How can a regime last for 1000 years?
>>18177436By being decentralized af
>>18177436By not letting women vote or change the social structure.
>>18177438This. Then when the collapse happens it's easier to rebuild it than to try and piece together a massive bloated bureaucracy of centralized state structure.
>>18177436By being Rome or China minus some of the bullshit
>>18177438>>18177441>>18177446>>18177447I want the same Ideology, same book and same way of governance
>The CPC destroyed chinese history!!111!!>Meanwhile the Cultural Revolution was literally a Legalist revolution in which hundreds of millions of Legalist texts were printed and handed out by the party to people, the most popular texts of the cultural revolution wereThe Book of Lord Shang and Han Feizi and Criticize Lin, Criticize Confucius.>Mao himself was a Classical poet (considered one of the greatest of Chinese history) who was a massive Cao Cao/Wei fag.When Deng game in, he asserted Daoism as the core "chinese" aspect of Chinese Socialism>“Observe calmly, secure our position, cope with matters calmly, conceal our capacities and bide our time, be good at maintaining a low profile, and never take the lead.” - Deng XiaopengThis is a classic expression of Daoist thought from the Tao Te Ching.Deng Xiaopeng also noted that the theory of contradiction and dialectics is a key component of Daoist philosophy.>“Cross the river by feeling the stones,”>“It doesn’t matter whether a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice,” Other Daoist quotes often used by Deng.I love Western narratives on China because it's clear as fuck that Westoids do not understand China, how much history matters in China, and how important the role of Classical Chinese thought plays on Chinese Governance even with the Communist Party.Not a shocker though from brainlet Westoids who consistantly rank history as the most pointless and boring subject in polling.
>>18177334>the most popular texts of the cultural revolution were>The Book of Lord Shang and Han Feizi and Criticize Lin, Criticize ConfuciusThe Little Red Book you lying retard. sage.
>>18177334Chinese history is just like western history. Lots of tricks and backstabbing but also gentlemanly honor based people of higher ideals.There are really lots of similarities with thier history. Cultural cross pollination must have been more prevalent than we give it credit for.
>>18177334Chink Chink Chinaman you say? Never heard of her.
>>18177334It sounds more like they're just capable of cherrypicking certain historical events to 'prove' muh 6,000 years of unbroken tradition.As the other anon says, can they actually name a single Tang emperor?
>>18177334>I love Western narratives on China because it's clear as fuck that Westoids do not understand China, how much history matters in China, and how important the role of Classical Chinese thought plays on Chinese Governance even with the Communist Party.This is from the Age of Extremes by Hobsbawm.
>Seeing the lightest and gayest purple was then most in fashion, he would always wear that which was the nearest black; and he would often go out of doors, after his morning meal, without either shoes or tunicWhat the fuck was his problem?
You have no reason not to believe in God.
>>18177344Suvivorship bias. We’re only here to debate this because the planet happens to be perfect. Was it extremely rare, almost impossibly so? Yes. But you wouldn't exist to talk about it right now if he wasn't.
>>18173375You can only use this argument in bad faith. The moment you consider that 99% of religious people have nothing to do with maintaining systems of institutional control, and that religion does not preclude violence: you open yourself up to countless logical criticisms that overwhelmingly disprove your argument.
>>18177410Indeed, if He wasn't perfect I wouldn't exist. Thanks for agreeing with me.
>>18177419Don't tell me that the universe altered When you find out how he gets paid
>>18177419BRAAAAAAAAP
Is Hitler worship fading now that European nationalists are getting acquainted with Generalplan Ost and Hitler's views on East Euros?
This is how Zoomer Historian addressed this in a recent interview >"What role do ideology and politics play in shaping “official” history?">ZH: It depends on the era, but obviously my channel has been rather World War 2 focused and in that case the entire history is ideological and political. Britain destroyed her Empire and essentially destroyed herself in the process of fighting that war and ever since we’ve had to tie ourselves in knots to defend our actions. I think addressing that topic directly cuts right to the heart of the issue if we are to make any changes to the current suicidal course we are on. Some disagree with this, I know Keith Woods fairly recently wrote a big piece on the topic on his substack. I couldn’t disagree more. The entire worldview which we are meant to operate under springs from that exact conflict. It needs to be confronted. This does not mean that we need to make Hitler a saint or justify everything he did, but we need to confront the issue and drop the cope. Anti-White political types will never ever stop labelling Nationalists Hitler or National Socialists and so there is no use in allowing them to forever remain these irredeemable bogeymen. Hitler needs to be Napoleonised. People can feel strongly either way but there needs to be nuance so the Fuhrer’s very name isn’t the embodiment of evil otherwise we’ll never get anywhere. The Kaiser and Napoleon have both already had to overcome this to a lesser extent.
>>18170333no, considering russia's latest aggresion against europe it is increasing.
>>18171070>wizened up
>>18175370What the moron doesnt realise is that hes making it worse by being so vehemently biased and filling his videos with obvious propaganda. It only infects the debate more and make nuance more difficult.There are strong arguments to be made that challenge the current popular narrative but to go at it the way ZH does is retarded because it's so easy to tear down his position as seen here on /his/ whenever one of his faggot viewers tries to make his argument but cannot rationally defend it when tested in a debate.So yeah, hes a retard and a narcistist and an autist, and he does more harm than good. Fuck him.Also he couldnt rationally explain how ww2 ended the British empire since far more compelling arguments can be made that the British empire was already in rapid decline prior to ww2 and was inevitable at that point.All he can do is parrot whatever Irving says but he has no clue himself.
>>18172388they were all genocidal, but nazis also wrote in euphemisms about genocide, apparently the SS draft that didn't survive (the one Himmler and Wetzel were writing about) was the most explicit about the sort of mass killing it would entail
If you could only choose about 15 pre-21st century wars to read about for the rest of your life, what would they be?Both World Wars are broken up into fronts and theaters; for example the Pacific Theater of WWII counts as a separate war than the North African campaign, which is a separate war to the Eastern Front, etc.MASSIVE bonus points if you can bring yourself lower than 15.For me,>King Philip's War>American Civil War>Boshin War>Satsuma Rebellion>Serbian campaign (1914)>1936 Palestine Revolt>Pacific War>1948 Arab-Israeli War>Six-Day WarComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18176664Code?
>>18176664Newhalfs ass
>>18176664North AfricaEastern FrontPacificItalyNormandyWest Front WWIEast Front WWIPunic War 2Russo-Ukro warAlexander's ConquestPeloponnesian warGallic War30 years warNapoleonic War (the Finale)Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18176664>Egyptian Conquest of Canaan (15th century BC)>Judgeship of Deborah>Bronze Age Collapse>Peloponnesian War>Second Punic War>Gallic Wars>First Crusade>Fall of Constantinople>American Revolutionary War>American Civil War>WWI Western Front>WWII Pacific TheaterI’m surprised there aren’t more ancient wars in these lists, especially pre-Greece. There aren’t many surviving records but they are of great interest and significance.
>>18176664Greek-Persian Wars Peloponnesian War Alexander's Conquest of Persia Diadochi WarSecond Punic War Caesar's Civil War Seven Years WarNapoleonic War WW1 You can keep the change
>what if the limes germanicus was made out of germans?
>>18177103The cities of Lesbos were always too busy fighting each other to ever do anything cool.
>>18177103Because empires are masculine, tranny.
>>18177217Kinda like how real lesbians are always too busy beating each other to ever be hot
>>18177169So did moms abandoned you with trans lesbian?
>>18177103Because I can physically overpower 99% of women and I’m just a manlet that occasionally works out.
>>216952028Did the ussr puprosefully fuck up ethnic borders within the ssr's out of spite so that if it collapsed it would cause conflict?
>>18176969Most Armenians came after the establishing of the republics borders. Azerbaijan benefitted by being given special attention by Stalin as they were specifically conquered. Stalin saw every census and came to the correct consensus that the Azeris were far more populous and spreadout than the Armenians, Armenian colonists doesnt change the reality that the southern Caucuses was never the Armenian homeland as Anatolia was.
>>18177129Why flimsily force yourself into believing you belong to a foreigner's race when even if it were true (it isn't), you would still be categorized at the literal bottom of the White totem poll and never be accepted into their party regardless? It's a really pathetic and self-loathing way to be and you know it.
>>18177149The South Caucasus was Armenian but the Safavid and ottoman deportations, depopulation and qizilbash settlement caused many of the provinces to be turkified by the time the Russians arrived in the 1820. Most of what is Azerbaijani too was inhabited by Iranian speaking people who were turkified by the Turkish Shia settlement of the 1500s
>>18176969Why didn't they just transfer the Armenians from Artsakh and the Azeris from Nakhchivan? It's not like the Soviets don't have a track record of forcefully relocating entire ethnic groups.
>>18177145I never called you a Turk. And it's not a complete misunderstanding. Contemporary Islamophobia, immigration hysteria, and insecurity aside, the "turk turks" as you call them were Hitler's favorite soldiers.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azerbaijani_SS_volunteer_formations>It was the version of woke back then. No, it was not. Soviets never sat down and said "well the turks are heckin counter cultchya muslims so they can have this land..". That's just something you made up in your head.
I've finally cracked the code.
>>18177047ahem, black isnt a colour.
>>18177132>black isnt a colour.But queer is?
>>18177128>Christianity is for jews and niggersI never knew the Greeks and Romans were nijjers.
Papists are black. Read pic rel.
>>18177153https://www.ruckmanism.org/ufoTL;DR this book is just wild schizo stuff
What do you call an Imperial Chinese prince with a taboo secret?A GAY MING!
pootis cock in OP!
>>18177226How do imperial chinese name their children?They drop silverware down the stairs>ping ting dong wang!
they ate people
>>18177241
making their own children spend almost every waking hour working in hellish factories and mines was by far one of the most satanic and evil things white civilization has ever done
>>18176884This is how it's been for thousands of years. Society didn't start infantilizing children until only a few decades ago. Even as recently as the 1980s most kids were expected to have a summer job at the very least, from the moment they turned 14.
>>18176884If they didn't live in the city they'd be working the fields. It was a different time.
>>18176941Elites would never do this with their own children.
>>18177367Elites send their sons to elite schools where they get buggered and bugger as their initiating humiliation ritual instead.
>>18177367Elites children are often incompetent retards who's parents don't want them to work at all. In the past successful peoples children were expected to expand on thier fathers achievements. Now thier fathers greedy board members prefer to push offspring out of the company entirely. Even if they still own it. There are some elites who put thier kids to work. These are often the ones who are successful.
Niggers with machetes killed between half a million and 800 thousand people in Rwanda over the course of 100 days, are you gonna tell me a series of industrial death camps that bussed people into gas chambers by the hundreds can't beat that in the course of a year? They didn't put them in 80 an hour, it was hundreds at a time.>well I just don't see itYeah a guy shielding his eyes won't see what's directly in front of his face.>a tiny labor campTreblinka wasn't a labor camp, it was a straight up death camp. It had facilities to house its staff and kill the undesirables and that's it, nobody stuck around there because if you arrived there you were gonna be dead within 12 hours. Auschwitz Berkinau was a hybrid labor and death camp that housed its inmates. Treblinka wasn't. It was purpose built to be a death factory.>well I just don't believe it because I'm a /pol/trannyNo shit. Just going "well I don't believe it" doesn't mean shit because the vast majority of historical analysis disagrees with you.>but zoomers don't believe itYes they do. One poll doesn't equate to shit when the majority of polls taken reflect otherwise.
>>18175459>>18175507Stormtrannies once again in charge of knowing a basic timeline of the holocaust before screeching about it.
>>18175436It is. The Tutsi are a Nilo-Cushitic population which survived the Bantu expansion that somehow came to rule over the Hutu and other Bantu ethnic groups across Burundi and Rwanda. in the 15th century. They became essentially feudal lords, 15% of the population, residing over the Hutu, the other 85%. Insert Western Colonialism, and the Hutu democratically elect a Hutu ruler, the Tutsi, fearing retribution, flee, the Hutu president is then assassinated by Tutsi forces, the sketchy "genocide" occurs where the Tutsi, and basically the USA fully backed the Tutsi. Now the Tutsi rule uncontested in Rwanda and raid the Congo, more Bantu, for resources periodically. They have killed millions.https://www.gnxp.com/WordPress/2020/01/18/the-belgians-did-not-invent-the-hutu-and-tutsi-ethnic-groups-who-have-different-origins/https://www.gnxp.com/WordPress/2019/04/11/tutsis-are-genetically-very-similar-to-the-masai/https://www.gnxp.com/WordPress/2019/09/23/tutsis-are-less-nilotic-than-the-maasai/https://www.unz.com/article/hotel-propaganda/https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-rwanda-genocide/
>>18175507The Einsatzgruppen did just that. Shot the Jews of Eastern Europe (and Western Russia) and just threw them into a hole. Same with gypsies, homos, and any Eastern Euro they just didn't like the look of.People saying the logistic numbers of the holocaust don't add up are not considering that most were simply executed by the Einsatzgruppen. They advanced slightly behind the front lines and liquidated the Jews as the Wehrmacht was conquering new ground.These numbers typically aren't considered by Holocaust deniers, who try to do the math as to how many possibly could have been killed from gassing in the camps.
>>18176031>they did just thatThey recorded every event like this, it doesnt add up to even a million.>people are not consideringThey are, they recognize the jews at Babi Yar were not millions, like some of the survivors claimed, but tens of thousands at most.>liquidated the jewsnope.They were in charge of security, which meant hard and fast executions of partisans and those assisting partisans, both sides did this and israel does this today, as does Ukraine - two states granted moral superiority by our current moral order in one way or another.>holocaust deniersYou mean people who are correct?>gassing in campsgassing in camps?No, historians are trying to square a circle with the gassing meme.There isnt any evidence gas chambers were used as a form of mass execution, this is actually a huge problem for the Auschwitz historiography dept.Have you ever been to Auschwitz? I have, they readily admit the huge problem the lack of evidence is.
>>18175979The bantus are the inferior race they should be ruled over
Did he really go to China or make it all up
>>18174585No. His starship crashed there and he had to walk back to the Middle East to get in contact with the last of the Anunnaki to get a lift home. Got taken captive by agents of the Vatican at the command of the Markab and that’s when he wrote a little doodle that ended up getting popular.
>>18174585The original bald & bankruptWish they had cameras back then
>>18174585He probably compiled second hand accounts given how unaccurate some are compared to Ibn Battuta's first hand accounts on China
>>18176620This. I forget the name but there were a few other guys going over there before/around the same time as him.
>>18174585For a while they thought he made it up but in the last 10 years they found some chinese text that talked a out some weird eccentric guy from the west they think was Marco Polo
>cuban sugar planters worked their slaves to death because it was cheaper to import new one every ten years than to supply them with adequate living conditions Doesn't seem very nice
>>18177019>there was a spanish floridan settlement that gave runaway slaves freedom, which the american colonists destroyedbased Spain they believe black lives matters centuries before St Floyd lost his breath and made Americans woke of it
>>18177019>which the american colonists destroyedThey also permanently fucked up North Carolina and Georgia through South Carolina and Virginia forcing slavery on them. N. Carolina was initially settled by poor whites fleeing Virginia in the search of farmable land and I think Georgia was initially founded under Oglethorpe with slavery banned outright until the inbred rice-farming nigger-lovers of S. Carolina's aristrocracy chimped out over it. The last Dutch governor of New Netherlands (New York), Pieter Stuyvesant also had only just started opening Manhattan to a potential slave trade when the Brits took it over in 1664. He sent what few blacks he could north on the Hudson and gave them some land just before relinquishing power, likely because he knew what the Brits would do.
>>18177019Chattel slavery is a buzzword invented by browns and their aristocratic allies to justify their own slaveryI’d rather be the biggest nigger in America than get by balls chopped off by Ahmed, yiss’suh
>>18177019Spain had slave markets in Spain itself at the time of Columbus something not seen in England. And chattel slavery is simply the idea that the children of slaves remain the property of the owner, something very common historically and something the Romans practised
>>18177019Spain had slavery in the peninsula and when they abolished it, instead of giving them freedom and baptizing them, they sold them to the T*rks.
How did Spanish American countries go from about 70% Indian, 15% European, 15% mixed at the time of independence, to basically 90% mixed today?What changes did they go through? How did the mixed population come to be? What happened to the Indians? What happened to the white population?Perhaps a more important question: what does it mean to be mixed? Are they a genuinely new people born from the mixture of Africans, Europeans and Indians? Or are they in origin the European settlers, whose genepool has been altered over generations of race-mixing, basically slowly rendering the white population mixed?
>>18176133Read or ask your preferred AI to resume "La raza cósmica" from José Vasconcelos. It's explained there.
>>18176133Being Mixed or Mestizo in Latam is a matter of two aspects to it, the racial and the culturalAs you said, the racial aspect comes from the racemixing of the indigenous population with the European settlers and African slaves over time, which was aided by the waves of migrations both from Europe and Asia to Latam, and also from the rural zones to the cities.However, the second aspect is the cultural, as being Mestizo is not just describing someone being of mixed blood, but also being a member of the newly independent national identities of Mexico, Chile and so forth, without any ties to either Europe or the old native people's. You might be majority native blooded, but if you have zero knowledge about native languages or customs, speak spanish exclusively, and have a completely westernized lifestyle, then for all purposes you became a mestizo in practice.
>>18176133Most of the newly independent nations encouraged racemixing after independence in order to create a monoculture, before independence most of these nations had Spanish cities with a totally native hinterland which lacked much commonality with the cities and thus it was difficult to get them to see themselves as forming a single national identity. In many cases the natives did not even speak Spanish and most of them followed their own chiefs and traditional rulers alongside the catholic priests, in fact in Mexico they had "republics of Indios" where these native governments were formalised and Spaniards were banned from marrying the women of these republics. So upon independence you had a population speaking dozens of different languages having different cultures all while you are trying to create a united national identity. The solution many states had to this was to encourage intergration of the seperate populations through intermarriage, for instance in Paraguay the government actually banned Spaniards marrying within their own race, this had the effect of weakening both populations differences as marriage is most effective way to assimilate, gradually the Spanish cultures gained much more dominance than under the actual Spanish empire since they were the wealthier group in these new couplings. Another factor is the new migration coming from Europe encouraged by these new regimes which further diminished the native population in terms of percentage of the population. So ironicially the independence movement actually weakened the natives as a distinct group by assimililating them to the Spanish population and the European percentage of the blood is actually much higher there today than on the eve of independence.
>>18176133demographic boom
>>18177262This is all true, and that's the most ironic part of the Hispanidad meme: without the "evil" and "masonic" Latin American independence movements, Spanish would never have become the world's second most spoken language.