Two weeks more: the ideology
>>17427468That's not the argument you want to make when trying to side with the soviet's, retard.
>>17428619Yeah, it’s honestly probably half the world.
>>17427209Why are communist regimes so easy to overthrow?
Reminds me of this chart.
>>17428021This is just the population of third world countries growing.
where is it
at the bottom of your medication bottle, probably
Honestly, if I had to pick one dude to blame for the Russian Revolution, it’s gotta be Lenin. If the tsar’s goons had just offed him when they had the chance, none of this garbage would have gone down. Just saying.
>Honestly, if I had to pick one dude to blame for the Russian Revolution, it's gotta be the leader of the Russian Revolution
Honestly, if I had to pick one dude to blame for the Holocaust, it's gotta be Hitler.
>>17438191it would have still happened with or without lenin
>>17438191How do you prevent the Tsar from dying? Then what?
>>17439668Why prevent it?Just have a democratic system instead of a totalitarian one after it.
The obvious superiority of Pagan value systems over Judaic Christian morality lies in its exaltation of boldness and pride. To quote Nietzsche, “Egoism is the very essence of a noble soul.” >Christianity teaches us to beg and plead, asking and hoping for our wishes to be granted by a cruel and miserly Jewish God whom we must submissively thank with gratitude like pathetic cuckolds even if he punishes us in return for our prayer by killing our entire family in a fire >Paganism instead emphasises concepts like magic, sorcery and divination, placing the power in the hands of the Pagan, allowing him to manifest his individual Will, allowing him agency. Whether by magic or by kinetic force, he manifests what he wants and takes it without asking or apologisingA Hellenistic focus may emphasise values like achievement in the arts and intellectual fields as a pursuit of ideal human excellence. A Roman Neopagan cultural revival on the other hand may consist of a more militaristic, warlike, competitive and aggressively ambitious culture. What do you think? (Asking for the opinions of real people only, not christcucks)
>>17441318>>17441414
>>17441318>>17441414>>17441418
>>17441318>>17441414>>17441418>>17441420
>>17441318>>17441414>>17441418>>17441420>>17441422
>>17441364Mate, Plotinus is analogizing Zeus as Nous at one time and as Soul at another. He says so himself. When he is discussing the generation of the Soul by the Intellect, Zeus is always strictly Psyche. Zeus can be seen as both Intellect and Soul because both occupy a role as the principle of unity in the cosmos, and he is the steward of the universe in mythology.How are you THIS illiterate?
Any sort of mass migration to Europe either from the Middle East or Africa or South Asia would not have happened without colonialism.
*Jewsftfy
>>17440036rofl
>>17439897>Indians, Nigerians in the UK, Moroccans and Turks in NetherlandsAll of these are from the former colonized countriesUK colonized all of Desi and India then they get migrants from former colonies, same as to France with Sahelians and Algerians, Spain with Moroccans and Latinxs, Italy with SSAfricans...
>>17440117>All of these are from the former colonized countriesTurkey was a colonising power though.
>>17439895>The thing that drives migration from Africa and Arabia are conflicts that have been caused by European meddling in the regionLiar.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_armed_conflictsCheck 2024 fatalities.Btw there would hundreds of states in africa and indian subcontinent if europeans didn't colonise those places and there would be hundreds of conflicts.
>is not me that sends you to hell it is you that by refusing to hear my message and loving sin, loves hell by your own willI hate this look of Christianity because it makes God look like a manipulator and destroys his mercy.Is our will and ignorance greater than his mercy and understanding? What a weak god then.I thought the whole deal about sin is that it's destructive by nature and we humans CAN'T see it on our own, and even if we follow Christ we will still sin because we can't help it. We aren't God so we aren't perfect and we need his guidance.I hate Christmas that says if you keep sinning, it's because you didn't believe in Christ in the first place. (whatever the fuck sin is because each christian has its own headcanon about God's law)Yes, we humans are stupid and we don't see a lot of things, we aren't deciding shit, we are ignorant. How does me believing Jesus paid the debt (even my future sins) stop me from sinning, when sin comes from our own limits in this life?
>>17437066>you did something finite I don't like, so I will punish you infinitely>this is just and logicalok...
>>17439545This is the exact gaslighting I'm talking about.I've seen many christians behave like this.
>>17439650Again, they just use Christianity as a tool cuz they think it validates them being horrible people. They're jerks and bullies and see the morality police of Islam and want that for themselves Even under their own logic, Jesus will simply tell them, "Be gone from me, I never knew ye"
>>17440599And understand their own logic, not that any of them read the Bible that they proudly thump, they're pharisees who hated Jesus, and who thought they were ass holes right backSelf awareness or reflection is not a trait they have the capacity for
>>17437458Because Christianity is spiritual Judaism for the goy.
What's the relationship between libertarians and the Confederacy?
>>17435782train and bombs and left wing politics weren't invented yet
>>17437439>Rothbard's colleague Joseph Stromberg notes that Rothbard made two exceptions to his general condemnation of war: "the American Revolution and the War for Southern Independence, as viewed from the Confederate side", referring to the American Civil War.[145] Rothbard condemned the "Northern war against slavery", saying it was inspired by "fanatical" religious faith and characterized by "a cheerful willingness to uproot institutions, to commit mayhem and mass murder, to plunder and loot and destroy, all in the name of high moral principle".[146][147][148] He celebrated Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee, and other prominent Confederates as heroes while denouncing Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and other Union leaders, who he said had "opened the Pandora's Box of genocide and the extermination of civilians".[149][150] Rothbard saw secession movements as a tool for undermining and disintegrating the state, according to historian Quinn Slobodian, who wrote that "Rothbard's life was marked by a search for signs of potential secession" and that "When he found them, he did his best to deepen them."[11]
>>17437465the South had 40 some jewish mayors.They werent in line with the American vision, you only say this because you have been miseducated and they retained their traditional economic model.
>>17440001Rothbard also supported parents selling their kids on the "free market" - literally a market for pedos to shop for victims. Rothbard was the jewiest jew to ever jew
>>17435760In a way they are similar, because both Confederate larping and Libertarianism are used as a safe edgy political outlet for Southern White men who can't or won't confront their actual political enemies with a serious ideology like National Socialism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ky1nY3jlq1M
This comic is awesome!Who is the author? Who is the illustrator? I want it.
heresy
>>17440490this scene makes me like yahweh too much
Do you ever notice atheists avoiding saying "Christ"?I mean, they supposedly don't believe in God at all and think it's all a fairytale but they'll go out of their way to say weird things like "sky daddy" or "chrimbus" or "THE jesus". It's like the word Christ itself has some sort of power over them.
>>17440161No, I regularly call you christkikes
>>17440277>people rebelling against their parents' Christianitythat's because their double IQ boomer parents used the religion as a vindictive punishment device like a cudgel rather than one to help their children grow and mature spiritually. american christian boomers did more damage to christianity than any group of atheists.
>>17440161>>17440266>>17440277You will always be a Mexican
>>17440161Christcucks are absolutely deranged
>>17440161because he was a jew and in hebrew his title is moshiach. cristos is a greek word and the church uses a greek word to distance themselves from jews because christianity has more in common with greco-roman pagans and platonism than with jews. if jesuscels wanted to be closer to the original they would say moshiach, but that reminds them that they are not the original abrahamists and only colonised goys
Historically speaking why aren't the welsh given the most blame for the brutal treatment of the irish, rather than the english? The anglo saxons and irish, aside from various raids, had pretty good relations prior to the norman conquestWelsh Cambro Normans were the first "english" to colonise and invade ireland. Walsh is one of the most common surnames in ireland and these cambro normans would be the ones adminstering the pale and other colonised regionsThe welsh tudors would later be the ones to truly embark on a full conquest of ireland, with henry the eights invasion and elizabeth's conquests, and later on James, a stuart and a welsh breton by ancestry whose family line only came back to britain with the norman invasion would plant ulster with scottish and english protestants and control ireland in its entirety.Other notorious figures in irish history such as trevelyan were of brittonic welsh cornish ancestryIt seems to me that the "english" conquest of ireland was really just a war between gaels vs britons with anglos being used as mercenaries
>>17440108I'm from Ireland and I live in England currently, and have met a lot of Welsh people. Irish and Welsh are a lot closer than Welsh and English or Irish and English. The English are a lot more "proper" whereas the Irish and Welsh are more "rough and ready". Even though they might seem similar, even the Norf FC grug English don't really share the same "essence" the Irish and Welsh do. The Welsh routinely got fucked with by the English as bad as the Irish did too, although they gave as good as they got for a long time. I know this is all just my opinion and "vibes" but that's the general sense of things as far as I see it.
>>17440108Irish people that actually know history don’t blame the English in particular, just the British in general. The English, the Welsh, the Scots, they were all up to dodgy shit. As were a large number of traitorous Irishmen.The idea of exempting the Welsh and the Scots comes mainly from foreigners that think British=English and back import their ideas to ignorants in Ireland.
>>17440108>why aren't the welsh given the most blame for brutal treatment of the irish, rather than the English>welsh cambro normans were the first to invade, after allNo. Diarmait Mac Murchada petititoned the King of *England* for support to attack Ruaidrí Ua Conchobar, the High King of Ireland. The King of *England* said he had his permission to seek aid from various soldiers or mercenaries in England. He found this support in the first batch of Normans that invaded; Richard de Clare being the most famous.Later, Henry II, King of *England* intervened, acting on existing intentions (both of Henry II and of the Catholic Church in England) to invade the island. The end result was the creation of the Lordship of Ireland, a papal fief, granted by the pope to the Plantagenet *Kings of England.*Children are able to understand this. Why can't you, OP?
>>17440150Norf FC grug English and the Welsh are virtually identical in mentality and cultural environs. What you’re noticing is not really an Irish or British thing, but a posh faggot vs normal lad thing, it just so happens posh faggots primarily concentrate in the south of England. But you will find them all over the place, they have second homes in Wales, they have well paid positions in Dublin, even some suburbs of Belfast have major posh faggot energy, anyone who goes to university will meet them, you will even meet their slacking failsons at non-ancient institutions.
>>17440150>The Welsh routinely got fucked with by the English as bad as the Irish did too, although they gave as good as they got for a long time
Were the Lusitanians Celts or pre-Celts? What does the consensus argue? With the lack of Lusitanians samples, we cannot know genetically, but linguistically some argue it is a Celtic language considering the lexicon of several anthroponyms and toponymsothers argue the proximity of Lusitanian to the Italic languages mainly based on the names of Lusitanian deities with other etymological elements. and an intriguing theory, somewhat in the "Italic" hypothesis, is that the Luisitanian represents a kind of "Italo-Celt", an archaic branch of Celtic and Italic that separated early from the Proto-Celtic and Proto-Italic populations, linking them to the Bell beakers.ellis evans says it's definitely celtic. What do you think? Culturally, I can't see much distinction in their material culture. but the deities are a little strange to some Celtic pantheons
>>17439084>>17439096No problem man
The were celtsOnly celts could be so matriarchal >Appian claims that when Praetor Brutus sacked Lusitania after Viriathus's death, the women fought valiantly next to their men as women warriors
Pre Celts. There were actual Celts in Northen Iberia, different from Lusitanians
>>17440180Why?
>>17440311Celtiberians certainly spoke a Celtic language though it's exact position in the language family is uncertain. There also appear to be Gaulish tribes on the Asturian/Cantabrian (Orgenomescii is a completely Gaulish name) coast who likely arrived by sea at a much later date. Lusitanian was likely a pre-Celtic Urnfield language that seems closer to Italic than Celtic.
I find it very strange that hominins started in East Africa, spread to the rest of Africa, spread to Europe, spread all over Asia, yet stopped at Beringia and didn't continue on to the Americas. The Cerutti mastodon team say that the reason more evidence of this hasn't been found is that archaeologists aren't looking in areas that old, yet shouldn't this evidence have been accidentally discovered by now (like how the CM site was accidentally discovered during construction work)?>With regard to the apparent lack of evidence of other archaeological sites of Marine Isotope Stage 5 age, we reiterate that North American archaeologists do not routinely survey deposits of this age, do not recognize sites of this age as archaeological, and therefore do not find them. A paleontological crew discovered the CM site. Likewise, the Folsom site was discovered by a paleontological crew in 1926 (Figgins 1927; Meltzer 2006). Archaeologists at the time were not interested in Pleistocene deposits because the prevailing opinion was that humans had not arrived in the Americas this early
>I find it very strange that hominins started in East AfricaOf course you would, that didn't happen
Ogham is Irish... Because it is okayThe Picts aka Albannach didn't exist in Stirling because... They didn't Christianity didn't exist here until the 7th century because... I uh please stop asking questions Why are people obsessed with things in Scotland being Irish
>>17440276
>>17440292>>17440276Chud posts
Which countries would greatly benefit from a Stalin/Mao Zedong style dictator to violently crackdown on old backward cultural customs and drive the economy & industry, even at the cost of millions of lives, and create a new nation ready for the modern world only in the span of a single generation?picrel. Just think of it, It would be kino
>>17439477U.S. gets one next week./thread
>finns consider this a "win"reminder: the finns were so thoroughly broken that, at soviet command, they ordered their own army to fight and expel the germans just days after they had been fighting side-by-sidethey held their own war crime trials and imprisoned their own leadersfor decades after their official state policy was to essentially act as a soviet vassal statewhy don't they get the same embarrassment as the italians? if anything finland deserves mockery the most, they weren't even being actively invaded and occupied like italy in 1943. finns just straight gave up
>>17440469Yes they were. They were entrenching in the Lapland towns despite agreeing to withdraw.>Well, you did, since you agreed to attack the Soviets but didn't.We attacked Soviet Union as agreed. Nobody agreed that we should go down the drain if Germany would.
I want to be frens with Finns.
>>17440471Believe it or not, but most Finns would love to live with you in peace and harmony and have trade but it seems to be impossible for your country's leaders to not spread their bullshit over the borders.
>>17440362Look whos talking. You lost a war to emus
>>17440471based and frendpilled
