Never go full retard
who was in the right here?
>>18664373Cyprus, Armenia, and Latin Cōnstantīnopolis
>>18664373ERE, as proven by the modern state of the world
>>18664369
>>18664369>Wallachia and BulgariaThe state was called Bulgaria.
Jesus wants people to be punished for thought crime. That's evil.
Was Chester Nimitz really a Freemason?
Bring back calling historical figures involved in war members of the Illuminati
>>18664453MacArthur was a shriner
ITT anons post coats of arms and we guess who or what they represent. Starting with a hard one people didn’t get from the last thread.Other anons enjoyed this so I’m doing it again. Drop historical facts about the people and places they represent too.
Jews.
>>18664457Close but not quite. Pic rel is a hint.
Who are your favorite /his/ schizos? I’ll start:- That pro-Russia anon from /k/ who posts interracial gay porn just to go “this is you” whenever you shittalk Putin/Russia.- That whiny Muslim poster who constantly rails against “Zionists” (he probably came from Xitter honestly), but will never be overtly antisemitic.- That one refugee from /pol/ who constantly carried water for Trump and the GOP in every politics thread despite being an antisemite because he’s still stuck in 2017 apparently. I haven't seen him in a few months.- The anon who rails against another anon that he refers to as “Hasbara kike”, despite nobody else knowing who he’s talking about.- And of course, the “Enjoy Hell” poster.
>>18663625How do you guys recognize so many schizos here and where they're coming from to begin with? I only know of the usual spammers, cum genius, the paki ones, and the enjoy hell anon. I kinda like cum genius sometimes.
>>18663625The christcuckposters that spam walls of verses that have nothing to do with someone's question about a specific problem in christcuckianity.
>>18663674Do some people just not ignore shitty posts?Do they have to read everything and become familiar with everyone on here?
>>18663932>Do they have to read everything and become familiar with everyone on here?I mean the average thread has like 20 posts so it's not like you need much time to read it all
>>18663670Same.Dont you understand they have a higher civilizational potential that whites?lol
The Orthodox Christian Triune God is real. This has been proven philosophically to be the most coherent worldview paradigm by Dyerian Teleological TAG and has been undefeated in debate for 10+ years. Call in to the X space if you disagree. (You) are about to presuppose logic btw.
>>18661495Literally no reason to define terms in such a way that they need god-magic
Why should someone that leans nominalist be even remotely swayed by any of this?
>>18662547Conceiving logic as something which is itself transcendent in it's universality, ontologically, is the only way you get a transcendental argument with God as the unconditioned foundation of reality (which is the classical theism formulation of Aquinas/Avicenna). If you deny this, God becomes whatever definition you want equally valid and unproveable to all others, without this transcendental chain of causal being. Heraclitus/Whitehead denied this, by saying God is borrowing power from the universe as pure becoming. Kant denied this, by stating causation is a feature humans project onto reality. Moderate nominalism (or it's evolution by Habermas into it's social intersubjective form) is possibly a killshot for the God-concept if God can now be arguably material, immaterial, the force giving us logic, the force taking logic from us which is already inherent in the universe, and so on. Logic is the most stable thing we have so it is intuitive to give it a divine author. If it's equally possible however that God is "pure becoming" (Whitehead), infinite, emergent, or whatever else quality you want to borrow from our world, I don't see how this possibility does not make a God that can be defined in any and all directions which contradict themselves.
>chr*stianityLife is too short to occupy oneself with the slaying of the slain more than once.
>>18658942You believe in Christianity because of group identity. Facts and finding the truth have nothing to do with it.
Christianity is inherently left-wing / proto-Communist.Galatians 3:28>There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.Matthew 19:21>Jesus said to him, “If you wish to be complete, go and sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me.Acts 2:44>All the believers were together and had everything in common.If you're right-wing, you can't truly be a Christian.
Your very first prooftext directly refutes you
>>18664073That was a command given specifically to the rich young ruler, which was done to expose his pride and greed, refuting his claim to have satisfied the law. Nobody else is commanded to sell all they have and give the proceeds to the poor.
>>18664321Luke 14:33 >In the same way, any one of you who does not give up everything he has cannot be My disciple.Try actually reading the Bible sometime
>Try actually reading the Bible sometime
>>18664421Frankly it's embarrassing how many self-purported "Christians" on /his/ have clearly never actually read the New Testament (yourself included)
Free will is not real. You exist within the context of all that has come before you. Every choice you have made has been the consequence of circumstance beyond your own control.
>>18664333>If you 'freely' intended to choose 'dog', then the device didn't obstruct shit.It obstructed the choice. The end result might have been according to your wish, but your wish wasn't actually reflected. It's like claiming that the gun didn't "obstruct shit" if you survived Russian roulette. Only looking at the end result hides the very point of what had happened. There is no crash, you're just reducing the event to something from which the event cannot be actually understood and then you're implying it's the fault of people who offer the conceptual understanding. That's the fucky part.>Hence, source-talkAlong with choice-talk, yes.>brain-damage suddenly violently suppressing your choicesHere we come to a point where everything hinges on the meaning of "your". If your brain is affecting your choices, then that implies there is some self outside the brain. To a theist, that is fine. There is an immaterial soul with will and freedom and whatnot, and the brain fails to relay its bidding. Choice-talk, source-talk, deliberation and freedom, all are reconciled. But to a materialist, your brain affecting your choices is a riddle. Where is the you besides the brain? I'm not saying this is unsolvable, but I am saying the part that's "fucky" here is not in free will, it's in the ambiguity of the materialist "you".
>>18659036>your choices are determined by things that happened in the past OOOH SCARYThat's a good thing, dummy. Most of the time, the form that takes is you learning from past experience. For example you touch a hot stove, you experience pain, that rewires your brain to think touching hot stove = very bad, in the future you are more careful. That is all how things are supposed to work. If your choices are not bound by anything, then there's a real possibility of you deciding for literally no reason, with no motivation, to put your hand on a hot stove and keep it there.
>>18664344>It obstructed the choice>Only looking at the end result hides the very point of what had happened.By this logic, *everything* obstructs your choices. Even the butterfly effect.>Along with choice-talk, yes.Nope, since if we are discussing mechanisms behind the workings of the choice, bringing up the choice to explain choice would be begging the question.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question>If your brain is affecting your choices, then that implies there is some self outside the brain.No, it implies merely the language problem. A change in the brain ultimately changes the trajectory of this body's actions in time, that is all.'You' are even likely to deny 'you' have any problem or external influence at all.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18664385>By this logic, *everything* obstructs your choices.The logic is that if you aren't the one choosing, your choice is obstructed. I don't see that everything fits that criterion.>bringing up the choice to explain choice would be begging the questionIn which case source-talk is equally invalid, since it's about where/who got to choose. In the case of the husband, his wife. Also, I think the topic is free will, not just choice as a phenomenon.>language problemAgreed.>A change in the brain ultimately changes the trajectory of this body's actions in time, that is all.That seems to be the brain's function. So what is the materialist "you" here? The trajectory? Which I sense is a hyper cartesian way of saying "identity"?>>It can be reconciled via soul>Which makes a 'soul' a useless overloaded conceptThat it allows reconciliation is precisely a use. Though I agree souls do an insane amount of heavy lifting in all kinds of religious ideas.Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
corr >>18664426That's when *information needs to be conveyed to begin with...
I've seen Somali girls and Moroccan girls run for cover when they see this on Western streets, they hide and have a panic attack and start frantically reciting Quranic verses for protection against evil. Older Muslim women are even more disturbed by it. This is something completely foreign and alien to Muslims.Even Halloween is absolutely terrifying to Muslims. Muslims say "Audhubillah" and seal up their homes every Halloween and frantically recite Quran. European and American kids are just having fun and don't understand the fuss, but for Muslims this is something extremely serious and disturbing.
>>18664240Good. They should go back
>>18664240Is the furry phenomenom just a revival of old Paganism?
Will he ever cover the roman empire
>>18664355>>18664372Phone posting with little regard, pardon me grammar chuds.
>>18662145I'm not even a Chud, I'm actually more of a liberal than he is, but his editorializing is childish and shows how shallow his understanding of the events actually are. It's not even his personal asides, which were jarring when they started up, it's that he basically abandons all pretense at historiography after a certain point, and becomes more focused on trying to color your opinion of events before you even know the facts.
>>18664378Cicerowank is entry level romaboo stuff.
>>18664390>I'm not even a Chud, I'm actually more of a liberal than he islol, tiresome to see you libertarians use the same exact playbook for every conversation you have. You're as "classically liberal" as any lame despot that ever existed.
>>18664386But watch out, Nazis grammar are insecure.
He used to appear in person to various people in the Old Testament all the time, but now he's been gone for thousands of years. Will he come back and hang out in the Third Temple if it's built?
>>18663884>I can experience a place by seeing it through a picture on my computer
>>18663689At noon Anon began to make fun of them. “Pray louder!” he said. “If YHWH really is a god, maybe he is thinking, or busy, or traveling! Maybe he is sleeping so you will have to wake him!” The Christians prayed louder, cutting themselves with swords and spears until their blood flowed, which was the way they worshiped. The afternoon passed, and the Christians continued to act like this until it was time for the evening sacrifice. But no voice was heard; YHWH did not answer, and no one paid attention.
>>18663689He'll come back once you destroy all the iron chariots
>>18663689He ascended to the right hand of God, from which He will also return at the end of the age.
>>18663811>hallucinations from lack of oxygen to the brain means it must be ywhw and rabbi jewsus speaking to meKek
Notice that whenever you go somewhere on the internet that has some clips of nice scenery or views from mountains, relaxing waterfalls, etc, most of the comments from normal people say:>"Absolutely beautiful, let's all live in peace">"This is what the world should be, quiet, peaceful, let's wish for an end to all wars and conflict!">"Sooooo peaceful, imagine if the world was like this xx"But none of these types of comments are ever written by Muslims. Muslims don't believe in "peace" as long as there is still shirk/polytheism and enemies of Islam in the world. A Muslim feels disgusted to stand by side with a Christian, Atheist, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, and Sikh in the name of "coming together for peace". Misery, war, conflict, and starvation are simply normal facts of life in Islamic thinking. These are tests or punishments from Allah. When a genocide of Muslims occurs such as in Gaza or Bosnia, then Muslims call on the UN and the West for aid and help, but Muslims DO NOT demand an end to war and conflict in totality. There's no such thing as quiet melancholic peace, reflection and happiness as far as Muslims are concerned. You must always be prepared for death, war, famine, harshness and cruelty and always be aware of the enemies of Islam and NEVER hold hands with them.
>>18664140>clips of nice scenery or views from mountains, relaxing waterfalls>"Absolutely beautiful,">There's no such thing as quiet melancholic peace, reflection and happiness as far as Muslims are concerned.https://youtu.be/GufP3yPGKhw
>>18664140True. I don't want solutions, I want problems always. O wise sage
>>18664140>Notice that whenever you go somewhere on the internet that has some clips of nice scenery or views from mountains, relaxing waterfalls, etc, most of the comments from normal people say:>>"Absolutely beautiful, let's all live in peace">>"This is what the world should be, quiet, peaceful, let's wish for an end to all wars and conflict!">>"Sooooo peaceful, imagine if the world was like this xx">But none of these types of comments are ever written by Muslims. Muslims don't believe in "peace" as long as there is still shirk/polytheism and enemies of Islam in the world. A Muslim feels disgusted to stand by side with a Christian, Atheist, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, and Sikh in the name of "coming together for peace".>Misery, war, conflict, and starvation are simply normal facts of life in Islamic thinking. These are tests or punishments from Allah. When a genocide of Muslims occurs such as in Gaza or Bosnia, then Muslims call on the UN and the West for aid and help, but Muslims DO NOT demand an end to war and conflict in totality.>There's no such thing as quiet melancholic peace, reflection and happiness as far as Muslims are concerned. You must always be prepared for death, war, famine, harshness and cruelty and always be aware of the enemies of Islam and NEVER hold hands with them.
>>18664140We proud Pakistani Muslims hate peace. Peace is a lie. Peace is cowardice. Peace is weakness, and weakness is death!We value Chaos, war, suffering, death, destruction, and the complete upheaval of stable society in the name of eternal war.Praise be to Khorne (Allah)! Blood for the Blood God! Skulls for the Skull Throne!
>>18664376These sissified yeshu fiends with a punching bag god will be dealt with shortly.All hail Khorne
Why don’t you make flags?
Slop for piggies. Who's a good piggie?
>>18663483Upholstery is one of the five original industrial arts.
>>18663313I'm not a mariner so have no need for one.
>>18663817Invented by faggots for queers
>>18663483At this point it’s better to sew’s ones own clothes, unless you want to deal with the garbage fabric they are pumping out of other countries.
A middle-aged German man told me that all nations did evil things and that Greeks commited equally evil actions like them.Was he right, or was it a quick defensive judgement?
>>18659323Counterpoint: there are still German people alive today who remember the Greeks coming into their AO shooting the men and stealing the food and burning the posts
>>18659327>conscious genocide on an industrial scalebut this is false, multiple other conflicts had higher death tallies than Germany, and Germany never committed a genocide unless you want to admit Whites today are being genocided, thats the only definition that would condemn Germany.otherwise Germany was only waging a war.youre a lefty so you wont admit Germany's guilt if it means you have to admit the guilt of the orcs trying to annihilate Whites.>goalGermany had no goal to commit any genocide.Their movement of people was almost verbatim identical to the Soviet policies of (re)moving groups.>Leningrad blockadeYou mean the city under siege?Yes, you tend to starve out the defenders.What race was being genocided in Leningrad?It was a White city besieged by other Whites, so what race was going extinct here?>mind boggling evil of literally every siege everComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18660402leftroons get out
>>18664282Why are there more whites than ever? Some genocide...
>>18664282>Slavs>White
There is no wisdom in the Old Testament/Torah. It’s just a delusional reimagining of history by retards living in the desert. Many of the events it claims (garden of Eden, Tower of Babel, Noah’s Ark) are so retarded, that I genuinely look down on people who claim to believe in them. Like you gotta be an utter dumbfuck to think an old man put two of every animal on a boat for 40 days.
You’re a subhuman retard with less brains than a troon, who cares what you look down on?
>>18664292Prove it didn't happen without appealing the scientific establishment.
>>18664310>>18664317I’m not “debating”, I’m telling you how the fuck it is. The debate bro era is over, it’s time to start mocking judeo-christians for being retards.>durr debate me broSuck my dick, you’re shits retarded and you’re a moron for believing it. simple as
>>18664243>Chud AnonWhy make the bait obvious? Takes out all the fun.
>no arguments lol>...that was actually a request
