>>18312007https://desuarchive.org/his/thread/18312007/During the reign of Vietnamese monarch Lê Thánh Tông from 1460-1497 (Hồng Đức era) in Lê dynasty Vietnam, Lê Thánh Tông first banned self-castration of Vietnamese men in 1464.Han Chinese men on ships who were blown towards Vietnam's coast as castaways were arrested by Vietnamese coastal patrols.The Vietnamese selected the young Han Chinese men for castration to become eunuch slaves.Over 100 Han Chinese young men were known to be castrated by the Vietnamese after the Ming government found out in 1472 from some people who escaped and reported over 100 Chinese men were castrated and still in Vietnam after their ships were blown off course.The Ming government again had another report in 1499 from a Chinese eunuch named Wu Rui (born in Wenchang, Hainan) who escaped in 1497 after he had been enslaved in Vietnam's palace for decades after he was castrated as a young man on a ship that blew off course. The 12 older Hainanese Chinese men who were with him were enslaved on military colony farms (đồn điền, tuntian) in newly conquered land from Champa to do agricultural work.The majority of eunuchs in the Vietnamese palace in the capital Thăng Long (Hanoi) in the Hồng Đức era were young Han Chinese men.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18376150She's Vietnamese.Japanese royal women didn't have eunuchs but Vietnamese royal women all had eunuchs.Unfortunately for Chinese men.
>>18374271Viet
>>18376274>>18376279Black teeth.
>>18375946Do you find their black teeth hot too?
>>18374271Did one Vietnamese castrator castrate over 100 Han Chinese men, or were there multiple Vietnamese castrators doing the castrations?What did the Vietnamese do with the penises and testicles after emasculating them?
>The foulest Babylonian custom is that which compels every woman of the land to sit in the temple of Aphrodite and have intercourse with some stranger at least once in her life. Many women who are rich and proud and disdain to mingle with the rest, drive to the temple in covered carriages drawn by teams, and stand there with a great retinue of attendants. But most sit down in the sacred plot of Aphrodite, with crowns of cord on their heads; there is a great multitude of women coming and going; passages marked by line run every way through the crowd, by which the men pass and make their choice. Once a woman has taken her place there, she does not go away to her home before some stranger has cast money into her lap, and had intercourse with her outside the temple; but while he casts the money, he must say, "I invite you in the name of Mylitta". It does not matter what sum the money is; the woman will never refuse, for that would be a sin, the money being by this act made sacred.What do you think of this practice? Was it good for society since it would humble the various women and make her a better citizen.
>>18380369No wonder the holy ones wanted to dash Babylonian children against the rocks.
>>18380369>since it would humble the various womenWomen nowadays are compelled by society to take multiple strange cocks before it becomes acceptable for them to settle down and yet they are the least humble and worst citizens they've ever been through history
>>18380369Nice tranime whore.
>>18380369replace temple for a bar and its almost the same shit nowadays
What is legitimately the most backwards ass religion?
Neo-Paganism is probably the most backwards in every single way since the practice entails animist tribal bullshit and random backwater European superstitions and on top of all this it's a contrived movement that is hardly even organic to begin with>>18381014Atheism isn't a religion anymore than Theism is a religion.
Atheism
>>18381232Ben Shapiro is Jewish and you schizos told me I should do the opposite of what Jews say
>>18381235Poltards were actually a psyop by the Kind of Judea Mr Epstein himself, they pretend to be a real opposition to jews but are actually serving israeli interests
>>18381235So you’re gonna take TJ’s advice?
The ideas seem pretty straightforward:>People work to self-realize their needs, ambitions, desires etc>Work is organized in a set of relations and gives rise to class>When the workplace's organization becomes detrimental to self-realization, the workers have incentives to overcome itSo how did these ideas transform into the nightmare that was the USSR and Maoist China ? It seems odd that someone could get the idea that every decision needs to be centralized into one absolute dictator with complete control over the economy from marxism. Similarly why didn't they think of reforming their economic model once weakness started showing ? It paradoxically somewhat proves Marx right too
It failed because of the economic calculation problem and because of war communism etc…
I don't want my fair share. I want more and I will find a way to get more. This is why communism will always fail.
>>18377406>never ever worked in a single day of their lifes, just as that parasite Karl MarxWhy do people keep repeating this? Is it just bait?Marx had a job working as a journalist and editor. He couldn't keep a job because of his controversial political writings.
>>18380910Have fun with not even getting your fair share in capitalism the vast majority of the time (perhaps never in your life), for the slight chance in your life of pleasing your company oligarch owners and moving up.>>18380696Economic calculation problem can be solved easily via computers. The Soviets did their best with what they had, and developed advanced numerical methods used in math. With today’s tech combined with the advanced numerical methods, it’s a non-issue.War communism can be reverted by using China’s policies: instead of having a stranglehold on the capitalists via weaponry, have a stranglehold on them via trade, diplomacy and sheer economic advantage (see Xi Yinping Thought). USSR would probably have gone this way (see Lenin’s post-revolution work and Bukharin), but WW2 and its consequences resulted in them being a lot more paranoid than they would’ve been otherwise.
How does R&D work under a communist system?
>okay government were going to kill 1/3rd the population>ok bossNo but really whats the backstory here
>>18381305and good sources on this. Cambodia is something I am weak on.
>>18380781>whats the backstory hereUSA bombed the shit out of Cambodia because Viet Cong forces were crossing through there. Khmer Rouge lived through airstrikes every day for years, went out of it thinking they were blessed by the gods and invincible, then began murdering Vietnamese and any Cambodians who were suspected of sympathizing with Vietnam. Also, while they were doing this USA accused Vietnam of committing genocide when they invaded Cambodia to stop the genocide.>>18381337Blowback season 5
>>18380812you're trans btw
>>18380781>let's kill our intellectuals and revert back to ooga booga farmers>Finally, our communist utopia is achieved>*gets raped by their crossdressing neighbor decades later*
>>18381343trannies own you, blud
Stalin was both a huge faggot and a tiny manlet. A deranged psychopath who literally tried to quit and ran away from his duties to cry in the early days of Barbarossa:>After the fall of Minsk, Stalin was completely depressed mentally. Weeping, he made a statement: “The war began, it is developing catastrophically. Lenin left us this great proletarian Soviet state, and we have pissed it away." After which he announced his refusal to lead the state, got into the car and drove to the nearest summer cottage. Some time after this, Beria consulted with Molotov, Kaganovich and Voroshilov, and they decided to go to Stalin in order to return him to activity, to use his name and abilities to organize the country's defense. When they came to his country house, they saw in the face of Stalin, that he was very scared, having decided that members of the Politburo had come to arrest him.>According to Mikoyan’s recollections, he “pressed into a chair” (so that the author had a thought that Stalin was waiting for his arrest), looked inquiringly at those who came and asked: "Why have you come?" Mikoyan’s appearance and his question seemed strange: after all, according to Mikoyan, Stalin himself had to convene the Politburo. On behalf of everyone, Molotov said that it is necessary to concentrate power so that everything is resolved quickly, so that the country is put on its feet. Such a body should be headed by Stalin. Stalin looked in surprise, did not raise any objections, said "Well."
>>18381363Me on the right
>>18381359Imagine Eva Braun doninating Stalin
>>18381400Sexually or militantly?
>>18381406Sexually
>>18381359Stalinxisters . . not like this
>So, Hitler. Once you kill all the Jews... what would you do next?
>>18381414Obviously he would focus on consolidating power in his new sphere of influence without being undermined by Allied glownigger efforts. What a waste. I would instead ask the founders of the US what they thought of modern America as described to them.
>>18381414Everything would fall into place naturally
Was the gulf war justified and good foreign policy?
>>18380623Yes. We went in for a clear reason, with a clear time and reason to stop.We went in because Iraq was occupying Kuwait, and we were out as soon as they were no longer occupying. In war and life in general, clearly defined lines are your friends
>>18380623No, it alienated a key ally and made the world less safe for Americans since it increased anti-Americanism in the region.
>>18380623I oppose neoliberalism but I admit yes, this was just and good policy.
>>18380623putting turd-worlders in their place is always good foreign policy
>>18380831shalom
I want to hate him, but I can't.I am British. I identify with the political heritage of this nation; with the likes of Pitt and Burke, of Wellington and Bonar Law, of the pragmatic governance that allowed us to become one of the greatest nations to ever exist (for a time).But I can't bring myself to hate Napoleon. Every time I try to, I find myself in the company of insufferable faggots who seemunable to say WHY they hate him.>he plunged Europe into warWeren't half of those wars declared UPON him? With others being about lessening the ability for others to war France, or to simply build French prestige and wealth-something every fucking nation on earth was trying to do for themselves?>he was a tyrantdidn't he spread (an admittedly inferior) set of laws and practices across Europe that brought an end to the worst parts of feudalism in many places? are we really judging the domestic policies of a man who was at war for almost his entire tenure?>he was a cuckoldhe was frenchI just can't hate him. His story is too fascinating to me, every time I come across people arguing about him all the anti-Napoleon fags seem like the most nitpicky "uhm, acktually" retards on the planet. I've never heard an actual critique of Napoleon that doesn't just sound like unironic directionless coping from a nation he beat at one point or another.>
>>18380558Britain won, so he can't have been that great anyway.
>>18380428He completely ruined Europe and plunged us into eternal debt.
>>18381086no but you don't understand he's *literally moi*
he was a pretty cool guy but he did get an egomaniac streak towards the end. his 'empire' would've collapsed to infighting almost immediately after he died anyway so i wouldn't worry about it.
>>18380552>nappykek is he your boyfriend?
Who was more culturally evil? The Aztec Empire or the Spanish Empire?
>>18380589Cont:In short, 20,000 child sacrifices a year seems like an exaggeration even for that wider, all-of-mesoamerica-aside-from-the-maya grouping that IIRC Zumarraga was actually talking about.As far as the amount of people the Mexica specifically actually sacrificed a year, as I said in >>18380578, I think the figure is probably in the hundreds or thousands. The Huey Tzomnpantli seems to have held around 16,000 skulls (specifically the rack portion, there were also two adjacent skull towers which likely held a few thousand more), based on if you plug in the dimensions of the rack and pole spacing we know from excavations into earlier research like "Counting Skulls: Comment on the Aztec Cannibalism Theory of Harner‐Harris..." which was calculating the amount of skulls racks of different sizes could hold. We don't know how many years of deposits the Huey Tzompantli represents, but if you work off of a few variables (the amount of years the rack took to fill, what proportion of the city's sacrifices went into that rack vs had their skulls deposited elsewhere, etc), then a figure in the mid hundreds to the mid thousands seems the most plausible: EX if you assume the rack took a decade to fill, and the rack represents a full half of the city's sacrifices, then that would imply 3600 sacrifices a year. Not that there's a specific reason to think it took a decade to fill and it represents half the city's sacrifices, that's just an example.Hundred to thousands is an entire order of magnitude of wiggle room, but obviously there's a lot of ambiguity in the variables I outlined. What I do think it shows at least is that the Mexica were probably not sacrificing tens of thousands of people a year, certainly not many tens of thousands: It's quite unlikely IMO that an entire racks worth of skulls were being filled on an annual basisThere's more I could say but I ran out of space again and it's not enough to justify a 4th post so stopping here for now3/3
>>18379962aztecs were more bloody, but they practiced better hygeine
>>18379972To the Aztecs, sacrifice was considered honorable, the Spaniards weren't even worthy of sacrifice
>>18379969Indios today have nothing to do with the cartel you dumb tranny
>>18381354I mean that's not true, we know some Conquistadors that got captured after hostilities broke out ended up being sacrificed
You're no Winston Churchill, what does that mean? I'm bored as fuck. Any other Winston Churchills here?
>>18380342donna you're the best lol
You won't give me you empire and all of your gold for free.
Were Brits the good guys in the American Revolutionary War?
What if Frederick Louis, George III's brother was exiled to America and started his own American empire?
>>18379744Yes. The Brits were the good guys. America and France both got fucked over by their revolutions, which was just judeo-Masonic garbage at its core.
>>18379744both sides were good :)
How humiliating for Brits - they’ve been so degraded, brown people are now taking their side in colonial wars.
>>18379744just look at canada by comparison, a nice, normal, well-developed country that doesn't cause problems or is hated by anyone. tells you everything you need to know.
Why isn't he praised for Liberating the Memelland from Lithuanian fascists?
Zephaniah 1:3-8“I will sweep away both man and beast; I will sweep away the birds in the sky and the fish in the sea— and the idols that cause the wicked to stumble.”“When I destroy all mankind on the face of the earth,”declares YAHU,“I will stretch out my hand against Judah and against all who live in Jerusalem.I will destroy every remnant of Baal worship in this place, the very names of the idolatrous priests—those who bow down on the roofsComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18380803based jew retard
Why did the political sides "swap" on the issue of homosexuality?
>>18380571faggotry
