[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]

[Advertise on 4chan]

[Catalog] [Archive]

File: images.jpg (11 KB, 300x168)
11 KB
Why exactly was the Song of Solomon considered important enough to the Biblical Canon to have been included in not only Catholic/Orthodox Bibles but Protestant as well? Of all the fucking books they could've included in the core biblican canon, why a random erotic poem? Why isn't this considered Deuterocanonical or Apocrypha?
45 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
Judaism is a middle ages gnostic cult based on the Babylonian Talmud though, it isn't even part of the Bible.
So jews didn't kill christ?
The Biblical Jews had a hand in it, especially their leaders who were behind the plot. However, we are all responsible for the crucifixion in the sense that we have sinned, which means Christ really went to the cross for every single person's sins, past, present and future.

"The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world."
- John 1:29

"And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;
Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;
And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it."
- Colossians 2:13-15

"This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief."
- 1 Timothy 1:15
The Old Testanent canon of 39 books came from the Jews who categorize Song of Songs as one of five distinguished scrolls of scripture.

File: 9k=(3).jpg (42 KB, 600x900)
42 KB
>Your two breasts are like two fawns,
>twins of a gazelle,
>that feed among the lilies.
So... it's about Jesus ogling the church's titties?

File: 1536736476720.gif (1.96 MB, 500x281)
1.96 MB
1.96 MB GIF
What would the legacy/impact/butterfly effect of Columbine be had their bombs exploded? For those unaware, Columbine was a planned bombing before it was a shooting. Both planted homemade 20lb propane bombs surrounded by pipe bombs and molotovs in the Cafeteria. They had head counted while planning and figured 11:17AM was the time when most people are in the Cafeteria. The bombs did not detonate and they instead just started shooting.
So what does a world look like where the bombs did explode?
no different. They went after guns and video games. The bombs would make them include movies or some retarded shit.
i think a better question is what would school be like if columbine never happened. Or if there would be school shootings if the columbine shooters didn't inspire others.
I think Adam Lanza still would've still committed mass murder as he has inspirations other than Columbine in anders breivik and kaczynski.
I wonder what the less intelligent mass murderers like elliot rodgers, nikolas cruz, and that chud face texan walmart shooter would be doing if it weren't for columbine. I really don't think any of them are intelligent or creative enough to come up with anything on their own.
I wouldn't say anything to Columbine. I would have listened

File: undefined.jpg (1.28 MB, 2664x1998)
1.28 MB
1.28 MB JPG
What exactly would happen if a crown prince was discovered to be gay but wanted to adopt. Would the adopted child be in line for the throne? Additionally what would happen with their partner, they be made a prince?
14 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
>. If the prince was gay then he is denying God's Law, which would invalidate his right to rule
As opposed to all the sinless monarchs there have been?
That's how gay swans do it.
>If the prince was gay then he is denying God's Law
Why did God's law let a bunch of drunken central asian communists gun down a literal Christian saint of a monarch in 1918? Was God taking a nap or something?
>What exactly would happen if a crown prince was discovered to be gay but wanted to adopt. Would the adopted child be in line for the throne? Additionally what would happen with their partner, they be made a prince?
It just wouldn't be done. They would go about that aspect of their life in intense privacy and appoint a brother/nephew/uncle/cousin/brother-in-law/etc. as next heir if its laws were bound by male primogeniture. Sultan Qaboos of Oman was rumoured to be a homosexual, and was recently succeeded by his first cousin. Monarchy in most contexts depends on stable tradition.
Concerning adoption in any circumstance, they're neither in the line of succession, nor can inherit any titles. They're not considered heirs of the 'body' in this traditional aspect, regardless of newer laws for ordinary people.
Concerning the title of any potential spouse, a heterosexual example he had with Prince Phillip, who was prince-consort, since a king outranks a queen. A spouse cannot outrank or be the same rank as their partner. In a homosexual relationship, this just wouldn't happen, they'd not be granted a title since the household wouldn't recognise it.
Militarism and wedding songs

File: Rhonda_Goes_Broke.jpg (237 KB, 768x576)
237 KB
237 KB JPG
Are we in the Great Tribulation right now?
10 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
Probably a libtard Amerimutt not a Marxist
Pre industrial-revolution life was more soulful, you're gonna have to live with that libcuck.
What's the difference really?
"Lo! They are one!"
"Yeah man.... we're all the same."
"We are equal... it's just some people are more equal than others. Somone has to be the big man, y'know?" *Points to cranium*

Ears prick when they start babbling.
Ears burn when they start babbling of order and control.

[Prescribe the state-mandated regimented lifestyle here.]

All I know is faithless put their faith into themselves. And they are not all knowing - so will take measures to ensure they are. It's a dumb descision because they wind up being psychopathic in the end. But it gives them comfort to know what they think they know.

Have at it.
File: insanity.jpg (13 KB, 443x203)
13 KB
Dreams of being like God are coming to fruition. Would like to be a fly on the wall in that mans' life.
People can't leave others alone. It's gonna royally f**k em one day.

File: FfpANpZUcAE8yiw.jpg (342 KB, 1080x1080)
342 KB
342 KB JPG
There are no scientific evidence of the Aryan Invasion Theory. No excavations of ancient corpses proving that there was a population of huWhite males with European features during that time era (1500 BC). Also, no signs of the Indus Valley Civilization being ransacked and signs of war. The spread of the R1a is simply explained by populations expanding and reproducing. This haplogroup is also found isolated in Africa which does not make sense.

Simply put, it never happened. There is evidence of Aryans moving out of India and into Europe though as archaic Europeans had brown skinned.

South Indians (AASI) have ancient Iranian (Aryan) hunter gatherers as well (Iran_N), but this migration took place way before the Rig Veda were written.
21 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
It happened but they were as distant to Swedes as the latter was distant to south europeans, so tyey were not like modern euros at all.
they were more WSH–rich than modern Swedes.
Dasa Tamil trash. Your shit brown drum worshipping ancestors were slaves

File: 1707655487662864.gif (72 KB, 499x368)
72 KB
Not a single battle before the advent of photography can actually be proven as having taken place. We just have to assume because of things written down on paper or dug up in a random field.
1 reply omitted. Click here to view.
>If I never seen it happen it never happened
You shouldn't believe in any historical event unless you witnessed it yourself.
Historical solipsims is the only rational position
File: k1000692.jpg (1.54 MB, 2957x2309)
1.54 MB
1.54 MB JPG
I own a Prussian medal given to veterans of the Battle of Königgrätz 1866. Would you count this as prove that the battle took place?
What about the political result of the Battle of Königgrätz?
All faked
>ok, Austria: You act like you were inflicted a humiliating defeat at Königgrätz for the next 100+ years. And give us parts of Southern Germany as well. And don't involve yourself in the German unification which you desperately wanted to do. Deal? Deal.

File: Jay Dyer.jpg (62 KB, 512x512)
62 KB
/his/'s thoughts on Jay Dyer and Eastern Orthodoxy in general?
23 replies and 6 images omitted. Click here to view.
>Because the church said so.
How did it say so?
Did it say in a Church Council Canon?
>And the church says so with regard to what the eccumenicals are and how they're infalliable.
So your saying Councils are infallible because the Church Councils say so, but when they say "yo nigga, if a man don't do X he fuckin anthema n shieeet" that that isn't canoncical because it just isn't okay.
RIGHT............. I don't think I have an answer to that. Its so b rutally circular and self referential. There is no objective standard, its utterly fluid while pretending to be unchanging.

>Canon 1 of Nicea I:
>TLDR people who chop their balls off can't be priests
>Yeah, sounds very related to "the faith" to me.
Anon, I.......... doesn't it?

>They applied man made traditions and not traditions by God.
Your church is full of manmade traditions.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>How did it say so?
>Did it say in a Church Council Canon?

To put this in context it was Levitcal law. They said so at the Council of Jerusalem and set the bounds.

More laws on what a person ought to do is by tradition and interpreted by the church.

> that that isn't canoncical because it just isn't okay.

Yes. The official Orthodox stance is holy tradition is infallible, and Eccumenical councils manifest this holy tradition. This is similar to the Catholics, where they give at least 4 things that are infalliable, one is holy tradition. The church has interpreted the Councils to be infalliable in the way they did.

>Your church is full of manmade traditions.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>Anon, I.......... doesn't it?

I will also clarify that I might have been wrong on the piece of evidence I used. But I feel certain there are canon laws that are purely circumstantial. I once thought of testing the consistency between councils and saw some canon law that seemed non applicable and just useless really. Or dated.

It is late and I will admit I read half of what I sent and thought it was fine. So, that was my bad. I guess it didn't work. I wanted to acknowledge that.
You’re too dumb to have any sense of how dumb you are.
Being good looking doesn’t make you correct automatically or successful, it just helps with being successful. It is especially stupid to spread some guy’s ideas because you think they’re attractive. I mean you’re just gay and turned on by him, that’s literally what that is.
Being gay isn’t a bad thing but being stupid is
>To put this in context it was Levitcal law. They said so at the Council of Jerusalem and set the bounds.
I was talking more about what ecumenical councils are infallible and how they are infallible.
Because if your standard is "we know the councils are infallible because the councils stay they are infallible" then you're trapped in circular logic.
>Yes. The official Orthodox stance is holy tradition is infallible,
And councils are a part of holy tradition. If you say that part of Holy Tradition is no longer infallible or valid then you have changed Holy Tradition. If you Change Holy Tradition you violate the Holy Tradition (Councils) that say you can't change Holy Tradition.
>Your church is full of manmade traditions.
Then how do you explain the canons not being infallible. If they are the product of the council and the council is infallbile because its the product of the Holy Spirit the canons are the product of God. God does not change. If the Canons have change they must be products of men.
>No, it is of God.
Then they can't change. Boom simple as.
>Not what happened, some of them are circumstantial and arbitrary
God is not arbitrary. I don't mean this as an attack on you as a person but your church theologically is trying to wriggle out of a knot it tied itself. You dont want to be bound by the canons you accidentally created.
>Yeah, I am not a priest nor a bishop.
Well then we are at personal interpretation level.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1701470292152004.jpg (301 KB, 1000x1000)
301 KB
301 KB JPG
"Marrying you is a bad idea and having lots of kids idea" is hilarious considering we are descendants of people marrying young and raise a family even with a subsistence level lifestyle.
you had a stroke writing that?
Smartest tranime troon
illiterate australoidinsect tranny
actual monkeys have higher social value than you
>when you take this much flak
You are over the target.
Try saying that in English, Muhammad Al Pakistani

File: IMG_2537.jpg (180 KB, 819x724)
180 KB
180 KB JPG
I have access to newspaper archives going back to the 17th century, stuff that’s behind a paywall. They’re mostly American papers, but it helps so much with research - especially in finding addresses, grave locations that aren’t on FindAGrave, and info on stuff that’s hard to find on Google.

If anyone has anything I can help with, post a location, date range, and some keywords! I’ll try to find some old clippings for you. Will be a bit busy with exercise and nursing my hangover but I’m glad to help, Anons!
post torrent
Pls find as much stuff as you can on:
>Nikola Tesla
>Howard Hughes

2 geniuses that went 'crazy', which I don't believe

File: original_w7jHx6X.jpg (184 KB, 1600x1000)
184 KB
184 KB JPG
Culture is greater and stronger than religion, even Islam which is so coercitive, can't doblegate strong people like Caucasus peoples abandoning their habits. As I view it, they are basically "greek" descendants with a praying habit but totally distinct from their "muslim brothers" from Arabia, Mahgreb, Africa, etc
16 replies and 1 image omitted. Click here to view.
You are retarded OP.

>they are basically "greek" descendants
More retarded than I thought.
Georgians are just as dumb lmao, they set up an act of protest for a seemingly "pro-russian" law that in reality is a basic protection against foreign influence. Im appalled as to how these mongrels build all of their personality from blind hate. The hohols of Caucasus. Armenians may be good people, but as a state theyre even more retarded
>you should bend over for the Kremlin tovarisch, Russia is your friend!
They were literally invaded by Russia.
>simping for these literal retards whose presence in history is null
>On December 22, 1800, after almost a year of reflection, Paul I, fulfilling the request of the dying George XII, signed the Manifesto on the annexation of Georgia (Kartli-Kakheti) to Russia, promulgated on January 18, 1801.

Why are Independent Fundamentalist Baptists so downright hostile to all other forms of Christianity? Like if you see any of them online they'll use the most heinous language and insist that if you don't believe in their exact interpretation of sola scriptura and once saved always saved you're going to burn in hell. They think they can do anything they want because of their theology. I'm genuinely curious how all of this even begun.. was it started by Steven Anderson or does it go back even further than that?
Yeah they're pretty nutty. Other Protestants who don't have the exact same view about the rapture are heretics who are going to hell, non-Protestants are pagan demon-worshippers who've never heard of Jesus, etc. etc.
They just have the same opinion of other Christians as other Christians have of atheists, agnostics and people of other faiths lol.

a history-related topic
10 replies and 2 images omitted. Click here to view.
Says whom? I’ve never heard that, “orient” evokes swarthy magean cultures and desert landscapes. For example, there’s the term “orientalist.”
Kek came here to post this
how is this division prefered by the saars?
Lumping themselves with lighter skinned MENAs
Indians are always trying to be something they're not kek

Why did victorian fashion become so austre and drab? Compare this to the previous decades of fashion in the Regency.

File: download.jpg (201 KB, 1107x500)
201 KB
201 KB JPG
What is the reason for insane leftist retardation
17 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
Before I explain things to you, do you support Bom by any chance
I meant blm
No, no, the funniest part is that first not all women behave like that, just like men it's a portion. And second men would far more promiscuous if women weren't there to gatekeep them, there are studies pointing that men would be as promiscuous as gay men if it wasn't for women not being horny dogs like us. So idk what's this narrative about women being like this and like that, when sex is something universal to all humans and depending on their tendencies and circumstances they will act differently about it on an individual basis instead of muh wahmen are sluts nowadays.
>And second men would far more promiscuous if women weren't there to gatekeep them
literally none of this is relevant to what I'm saying
I'm talking about having kids not sex/abortions
Lead poisoning? Reasons not to rely on other people for your shit.

File: 30years.png (40 KB, 326x374)
40 KB
29 replies and 3 images omitted. Click here to view.
File: Windows 1618.png (453 KB, 512x377)
453 KB
453 KB PNG
Funnily enough, given Sweden's modern reputation as being pacifistic feminized bottoms, Sweden between 1611-1721 would probably be in the running for top 5 "most militarized state ever."
File: 1632.png (1.01 MB, 921x734)
1.01 MB
1.01 MB PNG
>Shot through the neck
>and Catolic to blame
>Gustav Adolf
>was my name!
A high fall into a pile of shit
Are you retarded?

[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.