What is the evolutionary purpose of this?
>>18177522>Scythian men found this attractive steppebros...
>>18177522Mitigate snow blindnesshttps://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/15763-photokeratitis
>>18177522resistance to beatings
>>18177522>purposeNot exactly how sexual selection works.
>>18177528>be steppebro, tired from bad harvests and raiding shit>meet woman, she's not even half as attractive as the ones in the whorehouse>but she lets you put your head on her lap after a day of straining muscles, and constantly forgives your mistakesif she cares, any steppebro will eventually decide to live with her
If christianity is proto-communism, then why did the soviet union try to exterminate it instead of taking advantage of it?
>>18177014In The Old Testament, Yahweh explicitly tells David that Jews shouldn't have a King, because having a ruler leads to war, poverty, famine, and suffering.In the New Testament, Jesus fights the power of the state, finance, and religion as temporal power structure.The Holy Bible is an anarchist book in actuality
>>18177187nigga just skipped paul
>>18177235The epistles are relevant but not necessary to refute him since what's more relevant is his outright lying about the content of the Bible. The entire reason the Jews rejected Jesus was because they thought they would get a Messiah who fought the state, and he didn't do that. The Bible is by far the most widely lied about work in history.
>>18177187>In the New Testament, Jesus fights the power of the state, finance, and religion as temporal power structure.Interesting interpretation...
>>18177122I don't know, the foundation seems pretty much there with the original sin, the central point of repentance and the priestly vows of chastity and poverty. Why a vow of poverty if christianity likes the material world? Even compaeed to other religions, the propensity to shill the afterlife as hard as christions do seems to be almost communistic cope about getting fed to lions desu. The muslim prophet is a tradet,the religion has no popes or centralized clergy for a lack of the he supreme of the immaterial
How do orthobros cope over the fact that much of the high-ranking Russian Orthodox clergy were KGB assets from like the 60s onward? Not that I can really blame them because they didn’t have much of a choice. But it is a pretty big L.
The same reason Catholics don't discuss Pope Pius XII's tenure.
>>18177345The Orthodox Clergy being agents of the state isn't exactly unknown, it's basically one of the main tenants of their structure and has been a thing since the Later Roman Empire.
Why can't women be priests?Hard mode: Answer in a way that won't absolutely disgust me, a woman, and drive me away from Christianity forever.
>>18176944The only reason you asked this question is because your penis is floating in a pickle jar somewhere.
>>18168832Galatians 3:28“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”Priests have never been able to remit anyone’s sins. Remission or forgiveness of sins lies in the atonement of Jesus Christ (Heb 10v1-12 – it is never to be ‘repeated’) God forgave all through the Old Testament (Exod 34v7) but could not clear the guilty until Mat 26v28 (Heb 10v4). Therefore no Roman Catholic priest can forgive your sins and he certainly is not a mediator between God and man – 1 Tim 2v5. Anyway, all Christians are priests – Heb 3v1, 13v15, 1 Pet 2v1-5 – Since there is not one verse in the Bible indicating that there is any priesthood in the New Testament, except a priesthood of born-again believers (1 Pet 2) – therefore the entire system of two million priests in the Roman Catholic church is utterly non-Biblical, non-Christian, and non-NewTestament.Hebrews 10:10-14 "By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins: But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool. For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified."Romans 8:3: “For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:”If you're not sure the Bible is the word of God watch: youtube.com/watch?v=9l5ZEsXjNVI1 Cor. 15:3-4: “For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:” Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18170499Mary is not without sin.
>>18176978Another anon with a terminal case of Fregoli delusion. Far too common on this website. I guess the tranny obsession among your type makes sense though, If you're convinced there's only one other person in the world beside yourself, then that person would have to spend half their time crossdressing.
>>18168832It is a restriction made largely in Catholic and Orthodox Christianity. In these denominations the priest represents Christ in those moments where he performs the sacraments, and as Christ was born male with no gender ambiguity the priest must also be born male and cisgender. Having the sacraments be performed by a woman or a transgender is akin to saying that oranges can substitute for lemons simply because they are in the same family of citrus fruits; it does not jive.Protestants do not have such blanket statements spanning all of their denominations, so there are woman priests.
Who are the real Christians?
>>18177390Coping
>>18177534Seething.
>>18177210Jews
>>18177273It's called Roman Catholic for a reason
>>18177427>kvetching and seething it's ok. just breathe and let go of your anger
How is it possible that south america countries (mainly Brazil, Argentina, and Uruguay) seemed like European territories in the 1920s and 30s, but today they're a shithole (brownies paradise)? I think it's a clear case of jewish intervention.
>>18177397
>>18176640this unironically
>>181751761. Panama Canal (mentioned already) 2. rural migration into big cities3. failure/late to industrialize4. paralyzed, isolated, and arrogant upper class that was completely incapable of dealing with modernitygreat example is Brasil's government being literally rounded up, shot and a military junta happening because the country had run out of money, too many people had flooded into rio, there wasn't enough products for anyone and the socialists in control were still thinking they could be a third way between US and USSR without nuclear energy or nuclear weapons
There are streets that do look like this doe. The favelas are a result of poor people from the rural areas being forced to move en masse to urban areas.
>>18175176>mainly Brazil
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XB1YAsxETqs
>>18177416How much he was willing to sell out for.
ok i'm sorry if this is a stupid question, but what did they eat? since it was so far north there was surely barely any land for growing food, so how did they survive? fishing and hunting?
>>18176637>Chronicle. Singular.Not singular but as I wrote, chroniclesBecause the original is losthttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurentian_Codexhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatian_Codex>The Rus Chronicle also calls the Baltic the "Varangian Sea"yes and?>Tacitus called it the Suebic Sea, Latin: Mare Suebicum after the Germanic people of the Suebi,[8][9] and Ptolemy Sarmatian Ocean after the Sarmatians,[10] but the first to name it the Baltic Sea (Medieval Latin: Mare Balticum) was the eleventh-century German chronicler Adam of Bremen.
>>18176642literally wrong stop spreading bullshithttps://www.mgh-bibliothek.de/dokumente/a/a011458.pdf
>>18176667Ha you're totally right, I just misread "from there go to the races of Ham" whoops
Codexes and manuscripts refer to a single chronicling. They're considered versions of the same story or source material. So yes, singular.
>>18176353is she going to kill that cute thing :0 nooooo
>The 1891 New Orleans lynchings were the murders of 11 Italian Americans, immigrants in New Orleans, by a mob>It was the largest single mass lynching in American history.>Most of the lynching victims accused in the murder had been rounded up and charged due to their Italian ethnicity.Thoughts?
>>18177437TRVKE
Based
If you actually look into this story, the mob that killed them was multiracial, full of blacks and coloreds as well as whites. One of the leaders of the lynch mob was James Lewis who was a mixed race black advocate. The most high profile person they killed was Joseph Macheca who was a Confederate veteran and rich local Democratic Party megadonor who ran a white supremacist street gang called The Innocents that intimidated blacks and Republicans in New Orleans.
>>18177437Macheca and his gang were anti-reconstruction Democrats that tried to keep New Orleans safe from negro crime and uphold white rule in the South, like the Ku Klux Klan. Of course, Anglos are negro lovers when it comes down to it and don't want to talk about what really happened.
>>18177526>Joseph MachecaHe was also a member of the white league. Lmao, it caught me off guard the first time I read the Wikipedia article
Do we have any proof of Krishna's existence as a person like we do with figures like Buddha and Jesus or is he purely fictitious?
>>18176361He is a historical figure, but from Divine History, the History that really mattersHe gave us the Song of the Lord (in English)https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvctceCTQG8LMSWNsKx1otfLUw0N_Jysxin the second Chapter, Krishna start giving his reply to Arjuna
>>18176679Was Krishna already a concept well before the texts compiled or something introduced after?
>>18176445You see this all throughout history though. You’ve got a ruler/leader who is fairly exceptional, he does a bunch of stuff that impresses his contemporaries, and the people who come along later end up worshipping the historical figure and applying various elements of their concepts about divinity. This doesn’t even take that long since many cultures often times ascribe divine mandates to their successful leaders. It makes a lot less sense to have Krishna be pure myth, much like claiming Jesus or Sargon were myths.
>>18177311I'm starting to be more convinced of this. The mythology of Vishnu and the concept of avatars seems to predate Krishna which implies he's an addition.
>>18176361y blu tho? I get the euhemerization, but why make him so physically distinct and inhuman in appearance?"Black" and "Blue" are often conflated in many languages, including Old Norse and other IE forms. Could he have been a Dravidian, that they changed into a "magical blueman" out of shame?
>None of you shall approach any one of his close relatives to uncover nakedness. I am the Lord. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father, which is the nakedness of your mother; she is your mother, you shall not uncover her nakedness. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father’s wife; it is your father’s nakedness. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your sister, your father’s daughter or your mother’s daughter, whether brought up in the family or in another home. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your son’s daughter or of your daughter’s daughter, for their nakedness is your own nakedness. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father’s wife’s daughter, brought up in your father’s family, since she is your sister. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father’s sister; she is your father’s relative. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your mother’s sister, for she is your mother’s relative. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father’s brother, that is, you shall not approach his wife; she is your aunt. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your daughter-in-law; she is your son’s wife, you shall not uncover her nakedness. You shall not uncover the nakedness of your brother’s wife; it is your brother’s nakedness. You shall not uncover the nakedness of a woman and of her daughter, and you shall not take her son’s daughter or her daughter’s daughter to uncover her nakedness; they are relatives; it is depravity. And you shall not take a woman as a rival wife to her sister, uncovering her nakedness while her sister is still alive.
>>18177500They did do it, they just didn't see anything wrong with it. They thought all of their gods were fucking their relatives.
>>18177508So did the greeks
>>18177515Yeah, who were pagans too, plus all the pedophilia and faggotry.
>>18177450Based YHWH making all the incestuous degenerates seethe.
>>18177529And then He makes them burn.
The Secret Jewish History Of Sports GamblingArnold “The Brain” Rothstein was probably the most notorious Jewish sports gambler of all time. He first focused on horse racing, in which his wide net of informants trading inside information helped establish him as a kingpin of organized crime in the early 20th century, making him a millionaire by age 30. And though it’s still a matter of some controversy, Rothstein is generally credited with one of the biggest sports bets of all time: the so-called Black Sox Scandal of 1919, in which someone — Rothstein? — paid the Chicago White Sox to deliberately lose the World Series to the Cincinnati Reds. The fix paid off handsomely to those who bet on the Reds, including Rothstein himself, who nonetheless was never indicted for the crime.But Rothstein was just one of a long line of Jewish sports gamblers, dating back at least as far as Dr. Robert Underwood, who, according to the New York Times, is considered the founding father of modern bookies. “Doc Underwood, as all gamblers knew him,” wrote The Times, “sold his first pool in 1855 in New Orleans on a match race between the horses Lexington and LeCompte and later ran a betting operation out of the basement of the United States Hotel in Saratoga Springs, N.Y.” According to Leonard Jay Greenspoon’s “Jews in the Gym: Judaism, Sports, and Athletics,” Underwood was followed in the profession in subsequent years by several prominent members of the tribe, including Sol Lichtenstein, Abe Levy and Kid Weller.https://forward.com/culture/401071/the-secret-jewish-history-of-sports-gambling/
>>18177230lmao no they're notTitus and Hadrian wiped out the original Ivdaean population
>>18177251a small amount of them remained, there are pockets of authentic original Jews in Israel who have lived there all that time but yes about 90% of them are fakers of various kinds, often Arabs who posed as Jews in the 60s to obtain Israeli citizenship (ie. most Mizhrai) and Palestinians aren't native Levantines either they're Bedouin squatters who came after the Roman revolts.
>>18177251That's literally israeli propagandaMost Jews remained in Palestine and were never expelled, then converted to Islam. Most of the Jews who left weren't forced out but emigrated to cities around the Roman Empire for economic reasons.
>>18177308what most jews?Titus slaughtered 500k (the Romans counted fighting age men only)Hadrian 50 years later over 600k (considering he brought 12 legions, literally half the standing army etc.)How many people did Ivdaea have originally? It was a poor and semi-arid backwater, not populous Egypt or Mesopotamia
All I know about him is from boardwalk empire and AR seemed basedFuck sportsniggers
The Nazis hated "degenerate art" but you can argue that Nazi art was a degeneration of Classical stuff. It's tasteless chud stuff. Their propaganda looked degenerate and low IQ as well.
Hitler himself was pretty bad at painting faces and the human form. I always wondered if the seething over degenerate/bolshevik art just stemmed from some sort of inferiority complex. His landscapes and paintings of buildings were decent. He unironically should’ve been an architect.
>>18177488>88He just needed to practice more. Painting is hard, and he needed more time to get his technique down.
>>18177474Cope Juden.Go watch Leni Riefenstahl's Triumph Des Willens or Olympia.Or don't, witnessing true beauty might cause you to evaporate like a vampire exposed to sunlight.
>>18177506>BrekkerslopYou will never be Greco Roman.
>>18177488I actually like this painting. But yeah normally he could only paint buildings
>Only Eastern Orthodoxy can give you the epistemic justification of why mathematics functions in our earthly life.>Every Christian not in communion with the Moscow Patriarchate is damned.What is his problem?
>>18176249>Most EO converts in the west are papists who were dissatisfied with the pope not being based and trad like they expected so they transplanted their popery wholesale to the church of Moscow, so they are exactly the same in every way except their pope speaks Russian (or more rarely Greek)They also have many child abuse cases:https://cne.news/article/73-russian-church-does-not-easily-admit-abuse
>>18171158>why mathematics functions in our earthly life?Can a christian explain the connotation here?
>>18176345I think God becoming flesh to dwell among us acts like a bridge for proposition 6, to achieve earthly function with truths within God.Also maybe the Palamist divine energies help us discover the various ideas within the "platonic" realm, and we use our Nous for it.
>>18174682>yuuup my favorite ethnic group is.... this one
>>18173261>Are EO's just Catholics than don't want the accountability that comes with holding to the position that the Pope got a superpower to never be wrong?Maybe it begins that way, but at a certain point as an EO convert you realize that things like the Filioque (and subsequent subordination of the Spirit), the legalistic/rationalistic spirit (as opposed to mystical), the de-emphasis of the physical body, the tendency towards innovation (itself linked to the rationalistic spirit) and the tendency towards emotionality are all much bigger issues than the Pope. I often say that if I was forced to become Catholic, but was allowed to change one thing about Catholicism in exchange, the Pope would be pretty far down my list. In fact if hypothetically the Catholic Church was just "the Eastern Orthodox Church but with a Pope" then I don't think the Schism would have even happened. Papal authority itself is not the issue to me, its the other deviations that inevitably come alongside it. In other words if the Pope made the right call all the time then I would have no issue with there being a Pope and honestly might even like having a visible head for the Church. I see the appeal.
> The Nuremberg Trials Begins!The only time in history >following orders was globally rejected as an excuse.It pioneered simultaneous translation, using colored lights to signal which language was being spoken.The first trial was for 24 defendants, but only 21 actually appeared in the dock.It created the new legal terms >crimes against peace" and >crimes against humanity.The chief American prosecutor was a Supreme Court justice who took a leave of absence.Hermann Göring was a charismatic defendant who extensively debated the prosecutors.Ten of the convicted were hanged, but Hermann Göring cheated the noose by suicide.The judges came from the four Allied powers: the US, UK, France, and the Soviet Union.It was the first time a head of state was held criminally responsible in an international court.The extensive film and photographic evidence became a permanent record of Nazi atrocities.Three defendants were acquitted, a controversial outcome that surprised the world.
>>18176102Officers who were to well known and had already been jailed awaiting trail was not spared. It wasn't the entire Allied intelligence apparatus that was in on it, on the contrary it seems Allen Dulles took the initiative on his own without Roosevelt signing off on it even Churchill found it strange. From what I've read none of them were recruited willingly but were forced to work for them. What Nazi turned soviet collaborators did I miss?
>>18176100>Did you try Ol' Reliable, Schomblich?>I did Schtorkle! I called him a tranny! It's supposed to make the goyim do as we say! But he's still bringing up the fact that we tortured confessions out of people!>TRY CALLING HIM GAY OR BLACK THEN! I'LL GET THE RABBI!
>>18175381>making up the laws as needed>trial
>>18175945Nazis never gave anyone a trial so posts like this are basically the equivalent of a nigger crying racism after shooting someone.
>>18176067It is ironic, because they based their whole argument around the idea that the precedent had already been set.It wasn't really, of course, but that was a apart of their BS argument. They had to add an aire of formality to their foregone conclusion to execute each and every one of those Nazi sons of bitches.
