My use of Judeo-Christian as a term is usually when what I’m saying is applicable only to Judaism and Christianity, when it applies to all Abrahamic religions, I do say Abrahamic. And a lot of times it's a term uses just to acknowledge the Jewish origins of Christianity.The three major Abrahamic religions form a Venn diagram, you can make any one of them seem the most different from the other two based on what you choose to emphasize or de-emphasize. And all three have in common not just what it academically means to be Abrahamic but also our expectation of a future bodily resurrection of the dead, that is why I don't accuse Muslims of being pagans.The thing is, Christianity’s common ground with either of the others is much more doctrinal, much more tied to the core definition of what being a Christian even is. While the common ground between Judaism and Islam is much more cultural, a product of being tied to the Near East and Semitic languages. And indeed, Middle Eastern Semitic speaking Christians seem a lot less different from Jews and Muslims on such things.I’ve talked before about how the core confessional beliefs of New Testament Christianity are that Jesus is both the Christ/Messiah and the Son of God. Muslims agree that Jesus was the Messiah or Al-Maish. Jews don’t believe Jesus was the only begotten Son of God but they do believe all Israelites are children of God.I identify with the label Judeo-Christian not because of what that tends to mean politically to American conservatives who I loathe, or because I want to deny that Islam is Abrahamic (which I don’t), or because of my sympathies with the Hebrew Roots movement. It’s because what we have in common with Islam over Judaism is something nominal, something with minimal impact on how Islam actually functions as a religion while Judaism does still believe in the concept that they believe Jesus was not.
>>17513021>this faggot actually used chatGPT to conjure up a novel length of euphoric bullshit
>>17513021>Judeo-Christianbacuse you share the same scrip retard!muslims dont share any script with either of youyous they have more or less same prophets but even the story of them are different
>/his/tory>religion kek
>>17513145yeah the Torahhowever Judeo-Muslim beliefs or probably even Christian-Muslim beliefs existever heard of perennialists... yeah its dumb >I am RustScript developer but idk why the program doesnt compileWell its applicability or validity from a theological standpoint is a separate debate for the theology students who somehow find it eye-comforting to read an enormous amount of books per year
>>17513165Muslims are monotheists so they share the same beliefChristians hold that Christ came from Jewish tribesits deeply related
What is the point of having an immortal feudal lord that is everywhere, knows everything and do anything if he doesn't protect his vassals?
>God>in Indiana
>>17513033>omnipresent>therefore yes
>>17513031God was too busy sending unbaptized babies to the lava pit.
>>17513086Accidentally kek'd.
Try to refute him
>>17509096>Race has objective biological foundations that can't be disputed>objective biological foundationsWhat race are Arabs?
>>17510909So if racism is normal, are you not going to sue if you're explicitly rejected from a job because of your race?
>>17510906Is it me or is this face actually ugly as fuck
>>17512158it looks strange
>>17509034He still very much absolutely believed in racial supremacy and cultural supremacy and tied the beliefs on the latter to the former on top of the many laws he implemented in the areas Italy invaded/conquered.
Why did architecture seemingly peak in the 1920s-1930s and then just rapidly decline to absolute dogshit borderline cardboard box tier today?Shouldn't architecture have become more ornate, beautiful with the development of automated routing technology, power tools etc? What was the historical reason the West seemingly gave up completely on actually having beauty in architecture?
>>17511587Beauty is a German construct. Russian Bolshevism and Jewish capitalism have no use for beauty
>>17511587Liberals/Marxists destroyed religion and classical education that promoted a worldview which held things like beautiful, traditional architecture in high esteem. >>17511631postmodern materialist cope
>>17511587Some architects who should have been slaughtered have not been slaughtered. That is all.
>>17512118>PoundsburyLooks like shit.
>>17511587Automation and other industrial advancements made skilled labor and craftmanship redundant, thus you get standardized factory made pieces ready to assemble on sitehttps://youtu.be/UOaTQiGMr8o?t=241https://youtu.be/DBOXF-FION4https://youtu.be/llZ4Rj5ajpk?t=22
What is the most evil regime in recorded history?
>>17510321based strategy anondid you win?
>>17510389>we cannot guarantee freedom after speechhe was a real one
>>17511012>y'allgr8 b8 m8r8 14/88
>>17511327>implyingkekerino
>>17511171This is where the actual discussion starts, thank me later.
This is fucking SCANALOUS! ARREST HIM.
This cannot be denied. If you look at the facts and not propaganda, you will see that Sophie Scholl was the most despicable person in history. She got better than she deserved, she deserved far worse than she got.
what was the best Puritan colony?
What was the point of handing Maine to Massachusetts when New Hampshire is right there?>>17512692But to answer the question, Connecticut since they weren't as burny burny as the rest of them
>>17512979new hampshire was too weak to handle maine
>>17513076based, maine is a strong independent colony who don't need no man
>>17512979Nobody was ever burned at the stake in colonial America. That's some continental Euro bullshit that mainly happened in Germany and France. They didn't even go so far as to draw and quarter anyone iirc. They simply hanged people. All of that over the top torture porn shit that happened in Europe was done at the behest of monarchy, and the purpose was for spectacle. Despite the bad rap Puritans get, they were much less inhumane than the Catholics and Anglicans.
and Hitler should be praised for it. All of his generals cried that it could not be done. So Hitler drew up his own plans, all his generals had to do was follow the orders. They did, and were astounded as France just melted away. They destroyed France completely, like no nation had ever done before. People deny that Hitler was a military genius, but the Battle of France proves that Hitler was the greatest general of WW2, not Eisenhower or Patton or Montgomery. Not even Rommel. It was Hitler, a true genius of military might. The opening stages of Barbarossa were his second masterstroke.
>Be military leader>lose war>commit suicideTruly one of the greats.
>>17512922But he didn't draw up the plans? You could, if you'd like, give him credit for adopting the plan that was presented to him by Manstein, but Hitler didn't come up with it himself. The credit for the plan belongs to Manstein and Halder primarily, with additional credit to Guderian and Rommel for just ignoring orders during the invasion to halt when ordered to.Also Barborossa was plainly and obviously retarded I don't know why you would want to give anyone credit for it.
>>17512947Shut up, communist scum. Trump won btw
>>17513054And you lost
>>17512965>Also Barborossa was plainly and obviously retarded I don't know why you would want to give anyone credit for it.Because Germans still had massive successes like taking over Belarus and Ukraine, as well as slaughtering millions of Soviet soldiers which ruin East Slavic birthrates.
Were black americans as criminal back then as they are today? How did white americans explain their behavior? Did black americans defend criminals back then as well if they were killed by white cops?
>>17513072>Were black americans as criminal back then as they are today?Not as much due to fear of reprisal.>How did white americans explain their behavior? They carefully monitored and severely disciplined any who stepped out of line>Did black americans defend criminals back then as well if they were killed by white cops?Many did, yes. Most lynchings were justified in their intent, despite perhaps not so in their methodology.
Jewish ancestry is a topic of much debate, but the fact of the matter is that the existence of Jewish (Ashkenazi) racial genetics is not possible. DNA testing sites claim that certain individuals have Jewish genes, but such claims are not backed up by science. After all, the genes in question are not labeled as Jewish before they appear on a report. They are only labeled as such after the fact, which is to say, arbitrarily.Furthermore, it is strange that Jewish genes appear on genetic reports, but there are no such occurrences for Christianity, Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, or any other religion. Many people of Jewish backgrounds carry similar genes due to ancestral circumstances, but that does not make those genes Jewish. It simply means that a group of people carry similar genes, such as a group of people carrying genes for blonde hair or blue eyes.Therefore, the labeling of certain genes as Jewish is done either out of ignorance or to serve an agenda. Since Jewish Supremacists consider themselves the chosen of a supposedly omnipotent God, it is most likely the latter because claiming that they have special genes serves to deem them as chosen on a genetic level. However, one can see that such a claim does not hold up under scientific scrutiny.https://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=573168
Jewry is a mental disease.
CAN SOMEONE FOR THE LOVE OF 'GOD' (MARA) PLEASE POINT OUT THE JEWISH GENETICS!?I'M PUTTING TOGETHER A LIST FOR THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS AND I NEED TO KNOW WHO ACTUALLY HAS JEWISH GENETICS SO I CAN HOLOCAUST 2.0 THEM!!!PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF THE 'GOD' (MARA) I NEED TO KNOW BECAUSE THESE 'JEWS' LOOK WHITE TO ME! I DO NOT WANT TO ACCIDENTALLY PUT ARYAN (WHITE) PEOPLE IN GAS CHAMBERS! I'M A MAN OF SCIENCE!PLEASE! WHERE ARE THE DIRTY FILTHY NIGGER KIKE GENETICS! AAAAAAHHHHHHHGGGGGGGG!!! I THINK I'M HAVING A SEIZURE BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE...NIGGER1!!!卍 The Four Aryan Truths 卐I. Suffering is inseparable from existence.II. Craving is the root cause of suffering.III. Suffering can be ended by ending craving.IV. There is a path to ending craving and suffering.ᛋ drive.google.com/file/d/1YxZS4v8-jlj-2CfpfDMPyk_6J0wqQBe_/viewComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>17512838>卍 The Four Aryan Truths 卐>thatmore like this:>>17511030
Based bump
One more purge bro, just one more great purge and we will finally clear the union of saboteurs and spies and live in a land of milk and Lysenkos tomato-potatos
>>17509781>>17511004‘Scuse me, fellow purge-aholics! How’s about we go ahead and purge our military right before attacking Finland? Cuz I’m thinkin’ that would be a heckin’ delectably dialectic decision! Comrade Lysenko will just plant some maple seeds and grow a new officer corps.
>>17508527>>17509594>>17509781And there still were all of them, except the small business, obviously. Society has been continuing to work without few purged. You're saying it in a way like USSR have killed everyone and there was an empty land. But it isn't, that's why even after wars and famines there's Russian people living in the country.
>>17511460Okay. So your point is what? That they only managed to kill or starve a few million to death? That some people survived? That the gulag system wasn’t 100% effective at exterminating prisoners? That not everyone ended up being shot as class traitors, reactionaries, wreckers, nationalists, spies, trotskyists, revisionists, traitors, pests, fascists, class enemies, or just quota fillers? Or is it that real communism hasn’t been tried since the per capita death rate wasn’t as good as Pol Pot’s, and there are still Cambodians alive?
>>17511460Yes anon society didn't collapse instantly so purging hundreds of thousands of people and torturing old Bolsheviks till they confessed to putting rusty nails in the workers butter was fine and good. Killing off any communist party member that showed the slightest amount of independence did not have any negative long lasting consequences.
>No way man you're totally hoarding grain I know you just gave us your entire surplus and we tore up your barn looking for more and didn't find any but you're definitely hiding grain.>Why are you getting defensive? Are you scared? Are you a wrecker? Are you a counterrevolutionary? I know you're hiding grain your neighbor already denounced you. How can you have 5 chickens and a goat you must be hiding something. Tell us where you're hiding the grain right now!
Genetically speaking, the distinction between European and MENA is very clear. Most North Europeans and South Europeans are closer to one another than either is to non-europeans. This is because all europeans overwhelmingly descend from the same North-Pontic Caspian Steppe Herders and the same Middle Neolithic European Farmers.
The only legitimate confusion in distinction are Jews really, who fall too intermediately between the two..
>>17513011That's because European Jews are a mixture of Italic women and Levantine men. Sicilians are a bit shifted in that direction due to a few instances of genetic interjection by Nafri and West Asians. Only a minor component of their overall genetic makeup but enough to shift slightly away from the rest of the continent.
So, is there any actual proof that this guy died/killed himself?
>>17512343communists did claim to have disposed of the remains they found.>>17512406actually it means he stayed till the very end with his people and fled after the war had concluded.how cuck are you to counter signal Hitler after he fought ZOG?
>>17512411that wasnt his dentist you moron it was some random guy who claimed to have seen his teeth.
>>17512063his 136th birthday is in about two monthsthus he's no longer alive
>>17512068That was conclusively proven as a woman’s skull many years back.https://phys.org/news/2009-09-hitler-skull-woman-scientists.ampYou fell for Russian propaganda. They made up that they killed him because the truth that he definitely survived looks bad for them.
>>17512268You know that you can get a doctor to recreate the exact contents of someone’s dental records, right?
HOW?!
>>17513053Soul vs Soulless