I have been surprised constantly by the genius of god.The way he balanced the races perfectly so they have their own territories and created a zone where they could all coexist together.It's like starcraft and world of warcraft except in real life.Is it true that a lot of storytelling and games created throughout history are based on the world's races?
>>18252202>>18252214Nonsense, the separation of ethnicity and nationality has always been a hallmark of empires, including european empiresMaybe in a random mudhut stateless society, no one can conceive of more than two types of in-groups because everyone is the same tribeBut in every empire you have multiple ethnicities, all of whom can be subjects of the king/queen/emperor. You gonna tell me a black african auxiliary, a brown sepoy, and a white limey seaman are the same ethnicity? Obviously fucking not, but they can all serve the same empire and speak the queen's English. Not saying they have equal status either, but they do all serve the same "nation" unless you believe empires are supranational organizations in which case you are no different than globohomo shill scum
>>18251554Europeans are genetically half Asian/ANE, so yellow rather than White.
>>18252630bretty good anon
>>18251554This is not true for indians though>short like asians>ugly like blacks>useless at sports, makes ashkenazi jews look athletic in comparison
>>18251657whats with all the american indians on the modern polish border?
Baptists are semi-pelagian. Their theology strictly contradicts the fact that all have sinned, all have fallen short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23). If children are automatically born in a state of innocence, and do not become accountable for their sin until the age of reason (ages 7 or 8), then how could you say that Adam's sin passed onto his descendants? How could you say children are saved by Christ? They would be saved out of their own nature, but this contradicts scripture which clearly says by our nature we are children of wrath (Ephesians 2:3). This denies the fact that we are saved by grace alone! The Baptist tradition, like all Anabaptist heresies, is an anti-grace theology. They are not real Protestants. Become Reformed.
>>18252680Whoever wrote that quote is ignorant and is perpetuating a common misconception, because the KJV didn't use Erasmus' version of the Received text. Whoever wrote that doesn't even seem to know who Stephanus and Beza were, but those men corrected Erasmus' work on the received New Testament text and used many more manuscripts than he did. They also kept Acts 8:37 because it was in their sources as well.>literally one of your ownYou're quoting an unbeliever.>Regardless, I'm not saying the verse is unorthodox anyway and nothing about Acts 8:37 even contradicts anything about infant baptism.Yes it does contradict and overturn the practice as being wholly unbiblical. Similar to how Acts 2:41-42 does as well. Only those who believed were baptized, not all.It's like this time and again in every example. Acts 18:8 for example. He first believed, and then was baptized, according to Acts 18:8. In Acts 16 with the jailer, it says he believed with all his house. And so on. And in Mark 16:16, belief comes before baptism. Same with Matthew 28:18-19, teaching comes before baptising. There is no example of the opposite unless you want to go outside of Scripture. Acts 8:36-37 is another prime example, which is why I brought it up because it so clearly dispels any doubt about what the requirements for baptism are. Philip answers it directly.>including by the very theologians of your own tradition. I am not a reformed baptist. And regardless of whether you would consider him part of that group, I do not think James White is even a believer. I have seen him mocking and making fun of the ending of Mark's Gospel. That's enough for me to say he is unsaved. This is regardless of his positions on the KJV, which are also wrong however, though some saved people have been deceived or misled by similar ideas to his.
I fucking hate Credos and firmly believe that the government should summarily execute anyone found to be a credo. Credos are satanic.
>>18252703>he waters of the flood and of baptism are figures to that which saves usThat's not what the verse says, you don't understand plain English. The antitype to the waters of the flood are the waters of baptism. The waters of baptism save us through the resurrection of Jesus. This is the plain English reading, you do not have good reading comprehension. >John 3:3-7 is the difference between being born in the flesh versus the spiritual being born again. That reading doesn't work because it makes Jesus's statement redundant. "Unless a man be born of water and of Spirit he cannot enter the Kingdom of Heaven". According to you Jesus is saying "Unless a man is born first and then born spiritually he cannot enter the Kingdom of Heaven." That makes the first part of Jesus's statement essentially a tautology, and meaningless. Of course you have to be born first to be born of the Spirit! People who aren't born the first time can't be born a second time! So that makes no sense. Jesus must be speaking of water baptism here. Not because baptism actually regenerates a person, but because the grace of regeneration is applied in baptism. >Titus 3:5This verse proves that baptism isn't a work but a gift of God. You just refuted yourself. >You're quoting an unbeliever.You're not a believer you're a heretic.
>>18252706>Yes it does contradict and overturn the practice as being wholly unbiblical. Similar to how Acts 2:41-42 does as well. Only those who believed were baptized, not all.>It's like this time and again in every example. Acts 18:8 for example. He first believed, and then was baptized, according to Acts 18:8. In Acts 16 with the jailer, it says he believed with all his house. And so on. And in Mark 16:16, belief comes before baptism. Same with Matthew 28:18-19, teaching comes before baptising. There is no example of the opposite unless you want to go outside of Scripture. Acts 8:36-37 is another prime example, which is why I brought it up because it so clearly dispels any doubt about what the requirements for baptism are. Philip answers it directly.>And if you want to bring up verse 11 of Colossians 2 as a way to deflect, that will not work either. Because the connection Paul makes there is sound: being born again always happens before baptism, just as being physically born happened before circumcision.Wrong. Paul explicitly makes a direct connection between the covenant promise given to Abraham and baptism in Galatians 3:27-29, and this is precisely Paul's point in Colossians 2:11-14. Furthermore, this same covenant promise is made by Peter to the Jews AND THEIR CHILDREN on the day of Pentecost directly following his command for them to be baptized (Acts 2:38-39) which directly contradicts your assertion that baptism and confession were always connected. Besides this nothing in any of those verses you cited above is prescriptive. According to you, if we take your view to its logical end we face a major dilemma which I've already pointed out on here multiple times. Let's take the example of Mark 16:16 which you cite,
>>18252706Continued from above...>Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemnedThen according to your logic infants have absolutely no means of salvation and are damned to hell, or babies by their nature can enter the Kingdom of God without the grace of Jesus Christ, making this verse irrelevant to them, which in turn makes you a Pelagian heretic and you explicitly deny scripture which speaks of our corrupt nature (Ephesians 2:3, Romans 5:12, Psalm 51:5). But when we actually read Mark 16:16 PLAINLY Jesus is not setting down any kind of order for faith and baptism here, he merely says you must believe AND be baptized, he does not say "You must first believe... THEN be baptized." So your reading does not hold up to scrutiny. The point Jesus makes in Mark 16:16 is that baptism and faith are connected, because baptism is the sacrament of faith! And this is exactly what Peter articulates in 1 Peter 3:21! You are a heretic, a non-Christian, and you are going to hell.
Historically speaking why does this always seem to work on a geopolitical angle?
>>18252278You seriously believe the capital of China had a population of 200,000 in 1937? Are you retarded? Its reasons like this why I didn't and still don't believe you. Trust me, I am very open to the idea that Nanjing was complete fabrication, and I have no vested interest one way or the other. It is very easy to believe that humans would rape and murder hundreds of thousands, and very easy to believe that humans would lie about such a thing. But in this specific situation, I believe you to be a retard lying faggot. Again, please feel free to prove me wrong with anything resembling a source.
>>18252187John Rabe
>>18252193Japan committed far worse atrocities than Germany
>>18251372forget nanjing unit 731the worst war crime japan ever commit was inventing anime
>>18252078Russia wasn't always a Bolshevik entity, Bolshevism was a subversion of original Russian culture.
Nazi or Alien Base in Antarctica found in Google Earth- NEUSCHWABENLAND - Station 211https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=D9AwRuW-JnsThe Nazis never died. They just went underground or otherwise it is an alien or secret western government base of some kind
>>18252790Once the Nazi breakaway civilization comes up it's over for the low iq mixed race indigenous population of Antarctic.
What happens in the timeline where the US doesn't conquer Hawaii, and the Hawaiian royalty goes through with their plan to intermarry other Polynesian royalty to combine all of the islands into one country?
>>18252781They still get taken over by the UK.
>>18252781Japan would colonize them
America would still have military bases in Hawaii and elsewhere in the Pacific because there is realistically nothing they could do to stop it from happening.
>be one of hundreds of cult leaders of the time>born a god but did nothing til midlife crisis (even Krishna was killing bad people as a baby IIRC)>other cult leaders had just as many if not more eyewitness miracles>guy pisses off the feds>surely he will be lash-proof?>no>surely he will just make his hands immune to nails?>gets nailed>surely he will hang indefinitely pontificating to the masses to undermine the regime>just dies and cries about it like a normal guy>cultists: he meant to do that...(for you)>people leave>die hards realise things look shit, claim he comes back to life (but not in the same form for some reason)>may I see him?>noComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18252639>>18252671FP:>Why aren't there non-biblical accounts of Christ by other Judeans? This is proof that Christ wasn't real.LP:>The biblical accounts of Christ can't be written by the apostles because Judeans can't write.Bravo anon.
>>18252695I'm not the first post. I'm a different anon. I don't care that we don't have hundreds of accounts, because as you said, the vast majority of people were illiterate (and they wouldn't have survived over the years anyway). But you can't have it both ways either. You can't say "most people were illiterate" and at the same time say the apostles wrote their "accounts" in Greek. The gospels were written decades after Jesus lived by individuals who had heard stories and wrote them down. The church later ascribed authorship.
>>18252446Nice cope lol
>>18252753Not an argument. I accept your concession.
>>18252496it is not surprising that there is relatively little contemporary written material about Jesus from the 1st century AD. Historians widely recognize this pattern for most figures from that era, especially those outside elite Roman or imperial circles.Common people mostly used wax tablets for temporary purposes, erasing and reusing them. Anything written on papyrus by non-elites (e.g., personal letters) rarely aimed for preservation.Jesus operated as an itinerant preacher in rural Galilee and Judea, a remote province of the Roman Empire, primarily among lower-class Jews. His ministry lasted only a few years and ended in execution as a criminal under Pontius Pilate. At the time, he attracted no widespread attention from Roman administrators, historians, or Jewish elites in urban centers like Jerusalem or Rome.Its actually a miracle that we are still talking about this guy 2,000 years later, and over half of the planet either venerates him, or worships him, in some way.
What would Britain's cultural climate be if Thatcher never rose to power?
It would unironically be less brown
>>18252569Britain?
Yes, I listen to Fin vs History as well. Charlie is proper getting on my tits.
>>18252574I also mean in terms of art, music and literature.
Yes the dark ages were real, yes the fall of rome was a disaster for western civilization, yes the people on picrel are 99% responsible for it and should actively be blamed and shamed.Germanics are the cancer of europe, eternal cowards, buffons, incompetents, liars and traitors. There's no salvation for Europe unless we destroy the Germanic race until there's nothing left of it but a faint ill memory.
>>18252166technically the welsh fathered romanticism
>>18250603The countries depicted there are the literal creators of modern civilization, thoughever. France would be included if they weren't so up their own ass about being French, Spain would be included if they hadn't mixed with brown Arabs and then brown Central Americans and fucked themselves over forever. As it stands, Germany, the UK and Scandinavia are pretty much all the human race has going for it other than America.Everywhere else is a complete and unapologetic brown or asian shithole LARPing as a human country.
>>18252825>As it stands, Germany, the UK and Scandinavia are pretty much all the human race has going for it other than America
>>18252825italy is probably the most relevant country that surpasses german states or italy
>>18252846*or spain i mean
While Jews were massacring and raping Palestinian Muslims, Palestinian Islamists founded terror groups dedicated to waging jihad and take over non-Muslim lands across the world.https://www.counterextremism.com/extremists/abdullah-azzam>Abdullah Azzam (1941-1989) was a Palestinian Islamist preacher who helped found al-Qaeda, Hamas, and Lashkar-e-Taiba.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/mono/10.4324/9780203866887-9/origins-ideology-structure-hizb-ut-tahrir-emmanuel-karagiannis>Hizb ut-Tahrir was founded in 1953 by Taqiuddin an-Nabhani, an Islamic scholar of Palestinian origin.Hamas and Palestinian Islamists support Azerbaijan against Christian Armenia, even though Azerbaijan sells oil to Israel & buys weapons from Israel.Hamas congratulated Azerbaijan for taking Nagorno-Karabakh.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18251845>Israel does not fund ISIS
>>18251890sure they don't
>>18251408In Iraq thousands of Palestinians came and joined alqeada and isis and killed and injured hundreds of thousands of people for being shia, they never killed a single American soldier
>>18251890it's part of their geo political strategy to fund terrorists
Haitham al-Haddad
On December 25, 274, Aurelian, after unifying the Roman Empire, instituted Roman monotheism under the god Sol.The other gods were relegated to mere saints focused on practical causes, such as the saint of marriage (Eros) and the saint of metalworkers (Hephaestus).Later, the only thing Flavius Constantinus and Flavius Theodosius did was replace the god Sol (Sol was the god's name) with Jesus, who had been created by his family during the time of Flavius Vespasianus and Flavius Titus.And, over time, the names of the saints were changed from pagan names to Catholic names.Until the 4th century, Christianity was merely a game played by the Roman elite, who controlled writing in the Empire. Only a small elite had full literacy, money to buy writing materials, and the right to produce and reproduce texts in the empire without being killed.The much-talked-about persecution of Christians was nothing more than conflicts between the elite who wanted to adopt Christianity as the state belief and the elite who opposed it.There is NOT A SINGLE ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE of the existence of early Christian groups in the first two centuries. Nothing. Zero.We have some texts from the 2nd century written by members of the elite allied with the Flavian family, the elite who destroyed Jerusalem. Many of these texts were written using false names and based on lies and propaganda.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18251292Still no answer OP?
HER NAME PLEASE
>>18249853What evidence would you find convincing?
>>18252636AI Sloppenstein
>>18252803No...
>God isn’t real and neither is intelligent design. My proof? The kidneys>>the kidneys don’t exist for any reason at all. Urine is actually vapor, a gaseous substance when it is in the stomach and it doesn’t pass through the kidneys but goes straight through the body to the bladder.>the kidneys exist for no reason at all with no purposeThis was a real philosopher by the way who said all this.
>>18252463Can you actually quote the work in question?
>>18252805>His view, in fact, is that the fluid which we drink passes into the bladder by being resolved into vapours, and that, when these have been again condensed, it thus regains its previous form, and turns from vapour into fluid. He simply looks upon the bladder as a sponge or a piece of wool, and not as the perfectly compact and impervious body that it is, with two very strong coats. For if we say that the vapours pass through these coats, why should they not pass through the peritoneum and the diaphragm, thus filling the whole abdominal cavity and thorax with water? "But," says he, "of course the peritoneal coat is more impervious than the bladder, and this is why it keeps out the vapours, while the bladder admits them." http://classics.mit.edu/Galen/natfac.1.one.html
Honest question, how could Nazis distinguish their Italian allies from the jews?Everytime I see a photo of that era and check out a non-dysgenic jew, I can't distinguish him from an italian, balkan or armenian boy.Are you telling me you will executed millions of people without knowing their DNA, just because their noses, really?Also, what about the "aryans" that converted from christianity to judaism? How do you know they are still aryans and didn't mix with "racial jews"?It all gets crazier when you check the noses of many important nazis, and they have hawk noses or hawk-like ones.If nazis just did all of this based in "looksmax", they did a pretty awful job.Also, what about the jews that hate judaism or had Aryan-like physiognomy, why would they be any danger of the State or the Race if they also hate what you hate and look similar to you?
>>18252384> the only judaic thing they had was their names and some festivitesWell, and communism and LGBTQ.
>>18252658Many assimilated jews weren't commies or even were against them, many "aryans" were commies. Same with the LGBT thing. Reality was / is / will be never a perfect homogeneous dualism.Many "aryan" commies and homosexuals had no problem joining the Nazi Party later on.
>>18252417post one group of italians who look like that. I dare you.(you can't)
Growupjak who is only half-Italian looks like a full-on jew caricature
>>18252743>"Italians are just jews with better food." - Tony Soprano
>top 20 deadliest wars in historyhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_toll>five are Chinese chimpouts (as expected)>two are German chimpouts (WW1 and 2)>two are Mongol chimpoutsBut then>five (5) are Spanish chimpouts>zero (0) are Anglo chimpoutsIt's funny how the Spanish Empire was so warmongering and even genocidal and yet now they're trying to libwash it and blame Anglos even though Spain was probably the most brutal European empire>but señoooor da evil Anglos were the worst because they had racial segregation o algo while the conquistadors wholesomely raped the Amerindian women o algo
>>18250671>Spanish conquest of Mexico>Death range: 10.5 million>note: Almost all of these deaths were caused by Old World diseases and not violent conflict.>Spanish conquest of the Inca Empire>Death range: 7.7 million>note: Almost all of these deaths were caused by Old World diseases and not violent conflict.>Spanish conquest of New Granada>Death range: 5.25 million>note: Almost all of these deaths were caused by Old World diseases and not violent conflict.
>>18250671You know what they say, you can take the nafri out of the rif mountains...
>>18250753>WW1 and 2 are Anglo chimpouts, as are the Napoleonic wars.>WW1>when they weren't even involved in the conflict until a week after it had started for everyone else
>>18250680Please finish your snails before bedtime Pierre
>>18251459I want to take this moment to apologize in the name of my ancestors, for not killing 10x more
I hate whenever I see this image posted because it's at best a complete failure in communication and at worst a deliberate attempt at poisoning the well.The massive problem with the image is that we as the readers are very aware of the fact that while using children as metaphors, it's actually talking about groups in society and state/societal policy... but the metaphor doesn't actually work, because there are key differences between the dynamics of 3 children and the dynamics of an entrie society.If we talk about the literal, actual scenario of the 3 children, with no room for metaphor, then child B makes the most sense to me, because assuming nobody is lying, child B is alredy in posession of the flute and has always been, and so any meddling would involve stealing a flute from a child who made it. BUT, if we then get tricked into accepting that this logic should be applied 1:1 to society as policy, we are tricked into accepting WILD conclusions, like rejecting all taxes, all social programs, arguably the entire system of justice ect, largely because you can't take a fraction of a flute.But if we rework the text to be what it's metaphorically saying, change child A to artists as a group, child B to flute manufacturers, and child C to the downtrodden, the solution is obvious, and it's the solution the vast majority of adults recognise as sensible: taxIf child B is cranking out 1000 flutes a day, there is no reason why we can't take, for example, 3%, and try to cover A and C's needs with those. The entire logic falls apart once as part of the discussion you recognise the metaphor just doesn't work, but every time the thread is posted, dishonest bad actors flood the thread with posts that pretend a reaction to the literal child dilemma is equivalent to real policies and try to argue for or against those policies based on an obviously and painfully flawed model.On a proper discussion website, these thread would be locked.
>>18252242This got spammed to justify the government stealing my video game website to give it to a jew who became a real estate agent and destroyed the community (objectively according to google trends and the end of yearly tournaments that I began).You're not talking about taxes, when this is posted it's literally being posted by "bad actors" who want to justify stealing from people to give it to people who are often evil and retarded and not in any way "better" or "more suited" but the "bad actors" believe the only thing that matters is wealth/social status/connections/ethnic heritage etc so when they say "a good flute player" there's a really good chance that what they really mean is "a rich person" or " jew" (who intends to destroy the flute)
>>18252242A white guy is in a jail cell about to be fucked by two black guys.>Black Guy A: "Ayo I finna get the cracker's ass. I gots the biggest dick here. And after all, the point of fuckin' a honkey's ass is to destroy it. The other nigga got a small dick, so why should he get to tap it first?>White dude B "My ass is my own. I don't want my ass to be destroyed. How can you possibly make me take BBC?">Black Guy C "Of the three of us, I am the poorest nigga here. I ain't got no milk, no cookies, nuffin. I should get dat whitey's ass."Who do you side with, /his/?
Of the ones that have made it, what caused it?>Genetics? Cutlure? Trade? High trust society? Geo position on the map? Climate? Tough people? Masculinity? Luck? Leadership? Great men? Technology? Organization? Belief? etcAnd of the ones who don't make it (the VAST majority) why couldnt they, and which ones could have made it?
>>18248766Yea no. There were plenty of states in that 2000 years of history where China thought itself directly opposed by a major threat. The Yarlung Dynasty, Chinggisids, Yeon Gaesomun, Wanyan Clan all estabilished their equal tributarie spheres and declared war on China.
>>18250458american forces in taiwan are unmarked and US has always officially affirmed their stance supporting one china policy. kissinger foreign policy has basically set the tone for US foreign policy: they exploit the region and when they reach an ultimatum, the US will take the most milquetoast position and leave. it happened with kurds, it happened in syria, it happened in afghanistan. china has a leverage to make you losers cuck out like this and i don't care to discuss how that makes you feel personally.>>18247317wagner is getting beheaded and humiliated by turks. it happened in egypt, syria, and now africa. impotent penal soldiers with swastikas arent superpower status, that's just an example of your country being third world.russia being the top gas provider in the world doesn't matter when your economy is so pigeonholed that it needs to export its only useful product to stay afloat.global south bows to US and NATO i suggest you hop off 4chan and view what kind of politicians have been elected in latam, how NATO aligned panafricanists are, and how sunnis are have made the west hand them two free countries on a silver platter.
>>18246010The only superpowers which have yet existed were/are the United States and the Soviet Union. The European Theater of WW2 was fought to prevent Germany/Europe ascending to superpower status contra the United States and Asia.
I can't really think of anything they all have in common except people
>>18247317Day 1401 of the Special Needs Operation to denazify the Oinkraine, PUCCIA is now resorting to chavalry attacks as WW3 arsenals are running dry due spending them in taking some dozens of kms at Dombass in the span of 3 plus years, somehow PUCCIA only shot at winning the war is reliant on some dementia-ridden US president not selling Cold War surplus to the ukrojewnazis.
