordon and Dawkins issues is that they can't recognize when they shouldn't take critique seriously.But that is what makes them who they are. Dawkins wouldn't have produced what he produced had he not been like that. Although I separate character and especially character before an audience from works, the character is why the works became works.>There could've been a graceful way for someone like him to handle the 20 v 1 I entirely agree.>the first step would've been recognizing just how insane the debate format was in the first place, but he's too far up his own ass.I agree with the first part however again, had he been able to recognise that he would never have produced the works he has produced. The second part is speculative and reductionist. We don't know why he reacted that way.My point about resurrecting Nietzsche, Kafka, Spinoza and so on and putting them in front of an audience on camera stands. Spinoza may have just walked out and looked worse for it, Nietzsche may have become a mess. None of them could have conveyed the complexities of their ideas in any audience preforming theatre and the point is that is what made them so definitive in their works.
E-Christians who defend the slaughter of Saxon pagans are ‘tards. Even the Catholic Church at the time condemned the massacres because you can’t baptize the dead.
>>18768223Charlemagne himself was a Frank, a subcategory of the Germanic peoples
>>18768227Yeah that's goyman cope. The "germans" of today are not the Germanic peoples of yesterday.
>>18768213>It does not mean God endorses them or the perpetratorsIf he doesn't endorse it then why doesn't he stop them from committing crimes & atrocities in his name? Never once stayed the hand of someone abusing the innocent, when the abuser was "acting in the name of god". He who is silent consents. It's complicity at the very least and it's a reflection of an evil nature
>>18768641Can you make a better universe?
>>18768210They defend it for the wrong reasons. Charlemagne had every right to put them down since they were uncultured troublemaking swine. Whatever the faggot in the Vatican had to say about it doesn't matter.
When will christcucks admit they are worshipping a jew who was only preaching to fellow jews?Saul essentially invented most of what we today call christianity. Seriously are christcucks conscious?
>>18768637>wewuzz Benjamites o agloPathetic
>>18768633>>18768636>>18768650>>18766582
>>18768653The Late Roman Saint said it so it must be true.
>>18768664he wasn't the only one
>>18768671Der jude really is ewige.
Who fell off harder
Britain did. Rome transitioned into Byzantine as Constantinople was where Rome's center of population and economy were anyways. Plus the fact that Rome barely had any control over their European frontier anyways so it was less of a loss for them
>>18768111Funny how they both collapsed after picking fights with Germany
>>18768111SOmeone told me I fell offOOOOH I needed thatNigger nigger nigger nigger, catchem body like that, rap a nigger all day cus I'm nigger like that they knowDem know dem know dem know
>>18768111Romejeets fell over, sharted, and died. Shartalians and Gayreeks gloat about Persians meeting the same fate, but I would say Romans died in a more humiliating fashion. Italy became a collection of museum artifacts that street shitting savages went to war over for thousands of years. Spain became an incubation zone between Vandal, Viking, and Celt women, and black men.The English are subhuman pussies but the world has had to speak their language to parlay. An argument can be made that we're still living in "their era" for the time being
>>18768111Britain, because of how rapid the collapse was. Rome though was a bigger fall off if you drag it out to the last century of its existence as essentially a city state in thrace.
States have rights to everything, including, nuclear weaponsProve me wrong, pro-tip, you can't.. Without looking like an imperial tyrant.And nobody wants to be the bad guy, huh? Forcing other people to the way you want them to live? It's the same story all over again. Time and time again.
>>18768678>Prove me wrongSure, your rights only go as far as you're able to enforce them. If Arkansas tried to get a nuke the feds would use all their power, up to and including military, to make that happen.>No, they wouldn't!But they could.
What the title says, all humans are Jewish in God's eyes. Share this with as many people as possible and read the scripture.
paul is not even a prophet in christianity yet your entire theology is based on his writings>buh he saw Jesuswhy should you believe him in the first place if hes not a prophet??
>>18768661Nothing to do with Paul? just a random persons analysis of things that's all (lol im so randumzzz)
>>18768681when did Jesus preach the stuff in picrel??
Oops, sorry about that!
>>18768490Lutheranism is also the superior version of Christianity:- has the best music- has the most reasonable and well-adjusted theology- sarcastic anti-semitism- doesn't cuck to some faggot in rome.- it even works on Africans. (see Namibia)
>>18768531Mogzart mogs Lutheran music
>>18768564bait used to be believable.
>>18768531Based. If only if Lutheranism adopted Holy Orders, stopped its aversion to monastic orders, and started seriously adopting mystical practices like lectio divina and hesychasm earlier. But Lutheran theologians are embracing the latter, while Holy orders and monasticism are on the rise right now. I have high hopes that Lutherans and Anglicans can further continue their full communion with each other and the Old Catholics, Moravians, and Methodists as well as any Reformed who aren’t too stuck up. Ecumenism is really needed if Christianity is to survive, and Lutherans appear to extend the olive branch more than any other denom.
>>18768564Hi Ranjesh
Welcome to Vedic Studies General! In this general we discuss the history/philosophy/religion of the Vedic Tradition.>What is 'Vedic' anyways?Vedic means relating to the Vedas, the ancient sacred texts of India, and or to the historical period and culture associated with them.The Vedic period in India lasting from c. 1500 BCE to c. 500 BCE>Where do I start with my Vedic studies?Start with the Foundational Texts!>Bhagavad Gita (and consequently the Mahabharata)https://ebooks.tirumala.org/downloads/The%20Bhagavad%20Gita.pdfhttps://ia601804.us.archive.org/17/items/the-mahabharata-set-of-10-volumes/The%20Mahabharata%20Set%20of%2010%20Volumes.pdf>Upanishadshttps://dn760105.eu.archive.org/0/items/upanishads01ml/upanishads01ml.pdf>Tattva Bodhahttps://namarupa.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Tattva-Bodha-1997.pdf
>>18768398You are right, the reason why i called it Vedic general and not Hindu general is because i wanted to open up discussion relating to history too
>>18768413>written by AI but rewritten by a human>using an AI programnice try.Besides, I’ve already tried these tests, and they are highly contradictory; I got varied results depending on which device I used and what kind of language I employed. Tip: I used AI to write this post—I asked it to summarize things over and over again. Look at the result, lol
>>18768445>Generative ai ≠ Discriminative ai
>>18768448You do realize that these tools for deducing whether something was written by AI are highly subjective and depend on many factors, right? As I mentioned, sometimes even the language you use can cause a text to be flagged as AI-generated. I usually run my English posts through Google Translate since my native language is French to check or correct them; this often results in some odd word choices that these tools then label as AI-written. That’s exactly what happened with the names of Vedic deities and the term used for the sacrificial ritual. I’ve tested this with German and French as well, and the same thing happens. please, try again saar
jeet thread dni
>Ancient Near Eastern civilizations go back to the NeolithicWhat the fuck
>>18766834We can only gues what the swastika meant 10k years ago, but 5k years ago it was a solar symbol, maybe also a ferility or happiness symbol. The swastika likely did not have the specific connection to warfare back then.
>>18766834its just a cool symbol
>>18766827>Ancient Near Eastern civilizations go back to the NeolithicThis is just categorically false, though. The rise of Near Eastern civilization around 4000BC is, by definition, past when the Neolithic ends, because the rise of such civilizations is what marks the end of the Neolithic. What should really surprise you is that the earliest civilizations in the Americas are almost as old, to around ~3000BC, though there's some debate about if those sites constitute "civilization" and are truly urban residential sites or if they're more like Göbekli Tepe and are more visited for specific ceremonies by neighboring communites than lived in year-round
>>18766827The Hitler/Einstein/Black Hebrew haplogroup
>>18766834It doesn't really mean anything. Even non whites like Tibetans and Georgians tattooed it all over their skin like dirty animals.>>18768657Das rite.. Bow to this civilization making BBC right quick before I send this mother fucker through another DARK age... Cuck ass Nikkuh...
Where does "culture" come from?
>>18761921Classic western cultural wasteland is a coffee in the morning with some smokes, maybe some bacon and eggs. Makes for a very productive society, getting stupid things done faster.At the end of the day alcohol is the preferred intoxicant, wife beatings without alcohol is like a circus without lions.Throw in a chocolate Jesus and it's a wrap.>>18765854Be aware, alert and stay vigilant. Cultural cancer has brought many a good man down.
>>18760954Culture = cult of the bull
>>18760954It's when you put seasonan on dat chicken and shieeett
>>18760954Agreements between men who uphold that social order
>>18760954from community you need deep intrapersonal connections that also have a degree of isolation, so those communities develop unique traits, aspects, interests in the ultimate pursuit of hot sweaty sex with hot bitches
Everytime you hear about native americans, it's always about how they're peaceful nature-loving feminist hippies who gave women leadership, never had a term for rape as it never happened, and even instances of white women who willingly stayed with the native tribes after being kidnapped because they treated them better than white man did (stockholm syndrome anyone?)Is there a native tribe that oppressed women? A tribe that makes even an evangelical protestant piss his pants.
>>18768638You never heard of a squag?You were horribly brainwashed.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JHtAQUX0has
>>18768638>Were there any indigenous American tribes that treated women horribly?Yes. I will not elaborate
>>18768638>you hear about native americans, it's always about how they're peaceful nature-loving feminist hippies who gave women leadershipIt's because you're listening to leftie hippie talk duh
China is:More freedom than America. (Only one rule, do not insult CPP, but why would you? There is no reason to insult the CCP as they are superior to American government).China spend less money on ai than America but Chinese ai is better and less expensive to the users.China is homogenous, everyone in China is Chinese, unlike America which is a soup of dirt and slime.Taiwan is not the real China, everyone hated the Republic, they lost fairly and squarely, the people preferred the communal party of the people.
>>1876859080% of the japanese are jomon (over evolved abbo), yayoi (korean) and northeast asian mutts. There's no 'pure' people on Earth.
>>18768396>muh bubble popcompare evergrande going bust with 2008, and use that comparison when understanding the chinese ai bubble popping vs the american ai bubble popping
>>18768583Sounds like you're thinking of the differences between Northern Han and Southern Han rather than talking about the current minority groups, which are groups like Mongols, Manchus, Uygurs, Tibetans, Koreans, etc. Some are indistinguishable from the Han like the Manchus, others couldn't be more different like the Uygurs.
>>18768592>80% of the japanese are jomonWrong. That would put 80% of the Japanese population as being Ainu, not Yamato, who descend from the Yayoi. The Yayoi are also unrelated to Koreans, living in the peninsula before Koreans actually got there. Only up 20% of Japanese have that Jomon dna present, and no studies restrict testing to Yamato people only, making it possible for Ainus and Ryukyuans to be included in that roughly 80% figure, which is always highest where they live and lowest where little are present. In summary, you're talking out of your ass and are genuinely retarded.
>>18768597>Mongols, Tibetans, UyghursI wasn't talking about them and you know it.Plus Manchus are like 3 people in far eastern Siberia today.
Tradition will not save you, nor will religion save you. Neither your church nor denomination will save you. Not one ritual will ever save you.Instead, this is what the Father desires: a heart full of love, eyes that do not condemn, a mouth that speaks what is true, and ears that listen humbly. For this is our law: that you become like Him and follow the example His Son set before you: love, compassion, justice, mercy, faithfulness, humility, and impartiality. In everything, practice these. Pray that your words be rebuked if you are speaking what is false.Tell me: what good is it to follow the law outwardly but inwardly be in rebellion against it? Surely, this has no value?Instead, become the kind of person who follows the law naturally. In this are fulfilled His words: "Make a tree good, and its fruit will be good." Become someone who loves unconditionally, who forgives without limit, someone who gives generously. In this, the law is perfected: that you love your neighbour as yourself.Know this: "The Lord does not look at the things people look at. People look at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart."The true security of salvation comes from knowing the Father through the Son. Though men call you a heretic, He loves you. Though they condemn you to hell, in that day, may the one who does His will be exalted.This is the Father's will: that you listen to His Son and let His teaching transform you.How can hate remain in love, or falsehood in truth? How can there be pride in humility or partiality in justice? How can there be condemnation in compassion or rebellion in faithfulness?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
There is only one between man and God, and that is Christ.
Blessed is anyone who listens to these words."Whoever accepts anyone I send accepts me; and whoever accepts me accepts the one who sent me."
