Jewish archaeologist shows that Judaism is an invention of the second century BC. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JFinOxr8bAs&pp=ygUNeW9uYXRhbiBhZGxlcg%3D%3D
>>18173935What is the actual difference?
>>18174911The Catholic Church has existed for two thousand years unchanged tho
>>18175991I don't have exact dates for when Israel actually started (putting the Torah aside...), but Judea started as an administrative district of Persia. Thus, you had Judeans, or people of that province. Israel is what existed before this Persian province."Judaism" wouldn't exist until almost a millennium later. In between, you had Hellenistic Proto-Christianity created by Alexander's former generals to govern Persia's former province. That's where you get the Torah.To make matters a little more confusing, Platonism comes from Phoenician settlers in Greece, such as Pythagoras who is the forerunner to Plato. You can also see in Eusebius' recounting of Sanchuniathon that Phoenician cosmology is quite similar to later Platonism and later Torah.
>>18173926twenty first century BBC
>>18175993That is objectively not true. Can you still buy indulgences?
Why did Germany just given up in 1918? Not a single entente soldier was on German land. They coiuld fight and won.
>>18175464didn't they become completely stuck and worthless just from falling into ditches?
They should have just given up Saarland to British India so they could create the far superior Saarland bastards Aryan race.t. Saars
>They could have fought and won>Mass-desertion>Starvation>No manpower>Domestic revolution>Eastern insurgency>Collapsing frontline>No remaining allies>Enemy closing in from multiple frontsNo they actually did the right thing by suing for peace in the nick of time before Germany could be ravaged and the enemy could demand even harsher terms.The Hundred-days offensive was originally just a skirmish. Allies expected a real offensive to be ready in 1919. The Skirmish however turned into a complete rout and the allies realised that Germany was broken.Armistice was rushed because France and Britain freaked out that USA would give Germany a favorable peace.
>>18175464ENTER>Tankgewehr M1918 (Mauser 13mm anti-tank rifle): The first rifle designed specifically for destroying armored targets. >3.7 cm Tankabwehrkanone 1918: The world's first cannon purpose-designed as an anti-tank gun. >Maschinengewehr 18 Tank und Flieger (MG 18 TuF): A dual-purpose heavy machine gun designed for both anti-tank and anti-aircraft roles.
>>18176557They voted for Germany (Kingdom of Hanover)
Why did the Turks fail to conquer Western Europe? What were the historical reasons?
>>18175812Turks always got btfo by Western Europeans. From Italians to Germans
>>18175822Most pathetic cope I've seen in a while.
>>18175822Cope
The answer is the New World and the Spanish Hapsburg navy. Yes there were technological reasons but they were minor during the siege of Vienna. The Ottomans were at the heartland of Hapsburg lands. The Hapsburgs bounced back thanks to Poland and later Russia intervening. But it was the battle of Lepanto that kept the Mediterranean from becoming an Ottoman lake. The Safavid wars were important but not decisive and the Ottomans won several wars against them. The main problem was Spain becoming too great of a naval power and were never able to challenge them again. Conquering Vienna would not have solved this crucial problem for them and would have created overstretched supply lines.
The battle of Lepanto, and siege of Vienna.Also protestants ultimately failed in their attempts to sabotage unified Catholic resistance against the Turks. Not before untold damage was done though, millions were kidnapped and sold into either sex slavery or a slow death rowing galleys, entire coastal villages disappeared overnight. And this went on for centuries, with nary a single fuck given by the schismatics for those they no longer considered to be fellow Christians.>Rather Turk than papist.>>18176289Also this.The age of exploration was kicked off by the Turkish capture of Constantinople, which cut off European trade routes with the east.They were looking for an alternative route when they discovered America's existence. OFC it had been known to various Irish, Bretons, and Norse for some time previously but that didn't stop the news from being a surprise to others.And so the new world gradually eclipsed the old.
Why were the 1950's so peaceable in the US compared to other eras? Why did many Americans simply lose their desires to kill others during that decade in particular?
>>18175898Yeah it's hard to verify but it's a pretty consistently cited variable
>>18175946you're literally the tranny party, troon
>>18175140It wasn't bad all the way to the 2000s. The state was completely fucked by the late 00s recession and never recovered.
>>18175231>people still respond to mark
Why do atheists always regress back to the flying spaghetti monster tier quips whenever you touch on a sensitive subject which is related to the reason for atheism to begin with?It doesn't even work and then they just leave and disappear.Just dragging down the level of discourse by being two steps behind.
>>18173686If the supernatural was real where is it?>>18175915Christianity will be a black and brown religion lmaoooo
>>18174322>>18174334>What precise criteria for scientifically concluding existence of magic have you come up with?What you do with any science or claim. Observation and measurement. Then we can start the scientific magic to see where it originates from and what rules it follows. Just like anything else.
>>18176561They don't send their best.
>>18174245>There have been thousands of miracles and most of yall just go "idk , it's probably fake, whatever" lol. Because they are. Every religion claims miracles. When Indians have NDEs they see Shiva and Buddhist monks light fires with their minds. This is all hearsay and reported. There's no recordings, measurements, investigations, anything.What's more reasonable? Every single one of these religions being true, or it all being bullshit?
>>18173656>most well documentedGive me sources not corrupted by Christian scribes. I want names and dates of writing.
Did Hitler ever personally kill anyone? As in, not telling someone to do it but rather actually pulling the trigger on them?
>>18175852He killed two people, his niece and roommate. In both cases either abandoned by other people or provoked.Hitler was a rotschild so everyone around him was trash and his niece was abandoned by the rest of the family and then killed when Hitler got jealous. >>18175858As always his is a retard board.
There's a story about him personally shooting a captured SA officer during the Night of Long Knives, but it was told by SS officers to prosecutors in Munich in 1954 so we can safely assume they were subjected to barbaric and brutal torture, both mental and physical, as well as threats of violence and rape against their families (especially the young and the males), as well as complete financial domination and ruin, as well as lies of great rewards or exoneration if they made up stories about Hitler and the Nazis, since this was all documented and common for post-war Allied tribunals in those times. So take that story with a hefty dose of salt.
>>18175852Probably in WW1
>>18175949Did he carry rifle or pistol on those dispatch runs?>>18175852Its said when they busted the hotel with Rohm inside he wielded a whip.
>>18175852fpbp>>18175866>hitler killed two people and was a rotschild [sic]And you have the nerve to call other people retarded
What triggered the Mexican-American War?
>>18176461The Mexicans revolted against Spain you black nigger, Texas was the culmination of Spain's colonial history. They wanted to stop the US east of the Mississippi but that failed, they wanted to make a rump state in Alabama or Mississippi to stop US expansion. Aaron Burr probably wanted to move into Texas and start a separate US after the Democrat-Republicans failed to stop the Federalists sucking up to England, which is why he shot Hamilton. Spain inviting Americans into Texas was their last ditch play to stay relevant in the region but most of their stationed troops in Mexico defected and Mexico was never again relevant.
>>18176335me
>>18176464I am abolishment tooNobody has a right to own another human, and those that do think they can own another human deserve to be killed by their slaves
The Mexican–American War (1846–1848) was triggered by a combination of long-standing tensions and an immediate military confrontation. The key causes were:1. Annexation of Texas (1845)Mexico had never recognized the independence of Texas after it broke away in 1836. When the United States annexed Texas in 1845, Mexico viewed this as an act of aggression and a theft of its territory.2. Dispute over the Texas–Mexico BorderThe U.S. claimed the border was the Rio Grande.Mexico insisted it was the Nueces River, about 150 miles north.This left a large strip of land—the Nueces Strip—claimed by both countries.3. Polk’s Expansionist Policy (“Manifest Destiny”)U.S. President James K. Polk was committed to expanding U.S. territory to the Pacific. He attempted to buy California and New Mexico from Mexico, but Mexico refused even to meet with the U.S. envoy.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18176562The post-polk political coup is pretty interesting
Why didn't the bajorija rebel and cut his head off when he invited mudslime Mongoloids into Lithuania?
>>18176428because people in 13th century lithuania had different thoughts, opinions and priorities from you?
>>18176535No we didnt, reincarnation.
because the influx of mongolchad bvlls was a vast improvement to the lietuviae
>>18176544>chad bvlls
When you think about it, and disregard what you've been taught by judeo-christian government school employees, the existence of vril explains almost every event throughout history.
>man being in high school SUCKS!>should I stop being a loser>no instead I will shit up /his/ with schizo /x/ nonsenseMany such cases
*Destroys your silly little religion*
>>18174063All said technology will be maintained & controlled and influences by the the future's religious generations. Atheists, or more specifically, non-religious groups, will be gone and replaced as genetic dead-ends.
>>18174559>people are born believing a jew walked on waterThis is how I know you're mexican.
>>18174057>0.6 more kids is worth believing in retarded stories from a Jewish book???
>>18174549>t.I mean ffs, let actual intellectuals take over. This mogged tranny tried persuading secularists to a more spiritual lifestyle, not long after he was raped by a panther on hallucinegens.
>>18174629Statistics and historical data support it, even reality checks support atheists are genetical dead ends, what do you think is the end point of rationalism but nihilism? Trying to creat a moral code based on rationality and logic? Greeks and even indians already tried it, it'sall late urbante decay. As Spengler pointed out, when life becomes just a matter of sums life itself doesnt sum up. The average male atheist will never have children if not by accident, and the average femal atheist will never, abortion industry runs om female atheism.
Have there ever been any wars that really were “over by Christmas”? By that I mean, one side enters a war expecting a certain result and gets that result with no unintended consequences or delays?
>>18172776>Admiral Rawson had to drink his tea lukewarmThis is what a military disaster looks like
Panama, 1989
>>18172603The mongol invasion of japan was over well ahead of schedule.
>>18175503But would you say that was the Mongols goal?
>>18172603The wars of German unification, such as the Franco Prussian war.
https://openpsych.net/files/papers/Parra_2025a.pdfWhite British = 100. DiscussAlso, why does Greece score so low?>Greece: 92.57Is it likely the Ancient Greeks also averaged similarity in genetic potential for intelligence?
>>18176302Your blood pressure is spiking over an IQ chart
>>18176307you should get some new material
>>18171157Data having a large margin of error does not make them automatically wrong, nor that no correct conclusions can be drawn on it. If you know and can identify the bias of the data you can account for it and get a largely correct result. The fact that data free of said bias shows the same results is proof that Lynn was correct.
>>18176408This is correctFor instance, if you see somebody write "one set of data proves that a uselessly flawed set of data is correct" then you have a data point suggesting the are stupid as fuck and have no clue how any of this worksIf you run into other evidence that suggests the poster is stupid and illiterate, then it proves the flawed conclusion you drew from the tiny meaningless sample sizeExcellent work fellow scholars
>>18176415>you drew from the tiny meaningless sample sizeyou still sticking to this meme nigga? What about 37 thousand people is tiny >>18176198
Let me guess, you need more?
>>18174391Most English speakers nowadays don't understand the English in the KJV. Jude 22 is a good example of this, where the phrase used there had a completely different meaning back then compared to how we understand it nowadays.>And of some have compassion, making a differenceLet's test our understanding anons, what do you think "making a difference" means here?
>>18174391Kill yourself (proper response), mason trash can. Just kill yourself.
>>18174919>that's not faith that's insanityYeah this ignorant mythology is insane
>>18175244Having distinction..? So have compassion on some, but do so with discernment, treat different cases differently.
>>18174667>Then whyI'm not explaining anything to you; You are far, FAR too mentally retarded to understand the answer. And that's if you hadn't already decided that you hate God. You're going to Hell, forever. Enjoy.
>Greek pantheon has one powerful god who rules over the spiritual world>this world is inhabited by lesser gods that are not all powerful, but they are immortal beings more powerful than humans>the powerful god can impregnate human women to produce powerful offspring>this is a nonsensical arrangement, pagan garbage>Christian theology has one powerful God who rules over the spiritual world>this world is inhabited by angels that are not all powerful, but they are immortal beings more powerful than humans>the powerful God can impregnate human women to produce powerful offspring>this arrangement makes perfect sense, monotheistic treasure
>>18174328They also identified Hell with Hades, what's your point? They used the language they were familiar with to understand concepts with which they weren't.
>>18173430Graves analysis is fucking garbage, he connects every greek myth to his chariot-crashing young king sacrifice bullshit that he was reading about at the time, none of which has ever been attested to having actually existed.I know Graves is a national treasure and a literary genius and shit but this entire work is a bunch of fart-huffing nonsense, and when people beefed to him about it he just said "well I'm a poet so I understand these things better."Garbage.
>>18172683>Aphrodite is a mysterious addition; the story of her spontaneous birth from sea foam probably suggests that she was imported by foreign tradersAccording to the version of her birth recounted by Hesiod in his Theogony,[116][117] Cronus severed Uranus' genitals and threw them behind him into the sea.[117][118][119] The foam from his genitals gave rise to Aphrodite[5] (hence her name, which Hesiod interprets as "foam-arisen"),[5] while the Giants, the Erinyes (furies), and the Meliae emerged from the drops of his blood.[
Zeus is NEVER portrayed as being omnipotent or omniscient. Other gods routinely fuck up his plans, sneak around behind his back, or break the rules while he is distracted by some mortal poontang. He is also portrayed as a rebel who defeated other previous daddy creator gods.
>>18176330Sounds a bit similar to Athena.>>18176357>Zeus is NEVER portrayed as being omnipotent or omniscient.Not to other Gods he's not. Though he easily could defeat every one of them except maybe his brothers.
The harsh reality is that patriarchy is a strictly Mediterranean concept, practically nonexistent or much less elaborate and restrictive in northern countries; women have always had more influence and power over society and their husbands in the north than in the south. Some societies were even proto-feminist.>There are instances recorded where women participated both in warfare and in kingship, although they were in the minority in these areas. Plutarch reports that Celtic women acted as ambassadors to avoid a war among Celts chiefdoms in the Po valley during the 4th century BC>Tacitus wrote: Upon the Suiones, border the people Sitones; and, agreeing with them in all other things, differ from them in one, that here the sovereignty is exercised by a woman. So notoriously do they degenerate not only from a state of liberty, but even below a state of bondage.>I saw that women among the Rus' are treated with great respect and have great freedom. They can come and go as they please without needing permission from men."Ibn Fadlan, Risala (Report)
India is patriarchal to the point they abort girls over it, doesn't seem to be doing them a lot of favors at the moment
>>18176149Yes, we need egalitarian cultures
Rome was founded by Trojan bvlls from Anatolia who used the Celto-Italic Bell Beakers as cum dumpsters. Celts are the biggest losers of history.
>>18176206Rome was founded by Persians
>>18173633Reminder that:>Rome lost>Germania conquered the world>Lombards (Germanic) rule Italy>Italy is Germany's debt slave>Rome is now ruled by a literal blonde, blue-eyed womanTotal GermGOD Victory
