I’m going to post this every day until you remember it
>>18489672what?
>>18489672Red necks fighting to keep their "right" to own people? Yeah..what about it?
>named Charles the Gaul>leader of modern day GaulWho writes this shit?
>>18489550Ironically, the name comes from his Dutch ancestors and has zero connection with the ethnonym
>>18489550Me and a couple of anons would surely sacrifice themselves in the hot summer of 1944 to KILL this faggot no matter the cost.Adolf Hitler set France on a course to being recognised as a little less than equals and Clown de Gaul set France back a 10 000 years.
>>18489550he was probably gaulish
>>18489550>Francisco Franco>SpainYou know the writers had a nice giggle writing this
fact or fake?
>>18489215it was fake
Wuz we kangz?
>>18489856yes
PAY ATTENTION:Master: "You see how many opinions there are about God. Each opinion is a path. There are innumerable opinions and innumerable paths leading to God."Bhavanath: "Then what should we do?"Master: "You must stick to one path with all your strength. A man can reach the roof of a house by stone stairs or ladder or a rope-ladder or a rope or even by a bamboo pole. But he cannot reach the roof if he sets foot now on one and now on another. He should follow one path. Likewise, in order to realise God a man must follow one path with all his strength.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramakrishna#TeachingsHe knew. He tested different paths, one by one.
Homie became a specialist in reaching God/Truth.
>>18489484he didn't
>On April 1, 2001, a US Air Force EP-3E surveillance aircraft collided with a Chinese F-8 fighter jet over Hainan Island, off the coast of China. The EP-3E crew were forced to make an emergency landing on the island, where the Chinese held them prisoner for ten days until the Bush Administration were able to negotiate their release. The pilot of the F-8, Wang Wei, was killed in the mishap. China returned the plane to the US three weeks later in pieces.[2]
>>18488802it was real
>>18489123>NOOOO YOU HAVE TO GIVE BACK MY SECRET SPY PLANE EVEN AFTER IT FLEW INTO YOUR TERRITORY, CRASHED INTO YOUR PLANE, AND KILLED ONE OF YOUR MEN
>>18489113>Armatard anon migrated to /his/yikes lmao
>>18489123The crew destroyed the operating manuals for the aircraft per standard procedure.
18490280can someone translate this from schizo to English?
My history teacher wants to know how can I know so much stuff and always get good grades if according to my resume I never had entered college beforeShould I tell him that I spent years studying history from books like pic or just keep quiet?
Your proffesor is a Mason.You out yourself as a good human, or get outed by others - You will fall out of favour with these inept, impotent bottomfeders. College is not what it used to be. The good professors teach the things that matter elswhere - not in the class. Perhaps on their YouTube chanells or their inner circles.
>>18489144your history teachers sound retarded
>Restore ChristianityYou're welcome
>>18488830You also believe that Jesus is Michael which makes bo sense. Why would the Archangel of Archangels be the Son of Man? Why would the commander of the heavenly armies become a Son of David? Why would God make an Archangel the Eternal King of Israel? Why would Michael be an Israelite?
>>18489801>You also believe that Jesus is Michael which makes bo senseIt does make sense. Archangel means 'chief of the angels'. Jesus was given all authority in Heaven, so he commands the celestial army. >Why would the Archangel of Archangels be the Son of Man?Because Jehovah transferred his life into the womb of the virgin Mary>Why would the commander of the heavenly armies become a Son of David?To fulfill the prophecies about the Messiah>Why would God make an Archangel the Eternal King of Israel?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18488091no
>>18488299what's up with the "Jehovah God" thing?Why say God twice? That's like unironically saying "God God".
To clarify the JW cult is not Christian
Has anybody got a book on the Soviet collective farm program, specifically push in the 50's to settle the far steppes? Its always mentioned but they rarely go past "It was badly organized and a dubious idea, lets go see how the boys in Moscow liked it"
My mind holds only what I think with God.Forgiveness is the key to happiness.Forgiveness offers everything I want. (https://acim.org/acim/en/s/547#1:1-2 | W-141.1:1-2)
Remember when he tried the whole forgiveness thing 2,000 years ago and you guys never got better?In fact, you guys actually got progressively worse.The best path for all is for you guys to take less control of that which you guys should not be handling to begin with.
>>18488326Whats going in in that picture
>>18489969A bunch of vacuum women trying to pretend to be the other half of Jesus and steal everything away from him
>>18488326god does not forgive
Do you think Jesus had statues of St. Moses and St. Abraham in his house growing up?
>>18489534Sis Paul had statues of Mary and Jesus in his house?
>>18489534>>18489818AI slop
>>18489534jesus was a weird guy
If separation were real, peace could never exist.If fear were truth, love could never be constant.If individuality were ultimate reality, conflict would be eternal.If God is perfect Oneness, a real opposite cannot arise.
>>18487715>If God is perfect Oneness, a real opposite cannot arise1 does have an opposite, it's called -1.
>>18487804I don't get it. Where did you read 1?
>>18487715Intuitively ur right in that perfect oneness is stasis and nothing, void. but the opposite of that is something. Something appearing is when u split nothing into two parts and u name one part.
>>18487715>If separation were real, peace could never exist.why ?>If individuality were ultimate reality, conflict would be eternal.what conflict ?
>>18487715it was not real
And I'm tired of pretending they weren't.
how come WW1 saw multiple large scale mutinies / revolutions not even 2 years into the conflict while WW2 didn't have anything like this?
>>18487816ww1 was an intra-imperialist war where the common soldier had nothing to gainww2 was an existential struggle for anyone the axis invaded
>>18487895Petard, WW1's static frontlines would be easier to observe/police compared to WW2's massive & dynamic frontlines
>>18489285>>18489483Edgar Hoover firing up his IBM in 1941 and personally flagging pro-Japan shitposts was an unthinkable idea for Tsar Nicholas
>>18489518Yeah Russia and Austria were super lax in early 20th century and there was legitimate freedom for many people in those societies, but it's not like any Hitler underling could micromanage soldiers grumbling in their trenches in Ukraine
>>18487816why would they need a revolution
How come post WW2 Modernism wasnt as extreme as Post WW1 Modernism? You'd think it would have been even more radical and schizophrenic than the interwar modernism of Futurism/Dada/Surrealism/Cubism etc etc since it was a reaction to the brutality of the 1st world war. Instead it was just mundane Andy Warhol type shit.
>>18487445So what's post modernism?
>>18487445the image doesnt wish death on traditionalists, youre projecting.
>>18486683>How come post WW2 Modernism wasnt as extreme as Post WW1 ModernismI don't think that statement is true
>>18486683The art historical nature of this inquiry begs for some context though, which um unless i am mistaken is asking about an aesthetic that hypostasizes the radical and the schizophrenic as a texture that ‘can be read like patterns of thoughts and architectonic idea-sensations from the text’ and this is relevant to cubism because the theory for cubism was broken off midway through the war and never completed all the way and part of the way that art comes down is also a challenger to older classical representative art that relied on perspective but in the universe of newton became more and more deterministic and there are several ways that the sources to modernism might get grounded or emphasized the nineteenth century though is when that aesthetic of the modern begins to take awareness of that aesthetic as an aesthetic, and part to that is an artist like duchamp does not always get responded to immediately or the art does always find response from other art immediately especially with the demand that art makes on art and on composition if those demands are especially radical, duchamp is still reckoned with
>>18486683it was just as extreme, you are wrong
