A fascinating social experiment was conducted in 1996. Researchers showed gay porn to homophobic and non homophobic men. The results:>Both groups exhibited increases in penile circumference to the heterosexual and female homosexual videos. Only the homophobic men showed an increase in penile erection to male homosexual stimuli. The groups did not differ in aggression. Homophobia is apparently associated with homosexual arousal that the homophobic individual is either unaware of or denies.>SOURCE???https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8772014/What's your next cope?
no? i'm surprised at how many people still hold onto outdated 80s stereotypes of gay men that don't really apply to zoomlennials. walking around in a Mr. Slave costume fingering dudes buttholes in a leather parade was a boomer gay thing, and it wasn't even specifically a gay behavior, but a boomer behavior because the mentality in that generation was just to be as edgy as possible and test the limits of what you could get away with, and both straight and gay people back then were degenerate as fuck. zoomlennial gays are much less degenerate and inclined to monogamy.
>>18166938retarded spam bot. I can say random words too
>>18164877Found the homophobe
>>18164886>>18164936>>18165573>>18166129Another homophobe post
>>18167658gay identity IS homophobia. People can do what they want without being labeled genetic defective. Both genetic and parasite wormpill beliefs rest on the assumption that homosexuality is terrible and no rational person would do it.
Why is it so controversial to say they were greek and not roman?
>>18162794The Romans colonized them heavily, I assume. I think there was a phase in Rome when it was very popular to speak Latin and Greek, and there was a phase before this where it was popular to speak Latin and Etruscan, but then later on people stopped teaching their children their native tongue and just became greek. But they were hellenic latinos.
>>18167361You ignore that it is a perfect example of how the people of the empires own core territories no longer considered the government in Constantinople legitimate. However cynically or insincerely they may have been in calling themselves Romans is irrelevant. It proves the Anatolian state no longer had any kind of better claim to imperial suzerainty than any other post-Roman successor state. The very fact that other powers post-Arab conquests stop referring to the Byzantines as Romans or as "The" Empire demonstrates that it lacked any kind of even vestigial recognition. Compare Odoacer who still had to at least pretend that he was totally still an imperial subject. At that point the Byzantines claiming to be "Rome" is just bog-standard legitimacy farming the same as how every monarchy in history has claimed to be a totally unbroken continuation of a previous more prestigious state, be they Chines dynasties or German Kings of England claiming to be the same as the Norman Kings of England claiming to be the same as the Anglo-Saxon Kings of England claiming to be the same as the Celtic King Arthur.
>>18167381Chinks are indistinguishable from each others in look, architectures, values, language ecc.So they can LARP as as they want. A bunch of greeks and hellenized armenians (both J2 jeets) LARPING as R1b Italians are a whole different issues
Kinda funny how the catholics called them greeks but once they took over constantinople they also started lapping as romans, almost in conflict with the holy roman emperor.
>>18167614>You ignore that it is a perfect example of how the people of the empires own core territories no longer considered the government in Constantinople legitimateThese people also have not existed under Roman rule for over 300 years and many of them didn't even consider themselves to be Roman. There are people who had living memory of living under the Roman state, likely being their grandfathers and during the 6th century these elites flocked to Justinian when he came knocking. Why would people after that, with no memory at all of any Roman rule and had already reconciled their part under a different state consider Byzantium, a state they had absolutely no ties or contact with for literal centuries, to be legitimate? This is like saying that because nobody in Egypt today recognises the Mamluk Sultanate as a legitimate state, that means it was never one to begin with.>It proves the Anatolian state no longer had any kind of better claim to imperial suzerainty than any other post-Roman successor state.Being Roman is not based on how much power you can project. That's a completely arbitrary measure.>The very fact that other powers post-Arab conquests stop referring to the Byzantines as Romans or as "The" Empire This isn't true>At that point the Byzantines claiming to be "Rome" is just bog-standard legitimacy farming the same as how every monarchy in history has claimed to be a totally unbroken continuation of a previous more prestigious stateExcept it did. There is no rupture in state institutions or politics from Rome to Byzantium until 1204. There was no external conquest of the state, there was no changing of identity, no dissolution of state institutions. Your comparison is nonsense. It would be no different from an 11th century English king claiming to be the same state as 8th century Wessex, because they were and had no rupture in political continuity like what the Normans had.
The existance of abbos debunks creationism.
Here are some better pics of an actual Aboriginal Skull. Not that remarkable. Thicker brow, and deeper temples, but otherwise pretty unremarkable.
>>18166063now show a cross section of that incredible thiccness
>>18164672There were a set of people (human beings) that went from Africa to Australia and those became the predominant genes thereafter on that continent.Maybe the people that left to Australia looked a bit different, and maybe they were even shunned by their tribe for looking a bit different. It doesn’t mean that they are a different species.
>>18166040Just look at the live ones. That skull is very much representative of Australian aboriginal phenotypes
>>18164304
Are north western europeans even white
>>18167618no
I hate how when philosophers conclude that a singular creator deity has philosophical support, Christcucks try to use every mental gymnastic possible to claim that this means Christianity is correct.Like, you do realize that it doesn’t specifically prove your religion correct, it just debunks atheism and polytheism? Other monotheistic religions like Islam or even Zoroastrianism could just as well claim that this proves their religion correct.Hell, why not just disregard all these religions and just say a singular creator deity having philosophical support proves Deism correct? After all, Deism is more rational and logical than most religions and was historically a more common form of “irreligiousness” than atheism. It was the belief of many enlightenment-era thinkers and even the US founding fathers.
>>18167491Answer my question, why are you so angry? I'm deliberately not reading the thread so you have to explain it.
>>18167516NTA but I'll take it from here. He's completely right and I will not elaborate. Stay mad though!
>>18164581>>18164581Abrahamism is just formalised lying through scripture and pilpul. It's the group strategy of Afro-Asiatic peasants written down.
>>18167327You are brown.
>>18167565NTA. Bet you feel dumb now.
Is the current Idea of 6 cradles of civilization inaccurate? There seems to be so many exceptions, we know now that there was an incredibly ancient amazon civilization that was potentially even older than andean civilization, there was the mound builders of midwestern north america, there was easter island, Hawaii, there was highly organized massive societies in very ancient europe, etc, it seems like a massive stretch or an oversimplification to say that all of these civilizations directly descended from these 6 locations.
>>18166134Who are you quoting, thing people say is that there wasn't any civilization until Greece and Rome
>>18161184>doesn't include Atlantis
>>18166440https://youtu.be/wUYhtJINiaY?si=_YCUtj_RcK8KB66qHave you seen this interview between monty python and some christian leadership? One of the guys says that the death of christ is the beginning of western civilization, and some it has also been a common talking point on /pol/. I advocate for dejewifying the white mans worldview. And I believe if they can fake the holocaust and lie about it for generations, they might be lying about much else.
>>18166440he didn't quote anybody newfag>>18166134indeed, the cosmos was silent til Spaniards awoke!
>>18166134I love how when nobody says something like this, you fags show up and say it anyway just to get mad at something. Amazing.
>SJW>Bros out with Clarence Thomas and the Koch brother who's still alive>Gives Shelby Foote the largest screen in his Civil War series when his extended cast included Morgan Freeman
Saars, why was Bharat considered the crown jewel of the Britisher Empire?
>>18167371>other than Canada, Australia and NZ.But saar why didn't any of these get considered the crown jewel?
>>18167367It made a fucking ton of money. Singlehandedly fueled both world wars. I don't think they thought much of Indians but having 400 million peasant workers and access to a ton of tropical goods is a good revenue source.
>>18167371>>18167406He's lying, India was far more profitable than Australia, NZ or Canada.
>>18167406i dunno nigga
>>18167426It didn't say profitable, I said productive. India was largely a state for extraction, the settler colonies were not and instead required investment which eventually was done by themselves when they could afford to do so. Infrastructure projects in India were massive, but the cost was offset by extraction. This still doesn't make them more productive, there was simply just far more people.
Catholics engage in goddess worship. I don't care how they try to slice it with their empty "veneration" claims. They kneel before her statue, they always prioritize her over Jesus Christ Himself, she's always the FIRST one they run to in prayer. All they ever care about is Mary. Nothing else enters their brain in relation to God if Mary isn't included. It's borderline sick. >Inb4 "YOU'RE JUST A LE PROTESTANT" No, fuck you. The Marian dogmas are simply a sick joke to service a fertility goddess idol, exactly like the pagans of old.
>>18167338>Mary as the ideal virgin mother chosen by God was a near necessary prerequisite for her to bear Christ.Source: marys cunt
>>18167366Luke 1 is clear about Mary's character.
I was at an Orthodox mass recently and it kinda felt like both Mary and Jesus were just an afterthought, it was ALL about god the father
>>18167411>HomodoxGood you admitted you are gay.
>>18167417Tell me your particular denomination so I can demonstrate how it's gayer than orthodoxy
What are some major historical outcomess that happened in our timeline that were highly unprobable and not how history would usually go?
Doomsday preacher claiming he was divine #32991 got executed for heresy just like all the rest but people REALLY latched onto his particular teachings
>compulsive masturbator>loved a hooker>slapped and leapfrogged over peopleSeriously, what was his angle?
>>18166488He has gooner eyes kek
>>18166488>>compulsive masturbator>>loved a hooker>>slapped and leapfrogged over people>Seriously, what was his angle?
He was french. Mystery solved
>>18166488>Oldenburg Just German stuff.>>18167219Nice try, Herr Schmidt.
>>18166488>>loved a hooker>>18166494>He has gooner eyes
Make it make sense.
>>18166940Puny Jesus is only worshipped by puny humans we Kryptonians know that there's only one Marvel superhero who's the Strongest One There Is surpassing Doomsday and the genius of Latveria's king Dr. Doom who created him
>>18166949>>18166951I agree Norse paganism is my religion as well but do you really think good guys like Thor really stand any chance against Hulk who became literal Satan for Marvel's new storylines as The One Below All? Even Beyonder could sense that Bruce Banner's alter ego had infinite power that surpassed him
>>18166940Maybe the real Jesus was the heretics we killed along the way :)
>>18166961>paganism>"Yeah man my sexuality is gay faggotry and my political orientation is communist traitor."Why use the disparaging language of your opponents? Pagan in religious contexts is a slur for the country bumpkins who weren't Christian.
>>18166951>>18166961I like superheroes and some of these stories are good but capitalist corporations mostly churn out awful propaganda slop, at least in my country. I wish our comic industry evolved more like the manga industry. It is cool we have heroes over a hundred years old now THO. Also Marvel Thor has unironically probably beaten all those characters like 3+ times. Thor still lives. He survived ragnarok. Surprisingly, Odin/Woden made it too. God(s) bless.
Trying to get some sort of action out of Halleck from an impatient administration in this January 1862, McClellan wired Halleck if he might not conduct a march against part of Johnson's forces in western Tennessee, a demonstration of sorts. Halleck replied that he could spare not more than 10,000 troops for such a venture; most of the army he had in Missouri was poorly equipped and its officers unreliable. Further, Missouri was an unstable state beset by guerilla warfare, secessionist plotters, and possible Confederate armed invasion, and he needed every man he could get. Halleck said that if told to send troops to Tennessee, he would obey the order but cautioned that doing so result in the loss of Missouri for the Union. He added that marching across the enemy front led to disaster in almost every case it was tried. Lincoln scribbled a gloomy note on his message - "As everywhere, there is nothing to be done."Nonetheless, things were moving. The administration had long obsessed over the idea of planting a Union army in eastern Tennessee, an area with strong Unionist support, and possible thousands of new army recruits. Most of the generals could not see the strategic value of such a move, and the logistics problems with it were vexing. Only George Thomas, one of Buell's division commanders, seemed to believe it was possible. At Mill Springs, Kentucky, the right end of Johnson's line, a small force under Swiss-born general Felix Zollicoffer, was not anchored to anything. Thomas put his division into column and set out to get it.
The weather was vile and the muddy roads delayed his advance, but on January 19 Thomas's division clashed with Zollicoffer, over whom the more experienced George Crittenden was put in command instead. In a sharp little fight with about 10,000 total men on the field, the Confederates were driven back in retreat with around 240 casualties and Zollicoffer was killed, although some of the reason for the Union victory was that many of the Confederates were armed with old flintlock muskets that wouldn't fire in the damp weather. George Crittenden was court-martialed for drunkenness and derelicition of duty, and the Union had won its first significant battlefield victory of the war. Thomas, however, seeing the horrible roads and the desolation of the country he was to march in, halted there. A large amount of Confederate supplies were seized, including tons of flour and sugar, and the Union soldiers used it to make flapjacks, eventually eating so many of them that many men came down with severe digestive issues.George Thomas would say later in the war that he could have taken East Tennessee right then and there if he'd had enough reinforcements, but he didn't have them and so that was that.
Disregarding the God claim, is Christianity's tenets even worth following? It has never helped me personally, all that much.
>>18164751>>Slaves, obey your masters>Is as explicitly condoning of slavery as any sentiment can get.Many of these early Christians WERE slaves, not slave masters. The message is to bring peace by focusing on the spiritual not material and on harmony, not conflict.You'd be the best slave because you uncritically parrot cultural memes without examining the deeper context behind anything. You'd be the first to raise your hand, proud you know the right answer, and say "I need to be a slave because of the mission to civilize"
>>18165399>"Many Christians were slaves and that's why Christ himself thought slavery was acceptable!"Sounds like your Messiah didn't actually care about the suffering of his followers beyond as a means of exploiting them into buying into his blood cult.
>>18163796According to the Bible, the whole point of Christianity is that Christ rose from the dead. And being literally, physically resurrected, in the same way that He was, is the promise that Christians are looking forward to. See 1 Corinthians 15:12-32.
>>18163796>DEUS VULT
>>18163796>disregarding the main point>is thing still worth following??? Statements of the utterly deranged. Read Mere Christianity by CS Lewis.
Childhood is viewing National Socialism with sympathy. Adulthood is understanding Chancellor Hitler was one of the most evil men to ever live
>>18167151>Normal peopleDiscord trannies on disposer fetish servers with hammer and sickle avatars are not "normal people" dumb /pol/troon.
>>18167172Yeah like white people never commit crimes right?
>>18167189>wypiperu..comitu crime-uh...Just go back Kim. We have enough non whites here as it is.
Childhood is idolizing Hitler for his economic policies and revitialization of German culture. Adulthood is idolizing him for shoahing 6 gorillion kikes
>>18167170>>18167230Childhood's hating him for the 6 gorillion kikesAdulthood's hating him for completely destroying Prussian culture (not the entirety of Germany which was saved due to Charlemagne's legacy which includes France and the entirety of Italy's history after Justinian) and for his loss which was the only reason why they wrongfully blamed for these 6 gorillion kikes who actually killed themselves like Epstein because despite being more racist than white people especially Germans that many black people like Ye that loved them unlike any other European colonial power during WW1 these Holocaust "victims" weren't fit for slave labor if they were then they would've been used for sex just like those who lived in the Confederate States of America
