99% of you on here are going to hell. God hates you. The KJV hates you. Enjoy hell. :)
>>18662364They were children, therefore not yet hell-bound. How could children with spiritual gifts be deceived? Only sinners fall for demons.
>>1866237910 and 8 years old are plenty old enough to lie and sin. Just face it, you're going to cling to the delusion no matter what because you're brown. You'd have more integrity if you just admitted that fact. But if you had integrity then you wouldn't be Catholic, would you? Shitskin.
>>18662233No one will go to hell because there is no afterlifeNothing happens when you die except you rot
>>18662389I don't care what hateful trash like you has to say.
>>18662392You're so fucked. :) Tick tock.
How the fuck did Pentecostalism successfully influence Catholicism of all denominations? Wtf? There are legit Evangelical Catholics now because of it. Evangelicalism isn't just a Protestant movement anymore, it's also a Catholic thing. Wtf? Particularly among American Catholics, many of them appear like Evangelicals...
>>18662482No. People still worshipped Saint Wilgefortis, she just didn't get into official ecclesiatic art much.
>>18662524Every single church around medieval europe had its own practices, the counterreformation ended many of these and replaced them with a regularized practice based on that of rome. Why are you denying this?
>>18661227>This is such an incoherent statement, man, I hate modernity. Evangelicalism and Protestantism used to be synonyms, the term “Evangelical” was coined by Martin Luther as the name for his movement because he hated the term Lutheran.Ok and the term that Lutherans use is different from the term non-mainline Anglo-American Protestants use. Lutherans call themselves "evangelisch" whereas the term for Anglo-American Protestants of the non-mainline persuasion is "evangelikal." Also, words change meaning over time retard. So it literally doesn't matter. Evangelicalism, today at least, is not Lutheranism. It's a specific brand of Protestant, and now potentially Catholic, Christianity that emphasizes a personal experience and/or relationship with God. Get over it.
The church founded on barley concealed paganism (saint and icon worship) takes more superstitious voodoo nonsense into its practices?
>>18663103You know you're going to hell, right?
What was the ideology of a Bonapartist? Was it literally just>whatever, just let a bonaparte ruleor was there more to it?It seems to be:>limited "revolutionary" ideas; democracy fine, but ideally controlled. people's rights also fine to a limited level>big army>big france>death to prussia
>>18662825>bonapartism>democracy fineWhat?
>>18662885didn't they believe that a level of "democracy" was fine provided it was quite controlled? ie late 2nd empire constitution
>>18662825Actual Bonapatism is radically central and realistically pragmatic, completely against ideology.It has a few principles:>A member of House of Bonaparte has to be the head of state>strong and centralized state with advanced yet efficient administration and bureaucracy>Political stuff should be concentrated around the head of state and all of these sort of partisanship nonsense should be banned>strong and large armed forces modernized to the latest innovations and reforms>Everything else is just choosing the most sensible option at the timePretty much that. Everything else is cope.>>18662903And that was the reason its army got blocked from reforming by politicians, then a few years later those same politicians forced Napoleon III into war with Prussia.
>>18663068The catastrophe of the Franco Prussian War is one that the liberals have greater blame for. They were the chief agitators, had undermined the military years before, and afterward chose to carry on the war even after Sedan, believing a levee in mass of human waves would somehow stop the Germans like it did in the 1790s. The fact the 3rd republic survived was an accidental thing, with the French Right-Wing monarchists infighting/incompetence while General MacMahon normalized the new regime.
I know it's a common question, but I'd like to revisit it and see that /his/ thinks. Who do you consider to be the greatest military mind/general of antiquity? Pic rel are the popular choices of course (I would personally also include Philip II of Macedon).Personally, to me it's Philip and Caesar. Philip for innovation (and had he not been assassinated...huge what if). Caesar for sheer accomplishments and scope of his military career. Fighting and defeating Gauls, Germanics, Egyptians, Pontics, fellow Romans etc. His actual tactics remain impressive, obviously the famous Alesia and Pharsalus.
>>18661536>Military strategyHannibal and Philip.>Political strategyCaesar.>Battlefield tacticsHannibal and Pyrrhos.>Operational logistics and organizationHannibal and Pyrrhos.>Personal leadership and combatAlexander.>Military innovation and reformHannibal and Philip.Imagine not including Pyrrhos, whom Hannibal studied a lot and borrowed from.
>>18661932Maybe I should learn more about Pyrrhos. I know he was held in high regard back then, but nowadays most know him as the guy who lost to Rome despite a few costly victories
>>18662671Hannibal copied a lot from Pyrrhos and admired him for his audacity, which the former believed was a necessary trait for any good general.Pyrrhos is, without any irony, a battlefield tactician and operational commander of the highest order. The problem was as a war strategist, although good, he was too bold for his own good; opening too many fronts against different opponents while pushing the resources of his own state to their limits.He was also highly successful against Rome, campaigning in Southern Italy and winning several major victories, but logistics for his own army and difficulty in political alliances with his allies (Syracuse and others) meant he couldn't stay indefinitely in Italy and had to retreat.
>>18661536Alexander was the greatest, according to Hannibal. Alexander built an empire off of sheer big dick energy.
>>18663082>Alexander was the greatest, according to Hannibal.To be fair, Hannibal said that as an answer to Scipio asking of all people, after the Punic War, I think it was a pissing contest>Scipio is reported to have faced Hannibal- the boogeyman of his time- and asked him (amongst other things) who he thought to be the best general to have ever lived. Hannibal pondered this for some time before stating that there were three. First, as the supreme general, came Alexander the Great, for his ability to outmaneuver superior forces and for being the first to have travelled to and conquered such distant regions. After a long pause Hannibal conceded Pyrrhys must naturally be the second, due to the man’s ability to choose the ground on which he placed his troops. When Scipio pressed Hannibal to name who he thought deserved to be counted amongst such historical titans as the third, Hannibal instantly named himself. A stunned Scipio reportedly laughed in disbelief, and asked “And what would you say if you had defeated me instead of the other way around?” To which Hannibal is said to have smiled and replied, “Then I would have placed myself before Alexander, Pyrrhus, and all generals yet to live.” Historians have poured over this conversation, weighing implied slights and compliments in the exchange. Some say Scipio was embittered by Hannibal’s refusal to acknowledge him as the man’s superior. Others mock Hannibal for being a narcissist.
Calvinism has the most Biblically accurate take on salvation/damnation.Ephesians 2:8-9>For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast.This verse confirms whether you're damned/saved is entirely deterministic.
>>18662726I think he's saying the capacity of salvation through faith in jesus is the gift from god, because the next verse says "For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do."So god has prepared you to do good works and that is the gift from god, but you might still not do it.
>>18662765According to Calvinism you don't actually have to do anything, God decided when he created the universe if you were going to hell or not.
>>18662772What's the catch, why would I be a good Christian then?
>>18662811Calvinists believe worshipping God is your explicit purpose even if his ultimate intention is just to torture you for eternity.
>>18662726>out of all of them, elephant shit is the best to eat!im sure it is goy
>Let's review your record>You ate lobster on April 5, 1989>You wore a shirt made from two different materials on March 1, 1974>You divorced your abusive husband on December 1, 2000, but the divorce was not for the reason of adultery/fornication>Now, those are all pretty serious crimes but I guess I can forgive it all because you believed that I sacrificed myself to myself, but wait... what's this???>You were a new-age neo-orthodox western baptist and NOT a proto-classic archaic-orthodox eastern baptist?!?>WHAT THE FUCK?>ENJOY BURNING BITCH>MWUAHAHAHAHAJA!!!
>>1866291899% of people believe the earth is round /now./My point is saying, truth is universally agreed upon. Is retarded, and I am sure you are aware of this.
>>18662949Yes, now after the evidence is so insurmountable you would be retarded to believe otherwise.Christcucks and other religiontards have been trying to convince others for millennia and are still failing miserably. The best approach for convincing they've come up with is colonization and indoctrination. Almost like there is no actual evidence
>>18661615Welcome to Heaven, my son.
>>18662953>Trying to convince others and are still failing miserably>2.3 to 2.6 billion Christians Guess they convinced others after all.
>the law was fulfilled so none of this applies to me, it's only for jews, except for these lawsI get people who are born into this bullshit being stockholm syndromed into keeping this up for decades of their life, but imagine being some fat retard who converted to Christianity because of other idiots posting infographs and video edits on the internet
>create an explicitly genocidal secessionist ethnostate (Republika Srpska)>the West lets you keep this ethnostate after the war >pretend you're a victim at the hands of the WestCan someone explain the Serbian narrative of the Bosnian War?
>>18662638yes they're ethnically different from south Slavs who inhabit the Balkans, religion nonwithstanding, hence why Serbs wanted to genocide them, rightly mind you.After Bill Clinton liberated them and Tony Blair recognized their sovereignity, it was beyond over, hence why Serbia has imploded into 3 countries since losing the war, while Croatia remains geopolitically unchanged.tl;dr: albozergs are something like jeets or gypsies, but they claim to be Illyrians n shiet
>>18663007Project harder smrd
>>18662526What do you think of the question though, did those ethnic groups ruin the reputation of all slavs
>>18663012t.tonibler
>>18663041>malding ciganovičLmao
What was Norway like from the middle ages to the 19th century?
>>18663017Plague ravaged
>>18663030Hard to believe virus’s could do well in such a cold environment. Aren’t they more geared towards warm weather?
Fishing, nuff said.
What makes an intergenerational consensual homosexual incest not normal? From all common liberal talking points this should be a perfectly acceptable behavior. Or to phrase it differently, can anything consensual be not normal?
>>18663029>I was raped therefore its normal
>>18663029The truth is that jews fear inbreeding as it allows white people to retain wealth. That's why there will never be a push to normalize it despite the fact that there's nothing wrong with it going off regular secular morals. They also fear pedophilia in a similar way but did experiment letting the goyim be pedophiles in germany once.
>>18663029whack this faggoty trolling shit go kys op
Honestly, FUCK the baptists like hellanon for trying to sow division among the Christian church. We have bigger threats to our religion like islam and hinduism and buddhism, the other sects are only minor deviations. All mainstream churches are christians lol.
>>18662760enjoy hell, heretic.
>>18662760How are Buddhism and Hinduism a threat to Christianity?
>>18662760Judeochristian biggest threat are your pathetic abysmal birth rates as well as your sons rather becoming pet fathers and doing sodomy and being atheisticSuch is the natural progression of following a jewish supremacist death cult like christianity
>>18662760>the other sects are only minor deviationsAnd there's the rub - our people could switch to those with very little effort.
>>18662760Why would you post this image with this text
>In 1939, there was 1 car in Germany for every 47 Germans.They really thought they could take over Europe and Russia with fucking horses?
>>18661745So now we are moving goalposts again, from that I infer you have no argument and concede that the Red Army only won through superior numbers? Fine for me
>>18661750no it was Wehrmacht that was initially winning through sup superior numbers.
>>18658227>US will never be led by a Roosevelt again
>>18659358Hitler was always going to invade Russia.
>>18660450Don't knock Soviet manufacturing either. They pumped out crazy volume. Learned from American engineers.
1/2 It's clear that feminism, as a concept, is flawed and has always been since its origin everyone knows that. But I must say that I don't believe in "anti-feminist women." Conservatives and anti-feminists (especially women) love to cite historical "anti-feminist" female leaders like Phyllis Schlafly or Mrs. Humphry Ward, but there's an ironic paradox: to defend the idea that "a woman's place is in the home and away from politics," which is true, these conservative leaders needed to travel the country giving fiery public speeches, write opinion pieces, organize committees, and do strong political lobbying with congressmen, all in a political environment. to preach submission and withdrawal from public life, (which again, is correct), they acted in an extremely political and public way.Although I despise the suffragettes with all my might, in pointing out the hypocrisy of the "anti-suffragettes" using the very freedom they fought against, they were right.men should be the ones to act politically, but Figures like Mrs. Humphry Ward, when criticized on this point, would engage in mental gymnastics and cope arguments that women could and should participate in charitable leagues, school boards, and local health districts bla bla as this would be an "extension of the home.
>>18662818>but it's not fair to blame the women>simply victims of brainwashing.>We can't blame womenWhy do conservatives have to act this way? Instead of admitting that these women are simply evil, right-wingers will cope by claiming they're "just dumb" or "misled" or whatever. You're part of the problem, my friend.Their main political issue in recent decades has been murdering their unborn children so they can be promiscuous until they're really old and ugly and work a shitty job in an Office are also the fault of the joooos, right?
>>18662818Shut up simp
>>18662815>men today will breed with almost anything>somehow this is womens’ fault>>18662496Women worked all the time in the past, especially poor womenThe idea of the stay at home mom is something of a more recent (post-industrial rev) middle class idealThe reason most feminists rejected that ideal is because money is autonomy. If your husband died or was abusive, you were shit out of luck
>>18662840Off topic, retard
>>18662788traditionalism, just like feminism, is a right-wing extremist movement involving the abuse of sons and the killing of men. Both ideologies must be abolished.
Was he a cuckold?Was jochi his actual son?
>>18662961It was not mongol custom to just kill children. They had to be a certain height to be executed. And Genghis was known for 'adopting' into his family several non blood relatives who proved to be excellent commanders as well as very loyal to him and the Chinggisids. Muqali, Bo'orhul (probably misspelling) Bo'orchu, Shihi Qutuqu etc. were not related to him, but were still part of the inner circle
>>18662976This makes me think that they weren't quite as animalistic as they might seem, and that they actually had some form of social organization. I come from a Third World country where I've seen men on numerous occasions say that they wanted to kill children as young as seven simply because their mother was attractive, and that they wished they could kill her children so they could have children of their own with her, more or less like animals such as lions do. Fascinating.
>>18662980>This makes me think that they weren't quite as animalistic as they might seem, and that they actually had some form of social organizationTell me you got all your information about the Mongols previously from media and games without telling me
>>18662983On the contrary, I know descendants of Genghis Khan in real life. Doubt me?
>>18662980They absolutely were not. Although bride kidnapping was practiced, there were certain rules that they could not break without facing severe punishment. If word got out that a certain tribe broke an unwritten rule of the Yahsa (their traditional code), they could well be exterminated like what happened to the Tatar tribe that poisoned Genghis' father and other examples. There was a baseline of humanity that most Mongols adhered to and some understanding/solidarity among tribes despite all the endless feuds, but what matters is also how they viewed non-Mongols especially after the expansion.
Prove to me he wasn't a British spy working for Anglo-Rothschild capitalist bankster interests
>>18662965>We're talking about 1948, not the Balfour declarationAnon what is the Balfour Declaration i don't think you know
>>18662967The 1917 proclamation allowing Jews to move to Palestine. It did not create an independent Jewish state
>>18662941>And it had no power or influence on the world stage going back to the 16th century, unlike the UKit's successor states did>You seem to ignore that the UK was the home of international Jewry alongside France and had way more world influence than France tooYes, england was better than france. What have you proved? The intial argument was that anglos like jews. All you've said here is that anglos are better than the french and jews benefitted from that, as they would have benefited were the french better.>the US ruling class is still overwhelmingly WASPsProve it>Please show me this French and Slavic support for "Jewish terrorists"The french and ussr supplied weaponry to jewish paramilitary groups, you can look this up. It's very well known but you aren't aware since you don't care about history you care only for blaming anglos for everything you dislike.>the Balfour declaration Means nothing, it's just a statement
>>18662934>started so many wars over their dumb made up protestant religion,Yeah how dare they come up with their own religion and not be subservient to rome. The papacy lost all legitimacy with the gregorian reforms, it was asking for a reformation.>killed so many Europeans for their heresy.As catholics also did?
>>18662969Allowing? That’s not what it was anon…
Christians simply can't cope with the thought that not everyone believes in God. It's like an OCD thing.
>>18661070>Christians simply can't cope with the thought that not everyone believes in God. It's like an OCD thing.This is what is known as "projection". You have a massive tumor in your brain which makes you writhe in agony whenever someone professes faith in the LORD. Being an autistic gaytheist, you also have serious theory of mind issues, which means that you assume that believers feel the same way about your disbelief. However, we actually just don't really care about you. At most, we think you're pathetic. Enjoy Hell.
>>18662371And yet you care enough to threaten his death, by wishing him well in your supposed afterlife. Call-To-Action behavior and veiled threat(s), masking as a niceity. Enjoy violating United States Law.
>>18662371>we actually just don't really care about you>spends hours every day autistically screeching in a thousand threads about how they're going to helluh huh
>>18662371HIT ME YOU FUCKING PUSSY NIGGER AND I WILL FUCKING END YOU
>>18661207>No, MY neurotic behavior is totally different
