Why was Austria Hungry so bad at war during WWI? They were a diverse, multiethnic country and since diversity is strength shouldn't they have been able to rape and gape the bongs, frogs and commies? Did they have inferior firearms or artillery or something?
>>18288733Americans are white and first world, aka everything yurop isn't
>>18288744yuro poors are third world swarthy tranny homosexuals who eat human shit
>>18288784>but they were still more than good enough to BTFO the Italians on their own.literal africans btfo'd italians. it's like beating a one armed man at boxing
>>18289367>>18289371>SAAR PERFECT HAY GRAMMAR PLEASE TO BE REDEEMING THE YURO POOR SAAR
>>18289379>esl yuro thirdy doesn't know how to readmany such cases
>>18287288Me, I did.
>>18287288>Lacked of Reason>opressSarr
>>18288663>Rome's ability to remain RomanHmm...>When Rome was strong, immigration made it stronger. >When Rome was weak, immigration exposed that weakness.So Rome was strong, then massive immigration happened after their elites robbed countless Roman military veterans of their land and subsequently invited hordes of random foreigners in, and then Rome became weak and ongoing mass migration made the problem worse.
>>18287288Their own people.
>>18287333>feudal society was far more egalitarian and beneficial for the common manFeudal society propagated manorlism and serfdom across Europe. When Feudalism was introduced to England it made the English people less free and subjugated them to a new system of lords and structures which weakened their legal standing as opposed the the older Anglo-Saxon court system. Feudal society was not egalitarian at all, it was literally based on birthright, unlike a Roman who could rise from obscurity to the highest offices in the state if they did well enough, you could only be a feudal lord if you were born into it. >>18288657I wouldn't call hostile armed invasion 'immigration'. >>18289291> then massive immigration happened after their elites robbed countless Roman military veterans of their land What the fuck are you talking about? Veterans got land, and they got plenty of it. There was no issue supplying them with land, in fact the Roman state had the exact opposite problem, there was too much unused land and there were laws made to try to counteract this.>subsequently invited hordes of random foreigners inThey didn't do this. The only group that was invited with the Visigoths and not even a year later they decided to expel them because they were hostile to Roman authority. If the Romans had their way they would all have been dead before they crossed the Danube or the Rhine.
Could a South American country have become as dominant in South America as the USA is in North America?Why does Brazil not seem nearly as dominant considering their population (216 million) is 4 times the size of the second most populated country Colombia (52 million)I really feel Argentina squandered the best hand dealt to them.>much more temperate climate than Brazil >could have had coastal access to the Atlantic and pacific if they’d taken the south cone>could have taken Uruguay and at least parts of Paraguay>massive European migration>tons of resources>fails in spite of all this
>>18289157The most unique thing Argentina had going for it was that it was a single-party pseudo-dictatorship. Rather than a normal dictatorship.Fate threw that back at them by giving them Perón, though.
>>18289157Anon, it was a pretty sizeable migration and unique in the region, 500K Irish, 100K Anglos and Scots, another 100K Welsh... IIRC it was the largest British community outside of the English-speaking world, which is significant. They were also quite influential in the history of the country, since it was one of the oldest migrations. Many towns with English or Welsh names.But it was obviously dwarfed by Italians, Spanish, French, Germans, Poles, Ottoman minorities (Syrian and Lebanese Christians, mostly), Swiss, Croats, etc. The immigration to Argentina was mostly Catholic-leaning. >>18289159Calling the PAN a one-party dictatorship is oversimplification and bs.It was a republic with a (very limited) franchise. But there was separation of powers, free press, a legal opposition, ideas were debated in Congress and there were orderly transitions of power. It's just that the elections weren't representative of anything but the upper classes. But even as early as 1904 the first Socialist parlamentarian in the whole Americas (Alfredo Palacios) was elected, so it certainly wasn't any sort of one party state. This gradual process of reform ended with universal (male) franchise being established in 1916 which meant the transition to a full democracy, around the same time most Western countries were doing it. And that worked well for a while too, until the Great Depression.It was certainly more orderly than the military coups and one-man dictatorships and strongmen that ruled in other parts of the continent. But in 1930 Argentina lost this claim to exceptionalism, conservatives had expected that people would keep voting for them under universal suffrage because they believed they were doing a great job, but the middle classes chose the centrist UCR instead. Theyy couldn't deal with being locked out of power for 14 years and chimped out. And so it went from being one of the more stable countries to becoming one of the least stable countries in the Cold War.
>>18288919>>18288005I will admit I don't know that much about Brazil.Just that 1888 to abolish slavery was very late.But it did avoid a disastrous civil war.I don't know anything about the social dynamics so maybe you are right and the Emperor did a good job.Brazilian government was also very stable during the monarchy.
>>18289312How come you didn't add Uruguay and Paraguay?, they also had received a ton of germans and italians immigrants
>>18289338I didn't make the pic. If I did, I would have added them.Uruguay had basically the same migration patterns as Argentina. Uruguay is to Argentina what New Zealand is to Australia.Paraguay didn't have that much of a significant migration. But it did receive a large amount of Germans.There was some weird settlement project called New Germania being promoted there.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nueva_Germania
The collapse of Western Rome was basically 80% Gaiseric, 20% everything else... Yet he's completely forgotten today, why?
>>18283488Vandal women were a vessel for Hunnic seed
>>18287467Or you know, the people minting the coins were Latin so they used the Latin version of his name?
>>18284631>There was no emperor controlling Rome, and therefore the Roman Empire ceased to be.
>>18287820This post reek of cope
>>18287820In denial
I’m going to post this every day until you remember it
>>18288091
>>18288091I feel very sorry for you
WE REMEMBER SREBRENICA
>>18288328>>18288296Gay
So some literally who e-celeb put up a video bashing Disney Adults, but he made an interesting argument about 15 minutes in that they qualify as a religious cult, spelling out the similarities between Disney and the Catholic Church.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjmQK_DGWgsDoes Disney really qualify as a religion now?
>>18283298There isn't a precise definition of it, so it can range from>a person over the age of 18 who's a fan of Disney mediato>a person over the age of 18 who goes to Disney parks regularlyto>a person over the age of 18 who suffers from arrested emotional development and just happens to be a Disney fan
>>18283236What a waste of time watching this video was.
>>18286594>more obeseThis one I doubt. Takes a lot to walk around Disney land
>>18288557Tbf I don't think anyone is counting>a person over the age of 18 who's a fan of Disney mediaas a Disney adult, probably more the bottom two. It'd be like saying anyone who likes any form of anime over the age of 18 is a weeb. I think compulsive spending/consooming on the Disney habit is a large part of what makes one a Disney adult. My aunt is one, they go to Disney yearly, their house is filled with Disney knickknacks, and she's always gushing about the latest blockbuster (and paying off credit cards with other credit cards...)
>>18288557I'm an adult who enjoys going to Disneyland but I wouldn't really consider myself a Disney adult, in fact, if I didn't know a guy who knows a guy who works there and can get me in for free I'd probably never go there. I go maybe 10 times a year at most and it's all "free", which I put in quotes because everything in the park is overpriced to hell anyways. I think a Disney adult would probably be someone who goes to the parks more than once a year, but pays to get in, because you'd have to be out of your mind to want to pay the insane ticket price more than once a year to get into the park, I don't even know how much tickets are now, I think it's somewhere around $200
He knows the patterns of people and politics right? Why haven't you seen a history fan taking over the world?
>>18288986I miss him so much
>>18288926Technically Julius Caesar is a historian. The books he wrote were meant to be treated as historical documents, hence why he wrote in 3rd person.Also several US presidents were historians, mainly Teddy, Wilson, Dwight and Kennedy.
>>18288926It's like asking why car journalists don't own car companies.
>>18288926almost all leaders in 1930s were history nerds.Yes, including Mussolini and Ataturk.
Historians are famously shit at understanding both politics and people.Real life is not LOGH.
Feminists don't bark about foid empowerment due the fact that she supposedly killed Native Americans. History says she was captured during a raid by Native Americans who killed her newborn and 27 other colonists. She managed to kill and scalp 10 Native Americans and escape... wow! To what extent is this realistically true? My conservative professor in college spent almost 20 minutes talking about how brave she was and ended with a catchy phrase that when you mess with children, women become lions that even men don't dare to touch. But is that really true?
>>18289203>>18289231IdkPerhaps something phenomenal happened to this woman maybe she really did kill someone or escape, but I doubt it was as glorious as WifeGuys makes it seem, and I don't think 10 is a reasonable number. Remember that stories like this were often fabricated or exaggerated during the colonial period.
>>18289231>>18289238You're assuming she killed them in a fair fight. It would be easy as fuck for her to get 10 kills creeping from teepee to teepee in the night slitting the throats of sleeping men.
>>18289246That's more plausible, but 10 men? Especially with those rudimentary weapons? Anyway, I just think this story is too embellished.
lol another attempt at women trying to portray themselves as the kings of the jungle because muh children.Its the Iliad and its protective mommy references all over again.Barf.
>>18289203>women become lions that even men don't dare to touchHahahahah
Why do whites/wignats worship native americans/east eurasians but at the same time hate latinos/south/central americans who are half native american/east eurasian ?
>>18287281Southerners often tell their kids they descent from a "Cherokee princess"
>>18287224>whites/wignats worship native americansIf they worship them they have a funny way of showing it considering Natives are all but extinct in the US
>>18287339If you make a thoughtful, intelligent OP you won't farm as many (You)s
>>18287224Brownoid airs his personal inane grievances out on the History and Humanities board part 12736128
>>18287224>why does x group do y do but at the same time do z >x group is whoever you want to complain about>y is something literally no one does>z is an attempt at creating a logical opposite of yIs this from a script or something? Is anyone on here even human anymore?
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky, not a single time. I never asked anyone to lie. These allegations are false. Now I need to go back to doing the work of the American people."
>>18287627Clinton single handedly blocked American oil firms from investing into Iran by lying about WMD's.
>>18288743Yes but the orange is worse and way more violent
Clinton was hitting this while Obama was getting pegged by his bull.
>>18288891>y wud he block investment in a country the State Department has blacklisted as a state sponsor of terrorismI wonder.
>>18288365The justification for the war was that Saddam was a threat to the united states, so we had to take him out. Even if he had WMDs he was not.
>one of the most important far-right figures >worked as a glowie for the Soviets Huh?
>>18287550inshallah
>>18288079and that's a good thing
>>18288108>capital is Damascus instead of Mecca or even Baghdad
>>18287449The SJW movement was founded by feds with ties to Operation Paperclip's literal nazis. ("Was Jonestown a CIA Medical Experiment?") I'm not entirely certain the modern rehash- which really took off on tumblr and reddit- both sites known for anonymity, and the latter of which has ties to Ghislaine Maxwell- wasn't also some kind of fed op.
>>18287550>>18287449Eventually you get redpilled enough and realize that the neocons were basically right about everything.
>a drug is responsible for 30 million dead europeansReally makes you think.
>>18289043I, too, watched the Tiger panzer movie, it was cool
>>18289043Actually learned about this through this book where the protagonist is an addict
>If you put a bunch of civilians into a military vehicle and blow it up, it's not a war crime, since these civilians were inside a legal target.>But if you shoot civilian workers at an arms factory or a military base, it's a war crime, since you were targeting noncombatants.Make it make sense!
>>18287559you are illiterate
>>18288097This front line reporter who was actually in Donetsk in the 2010s mentions it in this video.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Icd17gVHh1U&pp=ygUcRm91cnRoIHJlaWNoIHJ1c3NlbGwgYmVudGxleQ%3D%3DYou’ll just call him a propagandist but he was there fighting and saw it with his own eyes.
>>18287634>>18287622Unarmed workers are not innocent, since they're still supporting the war effort. They're absolutely moral targets.
>>18288774I think there is a difference between bombing a weapons factory knowing there will be high casualties among the workers, and storming the factory and machine gunning the workers. In the former the goal was disabling the machines and the death of the workers was proportional to military necessity. In the latter there was no military necessity. The workers posed no threat and the means of war production could have been smashed without killing them.If we remove the concept of proportionality from war then there is no difference between war and genocide.
>>18288774Farmers too since they're feeding the soldiers.
>Pharao has always fought against niggers and jews
>>18288924it's clearly about indians
>>18289010Regardless Im not familiar. Got any sources on that?
>>18286631I realized that Canaan always needed a foreign leader to be pacified.I realized that the Hyksos were proto-Jews who wanted to live in a lawless, warlord-filled chaos.I realized why the Jews violently rejected Roman and Roman-Christian law: they hate being restrained by law.I realized that Jews still hate law and order.
>>18288872>HaplogroupMaybe LatinoZoomer really was an aryan who'd even Hitler would blush for...>>18287786Thats certainly a shotgun nostril, inflated lip nigger, but the other enemy depicted is almost certainly a Syrian or whatever power controlled tbe Levant at the time. The jews were always a weak people never really challenging any empire, maybe except the romans, but even then that was swatted away once a true Legion came to discipline the jew.
>>18286631Fundamentally Egyptian kings were really more responsible for the subjugation of the Egyptian people than the subjugation of Egypt's enemies.
>"God's love is infinite" (i.e. unconditional)>you have to believe in Jesus or else you will burn in magic lava for ever and ever
>>18277843By choosing not to believe in Christ and clinging to sin, YOU are making the conscious choice to reject God. God isn't condemning you for anything, you are condemning yourself.
>>18287508You do realize that eunuch is meant to represent celibacy in this context, right? Jesus isn't actually telling you to cut your genitals off, he's telling you to abstain from sexual immorality.
>>18281659>venial sinEnjoy Hell
>>18283142It’s not. We destroy ourselves as we age through basic movement because we were never meant to live past 30
>>18289384Lemt me guess... Orthodox? Otherwise known as the 'head-up-own-ass' sect?
