Larping Olympics
>you're a jew if you don't worship a jew>all my prophets are jews>my book says israel is favored above all nations>i circumcise my people>you're a jew if you don't join meLol.
>>18527230>ISRAEL IS THE CHURCH, NOT A NATIONNope, Israel was always a nation which comprises exclusively of those descended from Abraham which today only includes Jews and Samaritans. The Hebrew Bible states this countless times.
>>18527412Jesus never existed
>>18531369ALWAYS, UNTIL THE NEW COVENANT.ARE YOU AWARE OF A MAN CALLED «JESUS CHRIST», AND OF WHAT HE DID?
>>18528232Jew means anyone part of the ethnocult of YHWH only, tribal differences are meaninglessJews don't hate Christians, they just laugh at the faces of goyim who have a zionist rabbi as their deity and his jewish mother as the holiest figure>why don't they convert then?For the same reason a farmer doesn't eat the swill he feeds his pigs
>>18531375>OF A MAN CALLED «JESUS CHRIST», AND OF WHAT HE DID?The zionist rabbi who said goyim are akin to dogs and pigs? Who continuously said he came only from and for the jewish master race?Paul retcon of this zionist figure won't change facts, now back to eating your swill, pig
>Moses goes up alone on a mountain>comes back with stone tablets with laws that everyone has to follow now>says he got them from God>oh okay then>Hilkiah the High Priest does temple renovations>accidentally discovers the Book of Deuteronomy underneath a temple wall>coincidentally contains a bunch of laws people have to follow now>oh okay then>Maria >gets pregnant before marriage>actually God is the father, an angel told her about it>oh okay thenComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18531457>John’s knowledge of the pool of Bethesda, which he could know nothing about if he was a foreigner from a much later time.NTA but couldn't someone have known about it if they happened to visit Jerusalem at some point in the second century, even if they weren't from there? From wikipedia it looks like the Emperor Hadrian built a temple to Asclepius (god of healing) and Serapis over the best candidate for the pool of Bethesda in the 2nd century, so any earlier healing association would've been maintained. In fact from https://melkite.org/faith/sunday-scriptures/mystery-of-the-pool-at-bethesda and the wiki page, it's thought to have been a pagan sacred place even in the first century, and it was just outside Jerusalem until Herod Agrippa expanded Jerusalem to include it in the mid 1st century, so John saying "Now in Jerusalem there is a pool..." might only be implying knowledge of the location of the pool in Jerusalem after the expansion, not before the expansion when it would've been outside Jerusalem.
>>18531411>>18531452>>18531457You have no understanding of basic biblical scholarship.
>>18531591In Jerusalem means within the city and its environs.>>18531615Not an argument
>>18531457>John’s knowledge of the pool of Bethesda, which he could know nothing about if he was a foreigner from a much later timeRather than there being a foreigner called "John" who pretended to be an apostle, it's more likely the gospel of John is a collection of oral stories about Jesus that got collected by the local Christians in those foreign cities like Antioch and Rome.The "John" as an apostle authorship was slapped on later in order to give the gospel more credibility. Early church fathers tried to unify the faith by creating a unified scripture and they picked the most popular and coherent gospels from around the Roman empire, where early Christians were congregating.Christian sects kept making up new gospels that didn't make it into the new testament by the way. We have quite a few from the 2nd century. Early christians seemed to have a vivid imagination.
>check out my fanfic collection about jesus
If your country's governing ideology explicitly demands the subversion and overthrow of your neighbours, why WOULN'T they be hostile torwards yours? Surely you don't have to be a dedicated anti-ideologue to realize this.
>>18531402>Implying they won’t get jailed as soon as they set foot on CubaThe best thing the US can do is invade Cuba and be done with that whole issue.
Stupid fuck. Cuba follows the stalinist ideology of "revolution in one country".
>>18531672They supported other communists during the cold war and communism itself seeks the overthrow of capitalism worldwide The only way to not be a national security threat is to not be communist at all.
>>18531672Then why did they send thousands of troops to spread the revolution in Africa?
>>18531402>it’s a waste of moneyHow specifically? Remember an embargo isn't a blockade. What specifically is being "spent". Embargo means America doesn't trade with Cuba. Cuba can easily trade with any nation it wants.
1. Scripture can't take precedence over apostolic Tradition. The Biblical Canon was only compiled in the late 300s, and the decision of which books to include had to rely on 3 centuries of apostolic Tradition. Scripture also can't be the only source of Revelation because that would mean God has deprived His followers from access to His truth for centuries.2. Jesus Christ explicitly said that St. Peter would lead his Church and he would have the authority to bind and loose from earth to heaven (Matthew 16:18-19). St. Peter became the first bishop of Rome and the popes are his successors. This view was widely accepted on Christendom, even among the Orthodox churches although they claimed he was just "first among equals," what is obviously a cope to anyone from an outside perspective.3. The Protestant Bible is missing 7 books in the Old Testament because they have been rejected by Jews some 1 or 2 centuries after the ministry of Jesus Christ. There wasn't a consensus on the Jewish canon during the times of Jesus and those deuterocanonical books were present in the 3rd-2nd century BC Septuagint, the famous Greek translation of the Tanakh, used as source material by the writers of the New Testament and early Christians.4. The Bible-only doctrine naturally leads to the path of fundamentalist interpretation, but current scientific findings challenge a literalist understanding of the Bible. It's is known that the earth is not flat. It's in known that species evolve. It's is known that there are some historicity problems in some books of the Bible. The Catholic Church rejects fundamentalist interpretation, in favor of considering the context, genre, and limitations of human authors. The Scripture is divinely inspired but it was not divinely dictated word-for-word (The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church, Pope John Paul II, 1993: section I, F) (Catechism 109-119).
>>18532073>Declining to state your positionFirst of all it is, if you asked me if I was a theist and I replied I don't believe in gods intending to hide the fact that I believe in the God (uncountable) you'd be right to say I was pretending to be an atheist. This is also called cowardice because you know your own arguments always shoot you in the foot. Which is exactly what we see in this thread where I have demonstrated your reasons for denying the oral Torah if applied consistently will make you deny the written Torah. This is why you refuse to challenge that and you're now going in a circle as you usually do when you have nothing. And it's really funny you're saying that considering you were the one giving people "tests" by asking them blaspheme. btw nice tactic I've exposed many larping Christians with Mark 3:29>religious teachings/divine revelationThose are not divinely inspired religious teachings nor the defining characteristics of the Pharisees, they are legal loopholes to sidestep the law as mentioned. It doesn't explain why Jesus singles them out nor does it explain why he is explicitly in favor of their law. He even names what they name themselves as tithe plants https://www.sefaria.org/Mishnah_Demai.2.1?lang=bi https://www.sefaria.org/Mishnah_Maasrot.4.5?lang=bi and more generally the rule that applies to mint https://www.sefaria.org/Mishnah_Sheviit.9.1?lang=bi
>>18532435>I have demonstrated your reasons for denying the oral Torah if applied consistently will make you deny the written TorahWe're not going to veer off the subject. That's the #1 thing I've learned with you. You always try to bounce away from uncomfortable direct questions (Jinn, Two Horn, Aisha being a little girl) and onto other topics. This will not be taking place. With you it's important to stick to one single clearly defined claim. Otherwise you'll find some sort of "inclusive 'or'" or "Aisha had female pattern baldness" to try and grasp onto for post after post after post.Right now the single, specific subject is your claim that Matthew 23 says "you're disobeying Jesus by disobeying their religious teachings". Once we reach an agreement on this specific point, then we can move forward. Otherwise it'll be an "inclusive 'or'" and no progress will be made.On that specific subject, you say:>Those are not divinely inspired religious teachingsIn other words: Jesus does not say that because they teach something that that which they have taught is therefore divine revelation.
>>18532544>claims he does not want to change subjects>doesn't respond to anything brought up (even the ones you said you will respond to ITT)>brings up irrelevant straw man bullshit to try and do just that>leaves the earlier conversation mid way and samefags as a "gentleman" the way he always doesCan you do anything else beside blatantly lie and run? This is why you're always forced to do things like go against those you claim to be your greatest theologians and even those who you claim have apostolic teachings. Like with all christcuck apologists you're just a hypeman here for the audience.>In other words: Jesus does not say that because they teach something that that which they have taught is therefore divine revelationWho made the claim that everything they speak is divine revelation? You did! I just demonstrated to you how your insistence on them being mere legal judges fails and how he actually explicitly approves of their oral laws.You of course just strawman because you can never deal with the point being made.
>>18532559>>leaves the earlier conversation mid way and samefags as a "gentleman" the way he always doesYou brought up Mark 3:29 earlier so here, the Holy Ghost as my witness and I blaspheme him if I am lying: that anon wasn't me.>Who made the claim that everything they speak is divine revelation?So everything they speak is not divine. As such, based what we've seen so far:-Many of their teachings are false-Many of their traditions are false-Many of their ideas are falseAnd Jesus affirms this. So how can it be that "you're disobeying Jesus by disobeying their religious teachings" if many of their religious teachings are false and Jesus explicitly says this and not to follow them?>your insistence on them being mere legal judges failsWhen Moses had others sit in his seat, what was it for?Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>18532563>Mark 3:29 lmao that doesn't work I've already exposed you to be a christcuck. claiming you will blaspheme is not the same as actually blaspheming and then having to endure eternal damnation according to your book. You're a blatant deceiver and nothing you say can be trusted.>So everything they speak is not divineYep because those are not religious teachings! So what percentage of the Pharisaic tradition is false? Give me a reasonable number. Your other persona couldn't do it. Can you under your prottie namefag persona? It's pretty clear that nothing that goes against the law like attempts to trick God with false oaths would not be included here. You're claiming that legal loopholes are religious teachings which is ridiculous >When Moses had others sit in his seat, what was it for?See pic >>18531148>We'll look at that after we finish with your argument about Matthew 23What? Right now I am referencing Matthew 23:23 I showed you that already and explained it how he's affirming their oral Laws >>18532435
>Leland Morris served as the American chargé d'affaires in Germany beginning October 1940; the US had not had a full ambassador in Berlin since Hugh Wilson was recalled by President Roosevelt in November 1938 for being excessively cozy with the Nazi regime, even attending the annual Nuremberg rally two months earlier.>Germany declared war on the United States December 11, 1941, three days after the US declaration of war on Japan. Morris was summoned to the office of Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop, who read the declaration of war aloud and yelled "Your president wanted his war, now he has it!" The US diplomatic corps was detained at a resort in Bad Nauheim. While they had a comparatively high degree of freedom of movement, the diplomats were poorly fed and suffered from malnourishment. They were transferred to neutral Portugal in May 1942 and then to the US on the liner SS Drottningholm where they were exchanged for German prisoners.>Morris later served as the first US ambassador to Iceland and Iran and passed away in Washington D.C. in 1950.
>>18531161>Morris was summoned to the office of Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop, who read the declaration of war aloud and yelled "Your president wanted his war, now he has it!"You declared war first, not the other way around, my good sir.
>>18531161>The US diplomatic corps was detained at a resort in Bad NauheimThey couldn't even send them to Good Nauheim?
>designed in 1943>built in 1944>deployed in 1945>dominated in Korea>dominated in Suez, only losses occurred due to anti tank mines>dominated in Israel (twice) against tanks ten years younger>dominated in Vietnam against tanks fifteen years younger >dominated in Pakistan against Pattons>dominated in South African border wars>survived a literal fucking nuke Tell me with a straight face Britain didn’t make the greatest tank of all time by every metric
>>18530854That's just canada
>>18530955RED COMONOWHEALTH
>>18530152Goddamnit, Bongs, you had ONE job and you … admittedly did it pretty well. Upgraded derivatives of these things are still in service. Looks so friggin cool.
I don't care about meta, the best tank design goes tobthie bad boy. I'll never forgive the french to lose so fast so we could'nt see more of it in action or be copied. Imagine a world where the average radio operator tank crewman handle a fucking howitzer instead of a Browning. KINO.
>>18531481>howitzer has zero traverse>is actually aimed by the driver by shifting the entire tank side to side>using a needlessly complicated pneumatic transmission >promptly breaks down>krauts just drive around it
>AAAAAAAAA THIS IS SCARY AND UNCANNY AAAAAAAAADid boomers really?
>>18529550It's dystopian from women's perspective and utopian from men's
>>18529629>>18529893>Is..is Ira Levin Jewish?!?!? ARRRRRRGGGHHHHH I'M LOSING MY FUCKING MIND!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>18529907The Jews are ontologically evil. They are responsible for much of the world's suffering. They are also infamous throughout all human history for being pathological liars. Nothing good and true can ever come from them.
>>18530099Hi Hitler when did you come back from the dead
bump
Historically speaking why did the British working class develop such a violent and distinctive culture compared to continental europe?While the continental working classes were mostly subdued and servile the british working class was historically brutish and violent and gave us boxing, football hooliganism, etc.
We're now on the 26th day of my daily presidents threads celebrating the 250th anniversary of the USA.Today we have William Howard Taft (9/15/1857 - 3/8/1930), who served as president from 1909 to 1912 after being convinced by Roosevelt to run for office. He later served as the 10th Chief Justice of the USA from 1921 to a month before his death in 1930. Prior to the presidency he had been the solicitor general, a judge in the court of appeals, governor of the Philippines/Cuba, and the secretary of war. Notable actions or events during his presidency include Dollar Diplomacy, the 16th and 17th Amendments, the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act, the Mann-Elkins Act, the Wireless Ship Act of 1910, the Defense Secrets Act, the Radio Act of 1912, the Commission on Economy and Efficiency, the Occupation of Nicaragua, Antitrust Lawsuits against U.S. Steel, Standard Oil, and the American Tobacco Company, the Ballinger-Pinchot Affair, the Mexican Revolution, and the 1911 Revolution in China.What do you think of the fat fuck who got stuck in the bathtub?
>Taft reluctantly signed the Payne-Aldrich bill into law and immediately drew the ire of progressives, mainly in the Midwest. The president further demonstrated his poor political judgement in the aftermath. He might have said he was sorry and it was the best he could do, but instead embarked on a nationwide speaking tour where he defended the bill and called it "the best bill the Republican Party has ever passed.">A staunch conservationist, Taft did more to protect natural areas than Roosevelt; he created the Bureau of Mines to control mineral resources, rescued huge areas of the West from development, and protected water power sites from industrial use. But this was all undone by the Pinchot-Ballinger fiasco. Interior Secretary Ballinger, a plant of big capital, promptly opened public land in Wyoming, Montana, and Alaska to development. Gifford Pinchot, head of the Agriculture Department's Division of Forestry and a staunch Roosevelt ally, denounced him. Taft fired Pinchot for insubordination, outraging Roosevelt allies and conservationists.
>Roosevelt made his return to New York in June 1910 and immediately stirred up a tempest. He traveled to Kansas and made a fiery stump speech calling on the government to have increased powers to remedy economic and social ills. The divided GOP was routed in the midterms that fall, giving the Democrats 228 House seats and putting them back in charge of the House for the first time in 17 years. As a sign of the times, Victor Berger of the Socialist Party was elected to Wisconsin's 5th Congressional District, encompassing the city of Milwaukee. The GOP held the Senate but precariously.
>>18530263>>18530398...And President Taft, he got the bill
>>18531052lmao.
>Taft's problems were compounded by the abortive Reciprocal Treaty with Canada, which would have proposed to establish a free trade zone between the two countries. House Speaker "Champ" Clark of Missouri, a folksy orator of the old school, whose constituents' general educational level was summed up by their phrase "Don't be kickin' mah dawg around", made an unwise and provocative remark that the treaty would be the first step to eventual annexation of America's northern neighbor. The Canadian elections in the fall of 1911 brought about a new government and prime minister who immediately ripped up the Reciprocal Treaty.
>Perhaps a remark on the universal success of the Diary of Anne Frank may stress how much we all wish to subscribe to this business-as-usual philosophy, and to forget that it hastens our destruction. It is an onerous task to take apart such a humane, such a moving story that arouses so much compassion for gentle Anne Frank. But I believe that the worldwide acclaim of her story cannot be explained unless we recognize our wish to forget the gas chambers and to glorify the attitude of going on with business-as-usual, even in a holocaust. While the Franks were making their preparations for going passively into hiding, thousands of other Jews in Holland and elsewhere in Europe were trying to escape to the free world, the better to be able to fight their executioners. Others who could not do so went underground—not simply to hide from the SS, (...) but to fight the Germans, and with it for humanity. (...) Little Anne, too, wanted only to go on with life as usual (...) But hers was certainly not a necessary fate, much less a heroic one; it was a senseless fate. (...) Any other course would have meant not merely giving up the beloved family life as usual, but also accepting as reality man’s inhumanity to man. (...) There is little doubt that the Franks, who were able to provide themselves with so much, could have provided themselves with a gun or two had they wished. They could have shot down at least one or two of the SS men who came for them. There was no surplus of SS men. The loss of an SS with every Jew arrested would have noticeably hindered the functioning of the police state. The fate of the Franks wouldn’t have been any different, because they all died anyway except for Anne’s father, though he hardly meant to pay for his survival with the extermination of his whole family. They could have sold their lives dearly instead of walking to their death.-Bruno BettelheimGive recommendations on what gun the birthday girl could have used to defend herself with
>>18529164Think again nigger
>>18527633Browning M2.>>18529952Loving, healthy couples share burdens and cooperate. Manning a crew served heavy machine gun to mow down fascist murderers is a healthy relationship building activity.
>>18531252Based Ma Deuce enjoyer
>>18529164She wanted big buck confederate >>>/aco/9213398
>>18527633Oh comely
How do atheists and prots explain eucharistic miracles, which have been confirmed by scientists?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eucharistic_miracle_of_Lancianohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eucharistic_miracle#Scientific_analysis_of_flesh_and_blood_miracles
>>18519443The fact that these relics look so disgusting, and obviously dead, already tells me they're not anything divine.
>>18528089>I can accept these criticisms.Then...what exactly is left? It's simply a reliquary that became the subject of tall tales almost 1000 years later.
>>18531180NTA but: >>18529608>>18529607>>18529609
>>18529608link the study
has this been found at any other denomintaion?
Jamboys were not real, but the 'rawalpindi experiments' certainly werehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rawalpindi_experiments
>>18531420those dasterdly britishers!
No, both real. Rule Britannia!
>humans evolved elaborate facial movement to convey emotions>cats are more expresive than 100% of normies what did God mean by giving a greater degree of soul to cats than coons?
WE EMOTE NATURALLY; EMOTION IS NOT AN «EVOLVED» FACULTY.
>>18531259God doesn't exist. Cats evolved blindly. Humans took care of cats that were cute and Fluffy and had more human characteristics. Cats have co evolved with humans and their very biology has evolved to be compatible with humans
Obviously the logical answer is god is a cat.
>humans evolvedstopped there
>>18531460Evolution is directly observed and mathematically proved. The spiderman comic comparison only works when compared to the bible, not the origin of species.
Did you know that there was an attempt to establish the Kerry Blue Terrier as Ireland's national dog breed?
I always liked Kerry Blues because they remind me of the very distinctive hairstyle found in Gaelic Ireland, known as the glib; where the hair the back was kept shaved/short whilst the top and front was grown long.
>>18530253Some sources say Normans introduce glib
>>18530415Interesting, which ones? I've only ever seen it referenced by sources describing it as distinctively Irish, I think I remember a Scottish source referring to certain highland scots dressing/wearing their hair in "the irish style" but I'd not be surprised if some of the later FitzGerald troops wound up resembling typical Gaelic soldiers.
>>18530251cute
I like doggies
