Spengler already noticed the cracks by the beginning of the 20th century but before that we got a period of time where europeans haven't lost their self-confidence, it was common to see technological breakthroughs and to think they could serve for the betterment of mankind, empires were seen as bringing civilization and pacifying large sections of the world where tribal war, famine and plague were endemic, with works such as the indian rail system and the Suez Cannal being something not just possible but common policy, people still wanted to act in a refined and decent way and sexual degeneracy was seen as what it was, degeneracy to be shunned, cultural and political subversion was still contained to social pariahs and governments promoted high arts, there was social conscience but it was more about loving your country and working for the betterment of your countrymen and the glory of God than feeding parasites and emasculating yourself.All of this was lost with WW1 and WW2 ended with Europe demographically crippled, creativity and technologies stunted, americans promoting forced egalitarian policies and half of the continent occupied by bolshevik, only now, after decades of decay, it appears Europe is finally showing the intention of recovering, being forced, to become more proactive in global matters other than sending an unending stream of money to people of color and importing aliens. And at a cultural level only japanese are still capable to create art in tune with Belle Epoque and wish for a sense of nobility and elegance.Can the Belle Epoque come back? Or will it be crushed by all those enemies Spengler noticed in The Hour of Decision? Do you hate Europe anon?
>>18258427>Was the Belle Epoque the peak of faustian civilization?No, that was the Age of Exploration and the Renaissance.
>>18258427>Can the Belle Epoque come back?The clock only moves forward. Conservatives cannot grasp this simple fact of life.
>>18258427Belle Epoque was the downfall of the west. 99% of all modern degeneracy has its most primitive origin point there.
>>18258447>Dinosaurs before the meteor: You can’t just wind back the clo-ACK
Chatgpt told me that Europe managed to surpass Timbuktu in therms of science late in the 1500s. Is this correct?
Timbuktu was a joke and their "scholars" mainly studied islamic theology.No scientific or technologic breakthrough of any sort happened there.
Even Chat GPT agrees that Mali was a tier lower than Medieval Europe
>>18258367>>18258444>>18258446The Malian Empire is a meme. All of its wealth was based on gold and selling other niggers to Arabs. Honestly it was kinda like the Saudi Arabia or UAE of its day.
What ideas from this prestigious University did other cultures, or that region build upon? Subjects are specified, but what about those subjects did they advance upon?
>>18258454They pioneered termite architecture
>there are still people who think religious texts aren't historical accounts of contact with extraterrestrials
>>>/x/
What happened, historically?
>>18256327For me it's left
>>18256327That's an AI image. Look at the mug of bucket or whatever its supposed to be that's both in front of and behind the foot. Look at the guy in the back who's wearing some kind of strange futuristic sock on one foot. Look at the right arm and the hand on the girl second to the left. Haha and the girl to the right, her right leg is much larger than the left leg.And most damning of all, look at the text on the front of the bus.Boomers and other retards cannot stop falling to AI slop!
>>18256342>Jews didn't exist before the 1980s
Average weight has been increasing at a more or less linear rate since the 1850s
Junk food and reliance on cars
I felt so bad for this little nigga, he didn’t deserve it. He basically played a positive role in the revolution himself. Robespierre was an evil cunt.
>>18258420Robespierre and his people were your typical psychos pretending to be nationalists, they were thugs like Stalin, so of course it ended badly. It would have been cool if french kept their kings like other more rational countries did.
In the bad old days of Jim Crow, Southern states frequently applied capital punishment for non-homicidal rape but nearly all such instances involved an assault by a black male upon a white female, and Virginia was no exception to the rule. The mass execution of the Martinsville Seven in 1951 was the most notorious one as it gained national headlines but wasn't the last time the Old Dominion would do it. Three more black men would be executed for rape by the state and this practice was only formally abolished when the Supreme Court would ban capital punishment for offenses outside first degree rape in the 1970s.On May 5, 1951, only three months after the Martinsville Seven were executed, Albert Jackson, a 23 year old black parolee, accosted a 40 year old white waitress who was walking home from work in Charlottesville. The woman was dragged into an alley off Second Street and raped there. During this assault she fell into a pit and was badly injured. Jackson wasn't finished; he dragged the victim out and forced her to submit to a second act of rape when a beat cop saw him and interrupted him. He initially tried to deny the assault and claimed he was trying to help the woman out of the pit when she fell into it but finally admitted the truth. Jackson pled insanity at his trial but was found guilty and sentenced to death. The state supreme court upheld his sentence and he was executed August 25, 1952.
>>18257055It is funny how they thought police bodycams in particular would usher in an era of white male police accountability, but all it has done is the validation of the nog exhaustion.
>>18257419>all it has done is the validation of the nog exhaustion.
>>18257449He was running to pay, he didn't want to miss a two for none special.
>>18257419especially when cops can just turn the camera off when they want to kick the shit out of you
>>18257881>new cope unlocked
Do possible worlds exist?
>>18258029>but they are not treesHow do you know?
>>18258347Because they do not have the features of trees such as a stem, roots, branches and leaves.
>>18258360Why define a tree that way? Not all trees have branches. What about trees that have their branches cut off? Not all trees have leaves. What about trees in autumn that lose all their leaves?
>>18258363Why define a tree at all? There's a tree with the face of a child with Down's syndrome carved into it, so maybe we should all wear pants on our heads and not go into work next Monday.Or do you have a better idea of how to define a tree?
>>18257089It's a feature of language, like 99.99999% of our concepts
He has a lot of music content blasting white people yet they all still sing his praises and love him, similar to Muhammad Ali (who is also praised by the most hardened white racists) as well as Malcolm X and Tupac.Why are some black historical figures who hated white racists praised by those same racists?
the answer is lovelisten to his last interview. the dude was 100% spiritual
You reduce their beliefs to "hate white people", so it shows you will never get it even if I explain it to you. You likely don't even understand white supremacy either, which is funny considering you browse this website and have seen the same things I have, yet somehow fail to learn anything from it.
>>18258353Tupac literally said "fuck white people", Malcolm X, Marley and Ali all statements attributed to them where they blast white people. If any of these statements were said today by someone like Dr Umar Johnson or Ilhan Omar the white racists would go insane and get Elon Musk and Trump on the case. But these older dead figures are praised by White racists for saying much worse. What's the deal?
>>18257945for the same reason why chuds are "i used to like ratm until they became political"they can seethe over entertainment becoming "woke" and whatnot within the past 10 years or so, but music is probably the one consistent outlet of politics since the 60s, and probably earlierif anything, mainstream music has become more apolitical now than it was in the 80s
Unironically, why do people fall in love? I know it sounds childish but I have felt that thing where you meet someone and just inmediately click. There's no logical explanation, you just meet someone, like them so much and feel weird about them. Why the fuck does this happen? It's so retarded but it feels really good. I know once you get into a relationship it all goes downhill but whatever. That first time you start to like someone is a unique feeling that makes no sense.
>>18258059>calls love retarded>also admits it's the best feeling ever>mogs himself by proving love is a peak biological driver that doesn't give a fuck about your cynical brainlet takeIt makes no sense because it's older than logic. It's the entire reason your dumb ass exists. your ancestors fucked or died alone.
>>18258059People who are in love are dramatically more likely to have more sex with each other and stick around to help each other take care of their offspring, especially during the crucial first years where they are very dependent on adults. That's it, like so many other things it's an evolutionary trick that increases the chance of passing on your genes. Still feels nice though.
To make you pairbond with the person you just fucked, so that you would raise your children together instead of just wandering off.
why do nordics hate ancient syrians while they were more intelligent and wealthy than ancient germanics? Syrians had Apollodorus, Lucian, Ulpian, Posidonius, etc, while white aryan germanics had literally zero known intellectualsancient history is a disgrace to nordics and any of their wewuzzing looks ridiculous
>>18258195let's see some evidence for that
>>18258107>why do nordics hate ancient syriansDo what now? We don't think about you at all you filthy brain rotted self-victimizing spiritual Hindu.In fact are you sure you're not Indian?Stirring up shit between peoples who don't associate with each other sounds very Indian.
Ancient Syrians were Noridcs
>>18258131This
>>18258170>>18258137Elgabalus was pretty much an alpha build muslim and wanted to spread the pre muhammad stages of islam in romeThey have always been like this
Can the work of Otto Dix and similar artists truly be considered art? His creations are demoralizing and ugly, which is contrary to what art should be.
>>18257873The main problem the Nazis and their modern counterparts have with art like this is that it depicts distorted human figures. The Nazis were obsessed with phisical health and said that art like Dix's depict 'cretins' and their officially sanctioned art was mostly idealized, phisically perfect bodies.Which is ironic since one of the big reasons Hitler was never successful as a painter was that he sucked at painting people, so there was also some projection there.
>>18257873you are a stupid subhuman who wants to be fed propaganda slop like marvel movies and nazi sculptures
>>18257921German war hero.
>>18257873Looks like malformed A.I.slop
However, I’m sure this horrible scene depicting grotesqueries purposely meant to outrage and disgust onlookers is actually based and redpilled aryan art.
I’m going to post this every day until you remember it
>>18257406>remember something you didn't know in the first placeNot sure whose a greater idiot between you and the jannies that don't permban you.
>>18257530Age of Empire II Magyars
>>18257406Remember what?
>>18257710Texans freedom from Centralized Mexican tyrant
>>18257406is that the alamo? shitty story
Why were Nazis like that?
>>18258075By the way, feel free to explain how killing a childless 42 year old quasi-nun who was living on a stipend from her aristocrat family is eugenics.
>>18256549He also supported eugenics and culling of populations
>>18257841So crippled people are high functioning members of society?
>>18257578>>18258323There's a gigantic difference between being born a burden and becoming crippled in service to society.The Germans weren't going around sterilizing men who'd been wounded in battle, they were getting rid of useless eaters who had never made any contribution to society and never would.
>>18258048You have to remember this was 20 years before the discovery of DNA. There was no way to rule out what was and wasn't genetically heritable at the time.
This is a Greek commedy mask from 350 BC
>>18258067Giving Blowjob face vs receiving blowjob face
>>18256506I bet it was a pretty funny play.
They groomed children
>>18258096You know that Episthenes scrolls are a hoax?
>>18258080>Soijak face
>97% of human accomplishment since the 14thcentury occured from men born in this region.Murray, 2003.This quote is referring to Western Europe.It comes from Human Accomplishment (2003) by Charles Murray, where he argues that about 97% of notable human accomplishments since the 14th century came from men born in Western Europe.Important context (and why the claim is controversial)Definition of “accomplishment”: Murray counted achievements using Western reference works (encyclopedias, histories of art/science). That heavily favors European figures.Access vs. ability: For most of history, education, publishing, and recognition were concentrated in Europe—especially among men—so accomplishments elsewhere were less likely to be recorded or valued.Exclusion of women and non-Europeans: Structural barriers meant many capable people never had the chance to produce or be credited for work.Timeframe matters: The 14th century onward overlaps with Europe’s colonial expansion, which amplified European influence and record-keeping.Bottom lineThe “97%” figure reflects who had access to institutions and historical recognition, not innate differences between regions or genders.Most historians and social scientists consider the statistic methodologically biased and not a neutral measure of human potential.
>>18257968Seeing Austria separate from Germany will never not annoy me. Constant humiliation ritual for Germans lolAlso it meant strictly science & tech probably. Murray did not one-to-one compare the arts for example. Nor did he look at political/miliary/religious/explorers/etc.
>>18257968>>18257977Oh and also he's the actual statement in the book>>18255553
>>18257977Well, that makes more sense.I still feel like excluding U.S. is extra biased.
>>18255534>actually, the USA and USSR were responsible for <2% of science>also every obscure 16th century English composer was more important than Louis Armstrong
>>18257968You should filter back to 1940ish because a lot of those are actors, sportsmen and other shit nobody care about.
